Professional Documents
Culture Documents
llillllllllllillill
-!
ltntlul
PIERRE BRIANT
Translated
by
P E T E R T.
DANIELS
Contents
List of Illustrations
Preface to the English Translation
Translator's Preface
xi
xv
xix
1. W a s T h e r e a n A c h a e m e n i d E m p i r e ? 1;
Again: F r a g m e n t s of
ego-histoire
4. S p a c e a n d T i m e 9;
1;
2. F r o m A l e x a n d e r to C y r u s a n d Back
3. T h e Historian a n d H i s E v i d e n c e 5;
T o the R c a d e i
J I;
A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s 12
16;
13
2. T h e F o u n d e r L e g e n d s 14;
4. A n s a n a n d S u s a 17;
18;
3. T h e K i n g s of
6. A n s a n , E c b a t a n a , B a b y l o n , a n d S u s a 21;
8. C o n c l u s i o n
27
PART 1
T H E E M P I R E - B U I L D E R S : FROM CYRUS TO DARIUS
31
31;
3. T h e D e f e a t of C r o e s u s a n d the E s t a b l i s h m e n t of a M e d i t e r r a n e a n F r o n t 35;
4. C y r u s in C e n t r a l Asia 38;
5. T h e C a p t u r e o f B a b y l o n (539) 40;
6. C y r u s , T r a n s - E u p h r a t e s , a n d E g y p t 44;
8. T h e E g y p t i a n C a m p a i g n ( 5 2 5 - 5 2 2 )
50;
7. F r o m C y r u s to C a m b y s e s 49;
9. C a m b y s e s a n d the Egyptian
Traditions 55
4. C o n t i n u i t i e s a n d Adaptations:
T h e C a s e of B a b y l o n i a 70;
5. F r o m Bactra to S a r d i s 76;
C o n q u e r e d P o p u l a t i o n s 79;
Authority 89;
62
2. Satraps a n d
9. T h e K i n g a n d the G o d s 9 3 ;
6. Persians a n d
8. Royalty and
(522) 97
114;
107
2. Revolts a n d R e c o n q u e s t s ( 5 2 2 -
5. S u m m a r y a n d Perspectives
vu
137
4. D a r i u s
Contents
viii
139
1. T h e Pursuit of Territorial E x p a n s i o n ( 5 2 0 - 5 1 3 )
Europe
141;
3. T h e Ionian Revolt ( 5 0 0 - 4 9 3 )
Memphis (492-486)
139;
146;
2. T h e Persians in
4. F r o m T h r a c e to
156
PART 2
T H E G R E A T KING
172;
165
2. T h e K i n g a n d H i s Peoples: Inscriptions a n d
4. I m a g e s a n d Realities: T h e K i n g . a m o n g His P e o p l e s
Realities: T h e Imperial Festivals 195;
183;
175;
5. I m a g e s a n d
1. S o u r c e s a n d P r o b l e m s 204;
3. T h e K i n g in M a j e s t y 216;
E a r t h , and the Water 232;
204
6. B e t w e e n M e n a n d G o d s
5. T h e K i n g , the
240
255
2. H o u s e h o l d Staff 258;
4. T h e W o m e n ' s S i d e 277;
6. T h e Royal H u n t s 297;
3. T h e
5. At the G r e a t King's
7. Royal P o m p
299
302
1. T h e G i v i n g K i n g 302;
2. U n e q u a l E x c h a n g e 316;
3. T h e K i n g a n d His
4. T h e K i n g a n d His Faithful:
5. K i n g a n d Satraps 338;
6.
