Master Research Project 3 (Literature Review Outline) Instructions Literature Review Outline - To organize your ideas and writing, an outline is required. This outline is for your own literature review (i.e., the Introduction section of your own paper). The outline should identify the themes (major ideas) on your topic based on your ten selected articles and your own reflection. You are also encouraged to create an outline for other sections of the Major Research Project although it is not a requirement. The literature review outline (MRP3) should reflect a strong sense of understanding of the problem being investigated. Description MRP3 requires you to create an outline for the literature review portion of your MRP project/ paper. This assignment is intended to allow you to communicate with your instructor regarding your proposed approach to your research project. Do not list the titles and/or abstracts of your selected sources as part of your outline. Your outline shall consist of main topics or themes developed through the research and theories used to support the structure of the research. Resources: Four Main Components for Effective Outlines (from Purdue Online Writing Lab) Link: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/544/01/ Writing for Professional Publication: An Organizational Paradigm (by Thomas J. Buttery) Link: http://www.apsu.edu/srate/JournalEditions/191/buttery.pdf Literature reviews (from UNC) Link: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/literature_review.html Frequently Asked Questions: Q: What do you mean by headings? Answer: Headings are the benchmarks of your manuscript. Each heading must represent the theme or an important portion of the research problem. Meaningful headings help organize the literature review section; contents from sources are mentioned under the appropriate heading. Q: Can I use one word as a heading in my integrative review outline? Answer: Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Your reader must be able to interpret the meaning and direction of where you wish to take the study. One word may not always express what is needed.
Example (for illustrative purpose only):
Name: Kurt Y. Michael Title: The Effect of a Computer Simulation Activity versus a Hands-on Activity on Product Creativity in Technology Education I. Overview of computer use and computer simulations A. Computer use in the classroom B. Defining computer simulations C. Educational benefits of computer simulations for learning II. Background information on Product Creativity A. Product creativity in technology education B. The creative person C. The creative process D. Evaluating the creative product in industrial arts/ technology education E. Computers and the creative product Research Question: 1. Is there any difference in product creativity between the computer simulation and traditional hands-on groups? How to submit: Save your work as a Microsoft Word document (.doc), attach the assignment to an email and submit the email via Canvas. Name your file in this fashion: Last name_assignment name. A possible example might be Wilson_MRP3. Criteria Use of headings guide the reader Headings start broad and narrow to address research problem Clear transition from one heading to the next Headings in outline address questions reader may have about research problem Outline and extended description listed above is adequately addressed 10 points - It meets all the requirements and needs no revision. 8-9 points - It meets most requirements and needs few/or some revision. 6-7 points - It meets some requirements and needs more revision. 1-5 points - It meets few requirements and needs further systematic revision. 0 points - It does not meet any requirements.