Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[edit] Wind
See also: Wind power, List of onshore wind farms, and List of offshore wind farms
[edit] Hydroelectric
The Gordon Dam in Tasmania is a large conventional dammed-hydro facility, with an installed
capacity of up to 430 MW.
Main article: Hydroelectricity
In hydro energy, the gravitational descent of a river is compressed from a long run to a single
location with a dam or a flume. This creates a location where concentrated pressure and flow can
be used to turn turbines or water wheels, which drive a mechanical mill or an electric generator.
[23]
In some cases with hydroelectric dams, there are unexpected results. One study shows that a
hydroelectric dam in the Amazon has 3.6 times larger greenhouse effect per kWh than electricity
production from oil, due to large scale emission of methane from decaying organic material[24],
though this is most significant as river valleys are initially flooded, and are of much less
consequence for more boreal dams.[25] This effect applies in particular to dams created by simply
flooding a large area, without first clearing it of vegetation. There are however investigations
into underwater turbines that do not require a dam. And pumped-storage hydroelectricity can use
water reservoirs at different altitudes to store wind and solar power.
[edit] Solar
Nellis Solar Power Plant, the third largest photovoltaic power plant in North America.
Main articles: Solar energy and Photovoltaics
Solar power involves using solar cells to convert sunlight into electricity, using sunlight hitting
solar thermal panels to convert sunlight to heat water or air, using sunlight hitting a parabolic
mirror to heat water (producing steam), or using sunlight entering windows for passive solar
heating of a building. It would be advantageous to place solar panels in the regions of highest
solar radiation.[26] In the Phoenix, Arizona area, for example, the average annual solar radiation is
5.7 kWh/(mday),[27] or 2.1 MWh/(myr). Electricity demand in the continental U.S. is
3.71012 kWh per year. Thus, at 20% efficiency, an area of approximately 3500 square miles
(3% of Arizona's land area) would need to be covered with solar panels to replace all current
electricity production in the US with solar power. The average solar radiation in the United
States is 4.8 kWh/(mday),[28] but reaches 89 kWh/m/day in parts of the Southwest.
At the end of 2009, cumulative global photovoltaic (PV) installations surpassed 21 GW[6][7][8] and
PV power stations are popular in Germany and Spain.[9] Solar thermal power stations operate in
the USA and Spain, and the largest of these is the 354 megawatt (MW) SEGS power plant in the
Mojave Desert.[10]
China is increasing worldwide silicon wafer capacity for photovoltaics to 2,000 metric tons by
July 2008, and over 6,000 metric tons by the end of 2010.[29] Significant international investment
capital is flowing into China to support this opportunity. China is building large subsidized offthe-grid solar-powered cities in Huangbaiyu and Dongtan Eco City. Much of the design was done
by Americans such as William McDonough.[30]
[edit] Geothermal
Main article: Geothermal power
Geothermal energy harnesses the heat energy present underneath the Earth. Two wells are drilled.
One well injects water into the ground to provide water. The hot rocks heat the water to produce
steam. The steam that shoots back up the other hole(s) is purified and is used to drive turbines,
which power electric generators. When the water temperature is below the boiling point of water
a binary system is used. A low boiling point liquid is used to drive a turbine and generator in a
closed system similar to a refrigeration unit running in reverse. There are also natural sources of
geothermal energy: some can come from volcanoes, geysers, hot springs, and steam vents.[31] The
world's largest geothermal power installation is The Geysers in California, with a rated capacity
of 750 MW.
[edit] Tidal
Main article: Tidal power
Tidal power can be extracted from Moon-gravity-powered tides by locating a water turbine in a
tidal current, or by building impoundment pond dams that admit-or-release water through a
turbine. The turbine can turn an electrical generator, or a gas compressor, that can then store
energy until needed. Coastal tides are a source of clean, free, renewable, and sustainable energy.
[32]
The Moss Landing Power Plant burns natural gas to produce electricity in California.
