In English, an adherent of the faith commonly refers to himself or herself as a Zoroastrian or as a

Zarathustrian. An older, but still widespread expression is Behdin, meaning "follower of Daena",
for which "Good Religion" is one translation. In the Zoroastrian liturgy, the term Behdin is also
used as a title for an individual who has been formally inducted into the religion in a Navjote
ceremony.
Zoroastrianism /zrostrinzm/, also called Mazdaism and Magianism, is a religion and
philosophy based on the teachings of prophet Zoroaster (also known as Zarathustra, in Avestan)
and was formerly among the world's largest religions.[1] It was probably founded some time
before the 6th century BCE in the eastern part of ancient Greater Iran.
In Zoroastrianism, the Creator Ahura Mazda is all good, and no evil originates from him. Thus,
in Zoroastrianism good and evil have distinct sources, with evil (druj) trying to destroy the
creation of Mazda (asha), and good trying to sustain it. Mazda is not always immanent in the
world, and his creation is represented by the Amesha Spentas and the host of other Yazatas,
through whom the works of God are evident to humanity, and through whom worship of Mazda
is ultimately directed. The most important texts of the religion are those of the Avesta, of which a
significant portion has been lost, and mostly only the liturgies of which have survived. The lost
portions are known of only through references and brief quotations in the later works, primarily
from the 9th to 11th centuries.
In some form, it served as the national or state religion of a significant portion of the Iranian
people for many centuries. The religion first dwindled when the Achaemenid Empire was
invaded by Alexander III of Macedon, after which it collapsed and disintegrated[2] and it was
further gradually marginalized by Islam from the 7th century onwards with the decline of the
Sassanid Empire.[3] The political power of the pre-Islamic Iranian dynasties lent Zoroastrianism
immense prestige in ancient times, and some of its leading doctrines were adopted by other
religious systems. It has no major theological divisions (the only significant schism is based on
calendar differences), but it is not uniform. Modern-era influences have a significant impact on
individual and local beliefs, practices, values and vocabulZoroastrians believe that there is one
universal and transcendent God, Ahura Mazda. He is said to be the one uncreated Creator to
whom all worship is ultimately directed.[6] Ahura Mazda's creationevident as asha, truth and
orderis the antithesis of chaos, which is evident as druj, falsehood and disorder. The resulting
conflict involves the entire universe, including humanity, which has an active role to play in the
conflict.[6]
The religion states that active participation in life through good deeds is necessary to ensure
happiness and to keep chaos at bay. This active participation is a central element in Zoroaster's
concept of free will, and Zoroastrianism rejects all forms of monasticism. Ahura Mazda will

ultimately prevail over the evil Angra Mainyu or Ahriman, at which point the universe will
undergo a cosmic renovation and time will end. In the final renovation, all of creationeven the
souls of the dead that were initially banished to "darkness"will be reunited in Ahura Mazda,
returning to life in the undead form. At the end of time, a savior-figure (a Saoshyant) will bring
about a final renovation of the world (frasho.kereti), in which the dead will be revived.[6]
In Zoroastrian tradition, the "chaotic" is represented by Angra Mainyu (also referred to as
"Ahriman"), the "Destructive Principle", while the benevolent is represented through Ahura
Mazda's Spenta Mainyu, the instrument or "Bounteous Principle" of the act of creation. It is
through Spenta Mainyu that transcendental Ahura Mazda is immanent in humankind, and
through which the Creator interacts with the world. According to Zoroastrian cosmology, in
articulating the Ahuna Vairya formula, Ahura Mazda made His ultimate triumph evident to
Angra Mainyu. As expressions and aspects of Creation, Ahura Mazda emanated the Amesha
Spentas ("Bounteous Immortals"), that are each the hypostasis and representative of one aspect
of that Creation. These Amesha Spenta are in turn assisted by a league of lesser principles, the
Yazatas, each "Worthy of Worship" and each again a hypostasis of a moral or physical aspect of
creation.
Other characteristics
In Zoroastrianism, water (apo, aban) and fire (atar, adar) are agents of ritual purity, and the
associated purification ceremonies are considered the basis of ritual life. In Zoroastrian
cosmogony, water and fire are respectively the second and last primordial elements to have been
created, and scripture considers fire to have its origin in the waters. Both water and fire are
considered life-sustaining, and both water and fire are represented within the precinct of a fire
temple. Zoroastrians usually pray in the presence of some form of fire (which can be considered
evident in any source of light), and the culminating rite of the principle act of worship constitutes
a "strengthening of the waters". Fire is considered a medium through which spiritual insight and
wisdom is gained, and water is considered the source of that wisdom.
While the Parsees in India have traditionally been opposed to proselytizing, probably for
historical reasons, and even considered it a crime for which the culprit may face expulsion,[7]
Iranian Zoroastrians have never been opposed to conversion, and the practice has been endorsed
by the Council of Mobeds of Tehran. While the Iranian authorities do not permit proselytizing
within Iran, Iranian Zoroastrians in exile have actively encouraged missionary activities, with
The Zarathushtrian Assembly in Los Angeles and the International Zoroastrian Centre in Paris as
two prominent centres.
As in many other faiths, Zoroastrians are encouraged to marry others of the same faith, but this is
not a requirement. Rather, it is a creation of those in India. Some members of the Indian
Zoroastrian community (the Parsis) contend that a child must have a Parsi father to be eligible
for introduction into the faith, but this assertion is considered by most[according to whom?] to be a
violation of the Zoroastrian tenets of gender equality, and may be a remnant of an old Indian
legal definition (since overruled) of Parsi. This issue is a matter of debate within the Parsi
community, but with the increasingly global nature of modern society and the dwindling number
of Zoroastrians, such opinions are less vociferous.

