Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
(Received 22 August 2011; accepted 9 November 2011; published online 22 December 2011)
We present an overview of gauge fields in spintronics, focusing on their origin and physical
consequences. Important topics, such as the Berry gauge field associated with adiabatic quantum
evolution as well as gauge fields arising from other non-adiabatic considerations, are discussed.
We examine the appearance and effects of gauge fields across three spaces, namely real-space,
momentum-space, and time, taking on a largely semiclassical approach. We seize the opportunity
to study other spin-like systems, including graphene, topological insulators, magnonics, and photonics, which emphasize the ubiquity and importance of gauge fields. We aim to provide an intuiC 2011 American
tive and pedagogical insight into the role played by gauge fields in spin transport. V
Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3665219]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. TERMINOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III. SPIN-1/2 SYSTEMS IN THE PRESENCE OF
SPATIALLY VARYING MAGNETIC FIELD
TEXTURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Berry phase: Theoretical approaches . . . . . . .
1. Berry (1984) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Path integral formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Unitary transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Physical consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Spin-dependent forces: Chirality-driven
spin-Hall effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Domain wall characterization . . . . . . . . . .
3. Spin torque in domain walls . . . . . . . . . . .
IV. REAL SPACE GAUGE FIELDS IN
GRAPHENE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. A primer on graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Modeling the effects of strain. . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Physical consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Valley filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Valley-dependent forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Edge states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
V. SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING SYSTEMS: REAL
SPACE ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
a)
0021-8979/2011/110(12)/121301/29/$30.00
1
2
3
3
3
3
5
5
6
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
11
12
110, 121301-1
12
13
13
13
14
15
15
16
16
16
17
17
18
19
20
20
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
24
26
27
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-2
Fujita et al.
I. INTRODUCTION
II. TERMINOLOGY
2
1
~ r 1 glB~
~
~
p eA~
r B;
2m
2
(1)
(3)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-3
Fujita et al.
primed quantities ( is the energy eigenvalue), we get (ignoring the Zeeman term and after some algebra)
2
1
~0 rv jw0 i jw0 i:
~
p
hrk eA
(4)
2m
Setting k hev, wethen have
2
1
~0 jw0 i jw0 i;
~
p eA
2m
(5)
which is of identical form to the original (unprimed) Schrodinger equation. Thus, the system remains invariant with
~! A
~ rv and
respect to
transformations A
e the
jwi ! exp ihv jwi. In general, it is invariant to unitary
transformations (U belongs to the unitary group U1),
~0 A
~ ih UrU ;
A
e
(6)
jw0 i Ujwi:
(7)
~ r ;
r A~
(8)
/AB d~
C
In 1984, Berry3 showed that, during adiabatic cyclic evolution of quantum states, a geometric phase necessarily accompa-
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-4
Fujita et al.
~
time t > 0, it is in the state jwi Bti.
Specifically, the state
at time t can be written as having acquired a phase
i t 0 0
~
dt i t expici tjwi Bti;
(10)
jwti exp
h 0
where the first factor is the usual dynamic phase (i is the
energy eigenvalue of jwi i). Berry pointed out that adiabatic
transport around a closed circuit in parameter space is necessarily accompanied by an additional non-zero phase ci . Since
jwti must obey Schrodingers equation, Hjwti i jwti
i
h@t jwti, we get, by direct substitution,
i t 0 0
i exp
dt i t expici tjwi ti
h 0
i t 0 0 h
i
h exp
dt i t expici tjw_ i ti
h 0
i
i t 0 0
_ expici tjwi ti i t exp
dt i t
ict
h 0
~
expici tjwi Bti;
(11)
where the over-dot notation symbolizes differentiation with
respect to time. Canceling the non-zero phase factors, simple
algebra yields
jw_ i ti ic_ i tjwi ti 0;
(12)
which, after applying the state bra hwi tj, gives the following relation satisfied by ci t:
c_ i t ihwi tjw_ i ti:
(13)
~ hwi Bjr
~ B jwi Bi:
~
(14)
ci C i dB
Aad:
By;"
!
Bz
1
;
~
jBj
2 B2x B2y
(20)
Bx
Aad:
Bz;" 0:
Taking the curvature, XB rB Aad:
B , we then arrive at the
following components for the Berry curvature:
XBx;"
Bx
~3
2jBj
; XBy;"
By
~3
2jBj
; XBz;"
Bz
~3
2jBj
(21)
~
B
~3
2jBj
(22)
(15)
~
(16)
ci d S~ rB Aad:
i B;
where the quantity
~ rB Aad: B
~
Xi B
i
(17)
ci Cr i
d~
r hwi ~
rjrr jwi ~
ri;
(23)
Cr
r
Aad:
i ~
ihwi ~
rjrr jwi ~
r i is the
where the quantity
~
r -space Berry gauge field which mimics the usual magnetic
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-5
Fujita et al.
The path integral approach in quantum mechanics perhaps gives us the most intuitive explanation for the Berry
phase. In this formalism, the Berry phase appears as a firstorder accumulated phase of overlapping eigenstates as they
evolve in space, ~
r ~
rt, where t parameterizes the motion.
In particular, we dissect the time parameter t into discrete
steps of size tn1 tn Dt, compute the evolution of the
states between steps (through propagator operators), then
finally apply the adiabatic limit Dt ! 0. The final eigenstate
is then found to contain the Berry phase upon completion of
a circuit in parameter space. Suppose that, at time tn , the system is in a spin eigenstate jwi ~
rn ; tn i of the magnetic field
~ rn (i f"; #g), where ~
rn ~
r tn denotes the correspondB~
ing position in real space. At a short time later, tn1 , the
wavefunction can be described by the path integral
rn1 ; tn1 d~
rn G~
rn1 tn1 ;~
rn tn wi ~
rn ; tn ;
(24)
wi ~
rn tn h~
rn1 jUtn1 tn j~
rn i is the propagawhere G~
rn1 tn1 ;~
tor between time tn and tn1 and Utn1 tn
expiHtn1 tn . The propagator can be readily evaluated as
! +
*
~
iDtl~
rB
h~
rn1 jUtn1 tn j~
rn i wi;n1 exp
wi;n ;
h
!
