Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
Department of Applied Chemistry, Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi 487-8501, Japan
c
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001,
China
b
Abstract FactSage has been used to predict the ash behavior and ash fusion temperature (AFT) at high temperature under reducing atmosphere conditions. For Huainan coal ash samples, it has demonstrated a good agreement
between the liquid phase formation as the function of temperature and the tested AFT. The tested and predicted flow
temperature (FT) for two typical Huainan coal ashes with the addition of CaO flux are quite fit with the maximum
temperature difference less than 74 which is within acceptable range. It can be concluded that FactSage in combination with X-ray diffraction (XRD) can be used to predict the reactions occurring between minerals, as well as
the mineral transformation and slag formation. This is probably an improved way to interpret melting properties of
mineral matter in coal and assist in quantifying slag formation in gasifier operation.
Keywords ash fusion temperature, FactSage, ash transformation, Huainan coals
INTRODUCTION
The coal ash related problems are major concern
to many coal companies and electrical power utilities[13]. The formation of slagging and fouling deposits in combustion, agglomeration in fluidized beds,
ash slag flow in integrated gasification combined cycleIGCCand other slagging reactors are directly
related to the formation of liquid slag and to the stabilities of solid crystalline phases[4,5]. The traditional
methods used to characterize the high temperature ash
behavior of the coal are becoming increasingly outdated and are unable to accurately predict the behavior
of ash and slag in coal and coal blends in combustion
and gasification technologies[613]. Progresses in
chemical thermodynamic and viscosity models of oxide systems, the development of computational methods, computer software and hardware now make it
possible to accurately predict the phase equilibrium
conditions in complex multi-component coal ash slag
systems[14,15].
Recently, studies on the prediction of ash fusion
temperature (AFT) were undertaken with the aid of
computer thermodynamic model[1619]. FactSage[20]
was introduced in 2001 and was developed jointly by
both the FACT-Win/F*A*C*T and ChemSage/
SOLGASMIX thermochemical packages that were
founded over 28 years ago. The FactSage package
consists of a series of information, database, calculation and manipulation modules that enable one to access and manipulate pure substances and solution databases. FactSage is an extremely powerful tool with
which one can perform a wide range of thermochemical calculations useful to chemical and physical metallurgists, chemical engineers, inorganic chemists,
geochemists, electrochemists, environmentalists, etc.
It provides information on the phases formed, their
proportions and compositions, the activities of individual chemical components and the thermodynamic
properties for all compositions, pressures and temperatures.
Having a significant impact on coal selection internationally (e.g. CRIEPI, ECN-Energy Research
Centre of the Netherlands, EERC-North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center, Hongik University in South Korea, Chubu University Japan),
FactSage is already being used in the design of
step-change technologies in the evaluation and selection of coal for entrained flow coal gasification and
blast furnace iron making by research teams in the
world. The most important features of the FactSage
system are the large evaluated multi-component solution databases giving the thermodynamic properties as
functions of temperature and composition. FactSage
contains databases for 15-component oxide/glass solutions, ceramic solution such as spinels, solid and
liquid salt solution, metallic alloy solutions and aqueous solutions, etc. Each of these databases has been
prepared by critical evaluation and optimization of all
available data using appropriate solution models.
In order to understand the ash behavior of
Huainan coals, the FactSage Thermodynamics Model
(FactSage 5.1) was used to evaluate the liquid phase
Application of the FactSage to Predict the Ash Melting Behavior in Reducing Conditions
RESEARCH METHOD
FactSage Thermodynamic Model was used for
predicting multi-phase equilibria, proportions of the
liquid and solid phases in specified atmosphere for the
multi-component system.
Calculation conditions for FactSage Thermodynamic Model:
(1) Chemical composition
The ash composition of Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3,
Na2O, K2O, MgO, SiO2, SO3, P2O5, TiO2 was input in
the table of the software.
(2) Solution species
FACT-SLAG solution included MgO, FeO, Na2O,
SiO2, TiO2, Ti2O3, CaO, Al2O3, K2O, MgS, CaS, FeS,
Na2S, Na3PO4, Ca3(PO4)2, Mg3(PO4)2, Fe3(PO4)2.
