Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amplifiers
Section 12.1 The Miller Theorem
Amplifiers were introduced before. In the previous chapters, we only talked about the
gain of an amplifier. We did not talk about the frequency of the input signal. In fact,
we deliberately ignored frequencies to simplify the discussion. In Fig. 12.1-1, we
illustrate a small signal equivalent circuit of a transistor.
12-1
12-2
v2
v1
equation:
i1
v 2 v1 kv1 v1 (k 1)v1
Z
Z
Z
(12.1-1)
Z
(1 k )
(12.1-2)
Finally, we have:
i1
v1
Z1 '
(12.1-3)
Similarly, we have
Z2 '
Z
1
(1 )
k
kZ
( k 1)
(12.1-4)
12-3
and
i2
v2
Z2 '
(12.1-5)
The above discussion indicates that we may have an equivalent circuit for the circuit
in Fig. 12.1-3(a), as illustrated in Fig. 12.1-3(b).
The above discussion is called Miller Theorem.
and
Z2 '
v ds
k . For a capacitor, its corresponding
v gs
1
1
. Therefore, for an amplifier, we have Z 1 '
jC GD
j (1 k )C GD
1
1
amplifier as shown in Fig. 12.1-4. These two capacitors are often called Miller
capacitors.
12-4
Example 6-1
.protect
.lib 'c:\mm0355v.l' TT
.unprotect
.op
.options nomod post
VDD 1
RL
1
0
11
3.3V
100k
.param W1=5u
M1
11 2
3
12-5
2
0
3
0
DEC
0.65v
AC 1
100 1
10000000k
.PLOT AC VDB(11)
.END
Fig. 12.1-6 The gain vs frequency for the amplifier in Fig. 12.1-5
Experiment 12.1-2: An Amplifier with a Higher Gain
In this experiment, we used the circuit shown in Fig. 12.1-7. The gain of this
amplifier is much higher as explained before. The program is in Table 12.1-2 and the
12-6
result is shown in Fig. 12.1-8. As can be seen, the bandwidth is significantly reduced.
Ex 6-20
.protect
.lib 'c:\mm0355v.l' TT
.unprotect
.op
.options nomod post
0
5V
VDD 1
Rm2 vout vout_1 0
1_1 0
Rm1 1
.param W1=10u W2=20u W3=30u W4=30u
12-7
M4
3
2
1_1 1
+pch L=1u W='W4' m=1
+AD='0.95u*W4' PD='2*(0.95u+W4)'
+AS='0.95u*W4' PS='2*(0.95u+W4)'
M3
vout 4
3
1
+pch L=0.5u
W='W3' m=1
+AD='0.95u*W3' PD='2*(0.95u+W3)'
+AS='0.95u*W3' PS='2*(0.95u+W3)'
M2
vout_1 6
7 0
+nch L=0.5u
W='W2' m=1
+AD='0.95u*W2' PD='2*(0.95u+W2)'
+AS='0.95u*W2' PS='2*(0.95u+W2)'
M1
7
8
0
0
+nch L=1u W='W1' m=1
+AD='0.95u*W1' PD='2*(0.95u+W1)'
+AS='0.95u*W1' PS='2*(0.95u+W1)'
Vin
9
0
AC 1
.AC DEC
100 1
VG1 8
9
0.817V
VG2 6
0
1.8V
VG3 4
0
3V
VG4 2
0
4V
*.tf v(vout) vin
*.tran 0.1us 600us
.plot VDB(vout_1)
.end
1000000k
12-8
Fig. 12.1-8 The gain vs frequency for the amplifier in Fig. 12.1-7
12-9
(12.2-1)
v out (1 A( S )k ) A( S )vin
(12.2-2)
Thus, we have
G(S )
v out
A( S )
vin
1 A( S )k
(12.2-3)
It must be understood that this is a negative feedback and will reduce the gain.
