You are on page 1of 98

AUDITING

A RISK-BASED APPROACH TO
CONDUCTING A QUALITY AUDIT
9th Edition
Karla M. Johnstone | Audrey A. Gramling | Larry E. Rittenberg

CHAPTER 5
PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS AND THE
AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1.

2.

3.

4.

Identify and compare the various auditing standards


that provide guidance on the audit opinion
formulation process
List and discuss the foundational principles
underlying the auditing standards
List the phases and related activities in the audit
opinion formulation process
Explain the concept of accounting cycles and
discuss their importance to the audit opinion
formulation process
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-2

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
5.

6.

7.

8.

Describe the assertions that are inherent to


financial statements and explain their importance
to the audit opinion formulation process
Define audit evidence and describe the purpose
and types of audit procedures used to obtain audit
evidence
Discuss the importance of audit documentation and
provide examples
Discuss audit activities in Phase I of the audit
opinion formulation process
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-3

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
9.

10.

11.

12.

Discuss audit activities in Phase II of the audit


opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase III of the audit
opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase IV of the audit
opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase V of the audit
opinion formulation process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-4

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
13.

14.

Apply the concepts related to the auditors


assessment of internal control design effectiveness,
implementation, and operating effectiveness
Apply the frameworks for professional decision
making and ethical decision making to issues
involving conducting an audit

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-5

THE AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION


PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-6

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT - IMPORTANCE


OF ADHERING TO PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS

Adhering to the professional auditing standards is


viewed as conducting a quality audit
Lack of adherence heightens the risk of issuing an
unqualified audit opinion on financial statements
that are materially misstated
Highlighted in the 2004-2006 audits of Thornton
Precision Components, Limited (TPC) performed by
Ernst & Young, LLP UK (E&Y UK)

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-7

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT - IMPORTANCE


OF ADHERING TO PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS

What is the role of auditing standards and their


underlying principles in promoting a quality audit?
(LO 1, 2)
How does the fundamental concept of professional
skepticism relate to audit quality? (LO 2)
What audit evidence is necessary for opining on a
clients financial statements? (LO 6)
How does audit documentation provide evidence
related to audit quality? (LO 7)
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-8

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT - IMPORTANCE


OF ADHERING TO PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS

What audit activities are conducted during the audit


opinion formulation process to provide reasonable
assurance about a clients financial statements? (LO
8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
How does professional judgment and ethical decision
making contribute to audit quality? (LO 14)

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-9

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1

IDENTIFY AND COMPARE THE VARIOUS


AUDITING STANDARDS THAT PROVIDE
GUIDANCE ON THE AUDIT OPINION
FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS


Auditors in the United States follow auditing
guidance issued by:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA)
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
(IAASB)

Common objective - Provide assurance to public that


audits are conducted in a quality manner
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-11

PROFESSIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS


Require auditors to develop and communicate:
Opinion on financial statements
Clients internal control over financial reporting

Vary according to the nature of organization audited


Audit compliance depends on:
Domicile of the organization
Where its stock is publicly traded

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-12

AICPAS AUDITING STANDARDS BOARD


- CLARITY PROJECT
Made standards easier to read, understand, and
apply
Converged its standards with the International
Standards on Auditing (ISAs), issued by the IAASB
Standards were written using drafting convention
called the clarity format
Issued the clarified standards in a single Statement
on Auditing Standard (SAS No. 122) in 2012

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-13

EACH STANDARD OF CLARITY FORMAT


PRESENTED IN FOLLOWING SECTIONS
Introduction
Purpose and scope of the standard

Objective
Context in which the requirements are set

Definitions
Relevant meanings of terms in standards

Requirements
Actions required to achieve objective of the standard

Application and other explanatory material


Cross-references to the requirements
Guidance for applying requirements of standard
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-14

AUDITING STANDARDS ISSUED BY THE


IAASB
Objectives
Set auditing, assurance, and other related standards
Facilitate convergence of international and national
auditing and assurance standards
Enhance quality and consistency of practice throughout
the world
Strengthen public confidence in the global auditing and
assurance profession

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-15

AUDITING STANDARDS ISSUED BY THE


IAASB
Standards should to be understandable, clear, and
consistent
Launched a program in 2004 to enhance clarity of its
ISAs
Clarity Project was completed in 2009
As of 2013, a set of its clarified standards comprises
of:
36 ISAs
1 International Standard on Quality Control (ISQC)
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-16

