Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1
1.2
1.3
Definitions
Newtonian Fluids
Bingham Fluids
Power Law Fluids
The Modified Power Law
Model Affects on Viscous Flow
1.4
Mud Rheology
1.5
1.6
Laminar Flow
Turbulent Flow
Determination of Flow Type
Derivation of Effective Viscosity
Determination of Reynolds Number
Determination of Annular Velocity
Use of Reynolds Number to determine Flow Type
Determination of Critical Velocity
1.7
1.8
Hydraulics Optimization
a. Bit Hydraulic Horsepower
b. Hydraulic Impact Force
c. Optimization
1.9
1.10
Appendix
The importance of the drilling mud in the drilling of a well cannot be over emphasised. It
has a critical bearing on all aspects of the operation. Not only does it act as a transporting
medium for cuttings and gas, enabling us to see at surface what is happening downhole,
but the properties of the mud will determine how affective the drilling is, how well the
hole and formations are protected, and how well subsurface pressure are controlled.
Cuttings removal
Control subsurface pressures
Lubricate and cool the drill bit and the drillstring
Bottom hole cleaning
Aid in formation evaluation
Protect formation productivity
Aid formation stability
Cuttings removal
This is a very important role of the mud. Not only do the cuttings need to be removed
from the annulus to allow for free movement and rotation of the drillstring, but the
cuttings need to reach the surface in such a condition that they can be used by a geologist
to accurately interprete the downhole geology.
This principle is not only determined by the physical properties of the mud but by the type
of flow pattern present in the annulus. The cuttings need to be removed affectively, but
damage and erosion to the cuttings has to be avoided.
Cuttings density is obviously greater than the mud density, therefore it is normal for a
degree of cuttings slip. Mud properties (viscosity, gel strength) have to be such so as to
minimise this.
Cuttings slip will be affected by the annular velocities:If annular velocities are restricted for any reason (eg pump volume, large hole section,
downhole conditions), mud properties would have to be changed to compensate for an
increased degree of slip.
The pressure produced at the bottom of the hole, due to the weight of the static vertical
column of mud, is known as the Hydrostatic Pressure.
If the hydrostatic pressure is equal to the formation pressure, the well is said to be at
balance.
If the hydrostatic pressure is greater than the formation pressure, the well is said to be
overbalanced and protected against influxes into the wellbore.
If the hydrostatic pressure is less than the formation pressure, the well is said to be
underbalanced and therefore subject to influxes of formation fluid.
where
where
= SG
PHYD = psi
TVD = feet
where
= kg/m3
PHYD = Kpa
TVD = m
To obtain the best possible cuttings for geological analysis (viscosity). The type of
flow will determine the degree of erosion and alteration, thus smooth laminar flow is
preferred to chaotic turbulent flow.
To minimise fluid invasion (filtrate) - both water and oil invasion would affect the
resistivity of the mud making formation evaluations more difficult. Thus, a filter cake
is allowed to build up on the wall of the borehole, restricting fluid movement in both
directions.
NB
Filter Cake restricts fluid invasion but may reduce the quality of sidewall cores
Formation Stability
2. Native Water - water allowed to react with formations containing shales/clays; the
mud will therefore build up a solids content and density naturally.
5. KCL/Polymer -
disadvantages -
Emulsion Muds
Water is the continuous phase, oil the dispersed phase (normally 5 - 10%)
Oil added to increase ROP, reduce filter loss, improve lubrication, reduce drag and torque
The majority of hydraulic parameters are, first of all, dependent on what type of fluid the
drilling mud is and therefore which model is used for the calculations.
The categories are determined by the fluid behaviour when it is subjected to an applied
force (shear stress). Precisely, in terms of fluid behaviour, we are concerned with:
Once movement has been initiated, what is the nature of the fluid movement (Shear
Rate).
1.3a Definitions:
Shear Rate.....in a simple flow, is the change in fluid velocity divided by the width of the
channel through which the fluid is moving.
v2
Shear Rate = v2 - v1
()
h
h
= sec-1
v1
At wellsite, the Shear Rate is determined by the rotational speed of the Fann Viscometer
in which the tests are conducted.
