Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I have not finished revising, so I will send you another revised syllabus soon. Please
disregard the earlier deletions that I made during our last class in December.
For our class on Thurs, please read Rules 9 and 11 and all cases under them.
For Sat, please read Rules 10, 12, 13 and 14 and all cases under them, but for Rule 14 only cases under "N. Summons".
Thanks.
6.
Quesada vs. DOJ, 500 SCRA 454
7.
Ngo Bun Tiong vs. Judge Sayo, 163 SCRA 237
8.
Ella vs. Salonga 35 SCRA 86
9.
Villamor vs. Salas, 203 SCRA 540
10. Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34
11. Tijam vs. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29
12. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399
13. De la Cruz vs. Court of Appeals, 510 SCRA 103
14. Sta. Clara Homeowners vs. Gaston, 374 SCRA 396
15. Sun Insurance Office vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274
16. Ballatan vs. Court of Appeals, 304 SCRA 34
17. Yuchengco vs. Republic, 333 SCRA 368
18. Vda. De Murga vs. Chan, 25 SCRA 441 (1968)
19. Heirs of Valeriano Concha vs. Spouses Gregorio Lumocso, 540 SCRA 1
20. Agustinvs.Bacalan,135SCRA340
21. Mangaliag vs. Catubig-Pastoral, 474 SCRA 153
22. Sps. Bejer vs. CA, G.R. No. 79404, January 27, 1989
23. Zamora vs. Heirs of Carmen, G.R. No. 146195, November 18, 2004
24. Aquino vs. Abre, February 18, 2008
25. Baares, et al. vs. Balising, et al, G.R. No. 132624, March 13, 2000
26. Diaz vs. Gestopa, A.M.-MTJ-11-1786, June 22, 2011
B. General Provisions
1. Real Action and Personal Action, distinguished
2. Action in Personam, Action in Rem, & Action Quasi in Rem,
distinguished
Required Readings
Laws: Rule 1 General Provisions - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
Y u vs. Pacleb, 580 SCRA
197
2.
Domagas vs. Jensen, 448 SCRA 663
3.
Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 315 SCRA 600
4.
Tamano vs. Ortiz, 291 SCRA 584
5.
La Tondea Distillers vs. Ponferrada, 264 SCRA 540
6.
Cabutihan vs. Landcenter Construction, 383 SCRA 353
7.
Citizen Surety vs. Melencio-Herrera, 38 SCRA 369
8.
Go vs. UCPB, G.R. No. 156187, 442 SCRA 264
9.
Gochan vs. Gochan 372 SCRA 356
10. Manchester Development Corp. vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562
11. Sun Insurance Office vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274
12. Tacoy vs. RTC of Tagum, 180 SCRA 433
13. AyalaCorp.vs.Madayag, 181 SCRA 687
14. Negros Oriental Planters Association vs. Hon. Presiding Judge of Negros,
575 SCRA575
C. Cause of Action
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 2 Cause of Action - 1 to 6
Cases:
1. Joseph vs. Bautista, February 23, 1989
2. Monzon vs. Spouses Relova vs. Addio Properties, Inc., 565 SCRA 514
3. Philippine National Construction Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 514
SCRA 569 4.
5. Viewmaster Construction Corporation vs. Roxas, 335 SCRA 540
6. San Lorenzo Village Association, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 115
5.
Anita Mangila vs. Court of Appeals, 387 SCRA 162
6.
Spouses Lantin vs. Lantion, 499 SCRA 718
7.
Sweetlines vs. Teves, May 19, 1978
8.
Unimasters Conglomeration, Inc. vs. CA, 267 SCRA 759
9.
Pacific Consultants vs. Schonfeld, 516 SCRA 209
10. Hyatt Elevators vs. Goldstar Elevators, G.R. No. 161026, October 24,
2005
G. Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts and Kinds of Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 5 Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts - 1 and 2
2.
Rule 6 Kinds of Pleadings - 1 to 13
a.
4 to 6, 9, 19 to 20 of 1991 Revised Rule on Summary Procedure
b.
