You are on page 1of 4

j8y 1ef!

/<Ji~

/i.f).

SECTION XII
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION

D. NO. 3058 OF 2013


...Petitioner

Revathi Pampapathy
Versus
Selvam Ramaswamy

To :

...Respondent

Ms. Revathi Pampapathy, Petitioner - in - Person


Email: revathi.p.77@gmail.com
D/o. Dr. D. Somam Bigai & Late Dr. M. Pampapathy,
24/20, New Temple Land HUDCO,
Hosur 635109,
Tamil Nadu
WHEREAS by this Registry's letter dated 12thMarch, 2013 and

3rd September, 2013, you were required to cure the defects as stated in the
said letter within twenty eight days and fifteen days respectively to cure the
defects as stated in the said letters. (Copy of defects is enclosed)
AND WHEREAS you have not cured the defects so far and thus
you have not been diligent in prosecuting the appeals above-mentioned.
You are, therefore, required to explain your default under Order
X Rule 6(3), 6(4) of Supreme Court Rules 1966. Ifno satisfactory steps are
taken to cure the said defects within twenty eight days of the receipt of this
notice. Further action as contemplated under the above rules will be taken in
the matters.
Dated this, the 13th day of August, 2014.
~,'>\81~
ASSISTANT REGIStRAR
pb

SECTION-XII

D. No. 690/2013/XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
Dated this the 1~ day of March, 2013
From:

Assistant Registrar

To:

Ms. Revathi Pampapathy, Petitioner - in - Person


Email: revathi.p.77@gmail.comJ)/o.ht . .[)80fn4I..>blfjiU&UJJi.~.H.Iti
~..J ..'/':J..{)I NUl) 7tmp/a laN:! HlI.iI~, HoBUr f.3.'5 !err.7a""d~,
D. No. 3058 OF 2013

~...1

........ Petitioner

Revathy Pampapathy
Versus

...... Respondent

Selvam Ramaswamy
Sir,

I am directed to inform you that you have not taken any steps to
_,Jure defects pointed out to you by this Registry's ~ - mail on 6th February,
2013 even after lapse of more than a months time.
You are, therefore, requested

to taken urgent steps to cure the

defects within twenty eight days, failing which the matter will be lodged by
placing the same before Ld. Registrar

under Order X Rule 6 (3) & (4) of

Supreme Court Rules, 1966.

Yours faithfully,

,
eB

! of

f\1.aL'"""

~(>
Assistant Registrar

I
. No. 690/2013IXII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2013
From:

Assistant Registrar

To:

Ms. Revathi Pampapathy, Petitioner - in - Person


Dlo Dr. D. Somambigai and Late Dr. M. Pampapathy,
24/20, New Temple Land Hudco,
Hosur-6~5109, Tamil Nadu
Email: revathi.p.77@gmail.com
D. No. 3058 OF 2013
........ Petitioner

Revathy Pampapathy
Versus

...... Respondent

. Selvam Ramaswamy
Sir,
,_

In continuation of this Registry's letter of even number dated 11th

March, 2013,

I am directed to inform you that you have not taken any

steps to cure defects pointed out to you by this Registry's E-mail

on 6th

February, 2013 even after lapse of more than a month time.


You are, therefore, again requested to take urgent steps to cure
the defects within fifteen days time from the receipt of this letter, so that the
matter may be processed further.

Yours faithfully,

~~,~ZfV

Assistant Registrar
,

"

Files of D. No. 3058/13 of E.;filing


matter received from, Section-XII
on 19.7.2013."
,
Matter is still defeqtive for the following reasons:- ,
i.

'rnpugnedorderchallenged

has not been filed.

ii. In view of Para 1 of Special Leave Petition please clarify why order
under challenged was not challenged before the High Court.
,

'.

iii. Para 1~to 8 of SpeCial Leave Petition not drafted properly.

iv.Highlighted

v.lt

'

~h be replaced.
,

is not clear whether SpeCial Leave Petition has been filed or


tr~risfer petition.

vi. Detailed cause title not given in SpeCial Leave Petition.

Vii."Prayerof Special leave Petitiorinot given. 't


---~---""-"""""-"-""'~""--'."'''''''''-''

viii.Listing
'filed.
'proforma, Index, Memo of Appearance & List of dates not
ix. Documents filed after
Annexu!res.

Special Leave

Petition to' be filed as

x Translation of vernacular documents with InterloculoryApplication


e :

' for exerpption of official translation is required.'

xi. An Application for permiSSionto appear and argue. in person not


. filed.

" "

xii. Court fee of Rs. 265/- paid only.

You might also like