Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARED BY:
MODI JAY C.
ROLL NO.: 42
[T.Y. B.B.A., FINANCE]
SUBMITTED TO:
SARVAJANIK EDUCATION SOCIETY,
B. R. C. M. COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
VEER NARMAD SOUTH GUJARAT UNIVERSITY,
SURAT.
YEAR:
2012 2013
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Success is not a destination, but a journey. While I reach towards the end of this journey, I
realize I may not have come this far without the guidance, help and support of people who acted
as guides, friends and torch bearers along the way.
This research was made possible as per the requirement of the BBA course under B.R.C.M.
College of Business Administration. Many individual took interest and were supportive of my effort.
In fact, many have given me their time generously and it is not possible to mention all of them here
and there act of goodness. I take the opportunity to place and record my deep sense of gratitude
to all who have helped me in completion of my study.
This project work would have been possible because of glittering experience, guidance and
exquisite supervision of Mr. Mrunal Joshi has potentially, analytically and critically gone through all
the criteria of the subject of project. I am also very much thankful to my all friends in helping me in
completion of my project report.
Jay Modi
Particulars
Acknowledgement
Executive summary
Ch.1: Introduction
Ch.2: Introduction to topic
Ch.3: Objectives
Ch.4 Research methodology
Ch.5 Findings and analysis
Ch.6 Conclusion and suggestions
Bibliography / References
Annexure
Page no.
II
IV
1
9
30
34
39
83
85
87
CH. 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUTION:
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
CH. 2
INTRODUCTION OF
TOPIC
Mutual fund is an investment company that pools money from shareholders and invests in a
variety of securities, such as stocks, bonds and money market instruments. Most open-end Mutual
funds stand ready to buy back (redeem) its shares at their current net asset value, which depends
on the total market value of the funds investment portfolio at the time of redemption. Most openend Mutual funds continuously offer new shares to investors. Also known as an open-end
investment company, to differentiate it from a closed-end investment company. Mutual funds invest
pooled cash of many investors to meet the funds stated investment objective. Mutual asset value:
total fund assets divided by shares outstanding.
In simple words, Mutual fund is a mechanism for pooling the resources by issuing units to the
investors and investing funds in securities in accordance with objectives as disclosed in offer
document. Investments in securities are spread across a wide cross-section of industries and
sectors and thus the risk is reduced. Diversification reduces the risk because all stocks may not
move in the same direction in the proportion at the same time. Mutual fund issues units to the
investors in accordance with quantum of money invested by them. Investors of Mutual funds are
known as unit holders. The profits or losses are shared by the investors in proportion to their
investments. The Mutual funds normally come out with a number of schemes with different
investment objectives which are launched from time to time. In India, A Mutual fund is required to
be registered with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) which regulates securities
markets before it can collect funds from the public. In short, a Mutual fund is a common pool of
money in to which investors with common investment objective place their contributions that are to
be invested in accordance with the stated investment objective of the schemes. The investment
manager would invest the money collected from the investor in to assets that are defined/permitted
by the stated objective of the schemes. For example, an equity fund would invest equity and equity
related instruments and a debt fund would invest in bonds, debentures, gifts etc. mutual fund is a
suitable investment for the common man as it offers an opportunity to invest in a diversified,
professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost.
Passed
Back to
Investors
Fund Manager
Generates
Fund Manager
Securities
Invest in
SEBI
TRUSTEE
OPERATIONS
MKT. / SALES
SPONSOR
AMC
FUND
MKT. / SALES
MUTUAL FUND
DISTRIBUTOR
SCHEMES
INVESTORS
SPONSOR:
Sponsor is the person who acting alone or in combination with another body corporate establishes
a mutual fund. Sponsor must contribute at least 40% of the net worth of the Investment managed
and meet eligibility criteria prescribed under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual
Fund) Regulations, 1996. The sponsor is not responsible or liable for any loss or shortfall resulting
from the operation of the schemes beyond the initial contribution made by it towards setting up of
the Mutual Fund.
TRUST:
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
SEBI:
The capital market regulates the mutual funds in India. SEBI requires all mutual funds to be
registered with them. SEBI issues guidelines for all mutual funds operations-investment, accounts,
expenses etc. Recently, it has been decided that Money Market Mutual Funds of registered mutual
funds will be regulated by SEBI through (Mutual Fund) Regulations 1996.
RBI:
RBI, a supervisor of the banks owned Mutual Funds-as banks in India come under the regulatory
Jurisdiction of RBI, banks owned funds to be under supervision of RBI and SEBI. RBI has
supervisory responsibility over all entities that operate in the money markets.
