20150208-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To MR TONY ABBOTT PM-Re The Alleged Vaccine Fraud-Etc

1
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr Tony Abbott PM
Cc:
10
8-2-2015
C/o josh.frydenberg.mp@aph.gov.au
Bill Shorten Bill.Shorten.MP@aph.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Senator George Brandis senator.brandis@aph.gov.au
Mr Clive Palmer Admin@PalmerUnited.com
Jacqui Lambie senator.ketter@aph.gov.au
James Campbell james.campbell@news.com.au
Ref; 20150208-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Tony Abbott PM-Re The alleged vaccine fraud-etc
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Tony,
Further to my 2-2-2015 correspondence regarding the health money pit I provide this
supplement.
It should be understood that generally a woman goes through a period of 40 weeks to feel a child
growing within her before giving birth. One therefore must not under estimate the horror and
devastation that can be inflicted upon a mother, as well as upon a father and others of course, if a
child dies. Governments have legislated for certain vaccinations and rely upon proper testing of
vaccinations by relevant companies, however, as the article reproduced below seems to indicate
for financial incentives companies may be willing to fraudulently distort the actual results
regardless of in the process likely the death of children or other health problems that may have
been avoidable. With trading agreements between numerous countries such testing fraud,
once perpetrated by this can result in harm to children in many countries around the
world.
Ordinary, it are the children who will outlive their parents and put them to rest in a grave and not
visa versa, but when one have this masterminded fraudulent testing and have children vaccinated
in a harmful manner then I view this may be considered equal as to deliberately conspired mass
murder, as well as a deliberate organised criminal conduct to defraud the many.
In my view the Commonwealth of Australia should take note to what is alleged in the quotation
below and possibly have a moratorium as to usage of vaccine, etc, which have been made
suspicious by the allegations as well as to conduct its own internal research if companies selling
particular items actually by independent testing have their product proved to be correct to what
the company originally and/or subsequently submitted. As such, children who are vaccinated are
tested both prior to and after the vaccination applied to them or given other medication if there is
an actual change within them corresponding to what was claimed to bed the change resulting by
the usage of the particular vaccination/product or that no such random testing show any
reliable results as claimed by the manufacturer(s).
In my view where the Commonwealth or for that any State/Territory pursues a vaccination or
other product to be provided to a person of whatever age and it turns out to be not just ineffective
but causes/resulted to harm of the person then I view it should be liable for the results and hence
it is essential that any person involved in testing the claims of health product manufacturers are
tested independently and without those testing having any connection whatsoever with an y
health product manufacturers as to avoid bias and contamination and even fraudulent results.
.
p1
8-2-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
10
2
Nothing in this writings must be considered that I express a support or an objection regarding
vaccinations and/or the use of other health product s but rather that I express my concerns as I
view any FAIR MINDED PERSON would do as to the allegations that were made, and how
this may also be relevant within the Commonwealth of Australia and so its States /Territories.
Consider that if your own child/grandchild was caused to suffer unduly because of the
greed of certain manufacturers having falsified their testing results and perhaps you ended
up seeing the demise of life in your child/grandchild, and having to burry your
child/grandchild, if not then you too would demand justice?
QUOTE
Evidence emerges that measles outbreaks are deliberate - see the

document
Shopping
15
NaturalNews
Today at 6:17 AM
me
To
Evidence emerges that measles outbreaks

are deliberately encouraged by Big Pharma
to ignite vaccine hysteria
p2
8-2-2015
Dear NaturalNews readers,

