Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The population dynamics of Calanus chilensis (Copepoda: Crustacea) was analyzed using a mixture of field data
and mathematical models. Field data were obtained in the Humboldt Current upwelling area, at Mejillones del Sur
Bay (northern Chilean coast) during the spring of 1990 and 1991. Those data were used to set the parameter values
and functions of a stage-structured population model (SSPM). The model was built and run with STELLA-II version
3.07, an interactive, iconographic modeling software. The results show that C. chilensis has a generation time of 20
days, and that its population dynamics in the spring is controlled by upwelling events, which affect both its growth
rate (food dependence) and its local population size (advection). 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Calanus chilensis, upwelling, population model; Chilean coast; Copepods; STELLA II
1. Introduction
66
67
Fig. 1. Geographic location of oceanographic stations at Mejillones del Sur Bay (MB). Station B was located inside the Bay, station
P was located near the point where upwelling occurs.
(1)
2. Methods
ME =
ty
f
(2)
68
Fig. 2. Diagram of the stage-structured population model (SSPM) built using STELLA II software. State variables appears as
squares, one for each developmental stage. Basic equations governing the model can be found in Appendix A.
Ci (t)= Ci (tDt)
+ (moltC(i 1) moltC(i + 1) mortCi
AdvecCi )Dt
(3)
(4)
69
Table 1
Parameters (p) and forcing functions (ff) for the stage-structured population model of Calanus chilensis (see text for details)
Parameter and forcing functions
Category
Explanation
Units
EggStDur
N6CIVStDur
CVStDur
mortRateN6
MortRateCICIV
MortRateCVFem
MIGc 1
MIGc 2
Food
Me
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
ff
ff
Days
Days
Days
Days1
Days1
Days1
None
where:
EggProd= Females(0.08 +(Chla0.87))
(5)
(6)
mg l1
None
70
Fig. 3. Environmental variables measured at Mejillones del Sur Bay during September October 1990 and 1991. (A) Ekman
transport, (B) spectral analysis of the Ekman transport, (C) sea surface temperature, (D) integrated chlorophyll-a.
Maximum
Normal run
Minimum
Stage
N6
CICIV
CVFem
0.10
0.08
0.05
0.10
0.06
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.02
3. Results
Period
I
II
III
Year
1990
1991
(7)
71
72
Fig. 4. Temporal changes of stage specific abundance for Calanus chilensis at Mejillones del Sur Bay during 1990. Numbers in the
y-axis are in organisms per m3.
Fig. 5. Temporal changes of stage-specific abundance for Calanus chilensis at Mejillones del Sur Bay during 1991. Numbers in the
y-axis are in organisms per m3.
73
S6i = 0 Ni Si
S6i = 0 Ni
(8)
74
Fig. 6. Temporal changes in relative abundance (%) of developmental stages of Calanus chilensis during 1990 (A) and 1991 (B). The
scale for the color pattern appears at the bottom of the figure.
75
Fig. 7. Temporal changes in the mean stage index S (see text for details) for Calanus chilensis during 1990 and 1991.
Fig. 8. Outcome of the normal run of the SSPM. Numbers in the y-axis are in organisms per m3. See Figs. 4 and 5 for comparison
with real data from Mejillones Bay.
76
Value
Units
N6
CI
CII
CIII
CIV
CV
FEM
70
350
700
1000
460
60
30
Organisms
Organisms
Organisms
Organisms
Organisms
Organisms
Organisms
Value
Units
m3
m3
m3
m3
m3
m3
m3
4. Discussion
The main objective of this work was to show an
example of how to use STELLA II to study the
population dynamics of a planktonic marine organism. The specific example chosen was the study
of the life cycle of a calanoid copepod, C. chilensis,
and its interaction with the coastal upwelling in the
northern Chilean coast. Given this objective, the
discussion will deal with two issues: (1) What new
information have we gained on the specific example chosen (i.e. upwelling dynamics and life cycles
of planktonic organisms)?; and (2) What is the
potential use of iconographic modeling software in
global programs that require a balanced mixture of
field data analysis and mathematical modeling?