Ministry of Finance ultimately supervises both the RBI and the SEBI and plays the role of apex
authority for any major disputes over SEBI guidelines.
Registrar of companies is called Company Low Board. AMCs of Mutual Funds are companies
registered under the Companies Act 1956 and therefore answerable to regulatory authorities
empowered by the Companies Act.
STOCK EXCHANGE:
Stock Exchanges are self-regulatory organizations supervises by SEBI. Many closed ended funds
of AMCs are listed as stock exchanges and are traded like schemes.
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Mutual Fund being public trust is governed by the Indian Trust Act 1882. The Board of Trustee or
the Trustees Company is accountable to the office of public trustee, which in turn reports to the
Charity commissioner.
TYPES OF MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES:
1. BY STRUCTURE
1.1 Open-ended Schemes
1.2 Close-ended Schemes
1.3 Interval Schemes
2. BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
2.1 Growth Schemes
2.2 Income Schemes
2.3 Balanced Schemes
3. OTHER SCHEMES
3.1 Tax Saving Schemes
3.2 Index Schemes
3.3 Sector Specific Schemes
1. BY STRUCTURE
1.1 Open-ended Schemes:
The units offered by these schemes are available for sale and repurchase on any business day at
NAV based prices. Hence, the unit capital of the schemes keeps changing each day. Such
schemes thus offer very high liquidity to investors and are becoming increasingly popular in India.
Please note that an open-ended fund is NOT obliged to keep selling/issuing new units at all times,
and may stop issuing further subscription to new investors. On the other hand, an open-ended
fund rarely denies to its investor the facility to redeem existing units.
1.2 Close-ended Schemes:
The unit capital of a close-ended product is fixed as it makes a one-time sale or fixed number of
units. These schemes are launched with an initial public offer (IPO) with a stated maturity period
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
(ELSS)
by
offering
them
tax
rebate.
Units
purchased
cannot
be
MEASURES
STANDARD
DESCRIPTION
IDEAL RANGE
Standard Deviation allows evaluating the Should be near to its mean
DEVIATION
volatility
of
the
fund.
The
standard return.
R-SQUARE
values
range
SHARP
same as market.
Sharp Ration = Fund return in excess of The higher the Sharp ratio,
RATIO
Association
of
Mutual
Fund
Mutual
Funds
Industry
on
in
India (AMFI)
professional,
is
healthy
dedicated
and
to
ethical
developing
lines
and
the
to
enhance and maintain standards in all areas with a view to protecting and promoting the
interests of mutual funds and their unit holders.
AMFI working group on Best Practices for sales and marketing of Mutual Funds under the
Chairmanship of Shri B. G. Daga, Former Executive Director of Unit Trust of India with Shri Vivek
Reddy of Pioneer ITI, Shri Alok Vajpeyi of DSP Merrill Lynch, Shri Nikhil Khattau of Sun F & C and
Shri Chandrashekhar Sathe, Formerly of Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund has suggested formulation
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
sponsor.
9. Only an independent trustee can be appointed as a trustee of more than one mutual fund, such
appointment can be made only with the prior approval of the fund of which the person is already
acting as a trustees.
LAUNCHING OF A SCHEMES
Before its launch, a scheme has to be approved by the trustees and a copy of its offer documents
filed with the SEBI.
CH. 3
OBJECTIVES
3.2 Objectives
The objective of the research is to insight study knowledge about mutual fund and analyse the
awareness level of investors of mutual fund and various variables playing in the minds of investors
in terms of safety, liquidity, service, returns and tax saving.
CH. 4
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
4.1 Introduction
Research Methodology is a way to systematically solve a problem. It may be understood as a
science of study where research is done scientifically. It includes various steps that are generally
adopted by a researcher in studying his research problem.
According to J.W. Best (1999)
"Research is considered to be formal, systematic, intensive process of carrying on the scientific
method of analysis. It involves a more systematic structure of investigation usually resulting in
some of formal record of procedures and report of result or conclusions."
4.2 Research Statement
The problem studied in the present context is entitled - "Awareness and Perception about Mutual
Fund of investors of Surat City. The research work focuses on awareness and perception of
investor's towards Mutual Funds in Surat City. The study has been undertaken to find the answers
to the following questions:
1. What are the factors that influence investment in Mutual Funds?
2. What are the problems faced by investors of mutual fund?
3. Which tools of investment are popular among the investors?
4. What is the pattern of investment of Mutual Funds?
5. What are the factors that discourage investors of Mutual Funds?
Research Design
The research design is the conceptual structure within which research is conducted. It constitutes
the blueprint for collection, arrangement and analysis of data. A research design includes an
CH. 5
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
FINDINGS AND
ANALYSIS
Introduction
This research work focuses on the profile, awareness and perception of investors from the point
view of investment towards mutual funds in Surat. Primary data was collected with the help of a
structured questionnaire. The questionnaires were distributed among the respondents i.e. mutual
fund investors of Surat city.