EACH STANDARD OF CLARITY FORMAT


PRESENTED IN FOLLOWING SECTIONS
Introduction
Purpose and scope of subject matter of ISA

Objective
Clear statement of the objective of the auditor

Definitions
For applicable terms included

Requirements
For each objective are provided

Application and other explanatory material


Explains what a requirement means or intends to cover
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-17

AUDITING STANDARDS ISSUED BY THE


PCAOB
Apply to auditors of U.S. public companies
Issued sixteen Auditing Standards (ASs) as of 2013
PCAOB interim standards - Standards adopted from
AICPA
Requirement for public company auditors, unless
superseded by a PCAOB standard
Standards issued by AICPA after April 16, 2003, not
included

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-18

EXHIBIT 5.1 - COMPARISON OF U.S. AND


INTERNATIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-19

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2

LIST AND DISCUSS THE FOUNDATIONAL


PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE AUDITING
STANDARDS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PCAOB GUIDANCE - GENERAL


STANDARDS
Require
Audit to be performed by individuals having adequate
technical training and proficiency as an auditor
Auditors to be independent:
In fact, i.e., in reality in terms of mental attitude and
In appearance, i.e., in how the auditor is perceived by
users

Audit to be conducted with professional care expected


of a prudent auditor

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-21

PCAOB GUIDANCE - FIELDWORK


STANDARDS
Applicable to conduct of the audit
Require auditors to:
Properly plan and supervise the audit
Develop an understanding of clients controls
Prerequisite for developing audit tests

Obtain audit evidence by performing audit procedures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-22

PCAOB GUIDANCE - REPORTING


STANDARDS
Applicable to communicating auditors opinion
Require auditors to:
State whether financial statements are presented in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework (i.e., GAAP or IFRS)
Identify conditions where accounting principles are not
consistently observed
Review disclosures for adequacy and state in the report if
disclosures are not reasonably adequate
Express an opinion on financial statements as a whole or
state that an opinion cannot be expressed
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-23

AICPA GUIDANCE - PURPOSE AND


PREMISE OF AUDIT
Purpose - Enhance degree of confidence that users
can place in financial statement
Premise - Management has responsibility to:
Prepare financial statements
Maintain internal control over financial reporting
Provide auditor with relevant information and access
to personnel

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-24

AICPA GUIDANCE - RESPONSIBILITIES


The auditors responsibilities include
Having appropriate competence and capabilities to
perform audit
Complying with ethical requirements
Maintaining professional skepticism throughout the
audit

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-25

AICPA GUIDANCE - PERFORMANCE


Obtain assurance that financial statements are free
from material misstatement
Limitations - Lack of absolute assurance about financial
statements being free from misstatement

Requires an auditor to:

Plan and supervise work


Determine materiality levels
Identify risks of material misstatement
Design and implement audit responses to assessed risks
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-26

AICPA GUIDANCE - REPORTING


Expressing either of the following
Financial statements are free of material misstatement
Stating that an opinion cannot be expressed

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-27

INTEGRATED AUDIT
Combines audits of an organizations financial
statements and its internal control over financial
reporting
In this audit:
Opinion provided on effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting
Additional audit work done to be able to issue that
opinion

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-28

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - BENEFITS OF


INTEGRATING THE AUDITS
Integrating audits of internal controls and of financial
statements makes sense
Both the tests of controls and direct tests of account
balances provide evidence related to each other
Example:
Tests of controls provide indirect evidence that financial
statements are free from misstatement
Further, if material misstatements found in account
balances or disclosures, it implies that there were
material weaknesses in internal controls
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-29

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3

LIST THE PHASES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN


THE AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

EXHIBIT 5.2 - OVERVIEW OF CLIENTS PREPARATION OF


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-31

EXHIBIT 5.3 - ACTIVITIES OF EACH PHASE OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-32

IMPORTANT CONCEPTS AFFECTING AUDIT


OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS
Accounting cycles
Management assertions
Audit evidence and audit procedures
Documentation

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-33

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4

EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTING


CYCLES AND DISCUSS THEIR IMPORTANCE TO
THE AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

ACCOUNTING CYCLES
Recording and processing transactions that affect a
group of related accounts
Begin when a transaction occurs and ends when it is
recorded in financial statements
Break the audit into manageable sections of related
accounts

