Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
A 205-570-975
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Guendelsberger, John
Userteam: Docket
Cite as: Axel Omar Angel-Zapet, A205 570 975 (BIA Jan. 12, 2015)
.J?
' '
'
. U S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
..
File:
Date:
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL AND MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT:
ON BEHALF OF DHS:
An appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision in this case is currently pending before the
administratively close these proceedings based on the approval by the United States Citizenship
and Immigration Service ("USCIS") of his Form 1-821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals.
The Department of Homeland Security has not opposed it. See 8 C.F.R.
1003.2(g)(3). The motion will be granted, and the proceedings will be administratively closed.
If either party to this case wishes to reinstate the proceedings, a written request to reinstate
the proceedings may be made to the Board.
unless a request is received from one of the parties. The request must be submitted directly to
the Clerk's Office, without fee, but with certification of service on the opposing party.
Accordingly, the following order will be entered.
ORDER: The motion is granted, and the proceedings before the Board in this case are
administratively closed.
Cite as: Axel Omar Angel-Zapet, A205 570 975 (BIA Jan. 12, 2015)
JAN l 2 2015
In the Matter of
CHARGES:
212(a)(6)(A)(i).
APPLICATIONS:
Continuance.
)
)
)
)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
August16,2013
File: A205-570-975
separate and apart from the respondent's removal proceedings. Even a final order of
removal does not prevent the respondent from seeking deferred action. Furthermore,
should it become necessary, a request for a stay of removal pending consideration of
Homeland Security. See 8 C.F.R. 24 1.6(a) and 1241.6(a). Respondent makes no other
application for relief, including voluntary departure. Given the fact that removability has
been established by clear and convincing evidence,the Court would order removal from
the United States to Guatemala on the charge contained in the Notice to Appear.
J. DAN PELLETIER
Immigration Judge
A205-570-975
August 16,
2013
an application for relief that is before USCIS can be addressed to the Department of
CERTIFICATE PAGE
I hereby certify that the attached proceeding before JUDGE J. DAN PELLETIER,
A205-570-975
ATLANTA,GEORGIA
was held as h erein appears,and that this is the original transcript thereof for the file of
the Executive Office for Immigration Review.