~
iDtljBj
hwi;n1 jwi;n i exp 6
;
(25)
h
where the second line follows from first-order approximation
of the exponential, and the signs 6 refer to the up and down
spin eigenstates. The phase factor in Eq. (25) is just the usual
dynamic phase, which we shall ignore hereafter. Evaluating
the more interesting overlap between
evolved states,
we obtain hwi;n1 jwi;n i 1 hwi;n1 j jwi;n1 i wi;n i 1
jw_ i exp Dthw
jw_ i . We shall see that
Dthw
i;n1
i;n
i;n1
i;n
(26)
d~
r hwi ~
rjrr jwi ~
r i;
i
Cr
(27)
h
2
1
~ r U glB rz jB~
~ r j: (28)
U ~
p eA~
2m
FIG. 2. (Color online) A spatially varying magnetic field system (left), charac~ r , can be transformed via
terized by B~
local rotation to a locally uniform system (right). The effect of this is to modify the momentum of the carriers
~ where A
~ is a gauge field (see
~
p!~
p A,
~ is a true gauge field, in the
Eq. (28)). A
sense that it obeys the transformation
rule in Eq. (30) with respect to unitary
transformations.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-6
Fujita et al.
2
1
~ ihUrU 1 glB rz jB~
~ rj;
~
p eU AU
2m
2
(29)
2 1
1
~ hA~
~ r j;
~
p eU AU
r glB rz jB~
2m
2
H0
Bk
~3
2jBj
; (33)
2m
1
f~
p Az rz ; AN g AN 2 ;
2m
(34)
(35)
(36)
2m
8m
(37)
(38)
Thus, we find that the off-diagonal components of A contribute an additional scalar potential, U. Note that, in contrast to
the adiabatic vector potential in Eq. (32), the scalar potential
is spin-independent. Thus, in spintronic applications, the
term U is usually neglected (but see its effect on charge
transport in Eq. (172)).
C. Physical consequences
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-7
Fujita et al.
~
~
r-space, X~
r (and not the B-space).
The curvature in real
space is the one that represents a real magnetic field, which
~
is felt by spin carriers. Although the B-space
curvature is
always a Dirac monopole, the form of the ~
r -space curvature
~ r . To evaludepends on the exact spatial configuration of B~
ate X~
r , one can write down the ~
r-space Berry gauge field
(e.g., in Eq. (32)) and then take the real-space curvature in
Eq. (31) (having in mind the explicit spatial dependence of
angles h and /). Alternatively, it is possible to transform
~ directly via the relation10,11
XB
!
~ r @ B~
~ r
@
B~
~
;
(39)
Xk ~
r XB
@ri
@rj
~
@~
n @~
n
n
6
;
(40)
2 @ri @rj
~ Bj
~ is the unit vector pointing in the direction
where ~
n B=j
~
of B~
r and i; j; k are spatial coordinates.
1. Spin-dependent forces: Chirality-driven spin-Hall
effect
(41)
where ~
t i1h~
r ; H is the velocity operator in the Heisenberg
~2
picture. Writing the Hamiltonian as H P
2m (we ignore
the Zeeman term, as
to the Stern-Gerlach force),
this just leads
~ ~
~ Aad: ~
p eAR contains all the
where P
pe A
gauge fields, the velocity operator (jth component) reads
i
1 h
rj ; P2x P2y P2z ;
2im
h
2 i
1 h
rj ; pj eAR; j ;
2im
h
1 2
tj
(42)
(43)
Pj
1
:
pj eAR; j
m
m
(44)
1
Pj ; P2x P2y ;
2imh
1
Pj ; P2i i 6 j;
2imh
1
Pi ; Pj Pi Pi Pi ; Pj :
2imh
Fj
(45)
(46)
where the last line follows from Eq. (31). Substituting this
expression into Eq. (45), we obtain, for the force,
Fj eti Xk ~
rijk ;
(47)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-8
Fujita et al.
h
~
r
n @y ~
n dxdy;
(48)
F / Xz;ave: ~
n @x ~
eA0
~ Bj
~ in Eq. (40) and the integration is carried
where ~
n B=j
out over the unit cell area A0 . The factor h=e comes about by
converting the units for the curvature (1=r 2 ) to Teslas. The
application of an additional external magnetic field was
shown to result in a change of topology of the system, affecting the Hall conductivity in an unconventional way and providing an unambiguous signature of the effect. From the
semiclassical Drude theory, the Hall conductivity rxy (for
spin-up electrons) is proportional to the effective magnetic
field, which is given in Eq. (48),9
rxx eXz;ave: s
ne2 s
; rxx
;
rxy
m
m
(49)
(50)
(51)
where ~
j" is the electric current of the up-spin carriers. Intuitively, one would expect the localized spins to reorient themselves to minimize the interaction energy int . Thus, the local
magnetization dynamics should be governed by the gradient
~ r , i.e., they will experience
of the energy with respect to M~
an additional, topological switching field due to the Berry
r given by23
gauge field Aad:
" ~
~top 1 rn int ;
H
lM
h ji
@i ~
n~
n;
2M e
(52)
(53)
~
where ~
n M=M.
This additional switching field in the
presence of a current in magnets modifies the well-known
Landau-Lifshitz Gilbert equation,
~ M;
~
~_ ge H
M
2m
(54)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-9
Fujita et al.
p
~
d2 a21; 3; ~
d3 a1; 0. We can write
d1 a21; 3; ~
down the nearest neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian as
X
ar;i br;j h:c:;
(55)
H t
hi;ji;r
where ar;i (ar;i ) is the electron creation (annihilation) opera~i on sublattice A for spin r (the b operator on lattice site R
tors are equivalent, but for sublattice B). The nearest
neighbor hopping integral in Eq. (55) has approximate value
t 2:8 eV. The energy dispersion of H is
q
~ 6t 3 f k
~;
(56)
6 k
p
p
~ 2 cos 3ky a 4 cos 3ky a cos3kx a and the
where f k
2
2
sign () indexes the conduction and valence bands,
respectively. Equation (56) has degeneracies at the six corners of the Brillouin zone (see Fig. 3(b)), of which there are
two inequivalent types K and K 0 . These are known as the valleys of graphene. Expanding the dispersion in Eq. (56)
around the two valleys, we obtain
6 ~
q 6tF j~
qj;
(57)
q k~ K, and j~
qj jKj (or K 0 ).
where tF 106 ms1 , ~
The resulting conical dispersion suggests the presence of
massless Dirac fermions, whose velocity is independent of
energy, in stark contrast with conduction electrons in conventional semiconductors. This remarkable fact gives rise to
the many intriguing physical phenomena discovered in graphene. The corresponding low energy Hamiltonian of the
Dirac carriers in the K (K 0 ) valley are
H tF ~
r~
p;
0
p;
r ~
H tF~
(58)
(59)
where ~
r rx ; ry is a vector of Pauli matrices. Here,
the Pauli operators do not act on the electron spin, but rather
on the pseudospin, which indexes electron density on the
two sublattices A and B; e.g., the quantum state 1; 0T
denotes an electron situated on sublattice A.
