Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic Functions
Drilling Hydraulics
Foam
Liquid
Mud Rheology
ppg kg/dm 3 SG
sec
cP -lb/100 ft2
lb/100 ft2
vol%
Density
Plastic Viscosity
Yield point
Gel strength
Acidity (pH)
Filtration
Chloride Content
Alkalinity
Calcium content
Solids content
Marsh Funnel
The time required for 1 U.S. quart (or 946 cm3 ) of fluid to drain through a
funnel.
Shear rate :
D=
Shear stress :
Principle of
Rotational Viscosimeter
T=
v (m/s)
d (m)
1/s
F (lb)
= lb/100ft2
A (100 ft 2 )
6-speed
Rotating Cylinder
Viscosimeter
Fann Model 35
viscosimeter
6-speed
Rotating Cylinder
Viscosimeter
T = f (D)
The parameters of this function depend on the selected fluid mod el :
Fann Model 35
viscosimeter
RheologicalModels(3)
From the shear stress and shear rate the viscosity can be calculated :
= T/D
Newtonic
Bingham-plastic
Power Law (pseudoplastic)
Yield-Power Law
Casson
Newtonic Model
t
Relationship :
D
T
T=
xD
lb/100 ft2
R600 - R300
viscosity, P, cP
shear rate,1/s
shear stress,lb/100ft2
Bingham-Plastic Model
Relationship :
T = PV x D + YP
511
a
511
1022
300
600
D
1/s
rpm
lb/100 ft2
lb/100 ft2
R600 - R300
a
511
YP
YP
D
511
1022
300
600
1/s
rpm
511
1022
300
600
D
1/s
rpm
T = K x Dn
511
511
1022
300
600
D
1/s
rpm
To calculate n :
n = tan
f
K
To calculate K :
K = (300rpm reading) / 511n [lb-sn/100 ft2]
3.0095
300
600
1/s
rpm
log D
2.7084
t
lb/100 ft2
511
Y
511
1022
300
600
Best fits :
Bingham Plastic model for oil- based mud systems
Power Law model for water-, synthetic-oil or petrofree
fluid based mud systems
shear rate
511
1022
300
600
1/s
rpm
D
1/s
rpm
Time-Dependent Behavior
Most drilling fluids exhibit time-dependent
behavior.
Shear Stress is dependent on duration of
shear. Why?
Clay plates or fibers are broken into smaller
particles at higher rates of shear.
These small particles aggregate into layer
units as shear rate is decreased again.
Both of these events take a considerable
length of time.
Gel Strength
Gel strength describes the time-dependent flow behavior of a drilling
fluid.
Flow Regimes
Plug Flow
Flow Regimes
Laminar Flow
Velocity
VMAX
0
Radius
Flow Regimes
Turbulent Flow
Fluid moves as a plug essentially, due to the chaotic, random shearing
motion
Only near the walls of the pipe does an orderly shear exist (laminar boundary
layer)
Velocity gradient is very steep near the walls but essentially flat elsewhere formed by eddies
Velo city
VMAX
0
Radiu s
Flow
Regime
Comparison
F
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
D
r
i
L
L
P
i
p
e
Pipe diameter
F
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Nre =
d
v
MW
v = q/A
Typically, this is 1000 ft/min (300 m/min). Is it laminar or turbulent ?
1000 d v MW
Mud Pumps
l
Mud Pumps
Qt
n
L
D
d
liter/min
Qt
n
L
D
Mud Pumps
Volumetric efficiencies
Single Acting pumps = 95% - 98%
Double Acting pump = 90%
Efficiency is affected by :
Discharge pressure
Pump operating speed
Suction line design
Fluid aeration
Mechanical wear
liter/min
Mud Pumps
l
Volumetric efficiency
v = Qout/Qt
Qout
Qt
Mud Pumps
l
Mud Pumps
Hydraulic power
PQ
600
Ph =
Ph =
PQ
447.50
kW
hp
m
v
Hydraulic Design
Select flow rate
Vaverage =
Q
Dh
Dp
4000 x Q
3.14(Dh2 - Dp2)
m/min
Vc =
PV
YP
Dh,Dp
MW
plastic viscosity, cP
yield point, lb/100 sq.ft
hole size, pipe diameter, inch
mud weight, kg/l
Flow Regimes
Vc =
m/min
Dpi x MW
PV
YP
Dpi
MW
plastic viscosity, cP
yield point, lb/100 sq.ft
pipe internal diameter, inch
mud weight, kg/l
PaL =
L
Q
Dh
Dp
PV x L x Q
40863(Dh+Dp)(Dh - Dp) 3
YP x L
bar
1326 (Dh - Dp)
length of section, m
flow rate, l/min
diameter of hole, inch
diameter of pipe, inch
PpL =
PV
YP
L
Q
D
PV x L x Q
61295 D4
YP x L
1326 D
plastic viscosity, cP
yield point, lb/100 sq.ft
length of section, m
flow rate, l/min
inside diameter of pipe, inch
bar
m/min
PaT =
bar
PpT =
PV
L
Q
MW
Dh
Dp
plastic viscosity, cP
length of section, m
flow rate, l/min
mud weight, kg/liter
diameter of hole, inch
diameter of pipe, inch
PV
L
Q
MW
D
plastic viscosity, cP
length of section, m
flow rate, l/min
mud weight, kg/liter
inside diameter of pipe, inch
ECD = MW +
Pa
0.0981 x L
300 fps (100 m/s) jet velocity (or less in soft formations)
48-65% of the pump pressure as bit pressure loss
MW
length of annulus, m
Bit Hydraulics
Bit Hydraulics
To calculate jet velocity ...
