Harvard's Physics Department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity On You Tube

Newton's - Kepler's Ultimatum to Alfred Nobel Prize winner Physicists Stupidity
There are no physicists after us only "University" Idiots like you

Space time Relativistic Quantum and Strings mechanics is not physics
Real time Universal Mechanics
Newton's - Kepler's equations solved wrong for 350 years
1001 new real time physics formulas
Changing physics and the History of physics
Annexing quantum strings and all other mechanics to classical mechanics and deleting relativity
It is the math formulas that matches a physics experiment results
Newton's - Kepler's equations solved wrong for 350 years
Real time Newton's - Kepler's mechanics
Professor Joe Nahhas July 4th 1973
joenahhas1958@yahoo.com
Read my Lips: Joe Nahhas will end Alfred Nobel Mafia of Physics and physicists stupidity.
There is one and only one Mechanics
Real time universal mechanics
Real time mechanics is the natural law of past present and future of mechanics.
For 400 years Newton's - Kepler's were formulated and solved wrong.
The new real time solution of Newton's Kepler's equations deletes modern physics which is
based on relativistic quantum string time travel mechanics and matches experiments
with unprecedented accuracy to change physics and the history of physics in its entirety.
Modern Physics is based on relativistic quantum string time travel mechanics. Time is
caveman and modern man scale of convenience and is not Alfred Nobel dimension for time
travel regardless of what all Alfred Nobel time travel "Physicists" have to say about it. Time
travel is not physics and accepting time travel as physics in classrooms and using it in
scientific calculations by Physicists changed physics to stupidity and scientists to at least
palm readers and stupidity can only lead to more stupidity and more stupidity in fraud.
This is the proof of 110 years of Alfred Nobel Prize winner Physicists stupidity and fraud. I am
not saying that Alfred Nobel physics is stupid or fraud; I can prove it stupid and fraud and
this document is Modern Physics death certificate
For 350 years Newton and all others miss formulated 400 years old Kepler's
mechanics observations and Laws wrong and gave equations that have been solved
wrong for 350 years and introduced Alternative physics based proofs made for
looting money because after over a century of time traveling physics and physicists
the only proof of time travel is that physicists have no proof of time travel and the
collective value of Modern Physics is the value of 110 years of Nobel prize winner
physics of stupidity because Modern Physics is stupidity itself. The correct and new
formulation and solution of Newton's - Kepler's equations exposed 400 years of
wrong physics and physicists and exposed 110 years of Nobel prize winner modern
relativistic quantum and strings mechanics as stupidity itself. The new solutions of
Newton's - Kepler's equations erases 400 years of physics and re-write physics and
the history of physics in its entirety; annexes quantum mechanics to classical
Newton's - Kepler's equations mechanics and deletes relativity theory in its entirety.
The name is Joe Nahhas and I am handing Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists their
physics back.
Real time Universal Mechanics annexing all mechanics to classical mechanics and
deleting relativity.
All there is in the universe is objects of mass m at a location r = r (x, y, z) = (length,
width, height). The state of any object in the Universe is
S = m r (x, y, z)
State = mass x location; this is real time mechanical law of the Universe
What is wrong in all of physics is taking time dependent measurements wrong
Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.
We can only see and measure something that had happened. What we
measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event
that happened in past time. That is we measure past events in present
time
Present time = present time
Present time = past time + [present time - past time]
Present time = past time + relativistic time delays
Real time = event time + real time relativistic delays
Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays
physics
What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event +
relativistic delays
What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time
relativistic effects.
Observer time = traveller time + time delays
Real time = absolute time + time delays
Real time = Event time + time delays
Quantum = classical + relativity
Quantum - classical = relativity
Real time classical - classical = classical time delays
One and only one mechanics
Stupidity is Modern physics and stupid is modern physicists. I can say that
because I can prove that and it is not just one stupid physicist but 400,000 strong
stupid physicists and for all past 400 long years and 1001 "Universities" and
research centers and it is not just one proof but it is a full line of 1001 iron clad
proofs of Modern physicists stupidity and at the top is 110 years of Alfred Nobel
Prize winner physicists Space - to imaginary time - back to space jumping
continuum stupidity. Any thing that does not fit in three dimensional space (x, y, z)
= (length, width, height) is not physics and Space - to time - back to space four
dimensional jumping continuum (x, y, z, ỉ t) = (length, width, height, imaginary
time) or ten dimensional string theories is not physics and building physics on space
- to time - back to space Imaginary jumping continuum is stupidity itself because it
is not real and it odes not exist and without a proof and it is not related to anything
that can describe nature because Nature have not shown that it is made out a more
than three dimensions and this road physicists chosen is not only the wrong road
but it had led to the downfall of physics from science to stupidity and all modern
physics roads has one end and is a dead end and a dead end is the stupidity of
space- to imaginary time - back to space Alfred Nobel prize winner physics of
stupidity . I can prove that space - to imaginary time - back to space is stupidity
itself and I can prove that Modern physics space - t0 Imaginary time - back to space
Jumping continuum is not physics and the sign of a moron halo above physicists
head and the logo of Physicists stupidity. The purpose of this book is not just
present new ideas but to bring down the house with new ideas and the new idea is
bringing back physics and send Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics back to sender
with Kepler's regards Newton's signature and my two middle fingers!
Did you know that all of humanity is yet to learn how to use a telescope or a microscope or any equipment
that uses a signal to take a correct time dependent measurement in all of sciences?
Let me give an example of the 400,000 Physicists of space - to imaginary time - back to space
jumping stupidity and how time dependent measurement were taken wrong and led to modern
"University" professors stupidity and how the 400 years old mistake were used for the first
experimental proof of space-time relativistic quantum mechanics stupidity of physics and
physicists, or, Albert Einstein's - space-time - quantum relativistic stupidity physics that is taught
in classrooms and used in scientific calculations as the basis of Modern physics of stupidity.
Physicists and Astrophysicists and all others are yet to learn
how to use a telescope
If you drive a bicycle in a circle then your angular speed is:
The angular speed is θ' = orbital velocity/ radius = v/r
Physicists and Astrophysicists measure the motion of planets around the Sun or they measure
orbital speed v and they measure the average radial distance r to measure the angular speed.
They can not measure planets motion angular speed around the Sun directly.
In day time there is Sun and they can not see planets
At night time there is no Sun and they can see the planets
So, astronomers measure planets motion around the moving sun through an imaginary
Astronomical sphere attached to moving Earth and fixed stars and Earth- Sun motion is
known then they transfer the planets motion around the Sun data to the Sun from the data
collected on Earth and everything would be relative to the sun and we can know the data
relative to the Sun like in this table from Earth data transfer to the sun.
Planet Distance r Planet Orbit speed Less Spin Angular

X 106km Orbit T v in km/sec Earth speed velocity; v/r
speed km/sec arc sec/ century
Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29
Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86
Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1
Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411
Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6
Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87
Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59
Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68
Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74
The angular speed is θ' = v/r

For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec
If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then
And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century
If it is measured for planet Mercury then
W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88)
W"= 70.29 arc second per century
Astronomers and physicists in 1859 found that there are more of 43 arc sec per century.
How did that happen?
Time travel!
Or 150,000 living stupid idiots physicists with PhD's and Nobel Prizes spending their life times
bullying about time travel and "Crown Jewels" of quantum mechanics and looting billions in
funds and garbage for science for a data transfer with a toddler arithmetic failure when data
was transferred from Earth to Sun a time delay happened with data was transferred because
data transfer from Earth to Sun means motion and everything else has to move with it and in
this case Mercury data transfer from Earth to Sun should add an angular velocity of Mercury's
velocity divided by the distance the data were transferred. It is a time delay correction and not
space - time travel.
The time delay is:
W" = (v/R) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T); R = Earth - Sun Distance

For Mercury
W" = (47.9/149,600,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century
I have had known about this for almost four decades. As a starter; let me show you
how to outsmart Nobel Prize winner scientists one of them or all at one time . I
found Alfred Nobel physicists silly to say the least in summer of 1972. In 1969 I was
12 in 5th grade going to 6th grade and I studied the circle in that year. In kinder
garden and elementary school early years young kids are taught to waste time color
and scribble and I attempted to draw and my drawings of human faces and nature
came out as pieces of geometrical figures like a face came out with a triangular jaw
and circular eyes and oval lips and I realized that I would be better if my drawings
were geometrical figures. From third grade and to 5th grade I had a set of rulers
and a compass and knew how to draw a circle and concentric circles. When I studied
circles I learned about angular speed by dividing the circumference π x d by time
traveled or v = π d /t and not the diameter by time traveled d/t. One of the things
my teacher mentioned was the angle traveled (θ) per time (t) or the angular speed
θ/t = v/r; r = radius.
I practiced these formulas that summer of 1969 Hippie days and Wood stocks and
music and a man on the moon. In summer of 1969 I drew three concentric circles:
One with radius r (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet Mercury
Two with radius r (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet Venus
Three with radius r (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth
And assigned three speeds dreaming of space travel watching the space race
One with speed v (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet Mercury
Two with speed v (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet Venus
Three with speed v (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth
Then I made the division and got the angular speeds

Or velocity/radius θ/t = v/r; with units of radians/second
One angular speed v (m)/r (m) for bicycle one or first planet Mercury
Two angular speed v (v)/ r (v) for bicycle two or second planet Venus
Three angular speed v (e)/ r (e) for bicycle three or third planet Earth
What is the angular velocity of mercury around the sun?

It is v (m)/ r (m)
The question is how the angular speed of Mercury around the sun was measured?
Answer: It was measured from the moving Earth because I do not believe that there
are people on the Sun?
How did astronomers measure the angular speed of planet Mercury and planet
Venus around the Sun?
A - At day time Astronomers can not measure planet Mercury's speed because they
can not see the planets in day time.
B- At night time Astronomers can not see the Sun but they can see Mercury and
Venus.
C- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were not measured directly
They were deduced.
D- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were measured directly from
the Astronomical Sphere with respect to fixed stars from moving earth.
Earth motion was taken into consideration when measuring either planet angular
speed with respect to fixed stars and Planets motion was taken into consideration
with respect to fixed stars. What was not taken into consideration is Earth - Planets
visual effect or light aberrations effects because Earth planets motion was deduced
from the celestial sphere calculations and that visual effects is Earth motion speeds
orbital and rotational divided by their deduced distances from the sun or [v* (e)
(orbit) +/- v°(e) spin]/r (planet)
Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were deduced wrong for
350 years because it did not include Earth - planet light visual effects when
their motion was deduced from celestial sphere calculations.
This mistake is due to French mathematician Le Verrier in his calculations of

Mercury's orbit and his claim that Newtonian mechanics can not explain Mercury's
angular velocity or Venus angular velocity
The mistake for Planet Mercury is v (e)/r (m) = Earth velocity/Mercury's distance
When v (m)/r (m) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (m) added to it
And when measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ T (m) r (m) added to it
Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m); T (Mercury) = 88days
In degrees
W ° = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/π)
In minutes
W '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/π) (60)
In seconds
W" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/π) (60) (60)
= 43.0 "per century.
With v (e) {Erath speed - Earth spin speed} = [28.9 km/sec - 0.0465 km/sec] and r
(m) 58.2 x 10 9 m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun.
W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (m)] [36528/T (m)] (180/π) (3600) = 43.0"/century
For planet Mercury
The mistake is for Planet Venus is v (e)/r (v); or, light aberration
When v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (v)
T (v) = 224.7, v (e) = [28.9 km/sec - 0.0465 km/sec]; r (v) = 58.2 x 10 9 m
W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/π) (3600) = 9.0"/century
For Planet Venus
The concentric games I played in 5th grade drawings and multiplying and dividing
numbers gave me a hint and an idea in summer of 1972 when I read about
planetary motion around the sun from a book about astronomers named Copernicus
Galileo Kepler's and Newton
These numbers 43.0"/centuy and 9.0"/century are used as the First of the experimental
proofs of Modern physics and they were the first proof of Einstein's general relativity
theory.
Math page I
Abstarct: Le Verrier mistake
Actual value is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r

Used value: θ' = v/r = v (m)/r
Missing Value θ' = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
The Mistake is θ'(e) = [v* (e) +/- v° (e)]/r (180/π) (3600) (36526/T)
And v* (e) = Earth orbital velocity = 29.8 km/sec
And v° (e) = Earth rotational velocity = 0.465
And v* - v ° = 29.335km/sec
With Areal r²θ' = h = r v; θ' = v/r Kepler's law
Or Angular Velocity θ' = v/r from my 5th grade book Arithmetic book
The 400 years Mistake is measurements of θ' = v/r
If we are measuring this angular velocity from Earth for Mars then:
Astronomers use:
This, θ' = v/r = v (m)/r = velocity of Mercury / Distance of Mercury from the Sun
But the Actual value is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
The Missing Value θ'(e) = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r is the mistake
And θ'(e) = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r radians/second
For Mercury
And v* - v ° = 29.335km/sec
And r (Mercury) = (58.2 x 106 km)
And r = Mercury's (planet) mean distance
And θ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km) radians/second
= [(29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km)] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/88)] arc sec /century
= 43.1" arc-sec/100 years
For Venus: θ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)
= [(29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/224.7)]
Or W" = (29.8 - 0.065/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century
This mistake of 43 seconds of an arc in measuring the orbital speed of planet

mercury is taken as planet Mercury plays hide and seek disappearing in time and
coming later somewhere else!
Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space - time as a visual Illusion
at 14 made me realize that not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics and
physicists are wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.
But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972
Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered another

one that gave me the same results
Math page II
But the Actual value is θ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v (M) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] + v (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a]
= √ [G (m + M)/ a]
And θ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r
= √ [G (m + M)/ a³] Radians per seconds
In degree per century
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Advance of Perihelion
Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solution

With m = 0.23 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 m
And M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 88 days
With θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/century
Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
= 43.0 arc sec per century
Venus Advance of perihelion motion solution
And M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 224.7 days
Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
These damn Arithmetic mistakes are the stupid things called experimental proofs of
modern space - to imaginary time - back to space claims of modern physics coming
out of the "magic sock" of University Professors physics. The 43 seconds of an arc
per century is presented by "University" physicists proudly as the first experimental
proof of time travel taught by Nobel Prize winners to their PHD's students in four
years! All of Modern Physics experimental proofs are rigging like this!
This data transfer problem has a formula
The mistake is
Real time = Event time

Then make - believe relativity theory came to explain the time delays puzzles
through making up stuff like space - to imaginary time - back to space Hollywood
studios make - believe time travel physics.
Quantum mechanics came to explain the visual illusion seen in the lab one time you
find things in event time and one time you find things in real time and you dig your
face again? What?
Time t is a human made scale for our convenience and comfort in understanding
events and time is not a dimension like space (x, y, z) = (length, width, height) to
allow space - to time - back to space jumping continuum (x, y, z, ỉ t) = (length,
width. height, imaginary time) used and taught by physicists regardless of what all
the 150,000 Modern living physicists have to say about it and regardless of what the
dead 250,000 physicists had to say about it because physicists have no proof of
space - time continuum (x, y, z, ỉ t) physics; I care the less what Nobel Prize
winners or anyone had to say about it either because we can travel in space and
unless physicists have a time travel bus with Einstein driving they can keep the
trash to themselves. The only proof of space - to imaginary time - back to space
continuum is that Physicists have no proof of space - to imaginary time - back to
space continuum. What physicists claim as space - time travel continuum or the
process of jumping from space - to imaginary time - back to space continuum (x, y,
z, ỉ t) experimental proofs are nothing and add up to a smoke of nothing. Space
-time is nothing more than absolute garbage and a signature of "University"
Professors fraud and stupidity. Building modern physics on space-time made physics
a stupidity taught in classrooms and made scientific calculations as good as gypsy
fortune telling and all the Nobel Prizes that was won based on space time physics I
can prove it as wrong physics and wrong physics is space -time confusion of physics
because it is all a made out visual illusions and nothing more than PHD idiots and
Nobel PHD Idiots taking time dependent measurements wrong for 350 years and
bullying humanity for funds. Space - Time continuum is not physics because I can
prove it as visual illusion and a visual illusion only. It is time for change; regime
change. It is not just Einstein Feynman and all other 110 years of Nobel prize
winners bullying physicists are wrong but what I am writing is that all physicist are
wrong for past 350 years and I dare all to prove me wrong. My name is Joe Nahhas
and I am the greatest physicist of all time and here it is your chance to look and
your chance to have a say and if you can prove me wrong then I will delete it and
go work at Macdonald's but for now I can say without hesitation that sending the
150,000 living Modern space time Physicists to work at Macdonald's has no negative
effect on the subject of Physics and on the contrary it would have a much positive
effect and nothing has better positive effect than taking stupidity out of classrooms
and out of scientific calculations. Here it is and remember Macdonald's is hiring:
time
physics
What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event +
relativistic delays
What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time
relativistic effects.
Quantum = Newton + relativity
Γ = t + (Γ - t)
Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)
Γ = t (Γ/t)
ỉωt ỉωt
Γ=te ; Γ/t = e ; ω t = arc tan (v/c)
Γ = t [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
Γ = Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t cosine ω t + ỉ t sine ω t
Γ (x) = t cosine ω t = t {1 - 2 sine² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}
Δ Γ (x) = Γ (x) - t = - 2 t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]
Δ Γ (x) = - 2 t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]
Γ (y) = sine ω t = sine arc tan (v/c)
This is time delays and this formula

Erases Einstein's relativity stupidity and Feynman quantum mechanics

stupidity in its entirety and all of relativity and quantum mechanics based
theories
This following High school math formula
Is the greatest one mistake physicists make every day and it is the one
formula that has to be accounted for in every day physics work and in
every time, time dependent measurements are made and every time
signals and not measuring tape is used as means of measurements. This
one mistake is the mother of all mistakes in human history of science and
it is as old as physics itself. This one mistake not new and it goes back to
the start of science because light had been studied for all of past
centuries and this one mistake is a rule of nature and a mistake that
never been accounted for and outlasted all physicists of past centuries
and it is one that nature has and was missed and in the process creepy
physics called Modern physics called relativistic quantum mechanics and
all physics that was based on relativistic quantum mechanics and was
made to explain the consequences of this one mistake when this one
mistake is a beautiful and a simple rule of nature.
For example, this equation explains the first experimental proof of space -
time travel and the first experimental of experimental proof general
relativity theory dearest to Einstein applied to planet mercury.

