Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning LTE
Articles, updates on LTE from 3GPP standard specifications
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
If the legacy circuit network also has an associated packet capability and is capable of
supporting concurrent circuit/packet operations, the subscribers data sessions can be
handed over to the legacy network in conjunction with switching the voice call from the
packet to the circuit domain. In this case when the voice call finishes and the mobile reenters LTE coverage, these packet sessions can be handed back to the LTE.
If operators look to limit LTE deployments to high traffic areas and at the same time wish to
transition voice service in those areas to VoIP, then SRVCC is exactly what they need.
If on the other hand operators do not plan to migrate their voice service to VoIP, then
SRVCC is not for them. If an operator does plan to migrate to VoIP and also plans to roll out
ubiquitous LTE coverage, then the question of whether or not to adopt SRVCC is more
complicated. While SRVCC does not require modifications to what is certainly the
operators largest legacy investment, the RAN, it does require a significant modification of
the operators legacy core and also requires full deployment of IMS circuit-packet
continuity services. Given the cost of these changes, deployment of SRVCC purely as an
interim measure to allow early rollout of VoIP-based services may not make financial
sense.
Source: Motorola's WhitePaper on "LTE Inter-technology Mobility"
vikram k
Share
13 comments:
Mahesh Thursday, June 30, 2011
Why not the same PS call(IMS) will not do a HO to UTRAN as a general PS handover. In that case
what is the use of SRVCC.
Reply
Reply
Regarding neighbours:
The UE shall support measuring UTRAN/ GERAN carriers in the RRC connected state.
Network is telling UE which cell should be measure by measurement request/config in RRC
RECONFIGURATION MESSAGE
TROMEK
Reply
Comment as:
Publish
Google Account
Preview
Home
Powered by Blogger.