The
347;
352
PART 3
TERRITORIES, POPULATIONS, AND THE D E P E N D E N T
ECONOMY
357
3. L i n e s of C o m m u n i c a t i o n a n d T r a d e 377
2. S a t r a p i e s a n d Tributes 390;
Tribute: M e t a l a n d C o i n 406;
a n d Adaptations 410;
and T r i b u t e L a n d 415
388
399;
3. Gifts and
5. P a y m e n t s of
6. T h e Administration of Tribute: C o n t i n u i t i e s
7. T r i b u t e E c o n o m y a n d Appropriation: Royal L a n d
Contents
ix
Chapter 11. P e r s i a : E m p i r e a n d T r i b u t e E c o n o m y
1. T h e Persepolis Archives 422;
422
2 . Administrative H i e r a r c h y a n d
O r g a n i z a t i o n o f Production 425;
4. Agriculture: P r o d u c e a n d L e v i e s 439;
5. L a n d s a n d E s t a t e s 442;
8. M a n a g e m e n t of S u r p l u s e s 4 5 1 ;
9. L a n d s a n d Peasants 456;
472
2. B a b y l o n i a u n d e r D a r i u s 484;
3. Trans-
4. F r o m J e r u s a l e m to M a g n e s i a on the M e a n d e r 491;
6. Population R e s e t t l e m e n t a n d D e p o r t a t i o n
505;
7. Unity
a n d Diversity 507
PART 4
FROM X E R X E S TO DARIUS I I I : AN EMPIRE IN TURMOIL
Chapter 13. X e r x e s t h e G r e a t K i n g ( 4 8 6 - 4 6 5 )
1. S o u r c e s a n d P r o b l e m s 515;
Sardis to Sardis (480) 528;
515
2. F r o m D a r i u s to X e r x e s 518;
543;
535;
3. F r o m
4. X e r x e s b e t w e e n T w o Fronts ( 4 8 0 - 4 7 9 )
554;
531;
9. X e r x e s ' W e s t e r n
I I . An Assessment 567
C h a p t e r 14. F r o m t h e A c c e s s i o n o f A r t a x e r x e s I t o t h e D e a t h o f
D a r i u s II ( 4 6 5 - 4 0 5 / 4 0 4 )
569
2. T h e E g y p t i a n Revolt (ca. 4 6 4 -
3. T r a n s - E u p h r a t e s Matters 577;
A e g e a n F r o n t 579;
4. T h e Asia M i n o r - E a s t e r n
5. E z r a and N e h e m i a h in J e r u s a l e m 583;
K i n g aftei Another ( 4 2 5 - 4 2 4 )
588;
6. O n e
8. T h e G r e a t K i n g in His C o u n t r i e s 6 0 0
C h a p t e r 15. A r t a x e r x e s II ( 4 0 5 / 4 0 4 - 3 5 9 / 3 5 8 ) a n d A r t a x e r x e s III ( 3 5 9 / 3 5 8 - 3 3 8 )
1. T h e Reign of Artaxerxes II: S o u r c e s a n d P r o b l e m s 612;
T w o Brothers ( 4 0 4 - 4 0 1 )
615;
2. T h e War of the
634;
4. C o n d i t i o n s
5. Agesilaus in Asia
6. A c h a e m e n i d S u c c e s s e s a n d Failures: F r o m Asia
656;
8. At the H e a r t o f Power 6 7 5 ;
9. T h e Wars
. . . 612
Contents
PART 5
THE
693
2. T h e Satrapy of D a s c y l i u m
697;
3. F r o m
4. F r o m C e l a e n a e to H a l i c a r n a s s u s 7 0 5 ;
5. Pixodarus a t X a n t h u s 707;
6. F r o m T a r s u s to M a z a c a 7 0 9 ;
T a r s u s to S a m a r i a via S i d o n a n d J e r u s a l e m 713;
9. E g y p t from Artaxerxes III to D a r i u s III 7 1 7 ,
7. F r o m
8. F r o m G a z a to Petra 716;
10. F r o m Arbela to S u s a 7 1 9 ;
13. F r o m Persepolis to
E c b a t a n a 737:
Cyropolis 743;
15. F r o m E c b a t a n a to
17. F r o m
18. A n
Appraisal a n d S o m e Q u e s t i o n s 7 6 2
Chapter 1 7 . T h e G r e a t K i n g , H i s A n n i e s , a n d H i s T r e a s u r e s
1. T h e Accession of D a r i u s III 769;
769
2. T h e G r e a t K i n g a n d the Persian
Aristocracy 7 8 0 ;
3. T h e Royal A r m i e s 783;
Tribute E c o n o m y
800;
4. S u b j e c t Populations a n d
5. Transition 8 1 2
PART 6
THE
F A L L OF AN E M P I R E ( 3 3 6 - 3 3 0 )
817
2 . D a r i u s a n d H i s Faithful 842;
4. T h e D e a t h o f a G r e a t K i n g (330) 864;
5. T h e Fall of a n E m p i r e 8 6 6
873
Research Notes
877
List of Abbreviations
1053
Bibliography
1059
Indexes
1125
Index of Sources
Index of Personal Names
Index of Divine Names .
