Professional Documents
Culture Documents
II
The US Public Health Service in 1963 listed nearly 100 signs and symptoms
associated with hyperactivity and altered the name to minimal brain
dysfunction.
However, the expression minimal brain damage is preferable, since the
dysfunction is the consequence of actual brain damage.
Within a decade minimal brain damage was presenting a major challenge to
the American school system and to child psychiatry generally. Paul Wender,
a leading authority, wrote in 1971 that the disorder occurs in conjunction
with and possibly as the basis of virtually all . . . categories of childhood
behaviour disturbances. . Embarrassing but true and that it is probably the
most common single diagnostic entity seen in Child Guidance Clinics.
The Shaywitzes, professors of paediatrics at Yale Medical School, wrote in
1984 that minimal brain damage is perhaps the most common, and certainly
one of the most time-consuming problems in current paediatric practice.
And the Journal of the Medical Association in 1988 called minimal brain
damage the single most prevalent disability reported by elementary schools
and one of the most common referral problems to child psychiatry
outpatients clinics . . . probably the most researched problem in child
psychiatry.
Boys manifest it five or ten times as frequently as girls, and it was once
thought to be an exclusively male disorder.
The American Psychiatric Association estimates that three percent of US
prepubertal children suffer from one or another manifestation of minimal
brain damage (from thirty to seventy-five percent of these are also
hyperactive, depending on whose opinion one accepts).
But the APAs figures are certainly understated. If the figure was only three
percent, this disorder would not be the most common single diagnostic
entity seen in child Guidance Clinics. Those who have estimated the
prevalence level at fifteen to twenty percent of school children are closer to
the mark. But even this may be an understatement. Kathleen Long and
David McQueen, studying the Maryland and District of Columbia school
systems in 1984 (where thirteen percent of children are already in special
education classes), concluded that [minimally brain damaged] children are
significantly under detected . . . nationally in public school systems.
In any case, the prevalence of minimal brain damage with hyperactivity is
steadily rising.
Dyslexia is the reason why Johnny Cant Read today. Although solutions to
the problem of galloping illiteracy in the United States are continually being
proposed, no one really believes they will work. Our educational
establishment is just conducting a holding action in the hope that they will
wake up one day and find that Johnny can read after all.
This will never occur, however, as long as all the Johnnies in the country are
being vaccinated with substances capable of making them dyslexic.
The connection between sudden infant death, asthma, and other breathing
difficulties all due to impairment of the cranial nerves governing respiration
should be investigated further, with particular reference to childhood
vaccinations.
The parallels between the various cranial-nerve palsies in autism and minimal
brain damage suggest a common origin of these two conditions and even
an overall identity, differing from one another only in degree. Both are
specific manifestations of a larger phenomenon, the post-encephalitic
syndrome (discussed in the following chapter) which in most cases the
consequence of childhood vaccinations.
The suicide rate among late adolescents in the United States doubled
between the 1960s and the 1980s; even small children are found to have
suicidal ideas thirteen percent in one group studied. This is usually explained
by psychiatrists and psychologists as a reaction to increased family tensions,
divorce, and the like. No one has yet thought to inquire into the possibility
that cause and effect run the other way; having a hyperactive, learning
disabled, anorexic, and suicidal child in the family might quite well contribute
to family tensions and thus to an increased divorce rate.
In any case, more attention should be directed to the connection between
suicidal impulses in childhood and adolescence and the burden of
encephalitis-induced minimal brain damage in infancy. And, in the broader
sense, the medical profession should focus on vaccine damage as a possible
cause of many of the typical mental illnesses and syndromes of todays
children and adolescents.
Children are the building blocks of the family and later to society. If these are
defective from infancy, the development of both family and society will be
distorted and denatured.
When ten or twenty percent of children are minimally brain-damaged, how
can family life be normal? When ten or twenty percent of high-school
graduates have never learned to read, how can they not watch television
during most of their waking hours? When over a million children every day are
legally receiving amphetamines and other drugs in school to suppress
hyperactivity, how can there not be a drug culture?
The family and society are both victims of vaccination programs forced on
them by state legislatures which are entirely too responsive to medical
opinion and medical organizations. Committee chairmen who unhesitatingly
criticize economists, ecologists, city-planners, and manufacturers become
uncharacteristically meek when confronting a medical expert.
These programs have spawned the profusion of twisted and distorted
individuals who have created the American society we know today.
36 points to 466. The scores today are the lowest in the sixty-year history of
these tests.
And since the tests themselves have actually become easier, other
researchers conclude that the IQ decline is fifty percent worse.
The first corrective measure, which should be taken at once, is to suspend all
childhood vaccinations pending an investigation of their true impact on the
public health. When and if these programs are resumed, the shots should
be voluntary, not compulsory.
Immunization will always involve a risk, however many improvements are
made in the design and manufacture of vaccines. Hence it is intolerable
that families should be compelled by the government to subject their
children to this threat. Decisions which affect the individuals health and life
should not be forced upon him by self-appointed groups of experts who are
not even in a position to take responsibility for their errors.
The errors of physicians are being paid for by thousands and thousands of
American families. What have they done to deserve such a fate?
Our authorities should be mindful of the fact that in Western Europe only the
tetanus and the oral poliomyelitis vaccinations are obligatory. They should
heed the words of Justus Stroem, the prominent Swedish vaccine specialist,
who stated, The modern infant must receive a large number of injections,
and a reduction in their number would be a distinct advantage.
The most immunized child in history should disappear into history.