The questionnaire has two sections The questionnaire has two sections; the first section relates to
investors awareness and perception about Mutual Fund and the second section relates to
personal details investors of Mutual Funds.In the first section, the respondents were asked
questions regarding preference for tools of investments, selection of schemes, their awareness
about Mutual Fund related charges, their awareness about Mutual Fund, factors discouraging
Mutual fund investment, and the level of satisfaction regarding fulfillment of their objectives.
Chi-Square test, Rank technique and Likert Scale were used to analyze data.
5.1 Demographic Profile of Respondents of Surat City:
5.1.1 Gender Wise Classification of Respondents
Gender
Female
Male
Total
No of Respondents
35
65
100
Percent
35
65
100
Gender
Female; 35%
Male; 65%
Table 5.1.1 and the above graph depict the gender wise classification of respondents. From 100
respondents of Surat, 35 were females and 65 were males.
5.1.2 Age Wise Classification of Respondents
Age groups
Lowest to 30
31 to 45
46 to highest
Total
No of Respondents
19
57
24
100
Age
46 to highest; 24%
31 to 45; 57%
Percent
19
57
24
100
status
of No of Respondents
respondent
Married
Unmarried
Total
92
8
100
Percent
92
8
100
Marital Status
Unmarried; 8%
Married; 92%
Marital status of sample respondents in Table 5.1.3 indicates that majority i.e. 92 (92%) of the
investors in Mutual Funds were married while 8 (8%) were unmarried.
5.1.4 Occupational Status of Respondents
Occupation of respondent
Business
Professional
Salaried employee
Housewife
Retired person
Any other
Total
No of Respondents
11
7
69
3
5
5
100
Percent
11
7
69
3
5
5
100
Occupation of respondent
Any other; 5%
Retired person; 5%
Housewife; 3%
Business; 11%
Professional; 7%
Occupation wise distribution of the respondents is given in Table 5.1.4 and it reveals that 11
respondents (11%) belong to the Business category. 7 respondents (7%) were professionals. 69
respondents (69%) were from salaried employee category. 3 respondents (3%) were housewives,
5 respondents (5%) belonged to the retired person category. 5 respondents (5%) were from any
other category.
5.1.5 Educational Qualification of Respondents
Educational qualification of respondent
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Total
No of Respondents
3
57
32
8
100
Percent
3
57
32
8
100
Educational qualification
Professional; 8% Up to HSC; 3%
Post Graduate; 32%
Graduate; 57%
The Educational qualification level of the respondents is given in table 5.1.5 and it reveals that out
of 100 respondents, 3 respondents (3%) were educated up to higher secondary level i.e. H.S.C. 57
respondents (57%) were graduates. 32 respondents (32%) were Post graduates. 8 respondents
(8%) were professionals.
5.1.6 Number of dependent member in family
Number of dependent member in family
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Frequency
20
15
40
18
3
3
1
100
Percent
20
15
40
18
3
3
1
100
3; 18%
4; 3%
5; 3% 6; 1%
0; 20%
1; 15%
2; 40%
Table 5.1.6 represents number of dependent members in family. 20 respondents (20%) have no
dependents in family. 15 respondents (15%) have only 1 dependent member in family. 40
respondents (40%) have 2 dependent members in family. 18 respondents (18%) have 3
dependents in family. 3 respondents (3%) have 4 dependent members in family. 3 respondents
(3%) have 5 dependent members in family. Only 1 respondent (1%) has 6 dependent members in
family.
5.1.7 Total monthly income of respondent
Total monthly income of respondent
Below Rs.10000
Rs.10000 to Rs.25000
Rs.25000 to Rs. 50000
Rs. 50000 and above
Total
Percent
13
36
49
2
100
The total monthly income of the respondents is given in table 5.1.7 and it reveals that out of 100
respondents, 13 respondents (13%) have monthly income below 10000. 36 respondents (36%)
belong to 10000 to 25000 monthly income group. 49 respondents (49%) have income between
25000 to 50000. Only 2 respondents (2%) have monthly income more than 50000.
