Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EVALUATIONMODELFORTECHNICAL
EDUCATIONPROGRAMMES
ParmodKumarSingla
AssistantProfessor,CurriculumDevelopmentCentre,NationalInstituteof
TechnicalTeachersTrainingandResearch,
Sector26,Chandigarh160019(INDIA)
ABGupta
Professor,CurriculumDevelopmentCentre,NationalInstituteof
TechnicalTeachersTrainingandResearch,
Sector26,Chandigarh160019(INDIA)
PRESENTATIONS
Introduction
CurriculumDevelopmentStages
CurriculumEvaluationModels
SuggestedIntegratedCurriculum
EvaluationModelOSEModel
Conclusions
INTRODUCTION
Acurriculumisanattempttocommunicatetheessential
featuresofeducationalprogrammes,preferablyusingspecific
objectivesandasystematicapproachtothedesignand
managementtoteachingandlearning.
Itshouldbecapableofeffectivetranslationbyteachersinthe
field.
Incontemporarytechnicaleducationitisarguedthatthe
curriculumshouldachievea"symbiosis"withthetechnology
andworldofworkinwhichthestudentswillserve.
Thecurriculummustberesponsivetochangingvaluesand
expectationsineducationifitistoremainuseful.
Forcomprehensivecurriculumevaluation,ithastobevery
systematicandshouldcoveralltheaspectsrelatedto
curriculumdevelopment.
CURRICULUMDEVELOPMENTSTAGES
NeedAnalysisStage
CurriculumDesignStage
Curriculum Development and Implementation
Stage
CurriculumEvaluationStage
NEED
ANALYSIS
STAGE
CURRICULUM
IMPLEMENTATION
STAGE
CURRICULUM
DESIGN
STAGE
CURRICULUM
EVALUTION
STAGE
FEEDBACK
STAGESOFCURRICULUMDEVELOPMENT
Thecurriculumshouldbe
berelevanttotheneeds
befeasiblefortheworkingenvironment
adequately
purposes
guide
planning
strategies
for
implementation
becapableofbeingusedasabasisfor
improvement
CURRICULUMEVALUATIONMODELS
StakesCountenanceModel:RobertE.Stake
proposedamodelforcarryingoutcurriculum
evaluationthatfocusesondescriptionand
judgment.
TylersGoalAttainmentModel:Itfocuseson
formulationofgoalsthroughdetailedanalysisof
feedbackfromstudents,societyandsubject
matter(theextenttowhicheducationalgoalsofa
programhavebeenachieved).
CURRICULUMEVALUATIONMODELS
StufflebeamsCIPPModel:Stufflebeam
(1971)developedamodel,popularlyknown
asCIPPmodel,whichevaluatescontext,
input,processandproduct.
ScrivenGoalFreeModel:Thechecklist
usedinthismodelprescribestheminimum
levelstobeachievedbyaprogram.
KirkpatricksFourLevelModel:Donald
Kirkpatrick(1994)developedafourlevel
model.
SUGGESTEDINTEGRATEDCURRICULUM
EVALUATIONMODELOSEMODEL
Stage1ObjectivesEvaluation
Stage2SystemEvaluation
Stage3EsotericEvaluation
SUGGESTEDINTEGRATEDCURRICULUM
EVALUATIONMODELOSEMODEL
Stage1ObjectivesEvaluation
Itisimportanttoinvestigatewhetherthe
objectivesare:
worthachieving?
feasibleandachievable?
welldefinedwithdueregardtothegoalsand aims
ofaninstituteoranorganization?
demanddriven and as per the needs and
requirements of the employers, society and
individuals?
achieved?
Stage1ObjectivesEvaluation
Attainedobjectivesreflectasuccessfulinstructional
programandthusitcanbeconcludedthat
curriculumiswelldocumented.
Oncetheevaluatorinfersthatalltheobjectiveshave
beenachieveds/hemayregisteritasgood
curriculumandrecommendthatitshouldcontinue.
Incases/hefindsanygapsintheobjectivess/he
mayrecommendforacurriculumreview.
S/hemaynotproceedfurtherinher/his
curriculumevaluationinstigations,unless
s/heisaskedtogobeyonditbytheclient.
Stage2SystemEvaluation
Thecurriculumisimplementedinasystem,
whichconsistsof:
Input
Process
Environmentinwhichitworksand
Output.
Itisessentialtocriticallylookintothe
featuresofasystemtoarriveatadecision
regardingcurriculumchanges.
Stage2SystemEvaluation:Inputs
Stage2SystemEvaluation:Process
Extentofcoverageofsyllabus.
Integrationoftheoryandpractice.
Involvementoflearnersintheteachinglearning
process.
Appropriatenessandutilizationofresources.
Types of learning experiences provided to the
learner.
Academicplanninganditsimplementation.
Appropriatenessofstudentsevaluationsystem.
Stage2SystemEvaluation:Output
Academic
Stage2SystemEvaluation:Environment
Motivationoffacultyandstaff.
Autonomyavailableintheinstitute.
Delegationoftheauthorityandresponsibilities.
Inbuilttransparencyinthesystem.
Flexibilityinmanagementandadministration.
Dynamicandvisionaryleadership
Cleanandhealthyworkingenvironment.
S/hecanidentifytheareasofgapsthatneedattention
fortheclients.Theevaluatorcanthenproceedtothe
nextstageofesotericevaluation,providedtheclient
makesthefundsandtimeavailable.
Stage3EsotericEvaluation
Aninstituteisdistinguishedforitsesoteric
dimensionswhichgobeyondthecallofits
curricularactivities.Theevaluator,atthis
stageshouldfocusonfollowingaspects:
Cocurriculumandextracurriculumactivities.
Effortsinimprovingemployability.
Partnershipwiththeindustry.
Researchanddevelopmenteffortsmade.
Updatingfacultyandstaff.
Acquisitionofmodernmachinesandtools.
Stage3EsotericEvaluation
Learnersinvolvementintheactivities.
Promoting
CONCLUSIONS
Anintegratedmodelforcurriculumevaluationof
technicaleducationprogrammesproposedinthe
paper(OSE)evaluatesthecurriculumfromthree
aspectsobjectives;systemandesotericefforts
madebytheinstitution.
Theevaluatorshouldmakeeffortssothat
informationiscollectedfromdifferentsourcesusing
differentevaluationtools.
Atthesametime,theevaluatorshouldensurethat
theevaluationisvalidandreliable'.
Agoodcurriculumevaluationsystemsurelylendsa
distinctivecachettotheeducationalprogramme.
GODBEWITHYOU