Vj =
Q
TFA
16.666 Q
TFA
Pb =
Q
MW
C
TFA
1.465 Q2 MW
C 2 TFA2
bar
or
BHHP = 447.50
Qj
Bit Hydraulics
l
Pb x Qj
HSI =1.836
hp/ in2
Db2
Pb
Qj
Db
bit size, mm
MUD FLOW
PIPE
MOVEMENT
hp
SWAB
SURGE
Calculation Procedure
Example : Calculate the mud velocity when tripping 5 inch (127 mm) drill pipe
from an 8-1/2 inch (215.9 mm) hole at an average pipe speed of 186 fpm (56.7
m/min).
vm = (0.45 + (52 / (8.52 - 52))) (186)(1.5)
or 56.7 m/min
Find the surge/swab pressure for an equivalent circulating rate of 520 gpm when
tripping 9,000 feet of 5 inch drill pipe from an 8-1/2 inch hole. The mud weight is
13.0 ppg.
Find the annular pressure loss gradient for 13.0 ppg mud weight
Psi/1000 ft = 39
Calculate the annular pressure loss with 9,000 ft of drill pipe in hole
(39 psi/1000 ft) (9,000 ft) = 351 psi
The surge/swab pressure = 351 psi
The equivalent densities :
Example : Find the equivalent circulating rate for a 273 fpm (83.2 m/min) mud
velocity inside an 8-1/2 inch (215.9 mm) hole around 5 inch (127 mm) drill pipe.
GPM = 520 gpm
LPM = 1966 lit/min
Depth
Hole size
Pipe size
Pipe acceleration and velocity
Mud weight
Mud rheology
Gel strength
Mud cake thickness
Slip Velocity
N Res =
d Vs MW
eff
It is the rate at which cuttings fall back to the bottom of the hole in
static mud
For efficient hole cleaning, the average velocity (or annular velocity)
should be at least twice that of the slip velocity
d
Vs
MW
eff
particle diameter, cm
slip velocity, cm/s
mud weight, g/cm3
effective viscosity, P
Slip Velocity
Slip Velocity
If
If If
x 60
6.65 x YP x (Dh - Dp) + PV x Vavg
fpm
Sv = 0.2 x
Transport Efficiency
TE =
Va - Vs
Va
x 100 %
fpm
Issues
l
l
l
l
l
l
Mud Properties
Circulating System
Requirements :
Requirements :
Low solids, and particularly low sand content
Fresh water mud,or low aromatics OBM
Good rheologyfor low pressure losses, but efficient cuttings
transport
Low friction coefficient in high angle/horizontal holes
Hole Cleaning
l
0 - 10
low
10 - 30
intermediate
30 - 60
high
60 <
Hole Cleaning
Problem Indicators
l
Hole Cleaning
l 30 to 60 degrees inclination :
Problems :
Cuttings bed formation tendency
Cuttings move as a bed or by saltation at bed/mud interface
Back sliding and packing off (at circulation stops)
Strategies :
Circulate cuttings above the critical inclination range on connections
Minimize circulation stops
Frequent short trips with backreaming
High pump rates
Frequent low-vis pills in turbulence followed by high vis sweeps
Hole Cleaning
l Source of increased torque and drag in high angle holes :
Wellbore contact on the HS of the hole
The wellbore is not clean, drill stem moves in a solid bed
Drillstring movement across rock fragments and filter cake on the LS
conventional lubricants offer little relief (use mechanical addi tives)
best to keep hole clean in the high angle section
cuttings form in valleys reducing effective hole size
0 to 30 degrees inclination :
Hole Cleaning
l 60 to 90 degrees inclination :
Problems :
Cuttings bed formation
Insufficient mud velocity to transport cuttings on low side
Excessive torque and drag
Strategies :
Circulate cuttings above the critical inclination range on connections
Minimize circulation stops, use top drive not kelly
Pump out on connections
Frequent short trips with backreaming
Low viscosity mud in turbulent flow in open hole annulus
Frequent low vis pills followed by high vis sweeps
Hole Cleaning
l Other considerations
When pumps shut down cuttings bed will slide in sections of holewith critical
deviation angle sticking pipe
have a back-up pump (or cementing truck) ready to go on-line in case of
main pump failure
intermittent reciprocation of drillstring with high flow rates well into
turbulence (backreaming the stand prior to connection)
watch returns when pumping sweeps to evaluate hole cleaning and keep
close watch on density and solids content of the mud
RT18
Turbulent flow is effective in high-angle, small diameter
intervals in competent formations
RT19
Hole cleaning capacity in laminar flow is improved by
elevated low shear-rate viscosity and gel strength.
RT25
Pipe rotation and reciprocation can improve hole cleaning
RT26
Mud weight increases the buoyant force on the cuttings
and helps hole cleaning.
RT9
Cuttings beds are easy to deposit, difficult to remove.
RT14
An increase in annular velocity improves hole cleaning,
regardless of the flow regime.
RT16
The cuttings transport mechanism is largely a function
of annular velocity.
RT17
Laminar flow is preferred if formations are sensitive to
erosion