Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AT
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
GUINDY
CHENNAI
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
In the partial fulfillment of the requirement
For the award of degree
of
Bonafide certificate
Certified that this project report titled CREDIT APPRAISAL
SYSTEM ,Is the Bonafide work of Mr./MsG.MEERA Who
Signature
Of HOD.
...
Acknowledgment
I also thank to the administration and faculty of SRM University, for having
required this project from me, as it has provided an invaluable experience to
me.
I am also thankful to my friends who were a moral support for me from the
very beginning of the project in all circumstances.
Last but not the least i thank the Almighty for the successful completion of
this project.
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO
1.
TITLE
LIST OF TABLES
2.
PAGE
NO
2
3
CHAPTER - I
INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
CHAPTER - II
5
5
7
8
9.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER - III
10
10.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER - IV
11
11.
12.
INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER - V
15
20
13.
31
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
FINDINGS
SUGGESTIONS
CONCLUSION
APPENDICES
BIBLIOGAPHY
64
70
72
73
82
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
LIST OF TABLES
S.NO
List of tables
P.NO
1.
37
2.
38
3.
40
4.
41
5.
60
LIST OF CHARTS
S.NO
List of charts
P.NO
1.
44
2.
46
3.
47
4.
48
5.
49
6.
50
7.
51
8.
52
9.
54
10.
55
11.
56
12.
57
13.
58
14.
58
15.
59
16.
62
17.
63
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Options
Inputs
Its important to ensure that all the necessary people and resources are
in place to deliver the project. This may mean thinking about funding from
various sources and other inputs, such as volunteer help or premises.
Appraisal should include the examination of appropriately detailed budgets.
10
All financial tools which are applied in this appraisal have their own
limitations.
11
RE
REVIEW
W OF
O
LIT
L ER
RAT
TUR
RE
E
Credit Appraisal,
A
R Analyysis And Decision
Risk
D
M
Making
by D D
Mukherrjee.
1
12
13
CHAPTER - III
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
14
(A)Research method
(B)Target population:
The target population in this research refers to any one of the client of
the particular branch of Indian Overseas Bank.
Sampling:
15
(A)Sampling plan:
The sample plan was implemented by seeking help from the bank
officials.
(B)Sampling methodology:
The data consists of primary data from the Bank Officials.
The data also consists of secondary data in the form of
The sample size is restricted to studying just one of the client of the branch
of IOB. The client can be from any background- small, medium or large and
also can be a manufacturing, trading or a service organization.
For the purpose of the project, a large manufacturing company was selected.
16
CHAPTER - IV
INDUSTRY PROFILE
17
The development of banking is not only the root but also the result
of the development of the business world." Due to considerable efforts of the
government, today we have a number of banks such as Reserve Bank of
India, State Bank of India, nationalized commercial banks, Industrial Banks
and cooperative banks. Indian Banks contribute a lot to the development of
agriculture, and trade and industrial sectors.
Without a sound and effective banking system in India it cannot have
a healthy economy.
HISTORY OF BANKING IN INDIA
Banking in India originated in the last decades of the 18th century.
PHASES OF BANKS:
1) Early phase from 1786 to 1969 of Indian Banks.
2) Nationalization of Indian Banks and up to 1991 prior to Indian
banking sector reforms.
3) New phase of Indian Banking System with the advent of Indian
Financial & Banking Sector Reforms after 1991.
18
19
Allahabad Bank
Andhra Bank
Bank of Baroda
Bank of India
Bank of Maharastra
Canara Bank
Central Bank of India
Corporation Bank
Dena Bank
IDBI Bank
Indian Bank
Indian Overseas Bank
Oriental Bank of Commerce
Punjab & Sind Bank
Punjab National Bank
Syndicate Bank
UCO Bank
Union Bank of India
United Bank of India
Vijaya Bank
20
List of State Bank of India and its subsidiary, a Public Sector Banks
Among the Public Sector Banks in India, United Bank of India is one of the
14 major banks which were nationalised on July 19, 1969. Its predecessor, in
the Public Sector Banks, the United Bank of India Ltd., was formed in 1950
with the amalgamation of four banks viz. Comilla Banking Corporation Ltd.
