Strong Motion Attenuation Relationship For Pshms in Japan: Hongjun Si

Strong Motion Attenuation
Relationship for PSHMs in Japan
Hongjun SI
Kozo Keikaku Eng. Inc/ERI, Univ. of Tokyo
2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.
The 1st Annual Meeting of the Strategic Chinese-Korean-Japanese Cooperative Program: Seismic Hazard
Assessment for the Next Generation Map, November 25~30, 2011, Harbin, China
Outline
Tectonics surrounding Japan
Strong motion observation network
GMPE for PSHMs in Japan
Applicability to worldwide data
About the 2011 Mw9.1 Tohoku earthquake
Summary
Tectonics for Japan
Taira (2001)
Seismicity along tectonic

boundaries
By Bird (2003)
Main earthquakes
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake
http://www. jishin.go.jp/
The types of earthquakes that occur in the

Japanese archipelago and the surrounding area
http://www.hp1039.jishin.go.jp/eqchreng/f2-18.htm
Strong motion
observation
networks in
Japan
After Midorikawa(2005)
Si and Midorikawa (1999) for PGV

Attenuation relation in Japan by Si and Midorikawa (1999)
log PGV = 0.58M w + 0.0038 D + d log( X + 0.0028 100.5 M w ) 0.002 X 1.29
where X, Mw show fault distance, and moment magnitude, respectively. D is focal
depth represented by the depth of the center of a fault plane. d shows is defined as bellow:
d=
0.0 for crustal
-0.02 for inter-plate
0.12 for intra-plate
Si and Midorikawa (1999) is
defined on stiff ground with
Vs30=600m/s
Effects of earthquake type

103
102
Inter plate
102
Crustal
PGV cm/s
cm/s
.
2 2
cm/s
PGA cm/s
Intra plate
Intra
plate
Crustal
101
Inter plate
ACC.
M w = 7.0
Depth = 20 km
101
10
VEL.
M w = 7.0
Depth = 20 km
2
10
100
101
102
Fault
distance km
km
Evaluating the effects on strong motion by the earthquakes

with different tectonic setting, applicable to near source area
Effects of focus depth

103
Depth = 30 km
Depth = 100 km
PGV cm/s
cm/s
2
2
PGA cm/scm/s
Depth = 30 km
102
ACC.
Mw = 7.0
Depth = 100 km
101
100
Intra-subduction-plate
VEL.
Mw = 7.0
Intra-subduction-plate
10 1
10
102
103
101
102
Fault
distance km
km
Evaluating the effects of focus depth and site effects on

strong ground motion
103
Main Application of Si and Midorikawa(1999)

National wide hazard map
Earthquake Early Warning
After NIED
After JMA
10
Applicability of the GMPE in Japan

to the earthquakes in the world 1
Crustal event: The 1994 Mw6.7 Northridge , California earthquake
102
P.G.V cm/s
P.G.A cm/s2
103
102
101
100
100
M w = 6.69
Crustal
Si and M idorikawa(1999)
+/-=0.27
101
101
102
103
M w = 6.69
Crustal
+/-=0.23
100
101
102
Fault distance km
Fault distance km
103

Crustal event: The 2008 Mw7.9 Great Wenchuan, Sichuan, China
WCW
P.G.A ( cm/s2 )
MZQ
102
SFB
P.G.V ( cm/s )
103
102
Soil
Bed Rock
101
100
101
102
WCW
SFB
101
Soil
Bed Rock
100
Mw = 7.9
Si and Midorikawa(1999)
+/-=0.27
MZQ
Mw = 7.9
+/-=0.23
100
Fault distance ( k m )
101
102
Fault distance ( k m )

