Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ecological Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 January 2011
Received in revised form 8 May 2011
Accepted 17 June 2011
Available online 20 July 2011
Keywords:
Coniferous pinus bark biomass
Biosand lter
E. coli
Decentralized treatment
Total coliforms
a b s t r a c t
The removal of microbial and physico-chemical contaminants was investigated using an innovative
biosand lter (BSF) containing three combinations of coniferous pinus bark biomass (CPBB), i.e. 1 cm
(treatment 2), 2.5 cm (treatment 3) and 5 cm (treatment 4). The efciency of BSF was assessed in batch
mode experiments and the comparative reductions of contaminants were monitored over the control
treatment (1) at temperature range of 115 C for 90 days. Standard methods were used to analyze 9
operating, physico-chemicals and biological water quality parameters of pre-and post-water ltration
samples after 15 days interval. The results showed mean 93 2% and 95 3% reductions of Eischerichia
coli and total coliforms, respectively, for BSF containing the highest depth of CPBB (5 cm), whereby 100%
removal was observed during the treatment time T30 to T45 days. The general afnity sequence for E. coli,
total coliforms and turbidity removal in the four treatments was: BSF with 5 cm CPBB > BSF with 2.5 cm
CPBB > BSF with 1 cm CPBB > Control. It was concluded that modied BSF with additional adsorbent of
locally available CPBB is a very good decentralized treatment option for drinking water.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Childrens Emergency Fund (UNICEF) global assessment reports have
indicated that most of the worlds human population do not have
access to microbiologically safe drinking water, while one sixth of
the world population (1.1 billion people) have access to adequately
safe water supplies (Mara, 2008; Varbanets et al., 2009). Approximately 80% of communicable diseases in the world are water-borne
(Shengji et al., 2004). The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
set a target to halve the proportion of people without sustainable
access to safe drinking water and sanitation by 2015 compared to
1990. WHO (2004) assessed progress toward MDGs and reported
that considerable progress was achieved in the provisions of safe
drinking water, increasing from 71% in 1990 to 80% in 2004. But
there is still a long way to reach this goal by 2015 (WHO, 2004; UN,
2006; Mara, 2008).
Microbial contamination of drinking water causes dozens of
infectious diseases in developing countries (Arnal et al., 2001). The
underlying reason seems to be that treatment methods are generally non-functional and their effectiveness cannot be guaranteed
where they are implemented. Presently, boiling of water is mostly
Corresponding author. Tel.: +92 992 383591/5; fax: +92 992 383441.
E-mail address: mahmoodzju@gmail.com (Q. Mahmood).
0925-8574/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.011
a number of performance reports have addressed BSF implementation, users satisfaction and the percent removal of E. coli and
thermotolerant coliforms in the eld conditions (Kaiser et al., 2002;
Earwaker, 2006; Duke et al., 2006; Stauber et al., 2006). In developing countries, the suitability of intermittently household slow
sand lter is gaining impetus (Palmateer et al., 1999). More than
100,000 BSFs are providing improved drinking water to more than
500,000 people worldwide (Fewster et al., 2004; Elliott et al., 2008).
Conventional BSFs can remove suspended solids and microbes by
the top biological layer (schmutzdecke) above a few centimeters
of the sand column, which offers the capability to remove 99% of
enteric waterborne pathogens, if properly constructed, operated
and maintained (Hijnen et al., 2004). No such study on conventional BSF performance has been reported in temperate regions,
particularly in Pakistan, so far.
BSF is one of the affordable decentralized or household water
treatment options which has been practiced for a long time and
is economical to construct, operate and maintain (Buzunis, 1995,
Manz, 2007). However, the ltration of this household BSF does
not fulll the recommended national and international drinking
water quality guideline values in removing pathogens and physicochemical pollutants. Further, the current established Manzs design
BSF (ibid.) was not compatible with the temperate environment
in general and Pakistans environment in particular, based on
geographic and atmospheric variations due to lower ltration efciencies. The conventional slow sand lters are less efcient in
removing pathogens from drinking water. In view of this problem,
an innovative BSF containing coniferous pinus bark biomass (CPBB)
as an additional adsorbent medium, its low cost and local availability were hypothesized to improve drinking water quality in order
to meet the drinking water quality standards.
Therefore, the objectives of the study were to develop a modied BSF with a focus on measuring the comparative efciency
of BSF to reduce E. coli, total coliforms and other pollutants, and
thus improving of drinking water quality with respect to National
Environmental Quality Standards of Pakistan.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Biosand lter design and modication
After the success of sand ltration at a large scale in late 20thcentury in Europe, researchers at University of Calgary, Canada,
developed a scaled-down adaptation of this technology at the
household level of intermittent operation called with BSF (Sobsey,
2002). The current BSF design with CPBB was used with a view to
improve drinking water quality with respect to Northern areas of
Pakistan where bacteriological contamination was prevalent. So,
our modied BSF was suited for mountainous regions in general
and northern Pakistan in particular due to its light weight.
1843
Fig. 1. Modied BSF containing only sand as lter medium (control BSF).
