IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA

FELONY DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA
vs.

UCN:

DENNIS D. CORREA
SPN: 01073379

REF:

521993CF007005XXXXBI
CJ"

CRC9307005~NO.q-

a,.~

/9~~_ :-

MOTION TO AMEND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION

"'G

::::;!21
c11
C;~J
i rJ -r\

.-: -;. . :sc:...,. . ..~

. -r'. -".. .:.

1'""'-"

::~J.~~

~; ~~
~

~-:.~'?-J
~
.....
~

Comes now, the defendant, by and through his undersigned attorney, a@:J~~ves~s
~

c:

honorable court for an order, amending the conditions of his probation, and as grounds therefor
'Nould show:

The defendant has been placed on probation and has been compliant with the terms

and conditions of his probati9n since November 8, 1003. Because some confusion has arisen
concerning the allocation of distribution of restitution, the defendant needs an order stating that the
{estitution payments made by the defendant will be applied to Count 5 until November 7, 2008. or
until paid in full; thereafter, restitution payments made by the defendant shall be distributed
prorateeJly as to Counts 1, 2 and 3 until November 7, 2023, or until paid in full. Any additional
monies paid sl"1211 be distributed to the Florida Bar Association as reimbursement to their Client's
Compensation Fund. The state has no objection to this proposed order.
2.

Defendant needs to be able to attend his annual holy day feasts as selected by his

church wherever they may be situated with the United States and the District of Columbia. The
state

ha~

no objection, provided the defendant provides an itinerary to the probation officer,

together with telephone numbers where he can be reached and any changes to the itinerary must
be reported to the probation officer as soon as feasible thereafter.
3.

Some confusion has arisen concerning whether or not the defendant is subject to

1
g.

a curfew as term of his probation. The defendant needs the court to specifically state that he does
not have a curfew as a condition of his probation. The state has no objection to the court deleting
any reference to a curfew from the order of probation and the state has no objection to the
defendant having no curfew.
4.

The defendant has a need to travel outside Pinellas County for employment

purposes and often, this need arises without sufficient time to contact the probation office to obtain
pernlission. The state has no objection to the court entering an order aiiowing the defendant to
travel outside Pinellas County for employment purposes without the necessity of obtaining prior
approval from the probation officer and/or the probation department and, if necessary, the state
has no objection to the defendant staying overnight if the overnight stay is solely related to his
employment. The state requires that any overnight stay be reported to the probation officer at the
earliest time after it has transpired.
WHEREFORE, the defendant herein respectfully prays that this honorable court will enter
its order, amending the terms and conditions of probation as set forth hereinabove.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I t-IEREBY CERTIFY that a copy hereof has been furnished by U.S. Mail to the Office of
Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, P. O. Box 5028, Clearwater, FL 33758, and to Victor Mims,
Department of Corrections, Probation & Parole, 3350 Ulmerton Road, Suite 25, Clearwater, Florida
33762 on August

3g

2004.

/GREGORY ~. QLNEY, II
/ MEROS, SMITH & OLNEY, P.A.
P. O. Box 27
/
St. Petersburg, FL 33731
\v
(727)822-4929 Fax: (727)821-7140
FBN: 362913/ SPN 241712
Attorney for Defendant