Where t = 100 years = 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 seconds
And using the 1/2 cycle measurements
Δ Γ (x) /2 = - t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] seconds

And v = v (m) [Mercury] - v (e) [Earth]
= 47.9 km/sec - 29.8 km/sec = 18.1 km/sec
Or W" = (15/2) Δ Γ (x) = (7.5) t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] arc seconds
W" = 7.5 x 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 x sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (18.1/300,000)]
= 43.0" arc seconds per 100 years
Another example: this equation explains the much bragged about 1/5
amplitude of Richard Feynman experimental proof of space - to imaginary
time - back to space stupidity travel and the experimental proof of his
"crown jewel"
This following High school math formula

With n = v/c = 1/1.33 = 3/4
Δ Γ (x) = 1/5
Visual Illusions deception are common in modern physics because

modern physics study light and light spectrum and the entire spectrum or
matter that has mass m and a location r. When light is used as signals to
measure motion of traveling objects motion and mass from within a
traveling lab everything that is measured will include time delays and will
makes visual effects modern physicists present as a made up real
universe. Visual effects are very deceptive but not for lucid physics and
physicists and to know that most of Modern Physics is made out of visual
Illusion make is problematic and telling it make people walk away to say
the least not only because they would be skeptical but it is frightening to
them spending their entire life on playing science in the dark and
suddenly there was light and in clear visions and all there is and was is
Nobel stupidity. Such shocks I gave during long years to PHD physicists
and "university" professors and researchers made me the one and lonely
greatest physicist of all time and both fingers raised. The thing about
modern physics it I can prove that most of modern physics is made out of
visual deceptions and Modern physics and physicists of relativity and
quantum mechanics came out as an attempt to explain these visual
deceptions and most of quantum relativistic physics and all sciences
based on quantum relativistic are mostly a make up world of science.
Taking visual effects as real and calling it modern physics and give it
Nobel prizes does not make it real physics. For almost forty years of my
nightmare not because I can not prove that modern Physics is mostly
made out of visual deceptions but it is because I can prove it a visual
deception and every time I proved that Modern Physics is made out of
visual deceptions I give people shocks they did not want or wanted to
believe that they spent their entire professional life with a moron halo
above their heads.
I can prove that most of modern physics lab work is made out of visual
illusion and I am writing this book to change modern physics and the
stupid history of modern Physics. Wrong arithmetic and fortune hunters
who pushed wrong arithmetic led to modern physics that people call
science and that made science a fiction and this one formula uncovers
110 years of Nobel prize winners wrong arithmetic stupidity and fraud
from Einstein (relativity) to Feynman (quantum) to Pauli elementary
particles (μ - Mesons) to Reines dark energy (neutrino) to space motion
(binary stars) to Global positioning systems (GPS) or to state of the art
femto - physics stupidity with Femto chemistry Zewail. 110 years of
Nobel Prize winners Physicists physics stupidity in its entirety can be
uncovered with this single formula. Furthermore, this formula uncovers
350 years of mistakes to re-write physics and the history of physics. This
time delay equation led to the grand mistake called Modern Physics, or,
relativistic quantum mechanics space-time physics.
Δ Γ (x) = - 2 sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}

It was missed by all physicists from centuries old physics new physicists alike.
Modern physicists made this mistake one way or another starting with Newton's
himself. Its origin is when measurements are taken of moving objects.
Kepler's Areal speed laws told us about this mistake
Or, r (1) θ'² (1) = r (2) θ'²(2) = location x speed = constant

= Areal velocity
Or, θ' (1) = {√[r (2)/ r (1)]} θ' (2)
And θ' (1) - θ' (2) = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} θ' (2)
Δ θ' = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} θ' (2)
This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion
The angular speed is θ' = v/r

For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec
If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then
And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century
If it is measured for planet Mercury then
W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88)
W"= 70.29 arc second per century
Or, Δ W" = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)
What is the angular visual Illusion that would be seen when measured
from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106
And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

And W" (2) = 70.29 arc sec /century
Δ W" = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

Δ W" = {{√ [58.2/ 149.6]} - 1} 70.29 = 43.0" arc per century
Planet Distance r Planet Orbit speed Less Spin Angular
X 106km Orbit T v in km/sec Earth speed velocity; v/r
speed km/sec arc sec/ century
Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29
Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86
Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1
Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411
Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6
Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87
Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59
Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68
Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74
We went to the Lab and measured the force between two balls and the
force measurements was fit into an equation that came out as
Newton's Gravitational law told us about this mistake
Newton changed Kepler's law correctly from:
T²/a³ = 4 π²/GM
To T²/a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)
That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data are centered
at the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this:
T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and
T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)
When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as shown:
The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton
T (1) = T (2) √ [M/ (M + m)]
And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M)
And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M)
And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)]
This approximation was not on the original work
And θ' (2) - θ' (1) = θ' (1) [1 /√ [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) ≈ - θ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 π/T] [m/2M) = - π m/MT radians/T
W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days
With m = 0.32 x1024 kg

And M = 2.0 x1030 kg
T = 88 days
W' (calculated) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years
There are many more ways to get to prove that the 43 seconds of an arc of Planet Mercury
axis tilt in 100 years is just an arithmetic mistake
One of the ways that can be used to explain it is making up stuff like Einstein did and that is
making up stuff. For example making up another gravitational force
Einstein added k/ r4 to Newton's - Kepler's Gravitational force laws F = - GmM/r²

Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r²
Became Einstein's Gravitational law to explain the 43 arc sec per century
Or, F = - GmM/r² + k/ r4; Einstein law
Einstein has no proof of the existence of this extra force + k/ r4

He used and dwelled on the arithmetic mistake to claim that this is due to time travel
This make - up physics or rigging made by Einstein is fraud
Let us make - up a force and prove the same thing Einstein proved!
How about a force of inverse cube law - k/r³
Let us use this make - up and beat Alfred Nobel Physicists
Location r = r r (1)
Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
And
S = m r; State = mass x distance
P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r

Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)
P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in mass
F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

= m d² r/d t² + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
F = m d² r/d t² + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
Force = Change of momentum
F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
F = - GmM/r²
Then
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)
With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
Abstract:
Inverse Cube equations F = m γ = - k/r³ r (1), then in polar coordinates
With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - k /r³ Inverse Cube made - up Gravitational law (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)
These two equations give an axial rotation rate:
One: φ = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

= 43.0344 seconds of arc / century for Mercury
Two: δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100 years
= 43.0" seconds of arc /century for Mercury
Solution:
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
In polar coordinates system
r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r (1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-GmM/r²] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = - k/ r³; Inverse Cube Gravitational Equation (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's law (2)
With m = constant
Then d² r/dt² - θ'²r = - k/ r³ (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 (2)
From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h

From (1), θ'² d² r/ dθ² - θ'²r = - k/ mr³
And θ'² [d² r/ dθ² - r] = - k/ mr³

And d² r/ dθ² - r = - (k/mh²) r
And d² r/ dθ² - r [1 - (k/mh²)] = 0
And r (θ, 0) = r (0, 0) Exp ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ
From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h
Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ'' = 0

Dividing by r²θ'
We get 2 (r'/r) + (θ''/θ') = 0

And 2 (r'/r) = - θ''/θ' = 2ỉ ω t
And r = r (0, 0) Exp ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ Exp ỉ ω t
And θ' = θ' (θ, 0) Exp - 2ỉ ω t
Or r = r (0, 0) Exp ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]
And θ' = θ' (0, 0) Exp -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]
And θ' = θ' (0, 0) Exp -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/h²)]} θ + ω t]

And θ' = (θ' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/h²)]} θ + ω t] - ỉ sine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/h²)]} θ + ω t]}
And θ' - θ' (0, 0) = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

And δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]
If k = Gm M α; h = 2π a b/T
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 - (GMαT²/4π²a²b²)]} θ + ω t]
Taking Kepler's: T²/4π²a³ = 1/GM = 1/G M

And GM = 4π²a³/ T²; GM α T² = 4π²a³ α
And (GMαT²/4π²a²b²) = a α/b²
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ (1 - a α/b²)} θ + ω t]
If α = mb²/aM
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 - (m/ M)]} θ + ω t]
If θ = 0
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t
And θ' (0, 0) = h/r² = 2πab/Ta² (1 - ε) ²
= 2πa²√ (1 - ε²)/Ta² (1 - ε) ² = 2π√ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ²
And δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t
With ω T = arc tan v/c << 1

Then δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² sine² arc tan (v/c) radians per T
Or δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² radians per T
And δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years
Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1.552) (48.2/c) ² = 43.11 " arc second/100 years
Or If ω = 0
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² {√ [1 - (m/ M)]} θ
And (m/ M) << 1
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² θ
If θ = arc tan (v/c)
Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² arc tan (v/c)
With θ' (0, 0) = 2π√ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ²

Then δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100 years
Or r = r (0, 0) Exp ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

Or r = r (0, 0) Exp ỉ [{√ [1 - (m/M)]} θ + ω t]
If m/ M << 1
Then r ≈ r (0, 0) Exp ỉ [{[1 - (m/ 2M)]} θ + ω t]
And r ≈ r (0, 0) Exp ỉ [(θ - φ) + ω t]
With φ = m/ 2M θ
Taking θ = 2π
Then φ = π m/ M radians
And φ = π m/ (M) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years
Or φ = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

= 43.0344"/100 years
Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

= 43.0"/100 years
Or and extra Newton's φ = π m/ (m+ M) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years
Either one of the three formulas works and gives 43 seconds of an arc for planet Mercury.
Let me make another make - up force and let us make it nuclear force
Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r²) Exp (m α/M r): One stone two birds
Vs Newton's Gravity (-GmM/r²) And Vs Einstein's Gravity (-GmM/r²) + k/ (r²)²
Abstract: Nahhas' force (-GmM/r²)Exp(m α/M r) or the nuclear gravity force is the crudely
approximated Newtonian gravity force (-GmM/r²) explains planetary motion around the sun
as a rotating ellipse with a rotation rate φ = [π m/(m + M)](180/π)(36526/T)(3600) = 43.03
seconds of an arc per century for the most talked about planet of mercury; m = 3.2 x 10^24
kg; M = 2x10^30 kg; T = 88days
For 400 years and a million Physicists Astrophysicists Mathematicians Engineers and all
others solved the Newton's-Kepler's Equations wrong
With d² (m r)/dt² – (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravity Force (1)

And d (Wim²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)
With a solution: r = [a (1 – ε²)/(1 + ε cosine θ)] Newton's Equation solution
And θ' = h/r² Kepler's Equation Solution
The correct solution:
Nahhas' solution: r(θ, t) = [a(1 – ε²)/(1 + ε cosine θ)] Exp [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
And rotation rate of
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effect
In general v* = v* (p) + v*(s) and v° = v° (p) + v° (s); p = primary; s= secondary
And v* + v° = 48.2 km/sec; ε = 0.206; T = 88 days; c = 300,000 km/sec
W° (ob) = 43.11''/century; W° (observed) = 43.11''
The new correct solution contains Newton's-Kepler's particle mechanics and Quantum wave
mechanics in one equation and Einstein's relativity deleted.
However; planetary motion and its most talked about planet orbit of mercury's rotating
ellipse and its rate of advance of perihelion can be explained as a nuclear gravitation force
and not as a Newton's gravitational force or Einstein's space-time confusion of force or any
other force and this new gravitation equation is:
With d² (m r)/dt² – (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²]Exp(m α/ M r) Nuclear gravity Equation (1)
And (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)
Solution:


r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
Proof:
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)



γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)
(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h

And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = -GmM/r²
Let m r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²]
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Nuclear Gravity (1)

-hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = -GMu² [1 – (α m/M) u]; α m/M r << 1

Or (d²u/ dθ²) + (1 – Gmα/h²) u = GM/h²
And u = [GM/ h²]/ [1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]} θ
And r = 1/u = 1/ {[GM/ h²]/ [1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ}

= [1 – Gmα/h²]/M/ h²]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]} θ
Where [1 – Gmα/h²]/GM/h² = a (1 – ε²)
And [1 – Gmα/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²)
If α = a (1 – ε²), the h² = G (m + M) a (1- ε²)

Then Gmα/h² = G m a (1 - ε²) /G (m + M) a (1- ε²)
= m (m + M)
With r (θ, 0) = [1 – Gmα/h²]/M/ h²]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ
Then r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ
And r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – m/ (m + M)]} θ
And m << M; √ [1 – m/ (m + M)] ≈ 1 - m/2(m + M)
With {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ ≈ [1 - m/ 2(m + M)] θ

If θ = 2π, Then 2π [1- m/2(m + M)] = 2π - 2π [m/2(m + M)]
With r(θ,0) = a(1 – ε²)/{1 + ε cosine [θ – mθ/2(m + M)]}

Then r(θ,0) = a(1 – ε²)/[1 + ε cosine (θ – φ)]
And φ = mθ/2(m + M)
With θ = 2π, then φ = 2πm/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M) radians/second
Multiplication by 180/π, then φ = 180m/ (m + M) degrees/second

Multiplication by (36526/T), then φ = [m/ (m + M)] (180)(36526/T) degrees/century
Multiplication by 3600, then φ = [m/ (m + M)] (180)(36526/T)(3600) seconds/century
With Planet Mercury: m = 3.2x10^24kg; M = 2x10^30kg

Then φ = [3.2x10^24/2x10^30](180)(36526/T)(3600) seconds of an arc per century
And φ = 43.03426909''/century
Planet Mercury 43" seconds of arc per century elliptical orbit axial rotation rate
Einstein has a similar equation
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² + k/ (r²)² Einstein's Space-time (1)

With r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/[1 + ε cosine (θ – φ)]

And φ = [6πGM/ac² (1 – ε²)] radians/second x (180/π) (36526/T)(3600)=43.03''
Newton's force -GmM/r² if corrected to [– GmM/r²] Exp (m α/M r) gives exact solution
without make-believe 20th century confusion of physics unless you have been to time travel
buss station of a 1956 live Elvis show! Then I will bow
Then φ (Venus) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Venus)] = 8.426826168''
And φ (Earth) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Earth)] = 5.184''
The advance of perihelion of Venus and Earth never been measured but badly approximated
and deduced and the reason for that is the very small value and Venus looks like a star and
not a planet. For centuries Astronomers are yet to have reliable data of Venus like its rotation
velocity. In recent years astronomers gave 6.5 km/sec for its rotational speed from its light
spectrum; however, V= 2πr/p; r = Venus radius and p = Venus rotational period comes to few
meters per seconds and not few kilometers per second indicating 400 years of astronomy that
claims to know how the Universe was born and how it will end when the have no clue the
speed of a planet that can been seen 24/7 from satellites.
Einstein equation is
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² + k/ (r²)² Einstein's Space-time (1)

With r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ – φ)]
And φ = [6πGM/ac² (1 – ε²)] radians/second x (180/π) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''
There is nothing unique about it

It is a made up physics
It works on plant Mercury
It does not work anywhere else

In 1959 there was an article in science magazine that said if Relativity is to be tested
properly then it should be applied to binary stars or two stars systems.
Relativity theory failed the test with two star systems and this equation failed and it
failed it very bad and yes this formula:
Or, φ = [6πGM/ac² (1 – ε²)] radians/second x (180/π) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''
Does not work anywhere else
Why Nobel Prize winners insist on teaching this formula and teaching relativity theory when
Einstein's relativity theory is proven wrong is a signature of the scientific character:
Nobel Prize winner physicists are representative of the big institutions Mafia and a Nobel
prize winner physicist will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money
prestige and a cut in the hundreds of millions of dollars the institution that backed him up and
received massive funding for their research boats dogs and mistresses.
We went to the Lab and
In the Lab the force between two balls was measured: F = -GmM/r²
And Newton F = m γ
And got this equation
Then

Then he solved his equation like this
And

F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
F = - GmM/r²
Then

The solution is as follows
From 2: With m = constant; then d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

And m² d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And r²θ' = h
With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r²

With m = constant
Then m [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - Gm M/ r²
And [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - G M/ r²
Let r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r /d t² = - h θ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²]
And - h u² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu²
Or, [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h ²

u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ
And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h² + A cosine θ]
= (h²/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah²/ GM) cosine θ]
= (h²/GM)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)
Then r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)
This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this equation
and we got the motion equation: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] Which is the equation of
an ellipse with eccentricity ε and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis b = a √ [1 - ε²]
and two foci one equals to c = ε a, and the other foci location equals to - c = - ε a. Or the
motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with the other ball at one of the
foci +/- ε a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a) on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b)
on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again with angle of rotation θ. If this law to work on two
planets instead of two balls like planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should
see this motion of a planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.
When astronomers turned their telescopes to confirm the force law F = -GmM/r² and see if
planetary motion around the Sun abide by this law and attempt to see a planet moves in an
ellipse around the sun with the sun at one of the foci of that ellipse, they saw an ellipse with
rotating axes instead.
Solution of -GmM/r²: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] they did not see this
But instead they saw this

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
That is they saw r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r)
This is the equation of an ellipse with rotating axes.
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
The difference is Γ/t = ℮ (r)
And λ (r) = 0
Are Newton's - Kepler's laws wrong?
Einstein and 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physicists said Hell Ya they are wrong
Relativity theory in its entirety said Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong
Quantum mechanics Physicists had been saying Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong
Modern Physics is based on Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

100,000 PHD living physicists said Newton's laws are wrong
100,000 PHD dead physicists said Newton's laws are wrong
100,000 PHD Physicists web pages said Newton's laws are wrong
Modern physicists brag about the assumption that Newton's equations were wrong and that
relativity theory and quantum mechanics and other theories are needed to explain new
experimental results
Now who is wrong the experimenter in the Lab who measured F = -GmM/r²
Or, Einstein is wrong?

And Einstein added k/r4
And made F = -GmM/r² + k/r4
And made new equations and deleted Newton's equation
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² + k/r4; Einstein's Gravitational Equation (1)

And the New solution became: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [(1+ ε cosine (θ - w)]
Where w" = [6πGM/ Ta (1- ε²)] (180/π) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century
G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 m
M = 2 x 1030 kg
And T = 88 days for planet Mercury to give
Where w" = [6πGM/ Ta (1- ε²)] (180/π) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century
= 43.0" arc sec/century
And this was experimentally correct?

The world sided with Einstein because the theory fits with the experiment
When Einstein formulas were used on binary stars motion it failed!

Binary stars is a two stars system and should behave like a planet and a sun or one star
moving around the other star in the same manner a planet moves around the Sun
Why Physicists and Astrophysicists insist on Einstein's formula when there is dozens of
documented cases where Einstein's formulas fail?
Scientists added rotational distortions term to rescue relativity theory and quantum
mechanics because both are based on space time stupidity beside + k/r4 term to come closer
to experimental results and for every hit it missed a thousand times. It is not only Einstein
is wrong but all physicists and astrophysicists are yet to know how to use a
telescope!
There is nothing wrong with the experimenter in the Lab or F = -GmM/r²

And there is nothing wrong with Newton's - Kepler's equations
These equations are correct

What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

The old solution is an event time orbit solution
Or, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)]
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
The real time orbit solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r)
The difference between the two solutions is time delays visual effects that
explains planet Mercury's motion or any motion for that matter correctly
every time without space - time relativistic confusions or stupidity physics
"Apparent advance of perihelion is given by this formula"

Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of:
W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds/100 years
With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/sec

And v° = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/sec
And c = light velocity of 300,000 km/sec
And ε = 0.206
And √ (1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ² = 1.552
And v°+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/sec
Giving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0"
This formula
W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) ² arc seconds/100 years
= 43.0" arc sec /century
Said that Physicists are idiots and Astro physicists have no clue how to use
the telescope. Why? Because it works on every planetary system or
satellite system without any exception
For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved wrong.

For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved in event time
I have had known about this for almost four decades
Newton's Kepler's solution in real time

Real time two body problem
In Polar coordinates

(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
Then m²r²θ' = constant

= H (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] h (θ, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, t)] [r² (θ, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m²(θ, 0) m²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)r²(0,t)][θ'(θ, t)]
= [m²(θ, 0) m²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)r²(0,t)][θ'(θ, 0) θ' (0, t)]
With m²r²θ' = constant

Differentiate with respect to time
Then 2mm'r²θ' + 2m²rr'θ' + m²r²θ" = 0
Divide by m²r²θ'
Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[λ (m) + ì ω (m)]
And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]
And θ"/θ' = -2{λ (m) + λ (r) + ỉ [ω (m) + ω (r)]}
Then (m'/m) = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]

Or d m/m d t = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]
And dm/m = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] d t
Then m = m (0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t
m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t
With initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (θ, 0)
And m = m (θ, 0) m (0, t) = m (θ, 0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t; Exp = Exponential
And m (0, t) = Exp [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] t
Similarly we can get
Also, r = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ (r) + ì ω (r)] t
With r (0, t) = Exp [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then θ'(θ, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m²(θ,0) r(θ,0)]}Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ì [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}} -----I

And θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0)]} Exp {-2{[λ (m) + λ (r)] t + ì [ω (m) + ω (r)] t}} --------------------I
And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t)
And θ' (0, t) = Exp {-2{[λ (m) + λ(r)] t + ì [ω (m) + ω(r)] t}
Also θ'(θ, 0) = H (0, 0)/ m² (θ, 0) r² (θ, 0)
And θ'(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (0, 0) r (0, 0)]}
With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² = -Gm³M/m²r²

And d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) M/ (m²r²)
Let m r =1/u
Then d (m r)/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = -H d u/d θ
And d² (m r)/dt² = -Hθ'd²u/dθ² = - Hu² [d²u/dθ²]
-Hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (Hu²)² = -Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) Mu²

[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) M/ H²
t = 0; m³ (0, 0) = 1
u = Gm³ (θ, 0) M/ H² + A cosine θ =Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)/ h² (θ, 0)
And m r = 1/u = 1/ [Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)/ h (θ, 0) + A cosine θ]

= [h²/ Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ {1 + [Ah²/ Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)] [cosine θ]}
= [h²/Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ (1 + ε cosine θ)
Then m (θ, 0) r (θ, 0) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] m (θ, 0)

Dividing by m (θ, 0)
Then r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)
This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem which is the equation of
an ellipse of semi-major axis of length a and semi minor axis b = a √ (1 - ε²) and focus length
c=εa
And m r = m (θ, t) r (θ, t) = m (θ, 0) m (0, t) r (θ, 0) r (0, t)
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] {Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)] t} ---------------------------------- II
This is Newton's time dependent equation that is missed for 350 years
If λ (m) ≈ 0 fixed mass and λ(r) ≈ 0 fixed orbit; then
Then r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] Exp i ω (r) t
And m = m (θ, 0) Exp [i ω (m) t] = m (θ, 0) Exp ỉ ω (m) t
We Have θ'(0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r² (0, 0) = 2πab/ Ta² (1-ε) ²

= 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²
= 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
Then θ'(0, t) = {2π [√ (1-ε²)]/ T (1-ε) ²} Exp {-2[ω (m) + ω (r)] t

= {2π [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {cosine 2[ω (m) + ω (r)] t - ỉ sin 2[ω (m) + ω (r)] t}
And θ'(0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1- 2sin² [ω (m) + ω (r)] t}

- ỉ 2i θ'(0, 0) sin [ω (m) + ω (r)] t cosine [ω (m) + ω (r)] t
Then θ'(0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1 - 2sine² [ω (m) t + ω (r) t]}

- 2ỉ θ'(0, 0) sin [ω (m) + ω(r)] t cosine [ω (m) + ω(r)] t
Δ θ' (0, t) = Real Δ θ' (0, t) + Imaginary Δ θ (0, t)

Real Δ θ (0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1 - 2 sine² [ω (m) t ω(r) t]}
Let W (calculated) = Δ θ' (0, t) (observed) = Real Δ θ (0, t) - θ'(0, 0)

= -2θ'(0, 0) sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]
= -2[2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]
W (Cal) = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²]} sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]
If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v°/c = tan ω (m) T°; v*/c = tan ω (r) T*
Where T° = spin period; T* = orbital period
And ω (m) T° = Inverse tan v°/c; ω (r) T*= Inverse tan v*/c
W (ob) = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² [Inverse tan v°/c + Inverse tan v*/c] radians
Multiplication by 180/π
W (ob) = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v° v*/c²]} degrees
and multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v° v*/c²]} degrees/100 years
Approximations I
With v° << c and v* << c, then v° v* <<< c² and [1 - v° v*/c²] ≈ 1

Then W° (ob) ≈ (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c]
degrees/100 years
Approximations II
With v° << c and v* << c, then sine Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c] ≈ (v° + v*)/c
W° (Cal) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
In arc second per century
W" (Cal-arc sec) = (-720x36526x3600/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ²
In Time seconds
W" (Cal- sec) = (-720x36526x3600/15Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ²
Applied to Mercury's Perihelion
Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of:

With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/sec

And v° = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/sec
And c = light velocity of 300,000 km/sec
And ε = 0.206
And √ (1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ² = 1.552
And v°+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/sec
Giving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0"
This formula
W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) ² arc seconds/100 years
= 43.0" arc sec /century
Did Newton's need this solution to determine the advance of perihelion of Planet
mercury?