Thus, Shear Stress is recorded at rotational speeds of 600 (shear rate = 1022 sec-1), 300
(shear rate = 511 sec-1), 200, 100, 6 and 3 rpm.
Shear Stress....is the force per unit area required to move a fluid at a given shear rate.
Area
= lb. ft
in2
or
lb. ft or
100ft2
dynes
cm2
The shear stresses recorded for each of the shear rates at the different rotational speeds of
the viscometer can then be plotted to produce an overall behaviour profile across the
rheological spectrum:-
Shear
Stress
lb/100ft2
100
200
300
400
500
600
Fluid Viscosity.....is the fluids shear stress divided by the corresponding shear rate.
Fluid Viscosity (
) = Shear Stress
Shear Rate
= dynes/cm2
sec-1
= poise
1 poise
= 47886 cP
The fluid will begin to move the instant that shear stress is applied. Thereafter, the
degree of movement is proportional to the stress applied...
ie
A linear relationship exists between Shear Stress () and Shear Rate ().
gradient =
where = viscosity
Most drilling fluids and cement slurries, however, exhibit non-Newtonian behaviour
where the laminar flow relationship between shear stress and shear rate is non-linear.
These fluids also require a certain amount of shear stress to initiate flow and thereafter,
require additional stress to be applied as the shear rate increases.
The level of shear stress required to initiate fluid flow is known as the fluids Yield Point.
Two main models have been used as a standard in the oil industry:1.
2.
In recent years, it is generally accepted that both models have merit but that the Power
Law Model is more applicable to the majority of fluids.
A third, widely used, model has been developed, being a combination of both previous
models. This model is known as the Modified Power Law (also known as the Yield
Power Law or Herschel-Bulkley Model).
Dial
Reading
600
gradient = PV
300
YP
(rpm)
300
600
= YP + .PV
PV = 600 - 300
YP = 300 - PV = 0
The Bingham Plastic Model represents, fairly well, the behaviour exhibited by fluids such
as bentonite slurries, class G cements and low gravity oils. A typical Bingham fluid will
have high viscosity but no gel strength.
For more complex fluids, however, the Bingham model is subject to error. Whereas the
Bingham model simulates fluid behaviour in the high shear rate range (300 to 600 rpm), it
is generally inaccurate in the low shear range. Shear stresses measured at high shear rates
are usually poor indicators of fluid behaviour at low shear rates, the area of interest for
simulating annular flow behaviour. Subject to this error, the calculated Yield Point will
tend to result in calculated pressure losses and equivalent circulating densities that are
larger than those actually observed.
The Power Law Model assumes that fluid movement will be initiated immediately that
any shield stress is applied. The model then predicts that fluids will exhibit a non linear
relationship between and and introduces two index values in order to determine the
relationship.
Dial
Reading
600
300
300
(rpm)
600
100
10
K
1
10
100
= K ()n
1000
log
(units lb / 100ft2 )
K = 5.11 300
(511)n
The Power Law rheological model better fits the behaviour of most fluids, especially
polymer based fluids, than the Bingham Plastic Model.
Fluids that follow this model have no shear stress when the shear rate is zero. The draw
back here, is that most fluids have a yield stress but this cannot be accounted for in this
model.
Similar to the Bingham Plastic model, but to a lesser degree, the Power Law model
accurately predicts fluid behaviour at high shear rates but shows a degree of error at the
lower shear rates.
The result of this is that annular pressure losses and ECDs are under-predicted by this
models calculations.
In many cases, however, the Power Law Model does closely approximate fluid properties
even when calculated from the high shear rate values.
Different values of n are possible, depending on which shear stress/rate pairings are
used in the calculation. Thus, this model can be applied by using data from a range of
annular shear rates, providing a better accuracy in predicting drilling fluid performance.
With 6 and 3
K = 100 / (170.3)n
K = 3 / (5.11)n
In the extreme case, when n=1, the fluid will become a Newtonian fluid
ie = K
to more accurately describe the suspension and hole cleaning potential of a fluid
in large diameter holes
in horizontal drilling applications
Shear
Stress
Shear Rate
= 0 + K ()n
where K = consistency index
n = flow behaviour index
The value 0 is the fluids yield point at zero shear rate and, in theory, is identicle to the
Bingham Plastic yield point, though its calculated value is different.