While mainstream media uses the measles outbreak to
destroy medical freedom and call for absolute obedience
to the vaccine industry, they still refuse to cover two
important stories:
CDC Whistleblower exposes cover-up to conceal MMR
vaccine links to autism and Merck whistleblowers expose
10 years of ongoing fraud, and falsification of data about
the efficacy of the MMR vaccine.
END QUOTE
http://www.naturalnews.com/048522_measles_outbreak_vaccine_hysteria_science_fraud.html
QUOTE
Evidence emerges that measles outbreaks are deliberately encouraged by Big Pharma
to ignite vaccine hysteria
Thursday, February 05, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: measles outbreak, vaccine hysteria, science fraud
10
15
20
Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/048522_measles_outbreak_vaccine_hysteria_science_fraud.html#ixzz3R3cuuWhr
(NaturalNews) While the mainstream media is busy making a mockery of itself with runaway hysteria "witch hunt"
hate speech against parents who choose not to poison their children with toxic vaccines, the real story on the
measles outbreak remains entirely unreported in any mainstream media outlet.
What story is that? The true story about how Big Pharma's own vaccine scientists blew the whistle on MMR vaccine
research fraud taking place over a decade ago, warning that the vaccine's approval by the FDA was based on
"falsified results" and that the fraudulent MMR vaccine was the "primary cause" of a measles outbreak in 2006, as
they state in their own words (see below).
25
The senior management of the world's top vaccine producer was actively engaged in the fraud, according to the
whistleblowers, even going so far as to test the vaccine against contrived "laboratory" strains of infectious viruses
rather than testing them against strains circulating in the real world. This created an MMR vaccine with results that
could be faked to appear effective while actually conferring almost no real-world protection at all, thereby ensuring an
eventual outbreak that the media would seize upon to call for more vaccines.
30
When these pro-vaccine scientists attempted to sound the alarm on the MMR vaccine research fraud they not only
witnessed but actually took part in carrying out, they were threatened with being arrested and sent to prison,
according to their own testimony.
Absolutely zero investigative reporting on the vaccine industry taking place today across
the entire national media
35
40
The sellout mainstream media, not surprisingly, refuses to cover this story in exactly the same way it refused to cover
the public confession of the CDC whistleblower scientist who went public with his own allegations of vaccine research
fraud at the CDC.
Any time you see a mainstream media news report on vaccines, you can rest assured with 100% confidence that it is
pure theater, carried out with carefully scripted fake narratives to achieve a propaganda goal of demanding complete
obedience to all demands of the vaccine industry. Media outlets now function as nothing more than propaganda
pushers for the medical fascism police state which has descended upon America.
p3
8-2-2015
4
Words from the False Claims Act
10
We now have new transcriptions from this document filed with the United States government, which reveals shocking
details about the vaccine fraud witnessed firsthand by Big Pharma's own scientists. The document is entitled United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Civil action No. 10-4374. "Complaint for Violations of the
Federal False Claims Act."
Here are the actual words of the vaccine whistleblowers as printed in the False Claims Act document filed with the
federal government. Subheads added are my own:
This case is about Merck's efforts for more than a decade to defraud the United States with respect to the efficacy of
Merck's mumps vaccine.
15
The FDA insists on such a high efficacy rate (95%) because only then can the disease ultimately be eradicated
through what is commonly referred to as "herd immunity."
Without demonstrating that its mumps vaccine continued to be 95% effective, Merck would lose its exclusive license
to manufacture and sell its MMRII vaccine.
20
Relators Krahling and Wlochowski participated on the team that conducted this supposedly enhanced test. Each of
them witnessed firsthand the falsification of the test data in which Merck engaged to reach its 95% efficacy threshold.
In fact, each was significantly pressured by Krah and other senior Merck personnel to participate in this fraud."
25
Merck added rabbit antibodies for the singular purpose of altering the outcome of the test by increasing the virus
neutralization count.
Without applying a proper "control" to the process, there is no way to isolate whether virus neutralization is caused by
the human antibodies alone or in combination with the rabbit's antibodies, Merck did not apply this kind of control.
30
And adding rabbit antibodies as a supplement to a vaccine was not an option because it could result in serious
complications to a human, even death.
p4
8-2-2015
5
"Merck's senior management" helped orchestrate the vaccine fraud
Krah did not act alone in orchestrating the falsification of Merck's mumps vaccine test results. He acted with the
authority and approval of Merck's senior management.
In July, Relator Krahling met with Alan Shaw, Merck's Executive Director of Vaccine Research and complained to him
about the fraudulent vaccine testing.
Shaw talked about the significant bonuses that Emini had promised to pay once the testing was complete.
10
Relator Krahling then met with Bob Suter, Krahling's human resources representative at Merck. Krahling told Suter
about the falsification of testing data and Shaw's refusal to get involved. Krahling told Suter that he was going to
report the activity to the FDA. Suter told him he would go to jail if he contacted the FDA and offered to set up a private
meeting with Emini where Krahling could discuss his concerns.
15
Emini agreed that Krah had misrepresented the data. Krahling also complained about the use of rabbit antibodies to
inflate the seroconversion rate. Emini responded that the rabbit antibodies were necessary for Merck to achieve the
project's objective.
"Destroyed evidence"
20
25
The next morning, Krah arrived early to the lab and packaged up and destroyed evidence of the ongoing Protocol 007
efficacy testing. This included garbage bags full of the experimental plates that would have (and should have) been
maintained for review until the testing was complete and final.
Despite the threats he received from Suter and Emini, Krahling called the FDA to report this activity and Merck's
ongoing fraud. On August 6, 2001, in response to Krahling's call, an FDA agent came to Merck to question Krah and
Shaw... And she did not address the actual destruction of evidence that Krah had already facilitated.
"Wide-scale falsification of test data"