(1914), Bengal Central Bank Ltd. (1918), Comilla Union Bank Ltd. (1922)
and Hooghly Bank Ltd. (1932).
21
COMPANY PROFILE
22
Type
Industry
Banking
Capital Markets and
allied industries
Founded
Products
Website
www.iob.in
23
IOB was one of the 14 major banks that was nationalized in 1969. On
the eve of Nationalization in 1969, IOB had 195 branches in India
with
44.90 Crs.
24
ORGANISA
ATION ST
TRUCTU
URE OF IN
NDIAN OV
VERSEAS
S BANK
2
25
1.
Shri.S.A.Bhat
2.
Shri.Y.L.Madan
3.
Smt.Nupur mitra
4.
Dr.Vinita Kumar
5.
Smt.Chitra
chandramouliswaran
6.
Shri.N.Sridharan
7.
Shri.B.V.Appa rao
8.
Shri.Suraj khatri
9.
Shri.A.k.Bhargava
Current Account:
Savings Accounts:
Fixed Deposit:
Recurring Deposit:
Loans:
26
27
28
Lending committee
At the corporate office the final assessment is to be done &
decision is taken to reject the application is forwarded to the
particular branch from where the application has been received.
Before it also lending committee decide whether to give loan or not.
Example
Loan for more than 10 lac Rs all BOD need to agree for that
particular Loan.
Also some of the lending committee is formed by bank in
which Directors are included and they decide whether to give
Loan or not.
29
The branches have the power to take the major decision on the
sanctioning of the loan if it is less than Rs 1 lack.
Documentation of loan application
Once the Loan is Sanction Banks need to check all the document
of borrower as well as guarantor once again and only than and than they can
proceed ahead.
Disbursement of loan
If loan is sanction than Bank open the account of borrower in their
bank and issue the check. Before the entire term loan is disbursed the
borrowers must fully comply with all terms and condition of the loan
agreement.
Creation of security
The term loans (both rupee and foreign currency) and the
differed guarantee assistance provided by the All-India
financial institutions are secured through the first mortgage, by
way of deposit of title deeds of immovable properties and
hypothecation of movable properties.
As the creation of mortgage, particularly in the case of land,
tends to be a time consuming process, the institutions permit
interim disbursement against alternate security (institution the
form of guarantees provided by the promoters).
The mortgage, however, has to be created within a year from
the date of the first disbursement.
30
The first step in project analysis is to estimate the potential size of the
market for the product proposal and gets an idea about the market share that
is likely to be capture. Market and demand analysis is concerned with two
broad issues:
What is the likely aggregate demand for the product/service?
What share of the market will the proposed project achieve?
Demand forecasting
Market planning
31
Manufacturing process/technology
Product mix
Plant capacity
Work schedule
32
Financial Analysis
Cost of project
Means of financing
33
CHAPTER - V
DATA ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
34
Profitability index
RATIO ANALYSIS
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Proprietary ratio
35
CASE STUDY
XY COMPANY PROFILE
Since the beginning, the company has been availing credit limits for both
term funding and WC purposes under multiple banking arrangement. The
long term requirement of the bank was met by the bank along with another
reputed bank
The company has been enjoying credit facilities with the bank for the past
ten years. Besides IOB, the company has availed the facility from some of
the other top financial institutions as well.
Purpose of loan:
XY pvt ltd requires a term loan for the expansion and purchase of
machinery as a part of development of the company.
Project profile:
Name of the unit
: XY PVT LTD
36
Address
Constitution
: NA
Registration Date
: 19TH NOVEMBER 96
EXPERIENCE
DIRECTORS
Mr.X
Managing
48
Director
Mr.Y
Director
44
experience in
this line of
activity
Nature of project
XY ltd is considering
Expansion of the unit by constructing a factory building.
Development of prototype higher capacity 12HP engine.
Installation of new machinery.
