Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petrofac
Pre-Read Notes
Training Services
Page 1 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Notes ........................................................................... 41
Training Services
Page 2 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Course Information
Course Overview
This course is designed to provide knowledge and experience in major emergency
management. For delegates who have actual or potential prospects of command,
the course provides the first stage in the process leading to formal competency
assessment. It is OPITO-approved and is based on Petrofac Training Services generic
offshore fixed platform, the Linda B.
Information concerning the Linda B platform can be found in the remainder of this
document.
Course Content
The programme focuses on:
Classroom lectures, case studies, discussions and desktop exercises on the
essential elements and underlying principles of emergency management.
An introduction to emergency management performance criteria.
Practical scenarios, performed in a custom-built simulator. As well as acting
as a member of the emergency team, or as an observer, each delegate has
the opportunity of acting as the emergency manager on at least two
occasions.
Briefing and debriefing sessions with a final appraisal of readiness for formal
assessment
Certification
OPITO-approved certification and a Petrofac Training Services appraisal
report will be issued on completion of the course.
Items to bring
Photographic ID.
Training Services
Page 3 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Page 4 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Control Room
Operator
Muster
Checker
Key Events
Logger
Radio
Operator
Monitors process
& makes PA
announcements
Liaises with
Muster Points,
records missing
& casualties
Notes
significant
events and
keeps main
checklist
Communicates
with ERRV,
Coastguard and
air and sea
assets.
Page 5 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Linda B Platform
Training Services
Page 6 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Page 7 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Major
Hazard
Possible Causes
-
Potential Consequences
restricted to initiating module
impairs escape ways to
muster points.
threatens integrity of TR
system.
Consult
Procedure
Number
Training Services
Failure of discharge
lines from oil meter
booster pumps.
Failure of LP flare
scrubber or
associated pipework.
Release of oil/oily
water and/or gas
from production
separators or
associated pipework.
Failure of pipework
to B2 oil metering
package.
Condensate and gas
release from
pipework
downstream of P2.
Failure of T1 glycol
absorber and
associated dried gas
line.
Page 8 of 44
6.2
6.6
6.8
6.9
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Major
Hazard
Possible Causes
Potential Consequences
Module B
Failure of a production
header.
Release of condensate
and gas from NGL
metering package and
associated lines.
Failure of gas export line
upstream of pig
receiver.
Dropped object onto
wellhead or flowline
during well services
operations.
6.2
6.2
6.8
Module C
Module D
Training Services
Page 9 of 44
Consult
Procedure
Number
6.3
6.6
6.8
6.9
6.3
6.8
Petrofac 2012
Major
Hazard
Module E
E
Module F
F
Module G
Petrofac
Possible Causes
Potential Consequences
Escalation to neighbouring
modules from either an
explosion or a jet fire
could lead to TR
impairment.
Low frequency of TR
impairment due to jet fires
Explosions ignited by a
source at the south end
would generate highest
overpressures.
6.2
6.2
6.8
Training Services
Consult
Procedure
Number
6.2
6.3
6.9
6.3
6.8
6.9
6.3
6.8
6.9
Page 10 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Major
Hazard
Module M
Possible Causes
Module Q
Potential Consequences
Consult
Procedure
Number
6.2
6.3
6.6
6.8
6.9
6.1
Helicopter crash or
refuelling accident
leading to fire
involving helifuel
tanks on Module G
roof
Incident confined to
helideck and module G
roof. Unlikely to impair TR.
6.4
Incident likely to be
restricted to helideck.
6.4
Q
Helideck
Petrofac
Helicopter Crash
Helideck
Other
Blowout
Training Services
Page 11 of 44
6.2
6.3
6.6
6.8
6.9
Petrofac 2012
Possible Causes
Potential Consequences
6.2
6.8
6.9
6.8
6.8
Major
Hazard
Below
topsides
shutdown
valves (in
the air gap
or at cellar
deck level
between sea
level and the
26m level
Petrofac
Consult
Procedure
Number
6.3
6.7
6.8
6.9
Pipeline Releases
Within the
500 meters
safety zone
Internal corrosion
Impact from
dropped load
Outside
modules B/F
6.2
6.3
6.8
6.9
Dropped Objects
Topside
modules
Subsea
Facilities
Training Services
Page 12 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Structural
Failure
Petrofac
Possible Causes
Potential Consequences
Ship collisions
includes all vessels
impacts. Vessels
include: Powered passing
vessels
Drifting passing
vessels
Dedicated vessels
(supply boats)
Fishing boats, DSV
and SBV
Fires and explosions
Ships collisions
Dropped objects
Material Failure
Foundation Failure
Loss of structural
integrity due to impact
forces.