What no one knew outside of Merck - - not the FDA, the CDC or any other governmental agency - - was that this
result was the product of Merck's improper use of rabbit antibodies and the wide-scale falsification of test data to
conceal the inflated seroconversion numbers these antibodies generated.
30
In 2005, the FDA granted Merck approval and an exclusive U.S. license for its ProQuad vaccine. Merck obtained the
license continuing to misrepresent the efficacy of its mumps vaccine.
35
Around the same time, the EMA also approved Sanofi Pasteur MSD's application for sale of Merck's ProQuad in
Europe. As with MMRVaxPro, Merck's joint venture submitted the falsified results of Protocol 007 to the EMA as
supportive clinical information in its vaccine application.
In 2006, more than 6,500 cases of mumps were reported in the Mid-West. This was the largest mumps outbreak in
almost twenty years...
40
The CDC, FDA and Merck publicly worked together to determine the cause of this 2006 outbreak. Of course, only
Merck knew that the primary cause was the insufficient efficacy of its vaccine.
Flawed vaccine is the primary cause of the outbreaks

45
50
55
60
The reason for these continued outbreaks is that Merck's vaccine docs not have a 95 percent efficacy rate. The
vaccine may have been 95 percent effective when it was originally licensed in 1967, but the vaccine virus has been
waning as it is continually "passaged"...
Without demonstrating that its mumps vaccine continued to be 95 percent effective, Merck would lose its exclusive
license to manufacture and sell its MMRII vaccine. And if Merck lost the license for MMRII, Merck would also be
unable to secure FDA approval for its ProQuad vaccine. So, Merck set out to conduct testing of its mumps vaccine
that would guarantee an efficacy rate of 95 percent or higher.
It did this through manipulating its testing procedures and falsifying the test results. Relators Krahling and Wlochowski
participated on the Merck team that conducted this testing and witnessed firsthand the fraud in which Merck engaged
to reach its desired results. Merck internally referred to the testing as Protocol 007. 25.
While Merck's PRN test was modeled after the efficacy test generally accepted in the industry, it diverged from this
"gold standard" test in a significant way. It did not test the vaccine for its ability to protect against a "wild-type" mumps
virus. A wild-type virus is a strain of the virus as it exists in nature and would confront a person in the real world. That
is the type of real-life virus against which vaccines are generally tested. Instead, Merck tested the children's blood for
its capacity to neutralise the same Jeryl Lynn mumps strain with which the children were vaccinated. The children's
vaccine response was not tested for its capacity to neutralize virulent, disease-causing mumps virus.
p5
8-2-2015
6
The use of the Jeryl Lynn strain, as opposed to a virulent wild-type strain, subverted the fundamental purpose of the
PRN test which was to measure the vaccine's ability to provide protection against a disease-causing mumps virus
that a child would actually face in real life. The end result of this deviation from foe accepted PRN gold standard test
was that Merck's test overstated thee vaccine's effectiveness.
"Falsification of the test data"

Merck's Improper Use of Rabbit Antibodies In 1ts "Enhanced" PRN Test
10
15
20
25
The second test Merck employed under Protocol 007 was formally called the Anti-IgQ Enhanced Mumps Plaque
Reduction Neutralization Assay. It was commenced in 2000 and again led by Krah and hia staff at Merck's West Point
facility. Relators Krahling and Wlochowski participated on the team that conducted this supposedly enhanced test.
Each of them witnessed firsthand the falsification of the test data in which Merck engaged to reach its 95 percent
efficacy threshold. In fact, each was significantly pressured by Krah and other senior Merck personnel to participate in
this fraud.
But the use of the rabbit antibodies allowed Merck to achieve its high seroconversion objectives. In fact, the exact
same paired blood samples that were found under Merck's original PRN test to lack sufficient virus neutralizing
antibodies were now considered seroconverted under the "enhanced" test. Indeed, in one panel of sixty paired blood
samples that had failed the original PRN test, Merck measured a seroconversion rate of 100 percent! ln other words,
non-neutralizing concentrations of antibodies that would never protect a child from mumps in the real world were
under Merck's "enhanced" test treated as vaccine successful solely because of the additional neutralization provided
by the rabbit antibodies.
Specifically, Krah and Yagodich and other members of Krah's staff falsified the test results to ensure a pre-positive
neutralization rate of below 10 percent. They did this by fabricating their plaque counts on the pre-vaccination blood
samples, counting plaques that were not actually there. With these inflated plaque counts, Merck was able to count
as pre-negative those blood samples that would have otherwise been counted as pre-positive because of the
increased neutralization caused by the rabbit antibodies.
"Falsification [was] broad-based and systematic..."