5.1.8 Savings/Income percentage group
Savings/Income percentage group
Lowest to 25
26 to 50
51 to 75
75 to Highest
Total
Percent
74
21
3
2
100
Savings/Income Percentage
51 to 75; 3% 75 to highest; 2%
26 to 50; 21%
The savings/Income ratio of the respondents is given in table 5.1.8 and it reveals that out of 100
respondents, most of the respondents mean 74 respondents (74%) have very low savings/income
ratio. It shows that they spent most of their earnings. Their savings seem very poor. 21
respondents (21%) have 26 to 50% income/savings ratio. 3 respondents have 51 to 75% income
savings ratio. It shows that they save money and spent less. Only 2 respondents (2%) out of 100
are in more than 75% ratio of savings/income ratio. It shows that they save their most of the
income.
5.1.9 Awareness of MF years group wise (Write Q.)
Awareness of MF years group wise
Lowest to 3
4 to 6
7 to Highest
Total
Percent
45
44
11
100
Table 5.1.9 shows years of investors awareness about Mutual Fund. 45 respondents (45%) were
aware about Mutual Fund from less than 3 years. 44 respondents (44%) were aware about Mutual
Fund from 4 to 6 years. Only 7 respondents (7%) were aware about Mutual Fund from more than 7
years.
Interpretation of the Profile of Respondents
The profile of the respondents based on age indicates that the age group of 31 to 45 years
constitutes the largest group amongst the respondents who invest in Mutual funds. This shows that
the youth are attracted toward Mutual Funds and invest their savings in Mutual Funds.
Classification of the respondents based on gender indicates that 65 percent are males. This shows
that males dominated as Mutual fund investors. Females were not so much interested in investing
in mutual fund as compared to males. Qualification wise classification of the respondents shows
that graduates constitute the majority of mutual fund investors followed by post-graduates. This
indicates that the graduates and post graduates were attracted towards Mutual Funds
investments. Occupational wise classification of the respondents indicates that majority of the
respondents were from the salaried employees class, followed by business class and
professionals. Income wise classification of the respondents reveals that 49% of the mutual fund
investors had monthly income between Rs.25000 to Rs.50000, followed by monthly income group
10000 to 25000. Classification of the respondents based on savings/income ratio indicates that 74
percent of the respondents have this ration less than 25 percent. Classification of the respondents
based on awareness about Mutual Fund of the respondents indicates that only 11 percent
respondents were about Mutual Fund from more than 7 years.
5.2 Awareness and Perception of Investors towards Mutual Fund Investment:
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
14.0
6.0
12.0
14.0
21.0
10.0
2.0
10.0
6.0
5.0
100.0
4; 14%
The ranks of investment preference for Fixed Deposits are given in table 5.2.1 and it reveals that
out of 100 respondents, only 14 respondents (14%) give first preference to fixed deposits. It shows
that they are less likely to take risk. They prefer safety first. 6 respondents (6%) give second, 12
respondents (12%) give third and 14 respondents (14%) give fourth preference to invest in fixed
deposits. 21 respondents (21%) give fifth rank to fixed deposit investments. The result shows that
total 67 respondents (67%) give one to five ranks for fixed deposits investments. We can also say
that they want to take less risk in their investments.
5.2.2 Investment Preferences for Mutual Funds:
Ranks according to preference for investment MF
1
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
2.0
16.0
8.0
5.0
18.0
27.0
15.0
8.0
1.0
100.0
7; 15%
8; 8%
9; 1% 1; 2%
2; 16%
3; 8%
4; 5%
6; 27%
5; 18%
The ranks of investment preference for Mutual Funds are given in table 5.2.2 and it reveals that
out of 100 respondents, only 2 respondents (2%) give first preference to Mutual Funds. It shows
that they are less likely to take risk. They prefer safety first. 16 respondents (16%) give second, 8
respondents (8%) give third and 5 respondents (5%) give fourth preference to invest in Mutual
Funds. 18 respondents (18%) give fifth rank to Mutual Fund investments. The result shows that
total 49 respondents (49%) give one to five ranks for fixed deposits investments. We can also say
that they want to take less risk in their investments. It may be possible that they are less aware
about different schemes of Mutual Funds.
5.2.3 Investment Preferences for Gold:
Ranks according to preference for investment Gold
1
2
3
4
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
12.0
12.0
20.0
33.0
17.0
1.0
5.0
100.0
7; 1%
8; 5% 1; 12%
5; 17%
4; 33%
2; 12%
3; 20%
The ranks of investment preference for Gold are given in table 5.2.3 and it reveals that out of 100
respondents, only 12 respondents (12%) give first preference to Gold. 12 respondents (12%) give
second, 20 respondents (20%) give third and 33 respondents (33%) give fourth preference to
invest in Gold. 17 respondents (17%) give fifth rank to Gold investments. The result shows that out
of 100 respondents total 94 respondents (94%) give one to five ranks for Gold investments. The
reason for their preference may be increasing price of Gold. We can also say that they want to
take less risk in their investments. It may be possible that they are less aware about different types
of Investment options.