Main articles: Fossil fuel and Peak oil
Fossil fuels sources burn coal or hydrocarbon fuels, which are the remains of the decomposition
of plants and animals. There are three main types of fossil fuels: coal, petroleum, and natural gas.
Another fossil fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), is principally derived from the production of
natural gas. Heat from burning fossil fuel is used either directly for space heating and process
heating, or converted to mechanical energy for vehicles, industrial processes, or electrical power
generation.
Greenhouse gas emissions result from fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Currently
governments subsidize fossil fuels by an estimated $500 billion a year.[33]
[edit] Nuclear
Main articles: Nuclear power and Peak uranium
[edit] Fission
power generation have both been the cause of more deaths per energy unit produced than nuclear
power generation.[38][39]
Nuclear proliferation is the spread of nuclear technology which may happen from nation to
nation or through other black market channels, including nuclear power plants and related
technology including nuclear weapons.
The long-term radioactive waste storage problems of nuclear power have not been solved.
Several countries have considered using underground repositories. Nuclear waste takes up little
space compared to wastes from the chemical industry which remain toxic indefinitely.[40] Spent
fuel rods are now stored in concrete casks close to the nuclear reactors.[41] The amounts of waste
could be reduced in several ways. Both nuclear reprocessing and breeder reactors could reduce
the amounts of waste. Subcritical reactors or fusion reactors could greatly reduce the time the
waste has to be stored.[42] Subcritical reactors may also be able to do the same to already existing
waste. The only long-term way of dealing with waste today is by geological storage.
At present, nuclear energy is in decline, according to a 2007 World Nuclear Industry Status
Report presented by the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament. The report outlines that
the proportion of nuclear energy in power production has decreased in 21 out of 31 countries,
with five fewer functioning nuclear reactors than five years ago. There are currently 32 nuclear
power plants under construction or in the pipeline, 20 fewer than at the end of the 1990s.[43][44]
Thorium can be used as fuel in a nuclear reactor. A thorium fuel cycle offers several potential
advantages over a uranium fuel cycle including much greater abundance on Earth, superior
physical and nuclear properties of the fuel, enhanced proliferation resistance, and reduced
nuclear waste production. Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia at CERN (European Organization for
Nuclear Research), has worked on developing the use of thorium as an alternative to uranium in
reactors. Rubbia states that a tonne of thorium can produce as much energy as 200 tonnes of
uranium, or 3,500,000 tonnes of coal.[45] One of the early pioneers of the technology was U.S.
physicist Alvin Weinberg at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, who helped develop a
working nuclear plant using liquid fuel in the 1960s.
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this
article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and
removed. (April 2008)
[edit] Fusion
Fusion power could solve many of the problems of fission power (the technology mentioned
above) but, despite research having started in the 1950s, no commercial fusion reactor is
expected before 2050.[46] Many technical problems remain unsolved. Proposed fusion reactors
commonly use deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen, as fuel and in most current designs also
lithium. Assuming a fusion energy output equal to the current global output and that this does not
increase in the future, then the known current lithium reserves would last 3000 years, lithium
from sea water would last 60 million years, and a more complicated fusion process using only
deuterium from sea water would have fuel for 150 billion years.[47]
Electricity distribution may change in the future. New small scale energy sources may be placed
closer to the consumers so that less energy is lost during electricity distribution. New technology
like superconductivity or improved power factor correction may also decrease the energy lost.
Distributed generation permits electricity "consumers," who are generating electricity for their
own needs, to send their surplus electrical power back into the power grid.
[edit] Transmission
[edit] Water
Further information: Water cycle and Pumped-storage hydroelectricity
This section requires expansion.
function correctly. Ethanol's corrosive properties make it harder to build ethanol pipelines. The
higher costs of ethanol transportation and storage are often prohibitive.[51]
[edit] Electricity
[edit] Storage
[edit] Chemical
Some natural forms of energy are found in stable chemical compounds such as fossil fuels. Most
systems of chemical energy storage result from biological activity, which store energy in
chemical bonds. Man-made forms of chemical energy storage include hydrogen fuel, synthetic
hydrocarbon fuel, batteries and explosives such as cordite and dynamite.