Merck's falsification of the pre- vaccination plaque counts was performed in a broad-based and systematic manner:
30
Krah stressed to his staff that that the high number of pre-positives they were finding was a problem that needed to
be fixed.
35
Krah directed his staff to re-check any sample found to be pre-positive to see if more plaques could be found to
convert the sample to a pre-negative.
Krah and Yagodicii falsified plaque counts to convert pre-positives to pre-negatives, and directed other staff scientists
to do the same.
40
45
Krah appointed Yagodich and two others to "audit" the testing that other staff scientists had performed. These audits
were limited to finding additional plaques on pre-positive samples thereby rendering them pre-negatives.
Krah instituted several measures to isolate the pre-positive samples, facilitate their "re-count" and consequent
conversion to pro-negatives, and minimize the chances of detection. Those included destroying test results,
substituting original counting sheets with "clean" sheets, and entering and changing test results directly onto
electronic (excel) spreadsheets that left no paper trail.
50
Merck cancelled a planned outsource of the efficacy testing to a lab in Ohio because the outside lab was
unable to replicate the seroconversion results Krah was obtaining in his lab. Krah and his staff conducted all
the testing instead.
55
Unsurprisingly, none of the "recounting" and "retesting" that Merck performed as part of its "enhanced' PRN testing
was performed on any post-vaccination samples or on any pro-vaccination samples that were pre-negative. This
additional "rigor" was only applied to the pre-positive samples, the very samples that were keeping Merck from
achieving the requisite 95 percent seroconversion threshold.
"A trillion to one"
60
In July 2001, Relators Krahling and Wlochowski conducted their own test to confirm statistically what they already
knew to be true. They reviewed approximately 20 percent of the data that Merck had collected as part of the
"enhanced" PRN test. In this sampling, they found that 45 percent of the pre-positive data had been altered to make it
pre-negative. No pre-negatives were changed to pre-positives. No post-positives were changed to post-negatives. No
post-negatives were changed to post-positives. All changes were in one direction - reducing the incidence of prepositives.
The statistical probability of so many innocent changes occurring in just the pre-positive data and in no other data
p6
8-2-2015
7
was more than a trillion to one. And that is a conservative measure given the likelihood that an even greater number
of pre-positives were changed but remained undetected because the changes were not recorded in Merck's files.
"Acted with the authority and approval of Merck's senior management"

The Complicity of Merck's Senior Management
5
Krah did not act alone in orchestrating the falsification of Merck's mumps vaccine test results. He acted with the
authority and approval of Merck's senior management.
10
15
20
25
In April 2001, for example, Emilio Emini, the Vice President of Merck's Vaccine Research Division, held a meeting
with Krah and his staff where he directed them to follow Krah's orders to ensure the "enhanced" PRN testing would
be successful. He also told the staff
Krah's orders to ensure the "enhanced" PRN testing would be successful. He also told the staff that they had earned
very large bonuses for their work so far on the project and that he was going to double the bonuses mid pay them
once the testing was complete.
In July 2001, Relator Krahling met with Alan Shaw, Merck's Executive Director of Vaccine Research, and complained
to him about the fraudulent vaccine testing. Krahling presumed that Shaw already knew about the fraud since he
visited Krah's lab frequently and almost certainly would have witnessed the changing of pre-positive data that Krah
was openly directing. Nevertheless, Krahling wanted to put Shaw on formal notice of the fraud end told him of the
falsification of the pre-positive data. He also complained about the improper use of the rabbit antibodies to inflate the
post-vaccine neutralization counts. Shaw responded that the FDA permitted the use of rabbit antibodies and that that
should be good enough for Krahling. Shaw refused to discuss anything further about the matter. Instead, Shaw talked
about the significant bonuses that Emini had promised to pay once the testing was complete.
Threatened with jail time

