Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C...)
w~ mj;
c-3
Refarm Now) ACORN Institute, Inc., and NEW YORK
-.-
j,A
-..-
=--.
L... .,.%
-.."!
ACORN HOUSING INC. ; ,. r7t u':...?
4.-
C
r\3
-..
,
,.. . ,,.,: :- !
'<.-:.<'.,.. ?
0 2 --
-v-..
. -..;''1
, ..-,
PMntita I
>J 0
, -g
3,
'
'. . -9
v. =
-3
cz3
r= :e
CZ
0
2 -.
F
UNFTED STATESof AMERICA et aL. X
m
and
&hphe$-Ea?k!%u&fai&%1e.593V~A~
- #28 1 BmoHya, Mew York 11238
(845) 901-6767 FJnlrit: Cuishsbvnkw~
~ ~ h ~ N m C I T , O F M m O N T o ~ ~ M A
RELATOR MTERVENER-DEPENDANT U.S.A. cIl3ZEN AM)
STATE OF NEW YORK C m N .
P L Q g $ E T A l B m ~ m * ~ t h e ~ ~ ~ d ~ g r i : ~
SH-Appearance, affirmed J~smwry20,2010 will move tbis Court to intervene ass e x - r e b
menerdef-t USA. Ci- rrnd ~ ~ ~ Y Cftficn o befort
r District
k Judge W i
Gershon st a time afforded by tbe Court if necessay at the United States Courthouse, at 225
~PlaeEaErrstBm~NewYork,mtfme:dhyandmoslthin201O,atatimtandcourbrrnnn
designated by the court,or as soon thereah as counsel can be heard.
B d y n , New York;
Email: chi-ws
Ce1I-845-90 1-6767
c w - E a r l :Sbunlr 8in eese
Darius Charney, Esq.
Center for Constitutional Rights
666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10012
Andrew Cuomo
New York State Attorney General
Office of Attorney General
120 Broadway 24th Floor
New York New York 10271
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------x Case No.: 09-cv-4888
Plaintiffs,
v.
Defendants
and
Ex-relator-Intervener-Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------------------x
-1-
2. Affirmant files this Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion to
Citizen and State of New York Citizen with FRCvP Rule 19(a) and 19(b).
Exhibit A) requesting permission to file with Local Rule (LR) 50.3.1(d), to which
request, and then on December 22, 2009 at the hearing before Judge Nina Gershon
Affirmant was instructed to submit a motion through the Court Clerk Pro Se Office
with particular attention to respond to the DOJ Response; that with LR 50.3.1(d)(2)
must be considered a Related Case matter with LR 50.3.1 (a) and (e)(2) (1) as filed
1
(a) “Related” Civil Case Defined. A civil case is “related” to another civil
case for purposes of this guideline when, because of the similarity of facts and
legal issues or because the cases arise from the same transactions or events, a
substantial saving of judicial resources is likely to result from assigning both cases
to the same judge and magistrate judge.
(e) Assignment of Related Cases. Cases which have been judicially
determined to be related shall be assigned by the clerk to the judge to whom was
assigned the case with the lowest docket number in the series of related cases. The
clerk shall advise the judge of such assignment of a related case. In the interest of
judicial economy, the following categories of civil cases shall be deemed to be
“related” without further order of the court: (1) all habeas corpus petitions filed by
the same petitioner; (2) all pro se civil actions filed by the same individual; …
-2-
by a Pro se litigant. In that Judge Nina Gershon was assigned Strunk v. United
to census tract effect upon federal funding for HUD projects under the 1990
FRCvP Rule 12 motion, and as related to the meritorious Bivens / State Action
injury complaint Strunk v. Department of Housing & Urban Dev’t, No. 99-CV-
6840 (NG/MDG) that was dismissed sua sponte for failure to comply with the
order to amend the complaint with Rule 8 without including any Brooklyn
55th AD, whose vendetta against Affirmant’s HUD housing project were essential
harmed in the process and despite efforts to rebuild economically, Affirmant was
then further injured as complained of in the related case Strunk v the New York
State Insurance Fund et al. EDNY 02-cv-1193 as a Bill of Pains and Penalty (Bill
-3-
from ever getting General Contractor insurance in the State of New York (a
which the entity owner / manager had no employees and Affirmant was a minority
stockholder involved as a DBA General sub-contractor who fully paid the State
Fund in the HUD project and historically for years of coverage; and that Affirmant
contends to this very day on the merits the HUD and State Insurance Fund cases
should have been heard as a Bills of Pains and Penalty matter as a State action
injury that if the premise for the preliminary injunction herein holds as a permanent
Plaintiff(s) herein directly involved with Defendant U.S. Housing and Urban
6. Further, every case Affirmant ever filed that went before Judge Nina
developed after the 1986 Savings and Loan collapse with the Resolution Trust
Corporation carried out a land grab in our community using then HUD Secretary
Andrew Cuomo’s plenary rules for Freddy and Fanny government backed
mortgages combined with Secretary Cuomo’s mandate after 1998 that NYC HPD
-4-
and NYC Housing Development Corporation divest a large number of hoarded
properties for an inside dealing relationship with Goldman Sachs whose partner in
such deals was Timothy Geithner then Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve
Bank, and in which the enterprise formed still dismantles real property in Bedford
Stuyvesant under the rubric of the Community Reinvestment Act that includes the
political dealing as unregistered lobbying agents against State Lobbying Law with
the 2008 State 18th Senate Campaign, requires close scrutiny by the State Attorney
General and or Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes in the lobbying and
other serious suffrage matters as was done by then Brooklyn District Attorney
Spargo is presently in prison) and Strunk v USPS et al. 08-3242-cv are both rooted
in the denial of equal treatment and substantive due process for individual rights
-5-
that challenge the appearance of mere privileges afforded by men not Almighty
Judge Richard J. Leon in the Washington District of Columbia with application for
two others as well; and additionally with two related original proceedings at DCD
Circuit, one of which awaits Affirmant’s motion for more specific proof as to 28
matter in New York State Supreme Court of Kings County case Strunk v Paterson
et al. with Index No.: 29642-08 active before the Honorable Supreme Court Justice
David I. Schmidt; and that awaits discovery in the DCD case 08-cv-2234, along
with response from the Defendant NYS BOE disregard of FOIL requests, and in
which State Action by Andrew Cuomo and ACORN et al. are subjects in the
Election. The States action affords Affirmant FRCvP Rule 19(b) Intervener-
Protective Order against potential reprisals in the 2008 General Election matter that
involves ACORN close dealing with the Brooklyn Democratic Party et al. and that
-6-
mysteriously the Transcript of the hearing has been lost by the Court Reporter
whose delay action is affirmed to in the loss matter (see Exhibit D).
State interest as to persons within such entities with the Benevolent Orders Law,
Corporation Law, Civil Rights Law Chapter 6 Article 5A among other New York
Lobbying Laws (2) apply to all state of New York government officials statewide
in every county, municipality, towns, and or villages with over 50,000 residents;
and that Affirmant contends ACORN et al. closely deal with the all too numerous
public benefit agencies and entities with unelected boards of directors that
circumvent citizen scrutiny over vast areas of governance and public policy.
14. That based upon direct observation during February 2007 Affirmant
contends that ACORN et al. by its agents are Lobbying State and Local
Government officials in violation of the New York State Lobbying Law and
with 18 USC 1964(c) and FCA, when a non-party right to intervene shows that:
2
(d) The term “organization” shall mean any corporation, company, foundation,
association, college as defined by section two of the education law, labor
organization, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, state agency or public
corporation.
