Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. cv-14-427
5,2A15
APPELLANTS
RESPONSES ORDERED.
APPELLEES
PER CURIAM
On January 23, 2015, the Appellants filed a nrotion for oral argument. In their
n)otioll, the Appellants request that the court schedule
tlrrcc jtrstices were r-rot able to attend the first oral argur-r1ent on Novenrber 20,2014.1
Appellants lurther contend that "Fornrer AssociatcJustice CliffHootnran recusccl fronr this
casc and was replaced
has cnded,
and
Corrrt. -f trstice Wood was not present at thc oral argunrent on Novenrbcr 20,2014."
Or-rJantrary 27 ,2015, the Appcllccs filcd thcir
re
.-i
17
a second
oral argument
as
unnecessary.
The Appellees assert that "special Justice McCorkindale was specifically appointed by the
Governor
as a
Justice
In their pleadings, the parties have taken competing positions regarding the justices
who will serve on this case. Accordingly, we direct the parties to advise this court by formal
response,
within thirry
days
regarding the justices r,vho preside over this case. See, e.g., Hill u. State,362 Ark.659,210
cv-14-427