In Zoroastrian tradition, life is a temporary state in which a mortal is expected to actively

participate in the continuing battle between truth and falsehood. Prior to being born, the urvan
(soul) of an individual is still united with its fravashi (guardian spirit), and which have existed
since Mazda created the universe. During life, the fravashi acts as a guardian and protector. On
the fourth day after death, the soul is reunited with its fravashi, in which the experiences of life
in the material world are collected for the continuing battle in the spiritual world. For the most
part, Zoroastrianism does not have a notion of reincarnation, at least not until the final renovation
of the world. Despite this, followers of Ilm-e-Kshnoom in India believe in reincarnation and
practice vegetarianism, two principles unknown to Orthodox Zoroastrianism.[8]
In Zoroastrian scripture and tradition, a corpse is a host for decay, i.e., of druj. Consequently,
scripture enjoins the "safe" disposal of the dead in a manner such that a corpse does not pollute
the "good" creation. These injunctions are the doctrinal basis of the fast-fading traditional
practice of "ritual exposure", most commonly identified with the so-called "Towers of Silence"
for which there is no standard technical term in either scripture or tradition. The practice of ritual
exposure is only practised by Zoroastrian communities of the Indian subcontinent, where it is not
illegal, but where alternative disposal methods are desperately sought after diclofenac poisoning
has led to the virtual extinction of scavenger birds. Other Zoroastrian communities either cremate
their dead, or bury them in graves that are cased with lime mortar.
Buddhism is a religion indigenous to the Indian subcontinent that encompasses a variety of
traditions, beliefs, and practices largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama,
who is commonly known as the Buddha (meaning "the awakened one" in Sanskrit and Pli). The
Buddha lived and taught in the eastern part of Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th
and 4th centuries BCE.[1] He is recognized by Buddhists as an awakened or enlightened teacher
who shared his insights to help sentient beings end suffering (dukkha) through eliminating
ignorance (avidy), craving (tan h), and hatred, by way of understanding and seeing dependent
origination (prattyasamutpda) and non-self (antman), and thus attain the highest happiness,
nirva (nirvana).
Two major branches of Buddhism are recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and
Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and
Southeast Asia. Mahayana is found throughout East Asia and includes the traditions of Pure
Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, Tiantai (Tendai) and Shinnyo-en. In
some classifications, Vajrayanapracticed mainly in Tibet and Mongolia, and adjacent parts of

China and Russiais recognized as a third branch, while others classify it as a part of
Mahayana. There are other categorisations of these three Vehicles or Yanas.[2]
While Buddhism remains most popular within Asia, both branches are now found throughout the
world. Estimates of Buddhists worldwide vary significantly depending on the way Buddhist
adherence is defined. Lower estimates are between 350500 million.[3][4][5] Higher estimates are
between 1.2 - 1.6 billion followers.[6][7][8]