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-35

ACCOUNTING CYCLES
Auditor focuses on:
Flow of transactions within a particular cycle
Identifying:
Points where material misstatement can occur
Controls that have been designed and implemented to
mitigate those risks

Understanding risks and controls within each cycle


Helps determine specific audit procedures to be used and
specific audit evidence to be obtained

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-36

EXHIBIT 5.4 - ILLUSTRATIONS OF CYCLES


AND RELATED ACCOUNTS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-37

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5

DESCRIBE THE ASSERTIONS THAT ARE INHERENT TO


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXPLAIN THEIR
IMPORTANCE TO THE AUDIT OPINION
FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

FINANCIAL STATEMENT ASSERTIONS


Assertions made by management

Existence
Completeness
Rights and obligations
Valuation
Presentation and disclosure

Related evidence is obtained for accounts and


disclosure in financial statements

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-39

MANAGEMENTS FINANCIAL STATEMENT


ASSERTIONS IN PCAOB STANDARDS
Existence or Occurrence
Refers to existence of assets and liabilities
Refers to occurrence of recorded transactions

Completeness
Refers to inclusion of all transactions and accounts in financial statements

Valuation or Allocation
Refers to inclusion of accounts in financial statements at appropriate
amounts

Rights and Obligations


Refers to assets being the rights of an organization
Refers to liabilities being the obligations of an organization

Presentation and Disclosure


Refers to components of financial statement being properly classified,
described, and disclosed
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-40

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6

DEFINE AUDIT EVIDENCE AND DESCRIBE THE


PURPOSE AND TYPES OF AUDIT PROCEDURES
USED TO OBTAIN AUDIT EVIDENCE

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

AUDIT EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURES


Audit evidence: Information used by auditor in
arriving at conclusions on which the opinion is based
Audit procedures: Procedures designed to obtain
audit evidence to support audit opinion(s)
Risk assessment procedures
Provide information for assessing the risks of material
misstatement in the financial statements
Do not provide sufficient evidence upon which to base an
audit opinion
Used for purposes of planning the audit
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-42

AUDIT EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURES


Tests of controls: Designed for evaluating operating
effectiveness of controls in preventing, or detecting
and correcting, material misstatements, typically at
assertion level
Substantive procedures
Designed for detecting material misstatements at
assertion level
Comprising of tests of details and substantive
analytical procedures
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-43

AUDIT PROCEDURES
Sufficient appropriate audit evidence: Measure of the
quantity of audit evidence about following factors of
audit procedures
Nature
Timing
Extent

Audit program
Lists audit procedures to be followed in gathering
evidence
Helps monitor progress and supervising work
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-44

EXHIBIT 5.6 - TYPES OF AUDIT


PROCEDURES

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-45

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 7

DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF AUDIT


DOCUMENTATION AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

AUDIT DOCUMENTATION
Record of audit procedures performed, relevant
audit evidence obtained, and conclusions the auditor
reached
Known as working papers or workpapers

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-47

PURPOSES OF AUDIT
DOCUMENTATION
Assisting engagement team in:
Planning and performing audit
Supervising and reviewing audit work

Retaining a record of matters of continuing


significance to future audits
Enabling internal or external inspections of
completed audits
Assisting auditors in understanding work performed
in prior year
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-48

EXAMPLES OF AUDIT
DOCUMENTATION
Audit programs
Analyses prepared by client or auditor
Memorandums
Summaries of significant findings or issues
Letters of confirmation and representation
Checklists
Correspondence concerning significant findings or
issues
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-49

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 8

DISCUSS AUDIT ACTIVITIES IN PHASE I OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PHASE I - MAKING CLIENT ACCEPTANCE


AND CONTINUANCE DECISIONS
Preconditions for accepting auditing engagements
Use of an acceptable financial reporting framework
Agreement of management to acknowledge and
understand its responsibilities

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-51

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - ACCEPTING A


NEW AUDIT ENGAGEMENT
Communicate with predecessor auditor
Following issues should be addressed
Information regarding integrity of management
Disagreements with management about accounting
policies, auditing procedures
Communications to management and those in charge
with governance regarding:
Fraud and noncompliance with laws
Deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-52