Hell NO: In his days the telescopes were very small and the advance of
perihelion was not an issue
At Perihelion: d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² = - r θ'²; d² r/d t² = 0
Then r θ'² = GM/r²
A quick answer by Newton would be
And First θ' ² = [GM/r³] Kepler's findings

Frames are related by the quotient of their velocities θ = arc tan (v m/ v n) and the
advance of perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or the quantity tan θ
= (v m/ v n) = [(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)] = Earth speed and spin/Mercury speed and spin
Advance of perihelion Period is given by:
Kepler's equation: ω² = [GM/r³] [(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]
In arc sec / century
Then ω = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]} 1/2 [(180/π) (3600) (36526/T) = 43"/century
G = gravitational constant
M = sun mass
r = Mercury - Sun distance
These equations are correct
What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

The old solution is an event time orbit solution
Or, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)]
Nahhas' Equations: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space - time as a visual Illusion
at 14 made me realize that not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics and
physicists are wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.
But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972
Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered another

one that gave me the same results
Math page II
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v (M) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
= √ [G (m + M)/ a]
And θ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)

Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
In summer of 1973 I decided to tackle relativity and relativity theory starts with
Michelson and Morley experiment.
One of the beautiful things I remember about old city of Beirut before the start of
the civil war in June 1973 and exploded in April 1975 is the abundance of
entertainment. Reading as a cheap entertainment was/is available to people of
Lebanon where I was born and on Sundays during summer time the old Martyr
square and surrounding areas side walks that changed to a flea market of used and
new books and open publishing houses beside restaurants and movie theatres.
There on the streets of old Beirut from 1968 - 1974 I walked through the greatest
library I knew. Scientists are made in JR High. College is an opportunity to become
one. On those summers I bought books and magazines in many subjects and in two
languages that I can read write and speak that is English and Arabic. I started with
Cartoon magazines then short stories then long stories then Lyrics of western music
to novels or crafts to philosophy or science and everything that was there and I can
afford and looked interesting. One of the books I bought was how to make a reel of
cartoon movies.
In summer of 1973 at age 15 I made a reel of the progress of light Points to see
how this space - time in the frame work of Michelson and Morley experiment work
and after few weeks and piles of drawings I realized the theory behind the
experiment is fraud and could never work. I realized that the theory is in stationary
time and what is measured is in real time proving my earlier finding which is if
someone to measure others motion like measuring planets motion around the sun
from earth and not from the sun then there will be errors from planets to earth and
these were not being accounted for.
Newton's equations should be wrong too because Newton did the same mistake
when he changed Kepler's laws.
In summer of 1974 I figured something else wrong and what was wrong with
Newton's changing Kepler's law.
Math Pages III: Newton Changed Kepler's law from T²/a³ = 4 π²/GM to T²/a³ = 4 π²/G
(M + m) and introducing an error like this T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M +
m)
When Newton changed Kepler's equation he created the advance of perihelion as shown:
The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton
T (1) = T (2) √ [M/ (M + m)]

And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M)
And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M)
And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)]
This approximation was not on the original work

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) = θ' (1) [1 /√ [1 + (m/M)] - 1]
And θ' (2) - θ' (1) ≈ - θ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 π/T] [m/2M) = - π m/MT radians/T
W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days
W' (observed) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years; by
Newton.
This was the 3rd formula that I found to explain the 43 seconds of an arc per century
for mercury beside Einstein's space - time
W" (observed) = 6πGM/Tac² (1 - ε²) = [6 π / T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ²; v =orbital velocity

W " (observed) = [6 π / T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 (century)
W " (observed) = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² arc sec/ 100 years Einstein
Newton and Einstein made the same mistake because their formula was rigged to cater for planet Mercury
using different reference time frames and introducing mistakes. First mistake was Newton's mistake
because using different frames of reference introduces time delay errors. When Newton changed frames of
reference he took mass m and implemented μ = m [M/ (M + m)] and we stuck with an error or shortage
factor in mathematical form amount to M/ (M + m). After Newton astronomers were puzzled by the
perihelion advance of planet Mercury not investigating its origin. The time delay error to changing frames
of reference is this formula for the angle at closet approach is:
Then I found another one

Math pages IV
This is how in 1973 at age 15 found space -time to be a joke.

First θ' ² = [GM/r³] Kepler's findings
Second: If θ' is seen as θ' + ω; ω = period of advance of perihelion:
Then, (θ' + ω) ² = [GM/r³]
When I read Michelson and Morley experiment I found it defective. They theory is in
one time frame and the experiment set up is in another time frame and the two time
frames are related by the quotient of their velocities θ = arc tan (v m/ v n) and the
advance of perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or the quantity tan θ
= (v m/ v n) = [(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]
Advance of perihelion Period is given by:
Kepler's Nahhas equation: ω² = [GM/r³] [(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]
In arc sec / century
Then ω = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]} 1/2 [(180/π) (3600) (36526/T)]
= 42.98 arc sec per century for mercury
Where v* = orbital speed of earth; v° = spin speed of earth
And v** = orbital speed of observed Planet and v°° = spin speed of observed Planet
And r = mean distance f planet from the sun
Is there any more?

Then ω = {[G (m + M)/r³]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v°)/ (v** +/- v°°)]} 1/2 [(180/π) (3600) (36526/T)]
Is there anymore?
Has to be
If space-time is visual effects then I should be able to find the values of
planet Mercury and Venus from a time perspective
Find the time dependent formula and change the value of time in seconds to an
angle in arc seconds by multiplying by 15.
In 1974 I got this

Math pages V
Abstract: Ending relativity from classrooms and scientific calculations starts

with ending Nobel Prize winner Physicists wrong physics and it starts with the
grand mistake called relativity theory. Relativity theory is based on the fact that
light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light
projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we
measure r cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence
instead of measuring time T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is
the experimental proof of it.
Your eyes
A000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 θ(2) 0 0 0
0 θ(1) 0 0 θ (3)0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0
1 2 3
The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1 and
2 and 3 is AB
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (1)
Then C (1) cosine θ (1) = C (2) cosine θ (2) = C (3) cosine θ (3) = c = AB
You want experimental proof?

Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the light
projections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion and stars to
solve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars better than all is
If an object at location A sends light signals in all directions at time at t = 0 where B1 is;
And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured. AB1 is theorized
and AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine θ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
B1B2 /AB1 = sine θ; AB2/AB1 = cosine θ; B1B2/AB2 = tan θ
Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time Γ = t cosine θ
A Light V E L O C I T Y B2
O O O O O O O O O O
O θ C O
O O
O O
O V O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
B1
Γ = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}}

Γ - t = 2 t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}
Astronomers use 1/2 cycle
Then (Γ - t)/2 = - t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v << c
Then (Γ - t)/2 = - (t /4) (v/c) ² seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycles
And (Γ - t)/2 = - 15 (t /4) (v/c) ² arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle
= 3.75 t (v/c) ² arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle
When we measure the orbit of planet Mercury we use v = velocity of mercury - velocity of
earth = 47.9 km - 29.8 km = 18.1 km; v = 300,000 km/sec
If t = 100 years that would be = 100 x 365.26 days x 24 hours x 60 minute x 60 seconds
Then t = 36526 x 24 x 3600 seconds in 100 years
In a circle for every 24 hours x 3600 seconds there is = 360 degrees x 3600 seconds
Or, for every one 1 time second = 15 arc second
And (Γ - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) ²
For Mercury: (Γ - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (18.1/300,000) ²
= - 43.0 arc sec per century
For a full cycle: it is 86 Arc seconds per century.
For Venus Velocity instead of Earth's Velocity
That is: 35.1[Venus orbital speed] + 6.52 [Venus spin speed] - 29.8 = 11.82 km/sec
Half - (Γ - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) ² = 4.592821605
Of arc sec per century
Full (Γ - t) = - 2 x 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) ² = 9.18654321
After 400 years of stupidity in reading telescopes it is time to tell the crooks and idiots:
(Γ - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) ²

This is the proof of relativity stupidity
Then In 1975 with school life ended I became a practicing Physicist at age 17.
In 1975 I found complex numbers and it changed everything.
Math pages VI
Γ = Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t e ỉ θ
Γ (x) = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}}
Γ(x) - t = 2 t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}
Astronomers use 1/2 cycle
Then (Γ - t)/2 = - t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v << c
Then (Γ - t)/2 = - (t /4) (v/c) ² seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycles
And (Γ - t)/2 = - 15 (t /4) (v/c) ² arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle
= 3.75 t (v/c) ² arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle
When we measure the orbit of planet Mercury we use v = velocity of mercury - velocity of
earth = 47.9 km - 29.8 km = 18.1 km; v = 300,000 km/sec
If t = 100 years that would be = 100 x 365.26 days x 24 hours x 60 minute x 60 seconds
Then t = 36526 x 24 x 3600 seconds in 100 years
In a circle for every 24 hours x 3600 seconds there is = 360 degrees x 3600 seconds
Or, for every one 1 time second = 15 arc second
And (Γ - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) ²
For Mercury: (Γ - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (18.1/300,000) ²
= - 43.0 arc sec per century
For a full cycle: it is 86 Arc seconds per century.
For Venus Velocity instead of Earth's Velocity
That is: 35.1[Venus orbital speed] + 6.52 [Venus spin speed] - 29.8 = 11.82 km/sec
Half - (Γ - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) ² = 4.592821605
Full (Γ - t) = - 2 x 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) ² = 9.18654321
After 400 years of stupidity in reading telescopes it is time to tell the crooks and idiots:
(Γ - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) ²

In 1974 I had found Schaum's outline series and in 1975 I bought three of them
and in 1975 I had a dozen and in 1976 I had a shelf full of them and every solution
and mechanics book I could put my hands on
Γ = t + (Γ - t)
Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)
Γ = t (Γ/t)
ỉωt ỉωt
Δ Γ (x) = Γ (x) - t = - 2 sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}
Then it hit me hard in 1976
Where in Mechanics I can find this equation?
Math pages VII

ỉωt ỉωt
Γ=t e ; Γ/t = e ; ω t = arc tan (v/c)
time
Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics
What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays
What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects.
Quantum = Newton + relativity
Γ = t + (Γ - t)
Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)
Γ = t (Γ/t)
ỉωt ỉωt
Δ Γ (x) = Γ (x) - t = - 2 sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}
This is time delays and this formula erases Einstein's relativity in its entirety and all of
relativity based theories
Relativistic confusions is time delays
In 1976 I started figuring out the whole thing
Chapter one: Real time mathematics
Real time location
An object at an absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factor
[λ ] t [ỉ ω (r)] t [λ + ỉ
of ℮ (r) and a rotation motion factor of ℮ is introduced to a total factor of ℮ (r)
ω (r)] t [λ
and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as: S = r ℮
(r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
1- Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.
time
Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics
What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays
Γ = t + (Γ - t) Equation 1- a
Γ=t+ΔΓ Equation 1- b
2 - Real time location
An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factor
[λ ] t [ỉ ω (r)] t [λ + ỉ
of ℮ (r) and a rotation motion factor of ℮ is introduced to a total factor of ℮ (r)
ω (r)] t
and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as:
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮ Equations 2
3 - A - Real time location along the line of measurement and

B - Real time location Perpendicular to the line of measurement.
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t [λ (r)] t

S=r℮ =r℮ ℮ ỉ ω (r) t
[λ (r)] t
S = S x+ ỉ S y= r ℮ [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
Real time location along the line of measurement is

[λ ] t
S x = r ℮ (r) cosine ω t Equations 3- a
[λ (r)] t
S x= r ℮ √ [1 - sine² ω t]
Real time location perpendicular to the line of measurement is
λ t
S y = r ℮ [ (r)] sine ω t Equations 3 - b
4 - Real time location in rectangular coordinates
Location r = x î + y ĵ + z k
Velocity v = (d x/d t) î (d y/d t) ĵ + (d z/d t) k
Acceleration γ = (d²x/dt²) î (d²y/dt²) ĵ + (d²z/dt²) k
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = [x î + y ĵ + z k] ℮ Equations 4
5 - Real time location in Polar Coordinates
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r r (1) ℮ Equations 5
6 - Real time location in Cylindrical coordinates system
Location r = ρ ρ (1) + z
Velocity v = ρ ' ρ (1) + r θ' θ (1) + z';
Acceleration γ = (ρ " - ρ θ'²) ρ (1) + (2 ρ 'θ' + ρ θ") θ (1) + z''
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = [ρ ρ (1) + z] ℮ Equations 6
7 - Real time location in Spherical coordinates system
Location r = r [r, θ, φ] = r r (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' sine φ θ (1) + r φ' φ (1)
Acceleration γ = [r" - r (θ'²sine²φ + φ'²)] r (1) + [1/rsine φ] [d (r² θ' sine² φ)/d t] θ (1)
+ {(1/r) [d (r²φ')/d t] - r θ'² sine φ cosine φ} φ (1)
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r r (1) ℮ (r) Equations 7
8 - Real time Velocity

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Let S = r ℮ (r)
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then Velocity = P = d S /d t = {[(d r/ d t) + r [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
P = {[v + r [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮ Equation 8
9 - Real time Acceleration

F = d P/ d t = d ² S/ d t²
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
F = {γ + 2 ỉ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] v - [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] ² r} ℮ (r) Equation 9
10 - A - Real time location rotational aberration along the line of measurement and
B-Real time location rotational aberration perpendicular to the line of measurement
Taking ω (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocity

Velocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line of
measurement velocity
Along the line of measurement
[λ ] t
Then S x = r ℮ (r) √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)] Equation 10 - a
Perpendicular to line of measurements
λ t
And S y = r ℮ [ (r)] sine arc tan (v/c) Equation 10 - b
11 - Real time location motion rotational aberrations Visual effects:

A - Along the line of measurement
B - Perpendicular to the line of measurement
[λ ] t
S x = r ℮ (r) √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
With λ (r) = 0
Then
S x = r √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)] Equation 11 - a
With (v/c) << 1
Then S x = r √ [1 - (v/c) ²] Equation 11 - b
This Equation (5 - b) is Lorentz's along the line of measurement length contraction 150
years historical mistake
With λ (r) = 0
S y = r sine arc tan (v/c) Equation 11 - c
With (v/c) << 1
S y = r (v/c) Equation 11 - d
This Equation (5 - d) is Lorentz's perpendicular to the line of measurement length
contraction 150 years historical mistake
12 - Real time location motion translational aberrations Visual effects:
[λ (r)] t
S x= r ℮ √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
With λ (r) ≠ 0; v = 0
Then along the line of measurement
[λ ] t
S x = r ℮ (r) Equation 12 - a
S y = r sine arc tan (v/c)

With λ (r) ≠ 0; v = 0
Then perpendicular to the line of measurement
[λ ] t
S y = r ℮ (r) Equation 12 - b
And
[λ ] t
S x = S y = r ℮ (r) Equation 12- c
13 - Real time
[λ +ỉω ]t
S = r ℮ (r) (r)
S=cΓ
And r = c t
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Γ = t ℮ (r)
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
P = {[v + r [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
F = {γ + 2 ỉ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] v - [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] ² r} ℮
14 - Time delays concepts
C - Real time delays
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r ℮ (r)
S=cΓ
And r = c t
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Γ = t ℮ (r)
Γ = t {cosine [λ (r) + ω (r)] t + ỉ sine [λ (r) + ω (r)] t}
With λ (r) = 0
Taking ω (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocity
Velocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line of
measurement velocity
[ỉ ω (r)] t
With λ = 0; Γ = t ℮
And Γ = t [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
And Γ (x) = t cosine ω t = t [1 - 2 sine ² (ω t/2)]
Δ Γ = Γ (x) - t = - 2 t sine ² (ω t/2)
Γ (x) = t cosine ω (r) t = t √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
Γ (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c)
With (v/c) << 1
Along the line of measurement Γ (x) = t √ [1 - (v/c) ²]
Perpendicular to the line of measurement Γ (y) = t (v/c)
15 - Time delays applications I planetary and binary stars motion
[Villanova University Relativity Stupidity]

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Γ = t ℮ (r)
Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² (ω t/2)
Δ Γ/2 = - t sine ² (ω t/2)
Γ = t + [Γ - t]
This addition operation can be a multiplication
Or, Γ = t [Γ/t]
The definition of a visual Illusion time delay is
ỉθ
Γ/t = cosine θ + ỉ sine θ = ℮ ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
With v = relative velocity and c = velocity of light.
ỉθ
Γ = t ℮ this formula is the magic sock of Physics or the Bully equation
Real time = event time x Visual effects
ỉθ
Γ = Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t ℮ = t [cosine θ + ỉ sine θ]
Γ (x) = t cosine θ = t [1 - 2 sine² (θ/2)]
Γ (x) - t = - 2 t sin² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}
Δ Γ = - 2 t sin² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

Δ Γ = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c]
sec/ century
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v +/-
v*)/c] arc sec/century
Since idiots are idiots and some times 1/2 period scientists use instead of a full period you
would find many cases that two Astrophysicists give an answer and one double the other's
answer like in the most famous case in astronomy and that would be Dr Guinan of Villanova
University with DI Herculis apsidal motion of 0.65° 1985 and DR Martynov of 1.3° in 2008.
Earth velocity is 29.8 km/sec

Venus velocity is 35.1km/sec
Mars velocity is 47.9 km/sec
DI Herculis is 103.5 km/sec
In case of mercury they use 1/2 cycle or use Venus orbit to calculate Mercury because
Mercury is closer to the sun and disappears more than Venus and Venus is a bright planet
that looks like a star.
In the original calculation of 1859 the used 1/2 cycle because of the
proximity of Mercury to the SUN
And Δ Γ = - 15x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc
sec/century
With v = 47.9 km/sec and v* = 29.8
Δ Γ = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(47.9 - 29.8)/c] arc

sec/century
= 43.0 arc second per century
Then they later came and used Venus as reference for measuring and
used full cycle because Venus look like a morning star and can be seen
better
If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Mercury - Orbital velocity of

Venus
Δ Γ = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan (47.9 - 35.1/300,000)
sec
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan (47.9 -
35.1/300,000)
= 43.0 arc per century for mercury.
Venus is bright like a star and it is used to calculate Mercury's orbit.
If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Venus - Orbital velocity of

Earth
29.8/300,000)
= 8.3 arc sec per century for Venus
Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit.

This same formula applies to stars
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc
sec/century
DI Herculis
It all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period
sec/century
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/sec

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec
With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2 =103.5887398km/sec
And v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398
sec/century
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan
[(133.39)/300,000]
= 1.3° arc sec/century
In the 1/2 period method
Δ Γ = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc
sec/century
= 1.3 °/2 = 0.65°
Go to NASA Website SAO/NASA see how their PHD'S are more like of GED'S and type:
Apsidal motion 1985 and pick up the article written by Villanova 5th grades
And then type: Apsidal motion 2010 and pick up the article written by the same Kinder
Gardeners Dr Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney
16 - Time delays and the creation of elementary particles
Looting DOE and other USA government institutions is a common place because corporate
academia of western nations will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs
money prestige Nobel Prizes and no physics and because western politician are corporate
corrupt and shallow science educated politicians and will give a bucket of money for a
bucket full of nothing because money is not coming out from their pockets and they have no
clue what they are paying except they are told it is good! It is stinking well and they are
paying nothing and nothing is dark energy. To prove dark energy exists for a scientifically
ignorant government and looting scientists, scientists took a bucket with a phototube
registering flashes between two elevations. The difference in count is taken as proof of the
existence of elementary nuclear particles and dark energy. I Joe Nahhas have had accused
western scientists of fraud since July 4th, 1973 and this article is part of the proof that at least
88.88 % of western physicists published work is fraud and fraud is dark energy.
Introduction: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of
science. The death of E = mc² in inevitable because it was based on visual illusion. Visual
Illusions is a characteristic of the nuclear world and they are a result of bad measurements.
Measurements are done wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.
Want to see how E = mc² trick? It is shown below but for now read this
Time dilations tricks are scatter experiments. I taught in colleges for few years and I can
explain it and it is called Scatter and not time dilations.
Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays Physics

T is real time = t is event time + [T - t; real time - event time]
T = t + [T- t]
T=T
T = t [T/t]
ỉθ
T/t = e ; θ = arc tan (v/c) this is the magic sock equation for looting
ỉθ
T = t e = t [cosine θ + ỉ sine θ]
T = T (x) + ỉ T (y) = t [cosine θ + ỉ sine θ]
T (x) = = t cosine θ = t [1 - 2 sine² (θ/2)]
Δ Γ = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine² (θ/2)
Δ Γ = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}
Δ Γ = - 2 t sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}
With (v/c) = 1/n = 1/1.0003 = n = index of refraction of air

Δ Γ = - 2 t sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]}
Δ Γ/t = - 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]}
Δ Γ/t = - 0.292787177
Δ Γ/t = - 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e
- 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}
N = N (0) e
Δ Γ/t = - 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
- 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
In an MIT 1962 video that is sold and distributed around the world two gentlemen had a Bucket
with a photo sensor inside it registering flashes between two elevations at a mountain top and
at sea level
The vertical showers of μ - Meson were counted through a horizontal counter:

On a mountain top of 1.943 km height ....... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour
At sea Level.......................................... 412 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour
This count is given as experimental proof of the existence of μ - Mesons and time dilations.
Is this time dilation?