B. Modeling the effects of strain
;
(60)
H tF~
r ~
p t1
F
~S r ;
H0 tF~
p t1
(61)
r0 ~
F A ~
~S has the form28
where A
1
ASx dt1 ~
r dt2 ~
r dt3 ~
r ;
2
p
3
dt2 ~
r dt3 ~
r :
ASy
2
(62)
C. Physical consequences
1. Valley filtering
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-10
Fujita et al.
FIG. 4. (Color online) Valley filter device comprised of (a) a region of uniform uniaxial strain along the armchair direction (strained bonds are highlighted) followed by (b) a magnetic barrier region.
/2
(66)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-11
Fujita et al.
FIG. 6. (Color online) (a) The quantum Hall state, induced by strong perpendicular magnetic fields in two-dimensional systems, comprised of an insulating
bulk and metallic edges. The edge states are chiral (uni-directional), owing to the broken TR symmetry, and consequently resist backscattering by impurities.
(b) The quantum valley-Hall effect arising in strained graphene is a TR symmetric cousin of the quantum Hall effect. Here, electrons in opposite valleys
(K and K 0 ) experience opposite vertical magnetic fields, which form two valley-resolved (chiral and anti-chiral) quantum Hall states. Backscattering of edge
states is only permitted with a corresponding switching of valleys. Thus, in the absence of TR-breaking impurities, the edge states will remain robust.
effective magnetic fields (defined, of course, by the curvature). Remarkably, it has been found experimentally that
strongly localized strains in graphene can result in a measurable effective magnetic field strength of up to 300 T,40 which
is well into the limit required by the QHE. Unlike the usual
QHE, however, the strained graphene system preserves TR
symmetry, which is reflected by the equal and opposite
effective magnetic fields experienced by carriers in opposite
~S B
~S K 0 . Due to the 2D nature
~S K r A
valleys: B
of graphene, only the vertical ^z-component of this magnetic
field is finite,
!
@ASy @ASx
S
~
^z:
(67)
B
@x
@y
Intuitively, this suggests the presence of two valley-resolved
copies of the QHE; one comprised of chiral K quantum-Hall
states, and the other of antichiral K 0 states, as illustrated in
Fig. 6(b), which result in valley-filtered counter propagating
edge states. Provided intervalley (K $ K 0 ) scattering is
neglected, the two copies are completely decoupled and
form a helical quantum valley-Hall (QVH) liquid41,42 with a
perfectly quantized valley-Hall conductance of 2e2 =h. In
fact, this state of matter is an example of a topological
insulator (refer to details in Sec. VI B 5), which essentially
generalizes the quantum-Hall state for TR symmetric systems. Another such example, the quantum spin-Hall
state,4346 is examined in Secs. V C 3 and VI B 5.
3. Edge states
~ 2
p t1
ht2F rz BS ;
H2 t2F ~
F A e
(68)
~ 2
H0 2 t2F ~
p t1
ht2F rz BS ;
F A e
(69)
(70)
~ @y Ax .
The effective magnetic field is calculated from B
Given that dt1 is actually an abrupt function of y, we obtain
~ < 0 for y < 0 (illustrated by ) and B
~ > 0 for y > 0 (illusB
trated by
). This implies that the graphene is pseudospin
(A; B) polarized on opposite sides of y 0 and that it supports edge states along the zig-zag edge.
For armchair edges, we cut along the dotted line x 0
shown in Fig. 7(b). This is modeled by setting dt1 0, while
dt2 dt3 t (it is convenient to consider the points
x 0 or x 0 ). The induced gauge field is then
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-12
Fujita et al.
FIG. 7. (Color online) Forming graphene edges by severing bonds as shown for (a) zig-zag and (b) armchair edges. This induces local gauge fields, whose curvatures represent effective magnetic fields capable of polarizing the pseudospin. Zig-zag edges are associated with a finite pseudospin polarization and, thus,
are able to support edge states. Armchair edges, on the other hand, do not polarize the pseudospin and, thus, cannot support edge states.
~armchair t; 0:
A
(71)
~ @y Ax vanishes
Apparently, the effective magnetic field B
for the armchair edge. Thus, we see that armchair edges
should not support edge states.
The above are consistent with prior theoretical studies
of graphene edges, which conclude that zigzag edges possess
localized states, while armchair edges do not.52,53 Further
details of the gauge field formalism to describe edge states
are found in Refs. 28 and 51.
V. SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING SYSTEMS: REAL SPACE
ANALYSIS
A. Spin-orbit coupling basics
~
p2
h2
V 2 2~
r k~ rV ;
2m
4m c
(72)
where ~
p
hk~is the momentum, m is the electron mass, V is
the electrostatic potential, and c is the speed of light. The
spin-orbit Hamiltonian in Eq. (72) above is derived for
electrons in a vacuum upon reducing the relativistic Dirac
equation in the low energy limit.54 Qualitatively, the effect
can be understood from special relativity arguments; for an
~ rV
electron moving through a lattice, an electric field E
is Lorentz transformed to an effective magnetic field
~ in the rest frame of the electron.54,55 Since the SOC
k~ E
strength is inversely proportional to the relativistic energy
gap mc2 0:5 MeV, the effect in vacuum is highly suppressed. In SCs, however, the effect can be significantly
enhanced, as the energy gap can be of order 1 eV.54,56,57
Phenomenologically, Eq. (72) represents an electron in the
presence of a momentum-dependent effective magnetic
~~
field, B
k,
H
~
p2
~
~ k;
V c~
r B
2m
(73)
6
h2 k~2
~
~ kj:
V6cjB
2m
(74)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-13
Fujita et al.