When n = 1,
0 = 0,
The model works well for both water based and oil based drilling muds because both
exhibit shear thinning behaviour and have a shear stress at zero shear rate.
The problem with the model is that the determination of n, K and 0 is very complex.
Shear
Stress
Bingham Plastic
Modified P.Law
Power Law
Newtonian
Shear Rate
NOTE, in order for the QLOG system to accurately calculate realtime hydraulics,
the Shear Rate values need to be updated regularly in the Equipment Table.
The data can be entered in any of the 3 standard shear rate pairings
ie
The industry normal is to use the 600/300 pairing but as was seen in this manual, there
are applications when the 6/3 pairing can be more meaningful.
Ideally, if there is a reason for using the 6/3 pairing, it should be discussed and confirmed
with the drilling and mud engineers.
Areas of
High Shear
n=1
n = 0.6
n = 0.2
Funnel Viscosity
This is a direct measurement from the Funnel (as opposed to Fann) viscometer and is
measured in secs/qt. Generally used at wellsite for immediate measurements, this is
simply the length of time it takes for one quart of fluid to pass through the funnel.
It is not regarded as being applicable to the analysis of circulating performance.
Apparent Viscosity - simply 600/2
Yield Point
The yield point, or yield stress, of a fluid is a measure of the attractive forces between
mud particles resulting from the presence of +ve and -ve charges on the particle surfaces.
It is a measure of the forces that cause mud to gel once it is motionless and affects the
carrying capacity of the mud. In other words, it is the strength of the fluid capable of
supporting a certain particle weight or size.
Normal unit of measurement is the Imperial
lb
100ft2
Gel Strength
The ability of the mud to develop and retain a gel structure. It is analogous to shear
strength and defines the ability of the mud to hold solids in suspension.
More simply, it describes the thickness of a mud that has been motionless for a period of
time (unlike viscosity which describes the mud thickness when in motion).
It is a measure of the thickening property of a fluid and is a function of time.
Measurements are therefore conducted after periods of 10 seconds and 10 minutes.
lb
100ft2
With the duration of a drilling operation, ie the age of a drilling fluid, viscosity
and gel strengths will both tend to increase as a result of the introduction of solids
into the mud system.
The type of flow pattern will be governed by the fluid velocity, the annular diameters and
the characteristics of the mud.
In general, the lower the fluid velocity and the greater the annular diameter, the more
likely the flow is to be laminar.
A turbulent flow pattern is more likely when the fluid velocity is high and when there is a
small annular clearance ie around the drill collar section.
The flow pattern is random in time and space, with chaotic and disordered motion of the
fluid particles. This results in two velocity components - longitudinal and transverse.
Turbulent flow will develop at higher fluid velocities with the final velocity profile
tending to be reasonably uniform despite the chaotic components. For this reason,
turbulent flow is actually more affective in cuttings removal, but the disadvantages
outweigh this advantage:-
Disadvantages
One advantage of turbulent flow is when cementing - helping to dislodge mud cake from
the walls allowing the cement to contact fresh surfaces.
Transitional Flow
In reality, there is not an instantaneous change from laminar to turbulent flow as fluid
velocity increases. There will obviously be a transitional period where the flow changes
from one to the other. This transitional flow will exhibit elements of both laminar and
turbulent flow.
It is necessary to know what type of flow pattern is present, not only because of the
physical affects, but in order to calculate pressure losses in the string and the annulus, a
very important part of hydraulic analysis.
Fluid velocity and annular diameters are used to determine the type of flow, in
conjunction with mud density and mud viscosity.
These parameters are used to determine the Reynolds Number, a dimensionless number:
Re = DV
where D = diameter
V = fluid velocity
= density
e = effective viscosity
Notice that the effective viscosity is used in the determination of the Reynolds number,
rather than viscosities derived by surface measurements.