-7-
a) Affirmant’s motion to intervene is timely filed by Local Rules as herein;
affiliation with SEIU and crony Eric Holder, who are all part of a
due process and oversight required under statutes including the RICO Act
that beyond the tame report issued by Representative Issa must also
the False Claims Act by obtaining government funds under false pretense
-8-
“Social Justice” organizations closely affiliated with the Holy See that
must be subjected to scrutiny with the Logan Act and related Foreign
affairs law (See Exhibit E) including but limited to those actions that
interfere with the domestic and foreign interest of the United States and
and moreover, not least of which actions under New York State law
to the foreign entity ACORN legal fiction per se, that in effect despite
as defined with 28 USC §1407 that belongs before a Judicial panel and
-9-
not before a single Judge as herein to the determent of Affirmant and all
U.S. Citizens and State Citizens of the several States affected by the oval
The New York Province of the Society of Jesus et al. DCD 09-cv-1249,
that the Usurper’s Attorney General and or his agents have not
and or any other State’s citizen of the several states accordingly, and as
Affirmative defense to the Complaint and counter claims have not been
16. That Affirmant contends that the Plaintiffs have failed to show it has
- 10 -
17. That Affirmant contends that an alleged Bill of Pains and Penalty /
Bill of Attainder injury, to be such, must inure to an in esse individual per se, and
that otherwise any legal fiction registered on a year by year basis by various fees
that only exists as a non-profit and or for profit entity at the pleasure of
government authority, and because only 3 of ACORN’s entities out of say 300 or
so shown in Plaintiffs Complaint exhibit (See Exhibit F) are alleged injured by the
Continuing Resolution and Minibus Bill, requires FRCvP Rule 12 applies as to:
• Rule 12 (b) (1) The Court lacks Jurisdiction over the subject matter as
administrative process has not been exhausted with the various Contracts;
• Rule 12 (b) (2) The Court lacks jurisdiction over the person without
necessary in esse injured persons joined;
• Rule 12 (b) (3) that due to the nature of the litigation and complexity 28
USC §1407 applies and as such there is improper venue;
• Rule 12 (b) (4) without an opportunity of other direct parties of interest
involved especially the New York State Attorney General and the various
attorneys general of the several States with authority over ACORN and
affiliates and SEIU, as such there is an insufficiency of process;
• Rule 12 (b) (6) without the proper parties and not having exhausted
administrative process plaintiffs fail to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted especially since with prior admission of wrong doing Plaintiffs
do not have clean hands contrary to clean hands doctrine the court lacks
jurisdiction; and
- 11 -
• To reiterate given the foregoing, as with Rule 12 (b)(7) Plaintiffs fail to join
a party under Rule 19.
19. The DOJ has violated FRCvP Rule 11(c)(1)(A) in that by combining
the single letter motion in opposition with the motion for Sanctions that “…shall
not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21 days after service of the
opposed the Affirmant in case Strunk v CIA et al. EDNY 08-cv-1196 who
righteously filed the FOIA request of the CIA for information on a Fr. Pierre
Teilhard De Chardin S.J. who had died in April 1955 who had been instrumental in
facilitating Mao’s genocide in China, and that Affirmant contends such records are
the case alleging Affirmant had not shown bad faith on the part of the CIA!
21. Further the Usurper’s choice for Attorney General, which Affirmant
contends is an action void ad initio as an active Quo Warranto Matter in the motion
before District Judge Richard J. Leon in DCD 08-cv-2234, Affirmant was injured
by Eric Holder directly and is hostile to Affirmant; and therefore, his agents, no
matter how great an assistant attorney general they may otherwise be, can’t
- 12 -
possibly represent my interests herein.
and Order, if the alleged Bill of Pains and Penalty were to inure directly to an in
esse individual per se associated with the Plaintiffs which is not proven or intended
by the Continuing Resolution or Minibus Bill, then as such would also apply to
Affirmant in the Strunk v the New York State Insurance Fund et al. EDNY 02-cv-
1193 State action matter dismissed sua sponte; and if Plaintiffs’ Counsels had
properly framed the Complaint with injured in esse parties the Court Decision
would also apply to Affirmant and warrants that case restoration to the calendar.
Assistant Counsel F. Franklin Amanat abuse of process in this court in his attempt
24. This case raises important legal and constitutional issues, the
resolution of which has the potential to affect not only the parties to this case but
of the issues in this case, but instead would be likely to distract both the Court and
the parties with frivolous and tendentious litigation over collateral and
- 13 -
25. I have read the foregoing abng with Plaintiffs' Complaint with
3
Exhibits and hereby oppose equity relief for Plaintiffs pursuant to ab&e
paragraphs 16 and 17, and have read all the subsequent responses and reply by
both sides and kno%the contents thereof, and effects those matters have upon me,
. I
:.*
and that this affidavr't is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein
be true. The grounds:of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and
belief are as follows: third parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
NOTARY PUBLIC
QEOROE ANbERSON
Netary Public, State of New Vkk
No. OlAN5070990
Qualified in Mngr County
Commission Expires Jan. 6,20 1 I
Christopher-Earl: Strunk In Esse DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A EX-RELATOR
INTERVENER-DEFENDANT U.S.A. CITIZEN AND
STATE OF NEW YORK CITIZEN.
Exhibit A
Case 1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB Document 23 Filed 12/16/09 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB Document 23 Filed 12/16/09 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB Document 23 Filed 12/16/09 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB Document 23 Filed 12/16/09 Page 4 of 4
\
Exhibit B
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Eastern District of New York
271 Cadman Plaza East
We write in response to the December 15 letter from Christopher Earl Strunk, a pro
se non-party to the above-referenced action, requesting a premotion conference in
connection with his planned motion for leave to intervene as a defendant in this action
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24.
We respectfully ask that the Court deny Strunk’s request for a premotion conference
on the ground that any motion that he might file seeking leave to intervene in this case
would not satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and would be subject to denial on that
ground. Alternatively, if the Court elects to proceed with the premotion conference, we ask
the Court to admonish Strunk that, even as a pro se litigant, he must comply with the
requirements of Rule 11 and is subject to sanctions if he fails to do so.
We likewise request that the Court bar Strunk from filing any motion in this case
without paying a plaintiff’s initiating filing fee, and that it correspondingly deny any
application for in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. As the Court is no doubt
aware, Strunk is a “frequent filer” in this and other federal courts, and the vast majority of his
proceedings have been dismissed as frivolous. PACER shows 31 cases involving Strunk in the
last ten years, nine of which have been in this District. In one recent case, Judge Ross
dismissed the bulk of Strunk’s claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), finding that the facts
alleged “rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible . . . and that there is no legal
theory on which he may rely.” Strunk v. CIA, No. 08-CV-1196 (ARR/LB) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27,
2008) (docket no. 4). See also Thomas v. Federal Reserve Bank, No. 07-CV-1171 (ARR/LB)
Honorable Nina Gershon
ACORN v. United States, No. 09-CV-4888 (NG/LB) (E.D.N.Y.)
December 21, 2009
Page 2
(E.D.N.Y. May 29, 2007) (dismissing Strunk’s complaint as frivolous and denying IFP status
for purposes of appeal); Strunk v. United States Postal Service, No. 08-CV-1744 (ARR/LB)
(E.D.N.Y. May 9 and June 13, 2008) (same); Strunk v. New York State Bd. of Elec., No. 08-CV-
4289 (ARR/LB) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2008) (same).
Indeed, your Honor repeatedly dismissed Strunk’s seriatim motions as frivolous, and
ultimately dismissed the complaint as devoid of merit, in Strunk v. United States House of
Representatives, No. 99-CV-2168 (NG/MDG) (E.D.N.Y. June 13, 2002). See also Strunk v.
Department of Housing & Urban Dev’t, No. 99-CV-6840 (NG/MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2001)
(sua sponte dismissing claims for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8). And at least one
judge of this Court has denied as frivolous motions by Strunk to intervene in cases to which
he was not a party. See, e.g., Torres v. New York State Bd. of Elec., No. 04-CV-1129 (JG/SMG)
(E.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2006) (denying motion to intervene, and subsequently (on Feb. 13, 2007),
denying IFP status for Strunk’s appeal); Green Party of New York State v. New York State Bd.
of Elec., No. 02-CV-6465 (JG/SMG) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2003) (same).
Permissive intervention is governed by Rule 24(b), which provides that, unless a right
to intervene is conditionally granted by federal statute, a court may not exercise its discretion
to permit a non-party to intervene in an action unless the non-party shows that its “claim or
defense . . . shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
24(b)(2). “The district court has broad discretion to deny an applicant’s motion for
intervention under Rule 24(b)(2).” Seils, 199 F.R.D. at 512 (citation omitted). In exercising
Honorable Nina Gershon
ACORN v. United States, No. 09-CV-4888 (NG/LB) (E.D.N.Y.)
December 21, 2009
Page 3
this discretion, the Court may consider “the nature and extent of the intervenor’s interests,
whether the intervenor’s participation will contribute to a just and equitable adjudication of
the issues, and whether the intervenor’s [interests] are adequately represented by the parties
of record.” Sharif v. New York State Educ. Dep’t, 709 F. Supp. 365, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
(citation omitted); Seils, 199 F.R.D. at 513.
This case raises important legal and constitutional issues, the resolution of which has
the potential to affect not only the parties to this case but many non-parties, as well. But not
all individuals claiming to be affected by, or interested in, the outcome of this case have a
right (or should be allowed) to participate in the case as a party. Strunk’s intervention, in
particular, should be rejected. It would not contribute to a just and equitable adjudication
of the issues in this case, but instead would be likely to distract both the Court and the
parties with frivolous and tendentious litigation over collateral and inconsequential matters.