5 to 7, 11, 13 to 14 of Rule of Procedure for Small Claims
Cases:
1.
International Container Terminal Services, Inc. vs. CA, 214 SCRA 456
2.
Metals Engineering Resources Corp. vs. CA, 203 SCRA 273
3.
Financial Bldg. Corp. vs. Forbes Park, G.R. No. 133119, August 17,
2000
4.
Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, G.R. No. 170354, 494 SCRA 393
5.
Santo Tomas University Hospital vs. Surla, 294 SCRA 382
6.
Torres vs. CA, G.R. No. L-25889, January 17, 1973, 49 SCRA 674
7.
Anaya vs. Palaroa, 36 SCRA 97 (1970)
8.
Balbastro, et al. vs. CA, 48 SCRA 232 (1972)
9.
Rubio vs. Mariano, 52 SCRA 338 (1973)
10. Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), 332 SCRA 82
H. Parts of Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 7 Parts of Pleadings - 1 to 5
2. Resolution of the Supreme Court En Banc dated June 3, 2008 (Bar
Matter 1922)
Cases:
1.
Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank vs. Court of Appeals, 332
SCRA 241
2.
Gochan vs. Gochan, 372 SCRA 256
3.
Republic vs. Kenrick Development Corp., 498 SCRA 220, August 8,
2006
4.
Argallon-Jocson and Tusing vs. CA, 594 SCRA 343
5.
Vicar International Construction vs. FEB leasing and Finance, 456
SCRA 588
6.
Robern Development Corp vs. Quitain, 315 SCRA 150
7.
Maranaw Hotels and Resort Corp vs. CA, 575 SCRA 463
8.
Huibonhoa vs. Concepcion, 497 SCRA 562
9.
San Miguel Corporation vs. Aballa, 461 SCRA 392
10. National Steel Corporation vs. CA, 388 SCRA 85
11. Vallacar Transit, Inc. vs. Jocelyn Catubig, G.R. No. 17752
12. Vda. De Hermoso vs. PNB, June 1, 2011
I. Manner of Making Allegations in Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 8 Manner of Making Allegations in Pleadings - 1 to 12
Cases:
1.
Caete vs. Genuino Ice Co., 542 SCRA 206
2.
La Mallorca vs. Court of Appeals, 17 SCRA 729
3.
Toribio vs. Bidin, 134 SCRA 162
4.
Imperial Textile Mills vs. CA, 183 SCRA 584
5.
Hibberd vs. Rhode 32 Phil 476
6.
Central Surety and Insurance Co. vs. Hodges, 38 SCRA 159
7.
Guevarra vs. Eala, 529 SCRA 1
8.
Philippine American General Insurance Co. et al vs. Sweet Lines, 212
SCRA 194
J. Effect of Failure to Plead and When to File Responsive Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 9 Effect of Failure to Plead - 1 to 3
2. Rule 11 When to file Responsive Pleadings - 1 to 11
Cases:
Rule 9
1.
Ferrer vs. Ericta, 84 SCRA 705
2.
Garcia vs. Mathis, 100 SCRA 250
3.
Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, 494 SCRA 393
4.
Ponciano vs. Parentela, 331 SCRA 605, May 9, 2000
5.
Gojo vs. Goyala, 35 SCRA 557
6.
Liam Law vs. Olympic Sawmill CO. And Elino Lee Chi, G.R. No. L30771, May 28, 1984
7.
Meliton vs. CA, 216 SCRA 485
8.
Korea Technologies Co. Ltd. Vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA 1
9.
Cavili vs. Florendo, 154 SCRA 610
10. Gajudo vs. Traders Royal Bank, 485 SCRA 108
11. Pascua vs. Florendo, 136 SCRA 208
12. Laus vs. CA, 219 SCRA 688
13. Philippine British Co. Inc. vs. delos Angeles, 63 SCRA 50
14. De Guia vs. De Guia, 356 SCRA 287
15. Lina vs. Court of Appeals, 35 SCRA 637
16. Torres vs. CA, 49 SCRA 67
17. Lorbes vs. CA, 351 SCRA 716
Rule 11
1.
