Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Note: See the last page, District Clerk Sheryl Loesch Refused
to "scan and file" Exhibits 1-15 to Complaint (Doc. 1).
Clerk Loesch did not respond to my letter about the matter.

Filed 09/28/10 Page 1 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 2 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 3 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 4 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 5 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 6 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 7 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 8 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 9 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 10 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 11 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 12 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 13 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 14 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 15 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 16 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 17 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 18 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 19 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 20 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 21 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 22 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 23 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 24 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 25 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 26 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 27 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 28 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 29 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 30 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 31 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 32 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 33 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 34 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 35 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 36 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 37 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 38 of 39

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1

Filed 09/28/10 Page 39 of 39

District Clerk Refused to "scan and file" Exhibits 1-15 to Complaint (Doc. 1)
Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit 5: I0-cv-00503-WTH-TBS
Doc. 2 - 09-28-10, Exhibits I through 15 and ADA Assessment & Report re I Complaint
Note: The District Clerk refused to put any of the exhibits 1-15 shown below on the Case
Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system in violation of the Court's Administrative
Procedures Order, No. 6:07-MC-0027-0RL-19, by Chief Judge Patricia C. Fawsett, signed February
28, 2007. The Court's CM/ECF Order requires pro se to file in paper format unless authorized to file
electronically, but provides no information on how to obtain authorization.
"III(C) PRO SE FILER: Unless authorized to file electronically, a pro se filer shall file any
pleading and other paper in paper format. The Clerk will scan and file these papers
electronically and will also maintain a paper file of such documents. If authorized by the
assigned Judge, a party proceeding pro se may file electronically. If authorized to file
electronically, the pro se filer must follow these procedures."

Plaintiff's Motion to File Electronically (Doc. 6) was denied (Doc. 17). See Consolidated Notice of
Pro Se Electronic Case Filing Prohibition by District Court, which appears at Exhibit 4 to Motion to
Apply Funds Toward Filing Fees (Doc. 70). See my letter to Sheryl Loesch April 15, 2012 which
appears at Exhibit 8 to Consolidated Notice ofPro Se Electronic Case Filing Prohibition by District
Court.(Doc. 70, Exhibit 4). No response yet from District Clerk Loesch.

LIST OF EXHIBITS TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc.

I) 5:IO-cv-00503-WTH-(DAB)-TBS

Exhibit I

Complaint for Breach of Contract, Fraud, 05-CA-007205, Aug-I 1-2005

Exhibit 2

Answer, Affirmative Defense, Counterclaim, 05-CA-007205, Feb-19-2005

Exhibit 3

Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint, and Motion, 05-CA-007205, May-05-20 I 0

Exhibit 4

Emergency Motion to Disqualify Defendants' Counsel RCR & BRC

Exhibit 5

DOIwrestling.com - Declaration of Independents, Rodems comments

Exhibit 6

PROFESSIONALISM AND LITIGATION ETHICS, 28 Stetson L. Rev. 323

Exhibit 7

Plaintiffs Accommodation Request, ADA, February 20, 2007

Exhibit 8

Plaintiffs Amended Accommodation Request, ADA, March 5, 2007

Exhibit 9

Robert W. Bauer letter, July 24, 2008

Exhibit 10

Notice of Filing, Affidavit ofNJG, Bauer's email, don't attend hearings

Exhibit II

July 9, 2010 ADA letter from David A. Rowland

Exhibit 12

Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, September 27,2010, Judge Cook falsified Rodems disqualiforder

Exhibit 13

Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, September 27, 2010, Judge Cook falsified ADA

Exhibit 14

Judge Cook's "Res Judicata Motions"

Exhibit 15

Notice of Filing, Notice of Claim, 768.28 Florida Statutes, July 12, 20 10