Respectfully submitted,
Exhibit C
F A MaNJO &JUMO !$ddSMXl
ar(l JO no saum pneg uogeumadlll! lo hpwp!
* W U ( ~ pm pear* Jo =
s,=1 vlo!
-
- w mq - l =Is 'Jyuaq s! wF@d
q q n~ S,-huncx, q 1
G o- 8-q u! pntq
fD PUP1 W JOJ
P T W d U7aq Sey O\Ul- 1V
s~pmr w PIW wsTI p~ed*- =PI
'myp q uoddm 01*-arm Apmama s! pnuj J ~ A
"Uad-ul!lmq mase 'uaqzo %uoure '-1 q q
M N nU JO WolTpa w 'rcrlod ?w ~ ~ I ~ J O ~ I
14J)f!lu"
e s!q ~ 'awn q sum~ 3ql le s ~ o dxp le a t q m @ulr\q
fl) pampneuosladur! %q WA
-
a.p pue ~ o r e u o u d w ~
a q ~q u n .~4euouadur! J a w e Buypuaqudde
~o~-ar~pnonqru43iltuuu~~
nram;l~!nbuo~re~g~mqn UP-n xwap 01 pzpm
,OW &;IA p p &f! J! ~ 0 ~ ~ U i I a d ~
ne r a ~ o q pMXUQ s p g o w g q ~:uosea~q d
-q e loj s! s q Inq '4arum 01 p~erls!p n q lpnsJO
maprna m ! p mp aw s!11 - p a KJU sop X l d q
%u!llodq le "P"EIJ U O P W ~ ~ ! . m-q
h s s m u u n are mq qms q-~ pna~uor,s q q
-s@addv30 uno3 w=!3
W-%.ul4~~~"nm~!mFFPi~.kl~pldn
! oloqd m - J u =
mpba enelprrI JO ~ ! @ u o ~ n r p ; ~ ~
7ql~*uJl@q3=e't~~08~mww
-A pI;wo~3U! n
d @u> m m w!Un
Jo Unq) V '8002 '6 W
&SAoyDds UOA *VSUDH
8002 '01
ZZ 'ON
U O ~ ~ H W ~ ~ " ~
NO. 22 Legal memo ran dun^ March 10, 2008
1. Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd., Nos. 07-21 and 07-25 (U.S. Supreme Court, cen. granted Sept. 25,2007);2005
IND.LEGIS.S m . PL. 109;scc IND. CODE§§ 3-11-8-23.1(c),3-5-2-40.5. This voter ID law does not apply to those who are
over 65, disabled, or confined by illness or injury, all of whom may cast absentee ballots. See IND.CODE§§ 3-11-10-
24(a)(3)-(5).The law a h does nor apply LO individuals -who vore in person at a precinct polling place that is located at a
stare licensed care facility where the vorrr resides." Id. at § 3-11-8-25.1(e).
2. Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita, 458 E Supp. 2d 775 (S.D. Ind. 2006).
3. Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd., 472 E3d 949 (7th Cir. 2007).
4. The Court and Voter 1D5,N.Y. TIMES,Jan. 9, 2008.
5. Linda Greenhouse,Justic~sIndicate They May Uphold VoterID Rulcs, N.Y. IIMES, Jan. 10,2008. According to Mr. Smith,
-there's not a single recorded example of voter impersonation fraud.. .. ItS not happening and, indeed, every single indica-
tion in this record is that the evidence of this kind of fraud occumng, to call it scant is to overstate it." Transcript at 19-20.
Crawford v. hlarion County Election Bd., Nos. 07-21and 07-25 (U.S. Supreme Court, cert. granted Sept. 25.2007). avail-
able at h ~ ~ p ~ / ~ ~ ~ . s u p r e m e c o u ~ . g o v / o r a l ~ a r g u m e n t s / ~ e n t ~ t r a ~ ~ n p ~ O 7 - L 1 ~ p d f .
6. Press Release, Brooklyn, New York, District Attorney's OEfice, D.A. Holtzman Announces Grand Jury Report Disclosing
Systematic Voting Fraud in Brooklyn (Sepr. 5, 1984);In the Matter of Confidential Investigation, No. R84-11 (N.Y.
Supreme Court 1384) [hereinafter Grand Jury Report].
7. Frank Lynn, Boss hveed Is h e , But Not His Vole, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 9. 1984.
8 Id
9. District Attorney's Office,supra n. 6, at 1-2.
10. Grand Jury Repon, supra n. 6, at 2. Although the grand jury could not determine whether these illegal activities had
altered the outcome of those elecrions. it did find that the ourcome of at least one State Committee election in 1978 was
changed by fraudulent voting. Id.
11. Id.
NO. 22 Legal Memorandum March 10,2008
The Tools of Vote Fraud This process was also successful because of the
One of the key factors in the success of this way the Postal Service handled the mail. The nor-
scheme was the "advent of mail-in registration [in mal procedure of all election jurisdictions in the
New Yorkl in 1976 [which] made the creation of United States is to mail a voter registration card to a
bogus registration cards even easier and less subject newly registered voter after the reptration applica-
to detection."13 Congress mandated the same lype tion form has been received and processed.
of New York-style mail-in registration nationwide Although the primary purpose of the mailing is to
in 1993 with the passage of the National Voter Reg- provide the new voter with the voter registration
istration Act, thus ensuring that the security prob- card, it is also intended to ensure that a real person
lems caused by unsupervised mail-in registration in has registered and provided an accurate address.
New York were spread nationwide. In fact, accord- The New York Board of Elections thus relied on the
ing to the grand jury, "mail-in registration has Postal Service to return any registration cards that
become the principal means of perpetrating elec- were undeliverable because the registrant was ficti-
tion fraud" in New york.14 tious or did not live at the address on the applica-
t ion form. Election jurisdictions today still rely on
Another change in the law that increased fraud
the Postal Service for this validation.
was the new practice that allowed any organization
to obtain bulk quantities of voter registration forms However, the grand jury found that "mail carri-
from the Board of Elections h a t "contain no identi- ers did not return these cards particularly where
fyin serial number at the time they are given the address on the card was that of a large multiple
The conspirators obtained blank voter reg- dwelling.. .land] would frequently leave the unde-
istration carcls and then filled them out with ficti- liverable voter registration cards in a common area
tious first names and real last names taken from of the buildii~g."To take advan~ageof this, the
party enrollment books within the targeted voting conspirators used the addresses of multiple dwell-
~recinct: ings in which members of their crews lived, which
For example, if a John Brown actually lived at them the ability to collect the bogus registra-
1 Park Place, Brooklyn, New York, the tion cards." The Executive Director of the State
application would be completed in the name Board of Elections at he time, Thomas W Wallace,
of Mary Brown, 1 Park Place, Brooklyn, New commented that the handling of voter registration
York. It was anticipated that when the mail cards by the Postal Service varied greatly through-
for the fictitious Mary Brown was delivered to out the state and was a continuing problem for
John Broun at his address, John Brown election officials.l8
would discard the nolice rather than return it In addition to a voter's signature, New York's
to the post office. This plan reduced the voter registration application forms at that time
likelihood that the voter registration notice included a physical description of the voter-
card would be returned to the Board of something that is nonexistent on the mail-in voter
Elections. hereby mi~umiiingt l ~ e ~ i b d i t y registration applications used today. Even so, the
that the fraud would be detected.' vote-fraud conspirators avoided detection eilher by
I2. Id. at 3.
13. Id. at 11.
14. Id
15. Id. Without serial numbers, an election jurisdiction cannoL determine which organization may be responsible for problem-
atic or frdudulent registration forms that are received.