Naga Development Corporation vs. CA, 41 SCRA 105
2.
Amante vs. Sunga, 64 SCRA 192
3.
Sarmiento vs. Juan, 120 SCRA 403
4.
Barraza vs. Campos, 120 SCRA 881
5.
Luna vs. Mirafuente, A.M. No. MTJ-05-1610, September 26, 2005
K. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 10 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings - 1 to 8
Cases:
1.
Paeste vs. Jaurigue, 94 Phil 179
2.
Bautista vs. Maya-Maya Cottages, Inc., 476 SCRA 416
3.
Alpine Lending Investors vs. Corpuz, 508 SCRA 45
4.
Siasoco vs. CA, 303 SCRA 186
5.
Philippine Ports Authority vs. WG&A, January 28, 2008
6.
Campos Rueda vs. Bautista, 6 SCRA 240
7.
Gumabay vs. Baralin, 77 SCRA 258
8.
Azola Farms vs. CA, 442 SCRA 133
9.
Verzosa vs. CA, 299 SCRA 100
10. Swagman Hotels and Travel, Inc. vs. CA, 455 SCRA 175
11.
Magaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193
12. Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), 332 SCRA 82
9.
Pacsports Phils., Inc. vs. Niccolo Sports, G.R. No. 141602, November
22, 2001
10. Linzag vs. CA, 291 SCRA 304
11. Hacienda Bigaa, Inc. vs. Chavez, G.R. No. 174160, April 20, 2010
12. Fels Energy Inc. vs. Province of Batangas, G.R. No. 168557, February 19,
2007
13. Sempio vs. CA, 284 SCRA 580
R. Motion to Dismiss
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 16 Motion to Dismiss - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
De Los Reyes vs. CA, 285 SCRA 705
2.
Aznar vs. Bernad, 161 SCRA 276
3.
Landayan vs. Bacani, 117 SCRA 117
4.
Dulay vs. CA, 243 SCRA
5.
Suyom vs. Collantes, 69 SCRA 514
6.
Tan vs. Director of Forestry, 125 SCRA 302
7.
Peregrina vs. Panis, 133 SCRA 729
8.
Pineda vs. CFI, 111 Phil 643 (1961)
9.
Y uvienco vs. Dacuycuy,
104 SCRA
668
10. Bank of America vs. CA, 400 SCRA 156
11. AssociatedBankvs.SpousesMontano, 604 SCRA 134
12.
Lu Ym vs. Gertrudes Nabua, 452 SCRA 298
S. Dismissal of Actions
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 17 Dismissal of Actions - 1 to 4
Cases:
1.
Republic Planters Bank vs. Molina, 166 SCRA 36
2.
PCI Leasing Finance, Inc. vs. Milan, 617 SCRA 258
3.
Meliton vs. CA, 216 SCRA 485
4.
Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, 494 SCRA 393
T. Pre-Trial
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 18 Pre-Trial - 1 to 7
2. 7 and 8, Rule on Summary Procedure
3. 18 Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases
4. Admin. Circular No. 03-1-09-SC (July 13, 2004)
5. OCA Circular 51-2011 CAM/JDR
Cases:
1.
Martinez vs. De La Merced, 174 SCRA 182
2.
Sarmiento vs. Juan, 120 SCRA 403
3.
Paredes vs. Verano, 504 SCRA 264
4.
Tria vs. Lirag, G.R. No. L-13994, April 29, 1961
5.
Zagala vs. Jimenez, 152 SCRA 147
6.
Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), 332 SCRA 82
U. Intervention
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 19 Intervention - 1 to 4
Cases:
1.
Mactan Cebu International vs. Heirs of Minoza, February 2, 2011
2.
Big Country Ranch Corp vs. CA, 227 SCRA 161
3.
Barangay Matictic vs. Elbinias, 148 SCRA 83
4.
