Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supriya Gupta
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
Abstract
The stability of single layer power-law fluid past a deformable solid for the couette flow configuration is studied
in this work. The solid is modelled by neo-Hookean model which is incompressible and impermeable to the fluid. The
linear stability analysis is carried for creeping flow limit to understand that how the nonlinear properties of solid play
roles in these elastohydrodynamic instabilities. The key dimensionless parameters governing the problem are imposed
shear rate, a solid-to-fluid thickness ratio, an interfacial tension, and a power-law index. It is observed that the imposed
shear rate and the power-law index are strongly coupled to the first normal stress difference which exists in the nonlinear neo-Hookean solid model and is absent for a linear viscoelastic solid model. For thick solids, shear-thinning
has a lower critical shear rate. For thin solids, the trend is reversed; here shear thinning fluids require a higher shear
rate to excite instability. In this work, it is observed that this instability can be suppressed with power-law fluids for
certain values of n. These results are potentially of interest for enhancing mixing in microfluidic devices and
understanding the rheology of worm-like micelle solutions.
Keywords: Elastohydrodynamic instability; Shear-thinning fluids; neo-Hookean; Linear stability analysis.
1. Introduction
Boundary Conditions
As the bottom plate is stationary so the solid
remains in the reference configuration:
x|z=H = X|z=H .
(2.7)
(2.8)
(2.9)
(2.10)
Equation of continuity
[ v ] = 0.
(2.1)
(2.2)
= pf +
1
m (2
(n1)
2
(2.3)
= 2 [(tr )2 tr( )2 ].
1
(n1)
2
m (2 )
(2.4)
(2.5)
(2.6)
4. Numerical Methods
We solved this eigenvalue problem in MATLAB.
There are two fourth-order differential equations
for the fluid layer and for solid layer. We used the
fourth-order Runge-Kutta integrator with
adaptive size control to obtain the solution.
5. Results and Conclusion
An interfacial tension value of zero is used in
most of the cases and for some cases 10 and
otherwise mentioned. We have represented our
results for various values of thickness ratio. The
two distinct ranges are in our study: thin solids,
where H < 1 and thick solids, where H >> 1.
For all calculations presented here, we have used
m = 1.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Figure.3. Critical value of imposed shear rate, c , as a
function of the thickness ratio, H, when T=0, for different
values of n. Re=0, n= 0.8, 1, 1.3.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my supervisor for his
guidance.
16.