Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marking Frame
2011-12
Mark
(Out
of
100)
Element
Research
Proposal
(First
marker
only)
Justify
their
research
in
the
context
of
their
professional
and
personal
development.
Provide
a
rationale
for
their
chosen
research
topic.
Define
the
parameters
of
their
research.
Specify
the
research
aim
and
objectives.
Identify
potential
types
of
data
analysis
appropriate
to
their
research.
Determine
if
there
is
a
need
for
risk
assessment
and
ethics
forms
to
be
completed.
Unacceptable Work
Adequate Work
40 49
10
Acceptable Work
50 - 59
25
60-69
10
Excellent Work
70-79
Logically
and
clearly
present
structured
data
analysis,
using
relevant
computer
software.
Validate
key
findings
of
primary
research.
Analyse
and
cross-analyse
primary
research
data.
Discuss
key
findings
through
comparison
and
interpreting
of
primary
and
secondary
data.
25
Outstanding Work
80-100
10
100
Introduction
Literature Review
Research Methodology
Conclusions
Oral Presentation
Identify
reliable
and
relevant
secondary
and
primary
sources
of
information
in
their
literature
review.
Present
evidence
of
up-to-date
reading
and
integration
of
supplementary
sources.
Critically
evaluate
the
work
of
others
and
relate
it
to
their
own
research
aim
and
objectives.
Adopt
and
correctly
use
Harvard
referencing
style.
Illustrate
the
extent
to
which
they
have
accomplished
the
aim
and
objectives
of
their
research.
Propose
sound
conclusions
drawn
from
their
research
findings.
Identify
any
relevant
limitations
experienced
in
the
conduct
of
their
research.
Present
valid
recommendations
for
future
research.
Write
in
a
clear
and
succinct
style.
Use
grammar
correctly
and
spell
accurately.
Make
good
use
of
appendices.
Plan
and
deliver
a
verbal
and
visual
presentation
of
their
research
findings.
Total
Weighting
Mark
Obtained
Marking
Guide
0 - 39