Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Key words:
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to systematically
investigate
some
Micro particles.
properties
of
of
the
important
Aceclofenac
physicochemical
loaded
micro
permits
unrestricted
use,
distribution,
and
Article History:------------------------
flow
properties,
excipient
compatibility,
entrapment
Introduction
*Corresponding author, Mailing address:
B. Jayanthi,
M. Pharm, Assistant professor, Dept. of Pharmacy,
Faculty of Engineering & Technology,
Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar,
Tamilnadu, India 608 002
E-mail: maureeyaa2005@gmail.com
Osteoarthritis,
rheumatoid
arthritis
and
186
symptoms
Ankylosing
of
spondylitis
Rheumatoid
is
Arthritis,
characterized
by
man
research.
[6].
pKa,
dissolution,
melting
point
and
assay
is
anti-
such
from
potent
as
analgesic,
rheumatoid
spondylities
[3].
anti-pyretic
arthritis
and
and
ankylosing
Evonik
Dichloromethane
Degussa
(DCM)
Industries,
AR,
Mumbai,
Acetone
AR,
clinical activity.
Micro
the
specific sites
187
particles
[4].They
are
one
of
(I)
analytical grade
[13]
I=
Experimental Studies
acetone,
x100
Angle of repose
Determination of solubility
solubility
methanol,
diethyl
ether
method
pH Determination
[14]
the funnel until the apex of the cone thus formed just
Systronics,
India)[8,9].
triplicate determinations.
Tan = h/r
True density
True density of aceclofenac was determined
determinations.
D=
phases [15].
Partition Coefficient =
compressibility index
The
bulk
density
of
aceclofenac
[11, 12].
was
10g of
The
drug
loaded
microspheres
were
188
% of moisture loss =
Solubility
pH
True density
(gm/cc)
Bulk density
(gm/cc)
Compressibility
Index (%)
Angle of repose ( o )
Moisture content
(%)
Partition Coefficient
Results
Aceclofenac
Sodium
Hydrate
occurs as white crystalline powder.
It is very soluble in acetone and
chloroform
7.1 0.2 7
[19].
1.62 0.42
0.6084 0.57
14.15 0.35
30.16 1.15
8.52 0.45
1.87 0.53
Aceclofenac
Concentration
(g/ml)
5
10
15
20
25
Absorbance
x
SD%
0.153
0.298
0.429
0.592
0.743
0.25
0.16
0.08
0.15
0.21
Standard
solution
of
aceclofenac
was
Pharmaspec1700,
UV-Vis
Material
Ethyl cellulose
Eudragit RSPO
Aerosil
SDS
Tween 80
Amount of
Amount
Percent
Aceclofenac Estimated Estimated
Added (mg)
(mg)
(Recovery)
100
100
100
100
100
99.91
99.95
99.58
99.94
99.98
189
six
individually
weighed
sample
of
99.91
99.95
99.58
99.94
99.98
quality of tablets.
Brand
No
Tablet
Brand
Uniformity of
weight (mg)
Friability
(%)
Hardness of
tablets
(kg/cm2)
AcecloSR
358.8
0.060
8.4 0.652
AceclanSR
389.4
0.065
10.8 0.803
Zerodol
CR
298.7
0.126
7.2 0.962
Drug
release in
24 hrs
77.4
68.39
78.44
desiccators.
Table 5: Composition of Aceclofenac ethyl cellulose
(EC) [F1, F2], Aceclofenac EudragitRSPO (EU) [F3,
F4] micro particles using aerosol as dispersing Agent
Formulations
Ingredients
F1
F2
F3
F4
Drug
100
100
100
100
Polymer
[ECF1F2, EU F3 F4]
200
400
100
300
10:5
12:8
10:5
12:8
micro
2%
2%
2%
2%
150ml
150ml
150ml
150ml
Percentage yield
Emulsion-solvent-evaporation technique
21]
particles
containing.
Aceclofenac
three
[23].
The
Percentage yield =
(2%,4%
acetone
w/v
EC
dissolved
in
DCM-
particles
were
observed
in
Electron
in
aqueous
phase
(purified
water
190
particles
were
determined
by
laser
[24],
which was
percent
entrapment
was
calculated
using
the
100
Entrapment Efficiency
Mean Particles
Size (m)
Drug Release
(in 12hrs)
AECAM 1
82
76
444
91
AECAM 2
86
79
636
94
AEUAM3
78
73
196
84
AEUAM4
80
77
319
88
Formulation Code
Sr.No:0826533
Lab
India].