Buddhist schools vary on the exact nature of the path to liberation, the importance and canonicity
of various teachings and scriptures, and especially their respective practices.[9] Two of the most
important teachings are dependent origination and no-self. The foundations of Buddhist tradition
and practice are the Three Jewels: the Buddha, the Dharma (the teachings), and the Sangha (the
community). Taking "refuge in the triple gem" has traditionally been a declaration and
commitment to being on the Buddhist path and in general distinguishes a Buddhist from a nonBuddhist.[10] Other practices may include following ethical precepts; support of the monastic
community; renouncing conventional living and becoming a monastic; the development of
mindfulness and practice of meditation; cultivation of higher wisdom and discernment; study of
scriptures; devotional practices; ceremonies; and in the Mahayana tradition, invocation of
buddhas and bodhisattvas.
Judaism (from the Latin Iudaismus, derived from the Greek Ioudasmos, and ultimately from the
Hebrew , Yehudah, "Judah";[1][2] in Hebrew: ,, Yahadut, the distinctive characteristics of
the Judean ethnos[3]) is the religion, philosophy and way of life of the Jewish people.[4] A
monotheistic religion originating in the Hebrew Bible (also known as the Tanakh) and explored
in later texts such as the Talmud, Judaism is considered by religious Jews to be the expression of
the covenantal relationship God established with the Children of Israel.[5] Rabbinic Judaism holds
that God revealed his laws and commandments to Moses on Mount Sinai in the form of both the
Written and Oral Torah.[6] This assertion was historically challenged by the Karaites, a movement
that flourished in the medieval period, which retains several thousand followers today and
maintains that only the Written Torah was revealed.[7] In modern times, liberal movements such
as Humanistic Judaism may be nontheistic.[8]
Judaism claims a historical continuity spanning more than 3,000 years. It is one of the oldest
monotheistic religions,[9] and the oldest to survive into the present day.[10] The Hebrews /
Israelites were already referred to as "Jews" in later books of the Tanakh such as the Book of
Esther, with the term Jews replacing the title "Children of Israel".[11] Judaism's texts, traditions
and values strongly influenced later Abrahamic religions, including Christianity, Islam and the

Baha'i Faith.[12][13] Many aspects of Judaism have also directly or indirectly influenced secular
Western ethics and civil law.[14]

Defining character
Unlike other ancient Near Eastern gods, the Hebrew God is portrayed as unitary and solitary;
consequently, the Hebrew God's principal relationships are not with other gods, but with the
world, and more specifically, with the people He created.[22] Judaism thus begins with an ethical
monotheism: the belief that God is one, and concerned with the actions of humankind.[23]
According to the Hebrew Bible, God promised Abraham to make of his offspring a great nation.
[24]
Many generations later, he commanded the nation of Israel to love and worship only one God;
that is, the Jewish nation is to reciprocate God's concern for the world.[25] He also commanded
the Jewish people to love one another; that is, Jews are to imitate God's love for people.[26] These
commandments are but two of a large corpus of commandments and laws that constitute this
covenant, which is the substance of Judaism.
Thus, although there is an esoteric tradition in Judaism (Kabbalah), Rabbinic scholar Max
Kadushin has characterized normative Judaism as "normal mysticism", because it involves
everyday personal experiences of God through ways or modes that are common to all Jews.[27]
This is played out through the observance of the halakhot and given verbal expression in the
Birkat Ha-Mizvot, the short blessings that are spoken every time a positive commandment is to
be fulfilled.
The ordinary, familiar, everyday things and occurrences, we have constitute occasions for
the experience of God. Such things as one's daily sustenance, the very day itself, are felt
as manifestations of God's loving-kindness, calling for the Berakhot. Kedushah, holiness,
which is nothing else than the imitation of God, is concerned with daily conduct, with
being gracious and merciful, with keeping oneself from defilement by idolatry, adultery,
and the shedding of blood. The Birkat Ha-Mitzwot evokes the consciousness of holiness
at a rabbinic rite, but the objects employed in the majority of these rites are non-holy and
of general character, while the several holy objects are non-theurgic. And not only do
ordinary things and occurrences bring with them the experience of God. Everything that
happens to a man evokes that experience, evil as well as good, for a Berakah is said also
at evil tidings. Hence, although the experience of God is like none other, the occasions
for experiencing Him, for having a consciousness of Him, are manifold, even if we
consider only those that call for Berakot.[28]
Whereas Jewish philosophers often debate whether God is immanent or transcendent, and
whether people have free will or their lives are determined, Halakha is a system through which
any Jew acts to bring God into the world.
Ethical monotheism is central in all sacred or normative texts of Judaism. However, monotheism
has not always been followed in practice. The Jewish Bible (Tanakh) records and repeatedly
condemns the widespread worship of other gods in ancient Israel.[29] In the Greco-Roman era,
many different interpretations of monotheism existed in Judaism, including the interpretations
that gave rise to Christianity.[30]