AUDIT ENGAGEMENT LETTER


Document specifying responsibilities of client and
auditor that includes the following:
Objective and scope of audit of financial statements
Responsibilities of auditor and management
Statement that some material misstatements may not be
detected due to inherent limitations of audit and internal
control
Identification of applicable financial reporting framework
for preparation of financial statements
Reference to expected form and content of any reports to
be issued
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-53

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 9

DISCUSS AUDIT ACTIVITIES IN PHASE II OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PHASE II - PERFORMING RISK


ASSESSMENT
Identifying relevant risks and determining audit
procedures required to address them
Continuing clients - Update information from
previous years audit
New clients - the risk assessment process is more
time consuming

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-55

IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING RISKS OF


MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
Essential to audit planning
Requires identification of significant:
Accounts
Disclosures
Relevant assertions

Auditor establishes a materiality level overall and for


specific accounts and disclosures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-56

EXHIBIT 5.7 - EXAMPLES OF SOURCES


OF RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-57

RISKS AT ASSERTION LEVEL


Inherent risk
The susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement, due to
error or fraud, that could be material, individually or in
combination with other misstatements, before
consideration of any related controls

Control risk
The risk that a misstatement due to error or fraud that
could occur in an assertion and that could be material,
individually or in combination with other misstatements,
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the
organization's internal control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-58

RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES


Inquiries for information to assist in identifying risks
of material misstatement due to fraud or error
Preliminary analytical procedures
Observation and inspection of documentation

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-59

TYPES OF CONTROLS
Entity-wide controls
Transaction controls
Fraud-related controls

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-60

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - CONTROLS TO


ADDRESS FRAUD RISK
PCAOB has identified the following
Controls over significant, unusual transactions, particularly
those resulting in unusual journal entries
Controls over journal entries and adjustments made in the
period-end financial reporting process
Controls over related-party transactions
Controls related to significant management estimates
Controls mitigating incentives for, and pressures on,
management to falsify financial results

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-61

TYPES OF PROCEDURES TO
ASSESS DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS
Inquiry of appropriate personnel
Observation of the organizations operations
Inspection of relevant documentation
Performance of walkthroughs
Documentation of preliminary assessment of control
design and basis for that assessment
Understand the approach used by management for
conclusions on effectiveness of internal control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-62

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - DOCUMENTING AUDITORS


UNDERSTANDING OF AN ORGANIZATIONS INTERNAL
CONTROLS

Process of documentation uses:


Narratives
Flowcharts
Questionnaires

Once documented, in subsequent years audit firms


focus on:
Changes in the system
Effectiveness of monitoring controls

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-63

ASSESSING RANGE OF CONTROL RISK


High control risk
Weak internal controls
Auditor cannot rely on controls to reduce substantive
procedures for account balances

Assessing control risk as low


Strong internal controls
Auditor will test operating effectiveness of controls to
reduce substantive procedures for account balances

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-64

AUDITING IN PRACTICE EXAMPLE FOR WEAK INTERNAL


CONTROL DESIGN AND LINKS TO SUBSTANTIVE AUDIT
PROCEDURES

Scenario - Clients internal control design assessed


as ineffective that makes a preliminary assessment of
control risk as high
Requires expanding substantive tests for sales
returns by:
Arranging to be on hand at year end to observe the
taking of physical inventory
Determining if receipts for items returned by
customers are issued in the correct time period
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-65

AUDITING IN PRACTICE EXAMPLE FOR WEAK INTERNAL


CONTROL DESIGN AND LINKS TO SUBSTANTIVE AUDIT
PROCEDURES

Reviewing credit memos issued shortly after year end


Increasing number of accounts receivable
confirmations sent to the clients customers

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-66

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN


INTEGRATED AUDIT
Risk assessment procedures apply to:
Audit of internal control over financial reporting
Audit of financial statements

Top-down approach - Used for audit of internal control


over financial reporting to select controls to test
Begins at financial statement level
Focuses on entity-wide controls
Works down to significant accounts and disclosures and
their relevant assertions
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-67

RESPONDING TO IDENTIFIED RISKS OF


MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
Purpose of risk assessment procedures
Identify risks of material misstatement
Determine where misstatements in financial
statements may occur
Design appropriate audit strategy