Accidents leading to fires
and explosions (riser
ruptures).
Pre-emptive evacuations
of personnel possible in
some instances if
sufficient advance
warning
Outside
Modules B
& F on north
face of
platform
Within
module
Training Services
Source
concentration for
H2S approx 7000
ppm
Releases of H2S at
20000ppm from
stripping column in
modules B and F
Flame impingement on
critical structural members
particularly from risers
fires in the air gap.
Corrosion or fatigue
failure. Structure has low
reserve strength capacity.
Mud mound at jacket base
prevents scour. Low
probability of pile failure
during storm conditions
6.9
6.7
6.9
6.2
Consult
Procedure
Number
6.5
6.9
Page 13 of 44
6.2
6.3
6.8
6.3
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Appraisal Process
The appraisal process derives from the assessment criteria developed in the
aftermath of the Piper Alpha Inquiry, by a committee which consisted of
representatives from the regulating and advisory bodies such as OPITO, Oil & Gas
UK, the HSE, etc. and practising Emergency Managers from all areas of the industry.
The Assessment Criteria have been reviewed twice since their inception in 1992 and
now constitute a system of Major Emergency Management which is now accepted
worldwide.
OPITO Approved Major Emergencies Management Training will provide candidates
with formal training in command, control, communications and stress related
factors in the management of major emergencies.
Evaluation of delegates will be by continuous observation during a minimum of two
command centre simulations per delegate, at least one of which must be as the
Emergency Manager, each based around a major incident chosen from the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
You will also find yourself dealing with scenarios which will include a number of the
following events;
Injured personnel
Multiple casualties
Missing personnel
Loss of containment
Loss of communication
Loss of evacuation, muster points or temporary refuge
Stressed personnel
Extreme weather conditions
Loss of essential facilities
Loss of key personnel
Rapidly developing situation leading to information overload
Evacuation of the facility
Environmental concerns and effects
Following the training and evaluation the delegate will receive an OPITO Approved
Major Emergency Management certificate and a written analysis of any gaps (see
Appendix H for an example Appraisal Form) that exist in the delegates current
managerial knowledge and capabilities for commanding a major emergency. These
gaps should be met by further training and workplace drills and exercises, at their
companys discretion.
Training Services
Page 14 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Page 15 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Delegate Authority
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Training Services
Page 16 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Purpose
The purpose of this presentation is to indentify the types of emergency that can
occur; the potential for escalation and the resources that can be used to control and
mitigate the emergency.
The delegate shall also be shown how to take a strategic approach to emergency
management
Training Services
Page 17 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Outcomes
The course will encourage you to consider major emergencies that can occur and in
particular;
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Major emergency types and why safety regulations put the onus on
the operators to run their facilities safely.
The factors the emergency manager must consider within the incident
people, environment, plant, resources and support.
The managers responsibility for non-essential and responding
personnel both onsite and within specific distances of the incident.
Evaluating the potential for escalation and the resources that will be
required to deal with the evolving emergency.
The possibility of a rapidly escalating situation that could deteriorate
if not properly managed.
Incident Types
The regulatory and advisory bodies have identified under broad headings the types
of incidents that an emergency manager should be competent to handle. These
are:
Accommodation Fire
Helicopter Incident
Pipeline Incident
Loss of Stability
Within each type of incident there will be many contributing and peripheral factors
that require to be addressed by the emergency manager.
Let us consider one type of incident. An explosion has occurred in a process module.
What factors should the manager consider?