[edit] Thermal
There are several technologies to store heat. Thermal energy from the sun, for example, can be
stored in a reservoir or in the ground for daily or seasonal use. Thermal energy for cooling can be
stored in ice.[53] Many thermal power plants are set up near coal or oil fields. The thermal power
plant is used since fuel is burnt to produce heat energy, which is converted into electrical energy .
[53]
[edit] Hydrogen
Main article: Hydrogen economy
Hydrogen can be manufactured at roughly 77 percent thermal efficiency by the method of steam
reforming of natural gas.[55] When manufactured by this method it is a derivative fuel like
gasoline; when produced by electrolysis of water, it is a form of chemical energy storage as are
storage batteries, though hydrogen is the more versatile storage mode since there are two options
for its conversion to useful work: (1) a fuel cell can convert the chemicals hydrogen and oxygen
into water, and in the process, produce electricity, or (2) hydrogen can be burned (less efficiently
than in a fuel cell) in an internal combustion engine.
[edit] Vehicles
[edit] Sustainability
See also: Climate change mitigation and Carbon pricing
[edit] Resilience
Energy consumption per capita (2001). Red hues indicate increase, green hues decrease of
consumption during the 1990s.
Some observers contend that the much talked about idea of energy independence is an
unrealistic and opaque concept. They offer energy resilience as a more sensible goal and more
aligned with economic, security and energy realities. The notion of resilience in energy was
detailed in the 1982 book Brittle Power: Energy Strategy for National Security.[56] The authors
argued that simply switching to domestic energy would be no more secure inherently because the
true weakness is the interdependent and vulnerable energy infrastructure of the United States.
Key aspects such as gas lines and the electrical power grid are centralized and easily susceptible
to major disruption. They conclude that a resilient energy supply is necessary for both national
security and the environment. They recommend a focus on energy efficiency and renewable
energy that is more decentralized.[57]
More recently former Intel Corporation Chairman and CEO Andrew Grove has touted energy
resilience, arguing that complete independence is infeasible given the global market for energy.
[58]
He describes energy resilience as the ability to adjust to interruptions in the supply of energy.
To this end he suggests the U.S. make greater use of electricity.[59] Electricity can be produced
from a variety of sources. A diverse energy supply will be less impacted by the disruption in
supply of any one source. He reasons that another feature of electrification is that electricity is
sticky meaning the electricity produced in the U.S. is more likely to stay there because it
cannot be transported overseas. According to Grove, a key aspect of advancing electrification
and energy resilience will be converting the U.S. automotive fleet from gasoline-powered to
electric-powered. This, in turn, will require the modernization and expansion of the electrical
power grid. As organizations such as the Reform Institute have pointed out, advancements
associated with the developing smart grid would facilitate the ability of the grid to absorb
vehicles en masse connecting to it to charge their batteries.[60]
[edit] Future
Energy production usually requires an energy investment. Drilling for oil or building a wind
power plant requires energy. The fossil fuel resources (see above) that are left are often
increasingly difficult to extract and convert. They may thus require increasingly higher energy
investments. If the investment is greater than the energy produced, then the fossil resource is no
longer an energy source. This means that a large part of the fossil fuel resources and especially
the non-conventional ones cannot be used for energy production today. Such resources may still
be exploited economically in order to produce raw materials for plastics, fertilizers or even
transportation fuel but now more energy is consumed than produced. (They then become similar
to ordinary mining reserves, economically recoverable but not net positive energy sources.) New
technology may ameliorate this problem if it can lower the energy investment required to extract
and convert the resources, although ultimately basic physics sets limits that cannot be exceeded.
Between 1950 and 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the globe,
world grain production increased by 250%. The energy for the Green Revolution was provided
by fossil fuels in the form of fertilizers (natural gas), pesticides (oil), and hydrocarbon fueled
irrigation.[62] The peaking of world hydrocarbon production (peak oil) may lead to significant
changes, and require sustainable methods of production.[63]