16. Id at 12.
17. Id. at 10-1 1.
18. Lynn,supra n. 7.
NO. 22 L e d Memorandum March 10, 2008
using their own physical descriptions or by provid- Moreover, the same witness had been present at
ing general descriptions that could be met by a meeting prior to elec~ion da that was
numerous people engaged in the scheme. ..attended by twenty crew chlefs.'"'lf the other
Thc fraudulent forms wcrc cithcr mailed or dcliv- crews averaged as many lraudulent votes, then
ered to the Board of Elections. often with a group of there would have been at least 2,000 phony
legitimate registrations. The grand jury reported votes cast in that election without detection by
that in one 1978 legislative race alone, 1,000 bogus precinct poll workers or election officials.
voter registration forms were successfull filed with- By 1982, the witness "was to have provided
out detection by the b a r d of Elections.' Although twenty-five workers to vote in a Congressional
New York law required a check at the polling place primary election again using bogus voter regis-
of the voter's signature, this proved to be no obstacle tration cards."22
to this fraud because the persons creating the ficti- In addition to voting in the names of fictitious
tious voter registration application forms would voters who had been successfully registered, the
later vote under the same names. so their signatures crews used several other methods of casting fraud-
at the polling place would match their signatures on ulent votes. One method involved voting under the
the original registration forms. names of legitimate voters. By reviewing the voter
These attempts to steal elections through the use registration records at the Board of Elections prior
of fraudulent voter registrations culminated each to election day, the conspirators were able to Find
election day with votes cast using the fictitious the names of newly registered voters. Using the
cards. One witness testified that he first partici- names of these voters, the crews would go to the
pated as a fraudulent voter when he was only 17. appropriate polling places as soon as the polls
voting in a legislative primary in 1968 "using a reg- opened in the morning to vote under those names:
istration card prepared under a different name by a The reasoning behind this method,
member of the local Democratic club.n20 according to the experience of one witness,
In 1970. the witness voted at least 10 times, at was that newly registered voters often do
10 different polling places, using bogus regis- not vote. By arriving at the polling sites
tration cards. He was part of a crew of five per- early. the bogus voter would not need to
sons, each of whom was paid $40 for the dayk worry about the possibility that the real
activities. voter had actually voted.23
In the 1972 Democratic primary election, he Another method e n d e d collecting, during
received a promotion to crew chief, running a nominating petition drives, the names of registered
crew of five members. voters who had died or moved. Members of the
By 1974, his crew had grown to eight members, various crews were then sent to polling places on
each of whom voted in excess of 20 times, and election day to vote in the names of those voters.
there were approximately 20 other crews oper- The signature requirement did not prevent such
ating during that election. fraudulent voting ei~lier,which points out the inad-
In 1976, the grand jury witness led a crew of equacy of signature matching (a highly trained skill
that cannot be taught in a matter of hours to the
five people who cast at least 100 fraudulent
average poll worker) to prevent this type of fraud.
votes. Credit cards present a similar problem, since the
signature requirement on credit cards does not pre- because someone had already cast a ballot in his
vent the ~ i ~ c avolume
n t of credit card Fraud that name at his polling place. He had no recourse at the
occurs in the United States. poll to find out "why his had occurred, whether
Database tcchnolog). is anothcr tool of thc rradc there was some error or whatever else, and the poll-
that was not available then but is widespread now. ing station iwlf didn't keep any record of it."25
Voter registration lists are public information in In a 2007 city council election in Hoboken. New
most states, and databases containing detailed Jersey, the former zoning board president noticed a
information on voters are available From a wide group of men near his polling place being given
variety of commercial vendors. index cards by two people shonly before the June
The databases of such commercial vendors are election. One of those men later entered the polling
usually much more up-to-date than the informa- place and triecl to vole in the name of another reg-
tion contained in Lhe voler registration databases istered voter who. it turned out, no longer lived in
maintained by election officials. This makes it very the ward. The imposter was caught only because he
easy for anyone with access to such information to happened to be challenged by the zoning board
determine the names of voters who are still regis- president. He admitled ro the police that the group
tered but who have died or moved out of a jurisdic- of men from a homeless shelter had been paid $10
tion. As Justice Roberts pointed out in the Indiana each to vote using others' names.16
voter ID case, the record in the litigation showed Last year, in a case reminiscen~of Boss Tweed
that 41.4 percent of the names on Indiana's voter and the Brooklyn grand jury report, the U.5.
registration rolls were bad entries, representing Department of Justice won a voting rights lawsuit
tens of thousands of ineli ible voters-a trove of in Noxubee, Mississippi, against a defendant
potential fraudulent votes.& named Ike Brown, as well as the county election
board.27 Brown, a convicted felon, was the head of
A Widespread Problem the local Democratic Party. He had set up a political
The widespread impersonation fraud that machine t h a ~worked to guarantee the election of
occurred in Brooklyn raises the question of his approved candidates to local office+sentiaUy
whether such fraud is a problem elsewhere in the his version of Tarnrnany Hall. One of the conten-
country today. More recent cases provide evidence tions in the litigation was that the local election
of what may be a wider problem that is very diffi- board's "failure to purge the voter registration roll
cult to detect in jurisdicrions that do not require to eliminate persons who have moved or died and
voter identification. who are thus no longer eligible voters" increased
For example, Dr. Robert Pastor, Executive Direc- the opportunity for voter fraud by creating "the
tor of the Baker-Carter Commission on Federal potential for persons to vote under others' names."
Election Reform and Director of the Center for The court cited the testimony of one of the govern-
Democracy and Election Management at American ment's witnesses, a former deputy sheriff. who said
University, testified before the U.S. Commission on that "he saw Ike Brown outside the door of the pre-
Civil Rights in 2006 that he was once unable to vote cinct talking lo a young black lady.. .and heard him
tell her to go in there and vote, to use any name, intended to prevent a fraudulent vote by an indi-
and that no one was going to say anything."2a vidual who not only had claimed to be a resident of
Mississippi does not require a photo ID for in- a stale other than Indiana, but also had actually
person voting, but it is now uncler court order to registered to vote there as well.30
implement such a requirement due to a federal case Unfortunately. attempts by neighboring states
filed by the Mississippi Democratic Party over its such as Kentucky and Tennessee to compare their
concern that the suteS open piirnaiy system and voter re@trauon lists Lor individuals registered iil
lack of party registration makes il unable to identlfy both states have been met with lawsuits contesting
non-Democrats and prevent them from voting in their right to do so.31 A federal court even issued
its primaries.29 This effort by the Mississippi Dem- an injunction barring the State of Washington from
ocratic Party is instructive because it discloses that refusing to regis~erindividuals whose application
threats to free, fair. and open elections concern not information (such as their residence address) does
only elective office and those who eventually hold not match infoinntion on that inditidual that is
them, but also the political parties as they recruit contained in other state databases, such as the
and organize voters and nominate heir candidates. Department of Licensing's (drivers licenses),
Political parties merit protection as much as indi- thereby making it extremely difficult for a state to
vidual voters whose franchise is diluted and denied verify the accuracy and validity of information
by the commission of fraud. being provided by an individual in an attempt to
The Indiana voter ID case itself also demon- register to vote.32
strates the problem of double voting by individuals One of the changes recommended by the New
who are illegally registered to vote in more than York grand jury to prevent problems caused by
one state. Because different states do not generally outside organizations filing fraudulent voter regis-
run database matching comparisons between their tration forms was "serializing and recording the
voter registration lists, there is no national process serial numbers of all voter registration cards dis-
by which to detect multiple registrations. One of tributed in bulk and insisting on greater account-
the Lndiana voters highlighted by the League of ability by organizations engaged in voter
Women Voters who supposedly could not vote due registration."33 A number of states have recently
to the voter ID law turned out to be registered to attempted to implement such requirements after
vote not just in Indiana, but also in Florida, where they received large numbers of fraudulent voter
she o ~ m 3s home and claimed a homestead exemp- registration forms, or received legitimate forms too
tion (which requires an individual to assert resi- late to be effective for an upcoming election, from
dency). She was not allowed to vote in Indiana third parties such as the Association o: Commu-
because she tried to use a Florida driver's license as nity Organiza~ionsfor Reform Now (ACORN).
her I k l e a r evidence h a t the law worked as These fraud-prevention rlki~rts, however, were
28. Brown, 494 E SWP. 2d at 486, n. 73. According to news accounts and sources in h e Justice Depamnent, in an apparent
attempt to intimidate this witness, a Noxubee deputy sheriff and political ally of Brown arrested the witness for disorderly
conduct and reckless drihlng only days after the government named him as a witness in a filing with the federal court. In
an unprecedented move, the federal judge stayed the county prosecution. See John Mott Coffey, Noxubee Voting Rights Trial
to Begin Ticesday, COMMERCWL DISPATCH,Jan. 13,2007;Bill Nichols, Voting Rights Act Pointed in a New Direclion, USA TODAY,
April 3,2006.
29. See Mississippi State Democratic Party v. Barbour, 491 F: SUPP.2d 641 (N.D.Miss. 2007).
30. Cindy Bevington, Voter Cited by Opponents ojlndianak ID Law Registered in Two States, EVENINGST* January 9, 2008.
31. See Stumbo v. Keniucky State Board of Elections, No. 06-(3-610 (Franklin Cir., Ky. OCL.2,2006).
32. See Washington Association of Churches v. Reed, 492 E Swr. 2d 1264 (W.D. Wash. 2006); see also Florida State Conf. of
NAACP v. Browning, No. 4:07CV-402 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 18, 2007). appeal filed Dec. 19, 2007.