(3) Gas atmosphere
The reducing atmosphere of 60% CO and 40%
CO2 was employed in the FactSage calculation.
(4) Pressure
The pressure for the FactSage calculation was
0.1MPa.
(5) Temperature
The initial temperature and final temperature for
the FactSage calculation were 800 and 1600,
respectively with the interval of 20.
3.2
785
Chemical composition and melting temperature for the coal ash samples
Composition, % (by mass)
T,
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2O
SO3
P2O5
TiO2
DT
ST
FT
39.8
41.8
9.19
1.13
0.36
0.24
2.29
0.71
0.20
3.35
>1500
>1500
>1500
HNC13
42.1
40.2
3.94
5.77
0.59
0.41
1.13
1.78
1.22
2.26
>1500
>1500
>1500
HN115
42.3
34.5
6.17
8.55
1.00
0.21
0.76
3.20
0.55
2.24
1335
1360
1400
HN119
42.0
36.9
3.21
9.93
0.44
0.37
0.17
3.82
0.2
2.08
1434
1451
1480
KL1
47.1
35.3
4.72
5.67
0.75
0.26
1.33
2.22
0.19
1.96
1450
1500
>1500
HNP01
50.1
32.9
8.42
1.37
0.62
0.45
2.17
1.00
0.34
1.51
1425
1495
>1500
786
XM
HN115
HN119
KL1
HN106
HN113
quartz
4.29
4.1
3.6
0.79
1.22
iron oxide
1.58
0.65
0.48
0.36
periclase
0.02
0.06
0.03
rutile
0.44
0.03
0.42
0.41
0.15
alumina
0.38
1.47
0.71
0.75
0.62
2.96
calcite
1.79
5.93
11.57
3.01
0.16
8.63
dolomite
1.37
4.93
0.6
1.4
0.12
ankerite
0.55
1.39
0.49
0.1
kaolinite
32.67
50.15
67.63
64.99
55.31
70.92
montmorillonite
7.1
1.01
0.51
1.12
0.42
0.21
K Al-silicate
8.79
2.86
8.63
11.8
0.47
Fe Al-silicate
0.47
0.34
3.59
0.54
1.04
Ca Al-silicate
0.05
0.67
0.19
0.3
0.01
1.85
Na Al-silicate
0.03
0.79
0.18
1.67
aluminosilicate
0.28
0.14
0.05
0.07
0.04
0.14
mixed aluminosilicate
0.05
0.05
0.33
Fe silicate
0.05
Ca silicate
0.06
0.13
0.15
0.16
Ca aluminate
0.07
0.04
pyrite
10.53
12.25
6.03
2.94
10.06
0.73
pyrrhotite
1.07
0.1
oxidized pyrrhotite
0.22
0.01
0.27
0.45
0.24
gypsum
5.55
0.2
0.05
0.36
0.26
apatite
0.13
0.09
0.47
Ca-Al-P
0.09
NaCl
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.35
KCl
0.13
0.12
0.41
0.03
0.01
0.29
gypsum/Al-silicate
Si-rich
0.48
0.15
0.22
0.06
Ca-rich
0.07
0.11
1.55
0.1
0.11
0.06
Ca-Si rich
0.05
unknown
22.05
10.78
6.78
7.13
17.49
7.45
100
100
100
100
100
100
totals
December, 2006
Application of the FactSage to Predict the Ash Melting Behavior in Reducing Conditions
Figure 1
Mass percentage of liquid phase for representative Huainan coal ash samples
- - HN115; - - - - HN119; HNC13;
- - - KLI; HNP01; - HN106
787
788
Table 3
Ash samples
Predicted FT,
Temperature difference,
HN115
1400
1389
11
HN115(CaO,8%)
1445
1451
HN115(CaO, 15%)
1340
1396
56
HN115(CaO,20%)
1280
1302
22
HN115(CaO,25%)
1280
1294
14
HN115(CaO, 30%)
1310
1384
74
HN115(CaO,42%)
>1500
1481
HN106
>1500
>1600
HN106(CaO,8%)
1470
1470
HN106(CaO,15%)
1450
1418
32
HN106(CaO,20%)
1360
1326
34
HN106(CaO, 25%)
1310
1288
22
HN106(CaO, 30%)
1310
1364
54
HN106(CaO,42%)
1500
1512
12
Figure 3
The XRD patterns of HN115 coal ash at different temperature under reducing atmosphere (Q-Quartz, M-Mullite,
AN-Anorthite, G-Gehlenite)
T, : 11150; 21250; 31350; 41450
CONCLUSIONS
(1) FactSage has been an important tool to predict the ash behavior and AFT at high temperature
under reducing atmosphere conditions.