(imperial)
(metric)
Imperial units: e = cP
v = ft/min
D = inches
YP = lb/100ft2
PV = cP
Metric:
v = av annular vel
e = cP
v = m/sec
D = mm
YP = dynes/cm2
PV = cP
2n + 1 ] n
3n ]
= 1916K (DhDp)
4800v
= [ 200 v
[ DhDp
200K (DhDp)
v
x [ 4000 v (2n + 1) ] n
[ DhDp ( n ) ]
2n + 1 ] n
3n ]
Imperial: e = cP
v = ft/min
D = inches
K = lb/100ft2
0.5K (DhDp)
v
Metric: e = cP
v = m/sec
D = mm
K = dynes/cm2
(imperial)
(metric)
(SI)
SI: e = mPa.s
v = m/min
D = mm
K = Poise
Imperial
Re = 15.47 Dv
e
Metric
Re = 1000 DV
e
SI
Re = DV
60e
D = diameter
= inches
v = average velocity = ft/min
= mud density
= ppg
e = effective visc = cP
D = mm
v = m/sec
= kg/litre
e = cP
D = mm
v = m/min
= kg/m3
e = mPa.s
Note that for fluid velocity, an average velocity is used in the determination of the
Reynolds Number and Effective Viscosity. In reality, as we have seen, the velocity is
least at the walls of the conduit, increasing to a maximum at the centre of the channel.
The average fluid velocity (annular velocity or pipe velocity) is determined using the
following formulae:
v (ft/min) = 24.5 Q
Dh2 Dp2
Q = flowrate (gpm)
Dh = hole diameter (in)
Dp = pipe outer diam (in)
v (ft/min) = 1030 Q
Dh2 Dp2
Q = bbls/min
Diameters (in)
v (m/min) = 1273000 Q
Dh2 Dp2
Q = m3/min
Diameters (mm)
These formulae can obviously be used to calculate the velocity of the mud within the
drillstring.
In this case, Dh2 would be replaced by Di2 the inside diameter of the pipe.
Dp would, in this case, be equal to zero.
The value of the Reynolds number defines the transition between laminar and turbulent
flow.
Bingham
The Critical Reynolds Number is 2100.
Power Law
The Critical Reynolds Number is given by 3470 - 1370n
The Critical Velocity is the fluid velocity (whether annular or pipe) at which the flow type
becomes turbulent.
In reality, at wellsite, the engineer is primarily concerned with the annular velocity since
turbulent flow here has the associated problems of hole erosion, damage to cuttings and
removal of filter cake.
When analysing annular velocity, the engineer will be looking for sufficient annular
velocity to affectively lift and remove the cuttings, but within a laminar flow regime so
that minimal damage is done.
Many engineers will be happy with, even require, transitional or turbulent flow around
the drill collar section. Here, the annular clearance is smallest so it is most important to
keep the section clear of cuttings. For remaining annular sections, however, laminar flow
will always be required to minimise hole damage and to keep pressure losses low.
Bingham
String Vc = 2.48 x ( PV + (PV2 + 73.57.YP.Di2.))
Di2
Annular Vc =
3.04
x ( PV + (PV2 + 40.05YP(DhDp)2 ))
2
(DhDp)
Power Law
1
String Vc = 0.6 [ (3470 1370n)K ]
[
1.27
]
2n
[ 3n + 1 ] 2n
[ 1.25 Di n ]
1
Annular Vc = 0.6 [ (3470 1370n)K ]
[
2.05
]
2n
n
[
2n + 1
]
[0.64 (DhDp)n ]
2n
Imperial
1
n
Vc (ft/min) = [ 3.88 x 104K] 2 - n [ ( 2.4 ) (2n + 1) ] 2 - n
[
]
[ (DhDp) ( 3n ) ]
= ppg
D = inches
K = lb / 100ft2
SI
1
Vc (m/min) = [ 9 x 104K] 2 - n [ ( 200 )
[
]
[ (DhDp)
= kg / m3
D = mm
K = Poise
n
(2n + 1) ] 2 - n
( 3n ) ]
Regarding the well as a whole as a closed system, pressure losses will occur throughout
the system :through each drillpipe section
through the bit
through each annular section
through surface lines eg standpipe, kelly hose, pumps and lines
The total of all theses losses ie Total System Pressure Loss should be equal to the actual
pressure measured on the standpipe.
This is a very important part of hydraulic evaluation. Obviously, the maximum pressure
loss possible will be determined by the rating of the pumps and other surface equipment.
This maximum is normally far in excess of the pressure loss that will be desired by the
drilling engineer.