Controls reliance audit: Includes tests of controls


and substantive procedures
Substantive audit: Includes substantive procedures
and does not include tests of controls
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-68

RESPONDING TO IDENTIFIED RISKS OF


MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
Selecting specific audit procedures to respond to
identified risks
Assembling an audit team having knowledge, skill,
and ability needed to address assessed risks
Emphasizing the need for professional skepticism
Providing an appropriate level of supervision for
assessed risks
Incorporating elements of unpredictability in
selection of audit procedures
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-69

EXHIBIT 5.8 - RESPONDING TO IDENTIFIED RISKS


THROUGH EVIDENCE DECISIONS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-70

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN


INTEGRATED AUDIT
Audit strategy that includes tests of controls to
accomplish objectives of both audits
Sufficient evidence related to operating effectiveness
of controls to support auditors:
Control risk assessments for purposes of the audit of
financial statements
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting as
of year-end

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-71

FRAUD CONSIDERATIONS
Performing tests of controls and substantive
procedures susceptible to fraud risks
Performing procedures related to risk of
management override of controls
Examining journal entries
Reviewing accounting estimates for biases
Evaluating business rationale for significant unusual
transactions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-72

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 10

DISCUSS AUDIT ACTIVITIES IN PHASE III OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PHASE III - OBTAINING EVIDENCE ABOUT


INTERNAL CONTROL OPERATING EFFECTIVENESS
Auditor tests controls
Determine whether controls are operating effectively
at year-end or throughout the year

Auditor obtains more persuasive audit evidence


As the reliance auditor places on effectiveness of a
control increases

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-74

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES


AND TESTS OF OPERATING EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS

Auditors risk assessment procedures include


Inquiring about managements use of budgets
Inspecting documentation of managements
comparison of monthly budgeted and actual expenses
Inspecting reports pertaining to the investigation of
variances between budgeted and actual amounts

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-75

SELECTING CONTROLS TO TEST


Involves choosing controls that effectively indicate
capability to address the assessed risk of material
misstatement for relevant assertions
Auditor selects:
Entity-wide controls
Reduce number of control activities selected for testing

Transaction controls

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-76

EXHIBIT 5.9 - LINKING FINANCIAL STATEMENT


ASSERTIONS AND SELECTING CONTROLS TO TEST

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-77

TYPES OF CONTROLS AND EXAMPLES OF


CONCEPTS AFFECTING CONTROL TESTING
Computerized Controls

Determining changes to important


computer applications during the
year

If there are changes,


testing integrity of
controls after
changes

Considering
submitting test
transactions through
the system to
determine its
performance

Taking a random
sample of
transactions for
determining:
a) Operations of key
controls
b) Completion of
process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

Reviewing
exception reports
and determining:
a) Proper exceptions
being noted
b) Exceptions go to
authorized
personnel with
adequate follow-up

5-78

TYPES OF CONTROLS AND EXAMPLES OF


CONCEPTS AFFECTING CONTROL TESTING
Manual Controls
Documented evidence for control
to be working; taking sample of
transactions to determine control
operation evidence

Taking a sample of
transactions and
examining
evidence
supporting that the
controls are
working

Authorizations

Taking a sample of
reconciliations to
determine that:
a) They were
performed by an
authorized person
b) They were
performed properly

Reconciliations

Reviewing
documentation of
selected
transactions to
determine:
a) Proper
authorization
b) Recorded in
correct time period

Taking a sample of
reports used to
identify unusual
transactions and
review them to
determine:
a) Regular usage
b) Identification of
unusual items

Reviews for unusual transactions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-79

TYPES OF CONTROLS AND EXAMPLES OF


CONCEPTS AFFECTING CONTROL TESTING
Controls over Adjusting
Entries
Documented evidence for
controls over normal journal
entries and their regular
application
Taking a sample of adjusting entries and
reviewing to determine:
a) Supporting documentation
b) Appropriate entry
c) Entry made in correct accounts

Giving special attention to significant entries


made near year end

d) Proper authorization of entry

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-80

TYPES OF CONTROLS AND EXAMPLES OF


CONCEPTS AFFECTING CONTROL TESTING
Controls over Accounting
Estimates

Documented evidence for


controls over estimates ensuring
accuracy of data, consistency in
performance, regularly updating
the model

