Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Failing Schools
2015 Report
Report was prepared by the Policy Office, Education Team and the Division of Budget.
8%
16%
53%
New York State Department of Education, Information and Reporting Services. See
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/statistics/public/.
$15,981
$17,173
$18,618
$18,126
$19,076
19,552
$10,000
$5,000
$0
State support has financed much of New Yorks spending growth. For example,
school district expenditures more than doubled between 1997-98 and 2012-13,
growing from $27.6 billion to $58.3 billion. 4 Over the same 15-year period, district
revenues increased by $31.2 billion.
CPI
The distribution of this increase almost exactly mirrors that of school districts'
total revenues in 2012-13; even in the face of significant economic and policy
challenges the State has maintained its commitment to funding education.
Although comprehensive financial data is not yet available for the 2013-14 and
2014-15 school years, it is expected that these years will ultimately show
education spending has grown to surpass $60 billion statewide. The State's last
two Enacted Budgets contained School Aid increases totaling approximately $2.1
billion, bringing School Aid to its highest annual level in history at $22.2 billion in
2014-15. In addition, these two years saw independent school districts present
voters with budgets seeking the levy of $1.0 billion of additional property taxes.
New York States School Aid funding is progressive. For example, under the
2014-15 Enacted Budget, New York State provides nearly three times as much aid
per pupil to high-need school districts ($9,639) as to low-need districts ($3,371).
Excluding New York City, which has significantly more income and property wealth
than most high-need districts, the State provides $12,634 of aid per pupil to highneed districts. Because of this progressive formula, in 2012-13 State aid provided
the 20 percent of school districts with the lowest fiscal capacity with almost 70
percent of their total revenues on average, compared to less than 17 percent for
the 20 percent of districts with the greatest fiscal capacity.
New York State Department of Education, Information and Reporting Services. See
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/ela-math/2014/2014Grades3-8ELAMath-final8-13-14.pdf
6
National Center for Education Statistics.
7
For the 2012-13 school year, SED reported a graduation rate of 74.9 percent.
8
New York State Department of Education. See:
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/pressRelease/20141218/2010-CohortGradRate-12-17-14.pdf
9
http://system.suny.edu/media/suny/content-assets/documents/institutionalresearch/2014_03_BOTAA_Remediation.pdf
In the 2013-2014 school year, the teacher evaluation system resulted in the
following ratings:
It is incongruous that 99% of teachers were rated effective 10, while only 35.8
percent of our students are proficient in math and 31.4 percent in English
language arts. How can so many of our teachers be succeeding when so many
of our students are struggling?
10
2012-2013 Percent of
Teachers
51.2%
43.3%
4.5%
1%
100.0%
2013-14 Percent of
Teachers
41.9%
53.7%
3.7%
0.7%
100.0%
Data from New York State Education Department. Data as of December 2014.
SED has not yet released district-level teacher evaluation details for the 2013-14
school year except for New York City. The statewide 2013-2014 rating
breakdowns are expected to be even less distributed than they were in the 20122013 school year.
Part Five: Failing Schools
Today there are 178 priority or failing schools in 17 school districts in New
York. These schools have been in a monitored or accountability status
pursuant to SED regulations for the last three school years and have been
among the bottom five percent in the state in ELA and math performance or have
graduation rates below 60 percent. 12 There are currently 109,000 students
enrolled in these failing schools.
Of the 178 schools, 77 have been failing for a decade. More than 250,000
students 13 have passed through these 77 schools in the past ten years. That
represents 250,000 students who did not have access to the high quality public
education that they deserved.
Moreover, we are failing the kids who need us most. Ninety-three percent of
students in failing schools are students of color and 82 percent of these students
are eligible for free or reduced price lunch.
Student achievement today at failing schools lags behind state averages in
every category.
11
http://www.regents.nysed.gov/meetings/2014/December2014/Evaluation.pdf
This summary reflects the data that were reported to the Department by districts, BOCES, and charter
schools with approved 2013-14 APPR plans as of the 10/17/2014 deadline. 186,877 teachers were reported
with 3 complete subcomponents and an overall composite rating. New York City did not have a system in
place for the 2012-13 school year, but is included in 2013-14.
12
13
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/2012-13AccountabilityDesignations.html
Division of Budget estimates based on historic enrollment data from SED.
Failing Schools
5.9%
6.2%
46.6%
Statewide
31.4%
35.8%
76.4%
Despite the fact that districts with failing schools receive more State funding than
other districts, these schools are delivering unacceptable results. For example,
the 2014-15 Enacted Budget provides the 17 school districts containing these
failing schools with $9,000 of School Aid per pupil on average, or 11 percent
more than the statewide average of $8,114. The 16 school districts outside New
York City, meanwhile, receive $12,933 of School Aid per pupil on average, or 59
percent more than the statewide average.
These statistics and more are summarized in the school snapshots contained
in the Appendix to this report. 14
Part Six: Conclusion
The statistics and facts contained in this report and its Appendix expose a public
education system badly in need of change. Our levels of achievement must
increase if we want to ensure bright futures for all New Yorkers.
This is why Governor Cuomo has proposed an ambitious education reform
agenda in his 2015-2016 Executive Budget that addresses key areas including
teacher preparation, certification, evaluation and tenure and the transformation of
our failing schools. Our students deserve nothing less.
14
This Appendix contains snapshots for 177 of the 178 failing schools in the state. The Greenburgh Eleven
Middle School, identified by the State Education Department as a Priority School, is not included in this
Appendix since it is a part of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District (a Special Act School
District) and comparable data is not available in all categories. Special Act School districts were created by
special action of the legislature for the purpose of providing education services to students who reside in
child care institutions.
10
11
Number of Consecutive Years Failing: Number of Years a school has been identified
by New York State Education Department to be in a standing other than "In Good
Standing" since 2005-6.
Source: New York State Education Department, Accountability Data.
Need Resource Category: A measure of a district's ability to meet the needs of its
students with local resources. Is the ratio of the estimated poverty percentage
(expressed in standard score form) to the Combined Wealth Ratio (expressed in
standard score form). A district with both estimated poverty and Combined Wealth Ratio
equal to the State average would have a need/resource capacity index of 1.0.
Need/Resource Capacity (N/RC) categories are determined from this index using the
definitions provided by the New York State Education Department in the table located
here: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/201112/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf
Percent of Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students: The three-year average
computed as: (a) the number of K-6 public school pupils in the district who were eligible
applicants for Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program as of October 2010, 2011 and
2012 divided by (b) the full day K-6 enrollment of pupils on a regular day school register
as reported in the Fall 2010, 2011 and 2012 Basic Education Data System (BEDS).
Source: New York New York State Education Department, February 2014.
Percent of Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students for a School: Percent of students
identified as receiving free or reduced lunch in the 2012-13 school year.
Source: New York State Education Department "2012-13 Report Card Database."
http://data.nysed.gov/downloads.php.
Percent Minority Students: The Percent of the enrollment in a school identified as any
ethnicity other than "white" in the school report card dataset.
Source: New York State Education Department "2012-13 Report Card Database."
http://data.nysed.gov/downloads.php.
Percent of Students English Language Learners: Computed as (a) the number of
pupils served in the base year in programs for pupils with limited English proficiency in
accordance with regulations adopted for such purpose (used in the calculation of
Foundation Aid) divided by (b) the estimated Fall 2013 public school enrollment for State
Aid which includes equivalent attendance, students with disabilities attending BOCES full
time, homebound students educated at a district expense and charter school enrollment
(excluding students with disabilities attending private and State operated schools.
Source: New York State Education Department, February 2014.
12
Priority School: School identified as being in Priority Status. Priority Schools are
among the lowest five percent in the State in terms of combined English language arts
and mathematics performance that are not making progress, as well as those schools
that have graduation rates below 60% for the last several years. Schools that were
previously identified as Persistently Lowest Achieving and received School
Improvement Grants in the 2011-12 school year were also identified as Priority Schools.