Absolutely not!
1943 meters height **************************
1500 meters height * *** * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * ****
1500 meters height * *** ** * *** * *** * ** * *** * ** * ** * *** * ** * *
1000 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** *** ** * ***
0500 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** ***
I say this is not time dilations but diffraction due to an increase of air density between the two
different locations and here is the proof
- 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
- 0.292787177
N = 564 e = 420.8640 --------------------------------- One
From this equation
│Δ Γ/t │= │- 0.292787177│= 0.292787177
And τ = Δ Γ = 0.292787177 t = 0.292787177 (y/c) = 0.292787177 (1.943km/300,000km)

-6
τ = 1.896 micro seconds ≈ 2 x 10 sec --------------------------------------- two
With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time
now mass become an easier made -up. When the mass of μ - Muon were to be measured
cloud chambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393,
from published data and if we take n as 1.393,
Δ Γ/t = - 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]}

Δ Γ/t = - 0.187647831
│Δ Γ/t │= │0.187647831│= 0.187647831
Δ Γ/t 1/0.187647931
With m = m (0) e = m (e) e
And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three
This is the mass of the μ - Meson; or, μ - Muon
This can be done with more accurate results and can be seen from a totally different new
view point
And use (v/c) = 1/d; d = density of air at 1 km half distance = 1/1.07; engineering tables.
ỉθ
Then, T = t e ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
ỉθ
Means N = N (0) e ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
ỉθ
And m = m (0) e ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
ỉθ
Δ Γ = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine² (θ/2)
T (x) = = t cosine θ = t cosine arc tan (v/c)

Then N (x) = = N (0) cosine θ = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)
N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)
And m (x) = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)
A- N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (1/d)
N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan (1/1.07)

N (x) = 412.089522
B - T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)

T (x) = (1.943/300,000) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)
-6
T (x) = 2.054368496 x 10 sec
C - We should have m = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)
If you use T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)

And Δ Γ/ t = 2 t sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}
And Δ Γ/ t = 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/n)]}
And Δ Γ/ t = 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]}
And Δ Γ/ t = 0.187647931
t/Δ Γ 1/0.187647931
And m = m (0) e = m (0) e
With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time
now mass become an easier made -up. When the mass of μ - Muon were to be measured
cloud chambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393,
from published data and if we take n as 1.393,
What happened is the amount of diffracted electrons was considered as the mass of a new
particle when it is an average of 206.79 electrons. What I am saying is that the "Atom" is
white man trash and thanks to: or (564 - 412) x [564/4l2] ≈ 206.79
17 -
15 - Real time Straight line
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r ℮ (r)
With λ (r) = 0
[ỉ ω (r)] t
Then S = r ℮ = r [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
Let r = r î = v t î
Then S = v t î [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
S x + ỉ S y = v t î [cosine ω t] + v t î [ỉ sine ω t]
S x = v t cosine ω t
Perpendicular to the line of measurement
S y = v t sine ω t
At time of measurement w t = arc tan (v/c)
S x = v t cosine arc tan (v/c)
S y = v t sine arc tan (v/c)
If v = c
Then S x = v t cosine arc tan (v/c) = c t cosine arc tan (c/c) = c t cosine (π/4) = c t /√ 2
S y = v t sine arc tan (v/c) = c t sine arc tan (c/c) = c t sine (π/4) = c t /√ 2
S=ct
If r = r (0)
S x = r (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) = r (0) √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
S y = r (0) sine arc tan (v/c)
If v << 1 then
S x = r (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) = r (0) √ [1 - (v/c) ²]
S y = r (0) (v/c)
16 - Real time circular motion

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r ℮ (r)
ỉθ
And r = r ℮ r (1)
ỉθ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮ ℮ r (1)
[λ (r)] t + ỉ [θ + ω (r) t]
S=r℮ r (1)
[λ (r)] t + ỉ [θ + ω (r) t]
S=r℮
With λ (r) = 0
ỉ [θ + ω (r) t]
S=r℮
17 - Real time clock wise circular motion
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
S = r ℮ (r)
-ỉ θ
And r = r ℮ r (1)
-ỉ θ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
S=r℮ ℮ r (1)
[λ (r)] t - ỉ [θ - ω (r) t]
S=r℮ r (1)
[λ (r)] t - ỉ [θ - ω (r) t]
S=r℮
With λ (r) = 0
- ỉ [θ - ω (r) t]
S=r℮
18 - Real time angular velocity

Is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r
And ω = + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
18 - Real time Areal velocity

A = │r x d r/2│
Areal velocity: d A/d t = │r x (d r/2d t)│= │r x v/2│
And │S x (d S/2d t) │= │S x P/2│
℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t x {[v + r [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t}/2│
=│ r
2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
=│r x v/2│℮
2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
│S x P/2 │=│r x v/2│℮
19 - Real time Areal velocity in polar coordinates

2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
│S x P/2 │=│r x v/2│℮
= │[r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)]/2│
2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
= (r² θ'/2) [℮ ]
20 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects in polar coordinates

2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
│S x P/2 │=│r x v/2│℮
= │[r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)]/2│
2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
= (r² θ'/2) [℮ ]
With λ (r) = 0
2 ỉ ω (r) t
│S x P/2 │= (r² θ'/2) [℮ ]
21 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects delay factor in polar coordinates
2 [λ +ỉω ]t
│S x P/2 │=│r x v/2│℮ (r) (r)
= │[r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)]/2│

2 [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
= (r² θ'/2) [℮ ]
With λ (r) = 0
2 ỉ ω (r) t
│S x P/2 │= (r² θ'/2) [℮ ]
= (r² θ'/2) [cosine 2 ω t + ỉ sine 2 ω t]
│S x P/2 │(x) = (r² θ'/2) cosine 2 ω t
= (r² θ'/2) [1 - sine² ω t]
│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = - r² θ' sine² ω t
Approximation
│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = - r² θ' sine² ω t

With ω T = arc tan (v/c)
│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = - r² θ' sine² arc tan (v/c)
With (v/c) << 1
Then │S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = - r² θ' (v/c) ²
22- Real time Areal velocity visual effects for an ellipse

Then │S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = - r² θ' (v/c) ²
With r² θ' = 2 π a b
Then │S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2) = [- 2 π a b/T] (v/c) ²
23 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects

{│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2)} 2/a² (1 - ε) ²} = [- 2 π a b/T] (v/c) ² [2/ a² (1 - ε) ²]
= - 4 π (b/a) (v/c) ²/ T (1 - ε) ²
= - 4 π {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ T (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
24 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects in arc sec/ century.

{│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2)} 2/a² (1 - ε) ²} = - 4 π {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
{(180/π) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
25 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet mercury in arc sec/ century.

{│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2)} 2/a² (1 - ε) ²} = - 4 π {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
{(180/π) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
With ε = .206, T = 88; v = v* + v°; v* = orbital velocity = 47.9 km/sec v ° = spin speed of
observer on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. v = v* + v° = 48.2 km/sec; v° (mercury) = 3 m/s
And W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
= [-720x36526x3600/88] (1.552) (48.2/300,000) ²
= 43.10 Arc sec /century
26 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet Venus in arc sec/ century.
{│S x P/2 │(x) - (r² θ'/2)} 2/a² (1 - ε) ²} = - 4 π {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²

{(180/π) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
With ε = .206, T = 244.7; v = v* + v°; v* = orbital velocity = 35.12 km/sec v ° = spin speed
of observer on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. And v° (Mercury) = 6.52km/sec
v = v* + v° = 41.94 km/sec
And W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ²
= [-720x36526x3600/244.7] (1.00761) (41.94/300,000) ²
= 8.17 Arc sec /century
27 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc sec/century

W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
29 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720x36526/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
30 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/year

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
31 - Binary stars apsidal motion delays in arc degree/cycle

W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
32 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per century:

W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
33 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /century

34 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per year:

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
35 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree per year:

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
36 - Global Positioning Systems delays in arc degree per cycle:

W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
37- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per cycle:

38- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per day:

W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
39- Global Positioning Systems delays in second per cycle:

W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century
40 - Global Positioning Systems delays in second per day:

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² sec/day
41 - Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) ² sec/day
42- Application of Global positioning system
GPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period; ε = 0

And v° = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed;
And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/second
Then v* +/- v° = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second

We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are opposite
GPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc
W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° +/- v*)/c] ² seconds/day
W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] ² seconds of arc /1 day
W" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by
24hours/360degress = 15
U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/day

U = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day
43 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays

Δ Γ = [16π G M/c³] [1 +/- (v°/v*)] ²
44 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays Nahhas
constant
Γ (0) = 16π G M/c³ = 247.597 μ s
45 - Mars telecommunications around the sun time delays Shapiro's historical mistake
Δ Γ = [16π G M/c³] [1 + (v°/v*)] ² = 250 μ s
46 - Circular motion Advance of starting point visual effects

W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] (v/c) ² arc sec/ century; ε = 0
47- Time Factor
S x = r √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]

S x = r √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
If (v/c) = (1/n) = (1/ refractive index) and the velocity is constant in absolute value
Or S x = c Γ (x) and r = c t; then
Γ (x) = t √ [1 - sine² arc tan (v/c)]
Γ (x) = t √ [1 - sine² arc tan (1/n)]
Perpendicular to the line of measurement
And Γ (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c) = t sine arc tan (1/n)
48 - Reines and Cowans: 1953 Savannah River Neutrino experiment historical mistake
Γ (x) = t √ [1 - sine² arc tan (1/n)]
With t = 25 μ s
And n of water = 1.33 < n < 1.44 = n of tri ethyl benzene
Γ (x) = t √ [1 - sine² arc tan (1/n)]
4.67 μ s < Γ (x) < 5 μ s
After I knew how timing and visual illusion scientists have had created a world of
physics that does not exist
Relativity theory and quantum mechanics must be wrong

1 - Special relativity theory Space time illusion that no one know how?
a- Length contraction
b - Time dilations
c - Constant velocity of light
d- Momentum
e - Mass
f- Mass energy
2 - Dark energy that is there but not detected

3 - Elementary particles
4 - Big bang
5- Expanding Universe?
Etc.
What is the Alternative?
Newton's equations solved wrong for 350 years

Abstract: This is the real time solution to the problem of planetary system motion around
their motion sun and the solution to the 350 years advance of perihelion/apsidal motion
puzzle. This is the proof that the motion of planets around their mother sun is an ellipse and
a real time "apparent" visual effect advance of perihelion/ apsidal motion.

Real time solution is:

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r)
[λ +ỉω ]t
Real time mass m = m (θ, 0) ℮ (m) (m)
"Apparent advance of perihelion"

Proof:
With (2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

= H (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r² (0, 0) θ' (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ' (θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] h (θ, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, t)] [r² (θ, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, 0) m² (0, t)] [r² (θ, 0) r² (0, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, 0) m² (0, t)] [r² (θ, 0) r² (0, t)] [θ'(θ, 0) θ' (0, t)]

Divide by m²r²θ'
Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]
And θ"/θ' = -2{λ (m) + λ (r) + ỉ [ω (m) + ω (r)]}
Then (m'/m) = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]

Or d m/m d t = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]
[λ + ỉ ω (m)] t
Then m = m (0) ℮ (m)
[λ +ỉω ]t
And m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) = ℮ (m) (m)
[λ + ỉ ω (m)] t
And m = m (θ, 0) m (0, t) = m (θ, 0) ℮ (m)
And m (0, t) = Exp [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] t
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Also, r = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) ℮ (r)
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With r (0, t) = ℮
Then θ'(θ, t) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (θ, 0) r (θ, 0)]} ℮ -2{[λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] + [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]} t
-2{[λ +ỉω ] + [λ +ỉω ]} t
And θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0)] ℮ (m) (m) (m) (m)
And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t)

-2{[λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] + [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]} t
And θ' (0, t) = ℮
Also θ'(θ, 0) = H (θ, 0)/ m² (θ, 0) r² (θ, 0)
And θ'(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (0, 0) r (0, 0)]}
Let m r =1/u

[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) M/ H²
t = 0; m³ (0, 0) = 1
= [h²/Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ (1 + ε cosine θ)

c=εa
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
This is the equation I was looking for

This equation is real time Universal mechanics
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
This: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment
If time is frozen that is t = 0
Then r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II
Relativistic is the difference between I and II
And it is the visual illusion between motion II and Visual motion I
The difference between and event and its measurement in real time
It is like you are looking at a person in a dark empty room dancing and you
pointed a flash light looking at him/her. You will see the person and his
shadow
[Person + shadow] = person + shadow
Re- writing Modern physics and the history of physics is the intention of this book
Unless Physicists can bring back Einstein to drive the time travel bus and make a
jump from space to time to go see a 1956 live Elvis show in Tupelo Mississippi and
bring the Bus back from time road to Highway roads then physicists are lying and
lying is "University" Professors is job # 1. Giving stupidity a Nobel Prize does not
make it science but stupidity with a Nobel tag and that would make it Nobel
stupidity and not science. The only proof of space-time physics is that there is no
proof of space time physics, a case of 110 years of lying Nobel Prize winner physics
and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and astronomers who can not read their
scopes. It is not just about dumping relativity theory and quantum mechanics but it
is about dumping relativity theory and quantum both used for Nature's descriptions
with the 100,000 living space-timers physicists and the 100,000 dead space - time
physicists attached to it. The extremely high price tag of experimentations in Modern
Physics and the mass- production of college educated physicists in big institutions
with "well" rounded ideology since the start of the industrial revolution and never
stopped have/had created the need for massive funding. Limited funding and
shallow education have created "Paper Physicists" or "Physicists without labs" or
"cost cutter" experiments and back yard physics experiments and "garage sale"
physics and "flea market" physics ideas and "junk" on a round rotating table
theories and experiments and physics bake sale funds or packaged physics for sale
funds or doing without experimentations and accepting "thought" experiments
replacement to actual labs as valid without proof. What happens when funds are not
enough? Or what happens when funds were enough and "results" were expected
and "No" discovery? Or what happens when "discovery" needed for generating funds
and there was no discovery? It is called "other skills" or survival skills or "rigging'!
Physicists have had rigged their experiments and data since the start of the
industrial revolution and physicists will say anything publish anything based on
nothing for jobs money and prestige and trash for physics because the banker and
the administrators and not the scientists determine the outcome of science and
what the world ended up with a breed of physicists with at least 88.88 % of all
physics and physicists can be shipped to Macdonald's without loss to the subject of
physics and at the top Nobel prize winners physicists. This kind of "on demand"
business survival skills that is the common practice of today's prestigious claims self
graded institutions like Harvard MIT Cal-Tech NASA Oxford Cambridge Paris Berlin
Moscow Tokyo Beijing and other funds hungry institutions have reduced physics to a
commodity for funding survival skills first and science if science is to be found. The
solution of "University" + science if science is to be found or made up science of
mostly bad science kept and keep going and the new colonies of Academia
institutions with huge budget needs added their own needs for scientific buffing and
fraud since their existence when needed if necessary at first and most of the time
"paper physics" and no physics and sometimes all that was required from scientists
is products or "papers" in a scientific journals and not necessarily science or using
scientific methods. This state of low grade institutions and high rate claims have led
to institutionalized "Physics business" and like every business it comes with fraud
but with no accountability science became mostly organized fraud. The bad behavior
of shallow education and made up science and lobbied claims had opened a "Mall"
where Physicists in white ropes and "handymen in white ropes" can be exchanged
without loss of physics subject. Today physics is a business and not necessarily
science or scientific and the pile of "trash" and physics tag is so high it stinks. What
I call all the claims and the successes of Modern Physics? They are old physics ideas
and technological successes and not physics successes and have little to do with
modern physics and if all the successes of physics were to be added only 11.2 % is
science and 88.88 % organized fraud. The atomic age started with the publications
of the chemical periodic table by a chemist and it did not start with physics or
physicists. The nuclear age was started by the accidental fission discovery by
accident and by chemists and not physicists. Light was accidentally discovered by
Edison. The internet is an old physics idea of sending information through solid
objects like wires or wireless like voice or signals that technologist kept improving
and it was a know phenomenon for centuries and when lab techs learned that it go
fast in wires if it was to be pushed through wires and were successfully pushed
through telegrams came out then telephone then cable then internet etc. What is
taught in physics classrooms today is mostly bad physics. Time travel is not physics.
Dark energy is not physics. Big bang is not physics. Relativity theory is not physics.
Quantum mechanics is not physics. The Atom is not physics. Physicists say all of
that is physics and they all say it without one single proof and what they present as
proof amount to nothing, absolutely garbage and stupidity based on visual illusions
and not single proof of its existence. Have you seen an Atom? Have you time
traveled? Do you have a basket of dark energy? Etc
Building Modern physics on a time dimension and not a time scale have/had changed
physics to fiction and science to stupidity and stupidity is Einstein's space - time
continuum and quantum mechanics illusions of physics. I am not only saying that Alfred
Nobel prize winners are idiots but the purpose of writing this book is to hand Nobel prize
winners physicists and all their followers the proof that they are Nobel idiots and 1/2. Big
academic Institution funding needs superseded the ultimatum needs that science has to
stay science to serve humanity and not a fund raiser for jobs raising money and prestige
to raise more money and become a bigger richer more prestigious monster and ugly
distraction to science. The purpose of science is to study nature and use it for the benefit
of the livings because life is what matters and life is dependent on it and science is not to
be a monopoly for the few power houses and a fund raiser for its member welfare and
their donor welfare alone. Big institutions under no accountability laws fabricated and
manufactured garbage and lobbied for trade mark of excellence logos to cash funds and
donations and that dragged science to stupidity and stupidity worked for a while till all
there is left in class rooms and scientific calculation is stupidity itself to fund the mother of
all stupidity proudly called "university" and University was used to serve their corporate
bosses and all the crooks at the end of the day meet at the bank. Big institutions took
science and made it stupidity and kept it there and tagging stupidity with Alfred Nobel
logo does not make it science. Science made by funds of government, corporate, donor,
bankers and other economical political and financial institutions and individuals is good if
and only if those funds are used to produce science and not Nobel stupidity and called
science or became because restrictions and guarantees were attached to the check given
to physicists. When "University" became a shop selling at least 88.88 % Nobel stupidity,
then it is time to point a finger at Alfred Nobel institutions and expose not only their
stupidity but also their crimes against humanity and Nature for wasting resources and
blocking progress and it is the subject of this book. It is the intention of this book to show
that Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists are at least 88.88 % Nobel not
stupid but rather crooks and stupidity on top of that and physicists are people who will
say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige and 88.88 %
garbage for science.
Universities research centers and corporate science shops practices are not at all designed
to serving humanity but are serving few University humans that is they are serving
"University" and who ever has something to do with their pay rate. University serving
"humanity" is a myth and a logo and nothing close to a fact. Serving humanity is
producing science without harming life. Human progress is useful science less harm and
academic fraud is as harmful as harmful science. Attempting to find new science and
when science is not found the using of the alternative methods of science fabrication and
lobbying to sell bad science and going forward at all cost to sell anything as science to
meet payrolls and the demands of the check giver economical political and Ideological
agenda is "University". Institutions operating on academic fraud as needed and operating
on self graded portfolio is "University" and not necessarily science or scientific. Academic
fraud is 88.88 % of Modern science and this book is to uncover it. Stupidity is at least
88.88 % of Modern Physics and young minds stuck with stupidity and are told it is ok if
you feel stupid and do not understand it. Corporate - University imposed stupidity add a
shallow traditional education stupidity added up and now it is a mountain high stupidity
that "University" created and practiced. University professors and administrators are not
capable of freeing itself from stupidity because in the past "University" lobbied for Nobel
Prize for stupidity and the fall is so deep nothing less than bringing down the house of
Nobel stupidity will work. Space - time quantum relativistic mechanics or the crown Jewel
of physics backed by 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists or Modern
Physics is stupidity itself came up by "University" Mafia with "PHD" weapons "Innovation"
logo that engaged in funding wars and fought wars on college campuses and congress and
corporate hallways to reach the meeting at the bank on time to loot money for funding
themselves have had taken science and made 88.88 % stupidity and stupidity address is
"University" academia classrooms and labs magazines and journals TV Radio and internet
or wherever a professor happened to go. Scientists said anything published anything
based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel prizes and cock roach ideas for science.
Furthermore, they rigged and packaged bad science to raise money directed to the public
to create a myth of scientific superiority for scientifically ignorant as corrupt USA and
mostly western governments and mostly eastern followers and donors for all of past
century and in the process humanity stuck with stupidity coming out from Alfred Nobel
Prize winner mouth. Self graded Academia of Harvard MIT Cal - Tech Stanford Oxford
Paris Berlin Moscow Beijing and all self graded monopoly academia time is up and the
public brain washing is about to be given antidote or as ugly as can be proof warning
them of the gruesome consequences to trust a not trustworthy corrupt not ethical lying
cheating "NO" professors. Without accountability guidelines and self respect rules
classrooms science is mostly stupidity.
This book is to show why students should stop their professors and not to accept stupidity
as science and stupidity is Alfred Nobel prize winner science. I am not only saying Dr
Albert Einstein or Dr Feynman or Dr Reines Or Dr Zewail were wrong or bad physicists but
what I am saying that all physicists were wrong and were wrong physicists for past 350
years and Alfred Nobel Prize winners like Albert Einstein or Richard Feynman are wrong
physicists to say the least and it is the subject of this book. It is my intention of this book
to show why Einstein is wrong and why relativity is stupidity and why quantum mechanics
is garbage and I challenge all to prove me wrong. Modern Physics and all of Physics is
wrong for past 350 years because a banker decided what is science and what is for dinner
What are wrong in all of science are measurements and at the start of the industrial
revolution the time - dependent measurements were taken wrong and correcting time -
dependent measurements will bring back physics and take away Alfred Nobel prize
winners stupidity.
Energy needs of humans supersede the funding needs or prestige pride of

