Bloom

Bloom

1986

144

SPSS

Bloom

Bloom

(2003

2005

Bloom

Bloom

Bloom

Bloom

Bloom

2369512

75

Bloom

Bloom

BloomEnglhartFurstHill

Krathwohl1956

Bloom

Bloom

Bloom2001

Anderson & Krathwohl,2001

1 Bloom
Anderson et al,2001,p.268

76

2369512

1.

3Procedural Knowledge

A.

2.

B.

4 M e t a c o g n i t i v e

verb-noun relationship
3.
cumulative
hierarchy
increasing complexity hierarchy

C.
Knowledge

A.B.
C.
self knowledge

4.
Bloom

2.Cognitive Process Dimension

1.Knowledge Dimension
Bloom

92
retention

Bloom

transfer

1Remember

A.B.

Bloom

2Understand

1Factual Knowledge

A.B.C.

D.E.F.G.

A.B.

2Conceptual Knowledge

3Apply

A.B.

4Analyze

A.B.

C.

A.B.C.

2369512

77

Airasian2002

5Evaluatecriteria

standards

A.B.
6Create

A.B.C.

Airasian,20022003
20042005

1986

2003Anderson

2005

Krathwohl2001

Bloom

91

2004Bloom

1.

2.

2005

3.4.

Bloom

5.

Bloom

78

Bloom

2000

2369512

144

21
140

1.

2.94
Bloom

2

3.
4.

SPSS 10.0

1.
Cronbach 0.7228

2.
Bloom

3.

27

0.44
0.990.70.95
130.25
80.4

21121
SPSS
1.16.54
2.PR 27=Pp 15PR 73=Pp 19
3.

Bloom
1.
1
A.

90
B.1356.1

C.1880.5

2369512

79

34

A.

B.

806

4 8 . 8

C.

2 0

30.2

1572.1

1783.7

1.

A-2-1-1-1

C.

1A-2-1-1-1Bloom

1783.7

181921

92.4

2.
1

79.9

A.

B.
90.2

92.7
2
A.

1314

80

B.
50

2369512

2.

D-2-5-1-1

D-2-2-3-1

53.5

D-2-3-2-2

4 E - 2 - 7 - 4 - 2

5 6 . 1

1D-2-2-3-1

3 8 . 2

23

3.

E-2-1-7-2

E-2-5-9-3

E-2-3-2-3
E-2-3-2-1

4.

F-2-3-4-2

F-2-2-1-1

F-2-8-2-1

F-2-6-7-1

F-2-5-1-1

E-2-3-2-2

2F-2-2-1-1

E-2-7-4-2

3F-2-3-4-2

90

5 8 . 1

1E-2-1-7-2 E-2-5-9-3

58.1

E-2-3-2-1

2E-2-3-2-3

95.1

4F - 2 - 8 - 2 - 1 F - 2 - 5 - 1 - 1

34.9

F-2-6-7-190
50

3E-2-3-2-2

90.2

2369512

81

5F-2-2-1-118

52.8

Bloom

1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

3.

2004Bloom12298-127
200023167-71
2003
2005Bloom
2005

2003105
94-106
2002
2005641-12

82

2369512

1986

Airasian, P.W., Miranda, H. (2002). The role of assessment in the revised taxonomy. Theory into Practice,
41(4), 249-254.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Rath,
J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom
s taxonomy of educational objectives. NewYork:Longman.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (1956). Taxonomy of
educational objectivesThe classification of educational goals. (Handbook:cognitive domain).
New York: David Mckay.
Krathwohl, D. R.(2002). A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4),
212-218.

2369512

83

84

E-2-1-7-2
2
1.1

E-2-5-9-3

1 a

1
2
3
4

D-2-5-1-1

1 b

E-2-3-2-3
1
1.1

3
4

2369512

2
47

A-2-1-1-1

2.6

1
2
3
4

D-2-2-3-1
2.6

1
E-2-1-7-2

2.4

1
2
3
4

E-2-5-9-3

2 a

2369512

85

10

11

86

E-2-3-2-1

2.4

1
2
3
4

E-2-3-2-2
2
2 b

1
2
3
4

2369512

F-2-3-4-2

2 a

12

13

14

F-2-2-1-1

2 a

E-2-7-4-2

2.6

F-2-8-2-1

2 b

2369512

87

15

16

17

88

117
2

D-2-3-2-2

3.2

A-2-1-1-1

3.1

A.

B.
C.
D.

1CABD
2BDCA
3CDAB
4BACD

D-2-2-3-1
3.1

2369512

18

19

20

21

1
2
3
4

F-2-2-1-1

3.1

F-2-3-4-2

3.1

F-2-6-7-1

4.1

1
2
3
4

F-2-5-1-1

5.1

2369512

89

2 Bloom

Knowledge
Dimension
A.
Factual
Knowledge

B.
Conceptual
Knowledge

Cognitive Process Dimension

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

E-2-1-7-2
E-2-5-9-3

A-2-1-1-1
D-2-2-3-1
E-2-1-7-2
E-2-3-2-1
E-2-5-9-3

D-2-5-1-1
E-2-3-2-3

E-2-3-2-2
E-2-7-4-2
F-2-2-1-1
F-2-3-4-2
F-2-8-2-1

D.
Metacognitive
Knowledge

D-2-3-2-2

A-2-1-1-1
D-2-2-3-1
F-2-2-1-1
F-2-3-4-2
F-2-4-3-1
F-2-6-10-2
F-2-6-7-1
F-2-8-2-1

C.
Procedural
Knowledge

90

F-2-6-7-1

2369512

F-2-5-1-1