The logging engineers task is normally to take given parameters from the drilling
engineer, then select, for example, the correct nozzle sizes that will produce the desired
system pressure loss.
The amount of pressure loss will be dependant on flowrate, mud density and rheology, the
length of each section and the diameters of each section.
Whether the flow is laminar or turbulent is also an important influence on the pressure
loss - turbulent flow will produce larger pressure losses.
The frictional forces involved will have a large affect on the actual pressure losses in a
given annular or pipe section.
The frictional forces present will be very different depending on whether the flow is
laminar or turbulent:
with laminar flow, the fluid movement is in one direction only - parallel to the conduit
walls, with velocity increasing towards the centre.. Frictional forces will therefore
only be present due to fluid layers moving longitudinally against each other.
with turbulent flow, fluid movement is much more complex and multi-directional, so
that many more frictional forces are present.
For this reason, a coefficient called the Fanning Friction Factor is determined for each
type of flow and whether we are dealing with pipe or annular pressure losses. The friction
factor is determined from the Reynolds Number which has already been calculated for
pipe or annular sections based on annular velocity, diameters, density and effective
viscosity.
Laminar Flow
Turbulent Flow
fann = 24 / Re
fpipe = 16 / Re
fturb = a / Reb
where Re = Reynolds number in the pipe or annulus
a = log n + 3.93
50
b = 1.75 - log n
7
Transitional Flow
fann = [ Re - c ] x [ (
a
) - (24) ] + 24
[ 800 ] [ (4270 - 1370n)b
(c)]
c
fpipe = [ Re - c ] x [ (
a
) - (16) ] + 16
[ 800 ] [ (4270 - 1370n)b
(c)]
c
When using the Power Law Model, the values of the Fanning Friction are substituted into
equations in order to calculate pressure losses in the annulus or in the pipe.
When calculating these pressure losses, each individual section has to be calculated
seperately, then totalled to give an overall pipe or annular pressure loss.
Ploss (KPa) = LQ PV
+
612.95 Di4
where
YP L
13.26Di
Power Law
Here, there is just one equation to be considered, since whether the flow is laminar or
turbulent has already been accounted for by the Reynolds Number and the Fanning
Friction Factor.
SI
where v = ft/min
= ppg
Di = inches
L = ft
laminar flow,
Ploss =
L Q PV
+
408.63(Dh+Dp)(DhDp)3
YP L
13.26(DhDp)
The units are the same as those used in the drillstring pressure loss formula.
Dh = hole diameter (inch)
Dp = pipe outer diam (inch)
Power Law
SI
Ploss (Kpa) =
fa.v2..L
1800 (Dh - Dp)
fa.v2..L
92870 (Dh - Dp)
where v = ft/min
= ppg
Dh = inches
Dp = inches
L = ft
Ploss (Kpa) =
. Q2. 277778
(D1 + D22 +D32 +....)2
2
Ploss (psi) =
. Q2. 156
(D1 + D22 +D32 +....)2
2
where = ppg
Q = gpm
Dn = 32nds inch
Unfortunately, these equations (and the QLOG software) will not produce accurate
calculations for diamond bit pressure losses.
Eastman Christensen suggest the following calculations:-
One method of calculation is based on Binghams formula for turbulent flow pressure
losses, where the main part of the equation, 0.8 Q1.8 PV0.2 is multiplied by a constant
representing 4 rig types or classifications.
Surface Ploss = E 0.8 Q1.8 PV0.2
KPa
kg/litre
litre/min
E is the constant representing the 4 rig surface equipment types. The rig type should be
attainable from charts/tables kept on the rig. If not, the usual type and default is Type 4.
Classification
1
2
3
4
Imperial
E
Metric
2.5 x 104
9.6 x 105
5.3 x 105
4.2 x 105
8.8 x 106
3.3 x 106
1.8 x 106
1.4 x 106
In practice, this classification is generally not available at wellsite. For this reason,
together with the fact that the method is based on a Bingham fluid, Datalog uses another
method based on mud density and flowrate, together with a constant to represent different
types of rig equipment.
Hence:
Surface Pressure Loss = 0.35 x Factor x Mud Density x Flowrate
Factor represents the value selected in the QLOG equipment table - the surface
connection factor. This value can range from 0.2 to 0.5, with 0.5 being the normal
default value.