big institutions bureaucracies that needs massive funding first and
science if found last and that produced claims of science for funding
purposes and delivered mostly hoaxes of science at best. It is time to
expose academic fraud that became job # 1 for the entire western
academia. Worse than that they fought battles for jobs money prestige
and hired lobbyists and made up science to stay alive. Much worse than
that they created a monopoly on science and science publications to
cover their trail of stinking practices and built power relations with
corporate powerhouses and corrupt governments to cater for them and in
return these big institutions helped corporate power houses to create
corporate governments and laws to fit corporate needs and their needs
and necessarily national needs or human needs and shielded themselves
with Iconic figures of greatness much more their worth if they were worth
anything at all. Time travel is not physics and using time as a dimension
reduced physics to fiction and the visual illusions used for 110 years the
age of Nobel stupidity as experimental proofs of Modern physics is
nothing and does not impress me because I can prove it as visual Illusion
using the same data that is used to prove it right I can prove it wrong.
Furthermore, I can prove Modern physics is at least 88.88 % organized
fraud.
The elimination of relativity theory stupidity and quantum

confusions of physics from classrooms and scientific calculations
is a matter of time and not a matter of science because I can
prove it as not science and not scientific scientific.
Stupidity starts with Einstein's relativity theory and expands to Quantum

confusions of physics and this is the subject of this book is to show
without a doubt how physics is rigged and how physicists build a 10 foot
pole up the public pockets welfare and deceived all and made fools out of
themselves and how they fought for prizes to generate funds and no
physics. I am not only saying they are fraud I am writing this book to
uncover their fraud. Modern Physics is mostly visual effects and visual
effects made them magicians and where visual effects were useful we had
successes like cinema movies radios and telecommunications and
microscopes and telescopes and everything else is trash and the good
reason I am writing this book is that all the energy in physics research is
fraud and the cost is "Billions" a month and definitely is a stinking trash
and walking the dog science at best. The acceptance of non visualized
four-dimensional space- to imaginary time - back to space confusion of
physics opened a Zoo section inside the mall of physics and "Paper"
physicists changed the mall of Physics to a virtual Zoo and absolutely no
physics. It is not just about dumping relativity theory but it is about
dumping relativity theory and the 1000 physics organized institutional
fraud attached to it. Humans energy needs supersedes institutional
survival needs and it is time not to be sincere and seek recognition of
new ideas but it is time to bring down the house with new ideas and ring
the bell ending the 100,000 space-timers food stamps wages and make
them go to work or take make-believe time travel bus one way ticket and
do not come back! And to make sure Einstein is the bus driver and on
front seat are Alfred Nobel Prize merchants of stupidity. Here is the blue
print wood and nails of relativity theory coffin. Here is the blue print wood
and nails of quantum confusions coffin. Here is the blue prints wood and
nails of dark energy coffin and a broom to clean up Alfred Nobel winner's
stupidity.
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m at a location r and spin s. Finding the
relation between m, r, and s is the correct path toward finding new sources of energy.
Everything else is academic trash and no physics. Energy spent is based on distance
traveled and not relative distance and yes Einstein is wrong and he can keep his mouth
shut along with Alfred Nobel physicists. It is time to tell Nobel Prize winner Physicists that
the foods stamps program has changed and it is for science hungry people only.
Abstract: Relativity theory is stupidity itself and quantum mechanics is a description of

equipment generated visual effects. Modern physics is mostly visual effects and a long list
of academic fraud and academic fraud is what I can prove and I am going to prove in this
book and I am challenging all to prove me wrong. Einstein's relativity stupidity and
quantum mechanics confusions of physics have had sunk physics in stupidity so deep it
reversed Darwin's theory to read
Ape > man > PHD > Academia > Crook > Nobel Prize > Ape Ass!
Cal - Tech Dr Richard Feynman arrogance legendary and he is a good sample and
representative of Nobel Prize academia that claim greatness and deliver Illusions. Dr
Richard is the most highly respected physicist after Einstein. Many professors on college
campuses tried to imitate him like scar face is imitated. If anyone watches Dr Feynman's
Physics lectures tapes on U tube Courtesy of M r Bill gates foundation and MSNBC, he/she
would notice and finger out Dr Feynman style of insulting others and praising self
arrogance and in particular insulting Sir Isaac Newton. First, Dr Feynman stated the laws
of Newton, then praised nature for such a divine laws raising Natural laws to be worthy of
greatness and then show his greatness by ridiculing and insulting Newton's thought and
interpretations of these laws and bringing in the experimental results of modern
technology and his own ideas of natural greatness that matches experiments with
unprecedented accuracy and statistically fits his views and general statistical laws and
work of nature he called his theory the "crown jewel of physics". Dr Feynman has one
problem that he based his work on experimentations results like Einstein did measuring
nature and he ended a victim of Nature's deceptions that fooled him and Modern
technologists and made him the one and only "crown prince of physics stupidity". Einstein
based relativity theory on "junk" experimentation and bad mathematicians doing bad
physics added to Nature's deceptions and his shallow education he became the icon of
modern physics and modern physics is stupidity itself and that I can prove and proved
started proving at very early age. Modern physics is mostly wrong physics and after
reading the next few pages I will and the reader will end Einstein's relativity theory and
quantum mechanics and worse Modern Nobel prize winners physics that is built on Nature
deceptions will be reduced to "Cock roaches" physics size ideas including relativity theory
and quantum mechanics and most of modern physics because that what is done to cock
roaches is uncovered sprayed exterminated and swept away like relativity theory is about
to be swept away along with quantum confusions of mechanics. Furthermore, a new
physics with new laws based on centuries of experimental results will replace modern
physics because they are formulas that matches experiments and are the one and only
laws that nature bowed to because it is the one and only laws that describes Nature with
unprecedented accuracy expose modern physics fraud and correct all the time. Imposters
of physicists with Nobel prizes and Nature's made grease monkeys in white robes at
physics labs with Physics Mafia department missions and food stamps programs are about
to be given 350 years of physics in real time and to be handed Alfred Nobel Prize winners
Mafia of physicists wiping stupidity with best regards
Modern Physicists Claim to Fame is that relativity theory and quantum mechanics can
explain modern phenomenon while all other theories can not explain anything and that
Newton's - Kepler's equations can not explain lots of physical Phenomenon and they
worked hard all of past century developing these ideas of Modern physics to answer all
these questions that Newton's - Kepler's physics can not answer and there is a very long
list claimed by the maniacs of all of past century that Modern physics can explain and
presentations were made in videos and can be seen on U tube video by highly rated and
low mannered professors of Modern self graded Institutions "University" physicists
including a big crowed from Alfred Nobel institutions and highly rated physics department
and physicists. It is the intent of this book to show that modern physics claims are mostly
visual effects and a case of extreme Nobel stupidity
I am going to take on the most arrogant and most notable Alfred Nobel prize winners
physics and physicists and the problems they claim that they had solved or the science
they say they produced and show it is Garbage.
1- Wave nature of light

Wave equation
Few Nobel Prize winners De Broglie; Maurice Dirac; Richard Feynman; Irwin Schwinger
2- Space - time
Length contraction
Nobel Prize winner Michelson experiment
3- Time dilations
Experimentally proven
Nobel Prize winner Pauli μ - Muons
4 - Planetary motion space - time travel

Mercury Perihelion Advance Le Verrier
Apsidal motion DI Herculis
GPS or Global positioning systems Harvard Dr Shapiro
5- Space - time dents the

1/5 amplitude
Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman
6 - Mass energy equivalence

E = mc²
Nobel Prize winner Einstein
Neutron mass
7 - Elementary particles like

Neutrinos Nobel Prize winner Reines
8 - Maxwell equations or
Magnetism Maxwell
9 - The Atom and the Atomic Bond like

Nobel Prize winner Zewail
10 - Stupidity of the atomic structure and the nuclear structure

1,000,000 Physicists chemists Engineers of past century
Newton's reply to that: There are no Physicists after me, only idiots
Here is the proof: If we take Newton's equations and solve them in real time 350 years
of physics and physicists will disappear and all found correctly in Newton's real time
equation and not only they New solution is correct but it also shows 110 years of Modern
physics and 350 years of Astronomy all wrong or in other words the true statement on
Newton's behalf is correct and I challenge all to prove me wrong
There are no physicists after me, only idiots
39 - Universal Mechanics
F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
Acceleration = a = d² r/d t²; mass acceleration = d² m/d t² = m"
A- If S = m r
∂ S/∂ m = r ∂ S/∂ r = m
And d (∂ S/∂ m)/d t = d r/d t = v d (∂ S/∂ r)/d t = d m/d t = m'
And d² (∂ S/∂ m)/d t² = d² r/d t² d² (∂ S/∂ r)/d t² = d² m/d t²
= d v/d t = a = d m'/d t = m"
B - If P = m v + m' r
∂ P/∂ m = v ∂ P/∂ v = m
∂ P/∂ m' = r ∂ P/∂ r = m'
And d (∂ P/∂ m)/d t = d v/d t = a

And d (∂ P/∂ v)/d t = d m/d t = m' d² (∂ P/∂ v)/d t² = d² m/d t² = d m'/d t = m''
And d (∂ P/∂ m')/d t = d r/d t = v d² (∂ P/∂ m')/d t² = d² r/d t² = d v/d t = a
And d (∂ P/∂ r)/d t = d m'/d t = m''
And d (∂ P/∂ v)/d t - (∂ P/∂ r) = m' - m' = 0

And d (∂ P/∂ m')/d t - (∂ P/∂ m) = v - v = 0
C - If F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
With (∂ F/∂ m) = a
And (∂ F/∂ a) = m; d (∂ F/∂ a)/d t = m'; d² (∂ F/∂ a)/d t² = d m'/ d t = m''
And (∂ F/∂ m') = 2 v; d (∂ F/∂ m')/d t = 2 a
And (∂ F/∂ v) = 2 m'; d (∂ F/∂ v)/d t = 2 m''
And (∂ F/∂ m'') = r; d (∂ F/∂ m'')/d t = v; d² (∂ F/∂ m'')/d t² = d r/ d t = a
And (∂ F/∂ r) = m''
Then d² (∂ F/∂ a)/d t² - d (∂ F/∂ v)/d t + (∂ F/∂ r) = m'' - 2m'' + m'' = 0

Then d² (∂ F/∂ m'')/d t² - d (∂ F/∂ m')/d t + (∂ F/∂ m) = a - 2 a + a = 0
D - Δ T = T (2) - T (1) = (1, 2) ∫F. d S = (1, 2) (P. P)/2

= (1, 2) [p² (x) + p² (y) + p² (z)]/2 m
Δ U = U (1) - U (2) = (2, 1) ∫F. d S = (2, 1) (P. P)/2
= (2, 1) [p² (x) + p² (y) + p² (z)]/2 m
T (2) - T (1) = U (1) - U (2)
T (1) + U (1) = T (2) + U (2) = E = T + U = constant
E - T = [p² (x) + p² (y) + p² (z)]/2 m

T = [(m x' + m' x) ² + [(m y' + m' y) ² + [(m z' + m' z) ²]/2 m
(∂ T/∂ x') = 2 m (m x' + m' x)/ 2 m = (m x' + m' x) = p (x)

And d (∂ T/∂ x')/d t = d [p (x)]/d t = F (x)
(∂ T/∂ x) = 2 m' (m x' + m' x)/ 2 m = (m x' + m' x) (m'/m) = [p (x)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ T/∂ x')/d t - (∂ T/∂ x) = F (x) - [p (x)] (m'/m)
(∂ T/∂ y') = 2 m (m y' + m' y)/ 2 m = (m y' + m' y) = p (y)

And d (∂ T/∂ y')/d t = d [p (y)]/d t = F (y)
(∂ T/∂ y) = 2 m' (m y' + m' y)/ 2 m = (m y' + m' y) (m'/m) = [p (y)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ T/∂ y')/d t - (∂ T/∂ y) = F (y) - [p (y)] (m'/m)
(∂ T/∂ z') = 2 m (m z' + m' z)/ 2 m = (m z' + m' z) = p (z)

And d (∂ T/∂ z')/d t = d [p (z)]/d t = F (z)
(∂ T/∂ z) = 2 m' (m z' + m' z)/ 2 m = (m z' + z' y) (m'/m) = [p (z)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ T/∂ z')/d t - (∂ T/∂ z) = F (z) - [p (z)] (m'/m)
F - U = E - T = E - [p² (x) + p² (y) + p² (z)]/2 m

T = [(m x' + m' x) ² + [(m y' + m' y) ² + [(m z' + m' z) ²]/2 m
(∂ U/∂ x') = - 2 m (m x' + m' x)/ 2 m = - (m x' + m' x) = - p (x)

And d (∂ U/∂ x')/d t = - d [p (x)]/d t = - F (x)
(∂ U/∂ x) = - 2 m' (m x' + m' x)/ 2 m = - (m x' + m' x) (m'/m) = - [p (x)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ U/∂ x')/d t - (∂ U/∂ x) = - F (x) + [p (x)] (m'/m)
(∂ U/∂ y') = - 2 m (m y' + m' y)/ 2 m = - (m y' + m' y) = - p (y)

And d (∂ U/∂ y')/d t = - d [p (y)]/d t = - F (y)
(∂ U/∂ y) = - 2 m' (m y' + m' y)/ 2 m = - (m y' + m' y) (m'/m) = - [p (y)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ U/∂ y')/d t - (∂ U/∂ y) = - F (y) + [p (y)] (m'/m)
(∂ U/∂ z') = - 2 m (m z' + m' z)/ 2 m = - (m z' + m' z) = - p (z)

And d (∂ U/∂ z')/d t = - d [p (z)]/d t = - F (z)
(∂ U/∂ z) = - 2 m' (m z' + m' z)/ 2 m = - (m z' + z' y) (m'/m) = - [p (z)] (m'/m)
And d (∂ U/∂ z')/d t - (∂ U/∂ z) = - F (z) + [p (z)] (m'/m)
41 - Real time two body problem

In Polar coordinates
(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

= H (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] h (θ, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, t)] [r² (θ, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m²(θ, 0) m²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)r²(0,t)][θ'(θ, t)]
= [m²(θ, 0) m²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)r²(0,t)][θ'(θ, 0) θ' (0, t)]

Divide by m²r²θ'
Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]
And θ"/θ' = -2{λ (m) + λ (r) + ỉ [ω (m) + ω (r)]}
Then (m'/m) = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]

Or d m/m d t = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]
Then m = m (0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t
m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t
And m = m (θ, 0) m (0, t) = m (θ, 0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t; Exp = Exponential
And m (0, t) = Exp [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] t
Also, r = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ (r) + ì ω (r)] t
With r (0, t) = Exp [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then θ'(θ, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m²(θ,0) r(θ,0)]}Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ì [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}} -----I

And θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0)]} Exp {-2{[λ (m) + λ (r)] t + ì [ω (m) + ω (r)] t}} --------------------I
And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t)
And θ' (0, t) = Exp {-2{[λ (m) + λ(r)] t + ì [ω (m) + ω(r)] t}
Also θ'(θ, 0) = H (0, 0)/ m² (θ, 0) r² (θ, 0)
And θ'(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (0, 0) r (0, 0)]}

Let m r =1/u

[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) M/ H²
t = 0; m³ (0, 0) = 1

= [h²/Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ (1 + ε cosine θ)

Then r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)
c=εa
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] {Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)] t} ---------------------------------- II
Then r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] Exp i ω (r) t
And m = m (θ, 0) Exp [i ω (m) t] = m (θ, 0) Exp ỉ ω (m) t

= 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²
= 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
Then θ'(0, t) = {2π [√ (1-ε²)]/ T (1-ε) ²} Exp {-2[ω (m) + ω (r)] t

And θ'(0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1- 2sin² [ω (m) + ω (r)] t}




= -2θ'(0, 0) sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]
= -2[2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v° v*/c²]} degrees/100 years
Approximations I

degrees/100 years
Approximations II
In Time seconds
42 - The Eleven binary stars systems that no one ever solved or knew how to solve
1- Camelopardalis
2 - AI Hya
3- CM Draconis
4- DI Herculis
5 - V1143 Cygni
6- V541 Cygni
7- Alpha-Borealis
8 - 731 Cepheid
9 - NV Canis Majoris
10 - CW Canis Majoris
11- GG Orion
43 -
Apsidal motion
DI Herculis Apsidal motion solution
With m = 5.15 M (0) and M = 4.52 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 43.2 R (0)
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Or, θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 (9.67) x 2 x 1030]/ (43.2 x 0.696x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/10.55)
And θ' = 1.36°/ century
And U = [θ' /100] x 360 = 26338 years
As Camelopardalis Apsidal motion solution
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Or, θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 (5.8) x 2 x 1030]/ (15.16 x 0.696x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/3.431)
And U = [θ' /100] x 360 = 2300 years
Real time and real time location explains all of Modern Physics as Newton's equation and
real time delays or visual illusions. Furthermore, it explains quantum as time delays visual
deviations and relativistic as the difference between real time motions or time delayed
motion and absolute time motion or actual motion
Newton's equations are:

From these two equations I am going to prove: There are no Physicists after me, only idiots.
Or prove that all ten claims that Cal - Tech Dr Richard claims about Newton's work and his ingenuity
are all false and wrong and he knew about it because I sent him a copy in 1980.
1- Wave nature of light

2- Space - time
3- Time dilations
8 - Maxwell equations or
9 - Atomic Bond like
10 - Atomic spectrum
11 - Binary stars motion that said "NO" to Einstein and all 350,000 physicists and for history
The 11 Binary stars systems that conquered Einstein
1- As Cameloppardalis
2- DI Herculis
3 - V 1143 Cygni
4 - V 541 Cygni
5 - AI Hydra
6 - Alpha Coronae Borealis
7 - V 731 Cephei
8 - SW Canis Majoris
9 - NV Canis Majoris
10 - GG Orion
11- CM Draconis
1 - The wave Nature of Light

Abstract: The elimination of relativity theory and annexation of quantum mechanics to
classical mechanics is a matter of time and not a matter of science. The problem in all of
physics is wrong experimental data and measurements. Correcting data and measurements
mistakes of past 350 years will cure physics from 20th century wrong physics. 20th century
wrong physics started with Newton and exploded with Einstein's relativity theory. Taking all
of relativity theory experimental proofs and proves that it amounts to nothing and a case of
109 years of Nobel Prize winner physicists and 400 Years of Astronomy that can not read a
telescope is the purpose of this article because it shows not only Einstein was wrong but all
physicists are wrong for past 350 years. Physicists built 350 years of physics on wrong
concepts and relativity changed physics to fiction. Physics progress requires the death of
relativity theory and 100,000 living physicists relativistic education attached to it. In this
article I will show that real time physics is correcting Newton's - Kepler's equations and
annexing quantum mechanics and deleting relativity and strings theories. I will show that
Newton's and Kepler's equations were/are solved wrong for 350 years and the correct
solution fit experimental data better than anything said or published in the history of physics.
All relativity theory experimental is apparent visual effects and the proofs are below and I
challenge all to prove me wrong.
This article is "Relativity Theory Death Certificate"
Proof:
Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not measure
something that did not happen. We can only measure things that had
happened. What we measure in not what happened. We measure in
present time an event that happened in past time.
Present time = past time + real time delays
What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic effects
Observer time = observed time + time delays
Abstract: This is the solution to the problem of planetary system motion around their motion
sun and the solution to the 350 years advance of perihelion/apsidal motion puzzle. This is
the proof that the motion of planets around their mother sun is an ellipse and a real time
"apparent" visual effect advance of perihelion/ apsidal motion.
Real time solution is:
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮
[λ + ỉ ω (m)] t
Real time mass m = m (θ, 0) ℮ (m)
"Apparent advance of perihelion"
Proof:
With (2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