Moreover, as a non-creedal religion, some have argued that Judaism does not require one to
believe in God. For some, observance of Jewish law is more important than belief in God per se.
[31]
In modern times, some liberal Jewish movements do not accept the existence of a personified
deity active in history.[32]
Jews are an ethnoreligious group[15] and include those born Jewish and converts to Judaism. In
2010, the world Jewish population was estimated at 13.4 million, or roughly 0.2% of the total
world population. About 42% of all Jews reside in Israel and about 42% reside in the United
States and Canada, with most of the remainder living in Europe.[16] The largest Jewish religious
movements are Orthodox Judaism (Haredi Judaism and Modern Orthodox Judaism),
Conservative Judaism and Reform Judaism. A major source of difference between these groups
is their approach to Jewish law.[17] Orthodox Judaism maintains that the Torah and Jewish law are
divine in origin, eternal and unalterable, and that they should be strictly followed. Conservative
and Reform Judaism are more liberal, with Conservative Judaism generally promoting a more
"traditional" interpretation of Judaism's requirements than Reform Judaism. A typical Reform
position is that Jewish law should be viewed as a set of general guidelines rather than as a set of
restrictions and obligations whose observance is required of all Jews.[18][19] Historically, special
courts enforced Jewish law; today, these courts still exist but the practice of Judaism is mostly
voluntary.[20] Authority on theological and legal matters is not vested in any one person or
organization, but in the sacred texts and rabbis and scholars who interpret them.[21]
Confucianism is a Chinese ethical and philosophical system developed from the teachings of the
Chinese philosopher Confucius ( Kng Fz, or K'ung-fu-tzu, lit. "Master Kong", 551
479 BC). Confucianism originated as an "ethical-sociopolitical teaching" during the Spring and
Autumn Period, but later developed metaphysical and cosmological elements in the Han
Dynasty.[1] Following the abandonment of Legalism in China after the Qin Dynasty,
Confucianism became the official state ideology of China, until it was replaced by the "Three
Principles of the People" ideology with the establishment of the Republic of China, and then
Maoist Communism after the ROC was replaced by the People's Republic of China in Mainland
China.
The core of Confucianism is humanism,[2] the belief that human beings are teachable, improvable
and perfectible through personal and communal endeavour especially including self-cultivation
and self-creation. Confucianism focuses on the cultivation of virtue and maintenance of ethics,
the most basic of which are ren, yi, and li.[3] Ren is an obligation of altruism and humaneness for
other individuals within a community, yi is the upholding of righteousness and the moral
disposition to do good, and li is a system of norms and propriety that determines how a person
should properly act within a community.[3] Confucianism holds that one should give up one's life,
if necessary, either passively or actively, for the sake of upholding the cardinal moral values of
ren and yi.[4] Although Confucius the man may have been a believer in Chinese folk religion,

Confucianism as an ideology is humanistic[2] and non-theistic, and does not involve a belief in
the supernatural or in a personal god.[5]
Cultures and countries strongly influenced by Confucianism include mainland China, Taiwan,
Korea, Japan and Vietnam, as well as various territories settled predominantly by Chinese
people, such as Singapore. Although Confucian ideas prevail in these areas, few people outside
of academia identify themselves as Confucian,[6][7] and instead see Confucian ethics as a
complementary guideline for other ideologies and beliefs, including democracy,[8] Marxism,[9]
capitalism,[10] Christianity,[11] Islam[12] and Buddhism.[13]
Confucian Thought

Humanism is at the core in Confucianism.[2] A simple way to appreciate Confucian thought is to

consider it as being based on varying levels of honesty, and a simple way to understand
Confucian thought is to examine the world by using the logic of humanity. In practice, the
primary foundation and function of Confucianism is as an ethical philosophy to be practiced by
all the members of a society.[14] Confucian ethics is characterized by the promotion of virtues,
encompassed by the Five Constants, or the Wuchang (), extrapolated by Confucian scholars
during the Han Dynasty.[15] The five virtues are Rn (, Humaneness), Y (, Righteousness or
Justice), L (, Propriety or Etiquette), Zh (, Knowledge), Xn (, Integrity).[15] They are
accompanied by the classical Sz () with four virtues: Zhng (, Loyalty), Xio (, Filial
piety), Ji (, Continency), Y (, Righteousness). There are still many other elements, such as
Chng (, honesty), Sh (, kindness and forgiveness), Lin (, honesty and cleanness), Ch
(, shame, judge and sense of right and wrong), Yng (, bravery), Wn (, kind and gentle),
Ling (, good, kindhearted), Gng (, respectful, reverent), Jin (, frugal), Rng (,
modestly, self-effacing). Among all elements, Ren (Humanity) and Yi (Righteousness) are
fundamental.
Ren
Ren is one of the basic virtues promoted by Confucius, and is an obligation of altruism and
humaneness for other individuals within a community.[3] Confucius' concept of humaneness
(Chinese: ; pinyin: rn) is probably best expressed in the Confucian version of the ethic of
reciprocity, or the Golden Rule: "Do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto
you."
Etiquett
It is important to note that, although li is sometimes translated as "ritual" or "rites", it has
developed a specialized meaning in Confucianism, as opposed to its usual religious meanings. In
Confucianism, the acts of everyday life are considered rituals. Rituals are not necessarily
regimented or arbitrary practices, but the routines that people often engage in, knowingly or

