Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H I G H L I G H T S
G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 20 January 2014
Received in revised form 24 March 2014
Accepted 25 March 2014
Available online 26 March 2014
Hybrid electronic tongue was developed for the monitoring of citric acid production by Aspergillus niger.
The system based on various potentiometric/voltammetric sensors and appropriate chemometric
techniques provided correct qualitative and quantitative classication of the samples collected during
standard Aspergillus niger culture and culture infected with yeast. The performance of the proposed
approach was compared with the monitoring of the fermentation process carried out using classical
methods. The results obtained proved, that the designed hybrid electronic tongue was able to evaluate
the progress and correctness of the fermentation process.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Citric acid production
Fermentation process
Aspergillus niger
Process monitoring
Electrochemical sensors
Hybrid electronic tongue
1. Introduction
Citric acid (2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid) is involved in the metabolic process of energy conversion such as the
citric acid cycle (Krebs cycle, tricarboxylic acid cycle) [1,2]. Due to
its acidic and antioxidant properties, the citric acid is widely
applied as an acidity regulator, preservative and avoring agent in
food industry [3] but also in chemical industry, pharmacy,
26
27
Table 1
Components used for preparation of potentiometric sensors.
Electrode type Ionophore
+
Na
CH3COO
H+
Cationselective
Anionselective
Lipophilic salt
Plasticizer
Conditioning solution
0.15 wt%
KTFPB
0.15 wt%
KTFPB
1.75 wt%
KTFPB
1.00 wt%
KTFPB
3.50 wt%
TDMAC
65 wt% DOS
0.01 M NaCl
66 wt% oNPOE
64 wt% DOS
66 wt% DOS
64 wt % oNPOE
production (after this phase, one of the culture was infected with
yeast),
Phase II stabilization of citric acid production during the
standard process or interruption of the fermentation process in
the case of the infected culture,
Phase III termination of the citric acid production in the
standard culture.
A classical breeding monitoring, involving the measurement of
the pH changes and the determination of the total acidity of the
sample solutions collected from both fermentation cultures, was
carried out. Successive production and accumulation of citric acid
resulted in the gradual decrease of pH (Fig. 1) and, after the rst
phase, almost linear growth of the total acidity of the samples
(Fig. 2) during the standard process. Moreover, according to our
expectations, the measured values of pH and total acidity were
similar for both cultures before the yeast infection. The introduction of the bakers yeast into the culture (4 days after starting the
culture), caused an abrupt increase of acid concentration in the
samples, whereas the pH was stabilized at a level of 2.5 (higher
than for standard culture). The results suggested that another
organic acid was produced after the culture infection, inuencing
the total acidity of the medium. However, a weaker acid than the
citric acid was probably produced since the pH remained
unchanged after the infection (pH was maintained by the citric
acid formed during the I phase).
28
[(Fig._1)TD$IG]
[(Fig._3)TD$IG]
phase I
phase II
phase III
-5
8.0x10
3.5
-5
3.0
infection
pH
infected culture
2.5
Current [A]
6.0x10
phase III
-5
4.0x10
phase II
-5
2.0
standard culture
2.0x10
phase I
0.0
0.1
1.5
0
100
200
300
400
Fig. 1. pH measurements of the samples collected during the standard and infected
fermentation process.
[(Fig._2)TD$IG]
phase I
phase II
phase III
infected culture
cHA [mol/L]
0.3
0.2
standard culture
infection
0.1
0.0
100
200
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
Potential [V]
Fig. 3. Exemplary cyclic voltammograms (forward scans) registered in the samples
collected during the standard fermentation process.
Time [h]
0.4
0.3
300
400
Time [h]
Fig. 2. Determination of the total acidity of the samples collected during the
standard and infected fermentation process.
[(Fig._4)TD$IG]
29
[(Fig._6)TD$IG]
10
8
6
LV 2 (9.1%)
PC 2 (18.3%)
4
2
0
-2
-6
-15
-10
-5
10
15
20
4
2
0
-2
phase I
phase II
phase III
-4
-4
-6
-20
25
-15
PC 1 (67.3%)
-10
-5
10
15
LV 1 (74.7%)
Fig. 4. PCA plot of chemical images of the samples collected during standard fungal
culture (data obtained for Hybrid-ET).
Fig. 6. PLS-DA plot of chemical images of the samples collected during the standard
and infected fermentation process (data obtained for Hybrid-ET).
[(Fig._7)TD$IG]
0.30
[(Fig._5)TD$IG]
0.25
PC 2 (9.5%)
4
2
0
0.20
0.15
train
2
y=0.98x+0.04, R =0.978
test
2
y=0.94x+0.07, R =0.980
0.10
-2
phase I
phase II
phase III
-4
-6
-15
-10
-5
10
0.05
0.05
15
Fig. 5. PCA plot of chemical images of the samples collected during infected fungal
culture (data obtained for Hybrid-ET).
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
30
Table 2
Parameters of linear tting of real and PLS-predicted total acidity and process duration for standard culture.
Total acidity
Process duration
Pot-ET
a
b
R2
Volt-ET
Hybrid-ET
Pot-ET
Volt-ET
Hybrid-ET
Train
Test
Train
Test
Train
Test
Train
Test
Train
Test
Train
Test
0.97
0.05
0.967
0.91
0.12
0.970
0.87
0.20
0.875
0.61
0.68
0.770
0.98
0.04
0.978
0.94
0.07
0.980
0.98
4.90
0.976
0.92
14.2
0.975
0.88
24.7
0.880
0.99
1.35
0.993
0.99
12.7
0.996
0.92
16.2
0.921
Table 3
Parameters of linear tting of real and PLS-predicted total acidity and process duration for infected culture.
Total acidity
Process duration
Pot-ET
a
b
R2
Volt-ET
Hybrid-ET
Train
Test
Train
Train
Test
0.99
0.02
0.991
1.01
0.00
0.993
0.89
0.27
0.886
0.83
0.66
0.765
0.99
0.02
0.993
Pot-ET
Train
1.02
0.02
0.992
Volt-ET
Hybrid-ET
Test
Train
Test
Test
Train
Test
0.99
1.35
0.993
0.99
12.7
0.996
0.92
16.2
0.921
0.94
20.8
0.718
1.00
0.61
0.997
1.02
2.39
0.996
31