Source: New York State Education Department, "Accountability designation 2012-13,
2012-13 Web Posting Overview." http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/201213AccountabilityDesignations.html.
Teacher Effectiveness 2012-13: The percentage of teachers identified at each level in
the Annual Professional Performance Review for the 2012-13 school year (not including
suppressed data.)
Source: New York New York State Education Department, Educator Data "Annual
Professional Performance Review Ratings." http://data.nysed.gov/.
Teacher Effectiveness 2013-14: The percentage of teachers identified at each level in
the Annual Professional Performance Review for the 2013-14 school year for New York
City (not including suppressed data).
Source: New York New York State Education Department, "2014 Statewide Evaluation
Results--Preliminary Results", pg. 9, December, 2014.
http://www.regents.nysed.gov/meetings/2014/December2014/Evaluation.pdf.
Total School Enrollment 2005-06 through 2011-12: New York State Education
Department, "2005-06 Report Card Database" "2006-07 Report Card Database"
"2007-08 Report Card Database" "2008-09 Report Card Database" "2009-10 Report
Card Database"
"2010-11 Report Card Database" "2011-12 Report Card Database"
Enrollment may be labeled as N/A if the school was not operating in a particular school
year, or if the data is unavailable.
http://data.nysed.gov/downloads.php
Total School Enrollment 2012-13: New York State Education Department, "NY
STATE Public School Enrollment (2012 - 13)."
http://data.nysed.gov/enrollment.php?year=2013&state=yes
Total School Enrollment 2013-14: New York State Education Department, "NY STATE
Public School Enrollment (2013 - 14)."
http://data.nysed.gov/enrollment.php?year=2014&state=yes
13
Patricia Fahy
Neil Breslin
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.2%
2005-06
2,824
50.6%
% Minority Students
77.6%
2006-07
2,756
2007-08
2,840
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,668
2009-10
2,598
2010-11
2,507
2011-12
2,236
School
N/A
N/A
51.9%
2012-13
2,214
2013-14
2,262
$78,815,455
$88,456,588
+ $9,641,133
+ 12.2%
10,640
$8,314
$19,891
$10,608
+ 87.5%
High Need
Urban Suburban
69.7%
6.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
15
16
15
12%
88%
0%
0%
John McDonald
Neil Breslin
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.2%
2005-06
298
94.9%
% Minority Students
93.9%
2006-07
261
2007-08
241
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
292
2009-10
286
2010-11
323
2011-12
320
School
5.7%
2.4%
N/A
2012-13
295
2013-14
297
$78,815,455
$88,456,588
+ $9,641,133
+ 12.2%
10,640
$8,314
$19,891
$10,608
+ 87.5%
High Need
Urban Suburban
69.7%
6.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
16
16
15
12%
88%
0%
0%
John McDonald
Neil Breslin
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.2%
2005-06
638
72.0%
% Minority Students
80.7%
2006-07
495
2007-08
430
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
470
2009-10
629
2010-11
576
2011-12
589
School
6.2%
16.2%
N/A
2012-13
603
2013-14
686
$78,815,455
$88,456,588
+ $9,641,133
+ 12.2%
10,640
$8,314
$19,891
$10,608
+ 87.5%
High Need
Urban Suburban
69.7%
6.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
17
16
15
12%
88%
0%
0%
Angelo Santabarbara
George A. Amedore, Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 27.8%
2005-06
360
66.0%
% Minority Students
44.6%
2006-07
466
2007-08
449
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
421
2009-10
454
2010-11
472
2011-12
446
School
11.2%
11.0%
N/A
2012-13
453
2013-14
475
$31,468,399
$40,209,930
+ $8,741,531
+ 27.8%
3,706
$10,850
$14,993
$10,608
+ 41.3%
59.2%
3.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
19
16
15
0%
100%
0%
0%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
950
86.4%
% Minority Students
95.3%
2006-07
914
2007-08
921
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
952
2009-10
1,066
2010-11
848
2011-12
729
School
N/A
N/A
36.9%
2012-13
661
2013-14
592
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
21
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Bilingual Center
Michael Kerns
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
444
85.2%
% Minority Students
79.2%
2006-07
435
2007-08
465
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
473
2009-10
488
2010-11
479
2011-12
460
School
8.6%
8.1%
N/A
2012-13
447
2013-14
452
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
22
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
675
92.8%
% Minority Students
90.5%
2006-07
672
2007-08
654
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
570
2009-10
510
2010-11
535
2011-12
516
School
3.8%
3.9%
N/A
2012-13
526
2013-14
538
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
23
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Build Academy
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
615
91.7%
% Minority Students
97.8%
2006-07
645
2007-08
582
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
594
2009-10
570
2010-11
574
2011-12
505
School
1.3%
2.9%
N/A
2012-13
459
2013-14
433
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
24
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
486
81.1%
% Minority Students
93.9%
2006-07
518
2007-08
523
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
551
2009-10
655
2010-11
602
2011-12
590
School
N/A
N/A
38.6%
2012-13
523
2013-14
540
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
25
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
718
86.2%
% Minority Students
97.4%
2006-07
775
2007-08
765
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
722
2009-10
756
2010-11
790
2011-12
736
School
2.3%
7.1%
N/A
2012-13
703
2013-14
675
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
26
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
777
90.1%
% Minority Students
98.7%
2006-07
794
2007-08
811
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
813
2009-10
770
2010-11
676
2011-12
679
School
2.0%
2.3%
N/A
2012-13
618
2013-14
583
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
27
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
573
84.3%
% Minority Students
93.5%
2006-07
626
2007-08
644
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
621
2009-10
622
2010-11
614
2011-12
620
School
5.8%
6.5%
N/A
2012-13
642
2013-14
658
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
28
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 10.2%
2005-06
663
78.9%
% Minority Students
97.7%
2006-07
701
2007-08
680
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
714
2009-10
721
2010-11
610
2011-12
524
School
N/A
N/A
38.9%
2012-13
388
2013-14
390
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
29
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 10.2%
2005-06
N/A
85.3%
% Minority Students
94.9%
2006-07
730
2007-08
696
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
665
2009-10
680
2010-11
658
2011-12
685
School
8.4%
6.5%
N/A
2012-13
728
2013-14
729
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
30
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
710
93.8%
% Minority Students
94.9%
2006-07
614
2007-08
542
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
503
2009-10
489
2010-11
455
2011-12
480
School
1.1%
1.2%
N/A
2012-13
450
2013-14
403
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
31
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 10.2%
2005-06
510
94.3%
% Minority Students
95.0%
2006-07
400
2007-08
331
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
190
2009-10
261
2010-11
299
2011-12
364
School
3.2%
2.9%
N/A
2012-13
396
2013-14
428
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
32
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
494
80.6%
% Minority Students
95.4%
2006-07
410
2007-08
426
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
380
2009-10
556
2010-11
574
2011-12
607
School
4.0%
2.7%
N/A
2012-13
646
2013-14
664
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
33
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Highgate Heights
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
600
86.2%
% Minority Students
97.4%
2006-07
610
2007-08
615
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
596
2009-10
530
2010-11
533
2011-12
508
School
2.8%
4.7%
N/A
2012-13
494
2013-14
441
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
34
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
N/A
87.3%
% Minority Students
92.9%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
127
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
265
2009-10
436
2010-11
431
2011-12
495
School
6.5%
4.0%
43.6%
2012-13
521
2013-14
523
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
35
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
984
76.5%
% Minority Students
94.0%
2006-07
834
2007-08
752
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
773
2009-10
870
2010-11
678
2011-12
738
School
4.5%
4.4%
15.5%
2012-13
780
2013-14
691
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
36
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Marc Panepinto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
1,152
76.9%
% Minority Students
85.7%
2006-07
1,124
2007-08
1,123
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,185
2009-10
1,150
2010-11
1,098
2011-12
1,080
School
N/A
N/A
64.7%
2012-13
985
2013-14
967
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
37
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
PS 17
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Marc Panepinto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
505
89.6%
% Minority Students
92.6%
2006-07
495
2007-08
481
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
466
2009-10
434
2010-11
366
2011-12
338
School
10.9%
8.0%
N/A
2012-13
351
2013-14
366
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
38
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
PS 37 Futures Academy
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
629
96.5%
% Minority Students
95.9%
2006-07
623
2007-08
569
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
540
2009-10
532
2010-11
528
2011-12
491
School
0.0%
0.6%
N/A
2012-13
503
2013-14
467
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
39
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
910
92.1%
% Minority Students
93.0%
2006-07
892
2007-08
901
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
582
2009-10
475
2010-11
470
2011-12
484
School
4.3%
3.1%
N/A
2012-13
471
2013-14
712