Crustal event:
The 2010 Mw7.2 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
102
P.G.V cm/s
P.G.A cm/s2
103
102
101
100
Crustal event:
The 1999 Mw7.62 Chi-Chi earthquake
M w = 7.2
Crustal
+/-=0.27
101
101
100
102
Mw = 7.62, aveFDepth=13 km
Crustal
+/-=0.23
103
100
101
Fault distance km
Fault distance k m
102
Applicability of the GMPE in Japan to the

earthquakes in the world: NGA-PGA
14
Applicability of the GMPE in Japan to the

earthquakes in the world: NGA-PGV
15
Strong motion recorded during the 2011

Mw9.1 Tohoku earthquake
16
PGA&PGV for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
P.G.A. ( cm/s2 )
103
102
K-NET
KiK-net
101
M w = 9.1
Si and Midorikawa (1999)
Standard Deviation=0.27
100
101
102
Fault Distance ( km )
Koketsu et al. (2011)
Si, H., Kuyuk, H. S., Koketsu, K. & Miyake, M. Attenuation characteristics of peak ground motion
during the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett. 82, 460 (2011)
Comments by Boore (2011)

http://www.daveboore.com/daves_notes/co
mparisons_of_ground_motions_from_the_
m_9_tohoku_earthquake_with_gmpes_v1.
4.pdf
Figure 2. Observed and predicted

ground motions (see text for
definitions of the GMPE
abbreviations). The yellow band
corresponds to minus and plus one
standard deviation in predicted
values for the Zea06 GMPEs for S
30 V of 345 m/s (because Zea06 uses
discrete site classes, the motions are
the same as for S 30 V of 586 m/s,
because their site class 2 ranges
from 300 to 600 m/s).
Figure 4. Similar to Figure 2, adding
LL08, Aea10, MP10 GMPEs, and
BCHydro10, and showing soil sites only
for GMPEs (except for Aea10 and
MP10, which are only for rock).
18
Comparison of Peak motions for the 2011 Mw9.1 Tohoku

and the 2003 Mw8.3 Tokachi-oki earthquake
102
P.G.V. ( cm/s )
P.G.A. ( cm/s2 )
103
10
This earthqukae
2003 Off Tokachi
101
This earthquake
2003 Off Tokachi
100
10
Si and Midorikawa (1999) Mw = 9.1

100
101

102
100
Koketsu et al. (2004)
101
102
Si, H., Kuyuk, H. S., Koketsu, K. & Miyake, M. Attenuation characteristics of peak ground motion
during the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett. 82, 460 (2011)
2010 Chile and 2001 Peru earthqauke

2 0 1 0 0 2 2 7 0 6 3 4 A NEAR COAST OF CENTRAL CH
0 6 2 3 0 1 E NEAR COAST OF PERU
Date: 2010/ 2/27 Centroid Time: 6:35:14.5 GMT
Date: 2001/ 6/23 Centroid Time: 20:34:23.3 GMT
Lat= -35.98 Lon= -73.15
Lat= -17.28 Lon= -72.71
Depth= 23.2 Half duration=60.0
Depth= 29.6 Half duration=43.2
Centroid time minus hypocenter time: 58.9
Centroid time minus hypocenter time: 69.2
Moment Tensor: Expo=29 1.040 -0.039 -1.000 0.304 -1.520 -0.119
Moment Tensor: Expo=28 2.245 -0.547 -1.698 1.339 -3.728 1.444
Mw = 8.8
Mw = 8.4
mb = 0.0
Ms = 8.3 Scalar Moment = 1.86e+29
Fault plane: strike=19
dip=18 slip=116
dip=74 slip=82
Global CMT
mb = 6.7
Ms = 8.2 Scalar Moment = 4.67e+28
dip=18 slip=63
dip=74 slip=98
Poiata et al. 2010

Boroschek et al. (2010)
Application of GMPE for Mw9 Mega-thrust

log A = b -log ( X+c ) - k X
earthquakes
Coefficient
5
4
3
PGV
2
6
7
8
9
10
Moment magnitude
Si, H., Koketsu, K. & Miyake, M, Midorikawa S. Attenuation Characteristics of Peak Ground Motions from
Giant Earthquakes - The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Other Giant Earthquakes -, Fall meeting of SSJ (2011)
Strong motion for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