Index of Geographical Names
Index of Ancient Words
Index of Topics
1125
1149
1161
1162
1173
1180
List of Illustrations
Maps
1. The Ionian Revolt
147
366
367
639
after D u g a s ! 9 ! 0
727
6. Lands and peoples of the Iranian Plateau and Central Asia under
Achaemenid rule
744
755
Genealogies
From Artaxerxes I to Artaxerxes II
571
773
Figures
1. Pyramidal tomb at Sardis
87
Cabill 1988
2. Tomb of Cyrus
87
Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1982: 76
3. Tomb at Buzpar
87
87
Cahill 1988
89
Stronach 1978
91
Sancisi-Weerdcnberg 1982: 79
91
8. Relief at Behistun
125
List of Illustrations
xi:
10. Peoples bearing the throne (Persepolis: Hall of the Hundred Columns) .
Walser 1966
13. Darius and his court as seen in a Greek painting of the fourth century . .
Hamdf and Reinach, Necropole royak de Sidon, 1892: 290
22. Throne Hall, east jamb of the eastern doorway of the southern wall
Ghirshman 1957: fig. 8
24. Throne Hall, south jamb of the northern doorway in the western wall:
Combat of Royal Hero with a griffin
G h i r s h m a n 1957: fig. 9
1979
List of Illustrations
29. Hunt scenes on seals: a seal of Darius, showing the king hunting a lion;
inscribed seal depicting a "Mede" hunting a wild hoar
xiii
232
235
236
237
244
a: plaque from the treasury at Oxus (Porada 1963: fig. 84); b: stela from Dascylium
( C u m o n t , Religions orientates, fig. 10); c: seal from the Treasury at Persepolis
(Houtkamp 1991: fig. 1); d: seal impression from Dascylium (Mellink 1988: fig. 12b)
e: animal-sacrifice scene (Moorey 1988: fig. 44b); f: relief on the tomb o f a "Mede"
from Qyzapan (Porada 1963: fig. 71)
34. Ahura-Mazda
248
G h i r s h m a n 1957: fig. 7
249
250
Houtkamp 1991
37. Anahita: (a) the king before Anahita? (b) representation of Anahita?
253
Moorey 1979
260
C D A F / 4 ( 1 9 7 4 ) , fig. 17
266
M i n n s 1913
292
G h i r s h m a n 1957: fig. 5
295
299
Perrot and C h i p i e z
306
473
C A H I V , fig. 20
480
C A H I V , fig. 21
483
C A H I V , fig. 22
486
Graziani 1989
490
xiv
List of Illustrations
504
606
nos. 48 and 17), (f) port scene on a Treasury Tablet from Persepolis ( C A H I V ,
fig. 3); (g) Assyrian king in chariot; (h) satrap or dynast on a satrap's sarcophagus
(Kleeman 1958: Taf. 32a)
611
667
671
673
Borchhardt 1976b
699
D o n e e ! a n d V o u t e 1984
700
2
704
Masson 1987a
708
710
712
61. Coins from Samaria and sealings from the Wadi ed-Daliyeh
715
Meshorer and Qedar 1991 - ( a ) no. 41; (b) no. 50; (c) no. 16; (d) no. 14; (e) no 58
722
Legiain 1925
734
735
65.
807
Translation
The text of the book that is presented here to English-speaking readers differs very
little from the French edition published by Editions Fayard in June, 1996. Yet during
the first stage in the process of translation, in the late 1996 and early 1997,1 had hoped
to make systematic modifications and additions to the original text in a way that took account of publications which had appeared after the latest revisions to the French manuscript, in September 1995. A succession of delays in the preparation of the American
translation dissuaded me from carrying out this enterprise, and here I would like to explain my decision to my readers.