Fig. 2. Modied BSFs 2, 3 and 4 containing 1 cm, 2.5 cm and 5 cm CPBB as lter media
within sand column and free board space of 19 cm, 17.5 cm and 15 cm, respectively.
0.48
1844
0.46
0.44
0.42
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.30
1. Control BSFs
2. 1 cm media depth
3. 2.5 cm media depth
4. 5 cm media depth
0.28
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Fig. 3. Hydraulic ow rates of the four treatments during the operating treatment
times.
(CI) of the means and plotted in each gure. Therefore, any two
treatment means would be declared signicantly different from
each other when their CI of the means would not overlap, otherwise they would be considered as statistically on par with each
other.
3. Results
The experiments were conducted during January 2010 to March
2010. During these three months, laboratory-based controlled
experiments the temperature ranged from 1 to 22 15 C.
3.1. Hydraulic ow rate over operating time
The overall hydraulic ow rates of all the four modied BSFs
or treatments (1, 2, 3, and 4) showed decreasing hydraulic ow
rates over the operating time, when 20 L were daily poured to each
treatment. Hydraulic ow rate of the control BSF (1) containing
only sand with a uniformity coefcient 3.54.0 mm was compared
with the other three treatments i.e. 2, 3 and 4 CPBB as lter media
with depths of 1 cm, 2.5 cm and 5 cm respectively. The control BSF
(1) showed less decline in ow rate starting from 0.45 L/min at
time T0 to 0.40 L/min at time T90 (days) and gradual reduction in
ow rates were observed during the operating time periods (Fig. 3).
In treatment 4 the abrupt decline in ow rate from 0.43 L/min at
time T0 to 0.36 L/min at treatment time T15 (days) indicated the
possible compaction of the 5 cm CPBB followed by the similar situation for the other two treatments 3 and 2, respectively, containing
comparatively less CPBB depths. After the treatment time T15, the
reduction in ow was again comparatively gradual from 0.36 L/min
at T0 to 0.33 L/min at treatment time T90 (days). The sequences of
the ow rate in each treatment were recorded as: 1 > 2 > 3 > 4.
3.2. E. coli reductions
The E. coli removal efciency of all the four treatments increased
from treatment time T0 to treatment time T30 (days), where the
100% removal of E. coli in treatment 4 (5 cm of CPBB) was recorded
and showed signicant difference in the removal of pathogens as
compared to the other treatments. High removal was observed due
to the high depth of CPBB and where the ow rate was 0.36 L/min
due to the compaction of the lter media. The removal was not
only due to depth of the lter media but also due to the high residence time, head loss buildup and surface charge characteristic
of the lter media. From treatment time T30 to T60 (days) in all
the treatments the E. coli reduction efciency was maintained at
1845
120
1. Control BSFs
2. 1 cm media depth
3. 2.5 cm media depth
4. 5 cm media depth
Controlled Turbidities
100
Turbidity (NTU)
80
60
3
2
20
50
40
40
30
20
10
0
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Time (days)
1. control BSFs
2. 1cm media depth
3. 2.5cm media depth
4. 5cm media depth
Fig. 6. Turbidities of the pre- and post-water ltration of the four treatments or
BSFs.
Fig. 4. E. coli removal (% age) in the four treatments or BSFs over 90 days operating
time period.
60
100
60
40
20
0
T0
T15
1. Control BSFs
2. 1 cm media depth
3. 2.5 cm media depth
4. 5 cm media depth
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Fig. 5. Reduction of total coliforms (% age) in the four treatments or BSFs during the
operating time period.
1846
pH
7.86
7.84
7.82
7.80
7.78
7.76
7.74
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Fig. 7. pH variations of pre and post water ltration during 90 days treatment times.
160
140
Hardness (mg/L)
120
4. Discussion
100
80
60
40
20
0
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Fig. 8. Variations of pre and post hardness in four treatments or BSFs during 90 days
experiments.
showed the pre and post ltration hardness and chloride values
during 90 days treatment time periods. Both hardness and chloride
values decreased from pre- to post-ltration and comparatively a
greater decline was found for treatment 4 containing 5 cm CPBB. It
120
Chloride (mg/L)
100
80
60
40
20
0
T0
T15
T30
T45
T60
T75
T90
Time (days)
Fig. 9. Variations of pre and post chloride in four treatments or BSFs during 90 days
experiments.
1847
1848
Elliot, M.A., Stauber, C.E., Koksal, F., Liang, K.R., Huslage, D.K., DiGiano, F.A., Sobsey, M.D., 2006. The operation, ow conditions and microbial reduction of an
intermittently operated household scale slow sand lter. In: Recent Progress in
Slow Sand and Alternative Bioltration Processes, Proceedings of the 4th International Slow Sand and Alternative Biological Filtration Conference , Mulheim
an de Ruhr, Germany. IWA Publishing, London, pp. 268277.
Elliott, M.A., Stauber, C.E., Koksal, F., DiGiano, F.A., Sobsey, M.D., 2008. Reductions
of E. coli, echovirus type 12 and bacteriophages in an intermittently operated
household scale slow sand lter. Water Res. 42 (1011), 26622670.