(when using Equivalent Hypo. Distance)
102
P.G.V. ( cm/s )
P.G.A. ( cm/s2)
10
10
K-NET
KiK-net
101
101
K-NET
KiK-net
100
ERI, Univ. of Tokyo
ERI, Univ. of Tokyo

101
102
103
Equivalent Hypo. Distance ( km )

102
103
101
Equivalent Hypo. Distance ( km )
Using the slip model by Koketsu et al. (2011)

Si and Midorikawa (1999) for PGV using Ehd

log PGV = 0.58M w + 0.0031D + d log X eq 0.002 X 1.25
where X, Mw show EHD, and moment magnitude, respectively. D is focal depth
represented by the depth of the center of a fault plane. d shows is defined as bellow:
d=
0.0 for crustal
0.06 for inter-plate
0.16 for intra-plate
Si and Midorikawa (1999) is
defined on stiff ground with
Vs30=600m/s
Calculation of Ehd
Slip model by Koketsu et al.(2011)
Definition of Ehd
X eq =
M
M
X
2
i
2
i
2
i
24
Summary
Attenuation model for PSHMs in Japan also can
be applied to the strong motion data world wide

When using closest distance to the fault plane,
additional saturation for M should me considered
in an attenuation model. Fortunately, this
saturation has been considered in the hazard
map in Japan.
the attenuation model using equivalent hypo.
distance seems can be applied to a Mw9 megathrust earthquake.
25
FIN
Thank you !

Strong Motion Attenuation Relationship For Pshms in Japan: Hongjun Si

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strong Motion Attenuation Relationship For Pshms in Japan: Hongjun Si

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strong Motion Attenuation

Relationship for PSHMs in Japan

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Tectonics for Japan

Seismicity along tectonic

The 2011 Tohoku earthquake

The types of earthquakes that occur in the

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Si and Midorikawa (1999) for PGV

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Effects of earthquake type

Evaluating the effects on strong motion by the earthquakes

Effects of focus depth

Evaluating the effects of focus depth and site effects on

Main Application of Si and Midorikawa(1999)

Earthquake Early Warning

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Applicability of the GMPE in Japan

Applicability of the GMPE in Japan

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Applicability of the GMPE in Japan

Applicability of the GMPE in Japan to the

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Applicability of the GMPE in Japan to the

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Strong motion recorded during the 2011

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

PGA&PGV for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

Koketsu et al. (2011)

Comments by Boore (2011)

Figure 2. Observed and predicted

2011 KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc.

Comparison of Peak motions for the 2011 Mw9.1 Tohoku

Si and Midorikawa (1999) Mw = 9.1

Si and Midorikawa (1999) Mw = 9.1

Koketsu et al. (2004)

2010 Chile and 2001 Peru earthqauke

0 6 2 3 0 1 E NEAR COAST OF PERU

Date: 2010/ 2/27 Centroid Time: 6:35:14.5 GMT

Date: 2001/ 6/23 Centroid Time: 20:34:23.3 GMT

Lat= -35.98 Lon= -73.15

Lat= -17.28 Lon= -72.71

Depth= 23.2 Half duration=60.0

Depth= 29.6 Half duration=43.2

Centroid time minus hypocenter time: 58.9

Centroid time minus hypocenter time: 69.2

Moment Tensor: Expo=29 1.040 -0.039 -1.000 0.304 -1.520 -0.119

Moment Tensor: Expo=28 2.245 -0.547 -1.698 1.339 -3.728 1.444

Ms = 8.3 Scalar Moment = 1.86e+29

Fault plane: strike=19

Fault plane: strike=172

Ms = 8.2 Scalar Moment = 4.67e+28

Fault plane: strike=310

Fault plane: strike=159

Poiata et al. 2010

Boroschek et al. (2010)

Application of GMPE for Mw9 Mega-thrust

Strong motion for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

ERI, Univ. of Tokyo

ERI, Univ. of Tokyo

Si and Midorikawa (1999) Mw = 9.1

Equivalent Hypo. Distance ( km )

Si and Midorikawa (1999) Mw = 9.1