= H (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r² (0, 0) θ' (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ' (θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] h (θ, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, t)] [r² (θ, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, 0) m² (0, t)] [r² (θ, 0) r² (0, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, 0) m² (0, t)] [r² (θ, 0) r² (0, t)] [θ'(θ, 0) θ' (0, t)]

Divide by m²r²θ'
Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]
And θ"/θ' = -2{λ (m) + λ (r) + ỉ [ω (m) + ω (r)]}
Then (m'/m) = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]

Or d m/m d t = [λ (m) + ì ω (m)]
[λ + ỉ ω (m)] t
Then m = m (0) ℮ (m)
[λ +ỉω ]t
And m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) = ℮ (m) (m)
[λ + ỉ ω (m)] t
And m = m (θ, 0) m (0, t) = m (θ, 0) ℮ (m)
And m (0, t) = Exp [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] t
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Also, r = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) ℮ (r)
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With r (0, t) = ℮
Then θ'(θ, t) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (θ, 0) r (θ, 0)]} ℮ -2{[λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] + [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]} t
-2{[λ +ỉω ] + [λ +ỉω ]} t
And θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0)] ℮ (m) (m) (m) (m)
And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t)

-2{[λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] + [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]} t
And θ' (0, t) = ℮
Also θ'(θ, 0) = H (θ, 0)/ m² (θ, 0) r² (θ, 0)
And θ'(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m² (0, 0) r (0, 0)]}
Let m r =1/u

[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³ (θ, 0) m³ (0, t) M/ H²
t = 0; m³ (0, 0) = 1
= [h²/Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ (1 + ε cosine θ)

c=εa
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
Here it is Newton's equations are a wave equation and what Dr Feynman and all others
that did not stop Dr Feynman insults did not see or wanted to see is not Newton's fault
but a culture of Mafia physics departments that will say anything for a Nobel prize
because a Nobel prize is a 500 millions each industry and equation I is a wave equation
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
like S = r ℮ (r) ; r = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)]
2- Space - time
Abstract: The problem in all of physics is measurements or signals time delays effects.
What we see is not what happened. We can not see something that had not happened. We can
only see something that had happened. We see something in present time that happened in
past time. In other words we can only see something in real time an event that happened in
event time. The difference between what we see and what happened amounts to
measurements visual or signal delays effects due to time delays differences between real
(present) and event time (past). Distance measurement using signals introduces time delays.
Meaning that Newton's -Kepler's equations are solved in event time and they need be solved
in real time and if solved in real time relativity and quantum mechanics are no longer needed
because the new solution annex quantum mechanics to classical mechanics and deletes
relativity theory in its entirety.
Present time = past time + time delays
Real time = event time + time delays
What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured.
Real time solution = Newton's classical event time solution + time delays
What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays
What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic effects
An object of length r could be seen longer or shorter if it extended or shortened Exp (λ t) or
twisted Exp (í ω t) making it in general r Exp [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not
extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect.
Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r Exp í ω t
If actual motion is r then time Visual motion is S where S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] caused by light
aberrations visual effects as follows:
Exp [ỉ ω t] = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]; From S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] we can show that
It changes to: S = r [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
= r {√ [1- sine² ω t]} + ỉ sine ω t
=Sx+ỉSy
Light aberration: ω t = arc tan (v/c)
Where S x = r √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = sine arc tan (v/c); ω t = arc tan (v/c)
With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement:
S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]
S x = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]
This is the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent" and not real except on
Campus.
Here it is Newton's equations answers length contraction
3- Time dilations
Abstract: Looting DOE is a common place because corporate Mafia academia will say
anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and no
physics and because politician are corporate corrupt and shallow science educated politicians
and will give a bucket of money for a bucket full of nothing because money is not coming
out from their pockets and they are paying nothing and nothing is dark energy. To prove dark
energy exists for a scientifically ignorant government and looting scientists, scientists took a
bucket with a phototube registering flashes between two elevations. The difference in count
is taken as proof of the existence of elementary nuclear particles and dark energy. I Joe
Nahhas have had accused western scientists of fraud since July 4th, 1973 and this article is
part of the proof that at least 88.88 % of western physicists published work is fraud and fraud
is dark energy.
Want to see how E = mc² trick? It is shown below but for now read this
happened. What we measure is not what happened. We measure in
Observer time = observed traveller time + time delays
T = t + [T- t]
T=T
T = t [T/t]
ỉθ
T/t = e ; θ = arc tan (v/c) this is the magic sock equation for looting
ỉθ
Δ Γ = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine² (θ/2)
With (v/c) = 1/n = 1/1.0003 = n = index of refraction of air
Δ Γ = - 2 t sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]}
Δ Γ/t = - 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]}
Δ Γ/t = - 0.292787177
Δ Γ/t = - 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e
- 2 sine² {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}
N = N (0) e
Δ Γ/t = - 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
= - 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
Time dilations tricks are scatter decay experiments. I taught in colleges for few years and I
can explain it and it is called Scatter decay and not time dilations.
In an MIT 1962 video that is sold and distributed around the world two gentlemen had a bucket
with a photo sensor inside it registering flashes between two elevations at a mountain top and
at sea level
The vertical showers of μ - Meson were counted through a horizontal counter:

On a mountain top of 2 km height ....... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour
This count is given as experimental proof of the existence of μ - Mesons and time dilations.
- 0.292787177
N = N (0) e
- 0.292787177
N = 564 e = 420.8640
Is this time dilation?

Absolutely not!
Another way of doing this is
2000 meters height * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1500 meters height * *** * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * ****
1500 meters height * *** ** * *** * *** * ** * *** * ** * ** * *** * ** * *
1000 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** *** ** * ***
0500 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** ***
- 0.292787177
N = 564 e = 420.8640
This is an excellent result because when measurements were done lots of factors are
involved that determines n
Another way of doing this is taking n = d = density of air
The average density in this experiment is at 1 km level which is about 1.07 kg/m³
I say this is not time dilations but diffraction due to an increase of air density between the two
different locations and here is the proof
-ỉωt
The diffraction intensity N = N (0) e
-ỉωt
N = N (0) e ; ω t = arc tan (1/ n); n v = c; n = index of refraction; v = velocity of light in
medium; c = light speed in vacuum
N = N (0) [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t] = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2) + ỉ sine ω t] = T (x) + ỉ T (y)
N (x) = N (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2)] = T (0) {1 - 2sine² {[(arc tan (1/n)]/2}}
Δ N = N (x) - N (0) = - 2 N (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
Δ N = - 2 N (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan [1 /n)]
N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan [1/ 1.07] = 412
Average air density at 1 km altitude is about d = 1.07kg/ m³ estimated from engineering charts.
Diffraction count is N = N (0) cosine arc tan (1/d)
The μ - Meson count
On a mountain top of 2 km ................... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour
Average distance is 1 km and average density is 1.07kg/ m³
N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan [1/ 1.07]
= 564 cosine arc tan (1/1.07)
= 412
This fictitious method of proving the μ - Mesons was continued to give the μ - Meson a life
time. To give this science fiction elementary particles
A - Mathematical tricks
Making a square operation a double is simple
In algebra one there is real numbers and there is imaginary numbers like 1 and ỉ where the √
ỉ² = -1 (look at the imaginary number or complex number ỉ in you algebra one) the trick is
using the absolute value of │ (1 + ỉ) (1 + ỉ) │= 2
The difference between 1 and ỉ is a 90 degrees twist of 1 on the x-axis to become ỉ on the y-
axis. The justification to making 1 as (1 + ỉ) came from Michelson and Morley experiment
that said if you rotate 90 degrees then there is no difference if you were at rest
This trick is found in all experimental proofs of dark energy research when it is not only
wrong but an organized wrong.
For example let us make and E = mc² out of E = mc²/2
By writing instead of 1c we write (1 + ỉ) c
If we start with E = mc²/2 same as E = (m/2) [(1c) (1c)]; now change 1c to │ (1 + ỉ) │
You get in absolute value E = (m/2) │(1 + ỉ) c ││ (1 + ỉ) c │= (m/2) (2c²) = mc²
This trick is actually changing a multiplication operation into a doubling operation. In actual
practice it is like this
B - Real time location tricks
[λ (r)] t
An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a decay factor of ℮ and
[ỉ ω (r)] t [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
a motion factor of ℮ is introduced to a total factor of ℮ and the location
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
of an object measured in real time is r = r (0) ℮
With m = constant
C - The trick of 20th century E = mc²/2
E = mc²/2 and
E = mc² is the visual illusion of E =mc²/2
Visual E = mc ²
Proof: E (total) = T (kinetic) + U (potential) = T + [U = 0] = [T = 0] + U
With E = T = mv²/2 = mc²/2; v = c
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With r = r (0) ℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
P = {[v (0) + r (0) [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮
ỉ ω (r) t
With λ (r) = 0, P = [v (0) + ỉ ω (r) r (0)] ℮
2ỉω t
(P. P) = [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮ (r)
Energy by definition:
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = m (P. P)/2 = (m/2) [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [c² - c² + 2 ỉ c²] ℮
With ω r (0) = c
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [2 ỉ c² ℮ ]
2 ỉ ω (r) t
│E│ = (m/2) │2 ỉ c² ││℮ │
E = (m/2) (2 c²) = mc²
E = mc²
In experiments we can only find 1/9 of the energy that the formulas say there is energy.
Scientists are wasting their efforts for all of past century on trying to find the other 8/9
energy the formulas says they exist but we can not find.
How did that happen?
We have E = [mc²/2] and in nuclear reaction they say when mass is changed to energy then
change in energy Δ E = mc² and total energy is = E + Δ E = mc²/2 + mc² = 3mc²/2 and in
experiment we can only find E = mc²/2 and the other 2 [mc²/2] = 2E are missing.
With E (total) = 3 (mc²/2) = 3 E = E (total)/3 can be found and 2E =2 E (total)/3
Or E (total)/3 found
And 2 E (total)/ 3 missing
Then scientists added that also (1/3) of energy that we found might have 2/3 missing too.
Then 2/3 (1/3) = 2/9 missing of energy that we found
And 2/3 = 6/9 already missing and the total missing is 6/9 + 2/9 = 8/9 missing wow!
Wow! Let us find 8/9 missing energy and get rich and for a century western scientists are day dreaming of 8/9
dark energy missing and the rest of the world have to put up with this crap for 150 years of silly relativity! And
dumber quantum confusions of physics

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
ỉω t
Then r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r)
ỉω ]t
And m = m (θ, 0) ℮ (m)
= 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²
= 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
-2 ỉ [ω ω ]t
Then θ'(0, t) = {2π [√ (1-ε²)]/ T (1-ε) ²} ℮ (r) + (m)
And θ'(0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1- 2sin² [ω (m) + ω (r)] t}




= -2θ'(0, 0) sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]
= -2[2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t]

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v° v*/c²]} degrees/100 years ---------- II
Approximations I

degrees/100 years
Approximations II
In Time seconds
31- The 11 binary stars systems that no one ever solved or knew how to solve including
Einstein and all 100,000 Physicists all solved by this formula
This real time physics solution can be applied to any two body system including binary stars
systems. Binary stars apsidal motion or "Apparent" rate of orbital axial rotation is visual
effects along the line of sight of moving objects applied to the angular velocity at Apses.
From the thousands of close binary stars astronomers picked a dozen sets of binary stars
systems that would be a good test of relativity theory and collected data for all past century
and relativity theory failed every one of them. This rate of "apparent" axial rotation is given
by this new equation
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
From Newton's laws for a circular orbit: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r²; r (cm) = [M/m + M] r
Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r
And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)]
And v* = v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 48.14 km [Mercury] = v*(p)

And v* (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = v* (s)
1- Planet Mercury 43" seconds of arc per century elliptical orbit axial rotation rate
[No spin factor]; data supplied does not include spin factor
W (obo) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² seconds of arc per century
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar system
G =6.673x10^-11; M=2x10^30kg; m=.32x10^24kg

ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec
Calculations yields:
v =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552
W (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)²=43.0”/century

This is the solution to Mercury's 43" seconds of arc per century without space-time fictional
forces or space-time fiction
2- Venus Advance of perihelion solution:
W" (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² seconds/100 years
Data: T=244.7days v°= v° (p)] = 6.52km/sec; ε = 0.0.0068; v*(p) = 35.12

Calculations
1-ε = 0.0068; (1-ε²/4) = 0.99993; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.00761
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R = 108.2x10^9m
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 41.64 km/sec

Advance of perihelion of Venus motion is given by this formula:
W" (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² seconds/100 years
W" (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 41.64/300,000]
= (-720x36526x3600/224.7) (1.00762) (41.64/300,000)²
W" (observed) = 8.2"/100 years; observed 8.4"/100years
This is an excellent result within the scientific errors
These are the rules and situations encountered in binary stars
Looking from top or bottom at two stars they either approach each other coming from the top
(↑) or from the bottom (↓)
Knowing this we can construct a table and see how these two stars are formed. There are
many combinations of velocity additions and subtractions and one combination will give the
right answer.
Advance of perihelion/ Apsidal motion table:
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples
Is not just about deleting relativity but also deleting 110 years of Nobel Prize winner
stupidity and fraud that promotes silly work of time travel of Albert Einstein.
The replacement to all four Mechanics classical quantum relativistic and strings is a
real time universal mechanics explained below and I dare all to prove me wrong
The origin of relativity theory stupidity comes from Earth Orbit light aberration.
Orbit light aberrations can be found like this
Γ = t (Γ/t)
Γ= t e ỉ θ; Γ/ t = e ỉ θ; θ = arc tan (v/c); Γ= t e ỉ θ
Γ (x) = t cosine θ = t [1 - 2 sine ² arc tan (v/c)]
Δ Γ = Γ (x) - t = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (v/c)
Δ Γ = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v - v*)/c] sec/

century
sec/century
sec/century
sec/century
better

Venus
sec
35.1/300,000)
Earth
29.8/300,000)
The apparent apsidal motion and advance of perihelion is a
calculation mistake done long time ago by a French Mathematician
and they are given: θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Apsidal motion
DI Herculis Apsidal motion solution
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Or, θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 (9.67) x 2 x 1030]/ (43.2 x 0.696x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/10.55)
And U = [θ' /100] x 360 = 26338 years
As Camelopardalis Apsidal motion solution
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
Or, θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 (5.8) x 2 x 1030]/ (15.16 x 0.696x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/3.431)
And U = [θ' /100] x 360 = 2300 years
Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
Then θ' = {√ [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)³]} (180/π) (36526/88) (3600)
Abstarct: The Newton's - Kepler's equation can explain all planetary motion correctly and it
can explain the slow precessional motion as a visual effect that came out as a result of
miscalculation by Le Verrier
Actual value is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
Used value: θ' = v/r = v (m)/r
Missing Value θ' = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
And v* - v ° = 29.335km/sec
With Areal r²θ' = h = r v; θ' = v/r Kepler's law
Or Angular Velocity θ' = v/r from my 5th grade book Arithmetic book
The 400 years Mistake is measurements of θ' = v/r
If we are measuring this angular velocity from Earth for Mars then:
Astronomers use:
This, θ' = v/r = v (m)/r = velocity of Mercury / Distance of Mercury from the Sun
But the Actual value is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r
The Missing Value θ'(e) = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r is the mistake
And θ'(e) = [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r radians/second
For Mercury
And v* - v ° = 29.335km/sec
And r (Mercury) = (58.2 x 106 km)
And r = Mercury's (planet) mean distance
And θ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km) radians/second
= [(29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km)] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/88)] arc sec /century
For Venus: θ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)
= [(29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/224.7)]
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v (M) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
= √ [G (m + M)/ a]
And θ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r
Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)
GPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period; ε = 0
And v° = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed;
And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/second
Then v* +/- v° = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second

We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are opposite
GPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc
W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° +/- v*)/c] ² seconds/day
W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] ² seconds of arc /1 day
W" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by
24hours/360degress = 15
U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/day
U = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day
Can it get any better?
Conclusion: GPS satellites turn around Earth with a speed of 14000km/hr and Earth Spin is
465 meters per second. If Earth Spin and Satellite Orbit are taken into account the 45micro
seconds time delays per day is given by Universal Mechanics without the magic sock ideas
of Harvard MIT Cal-Tech and NASA of space-time confusions of physics and without the
addition of fictional forces or academic fiction of four dimensional self inflected maze of
Modern Physics where Physicists can be sent to work at Macdonald's with any loss to the
subject of Physics

Gravitation equation or Newton's equation explains space-time dents better



We Have r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
Proof:
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)



γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = v = 0
[λ +ỉω ]t
With m = m (0) ℮ (m) (m)
; see above
Then F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r = m" r
= [λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)] ² m r; λ (m) = 0
Then F = - ω ² (m) m r = [- G m M/r³] r
Or all rotational motion of Earth Explains gravity or space-time dent and if we put a test
particle or light then,
We have: ω² = G m/r³ or, ω = √ [Gm/r³]
And ω= (1/r) √ [Gm/r] = v (test)/r
And v (test) = √ [Gm/r]
With ω = 1/T = 1/ [T (0) + ΔΓ]
And G = 1/p (0) T² = 1/p (0) T² (0) [1 + ΔΓ] ²
With Δ Γ = 2 sine ² arc tan (1/n); n = index of refraction of air = 1.00029
And ΔΓ = 0.292
And p (0) = 1.2077 kg/m³
G = 1/p (0) T² (0) [1 + ΔΓ] ² = 1/ 1.2077 x 23.9345² x 3600²[1 + 0.292]²
G = 6.674 x 10 -11
The gravitational constant is not a constant and it is only measured on earth

Gravity is a rotational trap and when measured through a test particle of light it does not
mean everything is going to act the same
Around objects there is no space time dent and this space time dent would not happen
except around planets that are rotating and the failure of Gravity probe is a proof of it.
This dent is expressed as Newton's equation G mM/r²
The 1/5 amplitude Feynman keep talking about is
Δ Γ = 2 sine ² arc tan (1/n); n = index of refraction of water = 4/3
Δ Γ = 2 sine ² arc tan (3/4) = 0.2
20th Century Physics Greatest Mistake is E = mc²

By Professor Joe Nahhas 1977; joenahhas1958@yahoo.com
I am the founder of real time Physics. It is not only Einstein is wrong but all physicists
are wrong for past 400 years. It is time for change; regime change.
Abstract: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of science.
E = mc² death certificate is now available
Real time Universe
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product.
Real time location

[λ ] t
An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a decay factor of ℮ (r) and
[ỉ ω (r)] t [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With m = constant
E = mc²/2 and
Visual E = mc ²

With E = T = mv²/2 = mc²/2; v = c
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With r = r (0) ℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
P = {[v (0) + r (0) [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮
ỉ ω (r) t
With λ (r) = 0, P = [v (0) + ỉ ω (r) r (0)] ℮
2 ỉ ω (r) t
(P. P) = [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = m (P. P)/2 = (m/2) [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [c² - c² + 2 ỉ c²] ℮
With ω r (0) = c
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [2 ỉ c² ℮ ]
2 ỉ ω (r) t
│E│ = (m/2) │2 ỉ c² ││℮ │
E = (m/2) (2 c²) = mc²
E = mc²
The Visual effects of 19th century experiments and the maze of light that lightened the 20
century world that was in the dark at night since eternity and made fools out of some are not
good enough to make a fool of me believing in the dead minds of E = mc². Lucid Joe
Chadwick under investigation for 1932 Neutron mistake
The mathematical proof of the non existence of the neutron
By Professor Joe Nahhas 1979
joenahhas1958@gmail.com
My name is Joe Nahhas founder of real time physics

July 4th, 1973
I am the founder of real time Physics. It is not only Einstein is wrong but all physicists
are wrong for past 400 years. It is time for change; a regime change. This regime
change is coming to a college near you and it is the replacement to all of Modern
physics and is called "Real time Universal Mechanics"
Abstract: Charge is lost like in pair annihilations and gained like in 1932 Chadwick's
Neutron discovery experiment as if charge is a hat we can wear or hang it for a while. This
sort of loss or gain of a property based on motion can not be a physical property but more
like motion geometry. In this paper I discuss James Chadwick experiment and will show that
the neutron is the same as the proton. Meaning the neutron and the proton are the same
particle with the same mass.
I taught in colleges for few years and I can explain it and it is called Scatter. If you been in a
nuclear lab you have these samples of radioactive material bombarding a Geiger counter. Not
every one hit on the Geiger count one hit. Geiger counter has no means of telling if he got hit
once or twice in a single spot. Radioactivity is not a clock timed emission but a sporadic
behavior. The difference between the total mass and the counted mass is the scattered mass
divided by the number of the Geiger count give average lost mass per proton when added to
the proton mass it was claimed as the neutron mass
Numerical example: What you have is like this: Assume you have 100 protons each ways 2
grams and total mass is 200. But you did not know that. You only know that you have 200
grams of radioactive material and used the Geiger counter because unless you count it you
will never know how much protons you had. At the beginning you can only know the total
mass you lose five protons and you counted 95 protons two grams each and a loss of 10
grams.
You are saying
I had 200 grams now I have a count of 95 protons two grams each
Then an energy loss of ten grams had happened
10 divided by 95 = 0.105 grams per proton mass loss
So each proton is 2 grams and a loss of energy of 0.105
Then there must be a Neutron that ways 2.105
Proof: Proof: An Alpha α bombarded Beryllium Be.