Fewster, E., Mol, A., Brandsma, W., 2004. The long term sustainability of household
biosand ltration. In: 30th WEDC International Conference , Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Gerba, C.P., Hou, K., Sobsey, M.D., 1988. Microbial removal and inactivation from
water by lters containing magnesium peroxide. Environ. Sci. Health 23 (1),
4158.
Haarhoff, J., Cleasby, J.L., 1991. Biological and physical mechanisms in slow sand
ltration. In: logsdon, G. (Ed.), Slow Sand Filtration. American Society of Civil
Engineers, New York.
Heistad, A., Paruch, A.M., Vrle, L., Adam, K., Jenssen, P.D., 2006. A high-performance
compact lter system treating domestic wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2 (8),
374379.
Hijnen, W.A., Schijven, J.F., Bonne, P., Visser, A., Medema, G.J., 2004. Elimination
of viruses, bacteria and protozoan oocysts by slow sand ltration. Water Sci.
Technol. 50 (1), 15421552.
Huisman, L., Wood, W.E., 1974. Slow Sand Filtration. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, pp.
3335.
Jin, Y., Chu, Y., Li, Y., 2000. Virus removal and transport in saturated and unsaturated
sand columns. Contam. Hydrol. 43 (2), 111128.
Kaiser, N., Liang, K., Maertens, M., Snyder, R., 2002. Biosand Household Water Filter
Evaluation 2001. Samaritans Purse Canada, Calgary, AB.
Lenton, R., Wright, A., 2004. Interim report on task force 7 on water and sanitation,
Millennium project, UNO, United Nations Development Group, New York.
Manz, D., 2007. Preparation of media for the biosand water: three layers system, AB
www.manzwaterinfo.ca/documents/calgary (accessed on 15.03.10.).
Mara, D.D., 2008. Water, sanitation and hygiene for the health of developing nations.
Public Health 117, 452456.
Momba, M.N.B., Makala, N., Zani, B., Brouckaert, B.M., 2005. Key causes of drinking
water quality failure in a rural small water supply of South Africa. In: Lehr, J.H.,
Keeley, J. (Eds.), Water Encyclopedia-Domestic, Municipal and Industrial Water
Supply and Waste Disposal. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 221227.
Murcott, S., 2002. Nepal Water Project 20012002. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 77 Massachusetts
Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Nam, T.K., Timmons, M.B., Montemagno, C.D., Tsukuda, S.M., 2000. Biolm characteristics as affected by sand size and location in uidized bed vessels. Aqua Eng.
22 (3), 213224.
Nemade, P.D., Kadam, A.M., Shankar, H.S., 2009. Removal of iron, arsenic and coliform bacteria from water by novel constructed soil lter system. Ecol. Eng. 35,
11521157.
Ngai, T.K.K., Shrestha, R.R., Dangol, B., Maharjan, M., Murcott, S.E., 2007. Design
for sustainable development-household drinking water lter for arsenic and
pathogen treatment in Nepal. Environ. Sci. Health: Part A 42 (12), 18791888.
Palmateer, G., Manz, D., McLnnis, R., Unger, S., Kwan, K.K., Dutka, B.J., 1999. Toxicant
and parasite challenge of Manz intermittently slow sand lter. Environ. Toxicol.
14 (2), 217225.
Pryor, M.J., Jacobs, E.P., Pillay, V.L., 1998. A low pressure ultraltration membrane
system for potable water supply to developing communities in South Africa.
Desalination 119 (13), 103111.
Shengji, X., Jun, N., Ruiping, L., Guibai, L., 2004. Study of drinking water treatment
by ultraltration of surface water and its application to China. Desalination 170
(1), 4147.
Sobsey, M.D., 2002. Managing Water in the Home: Accelerated Health Gains
from Improved Water Supply, Water, Sanitation and Health, Department of
Protection of the Human Environment. World Health Organization, Geneva,
pp. 170.
Stauber, C.E., Elliott, M.A., Koksal, F., Ortiz, G.M., Digiano, F.A., Sobsey, M.D., 2006.
Characterization of the biosand lter for E. coli reductions from household drinking water under controlled laboratory conditions and eld use conditions. Water
Sci. Technol. 54 (30), 17.
Swartz, C.D., 2000. Guidelines for the upgrading of existing small water treatment
plants, WRC report 738/1/00.
UN, 2006. The millenium development goals report 2006. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs DESA.
Varbanets, M.P., Zurbrugg, C., Swartz, C., Pronk, W., 2009. Decentralized systems for
potable water and the potential of membrane technology. Water Res. 43 (2),
245265.
Visscher, J.T., Paramasivam, R., Roman, A., Heijnen, H.A., 1987. Slow sand ltration for
community water supply, Technical paper series No. 24, for community water
supply and sanitation, The Hague, Netherlands.
WHO, 2004. Meeting the MDG Drinking Water and Sanitation Target: A Midterm
Assessment of Progress. World Health Organization and United Nations Childrens Fund.
Wohlsen, T., Bates, J., Vesey, G., Robinson, W.A., Katouli, M., 2006. Evaluation of the
methods for enumerating coliforms bacteria from water samples using precise
reference. Appl. Microbiol. 42 (4), 350356.