Cost of project and means of finance:
The cost of project will be around Rs.4.80 crores which include cost
of installation of new machine and other expenses. The company also
applied for loan to other banks to cover rest of the amount. Loan sanctioned
by IOB is 4.80
37
Any other firm or branch which is presently being run by the partners:
XY Pressure Castings.
XY Accessories Ltd.
Security Offered against the loan:
Primary
: Hypothecation of machineries.
Collateral
:EM
of
Land
at
(1) Mr. X
Age: 48 years
Cast: Hindu
Business: Mfg of portable engines, Pump sets, Sprayers
& other Agricultural Implements.
(2) Mr. Y
Age: 40 years
Cast: Hindu
Business: Mfg of portable engines, Pump sets, Sprayers
& other Agricultural Implements.
38
Capital budgeting uses the concept of present value to select the projects.
Capital Budgeting Tools:
The following are the capital budgeting tools used for appraisal process.
Net Present Value
Profitability Index
Payback Period
39
TABLE 1:YEAR
CFAT
CUMULATIVE
CFAT
2006-07 65.25
65.25
2007-08 49.69
114.94
2008-09 54.60
169.54
2009-10 156.23
325.77
2010-11 255.07
572.53
40
PAT
2006-07 25.93
2007-08 16.38
2008-09 30.82
2009-10 108.23
2010-11 145.07
TOTAL 318.07
41
Inference:
This project can be accepted as the actual ARR is higher than the
minimum desired ARR. Here the actual ARR is higher than the cut off
rate that is 5%. So the project should be accepted.
3. NET PRESENT VALUE:
NPV is an indicator of how much value an investment or project adds to the
value of the firm.
If
NPV > 0
It means
NPV < 0
Then...
investment
accepted
would
should
indifferent
in
be
the
decision whether to
accept or reject the
the
NPV = 0
investment
would
no
monetary
Decision
should be based on
other
criteria,
e.g.
strategic positioning
or other factors not
explicitly included in
42
the calculation.
TABLE 3 :YEAR
CFAT
PV @ 5% PV OF
CFAT
2006-07 65.25
0.952
62.12
2007-08 49.69
0.907
45.07
2008-09 54.60
0.864
47.17
2009-10 156.23
0.823
128.58
2010-11 255.07
0.784
199.97
482.91
Initial Investment
480.00
(+)2.91
accepted. Here NPV is greater than 0 i.e. 2.91 (in lac), it means it would
add more value to the firm and proposal is feasible so it should be
accepted.
4. INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN:
The internal rate of return is a capital budgeting matrix used by the firm to
decide whether they should make investment or not. A project is good
investment proposition if IRR is greater than the rate of return. In general if
IRR is greater than the cost of capital, the project will add value for the
money.
43
TABLE 4:YEAR
CFAT
PV@6%
PV
OF PV@4%
CFAT
PV
OF
CFAT
2006-07
65.25
0.943
61.53
0.962
62.77
2007-08
49.69
0.890
44.22
0.925
45.96
2008-09
54.60
0.840
45.86
0.889
48.54
2009-10
156.23
0.792
123.73
0.855
133.58
2010-11
255.07
0.747
190.54
0.822
209.67
TOTAL
465.88
500.52
44
5. PROFITABILITY INDEX:
Profitability index identifies the relationship of investment to payoff
of a proposed project.
Profitability index is a good tool for ranking projects because it allows
you to clearly identify the amount of value created per unit of investment,
thus if you are capital constrained, you wish to invest in those projects which
create value most efficiently first. The project will qualify for acceptance if
the PI exceeds one.
The ratio is calculated as follows:
Inference:
The PI of this project is 1.006 % which is equal to 1. Therefore this
project is feasible and it will create value for the firm so it should be
accepted.
RATIO ANALYSIS
45
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIOS
Ratios serve as a tool for financial analysis and they are classified on the
basis of their function and purpose.
Ratios
Profitability
R.O.I
Turnover
Stockturn
over
Drs.turn
over
Crs.Turn
over
Financial
W.capital
turnover
F.Assets
tuanover
Sh.term
Solvency
Solvency
Lg.term
solvency
N.Profit
Current
ratio
Proprietary
ratio
G.Profit
Liquidity
ratio
Debteq
ratio
Exp.ratio
Cash.Pos.
ratio
F.Assets
ratio
Op.Profit
Capgear
ratio
46
The ideal C.R. is 2:1.It means that C.A is twice than its C.L and
this is generally considered to have good short-term financial
strength means the company may not have problems meeting its
short-term obligations.