Or α ------------------------> Be ---------------------> N (0) m (p)
These particles go through diffraction and then through Paraffin which is a Wax with high
thermo absorption that suck these high speed particles and becomes very dark carbon.
N (0) m (p) suffered scatter and approximated as decay
And the new number of protons is:
N m (p) = N (0) m (p) Exp (- λ t) decay to count the new number
N m (p) = N (0) m (p) Exp [1 - λ t]

= N (0) m (p) - N (0) m (p) λ t
N = N (0) - N (0) λ t = N (0) - d N
Or N (0) = N + d N; d N = - N (0) t/ T; T is the life time of the radioactive sample.
So, N = N (0) - N (0) t/ T = N (0) [1 - t/T] the number of particles changed

Or we lose N (0) /T particles every t/T seconds
What Chadwick did or his mistake is:
N / N (0) = [1 - t/T]
No Loss of particles but loss of mass in each particle m (0) t/ T in T time
This mass of particle is m (0) = Proposed Neutron and m = m (p)
Instead of using N / N (0) = [1 - t/T]

Chadwick used m (p) = m (0) [1 - t/T]
And m (0) = m (p) / [1 - t/T]
With t/T = 1/ 726.2390 seconds or little over 1/12 minutes 1979 data
And m (p) = 1836.12 m (e)
And said there must be a Neutron

Or mass of Neutron m (n) = m (p) / [1 - t/T] = 1838.6511 m (e)
Conclusion: Average decay per proton m (p)/ T = 2.528258604 m (e) lost mass due to decay.
When added to m (p) that is m (p) + m (p)/T ≠ m (n) = 1838.6511 m (e)
And ∑1838.65 m (e) =∑ 1836.12 m (e) + ∑ 2.53 m (e)
Initial number of protons = Geiger counted protons + scattered protons
The assumption that there is a Neutron inside the nucleus is not only wrong but silly to say
the least.
Special Relativity Theory is Wrong

By Professor Joe Nahhas
I am the founder of real time physics July 4th, 1973

Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics
The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of science.
Solving classical mechanics in real time led to annexing of quantum mechanics to
classical mechanics and deleting relativity without loss of subject.
Abstract: Special relativity theory is erroneous in its entirety because it is based on the
Illusion of length contraction and no one believe that two particles going in opposite
directions at light speed c then their relative velocity is c because it is proven experimentally
otherwise in pair annihilations. Accepting length contraction as real and erroneously
concluding the constant velocity of light as stated in special relativity theory then all of
special relativity theory can be derived from these two erroneous principles leading to 20th
century all erroneous space-time confusions of physics. It is not only that special relativity
theory is wrong but all of physics is wrong for past 400 years.
Introduction: The problem in all of physics is measurements or signals time delays effects.
What we see is not what happened. We can not see something that had not happened. We can
only see something that had happened. We see something in present time that happened in
past time. In other words we can only see something in real time an event that happened in
event time. The difference between what we see and what happened amounts to
measurements visual or signal delays effects due to time delays differences between real
(present) and event time (past). Distance measurement using signals introduces time delays.
Meaning that Newton's -Kepler's equations are solved in event time and they need be solved
in real time and if solved in real time relativity and quantum mechanics are no longer needed
because the new solution annex quantum mechanics to classical mechanics and deletes
relativity theory in its entirety.
Present time = past time + time delays
Real time = event time + time delays
What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured.
Real time solution = Newton's classical event time solution + time delays
What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays
What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic effects
Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics

An object of length r could be seen longer or shorter if it extended or shortened Exp (λ t) or
twisted Exp (í ω t) making it in general r Exp [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not
extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect.
Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r Exp í ω t
1- The illusion of length contraction:

Length contraction is just a visual effect of projected light aberration and it is an
"apparent" visual effect and not real
An object located at r ---------- light sensing ----------------- measured as S = r exp [ỉ ω t]

With ω t = arc tan (v/c); tan (v/c) = light aberrations angle = ω t
S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] caused by light aberrations visual effects as follows:
Exp [ỉ ω t] = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]; From S = r Exp [ỉ ω t]

It changes to: S = r {√ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] - ỉ sine arc tan (v/c)}
= r {√ [1- (v/c) ²] - ỉ (v/c)}; v/c <<< 1
=Sx+ỉSy
Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement: S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] ≈ r √ [1-(v/c) ²]; v/c << 1
This the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent and not real
2 - Constant velocity of light leading to Time Dilations

Projected light aberrations
Sx = r cosine ω t
Hypotenuse = S x = [c t x] = c t x √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]
S x ≈ c t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; from constant velocity of light
And c is constant in all reference frames
Where t = local self time; t x = time by observer
t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; and

t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math
These are time dilatation equations given by Einstein’s special relativity theory.
t x' = t' √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; and

t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math
Two observers observing the same thing the time dilations are
Then, t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math; Lab purposes
And, t x' = t √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math; Lab purposes
However; two observers looking at each other

S (A) = r exp [ỉ ω t]
S (B) = r exp [- ỉ ω t]
S x (A) = S x = c t x ≈ c t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²]
S x (B) = S x = c t x' ≈ c t x √ [1-(v/c) ²]
And t x ≈ t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²]

And t x' ≈ t x √ [1-(v/c) ²]
That is why there no twin Paradox except on science fictions books because it is all about
aberrations and nothing real.
3 – Momentum
S x = Visual location along the line of sight = r [√ [1-(v/c) ²]

P x = v [√ [1-(v/c) ²]; v =constant; P x = d [S x]/d t
And m P x = m v [√ [1-(v/c) ²] = m (0) v
4 – Mass Then m = m (0) / [√ [1-(v/c) ²]
Also; m = m (0) / [1-1/2(v/c) ²]
5- Energy
mc² = m (0) c² / [1-1/2(v/c) ²]
E = m (0) c²; v = 0
Also m ≈ m (0) [1+ 1/2(v/c) ²]
Hence m c² ≈ m (0) c² + m v ²/2
I am not only saying Lorentz Einstein and the 100,000 dead physicists and the 100,000 living
physicists are wrong I am adding that the collective value of relativity theory special and
general and all of more than three dimensions based physics is 1/2 rotten onion stinking
onion.
DOE looting using Dark energy Neutrino tricks
By Professor Joe Nahhas 1980
My name is Joe Nahhas and I am the founder of real time Physics July 4th, 1973.
Abstract: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of science.
E = mc² energy research means cash for physicists and that mean saying anything publishing
anything based on nothing as long as it takes and as long rigging is required to fit energy
fraud favorite symbol E = mc² and it did not matter if physicists practiced fraud to their teeth
because big physics institutions with big physics departments is a business and not
necessarily science or scientific with profit-loss management. In this article I Joe Nahhas will
expose how mathematically and experimentally fraud is done promoted and executed to cater
for a scientifically ignorant and morally bankrupt scientific community and governments. By
definition E = mc²/2 that exists in nature.
1- Dark energy scam barrels first virtual existence was that physicists took energy value of E
= mc²/2 and make it E = mc²; Einstein 1905 Energy was doubled and 1/2 missing.
2- Dark energy scam barrels second virtual jump was that physicists can experimentally can
find only mc²/3; Ellis woods 1921; with energy E = mc²/2 and energy visual effect of Δ E =
mc² = 2 [mc²/2] now we have E = 1 [mc²/2]; Δ E = 2 [mc²/2]; E + Δ E = 3 [mc²/2] and energy
was tripled and dark energy became 2/3 of all energy and it is missing.
3 - No limit to academic fraud and if Billy Bob did not do it Billy Bob Junior did it. The new
off springs said 2/3 of energy is dark and the 1/3 real energy is dark energy so 2/3 of 1/3 is
equal to 2/9 and [2/9 + 1/3] = 8/9 missing dark energy. In other words there is about 8/9 of all
the energy of the universe or 88.88 % of the energy in the universe up for grabs and if the
physicists are paid more money they can find more about this Atlantis of energy. Call the
troops and join the search for the 88.88 % missing dark energy. Uncle Sam is shelling
research money for anyone ugly or not crook or not fraud or not who can promise a good
promise or not to find the missing 88.88 % of energy that we desperately need and God bless
America!
Introduction: The Neutrino that makes up the dark energy that is theoretically predicted and
experimentally found is there but unfortunately dark energy is not here yet! This one single
experiment claim of "yes" Neutrino is found is the standard in scientific fraud because it is
bogus and it won a Nobel Prize on top of that and in this article I Joe Nahhas will show how
this experiment is a textbook fraud experiment. Why it is a textbook fraud? Because that's
what saved E = mc² and without E = mc² physicists are out of luck scamming. In this article I
will deal with the Neutrino case. It is an essential fraud stop in the history of science. It is the
one experiment that gave a "Yes" to fraud from 50 % to 88.88 %. E = mc²/2 by Newton 350
years ago can explain nuclear fission and fusion and the visual effect of E = mc²/2 is 20th
century energy fraud symbol E = mc². Relativity theory and E = mc² could not hold for long
and what preserved it was a collection of experiments that proved its validity based visual
tricks and not reality physics and the result is dark energy reality that 1/3 of 1/3 or 1/9 of
matter that exists is detectable and 8/9th of energy is not detectable and if scientists receive
big checks then they can find this 8/9 matter energy barrels drugging congress and fooling all
including themselves.
A - Mathematical tricks
Making a square operation a double is simple
In algebra one there is real numbers and there is imaginary numbers like 1 and ỉ where the √
ỉ² = -1 (look at the imaginary number or complex number ỉ in you algebra one) the trick is
using the absolute value of │ (1 + ỉ) (1 + ỉ) │= 2
The difference between 1 and ỉ is a 90 degrees twist of 1 on the x-axis to become ỉ on the y-
axis. The justification to making 1 as (1 + ỉ) came from Michelson and Morley experiment
that said if you rotate 90 degrees then there is no difference if you were at rest
This trick is found in all experimental proofs of dark energy research when it is not only
wrong but an organized wrong.
For example let us make and E = mc² out of E = mc²/2
By writing instead of 1c we write (1 + ỉ) c
If we start with E = mc²/2 same as E = (m/2) [(1c) (1c)]; now change 1c to │ (1 + ỉ) │
You get in absolute value E = (m/2) │(1 + ỉ) c ││ (1 + ỉ) c │= (m/2) (2c²) = mc²
This trick is actually changing a multiplication operation into a doubling operation. In actual
practice it is like this
Real time Universe
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product.
Real time location
[λ (r)] t
An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a decay factor of ℮ and
[ỉ ω (r)] t [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With m = constant
E = mc²/2 and
Visual E = mc ²
With E = T = mv²/2 = mc²/2; v = c
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
With r = r (0) ℮
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
P = {[v (0) + r (0) [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]} ℮
ỉ ω (r) t
With λ (r) = 0, P = [v (0) + ỉ ω (r) r (0)] ℮
2ỉω t
(P. P) = [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮ (r)
Energy by definition:
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = m (P. P)/2 = (m/2) [v² (0) - ω² r² (0) + 2 ỉ ω r (0) v (0)] ℮
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [c² - c² + 2 ỉ c²] ℮
With ω r (0) = c
2 ỉ ω (r) t
E = (m/2) [2 ỉ c² ℮ ]
2 ỉ ω (r) t
│E│ = (m/2) │2 ỉ c² ││℮ │
E = (m/2) (2 c²) = mc²
E = mc²
To cash big checks in 40's 50's and 60's is to associate oneself with the big equation that is E
= mc² and when experiments did not find all the energy this equation says new imaginary
particles were theorized to preserve the 20th century physics number one equation E = mc².
These new theorized particles attracted big crowds and fame and fortune hunters. The
Neutrino came early on and the DOE or USA Department of energy administration was open
to such proposals. What is not clear at all how such a department accept such a ridiculous
finding on such rubbish grounds and how such findings and rubbish claims ended being
Nobel Prized as if physics is a rigged poker game.
Anti-neutrino + proton ---------> neutron + positron
Positron + electron --------------> Gamma + Gamma
Gamma caught by a sensor and amplified to a signal 1 --> signal 1 on Oscilloscope 1
Neutron + Cadmium --> [Cadmium eats neutron] --> coughs Gamma

Gamma caught by a sensor and amplified to a signal 2 --> signal 2 on Oscilloscope 2
Reines and Cowan who claimed that if they install a tank of water close to a nuclear reactor
building and shield it from cosmic radiation then the Neutrino can be found from seeing two
γ- gamma signals.
The first signal γ- gamma signal is an indication of an Antineutrino capture by a neutron and
the second γ- gamma signal is an indication of a neutron capture by cadmium and excited
cadmium spits another γ- gamma signal
A Water Tank with 200 liters of water and 40 CdCl2 or a mixture of tri ethyl benzene
* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *
signal 1 captured 25 μ seconds later signal 2 captures
Signal 1 and two differ by a small size captured on oscilloscope screens
Water has a refractive index of 4/3 and try ethyl benzene has a refractive index of 1.44
There was a time window of 25 micro seconds shots were taken and when a # 1 signal appeared
in this 25 micro-seconds window the second window showed another signal appearing within
0- 5 microseconds
A signal moving inside a medium is expected to get delayed from 0-5 micro seconds in a 0-
25 micro second window
-ỉωt
The diffraction slows the motion inside a medium with refractive index n: T = T (0) e
-ỉωt
T = T (0) e ; ω t = arc tan (1/ n); n v = c; n = index of refraction; v = velocity of light in
medium; c = light speed in vacuum
T = T (0) [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t] = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2) + ỉ sine ω t] = T (x) + ỉ T (y)
T (x) = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2)] = T (0) {1 - 2sine² {[(arc tan (1/n)]/2}}
Δ T = T (x) - T (0) = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
Δ T = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [1 /n)]
T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [3/4] = 0.8 T (0)
T (x) - T (0) = 0.2 T (0)
Δ T = 0.2 T (0)
The assumption that the free neutrino is detected at the Savannah River nuclear power plant
experiment in 1953 and published in nature 1956 by Reines and Cowan and advertised by
United Nations in 1958 is not only wrong but dead wrong. The claim of a second signal
detection delayed 5 micro second after the pair annihilation indicating a neutron capture by
Cadmium and proving the existence of the neutrino to support Wolfgang Pauli Neutrino
theory and relativity theory is not justified. Here is why
Proof: The gate length is T (0) = 25 μ s (microseconds)

The Container that had Cadmium is basically Tri ethyl benzene mixed with water. The
refractive index of water at 25°C is 1.333 ~ 4/3 and the refractive index of tri ethyl benzene
is 1.44 with 5 to 1 ratio water to tri ethyl benzene which is a minor distraction to water
refractive index.
Δ T = - 2 x 25 sine² {[arc tan (~ 3/4)/2]} = 5 μ s time delays

Δ T = 0.2 T (0) = 0.2 x 25 = 5 μ s time delays
The coincidence of Pair annihilation gammas and Neutron capture gammas is not justified
If all the mixture was Tri ethyl benzene because the literature says it is a mixture and it say it
is tri ethyl benzene
Δ T = - 2 x 25 {[sine² arc tan (1/1.44)]/2} = 4.46575 μ s time delays
The delayed signal within the 5 μ s intervals is not a sign of Neutrino capture but a flash of
light caught traveled and caught delayed. Meaning it is the same gamma and not two
different gammas. What Reines and Cowan did is measuring the same signal in a 25 micro
second interval at the start they measured the signal and in that 25 micro seconds interval the
signal had 5 micro seconds signal time delay that was measured as a second event. Reines
and Cowan claimed two signals the first event was the signal of pair annihilation and the
second event is the neutron capture and releasing a second gamma ray when in fact looking
at the same signal. This is the basis of all dark energy fraud
It is not only Einstein is wrong but all physicists are wrong for past 400 years. It is not the
fact that they are wrong by accident but it is the fact they are wrong by organization. I am not
saying the scientific community is all fraud but I am saying that the scientific community is
at least 51 % fraud and fraud comes proportional to the scientific community academic and
social institutional ratings. The higher grade scientific institutions has is an indication of the
more fraud rating can be attached to it. I am not saying that scientists are fraud but I am
saying scientists are at least 85 % fraud and they will say anything publish anything based on
nothing for jobs money prestige and no physics. Maybe I am wrong scientists are 88.88 %
fraud same rate as dark energy. It is time for change; regime change. Politicians
mathematicians journalists philosophers and all others non physicists can not bring down
centuries in physics fraud but physicists with knowledge of subject matter can make that
change not by being politically correct but by bringing down the mountain high house of
stunk.
8 - Maxwell equations
[λ +ỉω ]t
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] ℮ (r) (r)
--------------------------------- I
This equation is the same equation as Maxwell's equation
The real part is the electric part and the imaginary part is magnetism
The only difference between the two is the name! I can prove that and I had proved that
long time ago and I had posted it long time ago
9 - Atomic Bond
Femtochemistry: Atomic-Scale Dynamics of the Chemical

Bond Using Ultrafast Lasers
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1999/zewail-lecture.ram
Einstein is a bully of all time equation is Γ = t ℮ ỉ θ
Einstein is a bully of all time equation can be

applied to Dr Ahmed Zewail silly notion of new
science of femto chemistry. Not only Einstein used
it but 100 years of Nobel Prize winners bullies used
it and why not DR Ahmed Zewail?
Dr Ahmed Zewail claims he can see the break-up of
chemical bonds live?!
This trick was originally used By Reines and
Cowans in the Neutrino experiment. Then it was
called Micro time travel stupidity
Then came the Nano time travel Stupidity
The came the Pico time Travel Stupidity
Now stupidity is at Level femto
Where it came from?