I have chosen to present updates and very detailed assessments of research in another form, the Bulletin d'Histoire Achemenide (BHAch), organized in a way that follows the thematic structure of my book. Its aim is to give scholars periodic opportunities
not only to become acquainted with recent bibliography, but also to have a critical
analysis of it. The first number {BHAch I) took the form of a long article published in
Supplement 1 to the journal Topoi (1997, pp. 5-127).' In it, I analyzed about 450 titles
(articles and books) published between October 1995 and October 1997. The second
Bulletin {BHAch II) appeared in 2001, in book form. Following the same plan, I analyzed more than 800 titles published between October 1997 and October 2000. To make
it easier to use, BHAch II is accompanied by indexes which also cover the material in
BHAch I. One of those indexes (pp. 327-30) makes it possible for readers to find the
pages in my 1996 book that need to be revised in the light of new publications. Furthermore, the recent creation of a website specifically devoted to Achaemenid research
1
1. I point out that Ursula Weber and JoscF Wicsclibfcr have brought out an enormous Achaemenid
xv
XVI
(www.acliemenet.com) also gives scholars access to documentary and bibliographic resources on a continuing basis.
I have discussed one of the methodological questions raised by a systematic update,
a question that is not limited to Achaemenid studies, in the "Noruz Lecture" presented
at the Foundation for Iranian Studies (Washington, D.C., March 23, 2001) under the
title "New Trends in Achaemenid History." There, with reference to the updates in
BHAch1 and II, I stated:
5
When one strives to follow and evaluate research and publication on a day-to-day basis and
in an exhaustive manner, one unavoidably develops a permanent habit of painful epistemological questioning of the real results of the research. This question is particularly difficult
to resolve in the Humanities, where accumulated erudition and bibliographic tautology
sometimes take the place of evidence that is accepted but misleading for scientific innovation. To speak bluntly: what is really new in what is published recently? In our domain, what
are the signs that permit us to assert that this or that study marks progress in the order of
knowledge? The answer may seem easy as long as one is dealing with publications of documents, but it is quite a different matter when one considers interpretive publications. And
even among publications of documents one has to make distinctions: some of them add
only one unpublished document in a series that is already known, without modifying the
general sense by much; others, on the other hand, call attention to documentation that in
itself may suggest wholly new lines of interpretation.
Then, after presenting results from excavations at Ayn Manawir in Egypt, I concluded:
In this respect, the discoveries and publications on Achaemenid Egypt that I have presented
in brief are not justrece?it, they are really new, and they open prospects of fundamental new
growth in the near future.
My point is that a thorough updating cannot be brought about in a satisfactory manner
only with hundreds of bibliographic additions, heaped up one on the other. As publications accumulate, so the risk increases of burdening the text and the bibliographic
notes with updates superimposed over one another, and of making the text more difficult to consult rather than more useful. Furthermore, in such a case the appearance of
exhaustiveness would be largely an illusion, for two reasons. First, any book, however
up-to-date its bibliography may be, is subject to some bibliographic lapse by the time it
has appeared. Furthermore, as I have indicated, many added references really add
7
5. T h e creation of this web site also responds to purposes specific to the overall framework of Achaemenid history, that is, an a i m to transform what has been a virtual scientific c o m m u n i t y into an actual
scientific community: see my "Call for Collaboration" (Paris, 2000), available for downloading at
http://www.achcmcnt.com/pdf7call.pdf, as well as the proceedings of a colloquium that I organized at
the C o l l e g e de France, D e c . 15-16, 2000, "Achaemenid History and Data Bases on the Internet: an
Assessment of Work in Progress and Prospects for Future Developments," available at http/Avww.
achemenet.com/pdf/colloque/resumcs.pdf. With the agreement of the editors of Topoi, the entire text
of BHAch 1 can be found on the site at http://www.achemenet.com/bibliographies/l)hachI.htm.
6. An English version is available at http://www.fis-iran.org/achcnieiiid.htni; the French text is
available at http://ww.achemenet.com/rcssources/enligne/jasr/jasr01/htm under the title "L'histoire de
I'empire a c h e m e n i d e aujourd'hui: nouvelles tendances, nouvelles perspectives."