HD g kx ky2 kz2 rx ky kz2 kx2 ry kz kx2 ky2 rz ;
(76)
where g is the coupling strength. Quite often, we are interested in low dimensional systems, such as in a 2DEG, in
which Eq. (76) collapses into a k-linear form,57,62
(77)
HD b kx rx ky ry ;
where b gp=dz 2 and dz is the width of the quantum well
along ^
z. Typically, b is around one order of magnitude
smaller than a in actual semiconductor samples. Often, however, we are interested in the scenario when b ! a. This
condition can be approached experimentally in extremely
narrow quantum wells, dz ! 0, since b / dz2 .
Less commonly studied is the strain-induced SOC.6365
Strain in zinc blende semiconductors, such as GaAs and
InSb, is represented by a symmetric tensor ij ji in the
Hamiltonian
C3
xy ky xz kz rx zy kz xy kx ry
2
zx kx yz ky rz ;
(78)
HSt B Tr
P
where Tr i ii and the constant Ch3 8 105 m/s in
GaAs. When we identify the off-diagonal components with
an electric field in the remaining direction, ij ! Ek , the
strain Hamiltonian is completely analogous to the generic
spin-orbit Hamiltonian in Eq. (72), with an additional contribution from the B-term.65
B. Non-Abelian gauge field representation
1
e 2
~
p A ;
2m
c
(79)
h
rV ~
r
4mce
(80)
where
A~
r
is a real-space gauge field, and we note that the transformation is not exact, but an approximation (second order terms
are neglected). The spin-orbit gauge field, A~
r above, is
another example of a gauge field which is not associated
with adiabatic transport of quantum states (see Sec. III B): it
appears merely as a result of rearranging the Hamiltonian.
For example, in the case of Rashba SOC, the gauge field has
the explicit form
r
AR ~
am
ry ; rx ; 0:
eh
(81)
XRz ~
r
ie h R R i 2a2 m2 z
Ay ; Ax
r:
h
eh3
(82)
~
An analogous treatment can be applied to the k-linear
Dresselhaus SOC in 2DEGs, and we find that the curvature is given by
r
XD
z ~
2b2 m2 z
r:
eh3
(83)
/AC d~
r A~
r:
(84)
In contrast to the AB effect, the gauge field in the AC effect
does not break TR symmetry,69 occurring in the absence of
magnetic fields. We briefly discuss the relationship between
the AC phase and the Berry phase (see, for example, Refs.
72 and 73). Firstly, we note that the AC phase is simply the
TR symmetric AB phase in Eq. (8). The well-known AB
phase comes from computing the flux threaded by a closed
~ It is inherloop (in ~
r-space) in a region of space with finite A.
ently a non-adiabatic phase factor with respect to quantum
state evolution. Such generalizations of the adiabatic Berry
phase to any (especially non-adiabatic) cyclic evolution of
quantum states is known as the Aharonov-Anandan (AA)
phase.74 Indeed, in the limit of slow cyclic evolutions, the
AA phase approaches the Berry phase.
Hatano et al.73 proposed a method to achieve perfect
spin filtering by utilizing the interplay between the AC phase
due to Rashba SOC in a semiconductor 2DEG and the AB
phase due to an externally applied magnetic field. According
to Eq. (82), spin-up and spin-down electrons experience
equal and opposite effective vertical magnetic fields. Therefore, they acquire equal but opposite AC phases in Eq. (84).
Hatano conceived a spatial circuit such that up (down) spin
electrons acquired an AC phase of p=2 (p=2). Furthermore,
a finite magnetic vector potential was assumed to be present
in the interior of the circuit, such that both spin-up and spindown electrons acquire an AB phase of p=2. In this scenario,
spin-up electrons acquire a total phase of expip 1,
which is completely destructive, while spin-down electrons
acquire a total phase factor of unity which is completely constructive. This results in a perfect spin filter whose output
only consists of spin-down electrons.73 The polarity of the
filter can be switched (such that the output consists of spinup electrons) by reversing the direction of the applied magnetic field.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-14
Fujita et al.
yt y0
2a2 m2 tx z
r:
h3
ent of the magnetic field strength. We also note that the spin
along the ^z-direction, with operator rz , is not a good quantum
number of the Rashba SOC system and that the spins will
undergo time evolution in the form of spin precession about
the effective Rashba field. This implies that both rz and Fy
in Eq. (85) are generally time-dependent. As ~
p is a good
quantum number, we put ~
p px x^ without loss of generality
and, for simplicity, assume an initial vertical spin-up state.
Then, the ^z-component of the spin as a function of time is
given by rz t cosxc t, where the Larmor frequency is
xc 2akx . Semiclassically, we then obtain the y^-position of
carriers by double integration of the acceleration obtained
from Eq. (85),
(85)
Clearly, Eq. (85) indicates that spin-up and spin-down polarized currents experience equal and opposite transverse
forces. This is illustrated in Fig. 8. One important note is that
this force is proportional to a2 , where a governs the strength
of the Rashba effective field. This is in stark contrast with
the force due to Berry curvature, which is always independ-
1
cosxc t;
2kx
(86)
FIG. 9. (Color online) (a) Illustration of proposed device, in which a transverse separation of spins occurs in response to a longitudinal charge current J. The
~SO (vertiseparation occurs heuristically as a result of spin-dependent forces due to (i) Rashba SOC, which is characterized by the perpendicular electric field, E
~ r. The directions of the spin-dependent force arising from the Rashba SOC, F
~SO , and from
cal, dark arrow), and (ii) a spatially nonuniform magnetic field, B~
~Berry , are indicated by arrows. We note that the forces from the two contributions act in opposite directions. The degree of cancellation
the Berry curvature, F
between the two forces can be modulated via a gate bias. This leads to the potential modulation of the transverse spin-current by purely electric means. (b) The
configuration of the spatially nonuniform magnetic field characterized by chirality h.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-15
Fujita et al.
h
z
Xz ~
r 2eR
2 r (where R is defined in Fig. 9(b)), which, for a
drift velocity tx along x^, produces a spin-dependent force
along y^ of
htx z
r:
Fy
2eR2
eh3
:
2m2
(88)
~
p 2 C3 g
(89)
(90)
C3 gm z
r y; x; 0
2eh
(91)
where
(87)
1
~
p eA2 ;
2m
C3 gm z
r:
eh
(92)
1
e 2
~ r ;
~
p AR JH ~
r M~
2m
c
(93)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-16
Fujita et al.