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
40
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Marc Panepinto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
370
76.6%
% Minority Students
89.6%
2006-07
370
2007-08
384
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
381
2009-10
392
2010-11
423
2011-12
386
School
3.1%
3.4%
N/A
2012-13
353
2013-14
330
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
41
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
348
82.2%
% Minority Students
96.9%
2006-07
391
2007-08
381
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
369
2009-10
434
2010-11
486
2011-12
490
School
5.0%
4.9%
N/A
2012-13
489
2013-14
487
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
42
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Robin Schimminger
Marc Panepinto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
1,210
82.0%
% Minority Students
87.7%
2006-07
1,220
2007-08
1,070
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
732
2009-10
794
2010-11
762
2011-12
760
School
N/A
N/A
16.4%
2012-13
751
2013-14
768
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
43
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Michael Kearns
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
1,032
68.9%
% Minority Students
48.4%
2006-07
1,016
2007-08
859
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
777
2009-10
700
2010-11
817
2011-12
773
School
N/A
N/A
55.2%
2012-13
824
2013-14
882
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
44
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 10.2%
2005-06
704
92.6%
% Minority Students
94.9%
2006-07
724
2007-08
693
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
695
2009-10
722
2010-11
749
2011-12
690
School
12.6%
11.5%
N/A
2012-13
690
2013-14
626
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
45
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Waterfront School
Sean Ryan
Timothy Kennedy
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
771
89.8%
% Minority Students
87.8%
2006-07
827
2007-08
815
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
830
2009-10
839
2010-11
881
2011-12
839
School
9.8%
6.2%
N/A
2012-13
837
2013-14
830
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
46
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Sean Ryan
Marc Panepinto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 10.2%
2005-06
505
94.8%
% Minority Students
86.2%
2006-07
519
2007-08
459
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
397
2009-10
446
2010-11
506
2011-12
592
School
6.8%
5.8%
N/A
2012-13
688
2013-14
764
$612,363,776
$675,091,882
+ $62,728,106
+ 10.2%
41,749
$16,170
$18,971
$10,608
+ 78.8%
84.1%
10.8%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
47
16
15
59%
32%
5%
4%
Phil Ramos
Thomas D. Croci
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 20.1%
2005-06
1,003
80.5%
% Minority Students
95.6%
2006-07
960
2007-08
912
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
845
2009-10
862
2010-11
905
2011-12
909
School
11.7%
12.0%
N/A
2012-13
934
2013-14
735
$75,918,200
$91,172,990
+ $15,254,790
+ 20.1%
6,993
$13,038
$23,909
$10,608
+ 125.4%
High Need
Urban Suburban
84.7%
25.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
49
16
15
73%
27%
0%
0%
Assembly District # 18
Senate District # 6
Earlene Hooper
Kemp Hannon
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 16.9%
2005-06
1,322
47.5%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
1,327
2007-08
1,207
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,178
2009-10
1,152
2010-11
1,202
2011-12
1,239
School
4.7%
7.3%
N/A
2012-13
1,313
2013-14
1,394
$87,708,540
$102,528,136
+ $14,819,596
+ 16.9%
7,942
$12,910
$25,551
$10,608
+ 140.9%
High Need
Urban Suburban
86.4%
22.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
51
16
15
4%
58%
32%
6%
Earlene Hooper
Kemp Hannon
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 16.9%
2005-06
1,679
34.1%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
1,791
2007-08
1,578
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,669
2009-10
1,635
2010-11
1,666
2011-12
932
School
N/A
N/A
42.6%
2012-13
570
2013-14
1,894
$87,708,540
$102,528,136
+ $14,819,596
+ 16.9%
7,942
$12,910
$25,551
$10,608
+ 140.9%
High Need
Urban Suburban
86.4%
22.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
52
16
15
4%
58%
32%
6%
J. Gary Pretlow
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 16.8%
2005-06
862
68.6%
% Minority Students
94.2%
2006-07
860
2007-08
784
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
877
2009-10
825
2010-11
792
2011-12
819
School
5.6%
10.2%
N/A
2012-13
799
2013-14
723
$67,420,484
$78,739,768
+ $11,319,284
+ 16.8%
8,778
$8,970
$22,708
$10,608
+ 114.1%
High Need
Urban Suburban
67.2%
9.1%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
54
16
15
12%
36%
33%
19%
James Skoufis
William J. Larkin Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.2%
2005-06
1,177
87.0%
% Minority Students
86.3%
2006-07
1,130
2007-08
1,043
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,043
2009-10
1,076
2010-11
1,050
2011-12
1,056
School
17.5%
13.7%
N/A
2012-13
1,001
2013-14
961
$117,356,088
$132,850,541
+ $15,494,453
+ 13.2%
11,278
$11,780
$19,891
$10,608
+ 87.5%
High Need
Urban Suburban
70.8%
13.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
56
16
15
36%
56%
5%
3%
Sheldon Silver
Daniel L. Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 13.4%
2005-06
294
74.2%
% Minority Students
98.3%
2006-07
434
2007-08
518
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
472
2009-10
511
2010-11
450
2011-12
423
School
3.8%
3.3%
39.3%
2012-13
389
2013-14
314
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
58
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Sheldon Silver
Daniel L. Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
558
87.9%
% Minority Students
98.4%
2006-07
619
2007-08
526
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
441
2009-10
352
2010-11
370
2011-12
365
School
N/A
N/A
44.1%
2012-13
359
2013-14
399
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
59
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 74
Senate District # 26
Brian Kavanagh
Daniel L. Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
266
0.0%
% Minority Students
98.3%
2006-07
228
2007-08
243
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
235
2009-10
192
2010-11
190
2011-12
176
School
9.7%
3.2%
N/A
2012-13
170
2013-14
161
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
60
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 65
Senate District # 26
Sheldon Silver
Daniel L. Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
161
93.0%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
256
2007-08
279
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
252
2009-10
178
2010-11
116
2011-12
115
School
15.8%
18.7%
N/A
2012-13
118
2013-14
99
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
61
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 75
Senate District # 27
Richard Gottfried
Brad Hoylman
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,955
85.4%
% Minority Students
97.7%
2006-07
1,843
2007-08
1,855
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,790
2009-10
1,835
2010-11
1,707
2011-12
1,428
School
N/A
N/A
50.7%
2012-13
1,194
2013-14
715
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
62
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Brian Kavanagh
Liz Krueger
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
2,817
100.0%
% Minority Students
96.8%
2006-07
2,606
2007-08
2,432
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,678
2009-10
1,484
2010-11
1,239
2011-12
1,039
School
N/A
N/A
39.5%
2012-13
586
2013-14
308
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
63
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
389
77.8%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
450
2007-08
497
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
464
2009-10
442
2010-11
417
2011-12
406
School
6.0%
11.7%
67.8%
2012-13
396
2013-14
426
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
64
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 68
Senate District # 29
Robert Rodriguez
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
87.8%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
86
2009-10
152
2010-11
197
2011-12
179
School
18.0%
6.6%
N/A
2012-13
156
2013-14
150
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
65
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Robert Rodriguez
Bill Perkins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
360
73.4%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
444
2007-08
348
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
300
2009-10
309
2010-11
267
2011-12
234
School
4.4%
4.4%
N/A
2012-13
198
2013-14
105
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
66
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 70
Senate District # 30
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
488
85.3%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
527
2007-08
552
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
529
2009-10
516
2010-11
521
2011-12
517
School
N/A
N/A
22.6%
2012-13
442
2013-14
271
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
67
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
654
68.6%
% Minority Students
98.5%
2006-07
554
2007-08
538
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
501
2009-10
571
2010-11
662
2011-12
622
School
4.4%
8.1%
N/A
2012-13
640
2013-14
538
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
68
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 71
Senate District # 31
Herman Farrell
Adriano Espaillat
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
80.8%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
155
2007-08
268
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
343
2009-10
432
2010-11
458
2011-12
520
School
8.1%
11.7%
58.2%
2012-13
539
2013-14
596
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
69
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 84
Senate District # 29
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,285
91.4%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
1,258
2007-08
1,203
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,180
2009-10
1,100
2010-11
955
2011-12
719
School
N/A
N/A
47.4%
2012-13
499
2013-14
393
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
70
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 84