CR= Current Assets/ Current liabilities
2006-07 = 1264.59 / 1088.43 = 1.16.
2007-08 = 1197.21 / 1056.92 = 1.13
2008-09 = 1406.82 / 1141.83 = 1.23
2009-10 = 2274.03 / 1927.80 = 1.18
2010-11 = 3066.79 / 2511.80 = 1.22.
0.8
RUPEES
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
YEAR
47
Inference:
Current ratio, though below the benchmark level, is hovering around
1.20.The CR is fluctuating from 2006-07 but in 2010-11 it is quite high
compared to the previous year, so it shows good capabilities of the firm
in meeting the current obligation. So it suggests that project should be
accepted.
2. QUICK RATIO:
Quick Ratio measures the ability of a company to use its quick assets
to immediately extinguish its current liabilities.
Quick Ratio of 1:1 is considered satisfactory. It refers that liquid
Assets are equal to C.L.
The Ratio less than 1:1 shows the companies condition to be unsound
& the higher ratio shows good financial position.
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
YEAR
Inference:
Here, in all five years, the ratio is nearer to the original standard
that is 1:1. So it is found to be quite satisfactory and it suggests that
project should be accepted.
3. PROPREITORY RATIO:
Proprietary ratio shows the relationship between shareholders
funds and total assets.
The ideal proprietory ratio is 1:3.
It means companys Total Assets should be 3 times more than
its Owners Fund.
PROPRITARY RATIO = Shareholders fund
Total Assets
49
2006-07 = 291.11/1488
= 0.20
= 0.21
2010-11
19%
2009-10
18%
2006-07
18%
2007-08
21%
2008-09
24%
Inference:
Here in all three years company's Shareholder Fund is less compare to
its total assets. So it is good for the firm and project should be accepted.
4. DEBT EQUITY RATIO:
50
= 0.10
= 0.18
RUPEES
Inference:
Here in all years the ratios are less than 2:1 so this implies high safety
margin for the creditors and the firm would be able to meet the
creditors claims. So the project should be accepted.
51
2006-07 = 176.16%
2007-08 = 140.29%
2008-09 = 264.99%
2009-10 =346.23 %
2010-11 = 554.99%
265
346.2
555
YEAR
Inference:
The ratio shows that the company has good working capital in hand to
meet its obligations and it also increasing gradually and hence the
project looks feasible.
52
= 13.52
CHART 6:
RUPEES
200708
200809
200910
201011
YEAR
53
Inference:
In all the above years the GP ratio is fluctuating resulting to instability.
The reason may be due to increase in the cost of goods sold thereby
decreasing the value of the sales.
2. NET PROFIR RATIO:
= 1.20.
= 0.94
= 0.82
= 1.90
0.94
0.82
1.7
1.9
YEAR
54
Inference:
Here in all 5 years, ratios are increasing. So this shows the good ability
of firm over control it costs and its profitability so the project should be
accepted.
3. OPERATING PROFIT RATIO:
This ratio is the test of the operational efficiency with which the
business is being carried.
Operating profit ratio = op .costs / net sales * 100.
Operating cost = Cost of goods sold + op. exp/ net sales * 100
2006-07 = 46.81 / 2161.76
= 2.17
= 1.47
= 1.10
= 3.29
RUPEES
1.5
YEAR
1
0.5
0
1
YEAR
55
Inference:
The operating ratio should be low enough to leave a portion of sales to
give a fair return to the investors. Compared to other years 2010-11 is
very high thus decreasing the efficiency of the comapany. The increase
may be due to increase in overhead and other financial charges and the
management should check the increase.