33. Grand Jury Report, supra n. 6, at 22.
NO. 22 Legal Memorandum March 10.2008
halted by lawsuits filed by organizations such as Even though it led to no indictments, the New
Project Vote and the League of Women Voters that York investigation still serves a valuable purpose.
claimed that such requirements would impede Most clearly, it demonstrates that voter imperson-
their voter registration ation is a real problem and one that is nearly
Similarly, Ohio's attempt to improve third-party impossible for election officials to detect given the
voter registration was also struck down. The law weak tools usually at their disposal. Further, the
mandated training for individuals who assist appli- investigation provides good reason to believe that
cants in voter registration; required them to pro- this 14-year-long conspiracy to submit thousands
vide their name, signature, address, and employer (if not tens of thousands) of fraudulent votes in
on the voter registration form of each individual New York City could not have occurred if voters
they assist; and required them to return the forms had been required to present photo identification
directly to election officials rather than entrust when they voted.
them to a third party for delivery. Thezie proviisions New York's experience also demonstrata the fal-
were all enjoined as violations of the National Voter lacy of several arguments and assertions made by
Registration Act and the First and Fourteenth the petitioners' attorney, Paul Smith, in the Indiana
Amendments to the ~onstitution.~'Even if the case and by critics of voter ID in general. For exam-
court rulings w-er2 legally correct (a questionable ple, Smith told Chief Justice Roberts that imper-
conclusion), that is all the more reason for a state to sonation fraud is unlikely because it is not hard to
correct for potential fraud by requiring some form detect: "When you're going into the polls and say-
of reasonable voter ID at the polls. ing, I'm Joe Smith, you're dealing with a neighbor-
hood person who knows a lot of people who are
Lessons Learned there, you have to match that person's signature."38
There were no indictmen& issued by the New The idea that, in our mobile society today, all of
York grand jury as a result of its investigation the poll workers in a precinct will be "neighbor-
"because the statute of limitations had run out in hood" workers who know everyone in their pre-
some cases and because several of those involved cinct (even a small precinct) does not match reality.
were given immunity in return for t e ~ t i r n o n ~ . ' ' ~The
~ poll worker manual for the Board of Elections
Remarkably, [he fraud was apparently discovered for the City of New York states that polling places
only because of the actions of a former state senator, have only 750 registered vo~ers,~' yet the imper-
Vander L. Beatty, who was convicted of voter fraud sonation fraud that occurred in Brooklyn involving
and conspiracy. After Beatty lost the 1982 Demo- thousands of fraudulent votes went undetected for
cratic congressional primary election, some of his 14 years even in such relatively small precincts.
"supporters hid in the Brooklyn Board of Elections Many jurisdictions in other states and counties
office until after business hours and then made have much larger precincts, some of them contain-
some obvious forgeries of registration cards to cre- ing thousands of registered voters.
ate the appearance of irregularities" in order to give
Beatty the ability to challenge (unsuccessfully) the Contrary to Mr. Smith's claims, New York's sig-
winner of the primary election.37 nature requirement also did nothing to stop this
successful voter fraud conspiracy from casting
34.Szr: Projtxi Volt. v. Blacl\wcll, 455 E Sb-PP. 2cl69+ (N.D. Oluo 2006), Lrague oi\Vo~nerrVo~crbof Florida v. CULL,+S7 E
SUPP.2d 1314 (S.D. Fla. 2006).
35. Project Vote v. Blackwell, No. 1:06CV-1628(N.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2008).
36. Lynn, supra n. 7.
37. Id.
38. Transcripi in Crawford, supra n. 5, at 19.
39. N.Y. Bd. Of Elections, POLL WORKERSMANUAL2007 15, at ht~p://vote.nyc.nyus/pdVdocumen~s/bodpollworkers~
pollworkersmanual.pdl, page 15.
NO. 22 Lgd Memorandum March 10,2008
b o p s votes in person at polling places. The partic- In 1984. the New York grand jury recommended
ipants in the Brooklyn case impersonated newly that the governor and state legislature examine as a
registered, deceased, and moved voters by voting possible remedy "requiring identification from vot-
in their place for years without detec~ion. ers at the time of voting or regi~tration."~'In 2005,
the bipartisan Baker-Carter Commission on Fed-
Voter ID: A Sensible Solution eral Election Reform also recommended requiring
In recent elections, thousands of fraudulent voter photo ID for in-person voting because "[iln close or
registration forms have been detected by election offi- disputed elections, and there are many, a small
cials aU over the country. Given the minimal to non- amount of fraud could make rhe margin of diKer-
existent screening efforts engaged in by most election ence. And second, the perception of possible fraud
jurisdictions, there is no way to know how many contributes to low confidence in the system.n42
others slipped through. In states without identifica- Voters in nearly 100 democracies are required to
tion require men^, election officials have no way to present photo identlhcation to ensure the integrity
prevent bogus votes from being cast by unscrupulous of elections.43 Our southern neighbor, Mexico,
individuals based on fictitious voter registrations, by requires both a photo ID and a thumbprint. and
impersonators, or by noncitizens who are registered turnout has increased in its eleclions since this
to vote-another growing problem.40 This is a secu- requirement was implemented.34 If Mexico can
rity problem that requires a solution. implement a s~~ccessful photo ID program for its
As the New York voter fraud investigation and voters, there is no valid reason the United States
other cases illustrate, impersonation fraud does cannot do the same.
occur and can be difficult or impossible to detect.
As the grand jury in New York properly con-
States such as Indiana and Georgia have a legiti-
cluded at the end of ics investigation of a vote-fraud
mate and entirely reasonable interest in requiring
conspiracy that had been successfully carried out
voters to idenufy themselves when they vote in
without detection for 14 years, "The core of the
order to prevent impersonation fraud and voting
democratic process is the right of the people to
through the use of fraudulent voter registration
choose their representatives in fair elections. Fraud
forms. The Indiana case also demonstrates that
in the election process is into~erable."~~
voter identification can detect unlawful multiple
voter gistr rations by individuals in ddferent states. -Hans A. von Spahovsky served as a member of the
Finally, requiring a govemmenr-issued photo ID Federcll Election Commissionfor twoyears. Before that,
can prevent illegal aliens from voting (except in he was Counsel io the Assistani Attorney General for
states that issue driver's licenses to noncitizens). A Civil Rights at the U.S. Department oflwtice, where he
simple requirement that a voter demonstrate his
specialized in voting and election issues. He also served
authentic identity assures that free elections remain as a counfy election oficial in Georgiaforfive years us
n member of the Fulton County Registration and Elec-
untainted by fraud that undermines their fairness
and, in turn. disappoints the expectations of the
tion Board.
voting public
40. In just one Texas county, jury summonses led to the discovery that ar least 330 ille~alaliens were registered to vote and
that 41 had voted repeatedly "in more than a dozen local, state and federal elections between 2001 and (20071." Guillermo
X Garcia, Vote Fraud Probed in Bcxar, EXPRESSNnvs, June 8,2007.
41. Grand Jury Report, supra n. 6, at 2 1-22.
42. Commission on Federal Election Reform, B ~ ~ D M G
C~NFIDENCI: I N U.S. ELECTIONS 18, Sep~.2005
43. Id. at 5.
44. John R Lott, Jr., Evidence of Voter Fraud and the Irnpacl that REgulations ro Reduce Fraud Have on Voter Participation Rates,
August 18,20C%,pp. 2-3, at htcp~/~~.vore.caltech.edunioterID/ssm-id~2561l .pdi.
45. Grand Jury Report, slipra n. 6. at 3.
Christopher-Earl: Strunk In Esse DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A EX-RELATOR
INTERVENER-DEFENDANT U.S.A. CITIZEN AND
STATE OF NEW YORK CITIZEN.
Exhibit D
Christopher-Earl: Strunk In Esse DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A EX-RELATOR
INTERVENER-DEFENDANT U.S.A. CITIZEN AND
STATE OF NEW YORK CITIZEN.
Exhibit E
Left-Wing Radicalism in the Church:
The Catholic Campaign for Human Development
By Matthew Vadum
Summary: Each November around Thanks-
giving every Roman Catholic parish takes
up a collection for the nonprofit Catho-
lic Campaign for Human Development
(CCHD), a program run under the auspices
of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops (USCCB). Last November, under
intense pressure from Catholic parishioners,
CCHD finally stopped collecting money for
the fraud-ridden radical group ACORN.