5.2.4 Investment Preferences for Life Insurance:
Ranks according to preference for investment LI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
59.0
12.0
9.0
8.0
5.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
100.0
3; 9%4; 8%
5; 5% 6; 3%
7; 3%
8; 1%
2; 12%
1; 59%
The ranks of investment preference for Life Insurance are given in table 5.2.4 and it reveals that
out of 100 respondents, 59 respondents (59%) give first preference to Life Insurance. It shows that
they are aware about the importance of their life. They want to secure their life n future also. They
dont want that their family face any problems after their death. 12 respondents (12%) give second,
9 respondents (9%) give third and 8 respondents (8%) give fourth preference to invest in Life
Insurance. 5 respondents (5%) give fifth rank to Life Insurance investments. The result shows that
out of 100 respondents total 93 respondents (93%) give one to five ranks for Life Insurance
investments. The reason for their preference may be uncertainty of Life. We can also say that they
dont want to take risk for their life. Through this investment, they can get tax benefit also. So they
prefer this option very much.
5.2.5 Preferences for different investment options:
Ranks given to investment option
Sr.
Investment options
Score
Rank
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
214
360
418
481
508
564
611
729
777
887
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Life insurance
Gold / Jewellery
PPF
FD
Mutual fund
NSC
Share
Post office deposit
Real estate
Bond
Score
Rank
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
310
336
342
345
366
380
438
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Table 5.2.6 shows the Reasons for investment. Most of the investors consider the safety as the
most important factor as a reason of investment. According to this study, out of all these factors
safety is the most important and tax exemption by investing in available option is also an important
factor according to investors.
5.2.7 Safety as a reason for investment:
Rate reason for investment (Safety)
Least important
Somewhat important
Neutral
Important
Most important
Total
Percent
5.0
4.0
11.0
8.0
72.0
100.0
Table 5.2.7 shows the Reasons for investment due to safety. Most of the investors consider the
safety as the most important factor as a reason of investment. According to this study, out of all
these factors safety is the most important and it was said by the 72% respondents.
5.2.8 Tax exemption as a reason for investment:
Rate reason for investment (Tax exemption)
Least important
Somewhat important
Neutral
Important
Most important
Total
Percent
6.0
6.0
37.0
4.0
47.0
100.0
Neutral; 70%
Table 5.2.8 shows the Reasons for investment due to tax exemption. Most of the investors
consider the safety as the neutral factor as a reason of investment. According to this study, out of
all these factors tax exemption is the neutral factor and it was said by the 70% respondents.
5.2.9 Easy to buy & sell as a reason of investment:
Rate reason for investment (Easy buy & sell)
Least important
Somewhat important
Neutral
Important
Most important
Total
Percent
15.0
4.0
29.0
4.0
48.0
100.0
Table 5.2.9 shows the Reasons for investment due to easy buy and sell. Most of the investors
consider the easy buy and sell as the most important factor as a reason of investment. According
to this study, out of all these factors easy buy and sell is the most important factor and it was said
by the 48% respondents.
5.2.10 Diversification of risk as a reason for investment:
Rate reason for investment (Diversification of risk)
Least important
Somewhat important
Neutral
Important
Most important
Total
Percent
9.0
8.0
45.0
5.0
33.0
100.0
Important; 5%
Neutral; 45%
Table 5.2.10 shows the Reasons for investment due to diversification of risk. Most of the investors
consider the diversification of risk as the neutral factor as a reason of investment. According to this
study, out of all these factors diversification of risk is the most important factor and it was said by
the 45% respondents.
5.2.11 Preference to the factors related to mutual fund:
Rate factors related to mutual fund
Sr.
Investment options
Score
Rank
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
306
314
354
359
363
389
390
419
420
435
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Table 5.2.11 shows the preference of investment in mutual fund. Most of the investors consider the
safety as the most important factor as a reason of investment in mutual fund. According to this
study, out of all these factors safety is the most important and high return from investment in
available option is also an important factor according to investors.
5.2.12 Meaning of asked price and offering price
Meaning of asked price and offering price
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
38.0
62.0
100.0
Yes; 38%
No; 62%
The above table& chart shows the mutual fund investor awareness about meaning of asked and
offering price. Out of 100 respondent of survey there is only 38% means only 38 people aware
about asked price and offer price and other 62% people are not aware about asked& offer price.