MBTC vs. Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 89909, September 21, 1990
5. Batama Farmers Cooperative Marketing vs. Rosal, 42 SCRA 408
6.
Magsaysay-Labrador vs. CA, 180 SCRA 266
7.
Looyuko vs. CA, G.R. No. 102696, July 12, 2001
8.
Bon-Mar Realty vs. de Guzman, G.R. No. 182136, August 29, 2008
9.
Executive Secretary vs. Northeast Freight, 581 SCRA 76
V. Calendar of Cases, Subpoena, and Computation of Time
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 20 Calendar of Cases - 1 to 2
2. Rule 21 Subpoena - 1 to 10
3. Rule 22 Computation of Time - 1 to 2
Cases:
1.
People vs. Montejo, 21 SCRA 722
2.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Primetown Property, 531 SCRA
436
W. Depositions Pending Action and Depositions Before Action or
Pending Appeal
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 23 Depositions Pending Action - 1 to 29
2.
Rule 24 Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal - 1 to 7
Cases:
1.
Fortune Corporation vs. CA, G.R. No. 108119, January 19, 1994
2.
Koh vs, IAC, September 23, 1986
3.
Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, November 21, 1991
4.
Camus de Lopez vs. Maceren, August 31, 1954, 95 Phil 753
5.
Caguiat vs. Torres, 30 SCRA 106
6.
Dasmarinas Garments Inc. vs. Reyes, 225 SCRA 622
7.
Cariaga vs. CA, 358 SCRA 583
X. Interrogatories to Parties, Admission by Adverse Party, Production
or Inspection of Documents or Things, Physical and Mental
Examination of Persons, and Refusal to Comply with Modes of
Discovery
Required Readings Laws:
1. Rule 25 Interrogatories to Parties - 1 to 5
2. Rule 26 Admission By Adverse Party - 1 to 5
3. Rule 27 Production or Inspection of Documents or Things - 1
4. Rule 28 Physical and Mental Examination of Persons - 1 to 4
5. Rule 29 Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery - 1 to 6
Cases:
1.
Marcelo vs. Sandiganbayan, 531 SCRA 385
2.
Arellano vs. CFI of Sorsogon, G.R. No. L-34897, July 15, 1975, 65 SCRA
46
3.
Uy Chao vs. De La Rama Steamship, 6 SCRA 69
4.
DBP vs. CA, 470 SCRA 317
5.
Nestle Phils., Inc. vs. CA, 375 SCRA 543
6.
7.
8.
10
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20,
11
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
12
7.
Bugarin vs. Palisoc, December 2, 2005
8.
Carpol vs. Sulu Resource Development Corp., August 8, 2002
9.
St. Martin Funeral Homes vs. NLRC, 295 SCRA 494
10. CebuWomensClubvs.DeLaVictoria,327SCRA533
11. People vs. Espinosa, August 15, 2003
12. Salvador vs. MApa, November 28, 2007
13. Habaluyas Enterprises vs. Japson, 142 SCRA 208
14. Catholic Bishop of Balanga vs. CA, G.R. No. 112519, November 14,
1996
15. Capacete vs. Baroro, G.R. No. 154184, July 8, 2003
FF. Original Cases, Annulment of Judgment or Final Orders and
Resolutions, Preliminary Conference, Oral Argument, Dismissal of
Appeal, Judgment, Motion for Reconsideration, New Trial, Internal
Business (CA), Publication of Judgments and Final Resolutions (CA),
and Original and Appealed Cases (SC)
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 46 Original Cases - 1 to 7
2.
Rule 47 Annulment of Judgment or Final Orders and Resolutions - 1
to 10
3.
Rule 48 - Preliminary Conference - 1 to 3
4.
Rule 49 Oral Argument - 1 to 3
5.
Rule 50 Dismissal of Appeal - 1 to 3
6.
Rule 51 Judgment - 1 to 11
7.
Rule 52 Motion for Reconsideration - to 4
8.
Rule53NewTrial-to4
9.