7. By way of example, I may mention that as 1 write this preface, in early July, 2001, the provisional
bibliographic list for BHAch III (which is intended to appear in 2003) already includes more than 150
titles, including some important books and articles.
xvi 1
nothing new, so it would be necessary to introduce a clear hierarchical distinction between "recent" and "new," and to justify in detail the criteria for selectionprecisely as
I tried to do in my Bulletins of 1997 and 2001.
All this being so, I freely admit that taking into account the most innovative publications that appeared between 1995 and 2000 would make it possible to amend and detail
many of the discussions in this book and to enrich significantly the iconographic documentation. If I have chosen nonetheless to present the American version practically in
the same form as the initial French book, it is also because I have judged whether
rightly or wrongly the reader may decide-that the general image of the Achaemenid
Empire that I expounded in 1996 has not been fundamentally modified.
Consider a particularly significant example, Chapter 16, in which I present a regional
analysis of the empire and attempt an interpretation of relations between center and periphery, in the form of a prospective assessment (pp. 693ff.). T h e point of view that I
adopt and defend there is that the documents discovered between about 1970 and 1995
put in serious doubt the "(pseudo-)statistical hypothesis of a scanty Persian presence and
an inconsequential imperial occupation, based on bodies of evidence that are obsolete
or reduced to a regional perspective" (p. 764). For this purpose, in the corresponding
documentary notes (pp. 1029-1031) I present an assessment of recent discoveries, region
by region. On the face of it, this section should be rewritten, since many new discoveries
made available since 1995 ought to be included. But even if some discoveries treated in
the 1996 version of the text remain under discussion, I believe that overall the documents published between 1995 and 2000 tend rather to confirm the historical interpretation that I presented in the book, whether in the matter of the maintenance of organic
links between central authority and the provinces, or in the matter of the policy
adopted toward local or national sanctuaries, or in the matter of the spread and adaptation of Persian imagery in various countries, or even in the matter of the economic
condition of the empire at the arrival of Alexander. At the same time, wherever one or
another interpretation has given rise to reservations and/or polemics, the reader can easily come to grips with it by consulting BHAc/i I and II and the indexes of BHAch I I .
8
10
11
12
8. For example, concerning the interpretation of the Elamite tablets found in Armenia (French
edition, pp. 9 6 2 - 6 3 ; below p. 938), see the treatments discussed in BHAch I, 25 and BHAc/i II, 44. T h e
discussion is obviously not closed.
9. T o take only one example, the discovery of settlements, qanats, and hundreds of demotic documents dated to the reigns of Artaxerxes I and Darius II at the site of Ayn Manawir is particularly striking
(see most recently BIFAO 100 [2000], 4 6 9 - 7 9 , as well as the description of the work by Michel Wuttmann at http://www.achemcnet.com/recherche/sites/aynmanawir/aynmanawir.htm, a n d my Temarks in
BHAch I, 32-34 and 8 8 - 9 0 , and II, 62, and in A r m i e s 1999/5, 1130-35). T h e new discoveries tend to
support the position that 1 took on pp. 520 and 1006-08 on the maintenance of links between the center
and the Egyptian province throughout the fifth century B.C.
10. O n these topics, to which I return at various points in the book, sec now the specific treatments
in BHAch I, 94-97, II, 176-184 (on religious policy), a n d I, 98-104, II, 911-206 (on the spread of
images).
11. T h e discovery of a network of qanats at Ayn Manawir also contributes to the discussion on
pp. 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 about the relationship between the levying of tribute and investments in production, that
is, about the e c o n o m i c rationality of the Achaemenid imperial system; see the studies collected in
Pierre Briant, ed., Irrigation et drainage dans I'Antiquite: qanats et canalisations souterraines en Iran, en
&g)'pte eten Grece (Collection Persika 2; Paris: Editions T h o t m , 2001).
12.