So I can say that there is lack of awareness about mutual fund to investor.
5.2.13 Aware about CDSC
Aware about CDSC
Yes
No
Total
Percent
9.0
91.0
100.0
No; 91%
In the above shown chart and table it is mentioned that how much awareness is there to mutual
fund investor about CDSC. There are only 9% people aware about CDSC and other 91% people
are not aware about CDSC in mutual fund so there is also lack of awareness about CDSC to
mutual fund investor.
5.2.14 Aware about CDSC
Aware about entry load & exit load
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
60
40
100
Percent
60.0
40.0
100.0
No; 40%
Yes; 60%
Percent
28.0
72.0
100.0
Yes; 28%
No; 72%
Above chart shows awareness about corpus. There is only 28 people aware about corpus out of
100 & other 72 people are not aware about corpus so there is lack of awareness about corpus.
5.2.16 Objective fulfilled
Objective fulfilled
Yes
No
Total
Percent
89.0
11.0
100.0
Objective fulfilled
No; 11%
Yes; 89%
Above chart and table shows objectives fulfilled of investor by investing in mutual fund.
There are 89 people whose objective of investing in mutual fund is fulfilled and others 11 peoples
objective is not fulfilled.
5.2.17 Nominee mandatory
Nominee mandatory
Yes
No
Total
Percent
95.0
5.0
100.0
Nominee mandatory
No; 5%
Yes; 95%
Percent
5.0
19.0
38.0
6.0
32.0
100.0
Frequently; 6%
Less frequently; 38%
Above table and chart frequency of accessing mf scheme. There are 38% people who accessing
their mf scheme less frequently, 19 people access hardly sometimes, 6 people access frequently
and other 5 people never accessing their mf scheme regularly.
5.2.19 Seek information score
Seek information score
Sr.
Seek information factor
Score
Rank
No
1
Experts
129
1
2
Friend, relatives and family
148
2
3
Electronic
178
3
4
Print media
198
4
5
Other
200
5
6
Own
200
6
Above table shows from where investor seek information about mutual fund.
B.R.C.M. College of Business Administration.
Percent
87.0
13.0
100.0
Yes; 87%
Above chart and table shows the awareness about SIP. There are only 13% people means only 13
people aware about SIP and rest of the other 87 people are aware about SIP.
5.2.21 Invest in SIP
Invest in SIP
Yes
No
Total
Percent
67.0
33.0
100.0
Invest in SIP
No; 33%
Yes; 67%
Above given chart shows how many people make invest in SIP. There are 67 % people means 67
people make invest in SIP and other rest are not invest in SIP.
5.2.22 Know the meaning of NAV
Know the meaning of NAV
Yes
No
Total
Percent
90.0
10.0
100.0
Yes; 90%
Percent
15.0
85.0
100.0
No; 85%
Above chart shows that how many investors know how to do calculation of NAV is done.
There are almost 85% people know how to calculate NAV and other 15% are not know how to
calculate NAV of scheme.
5.2.24 Understanding about brand
Understanding about brand
Sponsoring organisation
Rate of return in income or growth
Mutual fund name
Type of the mutual fund scheme
Total
Frequency
82
4
13
1
100
Percent
82.0
4.0
13.0
1.0
100.0
Above chart and table shows that how investor understand about brand.
Most of the people understand brand by sponsoring organization that is 82%. 13% investor
understand brand by mutual fund name. And other investor understand brand by type of scheme&
rate of return in income or growth.
5.2.25 Invested MF type
Invested MF type
Open-ended
Both
Close ended
Don't know
Total
Percent
22.0
26.0
9.0
43.0
100.0
Invested MF type
Open-ended; 22%
Don't know; 43%
Both; 26%
Close ended; 9%
Above given chart and table shows that in which type of MF scheme investor are invest. There are
22% investors who invest in open-ended scheme and 9% investor invests in close ended scheme.
There are 26% investors who invest in both type of scheme. Other 43% investor are dont know
that in which type of scheme they are invested
5.2.26 Known growth scheme
Known growth scheme
Yes
No
Total
Known
Yes
No
Groth
Percent
92.0
8.0
100.0
Taxsaving
Yes; 92%
Above chart shows investor awareness about growth scheme. Almost 92% investor knows about
growth scheme of mutual plan. Other only 8% investors are not known about growth scheme.
5.2.27 Known income scheme
Known income scheme
Yes
No
Total
Percent
79.0
21.0
100.0
No; 21%
Yes; 79%
Percent
92.0
8.0
100.0
Yes; 92%
Above table and chart shows awareness about the tax saving scheme. There are almost 925
investor knows about the tax savings scheme and other rest of the investor are not know about the
tax savings scheme.
