Professional Documents
Culture Documents
K. K. Jembu Kailas
kkjk@lntecc.com
V. Rangaraj
raaj@lntecc.com
W. Adithya Kumar
aadi@lntecc.com
2)
3)
4)
5)
Electronic ballast
6)
7)
I.
INTRODUCTION
Lighting improvements.
Spinning reserves 5%
II.
Fig. 5 Efficiency classes for fourpole motors of standard IE3, IE2 and IE1
classes, and the new IE4 class
transformers have increased efficiencies even at low loads 98.5% efficiency at 35% load.
E. Electronic Ballast
The conventional ballasts make use of the spike caused by
sudden physical disruption of current in an inductive circuit to
produce the high voltage required for starting the lamp and
then rely on reactive voltage drop in the ballast to reduce the
voltage applied across the lamp.
One of the major advantages of electronic ballast is the
enormous energy savings it provides. This is achieved in two
ways. The first is its amazingly low internal core loss, quite
unlike old fashioned magnetic ballasts. And second is
increased light output due to the excitation of the lamp with
high frequency. If the period of frequency of excitation is
smaller than the light retention time constant for the gas in the
lamp, the gas will stay ionized and, therefore, produce light
continuously. This phenomenon along with continued
persistence of the phosphors at high frequency will improve
light output from 8-12%. This is possible only with high
frequency electronic ballast
F. Occupancy sensors & enery efficient lighting control &
Lamps
These sensors switch lighting ON when occupancy is detected,
and OFF again after a set time period, when no occupancy
movement detected. They are designed to override manual
switches and to prevent a situation where lighting is left on in
unoccupied spaces. With this type of system it is important to
incorporate a built-in time delay, since occupants often remain
still or quiet for short periods and do not appreciate being
plunged into darkness if not constantly moving around.
CFL have taken over from incandescent bulbs and the present
trend is LEDs which save more energy while providing the
same lux levels.
Proposed activities:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
III.
CASE STUDY
Parameter
FAN (6.6kV)
PUMP (6.6kV)
0.97
0.97
Motor efficiency
96.5%
97%
Reduction
280kW
219kW
5000 hrs.
3200 hrs.
1400
700.8
Area
Energy
efficient
Technology
Suitability
Payback
Motors
Very Good
1-1.5yrs
Soft starters
Mill motor
VFD
Very Good
6-8months
Water Pumps
VFD
Very Good
6-8months
Blower pump
VFD
Very Good
6-8months
10
58
Lighting
Good
1.5-2yrs
20
37
30
20
40
11
50
60
4.5
70
80
90
1.5
Energy savings provided here are only for a Fan and Pump.
However, the same philosophy has been followed for other
motors like conveyors & Mill motors.
A. Status without VFD
Parameter
Measurement
FAN (6.6kV)
PUMP (6.6kV)
Motor Rating
1760
775
650TPH
Flow
10000m3/hr
Fan Speed
600RPM
560RPM
Current
182A
88A
1760kW
775kW
Measurement
FAN (6.6kV)
PUMP (6.6kV)
Motor Rating
1760
775
650TPH
Flow
10000m3/hr
Fan Speed
580RPM
490RPM
Current
145A
45A
1480kW
556kW
% Loading
% Savings
Transformer
Unit
Dry type
transformer
Amorphous
Core Dry type
transformer
rating
kVA
1250
1250
no-load loss
2400
2200
-200
load loss
13568
11712
-1856
Annual losses
kWh/
a
71241
62618
-8623
CO2 emission @
0,4 kg/kWh
ton/a
28,5
25,0
-3,5
Difference
2.5
[2]
[3]
[4]
of
Wattage
(kW)
kWhr
(1day)
Annual
kWhr
Original
system
1524
42.786
213.93
51,344
After
implement
ation
of
above
1524
40.057
100.285
24,068
of
Wattage
(kW)
kWhr
(1day)
Annual
kWhr
Original
system
482
21.584
213.93
69,173.8
After
implement
ation
of
above
446
21.486
200.285
30,898.9
IV.
CONCLUSION