Parameters
Parameter
EggStDur
N6CIVStDur
CVStDur
mortRateN6
mortRateCICIV
mortRateCVFem
MIGc1
MIGc2
10
2
3
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.60
Days
Days
Days
Days1
Days1
Days1
None
None
77
Fig. 9. Temporal changes in the mean stage index S of the normal run of the SSPM.
78
Fig. 10. Temporal changes of the total copepod abundance in the SSPM. The runs correspond to the following conditions: st90,
standard run; st91, standard run, using the wind conditions of 1991; W90m1, wind conditions for 1990 with migration terms set to
1; W90m0, wind conditions of 1990 with migration term set to 0; W91m1, wind conditions for 1991 with migration terms set to 1;
W91m0, wind conditions of 1991 with migration term set to 0.
abundance reflect the time evolution of the upwelling dynamics, both through food and advection effects. That is, vertical migration does not
compensate for the general drifting problem, but
it is more than likely an attenuation factor.
79
Fig. 11. Outcome of the SSPM considering constant, maximum egg production. Numbers in the y-axis are in organisms per m3.
5. Conclusions
The simulation of changes in stage-specific abundance of copepods through a stage-structured population model, SSPM, shows that the maintenance
and growth of a local population of C. chilensis at
Mejillones del Sur Bay, Chile, can be explained as
a combination of advective forces and vertical
migration plus food-dependent egg production.
Easy-to-learn iconographic modeling software,
such as STELLA II, can be an effective tool in
closing the gap between empiricists and modelers whose interaction will be vital in the develop-
80
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by projects
FONDECYT 268/89 and 1049/92 from CONICYT-CHILE and also by project EIMS (Environmental Information and Modeling System)
awarded to Universidad de Chile by IBM Environmental Research Fund (IBM International
Foundation). The author is thankful to Donald
D. Adams (State University of New York, Plattsburgh) and to two anonymous reviewers for their
critical comments of the manuscript.
References
Angel, M.V., 1994. Spatial distribution of marine organisms.
In: Edwards, P.J., May, R.M., Webb, N.R. (Eds.), Largescale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Blackwell Science, New York, pp. 59110.
Attwood, C.G., Peterson, C.G., 1989. Reduction in fecundity
and lipids of the copepod Calanus australis (Brodskii) by
strong pulsed upwelling. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 129,
121 131.
Bowden, K.F., 1983. Physical Oceanography of Coastal Waters. Ellis Horwood Series in Marine Science. Wiley, New
York, 302 pp.
Bradford, J.M., Ohman, M.D., Jillett, J.B., 1988. Larval morphology and development of Neocalanus tonsus, Calanoides
macrocarinatus, and Calanus australis (Copepoda:
Calanoida) in the laboratory. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater
Res. 22, 301 320.
Carlotti, F., Radach, G., 1996. Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton and Calanus finmarchicus in the North Sea as
revealed by a coupled one-dimensional model. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 41, 522 539.
Conover, R.J., 1988. Comparative life histories in the genera
Calanus and Neocalanus in high latitudes of the northern
hemisphere. Hydrobiologia 167/168, 127142.
Escribano, R., Rodriguez, L., 1994. Life cycle of Calanus
chilensis Brodsky in Bay of San Jorge, Antofagasta, Chile.
Hydrobiologia 292/293, 289294.
81
Appendix A
Equations and terms of the stage-structured population model (SSPM) for C. chilensis. The model was
built and run using the modeling software STELLA II (version 3.0.7 for windows). Comments appear
in square brackets.