Senate District # 29
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
420
94.4%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
470
2007-08
482
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
491
2009-10
459
2010-11
394
2011-12
311
School
N/A
N/A
40.8%
2012-13
239
2013-14
178
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
71
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 84
Senate District # 32
Carmen Arroyo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,168
76.1%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
1,040
2007-08
961
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
897
2009-10
835
2010-11
731
2011-12
570
School
6.3%
4.4%
N/A
2012-13
435
2013-14
390
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
72
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
MS 203
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
562
95.3%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
528
2007-08
431
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
359
2009-10
296
2010-11
291
2011-12
279
School
0.0%
1.1%
N/A
2012-13
294
2013-14
173
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
73
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
MS 224
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
496
94.5%
% Minority Students
98.7%
2006-07
400
2007-08
344
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
356
2009-10
347
2010-11
382
2011-12
373
School
6.1%
4.3%
N/A
2012-13
348
2013-14
330
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
74
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Michael Blake
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 13.4%
2005-06
336
95.1%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
326
2007-08
335
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
321
2009-10
313
2010-11
345
2011-12
385
School
N/A
N/A
50.7%
2012-13
431
2013-14
461
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
75
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Performance School
Michael Blake
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
92.2%
% Minority Students
98.9%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
557
2009-10
574
2010-11
572
2011-12
567
School
10.2%
6.0%
N/A
2012-13
539
2013-14
231
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
76
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 84
Senate District # 29
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
6
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,533
91.2%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
1,537
2007-08
1,504
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,302
2009-10
1,101
2010-11
831
2011-12
659
School
N/A
N/A
30.8%
2012-13
402
2013-14
236
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
77
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 84
Senate District # 29
Carmen Arroyo
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
98.1%
% Minority Students
96.9%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
263
2009-10
257
2010-11
260
2011-12
262
School
9.4%
3.7%
N/A
2012-13
282
2013-14
280
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
78
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Marcos Crespo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 13.4%
2005-06
291
78.5%
% Minority Students
99.3%
2006-07
354
2007-08
409
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
465
2009-10
468
2010-11
451
2011-12
437
School
N/A
N/A
34.9%
2012-13
423
2013-14
347
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
79
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 82
Senate District # 34
Michael Benedetto
Jeffrey Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
5.4%
% Minority Students
91.2%
2006-07
4,286
2007-08
4,322
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
4,095
2009-10
4,122
2010-11
3,945
2011-12
3,599
School
N/A
N/A
47.6%
2012-13
2,813
2013-14
2,057
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
80
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 79
Senate District # 32
Michael Blake
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,753
90.5%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
1,808
2007-08
1,720
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,488
2009-10
1,279
2010-11
1,010
2011-12
715
School
N/A
N/A
37.7%
2012-13
484
2013-14
293
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
81
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Michael Blake
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
489
85.8%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
431
2007-08
359
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
373
2009-10
326
2010-11
338
2011-12
325
School
1.6%
4.7%
N/A
2012-13
278
2013-14
224
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
82
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
PS 107
Marcos Crespo
Jeffrey Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
611
83.4%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
564
2007-08
525
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
529
2009-10
534
2010-11
493
2011-12
505
School
10.6%
12.3%
N/A
2012-13
471
2013-14
477
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
83
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 85
Senate District # 34
Marcos Crespo
Jeffrey Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
93.8%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
125
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
328
2009-10
438
2010-11
428
2011-12
323
School
2.0%
6.0%
N/A
2012-13
308
2013-14
278
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
84
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Carmen Arroyo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
93.6%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
390
2009-10
399
2010-11
406
2011-12
387
School
3.6%
3.5%
N/A
2012-13
411
2013-14
356
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
85
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 77
Senate District # 33
Latoya Joyner
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
482
81.2%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
487
2007-08
521
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
468
2009-10
445
2010-11
439
2011-12
398
School
N/A
N/A
37.7%
2012-13
372
2013-14
352
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
86
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 77
Senate District # 33
Latoya Joyner
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
6
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
83.0%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
114
2007-08
216
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
301
2009-10
366
2010-11
348
2011-12
348
School
N/A
N/A
40.2%
2012-13
311
2013-14
346
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
87
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Victor Pichardo
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,097
90.4%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
1,080
2007-08
922
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
884
2009-10
802
2010-11
772
2011-12
710
School
5.4%
5.0%
N/A
2012-13
666
2013-14
635
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
88
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Michael Blake
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
632
95.5%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
524
2007-08
462
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
456
2009-10
473
2010-11
443
2011-12
442
School
2.8%
4.3%
N/A
2012-13
403
2013-14
370
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
89
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 79
Senate District # 33
Michael Blake
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
471
84.2%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
452
2007-08
429
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
408
2009-10
434
2010-11
448
2011-12
452
School
5.5%
4.0%
N/A
2012-13
426
2013-14
380
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
90
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
IS 339
Michael Blake
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
953
97.3%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
914
2007-08
895
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
841
2009-10
805
2010-11
799
2011-12
740
School
6.1%
6.1%
N/A
2012-13
656
2013-14
601
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
91
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Latoya Joyner
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
720
89.9%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
701
2007-08
670
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
638
2009-10
679
2010-11
644
2011-12
653
School
1.4%
6.5%
N/A
2012-13
664
2013-14
577
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
92
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 77
Senate District # 33
Latoya Joyner
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
411
82.9%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
471
2007-08
490
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
457
2009-10
445
2010-11
415
2011-12
377
School
N/A
N/A
18.4%
2012-13
362
2013-14
248
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
93
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 77
Senate District # 32
Latoya Joyner
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 13.4%
2005-06
379
86.1%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
305
2007-08
261
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
277
2009-10
255
2010-11
209
2011-12
199
School
4.4%
4.6%
N/A
2012-13
191
2013-14
188
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
94
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 77
Senate District # 29
Latoya Joyner
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 13.4%
2005-06
508
100.0%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
496
2007-08
506
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
463
2009-10
410
2010-11
470
2011-12
426
School
12.5%
13.5%
N/A
2012-13
449
2013-14
197
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
95
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
PS 64 Pura Belpre
Latoya Joyner
Jose Serrano
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
962
98.0%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
931
2007-08
909
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
866
2009-10