Relator Krahling then met with Bob Suter, Krahling's human resources representative at Merck. Krahling told Suter
about the falsification of testing data and Shaw's refusal to get involved. Krahling told Suter that he was going to
report the activity to the FDA. Suter told him he would go to jail if he contacted the FDA and offered to set up a private
meeting with Emini where Krahling could discuss his concerns.
30
35
40
Shortly thereafter, Emini agreed to meet with Krahling. Krahling brought to the meeting actual testing samples and
plaque counting sheets to demonstrate to Emini the fraudulent testing that Krah waa directing. Emini agreed that Krah
had misrepresented the data. Krahliug also complained about the use of rabbit antibodies to inflate the
seroconversion rate. Emini responded that the rabbit antibodies were necessary for Merck to achieve the project's
objective. Krahling proposed a scientific solution to lower the pre-positive rate and end the need to falsify data -- stop
using rabbit antibodies. When Emini declined, Krahling asked him what scientific rationale justified using the rabbit
antibodies. Rraini explained that Merck's choice to use these antibodies was a "business decision."
The next morning, Krah arrived early to the lab and packed up and destroyed evidence of the ongoing Protocol 007
efficacy testing. This included garbage bags full of the experimental plates that would have (and should have) been
maintained for review until the testing was complete and final. Despite the threats he received from Suter and Emini,
Krahling called the FDA to report this activity and Merck's ongoing fraud.
FDA overlooked the vaccine fraud

45
50
The FDA issued a one page deficiency report identifying a few relatively minor shortcomings in Merck's testing
process. These principally related to flaws in Merck's record-keeping and in its validation/explanation of changes to
the test data.
The report did not address nor censure Merck for any issues relating to Merck's improper use of rabbit antibodies or
Merck's wide-scale falsification of pre-positive test data. The FDA did not discover this fraudulent activity in the course
of their perfunctory visit because of Krah's and Shaw's misrepresentations to the FDA.
In order to comply with the deficiency report, Merck made minor adjustments to its testing procedure relating to its
heretofore ad hoc procedure for counting plaques.
"Wide-scale falsification of [vaccine] test data"

55
Merck completed its Project 007 testing in late summer or early fall 2001. Unsurprisingly, the results Merck reported
fell within the 95 percent seroconversion target Merck had from the outset. This is the result Merck provided the FDA
and the public at large. What no one knew outside of Merck - not the FDA, the CDC or any other governmental
agency -- was that this result was the product of Merck's improper use of rabbit antibodies and the wide-scale
falsification of test data to conceal the inflated seroconversion numbers these antibodies generated.
60
Click here to read the full False Claims Act document for yourself.
p7
8-2-2015
8
Click here for full-sized infographic.
More news on measles outbreak

5
85% of measles outbreak victims already received vaccinations

Measles outbreak likely caused by vaccinated children, science shows
Healthy, unvaccinated children denied equal rights to education
10
CDC lies: Measles outbreaks confirmed among children already vaccinated
Mainstream media wages vile campaign of hate speech against unvaccinated children
15
MMR measles vaccine clinical trial results FAKED by Big Pharma - shocking U.S. court documents
reveal all
Afraid of the Disneyland measles outbreak? Don't be fooled by Mickey Mouse science - READ THIS
FIRST
20
Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/048522_measles_outbreak_vaccine_hysteria_science_fraud.html#ixzz3R3d5giqF
END QUOTE
p8
8-2-2015
10
9
While I do not know nor have any reliable evidence to alleged the same fraudulent conduct is
practiced within the commonwealth of Australia, nevertheless I understand that for example
relating to tobacco manufacturers they were involved to conceal certain critical data and as such
one cannot ignore that this likewise may be practiced by other companies.
In my view this kind of conduct should be subject to special legislation that allows for the
confiscation of properties of those found to have been involved in manipulating test results and
other data, so that in the end those who are found to have been involved in such deplorable
conduct then will suffer the loss of whatever they own as a consequence and to avoid making this
kind of criminal conduct not to be profitable.
This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Our name is our motto!)
15
(
Awaiting your response,
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
p9
8-2-2015

20150208-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To MR TONY ABBOTT PM-Re The Alleged Vaccine Fraud-Etc

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20150208-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To MR TONY ABBOTT PM-Re The Alleged Vaccine Fraud-Etc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

Evidence emerges that measles outbreaks are deliberate - see the

Evidence emerges that measles outbreaks

Dear NaturalNews readers,

"Wide-scale falsification of test data"

Flawed vaccine is the primary cause of the outbreaks

"Falsification of the test data"

"Falsification [was] broad-based and systematic..."

"A trillion to one"

"Acted with the authority and approval of Merck's senior management"

Threatened with jail time

FDA overlooked the vaccine fraud

"Wide-scale falsification of [vaccine] test data"

More news on measles outbreak

85% of measles outbreak victims already received vaccinations

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

You might also like