Return on capital employed = Net Profit Before Interest & Tax *100
Total Capital Employed
2006-07 = 130.80/ 365.71 = 36%
2007-08 = 131.08/ 295.74 = 44%
2008-09 = 162.70/436.28
= 37%
2009-10 = 382.89/989.78
= 39%
56
40
RUPEES
30
20
10
0
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
YEAR
Inference:
Here the ratios are increasing in each year so it shows the good
efficiency of capital employed to be used which will generate good
revenue. It means projected loan will generate good revenue for the
firm.
(iii) FINANCIAL RATIOS:
(i) Tangible net worth = net working capital - intangible assets
57
CHART 10:
TANGIBLE NETWORTH
800
600
400
200
RUPEES
0
2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 201007 08 09 10 11
YEAR
Inference:
The net worth of the company is increasing over years and the entire
profit earned by the company is retained to improve the net worth of
the company and hence the proposal should be accepted.
58
0.1
0.19
0.82
0.62
YEAR
Inference:
The ratio has increased in the last two years which is quite high when
comparing to the previous years. Lower the ratio higher the solvency
position of the company. The ratio is not satisfactory and is expected to
decrease in the future.
2006-07 = 0.39%
2007-08 = 0.10%
2008-09 = 0.19%
2009-10 = 0.82%
2010-11 = 0.62%
59
CHART 12:-
FUNDED DEBT/TNW
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
YEAR
Inference:-
The long term debt and the total outside liabilities are quite low
compared to equity. Hence, the financial position of the unit is good.
2006-07 = 8.64%
2007-08 = -19.68%
2008-09 = 57.97%
2009-10 =134.28%
2010-11 = 19.81%
60
15
10
5
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
YEAR
61
15
RUPEES
10
5
0
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
YEAR
62
Working capital is defined, as the funds required carrying the required levels
of current assets to enable the unit to carry on its operations at the expected
levels uninterruptedly.
The ratio indicates the number of times the working capital is turned
over in the course of the year.
The ratio measures the efficiency with which the working capital is
used by the firm.
ii.
Particular
CURRENT ASSETS
1. Inventories
2006-
2007-08
07
279.31
360.08
2008-
2009-
09
10
474.10
381.19
2010-11
575.00
63
2.Debtors
886.93
708.55
765.85
1719.0
2300
0
3. Cash& Bank Balance
7.69
31.11
71.36
13.84
11.79
4. Expenses
0.87
0.22
5. Loans& Advances
54.57
84.99
93.11
90
100
6. Others
35.22
12.26
70
80
TOTAL
1264.5
1197.21
1406.8
2274.0
3066.79
388.59
1008.0
9
Less: CURRENT
LIABILITIES
7.Borrowings from IOB
393.42
1300
0
8. From other banks
296.52
97.59
35.67
9. Commercial paper
25.25
636.97
385.75
579.96
767
1000
27.48
17.22
12.41
41.42
89.91
94.57
30
40
10.Crs
28.56
28.56
23.65
56.80
76.80
14. Others
32.23
44.47
6.98
66
95
64
TOTAL
1088.43 1056.92
NET WORKING
176.16
264.99
140.29
346.23
554.99
CAPITAL
2006-07 = 10.28%
2007-08 = 10.28%
2008-09 =8.95%
2009-10 =16.06%
2010-11 = 11.88%
CHART 16:WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO
18
16
14
12
10
8
RUPEES
6
4
2
0
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
year
65
Inference:
The ratio has increased gradually showing effective utilization of
working capital by the company. The companys current assets is more
than that of current liabilities and hence there is less chance of the ratio
to decrease.
(ii)
2006-07 = 12.27%
2007-08 = 12.38%
2008-09 =10.35%
2009-10 =18.38%
2010-11 = 13.73%
CHART 17:-
CASH TO NWC
20
18
16
14
%
12
10
RUPEES
8
6
4
2
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
YEAR
Inference:
The ratio measures the efficiency with which the working capital is used
by the firm. It shows that the company is maintaining the working
capital efficiently.
66
RISK ANALYSIS
RAM RATING
RISK
PARAMETER
Industry
Business
Fiancial
Management
Overall
Rating
EXISTING
SME - 3
REVISED
INTERIM
SME - 3
SME - 2
SME 7
SME 2
SME - 3
67
CHAPTER - VI
68
CAPITAL BUDGETING
The percentage of ARR is very high which is said to be good for the
company as it is expected to give good return for the money invested
in the business.
