Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
6168
[No. 2300-R.
and
th::lt
she
affixed
there to
her thum1'mark in
-It
the
has also
failed to mention that the witnesses signed said will and every
one of the pages of which it consists in the presence of each
,other and of the test_trix.
facts o the validity of the will renders th same null and void.
(Uy Coque
vs.
48 Phil., 506;
vs.
vs.
Quintana,
Quinto
vs.
of Leyte.
Diez, J.
DECEMBER, '.r950
No.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
6169
administrator
on
March
30, 1946.
On November 23,
p aricio
At
the trial of said two cases, the parties entered into the
following agreement of facts :
de"isl
on No
guerrilla forces
in
The so-caled last will and testament of Filomena Be1moy, marked Exhibit B, in which she willed all her estate
exclusively in favor of her daughtei Leopolda Valenzona,
written in the Visayan dialect and c'om) csed uf three pages
is dated Septe:ner 2,
6170
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
DECEMBER, 1950
6171
el Juzgado
deniega
la
legalizaci6n
(Rules of
we1
our names hereuncer in ordPr to attest 'to truth that this testament
consist two pages, and or;. tte third page is our atteEtc.ition as wit
ntsses_ and we also sign2d our n!3mes on all the left margins of e1i
testament,
this
2nd
day
of
Septernrer,
1941,
at
barrio
Caridad,
of sheets or
pag-es used, P.pon 'Vhich the wiJl is writt.::,n, and the fact that the
testator signed the will &:rd e:er:,.- paise
ttereof,
or caused
some
other person to write his name, under his express airect;un, in foe
presence of three witnesses, and the btte:r witnessed and signed the
will and all pages thereof in the presence of the tes+a tor and of each
other."
617'2
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
"We, l;l:e undersignerl witneses of this will, stat that it :has been
shown to us by the iestatrix as her last will and testament.
And as
she cannot sign her name, she asked thac Mr. Filomeno Piczon sign
her name in the presence of each of us, and each of us, the Nit
nesses, also signed in the presence of the testatrix."
DECEMBER, ] 950
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
6173
The will was, therefore, considered null and void and was
not admitted to probate.
In the case of Sano vs. Quintana, 48 Phil., 506, the
following doctrine was laid down:
"An attestation clause which does not recite that the witnesses
signed the will and each and every page thereof on the left margin
in the presence of the testator is defective, and .such a defect annuls
the will."
(Syllabus)
"*
in our presence and that we signed the said will in the presence of
the testator and in the presence of each and everyone of us; said
will consists of ten used pages, including this last page."
regorio
Pueblo
en
Carmen Quinto;
lo
firmaron
llos
en
Este
2645, in two ways: First, it fails to state that each and every page
of tI'.e will was signed by the testators and the witnesses; ann,
second, it fails to state tl:at the witnefses sig-ned each and every
page of the will iri the presence oi tl-ie testators,"
Mojal
to be
his last will and testament in the presence of each of us, and at the
request of said testator Don Antonio l\frjal, we signed this will in
the presence of each other and of the testator.
"PEDRO C.\RO
MORCO
"ZOILO MASINAS"
"SILVERIO
6174
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
namely,
that the
testator does not appear to have signed on all the sheets of the will
in the presence of the three witnesses, and the latter to have attested
and signed on all the sheets in the presence of the testator and of
each other, it must be noted that in the attestation clause above
the attesting witnesses saw each other sign the will, such a require
ment was clearly and sufficiently complied with.
in this clause is whether the testator and the witnesses signed all the
sheets of the will.
"The act of the testator a!ld the witnesses seeing reciprocally the
signing o: the will is one which cannot be proven by the mere exhibi
tion of the will unless it is stated in th8 document.
But the
fact of the testator and the witnesses having signed all the sheets
of the will may be proven by the mere examination of the document,
although it does not say anything about this, and if that is the fact,
as it is in the instant case, the danger of fraud in this respect,
which is what the law tries to avoid, does not exist.
"Therefo:::e, as in the instant; case the fact that he testator and
the witnesses signed each 'lnd every page of the will is proven by the
mere examination
of the sig-natures in
the will,
the
omission
to
expressly state such evident fact docs not invalidate the will nor
preven+- its probate.
"Tbe order appt>aled from is ciffi1med with the costs against the
appellant.
So ordererl.."
Tribunal to the provisions of article 618, Act 190, regarding tbe failure of the attestation clause to menti0n the
fact that the te3tator anq the witnes% signed each and
'
case
of
Nayve
vs.
supn,
is
not
of the pages of i,,vhich the will consists, but also in the fact
DECEMBER, 1950
6175
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
to sign for her and that she affixed her thumbmark with
the assistance of Mateo Murillo to each and every page of
said will i11 the presence of each and every one of the
witnesses who in turn signed each and every page of the
oppositors.
[No. 2655-R.
HOMICIDE;
EVIDENCE;
EXTRAJUDICIAL 8ELF-SERVING
(People
vs.
Piring et al.,
SC-G.K
No.
!). 1014.)
'
0 Sulu.
Villa!obo; J.
l!f
,,
JUGO, J.: