Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Email: sbhatia@mit.edu
Email: sonal@mit.edu
Email: vyas@mit.edu
Room: 66-154
Time: Tues/Thurs 2:30-4 PM
Course website: https://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/HST/sp15/HST.500/
Course Objectives:
The purpose of this course is to provide training in scientific proposal writing and to introduce HST
graduate students to the various research strands within the MEMP program. The goals of the course are
to:
Create a core experience for first-year MEMPs
Provide structured, substantive introduction to research areas in biomedical engineering
Prepare MEMP students for their oral qualifying exam
The course will include proposal writing workshops and didactic lectures that introduce MEMP research
areas which students may want to consider while writing scientific proposals. Although professional
scientists use many forms of communication in their professional lives, we focus specifically on proposal
writing in this course. The proposal writing workshops will teach students the elements of successful
proposals as well as familiarize students with the larger professional contexts in which scientific research
proposals are written (thesis proposals, fellowship applications, research grant applications). Training in
scientific proposal writing is best obtained early in ones professional life. This course is offered in the
first year to all MEMP students so that students receive training in grant writing early enough that they
can use the skills learned in this class while writing their thesis proposals and grant applications for
continued graduate funding. HST 500 is offered in the spring in order to avoid conflicts with fall classes
required for MEMP technical qualifying exam.
Enrollment
This course is limited to an enrollment of 25 students. Priority is given to students in the MEMP program.
If more than 25 students wish to take the course, a decision will be made after the first class regarding
which students will be accepted.
Grading
Students will receive a letter grade on the basis of homework, class participation, and grant writing.
Attendance is required. Grades are calculated as follows: 20% attendance, 10% participation, and 70%
grant writing. The grant writing grade is distributed as follows:
10% Statement of Research
5% Background and Significance
5% Preliminary Data
5% Research Plan
5% Peer Review
10% Study Section Review
25% Final Revision
5% Responsiveness to Feedback
Attendance Policy
Attendance to class is mandatory, as workshops are essential to grant writing practice and the guest
lecturers have all been chosen to expose students to high-quality research that should not be missed. Two
unexcused absences will be allowed over the course of the semester, and excessive tardiness (20 minutes
or more) on any given day will result in a counted absence for that day. Additional absences due to illness
will need to be confirmed by a deans note.
Late Policy
Assignments are to be uploaded by 2:30 PM on the due date on Stellar. Late assignments will lose 50%
credit per day late (% credit awarded will be prorated hourly as 0.5 hours late /24), so be timely!
Plagiarism Policy
Your proposal should be new work created specifically for this course, and should be entirely your work.
You are encouraged to use a number of helpful resources as you develop your own proposal, including
several example proposals on the course website, advice from peers and colleagues, and the Writing
Center. However, you are not to recycle specific material or language from these examples or from
others work, including that of your mentor or colleagues.
Furthermore, in all academic writing, you must give citations each time you use someone else's ideas,
someone elses words, someone elses phrasing, someone elses unusual information. You show
appropriate respect for other writers and thinkers by giving them credit for their ideas, their structures,
their phrasings, and their information.
There are several guidelines for using sources in your academic writing:
Cite information that is not considered common knowledge, a direct quotation, or a summary
of anothers words/ideas.
When you quote, quote exactly, use quotation marks, and cite the source. In scientific writing
it is rare to actually quote another author. Typically writers paraphrase and cite.
When you summarize or paraphrase, you keep the meaning of the source but put it in your
own words and cite the original source.
Schedule:
Tues, 2/3:
S. Bhatia
Thurs, 2/10:
D. Anderson
Thurs, 2/12:
Tues, 2/17:
J. Karp
Thurs, 2/19:
S. Bhatia/S. Jhaveri
This workshop will show you how to write the Background and Significance section of a
proposal.
Bring hardcopy of Statement Of Research (SOR) to class for peer review.
Homework: Revise SOR and add Background & Significance section. Find relevant
research articles that support your research aims. Add this material to your Statement of
Research and revise into a proposal with a Background and Significance (B&S) section
(3 single-spaced pages for B&S). Due March 5 on the Stellar website by 2:30 PM. Also
bring a hardcopy to class on March 5 for peer review.
Tues, 2/24:
R. Langer
Thurs, 2/26:
L. Bourouiba
Tues, 3/3:
M. Toner
Thurs, 3/5:
S. Bhatia/S. Jhaveri
A. Chakraborty
Thurs, 3/12:
B. Rosen
Tues, 3/17:
C. Stultz
Thurs, 3/19:
F. Zhang
Tues, 3/31:
Bhatia /Jhaveri
This workshop will show you how to write the Research Plan section of your proposal.
(assignments on next page)
Bring hardcopy of revised SOR/B&S with added Preliminary Data section to class for
peer review.
Homework: Revise proposal and add Research Plan (RP). Design a Research Plan with
Rationale, Plan, Methods, Anticipated Results and Potential Limitations Section for each
specific aim (4 single-spaced pages for RP). Add this to your SOR, B&S, and PD sections
and revise into a proposal with Research Plan. Due on the Stellar website by 2:30 pm on
April 14.
Thurs, 4/2:
J. Collins
Tues, 4/7:
R. Jain
Thurs, 4/9:
T. Heldt
Tues, 4/14:
Thurs, 4/16:
Tues, 4/21:
Thurs, 4/23:
Tues, 4/28:
No class (Cancelled)
Thurs, 4/30:
A. Shalek
K. Chung
P. Ghoroghchian
Homework: Study Section critique. Read and critique your proposal assignments.
Prepare a written review to be uploaded to Stellar by May 7 at 2:30 pm. Also bring a
hardcopy to class on May 7 for the study section.
Tues, 5/5:
E. Edelman
Thurs, 5/7:
Critiques must be uploaded to Stellar by 2:30pm. Bring a hardcopy to class for the
study section.
Homework: Incorporate your critiques into a Final Proposal due May 14 at 2:30pm.
Tues, 5/12:
Thurs, 5/14:
P. Anikeeva
Final Proposal due Thursday, May 14 and must be uploaded to Stellar by 2:30pm.