861
2010-11
828
2011-12
885
School
5.4%
3.4%
N/A
2012-13
860
2013-14
467
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
96
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Jeffrey Dinowitz
Jeffrey D. Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
4,533
10.6%
% Minority Students
97.7%
2006-07
4,465
2007-08
4,398
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
4,391
2009-10
4,452
2010-11
4,417
2011-12
4,195
School
N/A
N/A
41.5%
2012-13
3,490
2013-14
2,707
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
97
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 78
Senate District # 34
Jose Rivera
Jeffrey D. Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
6
+ 13.4%
2005-06
527
91.7%
% Minority Students
98.8%
2006-07
575
2007-08
541
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
523
2009-10
498
2010-11
464
2011-12
449
School
N/A
N/A
32.1%
2012-13
422
2013-14
460
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
98
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 78
Senate District # 33
Jose Rivera
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,481
100.0%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
1,480
2007-08
1,454
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,487
2009-10
1,472
2010-11
1,374
2011-12
1,160
School
N/A
N/A
27.7%
2012-13
715
2013-14
408
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
99
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 80
Senate District # 36
Mark Gjonaj
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
917
82.1%
% Minority Students
95.0%
2006-07
754
2007-08
673
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
658
2009-10
620
2010-11
652
2011-12
647
School
4.8%
5.2%
N/A
2012-13
654
2013-14
622
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
100
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
PS 85 Great Expectations
Victor Pichardo
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,167
98.4%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
1,122
2007-08
1,163
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,167
2009-10
1,195
2010-11
1,131
2011-12
1,089
School
7.1%
4.7%
N/A
2012-13
1,057
2013-14
998
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
101
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 86
Senate District # 33
Victor Pichardo
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
860
87.8%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
795
2007-08
757
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
742
2009-10
699
2010-11
633
2011-12
623
School
7.3%
7.6%
N/A
2012-13
632
2013-14
583
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
102
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 80
Senate District # 34
Mark Gjonaj
Jeffrey D. Klein
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
348
69.7%
% Minority Students
94.1%
2006-07
361
2007-08
333
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
367
2009-10
408
2010-11
426
2011-12
480
School
N/A
N/A
47.5%
2012-13
478
2013-14
498
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
103
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 83
Senate District # 36
Carl Heastie
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
209
92.9%
% Minority Students
98.3%
2006-07
413
2007-08
573
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
523
2009-10
486
2010-11
487
2011-12
429
School
8.3%
7.5%
N/A
2012-13
354
2013-14
298
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
104
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Carl Heastie
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,064
89.1%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
1,049
2007-08
1,068
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,034
2009-10
955
2010-11
824
2011-12
575
School
3.7%
5.5%
N/A
2012-13
435
2013-14
195
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
105
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
School Of Diplomacy
Carl Heastie
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
76.4%
% Minority Students
99.3%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
135
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
308
2009-10
433
2010-11
454
2011-12
391
School
5.2%
8.2%
N/A
2012-13
341
2013-14
277
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
106
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 83
Senate District # 36
Carl Heastie
Ruth Hassell-Thompson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
200
72.5%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
268
2007-08
328
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
330
2009-10
362
2010-11
363
2011-12
411
School
N/A
N/A
67.4%
2012-13
414
2013-14
402
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
107
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 85
Senate District # 32
Marcos Crespo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 13.4%
2005-06
170
94.6%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
249
2007-08
264
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
232
2009-10
235
2010-11
241
2011-12
252
School
9.8%
8.2%
N/A
2012-13
247
2013-14
250
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
108
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 85
Senate District # 32
Marcos Crespo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
3
+ 13.4%
2005-06
529
88.2%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
510
2007-08
523
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
499
2009-10
473
2010-11
450
2011-12
467
School
N/A
N/A
41.9%
2012-13
458
2013-14
464
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
109
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
PS 50 Clara Barton
Michael Blake
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
716
84.6%
% Minority Students
99.1%
2006-07
567
2007-08
576
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
511
2009-10
519
2010-11
477
2011-12
449
School
10.5%
6.7%
N/A
2012-13
402
2013-14
185
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
110
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
PS 92
Michael Blake
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
568
85.3%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
555
2007-08
526
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
501
2009-10
505
2010-11
482
2011-12
502
School
3.3%
4.3%
N/A
2012-13
474
2013-14
469
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
111
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Marcos Crespo
Ruben Diaz
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
518
95.0%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
438
2007-08
350
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
382
2009-10
352
2010-11
341
2011-12
325
School
4.2%
6.1%
N/A
2012-13
351
2013-14
354
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
112
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 79
Senate District # 33
Michael Blake
Gustavo Rivera
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
89.7%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
585
2007-08
626
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
619
2009-10
576
2010-11
581
2011-12
591
School
13.8%
10.7%
N/A
2012-13
596
2013-14
576
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
113
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Walter Mosley
Velmanette Montgomery
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
89.0%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
75
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
138
2009-10
195
2010-11
179
2011-12
154
School
3.9%
4.1%
N/A
2012-13
119
2013-14
85
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
114
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Joseph Lentol
Daniel Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
982
95.9%
% Minority Students
98.2%
2006-07
1,055
2007-08
1,132
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,010
2009-10
987
2010-11
888
2011-12
737
School
N/A
N/A
49.2%
2012-13
586
2013-14
437
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
115
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Foundations Academy
Annette Robinson
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
77.5%
% Minority Students
98.6%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
275
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
317
2009-10
224
2010-11
189
2011-12
138
School
N/A
N/A
13.0%
2012-13
147
2013-14
111
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
116
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Maritza Davila
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
736
91.5%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
720
2007-08
700
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
632
2009-10
541
2010-11
471
2011-12
413
School
3.9%
7.3%
N/A
2012-13
339
2013-14
304
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
117
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 50
Senate District # 26
Joseph Lentol
Daniel Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
738
75.9%
% Minority Students
97.5%
2006-07
704
2007-08
611
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
474
2009-10
420
2010-11
330
2011-12
319
School
10.5%
11.9%
N/A
2012-13
262
2013-14
264
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
118
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 50
Senate District # 26
Joseph Lentol
Daniel Squadron
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
787
100.0%
% Minority Students
96.7%
2006-07
879
2007-08
953
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
923
2009-10
911
2010-11
877
2011-12
864
School
3.8%
2.4%
54.2%
2012-13
806
2013-14
769
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
119
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Felix Ortiz
Velmanette Montgomery
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
580
89.4%
% Minority Students
94.9%
2006-07
483
2007-08
441
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
477
2009-10
498
2010-11
499
2011-12
491
School
8.2%
8.1%
N/A
2012-13
461
2013-14
491
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
120
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Annette Robinson
Velmanette Montgomery
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
4,400
84.4%
% Minority Students
99.5%
2006-07
4,045
2007-08
3,710
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,847
2009-10
2,302
2010-11
1,954
2011-12
1,597
School
N/A
N/A
39.8%
2012-13
