Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H00114083
This document contains a report on
forced convection around a
cylindrical copper rod of diameter
0.0125 m
Forced
Covection
Thermo lab Report
INTRODUCTION
This report covers the heat transfer rate from a cylindrical copper rod to the
surrounding air moving at a certain fixed velocity in an isolated system. Besides
showing how the heat transfer rate is affected by varying the velocity of air in
the isolated system this experimental lab report also shows the calculations for
Reynolds number, Nusselt number, as well as the film heat transfer coefficient.
Moreover, it covers brief discussion on the comparison of the experimental
values of K and n from the below equation with that of their literature values.
Nu=K n
In this experiment the heat transfer rate associated with the cross flow of air
across a cylindrical copper rod at various velocities has been investigated. The
aim of the experiment is to determine the heat transfer characteristics of a
cylinder under cross flow forced convection conditions when the cylinder is
isolated. The following equation is used to plot the graph and hence the slope of
the graph was used to calculate the estimated heat transfer coefficient .
ln T Ta
A
t ln T0 Ta
mC p
report can hence be used as reference when designing a car radiator with copper
metal for ambient temperature of 23C.
Fig. a
3
RESULTS
4
Given Data:
T a=23 C
Ambient Temperature
m=0.21 kg
C p =0.38 kJ /kg . K
A=0.00404 m2
b=12.5 cm
h=12.5 cm
d=1.25 cm
Recorded Data:
Time(s)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
Temp @
v=3m/s(C
)
97.0
97.0
92.7
92.7
88.6
88.6
87.1
87.1
82.0
82.0
79.1
79.1
77.1
77.1
74.2
74.2
72.4
72.4
70.4
70.4
68.3
68.3
66.4
66.4
Temp @
v=5m/s(C
)
97.0
97.0
91.9
88.2
86.8
81.1
81.1
77.3
76.5
73.2
72.3
69.3
68.7
66.0
66.0
63.0
62.5
60.3
60.3
57.4
57.4
55.5
55.5
53.3
Temp @
v=7m/s(C
)
97.0
97.0
95.9
89.1
89.1
81.4
81.4
76.0
76.0
71.5
71.5
67.6
67.6
64.1
64.1
61.1
61.1
58.1
58.1
55.4
55.4
53.6
53.6
51.2
5
Temp @
v=9m/s(C
)
97.0
96.1
90.9
90.9
83.9
83.9
78.0
78.0
72.9
72.9
68.8
68.8
65.0
65.0
61.6
61.6
58.4
58.4
56.0
56.0
53.0
53.0
51.2
51.2
Temp @
v=11m/s(
C)
97.0
97.0
91.6
91.6
83.5
83.5
78.0
76.9
71.4
71.4
66.8
66.8
62.9
62.9
60.2
60.2
56.7
56.7
54.5
54.5
51.4
51.4
49.7
49.7
120
64.6
Calculated Data @
Time(s)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
53.3
51.2
49.1
T-Ta (C)
Ln(T-Ta)
74
74
69.7
69.7
65.6
65.6
64.1
62.1
59.0
59.0
56.1
56.1
54.1
54.1
51.2
51.2
49.4
49.4
47.4
47.4
45.3
45.3
43.4
43.4
41.6
4.304065
4.304065
4.2442
4.2442
4.183576
4.183576
4.160444
4.128746
4.077537
4.077537
4.027136
4.027136
3.990834
3.990834
3.93574
3.93574
3.89995
3.89995
3.858622
3.858622
3.813307
3.813307
3.770459
3.770459
3.7281
u=3 m/ s
Temp T @
v=3m/s(C
)
97.0
97.0
92.7
92.7
88.6
88.6
87.1
87.1
82.0
82.0
79.1
79.1
77.1
77.1
74.2
74.2
72.4
72.4
70.4
70.4
68.3
68.3
66.4
66.4
64.6
Ambient
Temp Ta
(C)
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
Calculations:
@u=3 m/ s
u=3 m/ s
v=
u
3
=
=3.33
0.9 0.9
=18.3808 Pa . s
a=1.17656 kg/m3
47.6
d=0.0125 m
b=0.125 m
h=0.125 m
k =0.0259 W /(m . K )
3=
Slope of graph 1 m C p
A
3=94.8 W /(m 2 . K)
Similarly,
5=150.12W /(m2 . K )
7=167.9 W /(m2 . K )
9=169.87 W /( m2 . K)
2
11=185.67 W /(m . K )
Nusselt number , Nu=
Nu 3=
d
k
94.8 0.0125
=46
0.0259
Similarly,
@u=5,7, 9,11
Nu5=73
Nu 7=82
Nu 9=83
Nu 11=90
a v d
3=
Similarly,
@u=5,7, 9,11
5=4445
7 =6315
9 =8119
11 =9924
Prandlt Number,
Pr=
Cp
k
Pr=0.27
Graphical Calculations:
Ln (T-Ta) vs t
5
4.5
f(x) = - 0x + 4.3
ln [T-Ta]
ln ()T-Ta
3.5
3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time
GRAPH #1
(T-Ta) vs t
80
70
60
50
T-Ta
[T-Ta]
40
Exponential ([T-Ta])
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time
GRAPH #2
120
140
Nu vs Re
Nusselt number
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2000
Power ()
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Reynolds number
GRAPH #3
Values from Graphical Equations:
From Graph #1: Slope = - 0.0048
Nu=K
Where,
K=1.5066 ,
n=0.4462
DISCUSSION
The Correlation literature value for
'k'
K=1.15
n=0.5
Error Analysis for
and
values:
10
Nu=K
Error =
Error for K =
Error for n=
1.50661.15
100=31
1.15
0.44620.5
100=10.7
0.5
and n , we find
Nu
theoretical
Reynolds Number (
Nusselt Number ( Nu )
2667
59
4445
77
6315
91
8119
103
11
9924
114
11
Nu
vs.
we get,
Nu vs Re
120
100
80
Nusselt number
Nu
60
Power (Nu )
40
20
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Reynold number
GRAPH #4
Comparing the graph #3 and graph #4:
According to the graphical power equations the experimental values of
and
' n'
'K'
may have occurred due to some errors during the experiment. Some of these
errors are discussed below. The graph below shows the comparison of
experimental values against the literature value. The experimental graph line is
slight deviated below the literature value line which shows that the Nusselt
number is lower of the experimental value as compared to that of the literature
vales. This deviation is mainly due to the errors occurred while performing the
experiment. But taking into consideration the error % values the graph shows
fairly little deviation.
12
120
f(x) = 1.16 x^0.5
100
f(x) = 0.98 x^0.5
80
Nusselt number
Nu literature
60
40
Power (Nu)
20
0
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Reynolds number
GRAPH #5
Possible errors during the experiment:
Varying ambient temperature
Slow digital thermocouple
Timing calculation while using the stopwatch
Varying wind speed from the air duct
CONCLUSION
The experimental results were almost as expected. Error % for the calculations
was less. This experiment shows how the heat transfer rate changes under the
circumstances of forced convection. In conclusion to the experimental result the
following points can be noted:
1.
2.
3.
4.
REFERENCE
1. Lienhard, J.H, IV & Lienhard, J.H. V, A Heat Transfer Textbook, 4th Ed,
Cambridge, MA, Phlogiston Press, 2011. (A Free Electronic Textbook)
2. Berndt Wischnewski. (2011). Air Calculator. Available:
http://www.peacesoftware.de/einigewerte/calc_luft.php5. Last accessed 20th oct
2013.
3. http://www.egr.msu.edu/~somerton/Nusselt/i/i_a/i_a_3_(ii)/i_a_3_(ii).htm
l
13