Micro
particles,
100rpm,
using
auto
sampling
US
dissolution
MB1
6.9 0.65
7.80.21
10.50.05
22.60.20
28.90.03
36.60.09
41.20.11
48.60.05
53.50.05
59.60.02
64.280.04
68.90.21
77.40.22
3.3
MB2
7.20.04
8.80.23
11.60.22
14.540.05
17.30.12
20.40.08
26.70.21
33.30.16
37.60.06
440.07
48.50.08
55.30.12
68.390.16
4.6
MB3
5.80.32
7.30.12
10.10.43
15.820.62
20.690.59
27.820.33
30.30.62
46.40.06
53.70.01
60.210.08
64.50.34
69.50.29
78.440.27
4.2
F1
0
5.34-0.06
11.370.04
26.60.12
39.90.41
46.40.52
52.50.08
61.10.02
68.20.04
77.30.11
84.50.21
91.70.17
5.3
F2
0
3.560.07
15.310.12
30.70.62
36.10.21
520.06
57.30.21
64.70.63
73.60.17
82.20.42
86.40.21
94..30.74
5.6
F3
0
4.260.06
9.870.15
21.340.04
33.20.18
41.50.06
51.30.04
55.60.18
61.40.04
68.40.07
79.70.11
84.80.64
4.9
191
F4
0
5.210.16
12.420.34
26.030.05
31.60.08
39.40.21
53.10.34
59.60.16
66.80.62
74.20.52
83.70.19
88.30.15
5.5
Figure 2: In vitro dissolution of Aceclofenac commercial brand and aceclofenac loaded microparticles.
A
B
Figure 4: SEM photographs of Aceclofenac ethyl cellulose (EC) micro particles using aerosil [A] (AECAM),
Aceclofenac Eudragit RSPO (EU) micro particles using aerosil [B] (AEUAM)
a) AECAM1
192
(b) AECAM2
C) AEUAM3
D) AEUAM4
Figure 5.Particle size (m) volume (%) distributions curve of Aceclofenac Ethyl cellulose aerosil and Aceclofenac
Eudragit RSPO aerosil micro particles. (a) AECAM1, (b) AECAM2,(C)AEUAM3, (D) AEUAM4 .Measured in a
Malvern particle sizer
193
Aceclofenac
Stability studies
The micro particles was taken in a crucible
successfully
loaded
prepared
micro
by
particles
emulsion
were
solvent
[27].
Sl.
No.
Time in
days
Physical
Changes
Percentage drug
content(mg)
F1
F2
F3
F4
--
76.07
79.34
73.08
77.23
15
No change
76.04
79.30
73.06
77.21
30
No change
76.07
79.28
73.07
77.19
45
No change
76.08
79.31
73.03
77.18
60
No change
76.05
79.29
73.04
77.16
as
flow
properties,
packing
densities,
Aceclofenac
Ethyl
cellulose
and
[28].
194
5)
CONCLUSION
Male
Subjects.
Tropical
Journal
of
Nayanabhirama
U,
Sureshwar
P.
Multiparticulate
compounds.
Therefore,
it
is
imperative
that
7)
drug
delivery
system
of
of
investigations.
the
personnel
In
this
study
conducting
was
the
888-889.
8)
successfully
9)
Shinichi
Yoshikawa,
Ryo
Murata,
Shigenari
Shida,Koji
References
pain.
Expert
Opinion
on
4th
Indian
444.
12)
14)
comparative
study
between
liposomes
and
Evaluation
and
Method
Preparation
of
lamivudine
acetazolamide,
International
Journal
of
195
Ed.,
4)
Pharmacy,
3)
Suzuki,Shunji
2)
Tsuneyoshi
1)
Uwai,
selection
for
the
microspheres.
The
16)
Sridhar.S.K,
Bhaskar
Saravanan.M.
K,
Dhanaraju.D,
Srinivasarao.G.
Preparation,
polystyrene
microspheres,
Backett,
A.H.,
and
Stenlake,
J.B.,
Practical
275 325.
18(2): 223-236.
to
design,
development
and
using
Aerosil
as
dispersing
carrier,
Preparation
of
sustained-release
196