NET PRESENT VALUE:
Net present value 2.91> 0, which is said to be a very good for the
company. Companies will generally accept a project with (+) NPV
and hence this project will add more value to the firm.
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN:
IRR shows 5.18% which is a good percentage that this project gives
and it is also a favorable one to accept this proposal.
PROFITABILITY INDEX:
RATIO ANALYSIS
(I) LIQUIDITY RATIOS:
(i) CURRENT RATIO:
The CR is fluctuating and it is quite high compared to the previous years
so it shows good capabilities of the firm in meeting the current
obligation.
(ii) QUICK RATIO:
The ratio is nearer to the original standard that is 1:1 and it is found to
be Satisfactory.
(iii) PROPREITORY RATIO:
The company's Shareholder Fund( liability) should always be less
compared to its total assets and this ratio is more favorable to the
company.
( iv) DEBT EQUITY RATIO:
The ratio is low thereby showing high safety margin for the creditors
and the company will be able to meet its claims.
On the whole the liquidity ratios are satisfactory. They also compare
favorably with industry average.
(II) PROFITABILITY RATIOS:
70
The ratio shows that the company has good control on the costs and
its profitability as it is increasing over years.
( iv) OPERATING RATIO:
71
The current ratio shows that the current assets are more than the
Current liability which will not affect the proportion of Current
ratio.
72
SU
UGGE
EST
TION
NS
73
SUGGESTIONS
74
CONCLUSION
75
CONCLUSION
As per the analysis done the result that has been got is good
enough to justify that this Proposal has all the required
Criterias and Qualities required by the bank. And it is also
expected to give a very good return and value to the company.
The financial tools used for assessing is more appropriate to
this project and the values are also favorable to the company to
be considered by the bank for sanctioning the loan.
I like to conclude by saying that this Project Proposal should be
accepted as it is seems to be good and looks more feasible by
satisfying the criteria of the bank.
76
APPENDICES
Projected Profitability Working For 5 Years
PARTICULARS
(Rs.In
(Rs.In
(Rs.In
(Rs.In
lac)
lac)
lac)
lac)
(Rs.In lac)
1. NET SALES
Audited
Projection
2063.17 1745.41
2631
6394
7673
258.6
176.7
111.27
108
119
160.01
185.68
140
170
6362
7622
2.COST OF SALES
Opening stock finished goods
108.3
83.63
242.98
14.8
19.06
progress
33.95
66.67
61.6
95.3
80.48
129
117.09
258.4
266.83
5040
6000
Stores consumed
469.03
389.25
435.72
520
695
Manufacturing Exp
77
Depreciation
39.32
33.31
23.83
48
90
goods
83.63
76.42
192.05
19.06
50
66.67
166.56
95.3
155
129
117.09
282.05
266.83
370
1442.1 2370.79
5561.61
6591.19
5565.87
6622.13
1811.5
3.GROSS
PROFIT(+)/LOSS(-)
350.26
294.33
372.28
800.39
1030.81
259.99
199.83
239.8
475
570
43.46
68.99
102.19
154
210.83
303.45
268.82
341.99
629
780.03
46.81
25.51
30.29
171.39
256.78
0.32
1.09
4. SELLING&
ADMIN.EXP.