unknowingly, during the normal course of their lives. Shaping the rituals in a way that leads to a
content and healthy society, and to content and healthy people, is one purpose of Confucian
philosophy.
Loyalty
Loyalty (Chinese: ; pinyin: zhng) is the equivalent of filial piety on a different plane. It is
particularly relevant for the social class to which most of Confucius' students belonged, because
the only way for an ambitious young scholar to make his way in the Confucian Chinese world
was to enter a ruler's civil service. Like filial piety, however, loyalty was often subverted by the
autocratic regimes of China. Confucius had advocated a sensitivity to the realpolitik of the class
relations in his time; he did not propose that "might makes right", but that a superior who had
received the "Mandate of Heaven" (see below) should be obeyed because of his moral rectitude.
In later ages, however, emphasis was placed more on the obligations of the ruled to the ruler, and
less on the ruler's obligations to the ruled.
Loyalty was also an extension of one's duties to friends, family, and spouse. Loyalty to one's
family came first, then to one's spouse, then to one's ruler, and lastly to one's friends. Loyalty
was considered one of the greater human virtues.
Confucius also realized that loyalty and filial piety can potentially conflict
Filial piety
"Filial piety" (Chinese: ; pinyin: xio) is considered among the greatest of virtues and must be
shown towards both the living and the dead (including even remote ancestors). The term "filial"
(meaning "of a child") characterizes the respect that a child, originally a son, should show to his
parents. This relationship was extended by analogy to a series of five relationships (Chinese:
; pinyin: wln):[18]
The Five Bonds

Ruler to Ruled

Father to Son

Husband to Wife

Elder Brother to Younger Brother

Friend to Friend

Specific duties were prescribed to each of the participants in these sets of relationships. Such
duties were also extended to the dead, where the living stood as sons to their deceased family.
This led to the veneration of ancestors. The only relationship where respect for elders wasn't
stressed was the Friend to Friend relationship. In all other relationships, high reverence was held
for elders.

Relationships
Relationships are central to Confucianism. Particular duties arise from one's particular situation
in relation to others. The individual stands simultaneously in several different relationships with
different people: as a junior in relation to parents and elders, and as a senior in relation to
younger siblings, students, and others. While juniors are considered in Confucianism to owe their
seniors reverence, seniors also have duties of benevolence and concern toward juniors. This
theme of mutuality is prevalent in East Asian cultures even to this day.
Social harmonythe great goal of Confucianismtherefore results in part from every individual
knowing his or her place in the social order, and playing his or her part well. When Duke Jing of
Qi asked about government, by which he meant proper administration so as to bring social
harmony, Confucius replied:
There is government, when the prince is prince, and the minister is minister; when the father is
father, and the son is son. (Analects XII, 11, trans. Legge)
Mencius says: "When being a child, yearn for and love your parents; when growing mature,
yearn for and love your lassie; when having wife and child(ren), yearn for and love your wife
and child(ren); when being an official (or a staffer), yearn for and love your sovereign (and/or
boss)
The gentleman
Main article: Junzi
The term jnz (Chinese: ; literally "lord's child") is crucial to classical Confucianism.
Confucianism exhorts all people to strive for the ideal of a "gentleman" or "perfect man". A
succinct description of the "perfect man" is one who "combines the qualities of saint, scholar,
and gentleman." In modern times the masculine translation in English is also traditional and is
still frequently used. Elitism was bound up with the concept, and gentlemen were expected to act
as moral guides to the rest of society.
They were to:

cultivate themselves morally;

show filial piety and loyalty where these are due;

cultivate humanity, or benevolence.