{Initialization}
[Values for the standard run are given in Table 4; GRAPH(TIME) data were taken from Fig. 3]
INIT N6=
INIT CI=
INIT CII=
INIT CIII=
INIT CIV=
INIT CV=
INIT Fem=
Food =GRAPH(TIME)
[(day, value)]
(0.00, 2.00), (3.16, 2.00), (6.32, 2.00), (9.47, 3.50), (12.6, 3.50), (15.8, 7.00), (18.9, 7.00), (22.1, 6.50),
(25.3, 6.50), (28.4, 9.00), (31.6, 6.00), (34.7, 7.00), (37.9, 3.00), (41.1, 1.50), (44.2, 2.00), (47.4, 2.00),
(50.5, 1.00), (53.7, 1.30), (56.8, 44.5), (60.0, 9.00)
Me = GRAPH(TIME)
[day, value]
(0.00, 0.222), (1.00, 0.203), (2.00, 0.291), (3.00, 0.138), (4.00, 0.11), (5.00, 0.894), (6.00, 0.715), (7.00,
0.014), (8.00, 0.003), (9.00, 0.005), (10.0, 0.32), (11.0, 0.377), (12.0, 0.006), (13.0, 0.384), (14.0,
0.002), (15.0, 0.07), (16.0, 0.465), (17.0, 0.39), (18.0, 0.121), (19.0, 0.32), (20.0, 0.193), (21.0, 0.171),
(22.0, 0.019), (23.0, 0.022), (24.0, 0.212), (25.0, 0.299), (26.0, 0.204), (27.0, 0.763), (28.0, 0.276), (29.0,
0.001), (30.0, 0.036), (31.0, 0.425), (32.0, 0.308), (33.0, 0.231), (34.0, 0.229), (35.0, 0.536), (36.0,
1.00), (37.0, 0.743), (38.0, 0.146), (39.0, 0.279), (40.0, 0.885), (41.0, 0.15), (42.0, 0.001), (43.0, 0.768),
(44.0, 0.401), (45.0, 0.273), (46.0, 0.276), (47.0, 0.349), (48.0, 0.322), (49.0, 0.229), (50.0, 0.241), (51.0,
0.603), (52.0, 0.479), (53.0, 0.107), (54.0, 0.078), (55.0, 0.443), (56.0, 0.425), (57.0, 0.212), (58.0,
0.201), (59.0, 0.388), (60.0, 0.549)
{Runtime equations}
82
N6(t)= N6(tdt)+(PopGrowthmortN6moltN6AdvecN6)*dt
CI(t) =CI(tdt)+(moltN6mortCImoltCIAdvecCI)*dt
CII(t)= CII(tdt)+(moltCImortCIImoltCIIAdvecCII)*dt
CIII(t)=CIII(tdt)+(moltCIImortCIIImoltCIIIAdvecCIII)*dt
CIV(t)=CIV(tdt)+(moltCIIImortCIVmoltCIVAdvecCIV)*dt
CV(t)=CV(tdt)+(moltCIVmortCVmoltCI 5AdvecCV)*dt
Fem(t)= Fem(tdt)+(moltCI 5mortFemAdvecFem)*dt
Total= CI+CII+CIII+CIV+CV+Fem+N6
S= ((N6*0.1)+(CI*1.0)+(CII*2)+(CIII*3)+(CIV*4)+(CV*5)+(Fem*6))/Total
{PRODUCTION and MOLTING TERMS}
PopGrowth = (EggProd/EggStDur)
EggProd =IF (Food530) then (0.08+(Food*0.87))*Fem ELSE 26
moltN6= N6/N6CIVStDur
moltCI = CI/N6CIVStDur
moltCII =CII/N6CIVStDur
moltCIII = CIII/N6CIVStDur
moltCIV=CIV/N6CIVStDur
moltCV= CV/CVStDur
{MORTALITY TERMS}
mortN6=N6*mortRateN6
mortCI = CI*mortRateCICIV
mortCII =CII*mortRateCICIV
mortCIII =CIII*mortRateCICIV
mortCIV= CIV*mortRateCICIV
mortCV= CV*mortRateCVFem
mortFem= Fem*mortRateCVFem
{ADVECTION TERMS}
AdvecN6=N6*Me
AdvecCI= CI*Me*(1MIG c1)
AdvecCII= CII*Me*(1MIG c 1)
AdvecCIII= CIII*Me*(1MIG c1)
AdvecCIV= CIV*Me*(1MIG c2)
AdvecCV= CV*Me*(1MIG c 2)
AdvecFem=Fem*Me*(1MIG c2)
{PARAMETERS}
[See Table 4 for standard run parameter values and units]
EggStDur=
N6CIVStDur=
CVStDur =
mortRateN6=
mortRateCICIV=
mortRateCVFem=
MIGc 1=
MIG c2=