5.INTEREST & FIN
CHARGES
TOTAL(4+5)
6.OPERATING
PROFIT/LOSS
7.(i) OTHER INCOME
Sale of Scrap
Interest received
0
1.45
78
Others
0.89
2.18
4.94
1.21
3.27
6.39
11
20
Others
20
1.21
3.27
6.39
-9
48.02
28.78
36.68
180.39
241.78
PROVISION
22.09
12.4
14.22
72.16
96.71
25.93
16.8
22.46
108.23
145.07
11.N.P BEFORE
87.34
62.09
60.51
228.39
331.78
7.(ii)LESS OTHER
EXPENSES
8.PROFIT BEFORE
TAX/LOSS
9.INCOME TAX
79
DEP&TAX
12.N.P BEFORE DEP .TAX
&INT
130.8
131.08
162.7
382.39
541.81
13.CASH GENERATION
65.25
49.69
46.29
156.23
255.07
16.RETAINED PROFIT
25.93
16.38
22.46
108.23
145.07
65.25
49.69
46.29
156.23
255.07
14.DIVIDEND
15.PREFERENCE
DIVIDEND
129
117.1
282.05
266.83
370
Stock in progress
66.67
166.56
192.05
95.3
155
Finished Goods
83.64
76.42
19.06
50
279.31
360.08
474.1
381.19
575
886.93
708.55
767.85
1719
2300
Consumable spares
TOTAL INVENTORIES
80
886.93
708.55
767.85
1719
2300
7.69
31.11
71.36
13.84
11.79
Prepaid Expenses
0.87
0.22
0.4
54.57
84.99
93.11
90
100
Others
35.22
12.26
70
80
98.35
128.58
164.87
173.84
191.79
2274.03
3066.79
Advance Tax
Deposits with Exise & Sales
Tax
SUB TOTAL(a)
46.17
47.72
64.08
385.31
385.31
184.13
179.71
186.56
366.56
376.56
(iii)Sundries
118.16
120.95
137.41
156.05
166.05
348.46
348.38
388.05
907.92
927.92
168.62
201.93
225.76
273.37
363.87
179.84
146.45
162.29
634.55
564.05
81
9.71
10.85
15.92
28.67
10
10
5.68
7.93
Assets
28.49
24.92
43.35
19
19
SUB TOTAL
28.49
24.92
43.35
19
19
61.71
53.99
15.21
12.24
15.14
50
60
2977.58
3709.84
1.3.NON- CURRENT
ASSETS
(i)Investment in/loans to
subsidies
(ii)Others Non Current Assets
Investment in other
companies
loans and advances
Overdue Debtors
Others
Total Other Non Current
TOTAL
ASSETS(a+b+c+d+e)
82
2.LIABILITIES
2009-10
2010-11
2.1.CURRENT
LIABILITIES
393.42
388.59
1008
1300
296.52
97.59
35.67
Commercial Paper
25.25
Sub-Total
321.77
491.01
424.26
1008
1300
636.97
385.75
579.96
767
1000
27.48
17.22
12.41
41.42
89.91
94.57
30
40
28.56
28.56
23.65
56.8
76.8
32.23
44.47
6.98
66
95
129.69
180.16
137.61
152.8
211.8
1927.8
2511.8
380.92
344.12
Outstanding expenses
Others
Total other Current Liabilities
(iv)Creditors On Capital
Account
SUB-TOTAL(e)
2.2.DEFERRED
LIABILITIES
(i)Term loan from IOB
2.56
83
39.29
4.7
Preference shares
9.32
9.5
9.5
banks
NCD borrowings
42.75
69.3
26.95
29.94
60
80
69.3
26.95
72.69
60
80
108.59
34.21
82.01
450.42
433.62
(i)Paid up capital
186.76
230.66
417.76
442.76
462.76
104.35
120.74
39.99
156.6
301.66
(iii)Revaluation Reserves
291.11
351.4
457.75
599.36
764.42
2977.58
3709.84
Others
Other l.liability take as quasi
equity
Total other l. term liabilities
SUB-TOTAL(f)
2.3 CAPITAL &SURPLUS
SUB-TOTAL(g)
Deferred tax liability(h)
TOTAL
LIABILITIES(e+f+g+h)
Off Balance Sheet Debt
Current Portion of L.t Debt
28.56
28.56
23.65
56.8
76.8
84
BIBLIOGRAPHY
85
WEBSITES:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project appraisal tech
Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPV/IRR/ARR/PI/PB
http://www.banknetindia.com
www.indianimagesbank.com/
www.indianbanksguide.com
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banks_in_India
Finance.indiamart.com/investment_in_india/banks.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banking_in_India
www.mckinsey.com/.../india/mckinseyonindia/.../india_banking_2
010.
86