The great exemplar of the perfect gentleman is Confucius himself. Perhaps the tragedy of his life
was that he was never awarded the high official position which he desired, from which he wished
to demonstrate the general well-being that would ensue if humane persons ruled and
administered the state

A Christian) is a person who adheres to Christianity, an Abrahamic, monotheistic religion based

on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as recorded in the Canonical gospels and the letters
of the New Testament. "Christian" derives from the Koine Greek word Christ, a translation of the
Biblical Hebrew term Messiah.[1]
Central to the Christian faith is the gospel, the teaching that humans have hope for salvation
through the message and work of Jesus, and particularly, his atoning death on the cross.
Christians also believe Jesus is the Messiah prophesied in the Hebrew Bible.[2] Most Christians
believe in the doctrine of the Trinity ("tri-unity"), a description of God as Father, Son and Holy
Spirit. This includes the vast majority of churches in Christianity, although a minority are Nontrinitarians.
The term "Christian" is also used adjectivally to describe anything associated with Christianity,
or in a proverbial sense "all that is noble, and good, and Christ-like."[3] It is also used as a label to
identify people who associate with the cultural aspects of Christianity, irrespective of personal
religious beliefs or practices.[4]

Etymology
The Greek word (Christianos)meaning "follower of Christ"comes from
(Christos)meaning "anointed one"[5]with an adjectival ending borrowed from Latin to
denote adhering to, or even belonging to, as in slave ownership.[6] In the Greek Septuagint,
christos was used to translate the Hebrew
( Maah , messiah), meaning "[one who is]
anointed."[7] In other European languages, equivalent words to 'Christian' are likewise derived
from the Greek, such as 'Chrtien' in French and 'Cristiano' in Spanish.

Early usage
The first recorded use of the term (or its cognates in other languages) is in the New Testament, in
Acts 11:26, which states "...in Antioch the disciples were first called Christians." The second

mention of the term follows in Acts 26:28, where Herod Agrippa II replies to Paul the Apostle,
"Do you think that in such a short time you can persuade me to be a Christian?" The third and
final New Testament reference to the term is in 1 Peter 4:16, which exhorts believers, "...if you
suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name."
Another term for Christians which appears in the New Testament is "Nazarenes" which is used
by the Jewish lawyer Tertullus in Acts 24. Tertullian (Against Marcion 4:8) records that "the
Jews call us Nazarenes," while around 331 AD Eusebius records that Christ was called a
Nazoraean from the name Nazareth, and that in earlier centuries "Christians," were once called
"Nazarenes."[8] The Hebrew equivalent of "Nazarenes", Notzrim, occurs in the Babylonian
Talmud, and is still the modern Israeli Hebrew term for Christian.
All three original New Testament usages verses reflect a derisive element in the term Christian to
refer to followers of Christ who did not acknowledge the emperor of Rome.[9] The town Antioch,
which is said to have given them the name Christian, had a reputation for coming up with such
nicknames.[10] However Peter's apparent endorsement of the term, led to it being preferred over
"Nazarenes" and the term Christianoi from 1 Peter becomes the standard term in the Early
Church Fathers from Ignatius and Polycarp onwards.[11]
The earliest occurrences of the term in non-Christian literature include Josephus, referring to "the
tribe of Christians, so named from him;"[12] Pliny the Younger in correspondence with Trajan; and
Tacitus, writing near the end of the 1st century. In the Annals he relates that "by vulgar
appellation [they were] commonly called Christians"[13] and identifies Christians as Nero's
scapegoats for the

Hinduism is the predominant religion[3][4] of the Indian subcontinent, and one of its indigenous
religions. Hinduism includes Shaivism, Vaishnavism and rauta among numerous other
traditions. It also includes historical groups, for example the Kapalikas. Among other practices
and philosophies, Hinduism includes a wide spectrum of laws and prescriptions of "daily
morality" based on karma, dharma, and societal norms.[5] Hinduism is a conglomeration of
distinct intellectual or philosophical points of view, rather than a rigid common set of beliefs.[6]