(2) Huainan coal ash samples have demonstrated
a good agreement between the liquid formation as the
function of temperature and the tested AFT as well as
the ash transformation tendency with the changes in
temperature. Two typical Huainan coals have been
selected for the comparison of tested FT and predicted
FT with the addition of CaO flux. The results show
clearly that the measured FT and the predicted FT are
quite fit with the maximum temperature difference
less than 74 which is within acceptable range.
(3) The ash transformation results by FactSage
calculation are consistent with the results by XRD. It
can be concluded that FactSage in combination with
XRD can be used to predict the reactions occurring
between minerals, as well as the mineral transformation and slag formation. This is probably an improved
Application of the FactSage to Predict the Ash Melting Behavior in Reducing Conditions
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the key project of
Huainan Municipal Government, Anhui Province
(Project No.2003001) and the project of Japanese
Government Loan. The authors acknowledge the contributions made by the members of Ninomiyas Lab,
Chubu University and the Ash Chemistry Lab of Anhui
University of Science and Technology.
10
11
12
13
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
789
Llyod, W.G., Riley, J.T., Zhon, S., Risen, M.A., Ash fusion temperatures under oxidizing conditions, Energy
and Fuels, 7, 490494(1995).
Seggiani, M., Empirical correlations of the ash fusion
temperatures and temperature of critical viscosity for
coal and biomass ashes, Fuel, 78, 11211125(1999).
Yin, C., Luo, Z., Ni, M., Cen, K., Predicting coal ash
fusion temperature with a back-propagation neural network model, Fuel, 77, 17771782(1998).
Huggins, F.E., Kosmack, D.A.,Huffman, G.P., Correlation between ash-fusion temperatures and ternary equilibrium phase diagrams, Fuel, 60, 577584(1981).
Huffman, G.P., Huggins, F.E., Dunmyre, G.R., Investigation of the high temperature behavior of coal ash in
reducing and oxidizing atmospheres, Fuel, 60, 585
597(1981).
Goni, C., Helle, S., Garcia, X., Gordon, A., Parra, R.,
Kelm, U., Jimenez, R., Alfaro, G., Coal blend combustion: Fusibility ranking from mineral matter composition, Fuel, 82, 20872095(2003).
Yan, L., Gupta, R.P., Wall, T.F., The implication of mineral coalescence behavior on ash formation and ash
deposition during pulverized coal combustion, Fuel, 80,
13331340(2001).
Yin, C.G., Luo, Z.Y., Ni, M.J., Cen, K.F., Predicting
coal ash fusion temperature with a back propagation neural network model, Fuel, 77, 17771782(1998).
Rhinehart, R.R., Attar, A.A., Ash fusion temperature: A
thermodynamically-based model, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.,
Petroleum Division, 8, 97101(1987).
Kondratiev, A., Jak, E., Predicting coal ash slag flow
characteristics, Fuel, 80, 19892000(2001).
Qiu, J.R., Li, F., Zheng, C.G., Mineral transformation
during combustion of coal blends, Int. J. Energy Res.,
23, 453463(1999).
Jak, E., Degterov, S., Zhao, B., Pelton, A. Hayes, P., Coupled experimental and thermodynamic modelling studies
for metallurgical smelting and coal combustion systems,
Metal. Trans., 31B, 621630(2000).
Bale, C.W., Chartrand, P., Degterov, S.A., FactSage
thermochemical software and databases, Calphad, 26,
189228(2002).