Rule 54 Internal Business (CA)- 1 to 2
10. Rule 55 Publication of Judgments and Final Resolution (CA)- 1 to 3
11. Rule 56 Original and Appealed Cases (SC) - 1 to 7
Article VIII, s 4,13,14, 15, 1987 Philippine Constitution
A.M. 10-4-20-SC (May 4, 2010)
Article 8, Civil Code of the Philippines
Cases:
1.
Guy vs. CA, 539 SCRA 584
2.
Molina vs. CA, January 13, 2003
3.
NYK International vs. NLRC, February 17, 2003
4.
Shipside, Inc. vs. CA, February 20, 2001
5.
Vanguard Assurance Corporation vs. CA, 64 SCRA 148
6.
Roman Catholic Archbishop vs. CA, June 19, 1991
7.
People vs. Jabinal, 55 SCRA 607
8.
Navarro vs. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 180050, April12, 2011
9.
League of Cities vs. Comelec, G.R. Nos. 176951, 177499, 178056, April
12, 2011
10. Heirs of Maura So vs. Obliosca, 542 SCRA 406
11. Ramos vs. Pepsi Cola, G.R. No. L-22533, February 9, 1967
GG. Preliminary Attachment
Required Readings Laws:
Rule 57 Preliminary Attachment
A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC
Section 13, Rule 39
Articles 153 and 157, Family Code of the Philippines
Cases:
1.
Peregrina vs. Panis G.R. No. 56011, October 31, 1984
2.
Carpio vs. Macadaeg 9 SCRA 552 (1963)
13
3.
Adyawan vs. T orres, July 5,
1994
4.
Aboitiz & Co. vs. Provincial Sheriff L-35990, June 17, 1981
5.
Filinvest Credit Corp. vs. Relova G.R. No. 50378, September 30, 1982
6.
Davao Light and Power vs. Court of Appeals, November 29, 1991
7.
Oate vs. Abrogar G.R. No. 107491, February 23, 1995
8.
Mangila vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 125027, August 12, 2002
9.
Uy vs. Court of Appeals 191 SCRA 275 (1990)
10. Calderon vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, November 11, 1987
11. National Bureau of Investigation vs. Tuliao A.M. P-96-1184, March 24,
1997
12. Escovilla vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 84497, November 6, 1989
13. Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation vs. Yllas Lending Corp. G.R.
No. 158997, October 6, 2008
14. Pioneer Insurance & Surety vs. Hontanosas L-35951, August 31, 1977
15. Lucila Magaling et. al., vs. Peter Ong G.R. No. 17333, August 13, 2008
16. Consolidated Bank vs. IAC, G.R. No. 73976, May 29, 1982
17. Carlos vs. Sandoval 471 SCRA 266, November 9, 1977
18. Spouses Yu vs. Ngo Yee Te G.R. No. 155868, February 6, 2007
19. Leelin Marketing Corp. vs. IES Agro Development Co. L-38971, April
28, 1983
HH. Preliminary Injunction
Required Readings Laws:
1.
Rule 58 Preliminary Injunction
2.
.
9(1) B.P . Blg. 129
3.
A.M. 99-10-5-0
4.
P .D. 1818
5.
P .D. 605
6.
Republic Act No. 8975 (November 7, 2000)
7.
R.A. No. 7653, 25
Cases:
1.
Estares vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 144755, June 8, 2005
2.
Mabuyo Farms Inc. vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 140058, August 1,
2002
3.
China Banking Corporation vs. Co G.R. No. 174569, September 17,
2008
4.
Light Rail Transit Authority vs. Court of Appeals, Novemebr 25, 2004
5.
Bacolod City Water District vs. Labayen 446 SCRA 110, December 10,
2004
6.
Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Fernando Pampanga vs. Soriano, et
al, G.R. No. 153829 and G.R. No. 160909, August 17, 2011
7.
Medina vs. Judge Canon, A.M. RTJ-11-298, February 22, 2012
8.
Ortigas vs. CA G.R. No. 79128, June 16, 1983
9.