Hinduism is formed of diverse traditions and has no single founder.[7] Among its direct roots is
the historical Vedic religion of Iron Age India and, as such, Hinduism is often called the "oldest
living religion"[8] or the "oldest living major religion" in the world.[3][9][10][11]
One orthodox classification of Hindu texts is to divide into ruti ("revealed") and Smriti
("remembered") texts. These texts discuss theology, philosophy, mythology, rituals and temple
building among other topics. Major scriptures include the Vedas, Upanishads, Purn as,
Mahbhrata, Rmyan a, Bhagavad Gt and gamas.
Hinduism, with about one billion followers, is the world's third largest religion, after Christianity
and Islam.
The word Hindu is derived (through Persian) from the Sanskrit word Sindhu, the historic local
appellation for the Indus River in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent, which is first
mentioned in the Rig Veda.[12][13][14]
The word Hindu was borrowed into European languages from the Arabic term al-Hind, referring
to the land of the people who live across the River Indus,[15] itself from the Persian term Hind,
which refers to all Indians. By the 13th century, Hindustn emerged as a popular alternative
name of India, meaning the "land of Hindus".[16]
The term Hinduism also occurs sporadically in Sanskrit texts such as the later Rajataranginis of
Kashmir (Hinduka, c. 1450), some 16th-18th century Bengali Gaudiya Vaishnava texts, including
Chaitanya Charitamrita and Chaitanya Bhagavata, usually to contrast Hindus with Yavanas or
Mlecchas.[17] It was only towards the end of the 18th century that the European merchants and
colonists referred collectively to the followers of Indian religions as Hindus. The term Hinduism
was introduced into the English language in the 19th century to denote the religious,
philosophical, and cultural traditions native to India.
Hinduism does not have a "unified system of belief encoded in declaration of faith or a creed",[50]
but is rather an umbrella term comprising the plurality of religious phenomena originating and
based on the Vedic traditions.[51][52][53][54]
The characteristic of comprehensive tolerance to differences in belief, and Hinduism's openness,
makes it difficult to define as a religion according to traditional Western conceptions.[55] To its
adherents, Hinduism is the traditional way of life,[56] and because of the wide range of traditions
and ideas incorporated within or covered by it, arriving at a comprehensive definition of the term
is problematic.[50] While sometimes referred to as a religion, Hinduism is more often defined as a
religious tradition.[4] It is therefore described as both the oldest of the world's religions, and the
most diverse.[3][57][58][59] Most Hindu traditions revere a body of religious or sacred literature, the
Vedas, although there are exceptions. Some Hindu religious traditions regard particular rituals as

essential for salvation, but a variety of views on this co-exist. Some Hindu philosophies postulate
a theistic ontology of creation, of sustenance, and of destruction of the universe, yet some Hindus
are atheists. Hinduism is sometimes characterized by the belief in reincarnation (samsara),
determined by the law of karma, and the idea that salvation is freedom from this cycle of
repeated birth and death. However, other religions of the region, such as Buddhism, Jainism and
Sikhism, also believe in karma, outside the scope of Hinduism.[50] Hinduism is therefore viewed
as the most complex of all of the living, historical world religions.[60] Despite its complexity,
Hinduism is not only one of the numerically largest faiths, but is also the oldest living major
tradition on earth, with roots reaching back into prehistory.[61]
A definition of Hinduism, given by the first Vice President of India, who was also a prominent
theologian, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, states that Hinduism is not "just a faith", but in itself is
related to the union of reason and intuition. Radhakrishnan explicitly states that Hinduism cannot
be defined, but is only to be experienced.[62] Similarly some academics suggest that Hinduism
can be seen as a category with "fuzzy edges", rather than as a well-defined and rigid entity. Some
forms of religious expression are central to Hinduism, while others are not as central but still
remain within the category. Based on this, Ferro-Luzzi has developed a 'Prototype Theory
approach' to the definition of Hinduism.[63]
Problems with the single definition of what is actually meant by the term 'Hinduism' are often
attributed to the fact that Hinduism does not have a single or common historical founder.
Hinduism, or as some say 'Hinduisms,' does not have a single system of salvation and has
different goals according to each sect or denomination. The forms of Vedic religion are seen not
as an alternative to Hinduism, but as its earliest form, and there is little justification for the
divisions found in much western scholarly writing between Vedism, Brahmanism, and Hinduism.
[11][64]

A definition of Hinduism is further complicated by the frequent use of the term "faith" as a
synonym for "religion".[50] Some academics[65] and many practitioners refer to Hinduism using a
native definition, as Santana Dharma, a Sanskrit phrase meaning "the eternal law", or the
"eternal way".[66][67]
Beliefs
Hinduism refers to a religious mainstream which evolved organically and spread over a large
territory marked by significant ethnic and cultural diversity. This mainstream evolved both by
innovation from within, and by assimilation of external traditions or cults into the Hindu fold.
The result is an enormous variety of religious traditions, ranging from innumerable small,
unsophisticated cults to major religious movements with millions of adherents spread over the
entire subcontinent. The identification of Hinduism as an independent religion separate from
Buddhism or Jainism consequently hinges on the affirmation of its adherents that it is such.[68]