The square brackets contain two gauge fields, the first being
the SOC-induced non-Abelian gauge potential and the second being the transformation-induced potential. The latter,
~top
of course, gives rise to the topological switching field H
shown in Eq. (53). We are presently concerned with deriving
the switching field due to the former SOC-induced term.
Expanding this term, we obtain
~;
nE
(95)
UAR U arz ~
which is Abelian. In the limit of strong exchange coupling
JH ! 1, we assume a fully spin-polarized gas and apply the
adiabatic approximation. The corresponding interaction
~
energy between an electronic
currentj and
the local magnetj UAR U j " , and the switching
ization is then int " j~
field defined by Eq. (52) is79
~so aji @nj Ek ijk :
H
l0 M @~
n
(96)
jx Ez
; Hso;z 0:
l0 M
(97)
(98)
where a~
r characterizes the spatially varying SOC, cf. Eq.
(81). The curvature, in this case, contains additional contributions from the curl, together with the non-Abelian term
(see Eq. (82)),
m @a x @a y
2a2 m2 z
R
r r
r
r:
(99)
Xz ~
eh @x
@y
eh3
This could affect various aspects of carrier transport, including
the zitterbewegung. Spatial discontinuity of SOC in multilayered structures can also produce interesting effects. Consider a
trilayer structure with a 2DEG channel, as illustrated in Fig.
10(a), in which the 2DEG exhibits Rashba SOC and the two
contact regions do not. In the simplest case, the spatial profile
FIG. 10. (Color online) (a) Trilayer structure in which the 2DEG channel
has Rashba spin-orbit coupling, while the two contact regions do not. (b)
The spatial discontinuity of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling induces spatially
narrow effective magnetic fields at the interfaces, which are spin-dependent,
rx 61.
a0 m
dx dx Lrx
eh
2a2 m2
0 3 Hx Hx Lrz ;
eh
(100)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-17
Fujita et al.
~
Following that method, we proceed to lock the k-dependence by applying a local transformation to the system, which
~ This is facili~ k.
rotates the reference spin axis to lie along B
~
tated by a unitary matrix U Uk, given by Eq. (27),
~
where, in this scenario, the h; / are the k-dependent
spheri~ The trans~ k.
cal angles parameterizing the direction of B
formed Hamiltonian reads
H0 UHU
h2 k~2
~ UV~
~ kj
crz jB
r U :
2m
(101)
(102)
~
~
Ak iUrk U is a 2 2 gauge field in k-space. In the
adiabatic limit, we are only interested in the diagonal compo~ which represent the two subbands of the SOC.
nents of Ak,
~
Following Eq. (32), we can write down the k-space
Berry
gauge fields as
1
~
~
~
Aad:
6 k 6 1 cos hkrk /k;
2
(103)
k
n
k
~ 6 ~
~
Xk k
;
(104)
nk
2
@ki
@kj
~ Bj
~ is the unit vector pointing along the direcwhere ~
n B=j
~ As we shall see below, the
~ k.
tion of the spin-orbit field, B
~ represents an effective magnetic field in
curvature Xk
~
k-space, which can influence the orbital motion of carriers.
B. Physical consequences
(105)
1 @s ~_
~
~
r_
k Xk:
h @ ~
k
(106)
The first equation, Eq. (105), describes the force acting on car~
riers, which includes a contribution due to an electric field, E,
and the ~
r-space Berry curvature, X~
r (and magnetic field,
~ r , if present). The second equation, Eq. (106), describes
B~
the velocity of wave packets, which includes the usual group
velocity and also a contribution from X~
k. This contribution
is often called the anomalous velocity. Evidently, the anomalous velocity in Eq. (106) is of analogous form to the Lorentz
force in Eq. (105): the two equations are invariant upon inter~ Drawchanging the role of the position, ~
r , and momentum, k.
~
ing from this observation, we remark that Xk essentially
~
gives rise to a Lorentz force in k-space.
Historically, Eq.
(106) was derived by Karplus and Luttinger in 1954 (Ref. 91)
when they tried to explain intrinsic contributions to the anom~ arises from the
alous Hall effect in ferromagnets. Here, Xk
Bloch wavefunctions in crystal momentum space. The connection with topology, however, was made only recently.90
Equation (106) describes topological transport in a vast
array of condensed matter systems with a finite momentum
space Berry curvature, which are discussed below.
1. Spin-Hall effect
jks;j
Ei
(107)
~
5
k2
~ 2 V~
c1 c ck~ S
r;
2
2
(108)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-18
Fujita et al.
states with opposite signs of the chirality are degenerate, corresponding to the two-fold degenerate light-hole (LH,
jkj 1=2) and heavy-hole (HH, jkj 3=2) bands. Parameterizing the momentum vector as k~ j~
kjsin h cos /; sin h sin /;
cos h, we proceed to transform the Hamiltonian
H0 UHU
~
~ z,
with a 4 4 unitary matrix U, satisfying U k S~ U jkjS
3
which is diagonal in the spin-2 space. The resulting 4 4
~ iUrk U , which, in the adiabatic
gauge field is Ak
limit, reduces to two 2 2 copies corresponding to LH and
HH states. Due to the degeneracy of the LH and HH bands,
the Berry gauge fields here are non-Abelian (their components
are non-commuting). However, we may make them Abelian
by removing their off-diagonal components, upon which the
exact form of the Berry gauge fields are reminiscent of Eq.
(103), but upon replacing the factor 12 ! jkj. The corresponding Berry curvature reads89
~
~ k k ;
Xk
(109)
j~
kj3
~
i.e., it is a Dirac monopole in k-space
with strength equal to
the hole helicity, eg k. Substituting the expression for the
curvature in Eq. (109) into the equation of motion, Eq. (106),
the anomalous velocity component is given by
k~
_
ta kk~ 3 ;
j~
kj
(110)
~
which is perpendicular to both the applied electric field E
_ ~
~
~
(since k / E) and the momentum vector k. Since the chirality of the holes has sign k > 0 < 0 for hole spins (anti-)
parallel to ~
k, the KL velocity is perpendicular to the spin S~
and points along opposite directions, depending on the sign
of the chirality. This transverse separation of the spins gives
rise to the SHE of holes in the Luttinger system.