But the Bishops’ Conference continues to
support other radical community activist
groups with similar goals, such as the In-
dustrial Areas Foundation (IAF) founded in
Chicago by Saul Alinsky, the founding fa-
ther of “community organizing.” President
Obama, a self-professed community orga-
nizer, has ties to both ACORN and CCHD.
I
t must have been a sad day at the offices
of the Catholic Campaign for Human De-
velopment (CCHD) in Washington, D.C.,
last year when the United States Conference
of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) announced that
its temporary suspension of funding for the
embattled radical group ACORN was being
made permanent.
Bishop Roger Morin announced last fall that CCHD was cutting off the corrupt group
CCHD is the grantmaking arm of USCCB, ACORN but as this year’s Thanksgiving collection approaches, the church’s charity
the 350-person Washington, D.C.-based or- continues to support similar radical community organizing groups.
ganization that acts on behalf of the nation’s Catholic bishops were coming under intense
Roman Catholic bishops, a group widely pressure from conservative Catholics who September 2009
assumed to be conservative defenders of were outraged by reports of gross legal and
traditional morality. However, CCHD and ethical improprieties involving ACORN. CONTENTS
ACORN share a left-wing sociopolitical
ideology that puts a premium on aggressive Founded in 1969, CCHD has given more Left-Wing Radicalism
community organizing – but more on that than $280 million over the years to fund in the Church
in a moment. what it calls over “7,800 low-income-led, Page 1
community-based projects that strengthen
After channeling $7.3 million of parishioners’ families, create jobs, build affordable hous- Philanthropy Notes
money to ACORN over the last decade, the ing, fight crime, and improve schools and Page 8
FoundationWatch
2 September 2009
FoundationWatch
Radical Goals Funding the Radical Left and Community is Paul Booth, a founder and former national
While CCHD poses as a mainstream Chris- Organizers secretary of Students for a Democratic Soci-
tian charity trying to help the poor, it uses CCHD reported distributing $10.2 million ety (SDS), now an aide to Gerald McEntee,
left-wing euphemisms in its mission state- for grants and projects in 2007, up from $9.7 president of the powerful public sector union
ment. It seeks to address “the root causes of million the year before. AFSCME
poverty in America through promotion and
support of community-controlled, self-help But not much of CCHD’s money over the According to the David Horowitz Freedom
organizations and through transformative years has actually gone to the poor. Almost Center, the Midwest Academy is an Alinsky-
education.” all of it has been disbursed to ACORN-like inspired school that teaches “radical activists
groups for political activities and commu- tactics of direct action, targeting, confronta-
ACORN’s mission statement, by compari- nity organizing – and many of those groups tion, and intimidation.” It describes itself as
son, is far more aggressive. Its “People’s “one of the nation’s oldest and best known
Platform,” is a manifesto for America’s schools for community organizations, citizen
downtrodden: organizations and individuals committed to
progressive social change.”
“But we have nothing to show for the
work of our hand, the tax of our labor. *People Improving Communities Through
Our patience has been abused; our ex- Organizing (PICO), was founded in 1972 by
perience misused. Our silence has been Father John Baumann, a Jesuit priest trained
seen as support. Our struggle has been in Alinsky’s techniques. The training school
ignored. Enough is enough. We will wait and activist group was originally called Pa-
no longer for the crumbs at America’s cific Institute for Community Organizations,
door. We will not be meek, but mighty. but five years ago it adopted its current name.
We will not starve on past promises, but It claims to have 53 affiliates in 17 states.
feast on future dreams.”
Also known as the PICO National Network,
CCHD’s website sells bumper sticks that say, the group describes its mission as trying to
“If you want peace, work for JUSTICE.” It’s “increase access to health care, improve pub-
a variation on the radical slogan “no justice, lic schools, make neighborhoods safer, build
no peace,” that Thomas Sowell notes “has affordable housing, redevelop communities,
been used to justify settling legal issues in Edward T. Chambers of the Industrial and revitalize democracy.” PICO also says,
the streets, instead of in courts of law.” Areas Foundation (IAF) “[W]e need to insure that new Americans
are welcomed and not exploited.”
CCHD’s 2007 annual report declares, have been founded or are run by Catholic
“Poverty is caused not simply by the lack priests. According to the group, “government can
of financial resources, but by the lack of play a vital role in improving society.” It
quality education, affordable housing, health Here are some select recipients of CCHD favors using “people of faith” to maximize
care, child care, fair wages, and vocational grants: “the potential for transformation – of people,
training.” In the same report, CCHD states institutions, and of our larger culture.” This
that it “supports programs that help poor and *Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, year it has worked with Sojourners and Faith-
low-income people to help themselves.” the mother of all community organizing ful America, which is a political arm of the
networks with dozens of affiliates nationwide National Council of Churches, to encourage
Indeed it does, if helping the poor consists (and affiliates in Canada, Germany, and the churchgoers to campaign for a government
of funding Alinsky-inspired poverty groups United Kingdom), has received plenty of takeover of the nation’s healthcare system.
to help themselves to taxpayer money. money over the years from CCHD. Alinsky
Here are some of the left-wing local groups referred to its training institute as a “school *Direct Action and Research Training
that received grants from CCHD in 2008: for professional radicals.” It has been headed Institute (DART) was created in 1982. It
Chinese Progressive Association; VOZ by ex-seminarian Edward T. Chambers since boasts 20 locally affiliated organizations in
Workers’ Rights Education Project; Texas Alinsky’s death in 1972. six states and claims to have trained more
Tenants’ Union Inc.; Border Network for than 10,000 community leaders and 150 pro-
Human Rights; Figueroa Corridor Coalition *The Midwest Academy founded by fessional community organizers. Academic
for Economic Justice; and Power U Center Heather and Paul Booth has been funded David Walls wrote that it “practices strictly
for Social Change. With names like these, by CCHD, according to Catholic writer congregation-based community organization
do these groups seem focused primarily on Paul Likoudis. IAF trained Heather Booth, [and]… conducts five-day orientation train-
helping the poor? the founder of a number of activist training ings for community leaders and has a four-
academies, including the Midwest Academy, month training program for organizers.”
Citizen Action and USAction. Her husband
September 2009 3
FoundationWatch
*Gamaliel Foundation, founded in 1968 in senior thesis at Wellesley on Alinsky. CCHD was a “funding mechanism for radi-
Chicago, says its mission is “to be a powerful cal left-wing political activism in the United
network of grassroots, interfaith, interracial, It has not been widely reported that CCHD States, rather than for traditional types of
multi-issue organizations working together has a longtime friend in the White House. Ac- charities.”
to create a more just and more democratic cording to “The Catholic Case for Obama,”
society.” Its executive director is Gregory a monograph published by a group called Catholic writer Paul Likoudis observes that
Galluzzo, a former Jesuit priest. Catholic Democrats, Barack Obama “re- CCHD could be considered “a political
ceived support in his community organizing mechanism bonding the American Church
Originally focused on helping low-income work for Chicago from the Archdiocese of to the welfare state.”
black Americans, Galluzzo changed its focus Chicago and the United States Conference
to community organizing when he took over of Catholic Bishops through the Campaign Likoudis wrote that CCHD was created in
in 1986. It is “refocusing its efforts on wider for Human Development.” (It is available at Saul Alinsky’s twilight years specifically to
metropolitan areas and assessing how to im- http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/cfo/pdf/ serve as a permanent funding mechanism
Catholic_Case_for_Obama_booklet.pdf.) for his Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF). In
turn, IAF’s “model of organizing religious
Candidate Obama himself acknowledged congregations into powerful local and re-
CCHD’s importance to his early career in gional networks has been taken up by three
community organizing in an October 2008 other groups – PICO, Gamaliel [Foundation],
interview with Catholic Digest: and DART – most of whose leaders got their
start with IAF,” according to David Walls of
“I got my start as a community organizer Sonoma State University.
working with mostly Catholic parishes
on the South Side of Chicago that were The connections between CCHD and Alinsky
struggling because the steel plants had were clarified in a March 2002 article in So-
closed. The Campaign for Human Devel- cial Policy, a journal of the ACORN-affiliated
opment helped fund the project, and so American Institute for Social Justice.
very early on, my career was intertwined
with the belief in social justice that is so While organizing in Chicago, Alinsky gained
strong in the Church.” many Catholic allies. He began working in
1938 for the Institute for Juvenile Research
From 1985 to 1988 Obama ran the CCHD- in Chicago, which worked with local leaders
funded Developing Communities Project to combat juvenile delinquency. While there,
(DCP) from an office located in Chicago’s Alinsky teamed up with Joseph Meegan, a
Holy Rosary Church. devout Catholic who was director of a local
recreation facility, to create the Back of the
Father John Baumann, founder
of People Improving Communities Obama has said he “tried to apply the precepts Yards Neighborhood Council.