Hinduism grants absolute and complete freedom of belief and worship.[69][70][71] Hinduism
conceives the whole world as a single family that deifies the one truth, and therefore it accepts all
forms of beliefs and dismisses labels of distinct religions which would imply a division of
identity.[72] Hence, Hinduism is devoid of the concepts of apostasy, heresy and blasphemy.[73][74][75]
[76]

Prominent themes in Hindu beliefs include (but are not restricted to), Dharma (ethics/duties),
Samsra (the continuing cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth), Karma (action and subsequent
reaction), Moksha (liberation from samsara), and the various Yogas (paths or practices).[77]
Concept of God
God in Hinduism
Krishna displays his Vishvarupa (Universal Form) to Arjuna on the battlefield of Kurukshetra.
Hinduism is a diverse system of thought with beliefs spanning monotheism, polytheism,
panentheism, pantheism, monism, and atheism among others;[78][79][80][81] and its concept of God is
complex and depends upon each individual and the tradition and philosophy followed. It is
sometimes referred to as henotheistic (i.e., involving devotion to a single god while accepting the
existence of others), but any such term is an overgeneralization.[82]
The Rig Veda, the oldest scripture and the mainstay of Hindu philosophy does not take a
restrictive view on the fundamental question of God and the creation of universe. It rather lets
the individual seek and discover answers in the quest of life. Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) of
the Rig Veda thus says:[83][84]
Who really knows?
Who will here proclaim it?
Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation?
Most Hindus believe that the spirit or soul the true "self" of every person, called the tman
is eternal.[85] According to the monistic/pantheistic theologies of Hinduism (such as Advaita
Vedanta school), this Atman is ultimately indistinct from Brahman, the supreme spirit. Hence,
these schools are called non-dualist.[86] The goal of life, according to the Advaita school, is to
realize that one's tman is identical to Brahman, the supreme soul.[87] The Upanishads state that
whoever becomes fully aware of the tman as the innermost core of one's own self realizes an
identity with Brahman and thereby reaches moksha (liberation or freedom).[85][88]
The schools of Vedanta and Nyaya states that karma itself proves the existence of God .[89][90]
Nyaya being the school of logic, makes the "logical" inference that the universe is an effect and
it ought to have a creator.[91]
Dualistic schools (see Dvaita and Bhakti) understand Brahman as a Supreme Being who
possesses personality, and they worship him or her thus, as Vishnu, Brahma, Shiva, or Shakti,
depending upon the sect. The tman is dependent on God, while moksha depends on love
towards God and on God's grace.[92] When God is viewed as the supreme personal being (rather
than as the infinite principle), God is called Ishvara ("The Lord"),[93] Bhagavan ("The Auspicious
One"[93]) or Parameshwara ("The Supreme Lord"[93]).[86] However interpretations of Ishvara vary,

ranging from non-belief in Ishvara by followers of Mimamsakas, to identifying Brahman and

Ishvara as one, as in Advaita.[86] In the majority of traditions of Vaishnavism he is Vishnu, God,
and the text of Vaishnava scriptures identify this Being as Krishna, sometimes referred to as
svayam bhagavan. However,under Shaktism, Devi or Adi parashakti is considered as the
Supreme Being and in Shaivism Shiva is considered Supreme.
The multitude of devas are viewed as avatars of the Brahman.[94][95][96][97] In discussing the
Trimurti, Sir William Jones states that Hindus "worship the Supreme Being under three forms
Vishnu, Siva, Brahma...The fundamental idea of the Hindu religion, that of metamorphoses, or
transformations, is exemplified in the Avatars."[98]
In Bhagavad Gita, for example, God is the sole repository of Gunas (attributes) also, as[99]
His hands and feet are everywhere, He looks everywhere and all around, His eyes, ears and face
point to all directions, and all the three worlds are surrounded by these.
Atheistic doctrines dominate Hindu schools like Samkhya and Mimamsa.[100] The
Skhyapravacana Stra of Samkhya argues that the existence of God (Ishvara) cannot be
proved and hence cannot be admitted to exist.[101] Samkhya argue that an unchanging God cannot
be the source of an ever changing world. It says God was a necessary metaphysical assumption
demanded by circumstances.[102] Proponents of the school of Mimamsa, which is based on rituals
and orthopraxy states that the evidence allegedly proving the existence of God was insufficient.
They argue that there is no need to postulate a maker for the world, just as there is no need for an
author to compose the Vedas or a God to validate the rituals.[103] Mimamsa considers the Gods
named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. To that
regard, the power of the mantras is what is seen as the power of Gods.[104]