A similar effect is predicted in n-doped zinc blende semiconductors with k3 -Dresselhaus SOC.98 From the Hamiltonian
in Eq. (76), we can easily compute the Berry curvature,
~ 6ijk
Xk k
(111)
~ is the
~D k
where 6 represents the two SOC subbands and B
~D . The SHE
rB
effective Dresselhaus field, i.e., HD g~
results from the Berry curvature for electrons that are collimated, namely, traveling in a highly unidirectional manner.
Methods to achieved electron collimation are essentially analogous to beam collimation in optics, whereby the principle of
total internal reflection is employed, e.g., in optical fibers. In
electronic collimation, the role of the refractive index is played
by the local carrier density; for details, see Refs. 98100.
Assuming electron collimation along the ^z-axis, we have
jkx j; jky j jkz j, and the Berry curvature above is reduced to
~ 6ijk
Xk k
kz4 kx2
ky2
k:
~ 3 k
~D kj
2jB
(113)
~ x;
ta;y k_z Xx / Ez f ks
(114)
~
where f k
kk , which indicates a spin-Hall effect in
both x^ and y^ directions.
Analogous Berry phase effects are predicted to be important for explaining the intrinsic SHE in metals, such as
platinum.102 Metals may be favorable as a platform for utilizing SHE over semiconductors due to several reasons,
including larger spin-Hall conductivity102,103 and the fact
that FM contacts to harness the generated spin current do not
suffer from poor injection difficulties.104
(115)
~
p_ rt~
rp;
(116)
jzi
_ i~
p_ A~
pjzi;
(117)
where t~
r is the velocity of light and jzi t z ; z denotes
p and A~
p are the Berry curthe polarization state.106,107 X~
vature and the gauge field, whose expressions will be
explained in the next paragraph. As can be seen from these
equations, the electric field in the semiclassical equations of
motion for electrons is replaced by the spatial variation of
the refractive index.
In order to derive the equations of motion, one method
is to use the variational theory.107 Here, we discuss another
derivation, using an effective Hamiltonian. In the geometric
optics (GO) approximation, light propagation in a spatially
inhomogeneous medium is modeled by the effective
Hamiltonian
H
(112)
1 2
~
p n2 ~
r Q;
2
(118)
where ~
p is the momentum, n~
r is the spatially varying refractive index, and Qij pi pj is a 3 3 matrix in the spin-1
space. The GO model is known to be excellent when the
wavelength of the light is much smaller than length scales
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-19
Fujita et al.
q
p2x p2y p2z . It is well known that, for 2-fold
~
p
;
p3
(121)
(122)
(123)
where U~
r is a confinement potential for magnons and n~k
denotes the magnon dispersion for the nth band. These
equations are quite similar to those for electrons, and similar
phenomena are theoretically predicted. One difference, however, comes from the fact that the magnon has no charge
and, therefore, cannot be driven by electric field. Instead, the
magnon wavepacket can be driven by temperature gradients.
The effect of temperature gradients can be described also
from the semiclassical equations of motion, Eqs. (122) and
(123), using the picture of the edge current.
Near the edge of the sample, the confining potential
U~
r gives rise to the anomalous velocity (the second term
of Eq. (122)) along the edge. The total current along the
edge forms an edge current, which is the same for all the
edges. (We note that, in contrast to edge modes in quantum
Hall systems, this current is not confined at the edge of the
sample, but it mixes with a bulk magnon current.) Because it
is a circulating current, it has no net transport. Such an edge
current depends on the temperature through the Bose distribution function. Therefore, if there is a temperature gradient,
the edge current is not equal between the two sides of the
sample, giving rise to a net transverse current. As a result,
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-20
Fujita et al.
2kB2 T X
c2 qn Xz ~
k;
hV ~
(124)
n;k
log 1q
q
2
where
c2 q 1 q
log q 2Li2 q,
q qnk~ is the Bose distribution function and Li2 z is the
polylogarithm function.
Apart from these results based on semiclassical theory
of the Berry curvature, there have been some works on the
thermal Hall effect.116118 The formula presented in Refs.
116 and 117 by the linear response theory is different from
Eq. (124). This difference is attributed to the missing terms
in the linear response theory in Refs. 116 and 117, and the
modified linear response theory developed in Refs. 114 and
115 gives an identical result with Eq. (124).
The thermal Hall effect of magnons has been measured for
the pyrochlore ferromagnet Lu2 V2 O7 ,117 and the result agrees
well with that estimated from Eq. (124).114 In addition, because
the Berry curvature is associated with the wave nature, this
theory is also applicable to classical magnetostatic spin-wave
systems, such as yttrium-iron garnet (YIG). In YIG film, the
demagnetizing field gives rise to an anisotropy in the spinwave spectrum, giving rise to the coupling between the spin
and the orbital motion. This induces a nonzero Berry curvature,
resulting in thermal Hall effect and edge current of magnons.
The spin-wave transport in YIG has been intensively
studied in experiments,119,120 because of its long coherence
length and its potential application to spintronics. The wave
packet of spin wave can be observed optically, and the coherence length can be as long as centimeters. Therefore, YIG
is expected to offer a good stage for observing dynamics of
wave packets arising from the ~
k-space Berry curvature.
4. Valley-Hall effect in graphene
~
The Berry curvature in k-space
also arises in gra122,123
We consider monolayer graphene with a sublatphene.
tice asymmetry, namely, that the A and B sublattice sites are
energetically different. This can be represented by adding a
Zeeman-like term in the pseudospin space,
~ p Urz ;
r B~
H tF ~
(125)
nU
3
(126)
2p2x p2y U 2 2
The valley-dependence of Eq. (126) means that electrons
residing in opposite valleys will become separated upon
application of an electric field, leading to the valley-Hall
effect. This effect was discussed in Ref. 122. In particular, a
finite Hall voltage is predicted if there is an imbalance of
electron distribution in the two valleys; such a situation
The Berry curvature structure is also present in topological insulators (TI). Let us begin with a short introduction to
TIs (otherwise, the reader may skip directly to the Hamiltonian in Eq. (127)); the interested reader is directed to the
comprehensive review article by Hasan and Kane.124 Currently, TIs represent a field attracting immense research interest due to the highly interesting physics, mathematics, and
potential device applications. The first example of a TI was
found in the quantum-Hall effect (QHE), which was discovered experimentally in 1980.39 Just like an ordinary insulator, the bulk quantum Hall state is gapped (the valence and
conduction bands are separated in energy) and nonconducting. But unlike a normal insulator, the quantum Hall
state supports electronic transport at the edges of the sample,
which have remarkable characteristics: they are chiral (they
traverse along a definite direction along each edge), gapless
(there are edge states at any Fermi energy lying within the
bulk gap), and are extremely robust to the presence of disorder or the geometry of the edge. The quantum Hall conductivity (QHC) can be expressed in terms of a Chern integer n,
a topological index which remains invariant to continuous
deformations of the system125 (this is detailed in Sec. VI C,
below). This gives the QHE state a topologically non-trivial
classification (in conventional band insulators, the index n
vanishes). Up until recently, it was thought that all topologically non-trivial insulators were inherently TR-breaking.