Through Organizing (PICO) of compassion and care for the vulnerable
that are so central to Catholic teachings to “Among friends, he could be openly con-
pact national policy on immigration reform,” my work [such as in] making health care a temptuous about not only Catholic rituals but
according to Walls. As of last year, Gamaliel right for all Americans – I was the sponsor religious rituals in general,” wrote Sanford D.
reported having 60 affiliates in 21 states, as in the state legislature for the Bernardin Horwitt, an Alinsky biographer. But despite
well as affiliates in the United Kingdom and Amendment, named after Cardinal Bernar- his atheism Alinsky found common cause
South Africa. The group claims to represent din, a wonderful figure in Chicago I had the with religious leaders on political matters.
more than one million people. opportunity to work with who said that health
care should be a right.” Sometimes he invoked religious imagery
Gamaliel brags on its website about its and used salty language to make a point:
connection to President Obama. Obama The Alinsky Connection “I think that somebody who goes off in a
worked for the Developing Communities CCHD has long supported groups such as monastery and starts praying for the salvation
Project, which was a spinoff of the Calumet ACORN that engage in left-wing community of mankind and doesn’t do a damn thing but
Community Religious Conference, itself a organizing. sits there and prays, I think that when that
creation of several Chicago area Catholic guy comes up for judgment that the judge is
churches. In fact, it was created specifically to do so. going to sit there and say ‘why you cruddy
bastard.’”
The Obama Connection Former Treasury Secretary William E.
Both President Obama and his secretary Simon, a prominent Catholic layman who Alinsky concentrated his efforts on unions,
of state, Hillary Clinton, were inspired by served on the board of Capital Research while Meegan focused on churches and
Alinsky’s teachings. Clinton even wrote her Center, complained in the late 1980s that community groups. Meegan helped Alinsky
4 September 2009
FoundationWatch
ingratiate himself with the Chicago Archdio- What Made the Bishops De-Fund CCI, an affiliate of ACORN, “is where the
cese. His brother, Monsignor Peter Meegan, ACORN? shell game begins.”
served as Bishop Bernard Sheil’s secretary.
Over time Alinsky’s organizing efforts in the 1. Embezzlement “ACORN has over 200 different entities that
Back of the Yards, a section in the Southwest The embezzlement that led Bishop Morin the money gets moved around to - for this
Side of Chicago, gained the support of Bishop to announce that Catholics would no longer purpose to that purpose, this organization to
Sheil, a liberal who founded the national be making Thanksgiving-time contributions that organization,” said Turner. “We believe
Catholic Youth Organization. to ACORN organizations took place around the way the money has been moved around,
2000. The basic facts of the crime are not they’ve been laundering money.”
Alinsky also worked with Jack Egan, a in dispute.
student at Chicago’s Mundelein Seminary, Former ACORN officials say these activi-
who later became a crusading left-wing Dale Rathke, the brother of ACORN founder ties are controlled by the mysterious CCI,
priest. Monsignor Egan became an important Wade Rathke, stole $948,000 from the which is located in ACORN’s headquarters
Alinsky ally and a member of the board of ACORN network. When the theft was discov- in New Orleans. CCI handles the financial
Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF). ered, ACORN leaders refused to contact law affairs of hundreds of affiliates within the
He also went on later to play a significant role enforcement officials. Instead, they embraced ACORN network. ACORN member dues,
in the creation of CCHD and the Catholic an uncharacteristically libertarian approach government money, and foundation grants,
Committee on Urban Ministry (CCUM). to dispute resolution. are all sucked into the CCI vortex often never
to be seen again.
CCHD’s kinship with ACORN is further Wade Rathke, who had covered up his broth-
discussed in a March 2000 Sojourners maga- er’s action for eight years, called it a “mis- When the cover-up became public in the
zine article by Helene Slessarev, a professor appropriation,” and his senior colleagues at summer of 2008, Drummond Pike, the
of urban ministries at Claremont School of ACORN allowed the Rathke family to quietly founder of the far-left Tides Foundation,
Theology: and privately pay restitution at the meager stepped forward and paid off the debt using
rate of $30,000 per year. Observers note that his personal funds. Wade Rathke had been
“Congregation-based community or- it would have taken more than 30 years to pay a member of the board of the Tides Founda-
ganizing is the fastest growing form of off the debt. Throughout the eight years of the tion (2007 assets: $186 million), which has
organizing in the country, according to cover-up, Wade Rathke kept his brother on provided more than $400 million in grants
Doug Lawson of the Catholic Campaign the payroll as his $38,000 a year “assistant” to activist nonprofits since 2000.
for Human Development (CCHD). ‘No at ACORN headquarters.
one else approximates faith-based orga- ACORN concealed the embezzlement by
nizing,’ he says. The only non-faith-based Dale Rathke had previously served as a entering the missing funds as a loan to
organization that has built comparable senior official at Citizens Consulting Inc. an ACORN officer on the ledgers of CCI.
power is ACORN.” (CCI), the shadowy financial nerve center At the national ACORN board meeting in
of ACORN. As former ACORN national June last year, Wade Rathke told his fellow
Alinsky’s ideas about the aggressive use board member Charles Turner said earlier community organizers that he had to cover
of power are controversial within church this year on “The Glenn Beck Program,” up the embezzlement so the group’s right-
congregations, but Slessarev points out that
churches are excellent sites for organizing
angry and alienated people, a point not lost
on CCHD and ACORN.
September 2009 5
FoundationWatch
2. Partisanship
During last year’s Democratic Party prima-
ries, the Obama campaign paid $833,000
to Citizens Services Inc., another ACORN
affiliate, for get-out-the vote activities. Hav-
ing ACORN do the political work evidently
made sense to candidate Obama, who had
once led a voter drive for Project Vote, an
ACORN affiliate. Obama also represented
ACORN in court, and he had lectured at
ACORN on organizing techniques.
played in 120 cities, 43 states and the District community organizations so that you have “I’ve been a Catholic all my life and I’ve
of Columbia through a complex structure input into the agenda for the next presidency been a little disturbed it took them so long to
designed to conceal illegal activities, to use of the United States of America,” Senator realize what was happening with ACORN,”
taxpayer and tax-exempt dollars for partisan Obama said in December 2007. MonCrief said. “ACORN and its shenanigans
political purposes, and to distract investiga- have been in the news since 2000 and they
tors,” the report said. Structurally, it is “a It’s fortunate that Catholics noticed last year should have known.”
chess game in which senior management what was happening at ACORN. As their
is shielded from accountability by multiple parishes geared up for “second collections” Matthew Vadum is Editor of Foundation
layers of volunteers and compensated em- in November, Catholics throughout the nation Watch and Organization Trends. This article
ployees who serve as pawns to take the fall launched local boycotts of the CCHD col- is based on his article about CCHD and
for every bad act.” lection, according to a Nov. 26 Washington ACORN that was published in the April 2009
Times report. edition of Catholic World Report. It also
The report examines the ACORN network’s relies upon DiscoverTheNetworks.org, the
abusive interlocking directorates, and claims Parishioners at Queen of Apostles Church online encyclopedia of the left maintained
that the group deliberately organized itself to in Alexandria, Virginia, were informed in by the David Horowitz Freedom Center,
escape legal and public scrutiny. “ACORN the church bulletin that in the 1990s the “The Legacy of CHD: a critical report and
hides behind a paper wall of nonprofit CCHD had given money “to organiza- analysis of the U.S. Bishops’ Campaign for
corporate protections to conceal a criminal tions diametrically opposed to the Catholic Human Development,” a monograph by
conspiracy on the part of its directors, to Church, i.e. the pro-abortion group National Paul Likoudis that was published in 1996
launder federal money in order to pursue a Organization for Women and the American by the Wanderer Press, and Let Them Call
partisan political agenda and to manipulate Civil Liberties Union.” Me Rebel: Saul Alinsky, his life and legacy,
the American electorate.” by Sanford D. Horwitt, published in 1989
“There are so many tremendous Catholic by Knopf.