1,127
2013-14
895
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
121
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 56
Senate District # 25
Annette Robinson
Velmanette Montgomery
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
348
89.1%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
424
2007-08
472
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
504
2009-10
506
2010-11
467
2011-12
438
School
4.0%
0.0%
45.5%
2012-13
257
2013-14
161
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
122
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
MS 584
Annette Robinson
Velmanette Montgomery
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
275
94.4%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
276
2007-08
287
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
303
2009-10
269
2010-11
224
2011-12
180
School
4.6%
1.7%
N/A
2012-13
147
2013-14
131
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
123
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 42
Senate District # 21
Rodneyse Bichotte
Kevin S. Parker
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
212
78.1%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
324
2007-08
437
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
423
2009-10
423
2010-11
399
2011-12
384
School
N/A
N/A
68.1%
2012-13
375
2013-14
338
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
124
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 57
Senate District # 20
Walter Mosley
Jesse Hamilton
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
84.8%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
304
2007-08
306
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
302
2009-10
259
2010-11
289
2011-12
194
School
N/A
N/A
7.5%
2012-13
134
2013-14
124
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
125
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 58
Senate District # 20
N. Nick Perry
Jesse Hamilton
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
68.9%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
89
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
143
2009-10
252
2010-11
241
2011-12
282
School
6.8%
3.6%
N/A
2012-13
273
2013-14
245
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
126
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 54
Senate District # 18
Erik Dilan
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
70.7%
% Minority Students
98.6%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
320
2009-10
420
2010-11
433
2011-12
434
School
N/A
N/A
47.1%
2012-13
417
2013-14
370
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
127
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 60
Senate District # 19
Charles Barron
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
210
75.2%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
306
2007-08
389
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
397
2009-10
420
2010-11
403
2011-12
378
School
N/A
N/A
64.1%
2012-13
336
2013-14
299
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
128
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Charles Barron
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
790
85.7%
% Minority Students
99.8%
2006-07
667
2007-08
572
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
543
2009-10
559
2010-11
517
2011-12
442
School
1.0%
3.1%
N/A
2012-13
392
2013-14
230
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
129
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Erik Dilan
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,263
80.0%
% Minority Students
99.3%
2006-07
1,128
2007-08
1,002
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
953
2009-10
1,017
2010-11
977
2011-12
924
School
7.9%
7.6%
N/A
2012-13
887
2013-14
551
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
130
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Charles Barron
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
738
98.4%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
693
2007-08
602
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
558
2009-10
533
2010-11
494
2011-12
454
School
4.4%
3.7%
N/A
2012-13
398
2013-14
363
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
131
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 41
Senate District # 19
Helene Weinstein
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,531
56.6%
% Minority Students
92.0%
2006-07
2,981
2007-08
2,673
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,458
2009-10
2,280
2010-11
2,152
2011-12
1,924
School
N/A
N/A
43.8%
2012-13
1,624
2013-14
1,140
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
132
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 55
Senate District # 18
Latrice Walker
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
72.3%
% Minority Students
99.6%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
150
2009-10
272
2010-11
270
2011-12
267
School
N/A
N/A
6.8%
2012-13
243
2013-14
233
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
133
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 55
Senate District # 19
Latrice Walker
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
N/A
82.2%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
235
2009-10
208
2010-11
204
2011-12
208
School
3.0%
5.3%
N/A
2012-13
174
2013-14
86
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
134
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
N. Nick Perry
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
569
87.2%
% Minority Students
98.8%
2006-07
602
2007-08
638
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
620
2009-10
615
2010-11
569
2011-12
558
School
9.1%
11.1%
N/A
2012-13
506
2013-14
445
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
135
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Latrice Walker
John L. Sampson
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
657
93.9%
% Minority Students
99.4%
2006-07
652
2007-08
585
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
506
2009-10
512
2010-11
522
2011-12
461
School
1.7%
6.5%
N/A
2012-13
326
2013-14
253
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
136
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 37
Senate District # 15
Catherine Nolan
Joseph P. Addabbo Jr
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,058
13.8%
% Minority Students
78.2%
2006-07
3,051
2007-08
2,957
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,774
2009-10
2,668
2010-11
2,425
2011-12
2,063
School
N/A
N/A
51.5%
2012-13
1,908
2013-14
1,866
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
137
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Ron Kim
Toby Ann Stavisky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
2,661
8.9%
% Minority Students
97.0%
2006-07
2,544
2007-08
2,613
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,618
2009-10
2,758
2010-11
3,045
2011-12
3,116
School
N/A
N/A
52.5%
2012-13
2,948
2013-14
2,559
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
138
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 33
Senate District # 14
Barbara Clark
Leroy Comrie
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,425
3.3%
% Minority Students
97.3%
2006-07
3,283
2007-08
3,169
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
2,952
2009-10
2,817
2010-11
2,551
2011-12
2,367
School
N/A
N/A
49.1%
2012-13
2,155
2013-14
2,041
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
139
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Vivan Cook
James Sanders Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,715
68.5%
% Minority Students
98.7%
2006-07
1,512
2007-08
1,382
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,226
2009-10
1,229
2010-11
1,170
2011-12
1,024
School
N/A
N/A
28.4%
2012-13
958
2013-14
823
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
140
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Michael Miller
James Sanders Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,358
9.1%
% Minority Students
96.6%
2006-07
3,173
2007-08
3,276
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
3,370
2009-10
3,252
2010-11
3,309
2011-12
3,325
School
N/A
N/A
51.4%
2012-13
3,121
2013-14
2,778
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
141
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
MS 53 Brian Piccolo
Phillip Goldfeder
James Sanders Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
883
80.1%
% Minority Students
99.2%
2006-07
762
2007-08
649
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
620
2009-10
549
2010-11
504
2011-12
445
School
2.8%
5.7%
N/A
2012-13
387
2013-14
347
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
142
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
David Weprin
James Sanders Jr.
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,619
66.9%
% Minority Students
97.6%
2006-07
3,676
2007-08
3,602
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
3,507
2009-10
3,179
2010-11
2,918
2011-12
2,547
School
N/A
N/A
48.5%
2012-13
2,287
2013-14
2,181
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
143
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Vivan Cook
Leroy Comrie
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,032
80.9%
% Minority Students
99.3%
2006-07
975
2007-08
908
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
821
2009-10
719
2010-11
742
2011-12
749
School
9.8%
11.7%
N/A
2012-13
675
2013-14
573
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
144
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Aravella Simotas
Michael Gianaris
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
3,824
9.9%
% Minority Students
89.0%
2006-07
3,432
2007-08
3,352
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
3,207
2009-10
3,307
2010-11
3,519
2011-12
3,359
School
N/A
N/A
56.2%
2012-13
2,973
2013-14
2,516
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
145
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Catherine Nolan
Michael Gianaris
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
407
86.5%
% Minority Students
93.5%
2006-07
362
2007-08
379
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
362
2009-10
404
2010-11
423
2011-12
401
School
9.2%
8.5%
N/A
2012-13
415
2013-14
368
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
146
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Assembly District # 54
Senate District # 18
Erik Dilan
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.4%
2005-06
300
95.0%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