It was only until after the discovery of graphene that the
TR-symmetric topologically nontrivial insulating phase was
discovered. In 2006, Kane and Mele43,44 proposed that, when
spin-orbit coupling (SOC) was considered in graphene, the
electrons behaved as though two time-reversed copies of the
quantum Hall effect were placed one on top of the other. In
this case, the edge states exist in pairs; electrons of opposite
spins ("; #) traverse along opposite directions along each edge
(they are helical), they are gapless, and they are robust to backscattering by non-magnetic impurities (for backscattering is
only permitted when a spin is flipped). As mentioned earlier, a
similar theoretical proposal has been made by Bernevig and
Zhang in strained semiconductors.45 This two-dimensional
effect is known as the quantum spin-Hall effect (QSHE). The
2D QSHE was proposed to occur in the HgTe quantum well
system,46 which has been verified by transport measurement.47,48 In the HgTe quantum well, which is supposed to be
the quantum spin-Hall system, the measured conductance is
2e2 =h, which is a direct evidence that there are two perfectly
conducting channels corresponding to the edge states.
The 2D QSHE was generalized to 3D systems by Fu and
Kane.126 In 3D topological insulators (TIs), spin-filtered
surface states arise as opposed to edge states. These have no
quantum charge Hall effect analogs. At low energies, the
surface states form 2D Dirac cones, i.e., they are massless
Dirac fermions governed by the graphene-like Hamiltonian
r~
p;
H tF ~
(127)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-21
Fujita et al.
~ s ~
~ t k
~
tr
J
kP
kJ
kP
X
X
x
y
1
~
nt ns k;
~ t k
~
A s;t6 ~
im s k
k
(133)
~ nF s k
~ , the summawhere nt ns ~
k nF t k
tion over n in the last line is calculated by the Matsubara
~ is the Fermi distribution function of subsum, and nF s k
band s. We now do the conversion from Matsubara Greens
function to the retarded Greens function in order to obtain
the Hall conductivity,
rxy lim
x;g!0 x
(134)
~ ~ ~ ~
i X X tr Jx kPs kJy kPt k
nt ns ~
k;
~ s ~
A s;t6 ~
t k
k2
k
(135)
~
iX
f k
~
n n k;
~
~ 2
A ~ k k
(136)
~ k
~ 2
where the denominator is evaluated to be k
2 ~~ 2
4c jBkj from Eq. (74) and
~ kJ
~ y kP
~ ~
~ kJ
~ y kP
~ k
~ :
kJx kP
f ~
k tr Jx kP
C. Hall conductivity
(137)
We derive the Hall conductivity for the general spinorbit Hamiltonian in Eq. (73) using the Kubo method and
show that it is intimately connected to the ~
k-space Berry curvature. By definition, the single-particle retarded Greens
function is given by
~ x ixI H1 :
Gk;
(128)
~ 0 k
~
~
~a k
@Hk
@B
c
ra ;
@ki
@ki
@ki
(138)
1 X @na @nc
~
nb
acb n n k:
@kx @ky
2A ~
(140)
rxy lim
x!0 x
Qxy x ig;
(130)
1 X ~ ~
~ k;
~ ixn ;
tr Jx kGk; ixn m Jy kG
Qxy im
Ab ~
k;n
(131)
where A is the system area and xn and m are the fermionic
and bosonic Matsubara frequencies, respectively. Substituting
the Greens function in Eq. (129) into the above, we obtain
~ s ~
~ t k
~
tr
J
kP
kJ
kP
X
X
x
y
1
;
Qxy im
Ab s;t6 ~ ixn m s k
~
~
ix
k
n
t
k;n
(132)
Lx Ly 2 ~
1
@~
n
@~
n
~
d
k
n
;
(141)
rxy
2A FBZ 4p2
@kx @ky
1
~
kXz k;
d2 ~
(142)
2
8p FBZ
where Lx Ly A, and, in the last step, we have used Eq. (40).
Thus, we see that the Hall conductivity is the integral of the
~
k-space
Berry curvature, Xz ~
k, over the FBZ if the Fermi
energy lies inside the energy gap.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-22
Fujita et al.
(143)
The gauge field in time-space arises naturally in spintronic systems in which there is a time-dependent magnetic
~ The Hamiltonian of such a system takes the form
field, Bt.
2
1
~ r 1 glB~
~
~
H
p eA~
r Bt:
2m
2
(144)
(146)
(148)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-23
Fujita et al.
(152)
~
n_ ~
n component represents a physical magnetic field which
couples to the electron spins.8,132
B. Physical consequences
1. Spin-Hall effect
(149)
H1
~
p
~
~ k
c~
r B
2m
(150)
(151)
~
p2I
~ k~I t;
c~
r B
2m
(153)
where
2
2 2~ ~
~~
~ eEi t @ Bk e Ej El t @ Bk
~ k
~ k~I t B
B
2
h @ki
@kl @kj
2h
(154)
and summation over repeated indices is implied. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (153) is that of an electron subject to an explic~ as
itly time-dependent magnetic field, which we denote Bt
in Eq. (144). The origin of the gauge potential A0 t then follows from Eq. (145).
The gauge field A0 t leads to the intrinsic SHE in the
Rashba SOC system, discovered by Sinova et al.133 For
Rashba SOC, the effective spin-orbit field hasqdirection
~
n p1 py ; px ; 0, as in Eq. (75), where p p2x p2y .