Merville Park Homeowners vs. Velez G.R. No. 82985, April 22, 1991
10. Buyco vs. Baraquia, G.R. No. 177486, December 21, 2009
11. Heirs of the late J.B.L. Reyes vs. CA 338 SCRA 282
12. Philippine National Bank vs. Ritratto Group, July 31, 2001
13. Brocka vs. Enrile 192 SCRA 182
14. Medina vs. Greenfield Development G.R. No. 140228, November 19,
2004
15. China Banking Corp vs. CA, December 5, 1996
16. Hutchinson Ports Phils. vs. SBMA, August 31, 2000
17. Nische vs. Equitable-PCI Bank, February 19, 2007
18. Director of the Bureau of Telecommunications vs. Aligaen L-31135, May
29, 1970
19. Aquinovs.SocorroG.R.No.23868,October22,1970
20. Zuo vs. Cabredo, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1779, 402 SCRA 75
21. Filipino Metals, Corp vs. Secretary of DTI, G.R. No. 157498, July 15,
2005
14
Declaratory Relief
1.
DBM vs. Manilas Finest Retirees Association, G.R. No. 169446, May 9,
2007
2.
Tano vs. Socrates G.R. No. 110249, August 14, 1997
3. Martelino vs. NHMF Corp. G.R. No. 160208, June 30, 2008
4.
Singson vs. Republic, January 30, 1968
5.
De la Llana vs. COMELEC, December 9, 1977
6.
Velasco vs. Villegas G.R. No. L-24153, February 14, 1983
15
16
3.
Expropriation
1.
Republic vs. Gingoyon G.R. No. 166429, December 19, 2005
2.
National Power Corp. vs. Manubay Agro-Industrial G.R. No. 150936,
August 18, 2004 3. Republic vs. CA and Heirs of Cris Santos G.R. No.
146587, July 2, 2002
4.
Jesus is Lord Christian School Foundation vs. City of Pasig G.R. No.
152230, August 9, 2005
5.
Robern Development Corp. vs. Quitain, 315 SCRA 150
6.
Republic vs. vda. De Castello, 58 SCRA 336
Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage
1.
Limpin vs. IAC 166 SCRA 88, September 29, 1988
2.
BPI Family Savings Bank vs. Sps Veloso 436 SCRA 1, August 9, 2004
Partition
1.
Figuracion Gerilla vs. vda. De Figuracion G.R. No. 154322, August 22,
2006
2.
Rugian vs. Rugian, 9 Phil 527 (1908)
Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
1.
Valdez vs. CA G.R. No. 132426, May 2, 2006
2.
Sampoyan vs. CA, January 14, 2005
3.
Republic of the Philippines and NAPOCOR vs. Sunvar Realty
Development Corporation, G.R. No.194880, June 20, 2012
4.
Sarmiento vs. CA, November 16, 1995
5.
Co vs. Militar 41 SCRA 455, January 29, 2004
6.
Duran vs. CA, May 2, 2006
7.
Unida vs. Urban G.R. No. 155432, June 9, 2005
8.
Spouses Calendacion vs. Larano G.R. No. 158231, June 19, 2007
9.
Bugarin vs. Palisoc, December 2, 2005
10. Montenegro vs. Montenegro G.R. No. 156829, June 8, 2004
Contempt
1.
Ang vs. Castro G.R. No. 66371, May 15, 1985
2.
People vs. Godoy 243 SCRA 64, March 29, 1995
3.
Pimentel, Jr. vs. Majaducon, July 29, 2003
4.
Lorenzo Shipping Corp et al vs. Distribution Management Association
of the Philippines et al, G.R. No. 155849, August 31, 2011
III. COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING SYSTEM
40% Recitation 20% Midterm Exam 40% Final Exam
IV. CONTACT INFORMATION
Only the class beadle is allowed to contact the professor and shall be given
his email address/mobile phone no. Request for consultation shall be
entertained only during class hours and in the presence of the beadle.
17