417
2007-08
459
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
489
2009-10
482
2010-11
503
2011-12
461
School
N/A
N/A
61.8%
2012-13
414
2013-14
363
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
147
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Maritza Davila
Martin Malav Dilan
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 13.4%
2005-06
1,020
96.4%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
886
2007-08
833
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
686
2009-10
659
2010-11
653
2011-12
641
School
5.9%
5.9%
N/A
2012-13
591
2013-14
518
$7,662,346,027
$8,689,947,154
+ $1,027,601,127
+ 13.4%
1,056,195
$8,228
$20,226
$10,608
+ 90.7%
76.1%
12.7%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
148
16
15
9%
83%
7%
1%
Frank Skartados
Sue Serino
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 13.0%
2005-06
1,248
84.2%
% Minority Students
85.0%
2006-07
1,278
2007-08
1,253
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,264
2009-10
1,245
2010-11
1,177
2011-12
1,176
School
N/A
N/A
57.8%
2012-13
1,136
2013-14
1,145
$51,185,236
$57,843,771
+ $6,658,535
+ 13.0%
4,326
$13,371
$19,063
$10,608
+ 79.7%
High Need
Urban Suburban
94.2%
10.4%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
150
16
15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Frank Skartados
Sue Serino
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 13.0%
2005-06
879
87.9%
% Minority Students
87.8%
2006-07
907
2007-08
848
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,000
2009-10
996
2010-11
1,017
2011-12
968
School
4.3%
10.3%
N/A
2012-13
973
2013-14
956
$51,185,236
$57,843,771
+ $6,658,535
+ 13.0%
4,326
$13,371
$19,063
$10,608
+ 79.7%
High Need
Urban Suburban
94.2%
10.4%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
151
16
15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Joseph Morelle
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 17.5%
2005-06
1,012
77.6%
% Minority Students
83.4%
2006-07
1,030
2007-08
1,107
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,049
2009-10
1,007
2010-11
1,046
2011-12
864
School
N/A
N/A
26.0%
2012-13
531
2013-14
505
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
153
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 17.5%
2005-06
967
29.8%
% Minority Students
95.5%
2006-07
903
2007-08
988
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,066
2009-10
1,042
2010-11
1,064
2011-12
985
School
N/A
N/A
35.8%
2012-13
530
2013-14
547
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
154
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Rich Funke
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 17.5%
2005-06
1,960
72.1%
% Minority Students
91.7%
2006-07
1,901
2007-08
1,891
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,940
2009-10
1,694
2010-11
1,714
2011-12
1,728
School
1.4%
2.0%
40.2%
2012-13
1,720
2013-14
1,851
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
155
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Harry Bronson
Rich Funke
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 17.5%
2005-06
1,192
86.2%
% Minority Students
96.8%
2006-07
1,292
2007-08
1,316
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,137
2009-10
1,094
2010-11
1,074
2011-12
1,190
School
0.5%
1.0%
35.4%
2012-13
1,109
2013-14
1,141
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
156
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Harry Bronson
Rich Funke
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
6
+ 17.5%
2005-06
N/A
79.2%
% Minority Students
92.4%
2006-07
156
2007-08
299
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
363
2009-10
410
2010-11
472
2011-12
530
School
1.0%
2.0%
18.8%
2012-13
544
2013-14
499
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
157
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Harry Bronson
Rich Funke
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 17.5%
2005-06
N/A
82.3%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
145
2007-08
269
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
332
2009-10
405
2010-11
440
2011-12
480
School
2.0%
2.2%
36.2%
2012-13
502
2013-14
573
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
158
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 17.5%
2005-06
473
97.3%
% Minority Students
93.0%
2006-07
450
2007-08
514
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
527
2009-10
517
2010-11
568
2011-12
597
School
3.5%
1.6%
N/A
2012-13
667
2013-14
670
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
159
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 17.5%
2005-06
506
100.0%
% Minority Students
98.3%
2006-07
477
2007-08
477
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
464
2009-10
438
2010-11
445
2011-12
424
School
2.7%
2.2%
N/A
2012-13
483
2013-14
485
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
160
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 17.5%
2005-06
737
96.0%
% Minority Students
96.0%
2006-07
686
2007-08
669
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
651
2009-10
621
2010-11
665
2011-12
645
School
3.4%
3.5%
N/A
2012-13
646
2013-14
655
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
161
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Joseph Morelle
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 17.5%
2005-06
497
92.1%
% Minority Students
80.1%
2006-07
449
2007-08
433
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
461
2009-10
490
2010-11
500
2011-12
468
School
9.3%
4.7%
N/A
2012-13
469
2013-14
465
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
162
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Joseph Morelle
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 17.5%
2005-06
532
93.0%
% Minority Students
81.5%
2006-07
519
2007-08
553
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
560
2009-10
572
2010-11
584
2011-12
556
School
4.7%
2.3%
N/A
2012-13
561
2013-14
604
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
163
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Michael Ranzenhofer
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 17.5%
2005-06
330
92.2%
% Minority Students
95.3%
2006-07
279
2007-08
314
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
332
2009-10
370
2010-11
384
2011-12
424
School
5.5%
2.0%
N/A
2012-13
434
2013-14
401
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
164
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Rich Funke
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 17.5%
2005-06
722
93.3%
% Minority Students
95.4%
2006-07
671
2007-08
669
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
679
2009-10
642
2010-11
646
2011-12
670
School
2.1%
1.6%
N/A
2012-13
730
2013-14
685
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
165
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 17.5%
2005-06
593
93.0%
% Minority Students
95.0%
2006-07
530
2007-08
506
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
518
2009-10
543
2010-11
517
2011-12
612
School
1.6%
1.8%
N/A
2012-13
671
2013-14
622
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
166
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
David Gantt
Joseph Robach
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 17.5%
2005-06
699
99.6%
% Minority Students
98.5%
2006-07
647
2007-08
697
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
675
2009-10
665
2010-11
708
2011-12
722
School
5.0%
2.3%
N/A
2012-13
744
2013-14
767
$443,998,397
$521,685,077
+ $77,686,680
+ 17.5%
32,674
$15,966
$18,762
$10,608
+ 76.9%
90.0%
10.9%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
167
16
15
2%
58%
37%
2%
Earlene Hooper
Michael Venditto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 21.9%
2005-06
782
67.9%
% Minority Students
100.0%
2006-07
797
2007-08
799
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
779
2009-10
750
2010-11
755
2011-12
793
School
N/A
N/A
69.6%
2012-13
778
2013-14
846
$44,280,627
$53,997,357
+ $9,716,730
+ 21.9%
3,687
$14,645
$23,854
$10,608
+ 124.9%
High Need
Urban Suburban
79.9%
17.6%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
169
16
15
4%
77%
9%
9%
Earlene Hooper
Michael Venditto
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 21.9%
2005-06
406
92.4%
% Minority Students
99.7%
2006-07
427
2007-08
379
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
554
2009-10
556
2010-11
630
2011-12
632
School
N/A
N/A
N/A
2012-13
627
2013-14
434
$44,280,627
$53,997,357
+ $9,716,730
+ 21.9%
3,687
$14,645
$23,854
$10,608
+ 124.9%
High Need
Urban Suburban
79.9%
17.6%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
170
16
15
4%
77%
9%
9%
Angelo Santabarbara
Hugh T. Farley
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.8%
2005-06
331
87.1%
% Minority Students
73.2%
2006-07
451
2007-08
431
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
410
2009-10
400
2010-11
441
2011-12
403
School
10.0%
10.6%
N/A
2012-13
437
2013-14
454
$90,744,987
$102,379,182
+ $11,634,195
+ 12.8%
10,263
$9,976
$16,262
$10,608
+ 53.3%
High Need
Urban Suburban
74.7%
4.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
172
16
15
39%
50%
9%
2%
Lincoln School
Angelo Santabarbara
Hugh T. Farley
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.8%
2005-06
354
85.7%
% Minority Students
79.3%
2006-07
390
2007-08
377
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
314
2009-10
381
2010-11
368
2011-12
352
School
9.8%
12.8%
N/A
2012-13
329
2013-14
309
$90,744,987
$102,379,182
+ $11,634,195
+ 12.8%
10,263
$9,976
$16,262
$10,608
+ 53.3%
High Need
Urban Suburban
74.7%
4.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
173
16
15
39%
50%
9%
2%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.6%
2005-06
405
90.4%
% Minority Students
83.4%
2006-07
381
2007-08
374
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
406
2009-10
392
2010-11
427
2011-12
415
School
10.6%
3.9%
N/A
2012-13
446
2013-14
483
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
175
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 12.6%
2005-06
592
92.9%
% Minority Students
95.2%
2006-07
576
2007-08
558
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
493
2009-10
463
2010-11
493
2011-12
516
School
2.0%
1.8%
N/A
2012-13
462
2013-14
452
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
176
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Delaware Academy
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
501
99.5%
% Minority Students
87.8%
2006-07
492
2007-08
481
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