SI units
Vs = 0.42 Dp (p m)0.667
m0.333 e0.333
Imperial
Vs = 175 Dp (p m)0.667
m0.333 e0.333
Dp = inches
p = ppg
m = ppg
e = cP
Vs = ft/min
Cuttings slip when the flow type is turbulent will be clearly different from when the flow
is laminar and constant forces are involved.
With turbulent flow, whether the slip velocity is constant or not is dependant on the
Reynolds Number determined for the cuttings.
Imperial
Note that there are no velocity or viscosity inputs into this equation. It is therefore
dependant on the Particle Reynolds number as to whether the slip velocity will be
constant.
Imperial
where = ppg
Vs = ft/min
Dp = inches
e = cP
If the Particle Reynolds Number > 2000, the particle will fall at the same rate
ie cuttings slip velocity will be constant in turbulent flow
In the determination of slip velocity, a Cuttings Re number is incorporated. So to, because
of the different frictional forces present on the cuttings, is a friction or drag coefficient.
Vn (m/sec) =
Q
38.71A
Vn (ft/sec) = 0.32Q
A
Q = flowrate (litre/min)
A = total flow area of nozzles (in2)
Q = gpm
A = in2
/4 d2
1024
Vn (m/sec) = 21220 Q
Dn2
Imperial
Vn (ft/sec) = 418.3 Q
Dn2
where Q = m3/min
Dn = mm
where Q = gpm
Dn = 32nds inch
300m x HWDP
DP
Jets 3 x 15 (3 x 11.9mm)
MD 9.8ppg
100 SPM at flowrate 2.0 m3/min
600 and 300 60/35
)
Surface Conn Factor 0.5 ) set in equipment table
This is the power used by the jetting action of the bit, which has to balance maximum
ROP and maximum jetting with effective hole cleaning.
SI units
Imperial
Bit HP (HP) = Pb x Q
1714
Q = flowrate (m3/min)
Pb = bit pressure loss (KPa)
Q = gpm
Pb = psi
The Total System Hydraulic Horsepower can be calculated by substituting the Total
System Pressure Loss (in place of Bit Pressure Loss) into the same equation.
This is the force exerted on the formation due to the fluid exiting the jets. Cleaning is by
direct erosion on the bottom and by cross flow under the bit.
SI units
Bit IF (newtons) = Q Vn
60
Imperial
Bit IF (lbs) = Q Vn
1932
= ppg
Q = gpm
Vn = ft/sec
1.8c Optimization
Hydraulics can be optimised in two ways:1) by maximising the Impact Force of the jets on the bottom of the hole.
2) by maximising the hydraulic power expended by the bit.
The power expended (or used up) by the bit is a proportion of the total power available
( HPt). This is determined either by the maximum pressure of the pumps:
or, more typically, it is based on a desired maximum pump pressure together with a
maximum flow rate that will give sufficient annular velocity for cuttings removal.
Once the maximum power available to the system is known, hydraulic performance can
be optimised in the following ways :-
Since the hydraulic horsepower at the bit is dependent on jet velocity and therefore on the
pressure loss at the bit, hydraulic performance in practice can simply be optimised by
selecting jet sizes to give:
Flowrate
1.8 to 2.2 m3/min
Mud density 9.6 to 10.2 ppg
Maximum System Pressure 2800 psi
Minimum Jet sizes
3 x 10mm
2. With a flowrate of 1.6m3/min, what jets are required to give a system pressure
of 2200psi ?
What now are a) flow types
b) annular velocities
c) % HP at bit
3. Using the following ranges and limits, attempt to optimize the hydraulics whilst
retaining laminar flows in each section and good annular velocities.
Flowrate
1.3 to 1.6 m3/min
Mud density 10.3 to 10.6 ppg
Maximum system pressure 2850 psi
The pressure exerted at the bottom of the hole by the static column of mud is known as
the Hydrostatic Pressure.
PHYD = x TVD x 0.052 where
where
= kg/m3
PHYD = Kpa
TVD = m
During circulation, the pressure exerted by the fluid column at the bottom of the hole
increases as a result of frictional forces and annular pressure losses caused by the fluid
movement.
