You are on page 1of 6

APPLICATION FORM

This form must be completed in full. If some details are omitted, the company reserves the
right to reject the application.
Particulars of Applicant
Name of Applicant: Zubir Osman

NRIC No.: S960241Z

2 m)

Home Address: Blk 627 Jurong West Street 65 #02-376 (

2 m)

Singapore 640627
(Any legible address)
Contact No.:92268334

2 m)

(number should resemble


authentic ID no)
Date of Birth (DD/MM/YY)
30/01/1996

2 m)

(Any legible number)

Age:16 (

2 m)

2 m)

(To be marked with date of


birth)

Please provide the following information.


1.
State the days you are available for work:
Monday and Wednesday. (1m)
2.

State the number of hours you are able to work per day:
5 hours a day (1m)

3.

(i)
Do you have any prior work experience?
*Yes / No (1m)
(ii)
If the answer to 4(i) above is Yes, please give details below:
Name of Company
Position
Period of Work
Sandwich Delight (1m)
Assistant cook (1m) 30th May to 30th August 2012
(1m)

5.

State the date you can start work:


22nd December 2013 (1m)

N.B. Where an asterisk(*) is used or alternative answers are provided, cross out the word(s) that do not
apply. DO NOT use any other method of indicating your answer.
[10 marks]

PAPER ONE: MARKING SCHEME


Functional Writing 20 marks
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND BAND DESCRIPTORS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF WRITITNG IN PART 2
Part 2 is marked as follows:
Task Fulfillment
10 marks
Language Use 10 marks
Assessment Criteria for Task Fulfillment

Interpretation of task

Selection of Information

Generation of information / ideas

Development of information / ideas


Band

Mark Range

9 -10

Band Description

Accurate interpretation of task showing good understanding of purposes,


audience and context

Appropriate selection of relevant information

Helpful and focused additional information / ideas

Information / ideas

Generally accurate interpretation of task showing fairly good


understanding of purposes, audience and context.

Generally appropriate selection of relevant information.

Sensible and relevant additional information / ideas.

Information / ideas are developed but not thoroughly

Satisfactory interpretation of task showing some understanding of


purposes, audience and context.

Some awareness of need to select information

Some additional information / ideas may not always be relevant

Information / ideas are minimally developed

Misinterpretation of showing incomplete understanding of purposes,


audience and context.

Little or no attempt to select information

Either no additional information / ideas or entirely irrelevant additional


details

Information / ideas are mostly undeveloped

marks

68
marks

3-5
marks

1-2
marks

Assessment Criteria for Language Use


2

Accuracy of language in terms of grammar, sentence structure, punctuation and spelling


Appropriate use of vocabulary
Clarity of expression and organization

Band

Mark Range

9 -10
marks

Band Description

Language is mainly accurate and meaning is always clear

68
marks

35
marks

12
marks

Paragraphs used, but they are not well-linked, affecting coherence


Sentence structures that are mainly correct and occasionally varied
Less consistent in the accurate of sentence separation; use of
punctuation and / or spelling
Adequate vocabulary, often lacking in precision
Tone and register acceptable for the nature of the task

The gist can be followed, but error and linguistic limitations affect precise
understanding of details and parts of the answer may require re-reading before
meaning becomes clear

Coherent paragraphs that are well-linked


Sentence structures that are consistently correct and varied
Accurate sentence separation; appropriate punctuation; and correct
spelling
A range of appropriate vocabulary
Tone and register appropriate to the nature of the task

Language is mostly accurate. Meaning is seldom in doubt but there may be


occasional blurring

Linking of points for both within and between paragraphs may be


haphazard with little coherence
Mostly simple sentence structures that are sometimes inaccurate, with
occasional lack of clarity of expression
Numerous errors of sentences separation / punctuation and / or spelling
Limited vocabulary
Tone and register often inappropriate to the nature of the task

Errors, particularly of grammar, seriously impede communication of meaning.

Paragraphs are rarely or wrongly used with little or no evidence of


coherent linking of ideas
Limited understanding of writing in sentences; expression often unclear
For most part, faulty punctuation and incorrect spelling
Very simple sometimes inaccurate vocabulary
Tone and register inappropriate to the nature of the task

ppropriateness of register and tone

SECTION B
Guided Writing 30 marks
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND BAND DESCRIPTORS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF WRITITNG IN SECTION B
Section B is marked as follows:
Task Fulfillment
15 marks
Language Use 15 marks
Assessment Criteria for Task Fulfillment

Interpretation of task

Selection of Information

Generation of information / ideas

Development of information / ideas


Band

Mark Range

12 -15

marks

8 11

marks

47

marks

13

marks

Band Description

Accurate interpretation of task showing good understanding of purposes,


audience and context
Appropriate selection of relevant information
Helpful and focused additional information / ideas
A clear and coherent attempt to elaborate on the given information and to
convey convincingly the experience of the event
Generally accurate interpretation of task showing fairly good
understanding of purposes, audience and context.
Generally appropriate selection of relevant information.
Sensible and relevant additional information / ideas.
A sensible attempt to elaborate on the given information and to convey a
sense of the event
Satisfactory interpretation of task showing some understanding of
purposes, audience and context.
Some awareness of need to select relevant information
Some additional information / ideas may not always be relevant
Limited attempt to elaborate on the given information with either very little
irrelevant. Information provided is likely to be repeated as responses.
Misinterpretation of task showing little or no understanding of purposes,
audience and context.
Little or no attempt to select relevant information
Either no additional information / ideas or entirely irrelevant additional
details
Little or no attempt to elaborate on the given information or to offer any
credible description of the event. Responses may be almost entirely
dependent on the given information.

Assessment Criteria for Language Use

Accuracy of language in terms of grammar, sentence structure, punctuation and spelling

Appropriate use of vocabulary

Clarity of expression and organization


4

Appropriateness of register and tone

Band

Mark Range

12 -15
marks

Band Description

Language is mainly accurate and meaning is always clear

Coherent use of own words


Coherent and logical thinking of points both within and between
paragraphs
Sentence structures that are consistently correct and varied
Accurate sentence separation; appropriate punctuation; and correct
spelling
A range of appropriate vocabulary
Tone and register appropriate to the nature of the task

8 11
marks

Language is mostly accurate. Meaning is seldom in doubt but there may be


occasional blurring

47
marks

The gist can be followed, but error and linguistic limitations affect precise
understanding of details and parts of the answer may require re-reading before
meaning becomes clear

13
marks

Generally uses own words with occasional lifting from the text
Paragraphs may not always be effectively sequenced but development of
points with in paragraphs is likely to be coherently structured
Sentence structures that are mainly correct and occasionally varied
Less consistent in the accuracy of sentence separation; use of
punctuation and / or spelling
Adequate vocabulary, often lacking in precision
Tone and register acceptable for the nature of the task

Some use of own words with frequent lifting from the text
Linking of points for both within and between paragraphs may be
haphazard with little coherence
Mostly simple sentence structures that are sometimes inaccurate, with
occasional lack of clarity of expression
Numerous errors in sentence separation / punctuation and / or spelling
Limited vocabulary
Tone and register often inappropriate to the nature of the task

Errors, particularly of grammar, seriously impede communication of meaning.

Frequent lifting from the information provided with little evidence of


understanding
Paragraphs are rarely or wrongly used with little or no evidence of
coherent linking of ideas
Limited understanding of writing in sentences; expression often unclear
For most part, faulty punctuation and incorrect spelling
Very simple sometimes inaccurate vocabulary
Tone and register inappropriate to the nature of the task

You might also like