5.2.29 Known money market scheme
Known money market scheme
Yes
No
Total
Percent
51.0
49.0
100.0
No; 49%
Yes; 51%
Above charts shows awareness about money market scheme. There are 51% investor who knows
about money market scheme and other 49% investor are not aware about the money market
scheme.
5.2.30 Invested in growth scheme
Invested in growth scheme
Yes
No
Total
Percent
74.0
26.0
100.0
No; 26%
Yes; 74%
Percent
27.0
73.0
100.0
Yes; 27%
No; 73%
Above given chart shows that how many investor invest in income scheme. Out of 100 there are
73% investor who invest in income scheme and rest of other investor are not invest in income
scheme.
5.2.32 Invested in tax-saving scheme
Invested in tax-saving scheme
Yes
No
Total
Percent
60.0
40.0
100.0
No; 40%
Yes; 60%
Above chart and table shows that how many investor make invest in tax saving scheme. There are
60% investor who invested in this scheme and other 40% investor are not invest in tax savings
scheme.
5.2.33 Invested in money market scheme
Invested in money market scheme
Yes
No
Total
Percent
27.0
73.0
100.0
Yes; 27%
No; 73%
Yes
0.0%
12.3%
3.1%
12.5%
9.0%
No
100.0%
87.7%
96.9%
87.5%
91.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
Yes
40.00%
No
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between education qualification and awareness about CDSC.
Most of the investors are not aware about the CDSC throughout the educational qualification.
Some of the investors of graduate and post graduate qualification are aware about the CDSC in
mutual fund.
Chi-square Test
5.2.35 Study of relationship between education qualification and awareness about entry
load and exit load:
Aware about entry load & exit load
Educational qualification of respondent
Yes
No
Total
100.0%
49.1%
71.9%
75.0%
60.0%
.0%
50.9%
28.1%
25.0%
40.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
Yes
50.00%
No
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between education qualification and awareness about entry load
and exit load. Most of the investors are aware about the entry load and exit load throughout the
educational qualification. And HSC qualification investors are having the highest awareness
percent.
5.2.36 Study of relationship between education qualification and awareness about corpus:
Know about corpus
Educational qualification of respondent
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Total
Yes
0.0%
35.1%
12.5%
50.0%
28.0%
No
100.0%
64.9%
87.5%
50.0%
72.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.00%
No
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between education qualification and awareness about corpus.
Most of the investors are not aware about the corpus throughout the educational qualification. And
investors of graduate, post graduate and professional qualification are aware about the corpus in
mutual fund.
5.2.37 Study of relationship between education qualification and awareness about SIP:
Know about SIP
Educational qualification of respondent
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Total
Yes
66.7%
82.5%
93.8%
100.0%
87.0%
No
33.3%
17.5%
6.3%
.0%
13.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.00%
No
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between education qualification and awareness about SIP. Most
of the investors are aware about the SIP throughout the educational qualification. As the education
of the investor increases awareness about SIP increases as the graph indicates the same.
5.2.38 Study of relationship between education qualification and aware about the meaning
of NAV:
Know the Meaning of
NAV
Educational qualification of respondent
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Total
Yes
100.0%
86.0%
93.8%
100.0%
90.0%
No
0.0%
14.0%
6.3%
0.0%
10.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.00%
No
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Up to HSC
Graduate
Post graduate
Professional
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between education qualification and awareness about meaning of
NAV. Most of the investors are aware about the meaning of NAV throughout the educational
qualification. We can say that most of the investors knows meaning of NAV and understands what
the NAV is.
5.2.39 Study of relationship between gender and reason for investment in mutual fund of
high return:
Gender
Female
Male
Total
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Low
Neutral
30.00%
High
Highest
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Female
Male
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between gender and reason for investment in mutual fund of high
return. From the above data we can interpret that there is gradual change in the reason of
investment of high return in mutual fund in the gender wise description. Higher percent of female
are considering high return as a neutral factor on the reason of buying the mutual fund and male
investors considering it as a most important factor.
5.2.40 Study of relationship between age group and reason for investment in mutual fund of
diversification of risk:
Rate reason for investment in MF (Diversification of
Age groups
Lowest to 30
31 to 45
46
to
risk)
Lowest
21.1%
7.0%
20.8%
Low
.0%
1.8%
.0%
Neutral
21.1%
47.4%
41.7%
High
5.3%
.0%
12.5%
Highest
52.6%
43.9%
25.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
highest
Total
13.0%
1.0%
41.0%
4.0%
41.0%
100.0%
Lowest
Low
30.00%
Neutral
High
20.00%
Highest
10.00%
0.00%
Lowest to 30
31 to 45
46 to highest
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between age group and reason for investment in mutual fund of
diversification of risk. From the above data we can interpret that there is gradual change in the
reason of investment of diversification of risk in mutual fund in the age wise classification. As the
age of investors are increasing there is a change of behavior and they are giving low important to
the diversification of risk.
5.2.41 Study of relationship between age group and reason for investment in mutual fund of
high return:
Rate reason for investment in MF (High
Age groups
Lowest to 30
31 to 45
46 to highest
Total
return)
Lowest
10.5%
.0%
8.3%
4.0%
Low
5.3%
7.0%
8.3%
7.0%
Neutral
15.8%
38.6%
41.7%
35.0%
High
.0%
3.5%
4.2%
3.0%
Highest
68.4%
50.9%
37.5%
51.0%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Low
Neutral
30.00%
High
Highest
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Lowest to 30
31 to 45
46 to highest
Table 5.2 shows the relationship between age group and reason for investment in mutual fund of
high return. From the above data we can interpret that there is gradual change in the reason of
investment of high return in mutual fund in the age wise classification. As the age of investors are
increasing there is a change of behavior and they are giving low important to the high return.
Investors in the age group of till 30 years are giving the priority to the high return.
Conclusion:
From the above analysis and interpretation we can conclude that the different factors of investors
affect the buying of them towards the mutual fund investment schemes.
CH. 6
CONCLUSION AND
SUGGESTIONS
Annexure
Questionnaire
I am conducting the survey for studying the awareness and the perception of people
of Surat city about the mutual fund. I assure you that the study is for academic
purpose only and the anonymity of the respondent will be strictly followed and used
for academic purpose only.
Thank you.
Jay Modi.
1. Rank following investment awareness on the basis of your preference for
investment.
(
) FD (all types)
(
) Share
(
) Real estate
(
) Bond
(
) Gold / Jewellery
(
) PPF
(
) Mutual fund
(
) Life insurance
(
) NSC
(
) Post office
deposit.
2. Rate all the following reasons for investment (1 = Least important to 5 = Most
important)
Reasons to invest
1
2
3
4
5
A. Safety
B. High return
C. Tax exemption
D. Diversification of risk
E. Due to more choices
F. Easy buy & sell
G. Due to market trend
Please answer the following questions related to Mutual fund:
No
10. Rate how frequently you access your mutual fund scheme? (1 = Never to 5 =
Very frequently)
1
2
3
4
5
11.
12.
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
14.
15.
16.
Years ___________
17. What is your pattern of investment in the different mutual funds schemes and
known schemes to you?
Different schemes
Known to
Invested in
you
it
A. Growth scheme
B. Income scheme
C. Tax saving scheme
D. Money market scheme
18. Do you think bank account is required to buy mutual
fund?
If yes, which account is required
Savings account
Current account
Yes
Demat account
Any other
Personal details
Gender
Male
No
Female
: _______Years
Marital status
Educational
qualification
Occupation
Married
Unmarried
Graduate
:
Professional
:
Salaried
employee
Professional
Housewife
No. of dependent member in your family : _____________
Total monthly
income
Savings/Income
Up to HSC
Post graduate
Business
Below Rs.10000
Rs.25000 to Rs.50000
_____________%
Retired person
Any other
Rs.10000 to Rs.25000
Rs.50000 and above
Terminologies:
Asked or offering price: The price at which a mutual fund's shares can be purchased. The asked
or offering price means the current net asset value (NAV) per share plus sales charge, if any. For a
no-load fund, the asked price is the same as the nav.
CDSC: Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (CDSC), a charge imposed when the units are
redeemed within the first four years of unit ownership. The SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations,
1996, direct that a CDSC may be charged only for the first four years after purchase and mandates
the maximum amount that can be charged in each year.
Corpus: The total amount of money invested by all the investors in a scheme.
Closed-ended Mutual Fund: They are schemes that have a pre-specified maturity period
generally ranging from 2 to 15 years. One can invest directly in the scheme at the time for the
initial issue and thereafter transact (buy or sell) the units of the scheme on the stock exchanges
where they are listed. The market price at the stock exchanges could vary from the scheme's net
asset value (NAV) on account of demand and supply situation, unit holders' expectations and other
market factors. Some close-ended schemes provide an additional option of selling the units
directly to the Mutual Fund through periodic repurchase at NAV related prices. SEBI Regulations
ensure that at least one of the two exit routes is provided to the investor.
Accrued Income
Other Liabilities
Payables
Accrued Expenses