Assuming an electric field applied along the x^-direction,
~ Ex x^, we obtain ~
E
n_ p1 0; eEx ; 0 (of course, p here carries a time-dependence through px , but which is weaker than
that of px itself. To a first approximation, we assume a constant p). Since ~
n is strictly in-plane (i.e., it lies in the x^-^
y
~? term in Eq. (148) represented by
plane of the 2DEG), the B
A0 is an out-of-plane magnetic field, which is along the ^zdirection by convention.
The SHE is an adiabatic phenomena in SOC systems.89
Let us here attempt to quantify the requirement for adiabatic~
~ kj
ity. In the ideal adiabatic limit, the magnetic field jB
should be infinitely strong, such that the spins always remain
~ is finite and the rel~ kj
aligned to it. However, in practice, jB
evant adiabatic condition reads
~ jB
~? j;
jBj
(155)
~ but with a
~ k,
i.e., the electron spin is primarily aligned to B
~? . For the Rashba SOC system, the
small component along B
adiabatic condition is
ak2
Ex :
e
(156)
~R
h B
;
~R j
2 jB
(157)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-24
Fujita et al.
sz 6
eh3 py Ex
:
4ap3
~6
W
(161)
(159)
~
w6 B
;
w6 A
2meEx ky
h2 k4
(162)
h2
~
~BLG k;
~
sB
2m
(160)
We consider the dynamics of spin particle in the presence of a magnetic texture that is nonuniform in both space
and time. The single electron Schrodinger equation for the
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-25
Fujita et al.
~
p2 1
~ r; t ;
gl ~
r B~
2m 2 B
ad:
E i F 0i @t Aad:
i @i A 0 ;
(163)
(164)
where A~
r and A0 t are the spatial and temporal gauge
fields, respectively. We consider the adiabatic limit. Under
this approximation, the transformation-induced gauge potentials become (see Eq. (32))
1
r rz 1 cos hrr /;
Aad: ~
2
(165)
1 z
Aad:
0 t r 1 cos h@t /;
2
(166)
~ r; t and the
where rz denotes the two spin eigenstates of B~
Hamiltonian in Eq. (164) reads
2 1
1
~ hAad:
~
p Aad: ~
r glB rz jBj
0 t U ; (167)
2m
2
where U is the spin-independent potential which arises from
the quadratic terms of the non-diagonal elements of A~
r after applying the adiabatic approximation [see Eq. (38)]. This
can be written compactly as
U
1
1
rh2 sin2 hr/2
r~
n2 ;
8m
8m
(168)
where ~
n sin h cos /; sin h sin /; cos h is the unit vector in
spin space and r~
n2 @i nj @i nj . To calculate all forces in
the system, it is instructive to lump all of the potential terms
together,
1
~ 1 r~
n2 :
A00 rz 1 cos h@t / glB jBj
2
8m
(169)
(170)
(171)
(174)
(175)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-26
Fujita et al.
~
applied B-field
direction and, hence, that of the spin texture
n^. For simplicity, we assume the net n^ to be pointing in the
z-direction. Thus, from Eq. (175), one directly obtains the
spin and charge currents as
j 0 r0 j r r0 10 E 0 1z E z rz 1z E 0 10 E z :
(176)
(177)
k m
where 1SH 1sjSH 1ss
SH 1D 4 es1 pmDqF u, where D is
the diffusion constant, qF is the density of states at the Fermi
level, and u is the impurity scattering potential.161,162 As
before, we assume the net spin texture to be in the vertical
direction (^
nl dlz ) and the applied ordinary electric field to
be in the x-direction. Then, the Hall currents are
(178)
ti
~
~ k
1
pi
@ B
ri ; H c
~
r:
m
ih
@pi
(179)
~ jBj~
~ n, the partial derivative
Writing the spin-orbit field as B
in Eq. (179) can be expanded into its magnitude and directional parts as
~ @jBj
~
@B
n
~ @~
~
:
n jBj
@pi
@pi
@pi
(180)
n~
n
~R j @pi 2c
m
@pi
jB
~? gives it the corwhere the conversion factor of h=2c for B
rect units of Tesla. The first term is the kinetic velocity and
is of no interest here. We focus on the second term. In the ad~ jB
~? j, the second term in Eq. (181)
iabatic limit, i.e., jBj
reads
ti c
@~
~ h
@jBj
n
~
:
n_ ~
n
@pi 2
@pi
(182)
@~
n
By the chain rule, ~
n_ k_j @k
, where summation over j is
j
implied. Rearranging the terms, we obtain
ti c
~ k_j @~
@jBj
n @~
n
~
n:
2 @ki @kj
@pi
(183)
TABLE I. A summary of gauge fields, the context in which they occur, and their physical (measurable) consequences.
Space
Real space, ~
r
Momentum, k~
Time, t
Context
Physical consequences
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-27
Fujita et al.
We have examined the origin and physical consequences of gauge fields in spintronic and other spin-like systems, such as photons and graphene. The gauge fields can lie
~
in three spaces, namely, real space ~
r, momentum space k,
and time t. Berry gauge fields are associated with the adiabatic transport of quantum states with respect to parameter
space. We summarize this paper in Table I below.
In ~
r -space, Berry gauge fields arise in the presence of
spatially nonuniform magnetic fields or magnetization (e.g.,
a domain wall); see Sec. III. Non-Abelian ~
r-space gauge
fields can arise from spin-orbit coupling (Sec. V) or, for
example, in graphene that has been mechanically strained
(Sec. IV). Generally, the ~
r -space gauge fields can be considered as magnetic vector potentials which affect carrier transport via Lorentz forces (see Secs. III C 1, IV C 2, and V C 2)
or exert spin torque (Secs. III C 3 and V C 4).
~
In k-space,
Berry gauge fields due to spin-orbit coupling
arise ubiquitously in spintronic, optical, and graphene systems (see Sec. VI). Such gauge fields can be considered as
~
describing magnetic fields in k-space
and give rise to an
anomalous velocity (analogous to the Lorentz force in
~
r-space). This leads to observable effects, such as the spinHall effect.
Finally, time-dependent gauge fields arise in the presence of time varying magnetic fields. Physically, they lead to
the spin-Hall effect and spin motive force (see Sec. VII B).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-28
50
Fujita et al.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53
121301-29
153
Fujita et al.
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP:
143.107.180.128 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:05:53