Based upon the discussion presented in Section 12.1, we understand that an
amplifier can be roughly viewed as a low-pass filter. For simplicity, we assume that
the transfer function of our amplifier is a first-order one. That is, we have
A( S )
a 0
S 0
(12.2-4)
a 0
S 0
a 0
a 0
G(S )
ka 0
S 0 k 0 S (1 k ) 0
1
S 0
(12.2-5)
a
. Thus, we
(1 k )
a
. Again, from Equation (12.2-4), we
(1 k )
obtain the bandwidth for the open-loop case to be 0 . From Equation (12.2-5), we
observe that the bandwidth is increased from 0 to (1 k ) 0 . Thus for the close
(1 k ) 0 a 0 which is
loop case, the gain-bandwidth product is
(1 k )
constant.
In the following, we shall show some experiments related to the frequency
response of amplifiers.
12-10
12-11
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M10
M11
VBIAS5
VB5 0
1.9V
VBIAS6
VB6 0
1.9V
VBIAS9
VB9 0
0.6V
VBIAS1 VB11 0
1.75V
VB
Vi- 0
1.65v
Vin1 11 0
AC 1
.AC DEC
100 1 100000k
Vin2 Vi+ 11 1.65v
*Ri
*Rf
1
2
3
4
3
4
5
6
7
Vo
Vo
12
12
1
VDD!
1
VDD!
3
1
3
2
VB5 5
VB6 6
Vi7
Vi+
7
VB9 VSS!
4
VDD!
VB11 VSS!
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VDD!
VSS!
0
3.3k
Vo 220k
.PLOT AC VDB(Vo)
.END
12-12
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
PCHW=150U L=2U
NCH
W=50U L=2U
Fig. 12.2-4
Table 12.2-2
open loop test
.PROTECT
12-13
.OPTION POST
.LIB "C:\mm0355v.l" TT
.UNPROTECT
.op
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M10
M11
VBIAS5
VB5 0
1.9V
VBIAS6
VB6 0
1.9V
VBIAS9
VB9 0
0.6V
VBIAS1 VB11 0
1.75V
VB
Vi- 0
1.65v
Vin1 11 0
AC 1
.AC DEC
100 1 100000k
Vin2 Vi+ 11 1.65v
*Ri
*Rf
1
2
3
4
3
4
5
6
7
Vo
Vo
12
12
1
VDD!
1
VDD!
3
1
3
2
VB5 5
VB6 6
Vi7
Vi+
7
VB9 VSS!
4
VDD!
VB11 VSS!
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VSS!
VDD!
VSS!
0
3.3k
Vo 220k
.PLOT AC VDB(Vo)
.END
12-14
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
PCH
W=50U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
NCH
W=100U L=2U
PCHW=150U L=2U
NCH
W=50U L=2U
Fig. 12.2-5
Experiment 12.2-2: Another Experiment with a Different Feedback Circuit
In this experiment, we used the same amplifier circuit as that used in Experiment
12.2-1. The feedback circuit diagram is exactly as shown in Fig. 12.2-1. The circuit
is shown in Fig. 12.2-6, the program is in Table 12.2-3 and the new bandwidth is
shown in Fig. 12.2-7. As can be seen, the bandwidth is enlarged.
12-15
VDD VDD!
3.3V
12-16
VSS
VSS!
0V
M1
1
1
VDD!
M2
2
1
VDD!
M3
3
3
1
M4
4
3
2
M5
3
VB7 5
L=2U
M6
4
VB8 6
L=2U
M7
5
Vi- 7
L=2U
M8
6
Vi+ 7
L=2U
M9
7
VB9 VSS!
L=2U
M10 vout 4
VDD!
M11 vout VB11 VSS!
L=2U
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VDD!
VSS!
PCH
PCH
PCH
PCH
W=50U
L=2U
W=50U
L=2U
W=50U
L=2U
W=50U
L=2U
NCH
W=100U
VSS!
NCH
W=100U
VSS!
NCH
W=100U
VSS!
NCH
W=100U
VSS!
VDD!
PCH
VSS!
vin+ vin
VIN- ViVBIAS7
VBIAS8
VBIAS9
VBIAS1
R1
vout 8
10000K
R2
8
0
100K
R3
8
Vi+ 10K
R4
vin Vi+ 10K
* transient simulation ***
NCH
W=100U
W=150U
NCH
L=2U
W=50U
0
AC
1 sin(1.65 0.00001 1k)
0
1.65
VB7 0
1.9V
VB8 0
1.9V
VB9 0
0.6V
VB11
0
1.75V
12-17
.end
12-18