What Took CCHD So Long? apostolates that work with the poor that are
ACORN misbehavior is well-documented in need,” read the bulletin item written by the
and it’s been going on for years. The group Rev. Thomas Vander Woude. “One wonders
choreographs sit-ins to force banks to lend if one’s donations could be better spent else- FW
to high-risk borrowers. It buses schoolchil- where until the CCHD has proven its ability
dren to the nation’s capital to demonstrate to fund truly Catholic apostolates that truly
against tax cuts. It sends mobs to shout down work with and help the poor?”
conservative speakers. It raises the dead and
leads them to voting booths. During a Sunday homily at St. Mary’s
Church, also in Alexandria, Rev. John De-
It’s strange that only in 2008 did CCHD Celles told his congregation, “I personally
get around to noticing that ACORN was haven’t given a dime to the Campaign for Please consider contributing
crooked. CCHD director Ralph McCloud Human Development in years.”
told Catholic News Service he knew some early in this calendar year to
of CCHD’s past ACORN funding must have Some Catholics were apparently inspired by the Capital Research Center.
gone for voter registration. “But by the same a blog post written by the late Rev. Richard
token, we didn’t find any voter registration John Neuhaus, the editor of the journal
We need your help in the
irregularities, the allegations we are finding First Things. Father Neuhaus wrote that the
now.” collection for CCHD was “misbegotten in current difficult economic
concept and corrupt in practice, [and] should, climate to continue our im-
A massive dose of bad publicity crippled at long last, be terminated.” He added that portant research.
ACORN fundraising. Ironically, it has come a decade ago the CCHD was “exposed as
during a recession just as the people that using the Catholic Church as a milk cow to
ACORN claims to help are most in need of fund organizations that frequently were ac- Your contribution to advance
real assistance, and it comes at a time when tively working against the Church’s mission, our watchdog work is deeply
ACORN’s good friend has made it to the especially in their support of pro-abortion appreciated.
White House. As a candidate for president, activities and politicians.”
Barack Obama promised the friends of
ACORN that they were on his call list: Anita MonCrief, a Washington, D.C. area Many thanks.
Catholic and former ACORN employee who
“Before I even get inaugurated, during the personally witnessed ACORN abuses from
transition, we’re going to be calling all of you the inside, told Catholic World Report that
Terrence Scanlon
in to help us shape the agenda. We’re going to she was delighted that CCHD finally came President
be having meetings all across the country with to its senses.
September 2009 7
FoundationWatch
PhilanthropyNotes
New York Senate Republican leader Dean Skelos criticized a federal government program that allows a $35 million
matching grant from George Soros and the Open Society Institute to clear the way for New York state to access an
additional $140 million in federal economic stimulus funding. Under the program 813,000 poor children will each receive
$200 in back-to-school shopping money. Skelos says the hand-out is “ripe for fraud and abuse.” The $175 million is “a
helicopter drop of cash” that will have a negligible impact on the economy, added E.J. McMahon, director of the Empire
Center for New York State Policy, part of the Manhattan Institute.
The William J. Clinton Foundation plans to construct the world’s largest solar power generating station in an Indian
desert near the Pakistani border. Indian officials said the foundation has signed a memorandum of understanding to move
forward with a facility with a generating capacity of 5,000 megawatts. The Clinton Foundation reportedly has $12 billion in
backing from companies such as GE Energy and Microsoft.
California Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, a former community organizer, told the Los Angeles Times that support for lim-
ited government is tantamount to terrorism. Lawmakers in a state budget fight “were essentially threatened and terrorized
against voting for revenue,” Bass said. “Now [some] are facing recalls. They operate under a terrorist threat: ‘You vote for
revenue and your career is over.’ I don’t know why we allow that kind of terrorism to exist.” Bass founded a local group in
South L.A. called the Community Coalition.
The Catholic News Agency reports that Catholic Charities USA has been awarded a five-year contract by the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Administration for Children and Families (ACF) section. Under
the $100 million agreement, the charitable group will render disaster aid nationwide. Although CCUSA has long received
federal funding in the form of government grants, Roger Conner, a spokesman for the group, said that this is the first
contract CCUSA has ever had with the federal government in its 100-year history.
Patients United Now, a project of Americans for Prosperity Foundation, is now running an effective TV ad opposing
a proposed government takeover of healthcare. It features Canadian brain tumor patient Shona Holmes who was told by
Canada’s dysfunctional government-run healthcare system that she would have to wait for six months to see a specialist.
“In six months I would have died,” Holmes says in the spot. She received successful treatment in the U.S. at the Mayo
Clinic.
President Obama plans to nominate healthcare investor and Democratic Party fundraiser Alan Solomont, current chair-
man of the Corporation for National and Community Service, to be U.S. ambassador to Spain and Andorra. CNCS
oversees the AmeriCorps program. In June, the CNCS inspector general, recently fired by President Obama, issued a
blistering report criticizing CNCS grants, and the House Appropriations Committee cut the administration’s 2010 budget
request for the agency, citing its many managerial failings. Solomont has been a member of the CNCS board since 2000.
“What’s bad for America is good for Goldman Sachs,” writes Terry Keenan, anchor of “Cashin’ In,” a Fox News Chan-
nel show about investing. The bank makes big money selling and trading federal, state, and local debt and as one of
the largest primary dealers in U.S. Treasurys it “has a huge vested interest in the United States digging a deeper and
deeper hole.” Goldman forecasts the U.S. will borrow a record $3.25 trillion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, which
is quadruple the total borrowed last year, Keenan writes in a New York Post op-ed. Its biggest competitors in the debt
world, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, are defunct. That leaves Goldman as the “major toll collector on Washing-
ton’s red-ink railroad,” she writes. “To put it bluntly, Goldman Sachs is a play on the bankrupting of America – the more
we borrow, the more they make.”
Conservative pundit Ben Stein said he was recently relieved of his fortnightly column in the Sunday New York Times in
part because he criticized Goldman. One of the things Stein did was make a “new set of antagonists by repeatedly and
in detail criticizing the real power in this country, the ‘investment bank’ Goldman Sachs, for what seemed to me ques-
tionable behavior,” he wrote in the American Spectator.
8 September 2009
\\\\
Exhibit F
Case 1 :09-cv-OW-NG -LB Document 1-7 Filed W 2/09 .Page 1 1 of 27
Attachment 2
ACORN Bridgeport, CT
ACORN Hartford, CT
ACORN Waterbury, CT
ACORN HOUSING CORPOMTION Bridgepo* CT
ACORN HOUSmG COWOMTION New Haven, CT
ACORN 408 East 8th St. WiImingtnn, DE
ACORN Ft, Lauderdale, FL
ACORN =aieab, FL
ACORN Jacksonville, E
ACORN Lake Worth, FL
ACORNMiami, FL
ACORN Orlando, EL
ACORN St. Petenburg, FI,
ACORN d o the Progressive Center Tallahassee, FL
ACORN Tampa, FL
ACORN HOUSING CURPOUTION Miami, 1;L.
ACORN HOUSING COXPORATXON Orlando, FJL
Floridians For A11 Miami, FE
ACORN Atlanta, GA
ACORN HOUSING CORfOIL4TION Atlanta, GA
ACORN Honolulu, HT
ACORN Chicago, IL
ACORN Springfield, IIL
ACORN HOUSJNG COWORA.TION Chicago, EL
ACORN ROUSING CORPORATION of TL
SEW LOCAL 880 Chicago, IL
SEIU LOCAL S 80 East St. Louis, IL
SEIU LOCAL 880 Harvey, IL
SEW LOCAL. 880 Peoria, IL
S E N LOCAL 880 Rock Island, TL
SEN LOCAL 880 Springfield, I L
ACORN Indianapolis, IN
ACORN IA
Peace and Social Justice Center of South Central Kansas Wichita, I S
ACORN buimille, KY
ACQRN Baltimore, MI3
ACORN Hyattsville, MD
ACORN HOUSING CORPORATION Baltimm MD
ACORN Detroit, MI
ACORN HOUSING CORPORATION Detroit, MI
Edison Neighborhood Center Kalamazoo, MI
ACORN St. Paul, MN
ACORN HOUSING CORPOLU'ION St. Paul, MN
ACORN Financia1 Justice Center St. Paul, MN
ACORN Kansas City, MO
ACORN St. Louis, MO
Case 1 :09-cv-04888-NG -LB Document 1-7 Filed 3.M12109 Page 14 of 27
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
'On January 20,2010, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, declare &d certify under penalty of perjury
pursuant to 28 USC 51746,
That I caused the service of Three (3) copies of the Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Notice of
Motion and Amdavit in support of the notice of motion to intervene as a ex-relator intervener-
defendant U.S.A. Citizen'and State of New York Citizen affirmed January 20,2010, and that each
set was placed in a sealed folder properly addressed with proper postage for United States Postal
Service Delivery by mail upon:
-: ,- C>
Furthermore, Declarant provided ernail notice to the following parties-in-interest: - c 5
-j7 t
.s-'
-3i-(r EL