460
2009-10
445
2010-11
401
2011-12
461
School
3.6%
1.6%
N/A
2012-13
523
2013-14
544
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
177
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
497
96.5%
% Minority Students
98.6%
2006-07
498
2007-08
466
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
535
2009-10
509
2010-11
509
2011-12
547
School
7.4%
2.3%
N/A
2012-13
579
2013-14
598
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
178
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.6%
2005-06
678
84.3%
% Minority Students
79.1%
2006-07
638
2007-08
684
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
696
2009-10
757
2010-11
757
2011-12
712
School
3.3%
6.9%
N/A
2012-13
702
2013-14
726
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
179
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
1,357
82.9%
% Minority Students
78.3%
2006-07
1,208
2007-08
1,086
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,075
2009-10
1,214
2010-11
1,154
2011-12
1,150
School
N/A
N/A
30.3%
2012-13
1,150
2013-14
1,321
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
180
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
John A. DeFrancisco
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 12.6%
2005-06
771
83.9%
% Minority Students
69.3%
2006-07
744
2007-08
756
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
722
2009-10
715
2010-11
730
2011-12
722
School
N/A
N/A
N/A
2012-13
670
2013-14
682
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
181
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Frazer K - 8 School
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
837
85.2%
% Minority Students
75.2%
2006-07
808
2007-08
801
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
812
2009-10
794
2010-11
805
2011-12
821
School
7.0%
5.2%
N/A
2012-13
838
2013-14
928
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
182
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
779
89.0%
% Minority Students
66.9%
2006-07
709
2007-08
645
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
689
2009-10
670
2010-11
629
2011-12
601
School
5.0%
5.5%
N/A
2012-13
641
2013-14
647
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
183
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
1,732
71.5%
% Minority Students
66.0%
2006-07
1,703
2007-08
1,697
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,621
2009-10
1,648
2010-11
1,683
2011-12
1,619
School
N/A
N/A
49.5%
2012-13
1,676
2013-14
1,757
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
184
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
460
88.3%
% Minority Students
93.1%
2006-07
443
2007-08
423
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
453
2009-10
428
2010-11
494
2011-12
575
School
5.7%
3.7%
N/A
2012-13
612
2013-14
339
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
185
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
752
73.5%
% Minority Students
81.7%
2006-07
696
2007-08
706
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
766
2009-10
814
2010-11
784
2011-12
790
School
11.2%
12.4%
N/A
2012-13
777
2013-14
847
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
186
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
John A. DeFrancisco
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.6%
2005-06
577
86.4%
% Minority Students
74.1%
2006-07
508
2007-08
483
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
476
2009-10
420
2010-11
465
2011-12
513
School
2.2%
6.4%
N/A
2012-13
541
2013-14
565
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
187
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
1,338
74.0%
% Minority Students
77.4%
2006-07
1,291
2007-08
1,251
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,211
2009-10
1,314
2010-11
1,316
2011-12
1,220
School
N/A
N/A
59.6%
2012-13
1,194
2013-14
1,264
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
188
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 12.6%
2005-06
531
75.4%
% Minority Students
57.2%
2006-07
506
2007-08
527
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
511
2009-10
530
2010-11
523
2011-12
525
School
8.3%
2.5%
N/A
2012-13
512
2013-14
512
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
189
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
William Magnarelli
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 12.6%
2005-06
417
98.9%
% Minority Students
90.6%
2006-07
380
2007-08
379
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
387
2009-10
429
2010-11
448
2011-12
513
School
4.5%
4.3%
N/A
2012-13
506
2013-14
508
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
190
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
5
+ 12.6%
2005-06
355
82.0%
% Minority Students
87.0%
2006-07
335
2007-08
351
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
366
2009-10
365
2010-11
357
2011-12
336
School
4.0%
4.0%
N/A
2012-13
322
2013-14
351
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
191
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
Sam Roberts
David J. Valesky
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
3
+ 12.6%
2005-06
N/A
93.7%
% Minority Students
86.8%
2006-07
N/A
2007-08
N/A
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
N/A
2009-10
N/A
2010-11
N/A
2011-12
427
School
1.0%
1.8%
N/A
2012-13
395
2013-14
411
$258,353,041
$290,823,879
+ $32,470,838
+ 12.6%
22,112
$13,152
$18,387
$10,608
+ 73.3%
81.5%
13.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
192
16
15
2%
58%
33%
6%
PS 2
John McDonald
Neil D. Breslin
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 29.9%
2005-06
339
94.8%
% Minority Students
72.3%
2006-07
326
2007-08
358
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
366
2009-10
383
2010-11
376
2011-12
403
School
5.0%
5.1%
N/A
2012-13
328
2013-14
298
$46,675,664
$60,628,702
+ $13,953,038
+ 29.9%
4,901
$12,371
$19,014
$10,608
+ 79.2%
High Need
Urban Suburban
68.5%
1.5%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
194
16
15
16%
75%
6%
2%
Anthony Brindisi
Joseph A. Griffo
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 18.4%
2005-06
226
97.4%
% Minority Students
91.9%
2006-07
237
2007-08
233
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
248
2009-10
273
2010-11
283
2011-12
341
School
9.1%
4.5%
N/A
2012-13
347
2013-14
302
$92,891,739
$110,007,540
+ $17,115,801
+ 18.4%
10,072
$10,922
$15,129
$10,608
+ 42.6%
High Need
Urban Suburban
83.0%
16.5%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
196
16
15
9%
55%
26%
10%
Kimberly Jean-Pierre
Phil Boyle
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 27.1%
2005-06
480
60.3%
% Minority Students
99.3%
2006-07
406
2007-08
410
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
390
2009-10
412
2010-11
406
2011-12
440
School
8.9%
7.5%
N/A
2012-13
461
2013-14
454
$30,772,294
$39,117,673
+ $8,345,379
+ 27.1%
2,226
$17,573
$24,328
$10,608
+ 129.3%
High Need
Urban Suburban
80.0%
16.5%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
198
16
15
100%
0%
0%
0%
Shelley Mayer
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 15.8%
2005-06
958
83.8%
% Minority Students
92.8%
2006-07
757
2007-08
680
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
863
2009-10
855
2010-11
704
2011-12
650
School
6.8%
7.8%
N/A
2012-13
592
2013-14
640
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
200
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Assembly District # 90
Senate District # 35
Shelley Mayer
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 15.8%
2005-06
881
90.1%
% Minority Students
98.2%
2006-07
889
2007-08
847
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
885
2009-10
920
2010-11
939
2011-12
882
School
15.2%
7.0%
N/A
2012-13
839
2013-14
873
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
201
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Assembly District # 90
Senate District # 35
Shelley Mayer
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 15.8%
2005-06
454
78.0%
% Minority Students
99.0%
2006-07
440
2007-08
400
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
378
2009-10
407
2010-11
478
2011-12
522
School
4.6%
2.2%
N/A
2012-13
527
2013-14
534
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
202
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Museum School 25
Shelley Mayer
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
6
+ 15.8%
2005-06
429
88.5%
% Minority Students
98.7%
2006-07
464
2007-08
406
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
404
2009-10
413
2010-11
448
2011-12
430
School
13.1%
8.6%
N/A
2012-13
391
2013-14
359
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
203
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Shelley Mayer
George Latimer
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
7
+ 15.8%
2005-06
725
90.3%
% Minority Students
96.8%
2006-07
841
2007-08
827
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
826
2009-10
848
2010-11
775
2011-12
751
School
14.3%
10.1%
N/A
2012-13
719
2013-14
736
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
204
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Shelley Mayer
George Latimer
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
Yes
10
+ 15.8%
2005-06
1,829
85.3%
% Minority Students
90.8%
2006-07
1,655
2007-08
1,403
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
1,133
2009-10
1,039
2010-11
871
2011-12
729
School
N/A
N/A
58.6%
2012-13
764
2013-14
738
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
205
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
Assembly District # 90
Senate District # 35
Shelley Mayer
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
4
+ 15.8%
2005-06
491
76.6%
% Minority Students
94.7%
2006-07
456
2007-08
498
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
546
2009-10
543
2010-11
565
2011-12
575
School
12.2%
12.1%
N/A
2012-13
576
2013-14
596
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
206
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%
School 13
J. Gary Pretlow
Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Summary
2014-15 Status
Priority / Failing
No
8
+ 15.8%
2005-06
485
90.5%
% Minority Students
95.4%
2006-07
486
2007-08
483
State Avg.
35.8%
31.4%
76.4%
526
2009-10
542
2010-11
566
2011-12
552
School
11.6%
7.1%
N/A
2012-13
560
2013-14
618
$206,361,313
$239,014,758
+ $32,653,445
+ 15.8%
26,231
$9,112
$18,798
$10,608
+ 77.2%
67.3%
10.2%
4
5
6
7
8
9
% Highly Effective
% Effective
% Developing
% Ineffective
#
#
#
#
21
20
19
18
17
207
16
15
31%
53%
14%
3%