To conduct an accurate assessment of the facts he must adopt systematic
methodology. One method is to group the considerations under the following key
headings. People, Plant, Resources and Support.
Training Services
Page 18 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
People:
Is there a threat to the TR and if so how much TIME does the manager have
to implement a controlled, down manning of personnel or a full evacuation
of the installation?
Plant:
Has the process shutdown and if appropriate blown down and have all the
systems functioned correctly?
Have all ignition sources been eliminated, hot work permits withdrawn etc?
Is there any potential for any further escalation, e.g development of gas
clouds, fire or further explosions?
Resources:
Has the ERRV carried out a sea search around the installation and reported
back observations on the location and severity of the incident?
Support:
Training Services
Page 19 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Conclusion
Emergencies can happen at any time without warning and the emergency manager
and his team, if they are to cope competently, must be in a permanent state of
readiness.
The implementation of the appropriate Emergency Response Plan (ERP) is a core
responsibility of the installation manager. This topic is the subject of the next
chapter. Caution should be observed, however, as the emergency may have some
unique features that were not identified when the ERP was initially developed.
The competent manager will have prepared both his team and himself, by
conducting drills and exercises thereby developing confidence in their emergency
response ability and acquiring valuable knowledge and experience.
Training Services
Page 20 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Fire in Accommodation / TR
1.
2.
3.
TR conditions -
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Training Services
Ventilation off
Electrical supplies off
Fire and gas system information monitored
Fuel supplies off for running generators in TR
Fixed firefighting systems status: CO2, sprinklers.
ERRV
CRO/Radio Operator call lists
Aircraft with medical support.
Page 21 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
ERRV
CRO/Radio Operator call lists
Aircraft with medical support.
Training Services
Page 22 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
ERRV
CRO / Radio Operator call lists
Aircraft with medical support.
Training Services
Page 23 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
6. ERT and medic to be deployed early to support the helideck fire team.
7. First aiders to prepare hospital set up triage.
8. On scene conditions -
Training Services
Page 24 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Page 25 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Ship Collision
1. Confirm available data on rogue vessel.
2. Sound GPA Muster in TR.
3. Contact ERRV who will confirm - Marine data.
Plot of rogue vessel.
Provide CPA and time to CPA.
4. Consider Plant status?
5. Third parties contacted -
Training Services
Page 26 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
ERRV.
CRO/Radio Operator call lists.
Aircraft with medical support.
Training Services
Page 27 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Training Services
Page 28 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Assess the situation and formulate your plan before calling for a Time
Out.
2.
3.
4.
2.
3.
Situation description.
Potential/escalation path.
Plan.
Delegation of task.
Confirm understanding.
Remember:
A Time Out is for you to brief your team, not for the team to brief you.
Training Services
Page 29 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 30 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
State
potential
PEOPLE
PLANT
State plan
PEOPLE
PLANT
RESPONSE
SUPPORT
Delegate
Tasks
DOIM
CRO
RADIO OP
MUSTERS
KEY EVENTS
Training Services
Page 31 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 32 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Evacuation Checklist
1
Situation
Plan
Delegation
Tasks
Deputy O.I.M
Radio Op
Muster Co-ordinator
Confirm understanding
10
11
OIM Make final P.A for any missing persons, (if necessary)
12
13
14
OIM Inform ERRV that the command team are now leaving the installation
15
16
Training Services
Page 33 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 34 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 36 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
PHONETIC ALPHABET
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Training Services
ALPHA
BRAVO
CHARLIE
DELTA
ECHO
FOXTROT
GOLF
HOTEL
INDIA
JULIET
KILO
LIMA
MIKE
NOVEMBER
OSCAR
PAPA
QUEBEC
ROMEO
SIERRA
TANGO
UNIFORM
VICTOR
WHISKY
X-RAY
YANKEE
ZULU
Page 37 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 38 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Notes
Training Services
Page 39 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Notes
Training Services
Page 40 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Notes
Training Services
Page 41 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Notes
Training Services
Page 42 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Petrofac
Notes
Training Services
Page 43 of 44
Petrofac 2012
Training Services
Petrofac
Page 44 of 44
Petrofac 2012