All entries being properly


authorized

Ensuring estimates are


updated for current
economic conditions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

Finding evidence that data


used for estimation come
from reliable sources

5-81

FIRST APPROACH TO TESTING


CONTROLS
Take sample of customer orders and trace it through
the system to determine whether:
There was proper review of credit and
Credit authorization or denial was proper

Advantage - Most effective because it helps in


determining that the control worked effectively
Requires documentation of all credit applications and
purchase orders required
Based on audit sampling
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-82

SECOND APPROACH TO TESTING


CONTROLS
Taking a sample of recorded items and tracing back
to credit approval process
Provides evidence on proper credit approval for all
items presently recorded
Does not provide evidence as to whether other items
should have been approved for credit, but had not
been approved

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-83

THIRD APPROACH TO TESTING


CONTROLS
Uses a computer audit program and develops a printout of account balances exceeding their credit
authorization
Cost-effective
Requires an inference about the control
Covers only the operation of the controls related to
the current account balances
100% evaluation of each item currently recorded

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-84

TESTING THE OPERATING


EFFECTIVENESS
Auditor tests relevant principles of components of:

Control environment
Risk assessment
Information and communication
Monitoring

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-85

RESULTS OF TESTS OF CONTROLS FOR


FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT
If control deficiencies are identified
Assess them to determine whether preliminary control
risk assessment should be modified
Record the implications for substantive procedures

If no control deficiencies are identified


Assess whether preliminary control risk assessment is still
appropriate
Determine extent that controls can provide evidence on
accuracy of account balances
Determine planned substantive audit procedures
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-86

RESULTS OF TESTS OF CONTROLS FOR


FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT
Determine how much assurance about reliability of
account balances can be obtained from the effective
operation of controls
Within any audit, level of assurance will vary across:
Accounts
Disclosures
Assertions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-87

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 11

DISCUSS AUDIT ACTIVITIES IN PHASE IV OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PHASE IV - OBTAINING SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT


ACCOUNTS, DISCLOSURES, AND ASSERTIONS
Substantive procedures include:
Substantive analytical procedures
Tests of details of account balances

Considerations in determining appropriate


substantive procedures:
Source of potential misstatement
Extent and type of potential misstatement

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-89

EXHIBIT 5.12 - FACTORS AFFECTING


SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURES TO BE PERFORMED

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-90

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 12

DISCUSS AUDIT ACTIVITIES IN PHASE V OF THE


AUDIT OPINION FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

PHASE V - COMPLETING THE AUDIT


AND MAKING REPORTING DECISIONS
Completing various review and communication
activities
Making a decision about what types of opinions
should be issued
Deciding on the appropriate opinion to be issued
It can be based on financial statements and internal
control
It can be issued in one report or in two separate
reports
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-92

LEARNING OBJECTIVE 13
APPLY THE CONCEPTS RELATED TO THE AUDITORS
ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL DESIGN
EFFECTIVENESS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND OPERATING
EFFECTIVENESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF
CONTROLS
Factors considered in deciding whether to categorize
a deficiency as significant or not
Risk that is being mitigated and whether other controls
operate effectively
Materiality of related account balances
Nature of deficiency
Volume of transactions affected
Subjectivity of account balance that is subject to
control
Rate at which control fails to operate
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-94

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF
CONTROLS
Deficiency of segregation of duties
Did not rise to a significant deficiency or a material
weakness
Management decides to use this deficiency as a
motivation to centralize purchases

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-95

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF
CONTROLS
Deficiency of lack of approval considered as a
significant deficiency based on the following
rationale:
Major departure from an approved process
Could lead to purchase of unauthorized goods
Could be shipped elsewhere and lead to material
misstatement in financial statements

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-96

AUDITOR ASSESSMENT OF CONTROLS


Auditor reviews:
Managements documentation of its internal control
Managements evaluation and findings related to
internal control effectiveness

Auditor then gathers evidence on operating


effectiveness of these controls
By taking a random sample auditor needs to
independently determine that the controls are working
or not
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-97

AUDITOR ASSESSMENT OF CONTROLS


Implications for substantive procedures in financial
statement audit:
Auditor will do limited testing of inventory quantities
at year end
Auditor will assess year-end inventory for potential
obsolescence
Auditor will continue to examine all adjusting entries at
the end of the year

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage Learning

5-98

You might also like