It is called time delays
Real time location
[λ ] t
An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a decay factor of ℮ (r) and
[ỉ ω (r)] t [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
of an object measured in real time is S = r ℮
Real time location along the line of measurement

And perpendicular to the line of measurement
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t [λ ] t ỉω t
S = r ℮ (r) = r ℮ (r) ℮ (r)
[λ ]t
S x + ỉ S y = r ℮ (r) [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
[λ (r)] t
S x= r ℮ cosine ω t
[λ (r)] t
S x= r ℮ √ [1 - sine² ω t]
λ t
S y = r ℮ [ (r)] sine ω t
Taking ω T = arc tan (v/c)
λ t
And S y = r ℮ [ (r)] sine arc tan (v/c)
[λ +ỉω ]t [λ (r)] t
S = r ℮ (r) (r)
=r℮ ℮ ỉ ω (r) t
With λ (r) = 0
Then S = r ℮ [ỉ ω (r)] t
Changing to time delays
S = c Γ; r = c t; ω (r) t = θ
Then the Bullying equation is Γ = t ℮ ỉ θ
Γ = t (Γ/t)
And Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (v/c)
Or finding t
In his Nobel work Dr Zewail used Cyanogenic iodide with λ = 306 nanometer; 1 nanometer
-
= 10 - 9 and watched it fluoresces at λ = 388.9; t = 200 femto seconds; 1 femto second = 10 15
second
He shot a Laser beam to stir a solution that contained crystal of Cyanogenic iodide
Then every 10 femto seconds he shot again to see what happens and after the last shot he
concluded the stir is dead and Cyanogenic iodide broke
ICN ----------------> CN + I
The index of refraction of Cyanogenic iodide is n = 1.64 [US Army articles on the net]
With λ = c T: T (1) = 306 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 102 x 10 - 15
With λ = c T: T (2) = 388.9 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 129.633 x 10 - 15
Δ Γ = T (1) - T (2) = - 27.6333 x 10 - 15
And Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (v/c)
And Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (1/n)
And -2 sine ² arc tan (v/c) = - 0.1455
And t = Δ Γ / - 2 t sine ² arc tan (1/n) = - 27.6333 x 10 - 15/ - 0.1462 = 190 x 10 - 15
Or t = 190 x 10 - 15
The last shot is just a waste
Dr Zewail number is 200 +/- 30 femotseconds
Other Nobel Prize winner used the same visual trick at Micro scale
Then Nano technology came and used the same trick at nano scale
And then Pico technology came and used it at pico scale
It is a Bazzar of science and Cal - Tech is fighting # 1 Harvard for tricks
and no science
I am not saying Dr Ahmed Zewail is wrong what I am saying is they all wrong
Yes it is all visual effects and no science
10 - Stupidity is Alfred Nobel Physicists Modern physics lectures the night they received
their prizes. Time travel is stupidity. Dark energy is fraud. Big bag is a Hollywood physics
and a classroom joke. Expanding Universe has no proof; Astronomers yet to Learn how to
use the telescope. Elementary particles of high energy physics with life time of one part of
a billion billions of one second has no proof; etc. Modern Physics is all Garbage of MIT Cal-
Tech Harvard NASA and all other money hungry institutions; etc.
Finally the time has come to uncover the crooks of modern times and they all work on
college campuses with GED education and PHD tags and before uncovering the dumb
crooks like Bill Maher is doing it is time to uncover the ultimate crooks and that would be
Modern campus academia
This is just the beginning
Here is where Einstein got hanged with Alfred Nobel physics and physicists
1- Binary stars System

CD Draconis apsidal motion table:
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples CD Draconis
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples CD Draconis
Data: T=1.268389985days; m = 0.231 M (0); M = 0.2141 M (0); a = 3.7634 R (0); ε = 0.0051

And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [9.5 +/- 1; 10.0 +/- 1]; W° = 1.91x10^-3/day
Calculations
m + M = 0.4451 M (0)
1-ε = 0.9949; (1-ε²/4) = 0.99993498; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.01
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Calculations
With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 72.436 km/sec
And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 78.153 km/sec
And v° (p) = 9.5 km/sec; v° (s) = 10 km/sec

Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 170.117 km/sec
Apsidal motion is given by this formula:
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/1.238389985) (1.01) [170.09/300,000] ² degrees/100 years

W° (ob) = 6.731598944°/century = 0.06731598944°/year
U [years] = 360/[0.06731598944°/year]
U = 5348 years Nahhas
U (observed) = 5400+/-3200years
Einstein's and space-timers U = 360/ [0.00191x365.26] = 516 years
Can it get any better?
It is not just about dumping relativity it is dumping relativity and Alfred Nobel institution
with it.
References: Absolute properties of the low-mass eclipsing binary CM Draconis; 2009

By : Juan Carlos Morales; Ignasi ribas; carme jordi; Guillermo Toress; Jose Gallardo;
Edward F. Guinan; David Chardonneau; Marek wolf; David w.latham; Guillem Angalada
Escude; David H.Bradstreet; Mark E.Everett; Francis T. O, Donavan; Georgi Mandushev;
Robert D. Mathieu and other 15 authors
2- Binary stars System

As Camelopardalis apsidal motion table:
AS CAM apsidal motion table:
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples ASA CAM
1- AS Cam Data T=3.431; r(m) =0.1499; m=3.3 M(0) R(m) =2.57R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[40,30]
ε = 0.1695; 1-ε = 00.8305; r (M) =0.1111; M=2.5 M (0) R (M) = 2.5 R (0); m + M=5.8 M (0)
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x10^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Calculations: 1- ε²/4 = 0.9928; [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43

With a = [R (m)/r (m)] = (2.57/0.1499) (0.696x10^9) m
Then a (1-ε²/4) = (2.57/0.1499) (0.696x10^9) (0.9988) = 11.8470x10^9m
And v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 110.1786325km/sec
And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 145.435795km/sec
And v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 125.3756853km/sec
σ = √ {∑ [v-v (cm)] ²/2}

= √ {[(110.1786325-125.3756853)² + (145.435795-125.7356853)²]/2}
σ = 25.1659669
Spin: v° = 40 + 30=70km/sec
With v (m) = 110.1786325km/sec; v (M) = 145.435795km/sec
And v (cm) = 125.3756853km/sec; σ = 25.1659669km/sec
Then v* + v °= v* (m) + v* (M) + σ + v° = 350,7803944km/sec
[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43; T = 3.431days
W°= (-720x36526/T) x {√ [(1-ε²)] (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²

W°= (-720x36526/3.431) x (1.43) (350.7803944/ 300,000) ² = 15.0°/century
Dr Guinan: W°= 15°/century 1989
Or v* + v° = 2 v* (cm) + [v (M) - v (m)] + = 351.0

W°= (-720x36526/T) x {√ [(1-ε²)] (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W°= (-720x36526/3.431) x (1.43) (351/ 300,000) ² = 15.0°/century
Or v* = 2v* (cm) + σ = 275.9176729km/sec;

And v (k) + v° = 275.9176729 + 70 = 345.9176729km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ² = 14.6°/100 years

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/3.431) x (345.9176729) ²= 14.6°/100 years
Khailullin: 1983 v (p) =110.4; v(s) = 145.8; σ = 25.2685; 2∑ m v/∑m + σ + 70=346.0185

W°= 14.6 °/century same as reported
3 - Binary stars System: DI Her Apsidal Motion Solution

DI Her Apsidal motion solution:

Data: T=10.55days r(m) = 0.0621 m=5.15M(0) R(m)=2.68R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[45,45]
And ε = 0.4882; r (M) = 0.0574 M=4.52 M (0) R (M) =2.48; m + M=9.67 M (0)
L = 2000 +/- 200 Ly
Calculations
1- ε = 0.5118; (1-ε²/4) = 0.94; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; 1 + ε = 1.4882
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8km/sec
A- Apsidal motion is given by this formula:

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
And v° = - 45 km/s - 45 km/sec = 90km/sec

Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec
With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 212.76 km/sec
And v° = -90 km/sec
Then v* + v° = 212.76 - 90 = 122.76 km/sec and
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 122.76/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (122.76/300,000)²
W° (cal) = 1.39°/century
With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}
= √ {[106.36 - 99.88]²/2 + [106.36 - 113.8]²/2} = 6.975 km/sec
Then W° (cal) = 1.39°/century +/- 0.16
Observed 2004: 1.39° +/- 0.3°/century; Relativity: 4.27°/century
B - W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
With v° = - 45 km/s + 45 km/sec = 0 km/sec
And v* = v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/10.55) (106.38.300, 000) ² degrees/100 years
W° (cal) = 1.044 degrees/century
C - V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec

With v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1-ε) = 99.88 √ (.94)/√ (0.5118) = 135.36
And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 99.88 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 79.38
K (A) = [(135.36 + 79.38)/2] = 107.37 km/sec
V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8 km/sec

With v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1-ε) = 113.8 √ (.94)/√ (0.5118) = 154.2254 km/sec
And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 113.8 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 90.44312 km/sec
K (B) = 122.3342 km/sec

V* = [m K (A) + M K (B)]/ (m + M) = 114.3646 km/sec
Or v* = [K (A) + K (B)]/2 = 114. 85 km/sec
With v* = 114.85
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 114.85/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (114.85/300,000)²
= 1.22° degrees/ century
Observed: 1.24° degree/century +/- 0.05°
Anyone got this? This is Einstein's and 100,000 relativity education death certificate.
λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
Real time physics solution of r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] e [
That gave aApsidal rate better than anything said or published in all of physics of:
W° (Cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
The origin of relativity theory stupidity comes from Earth Orbit light aberration.
Orbit light aberrations can be found like this
Γ = t (Γ/t)

Δ Γ = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c]

sec/ century
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v +/-
v*)/c] arc sec/century
sec/century
sec/century
better

Venus
sec
35.1/300,000)
Earth
29.8/300,000)
Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit.

This same formula applies to stars

sec/century
Velocity of DI Herculis primary star is 99.88 km/sec

Velocity of DI Herculis secondary star is 113.8 km/sec
Velocity of DI Herculis center of mass is 106 km/sec
The common practice of 1/2 period is well established and it makes apsidal motion double its
value:
In 1984 DR Guinan and DR Maloney said it was 0 .65° and now 2010 it is 1.3° and in 2004
they said it is 1.04°.
Martynov in 1979 showed it 1.24° and in 2008 he said it is it is 1.3°
A range of 0.65° to 1.3° is Double
And reported periods of U = 46,700 years Petrova Manual to U = 27692.3 Martynov 2008.
Where all of this came from?
It all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period

sec/century
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/sec

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec
With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2 =103.5887398km/sec
And v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398
And v - v * = 73.7887398

sec/century
Δ Γ = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan
[(133.39)/300,000]
= 1.3° arc sec/century
In the 1/2 period method
Δ Γ = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc
sec/century
= 1.3 °/2 = 0.65°
Or, Δ Γ = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine ² arc tan [73.7887398] arc

sec/century
= 0.3933 °/century
And 2 Δ Γ = 0.795 or U = 45254 years
References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type:

1- Apsidal motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1985.
2- New Apsidal Motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1994.
3- D. YA. Martynov; and KH. F. Khaliulullin 1980
4- Petrie et al.1967
5- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue
6- Riazi 2003
7- Maloney Guinan 2004
4 - V1143Cgyni Apsidal Motion Solution

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
V1143 data
T= 7.641days r(m)=0.059 m =1.391M(0) R(1)=1.346R(0) [v°(m) ,v°(M) ]=[18,28]

ε = 0.54 r(M)=0.058 M=1.347M(0) R(2)=1.323R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[21,28]
M + m = 2.738 Distance = 38 +/- 2 parsec = 3.262 x [38 +/- 2 parsec] = 123.956 +/- 6.524 Ly
1-ε =0.46 1-ε²/4=0.9721 R (0) = .696x10^9m a = [R (1)/r (m)] R (0) =
15.87823729x10^9m
1+ ε = 1.54
With v (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε)] = 110 km/sec
And v (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 60 km/sec
K (A) = (110 + 60)/2 = 170/2 = 85km/sec
With v (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε)] = 113.6 km/sec

And v (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 62 km/sec
K (A) = (113.6 + 62)/2 = 175.6/2 = 87.8km/sec
With v (1) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 74.632 km/sec

And v (2) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 77.0699 km/sec
1- With v° [21, 28] = 28 - 21 = 7

2- With v° [18, 28] = 28 - 18 = 10
3- Taking average 10 + 7/2 = 8.5
With v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 77.5126 km/s
And v (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 80.00448 km/s
Also, [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.977622971
With v* (cm) = ∑m v∑/m = 78.73851759; 2 v* (cm) = 157.4770 km/sec
And σ = √ {∑ [v*-v* (cm)] ²/2} = √ {[77.5126 - 78.7385] ²/2} + {[80.0048 - 78.7385] ²/2}
= √ {[(1.22591759) ² + (1.2663) ²/2} = 1.24 km/sec
Now:
With 1- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 10 km/sec = 147.51648km/sec
And 2- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 8.5 km/sec = 149.01648km/sec
And 3- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 7 km/sec = 150.51648km/sec
W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
1- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (147.51648/300,000)²=3.31°/century

2- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (/300,000)²=3.3778°/century
3- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951)
(150.51648/300,000)²=3.44614561°/century
With v* = 2 v* (cm) = 157.4770 km/sec

And v ° = v° (p) - v° (s) = 21 - 28 = -7 km/sec
Then v* + v ° (p) = 157.477 - 7 = 150.477 km/sec
W° /century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (150.477/300,000)²=3.44°/century
Observed values are: W° = 3.393987698°/century; W° = =3.489592985
Average observed: 3.44°/ century
References:
1-Geminez and Margrave, 1985

[0.00071°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.393987698°/century
2- Anderson and Nordstrom and Garcia and Geminez 1987: 0.00073°/cycle
[0.00073°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.489592985°/century
Relativity theory: 4.254435283°/ century = 0.00089°/cycle
5- V541Solution: Apsidal motion catalogue

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
T = 15.3379days r(m)=0.0440 m = 2.4M(0) R(m)=1.88R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[24±2,24±2]

And ε = 0.479 r (M) =0.0425 M=2.4 M (0) R (M) =1.79 R (0)
With 1- ε = 0.521 1-ε²/4=0.94263975; [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.2339
And a = [R (m)/r (m)] R (0) = (1.88/0.0440)0.696x10^9m = 29.73818182x10^9m
Then a (1-ε²/4) = 28.03x10^9m
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 75.5883km/sec; v° (m) =24
And v (M) = √ [Gm²/a (m + M) (1-ε²/4)] = 75.883km/sec; v° (M) =24
With v°=24 + 24= 44km/sec
And v* = 151.1766km/sec
With v* + v°= 151.1766 - 48 = 103.1766km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (103.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.65°
Notice: [v° (m), v° (M)] = [24 ± 2, 24 ± 2]
If v° (m) = v° (M) = 24 + 2 = 26
Then v* + v°= 151.1766 - 52 = 99.1766km/sec
And W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (99.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.60°/century
Observed is W°= 0.60° +/ -0.1/century Lacy = [0.5°; 0.7°]
Relativity: W° = 0.97°/century
1- Apsidal motion of V541Cgyni Lacy 1989
6 - AI Hydra apsidal motion puzzle solution

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
AI Hydra Apsidal motion solution:
Data: T=8.29days r(m) = 0.1418 m=2.15M(0) R(m)=3.92R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[28,27]

And ε = 0.0.23; r (M) = 0.1002 M=1.98 M (0) R (M) =2.77(0); m + M=4.13 M (0)
L = 575 +/- 15 Ly
Calculations
1-ε = 0.77; (1-ε²/4) = 0.986775; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.6414
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 19.24062059 x 10 ^ 9 m
V (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 81.11439578 km/sec

V (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 88.11km/sec
With v* = v (m) + v (M) = 81.11439578km/sec + 88.11km/sec = 169.2243958km/sec

And v° = v° (m) + v° (M) = 28 + 27 = 55 km/sec
Then (v* + v°) = 224.2243958 km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 224.2243958/300,000]
= (-720x36526/8.29) (1.6414) (224.2243958/300,000)²
= 2.90°/ century
W° (observed) = 2.90°/century as measured
Observed is 2.90°/century
Space-Time Relativity theory 6.8° / century
Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m

= 2.15 x 81.11439578 + 1.98 x88.11= 84.46822 km/sec
With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 168.936411 km/sec
And v° = 55 km/sec
Then v* + v° = 223.9364411 km/sec and
W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 223. 936/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (223.9364411/300,000)²
W° (observed) = 2.9°0/century
With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}
= √ {[88.11 -84.46822]²/2 + [81.11439578 - 84.46822]²/2}
= √ {[3.64178]²/2 + [3.35382422]²/2} = 3.5 km/sec
Then W° (ob) = 2.9°0/century; observed is W° = 2.9°/per century
And Einstein's 100,000 space-timers6.8° / century
1- Apsidal motion of AI Hydra Popper 1985
2- KH. F. Khaliulullin and V.S Kozyreva 1988
3- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 1999
7-V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution

Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples V731Cephei
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples V731Cephei
Next the same equation will be used to find the advance of Periastron or "apparent" apsidal
motion of V731 binary stars system.
V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
V731data [see below]

T= 6.068567days; m= 2.577 M (0); M = 2.577 M (0); [v° (m), v° (M)] = [19+/-3, 18+/-3]
ε = 0.0165 a = 23.27x R (0)
Calculations
M + m = 2.738; 1-ε=0.9835 1-ε²/4=0.9999 R (0) = .696x10^9m
With v° [21, 28] = [19 +/- 3] + [18 +/- 3] = 37 +/- 6
With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 85.6111965km/sec
And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 109.38km/sec
Also, [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.033694356
With v* (cm) = 2∑m v∑/m = 96.46688km/sec; 2 v* (cm) = 192.9337619
And σ = √ {∑ [v*-v* (cm)] ²/2} = √ {[96.46688 - 85.6] ²/2} + {[109.38 - 96.46688] ²/2}
= 11.9288422 km/sec
With v* (p) = 85.6111965km/sec +/- 11.9288422 km/sec
And v* (s) = 109.38km/sec +/- 11.9288422 km/sec
Then v* (p) + v* (s) = [192.9337619 +/-] x 2 = 23.8567844 km/sec
Then v* + v° = 229.9288422km/sec +/- 29.8567844 km/sec
Now: Taking the upper limit
Then v* + v° = 229.9288422km/sec + 29.8567844 km/sec = 259.7856266 km/sec
W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W°/century= (-720x36526/6.068567) (1.033694356) (259.7856266 /300,000)²=2.91°/century
W°/century = 3.35914177°/century = 0.0335914177°/year
U = 360/0.0335914177° = 10717 years
Observed values are U = 10000 +/- 2500
References: 1- Absolute dimensional and apsidal motion of V731Cep
V. Batkis; M.Zejda; I. Bulut; M.Wolf; S. Bilir; H. Bakis; O.Demircan: J.w.Lee: M.Slechta:
B. Kucerova. 2008
8 - NV CMa Binary stars apsidal motion table
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples NV CMa
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples NV CMa
10 - NV CMa apsidal motion solution:

Data: T=1.885159 days; ε = 0; v* (p) = 128.55 km/sec; v* (s) = 130.87 km/sec
[√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; v° (p) = 51.7 km/sec and v° (s) = 52.4 km/sec
With v* = v* (p) + v*(s) = 259.42 km/sec and v° = v° (p) + v° (s) = 104.1
And v* + v° = 363.52 km/sec
W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 363.52/300,000]
= (-720x36526/1.885159) (1) (363.52/300,000)²
= 20.48333818°/century = 0.2048333818°/year
U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year;
U = 1757. 5 years

Absolute dimensions NV CMa; Kaluzny, J; Pych, W; Rucinski, S. M; Thompson, I.B
NV CMa Binary stars apsidal motion table
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples NV CMa
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples NV CMa
NV CMa apsidal motion solution:
Data: T=1.885159 days; ε = 0; v* (p) = 128.55 km/sec; v* (s) = 130.87 km/sec

[√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; v° (p) = 51.7 km/sec and v° (s) = 52.4 km/sec
With v* = v* (p) + v*(s) = 259.42 km/sec and v° = v° (p) + v° (s) = 104.1
And v* + v° = 363.52 km/sec
W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 363.52/300,000]
= (-720x36526/1.885159) (1) (363.52/300,000)²
= 20.48333818°/century = 0.2048333818°/year
U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year;
U = 1757. 5 years

Absolute dimensions NV CMa; Kaluzny, J; Pych, W; Rucinski, S. M; Thompson, I.B
11 - GG Orion Apsidal motion puzzle solution
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Examples GG Orion
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Examples GG Orion
Data: T=6.6314948; m = 2.342 M (0); M = 0.2338 M (0); R (1) = 1.852 R (0); R (2) =1.830
ε = 0.2218; 1 - ε = 0.7782; r (1) = 0.0746; r (2) =.988 r (1); m + M = 4.68 M (0)
And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [16 +/- 1; 16 +/- 1]; [v° (p); v° (s)] = [25 +/- 3; 24 +/- 3];
U = 10700 +/- 4500 years
Calculations
(1-ε²/4) = 0.9877; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.57
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Calculations
With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.6 km/sec
And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.735 km/sec
And v° (p) = 16 km/sec; v° (s) = 16 km/sec
Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 223.335 km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/6.6314948) (1.57) [223.335/300,000] ² degrees/100 years

W° (ob) = 3.45°/century = 0.0345°/year
U [years] = 360/[0.0345°/year]
U = 10,432 years Nahhas

U (observed) = 10700+/-4500years
References: Absolute dimensions and apsidal motion of eclipsing binary GG Orion
Dr Lacy; Dr Torres; Dr Claret; Dr Sabby: 2000
The time has come to send relativity theories and all four-dimensional space-time confusion
of physics to the...
joenahhas1958@yahoo.com all rights reserved

Harvard's Physics Department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity On You Tube

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Harvard's Physics Department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity On You Tube

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Newton's - Kepler's Ultimatum to Alfred Nobel Prize winner Physicists Stupidity

There are no physicists after us only "University" Idiots like you

What is wrong in all of physics is taking time dependent measurements wrong

Quantum - classical = relativity

Real time classical - classical = classical time delays

One and only one mechanics

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit speed Less Spin Angular

The angular speed is θ' = v/r

The time delay is:

W" = (v/R) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T); R = Earth - Sun Distance

Then I made the division and got the angular speeds

What is the angular velocity of mercury around the sun?

This mistake is due to French mathematician Le Verrier in his calculations of

Abstarct: Le Verrier mistake

Actual value is θ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v° (e)]/r

Or W" = (29.8 - 0.065/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century

This mistake of 43 seconds of an arc in measuring the orbital speed of planet

Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered another

Then θ' = {√ [G (m + M)/ a³]} x (180/π) (36526/T)

Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solution

This data transfer problem has a formula

Real time = Event time + time delays

Real time = Event time

Quantum = Newton + relativity

This is time delays and this formula

Erases Einstein's relativity stupidity and Feynman quantum mechanics

This following High school math formula

Δ Γ (x) = - 2 t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Δ Γ (x) = - 2 t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

And using the 1/2 cycle measurements

Δ Γ (x) /2 = - t sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] seconds

This following High school math formula

Visual Illusions deception are common in modern physics because

Δ Γ (x) = - 2 sine ² [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}

Kepler's Areal speed laws told us about this mistake

Or, r (1) θ'² (1) = r (2) θ'²(2) = location x speed = constant

Δ θ' = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} θ' (2)

The angular speed is θ' = v/r

Or, Δ W" = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

Δ W" = {{√[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and

T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)

The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton

T (1) = T (2) √ [M/ (M + m)]

And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)]

This approximation was not on the original work

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) = θ' (1) [1 /√ [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

With m = 0.32 x1024 kg

Einstein added k/ r4 to Newton's - Kepler's Gravitational force laws F = - GmM/r²

Einstein has no proof of the existence of this extra force + k/ r4

This make - up physics or rigging made by Einstein is fraud

Let us use this make - up and beat Alfred Nobel Physicists

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

S = m r; State = mass x distance

P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r

F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)

One: φ = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

S = m r; State = mass x location: