You are on page 1of 1

Administrative Law

Arellano University School of Law


aiza ebina/2015

MAKATI STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. vs SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


14 SCRA 620
Scope of Powers of Administrative Agencies
Express and Implied Powers
FACTS: The Securities and Exchange Commission, in its resolution, denied the Makati Stock Exchange
permission to operate a stock exchange unless it agreed not to list for trading on its board, securities
already listed in the Manila Stock Exchange.
Objecting to the requirement, Makati Stock Exchange, Inc. contends that the Commission has no power to
impose it and that anyway, it is illegal, discriminatory and unjust. The Commission's order or resolution
would make impossible, for all practical purposes, for the Makati Stock Exchange to operate, usch that its
"permission" amounted to a "prohibition."
ISSUE: Whether or not the SEC has the authority to promulgate the rule in question
RULING: No. The Commission cites no provision of law expressly supporting its rule against double listing.
It suggests that the power is 'necessary for the execution of the functions vested in it.' It argues that said
rule was approved by the Department Head before the War and it is not in conflict with the provisions of
the Securities Act. The approval of the Department, by itself, adds no weight in a judicial litigation.
The test is not whether the Act forbids the Commission from imposing a prohibition but whether it
empowers the Commission to prohibit.
The Commission possesses no power to impose the condition of the rule which results in discrimination
and violation of constitutional rights. It is fundamental that an administrative officer has such powers as
expressly granted to him by statute, and those necessarily implied in the exercise thereof. Accordingly, the
license of the Makati Stock Exchange is approved without such condition against double listing.
RATIO: It is fundamental that an administrative officer has only such powers as are expressly granted to
him by the statute, and those necessarily implied in the exercise thereof.
---

You might also like