This increased pressure is termed the Dynamic Pressure or Bottom Hole Circulating
Pressure (BHCP).
BHCP = PHYD + Pa
This in turn means that the acting density of the mud will increase when the fluid is
moving. This is termed the Equivalent Circulating Density.
a.
ECD = + Pa
0.052xTVD
ECD
Pa
TVD
=
=
=
=
b.
ECD = +
Pa
0.00981xTVD
ECD
Pa
TVD
= kg/m3 EMW
= KPa
= m
= kg/m3
1. TVD 3500 ft
Hydrostatic Pressure 1729psi
2. TVD 3000m
Hydrostatic Pressure 32373 Kpa
3. TVD 4000 ft
Mud density 9.5ppg
Annular Pressure Losses 250psi
4. TVD 3000m
Mud density 1150 kg/m3
Annular Pressure Losses 3000 Kpa
a) Hydrostatic Pressure
b) Bottom Hole Circulating Pressure
c) Equivalent Circulating Density
Surge Pressures result from running pipe into the hole creating a pressure increase. The
size of the pressure increase will be dependent on the pipe running speed, the annular
clearance and whether the pipe is open or closed.
Excessive Bottom Hole Pressure could break down weak or unconsolidated formations.
Swab Pressures result from pulling the pipe out of the hole. The frictional drag combined
with the piston effect will create a reduction in pressure.
This reduction in the hydrostatic could lead to the invasion of formation fluids.
More than 25% of blowouts result from reduced hydrostatic pressure caused by
swabbing.
Excessive surge pressures can lead to lost circulation. Running casing is a particularly
vulnerable time due to the small annular clearance and the fact that the casing is
closed ended.
Beside the well safety aspect, invasion of fluids due to swabbing can lead to mud
contamination and necessitate the costly task of replacing the mud.
Firstly, the Fluid Velocity of the displaced mud caused by the pipe movement has to be
calculated.
For Closed Ended Pipe:
Fluid Vel (ft/min) = [ 0.45 +
[
Dp2
Dh2 Dp2
] x Vp
]
This fluid velocity then has to be converted to the equivalent flowrate by using the
annular velocity equation, where:-
24.5 Q
Dh2 Dp2
where Q = gpm
The change in pressure is then calculated for each annular/pipe section using the Pressure
Loss equations. This is calculated for both laminar and turbulent flow with the largest
value being taken.
The total swab or surge pressure acting on the bottom of the hole is the sum of all of the
pressure losses for each annular/pipe section.
This program is used to determine the pressures induced by the defined maximum and
minimum running speeds of the pipe. Thus, a safe speed can be deduced in order to avoid
excessive pressures.
Required information:Bit depth and hole depth - read from the realtime system, editable if required.
Current surge/swab pressure - read from current recorded pressures, editable if
required.
Current Flow In - read from realtime system, editable if required.
Use Current Profile - ie current hole and pipe profiles, the user should select Y(es).
Maximum and Minimum running speed - limits defined by the user. Negative values
should be used in order to calculate swab pressures. For example, for surge pressure, the
minimum running speed may be 5m/min and the maximum 50m/min. For the same
limits, the swab calculation requires the minimum to be set at -50m/min, and the
maximum at -5m/min.
Current running speed - read from realtime system, editable if required.
Press F7 to calculate the maximum and minimum pressures.
Press F2 to print the data out.
Press F8 to produce a plot. The plot will be pressure against running speed and will show
the pressures against the max/min limits defined together with the current
pressure/running speed situation.
Using maximum and minimum running speeds of 20 and 100 m/min, calculate the
swab/surge pressures with the following bit depths:
1000m
2000m
3000m
3500m
3950m
With an increased mudweight of 10.3ppg, calculate, for the same maximum and
minimum running speeds, the swab/surge pressures at 3500 and 3950m.
1. 9.5 ppg
2. 1100 kg/m3
3. Phyd = 1976 psi
BHCP = 2226 psi
ECD = 10.7 ppg EMW
4. Phyd = 33844 Kpa
BHCP = 36844 Kpa
ECD = 1252 kg/m3 EMW
35 + 211 psi
50 + 280 psi
69 + 388 psi
77 + 426 psi
85 + 461 psi