XVIII
In short, in order to be full and effective, a revision would have to be carried out on a
strategy that is both selective and synthetic. But to do so would involve no more or less
than writing a new book, or at least a fundamentally altered book. That is not the purpose of the American translation made available today. The purpose is simply to put before English-speaking readers a book that was published in French five years ago. My
book of 1996 represents a state-of-the-question , valid at a given moment, of the work carried out by many scholars, as well as a the state of my own historical reflections. Readers
of the French edition and of the American edition can easily avail themselves of the several reviews published since the appearance of the Histoire de I'empire perse in 1996.
And if they want to know about the development of the author's thought, including his
pentimenti, they can also consult the bibliographic tools that I have made available, as
well as the updates that I have published, both on primary documents" and on problems of historiography and method. 1 have no doubt that readers will be able to dispute
the theses and interpretations of this book on the basis of their own thinking, but also in
the light of publications that are recent and sometimes even publications that are new.
15
14
16
13. T h i s is the consideration that eventually dissuaded m e from introducing new and important
iconographic documents that can be found with reproductions and commentaries in BHAch 1 (pp. 11,
16, 18, 21f., 26f, 34, 41, 67, 69, 74, 101) and BHAch II (pp. 34, 36, 40f, 43, 45, 47f., 58, 601, 64, 69, 76,
110f, 116, 192, 195f., 198f, 202f., 205), though it would be technically simple to do so. T h e main and
indispensable correction to illustrations in the French publication consists of adding to the list of illustrations (pp. xiff.) an indication of the source of the drawings reproduced here, unfortunately forgotten
in the page proofs of the 1996 French version.
14. A list can be found in BHAch II, 9 n. 8. As usual, s o m e are merely descriptive, while others
present a deeper consideration of Achaemenid history today (see especially Matthew Stolper, "Une 'vision dure' de l'histoire a c h e m e n i d e (Note critique)," Annates 1999/5: 1109-26).
15. In particular, I have published drastic revisions of s o m e Greek inscriptions pertinent to Achaemenid history, namely the inscription of Droaphernes and the Xanthus Trilingual in two articles published in 1998 ("Droaphernes et la statue d e Sardes," in M . Brosius and A. Kuhrt, eds., Studies in Persian
History: Essays in Memory of David M. Lewis, Achaemenid History, 11 (Leiden), 205-26; "CitGs et satrapes dan I'Empire achemenide: Pix6daros ctXanthos," CRAI: 305-40) and the letter of Darius to G a datas in a study in press (available in pre-publication form at http://www.achemenet.com/ressources/
souspresse/manuscritsOl.htm). In the latter article I concluded that the d o c u m e n t is a falsification, of
Roman date, and I therefore propose that it should be eliminated from discussions of Achaemenid history. Given that this is one of the most celebrated documents in Achaemenid historiography, it is also
one of the texts most frequently cited in my book (see the index, p. 000, s.v. M L 12). T h i s last example
shows clearly how difficult it would have been to patch up the original text in a satisfactory manner.
16. For example: " T h e Achaemenid Empire," in K. Raaflaub and N. Rosenstein, eds., Soldiers, So-
ciety and War in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998) 10 5-28;
"L'histoire de I'empire a c h e m e n i d e aiijoiii'd'hiii: 1'historien et ses documents," Annates 1999/5, 112736; "Inscriptions multilingues d'epoque achemenide: le texte et l'imagc," in D. Valbelle and J . Leclant,
eds., Le decret de Memphis (Actcs du C o l l o q u e de la Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris l ' Juin 1999)
(Paris: de Boccard, 2000), 9 1 - 1 1 5 ; "Histoire impdriale et histoire regionale. A propos de l'histoire cle
Juda dans I'Empire achemenide,"in A. Lemaire and N . S a b o e , eds., Congress Volume Oslo 1998 ( V T
Suppl. 80; 2000) 2 3 5 - 4 5 ; "Darius III face a Alexandre: mythe, histoire, legende," Annuaire du College
c
de France, Resume des cours et conferences W9-2Q00 (Paris, 2000) 7 8 1 - 9 2 (also available at http-//www.
college-de-francc.fr/college/annuaire-scientifique/coius99-2000/bnant/briant.pdf);
I^cou
inaugurate