Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Higit Pa
Susunod na Blog
Bumuo ng Blog
Mag-sign in
Scribbles of a Lunatic
Mind
I'M A SCHIZOPHRENIC! I'M HAPPY! I'M PROUD TO BE ONE!
HOME
Home
POSTS RSS
Political Law
COMMENTS RSS
EDIT
Share
FOLLOW BY EMAIL
Subscribe in a reader
CATEGORIES
bar exam questionnaire (8)
case digests (612)
Civil Law (123)
Commercial Law (89)
Criminal Law (102)
Respondents have argued that the petitioners are guilty of two fatal
technical effects: first, error in choosing to assail R.A. 9716 via the
Remedy of Certiorari and Prohibition under Rule 65 of the Rules of
Court. And second, petitioners have no locus standi to question the
constitutionality of R.A. 9716.
Issue: Whether or not Republic Act No. 9716 is unconstitutional and
therefore null and void, or whether or not a population of 250,000 is
an indispensable constitutional requirement for the creation of a new
legislative district in a province.
Held: It was ruled that the said Act is constitutional. The plain and
clear distinction between a city and a province was explained under
the second sentence of Section 5 (3) of the Constitution. It states
that a province is entitled into a representative, with nothing was
Followers (9)
promo/discounts/freebies (56)
Psychiatry (5)
Remedial Law (112)
Taxation (85)
villarama doctrines (103)
0 COMMENTS: ON "AQUINO III VS. COMELEC, G.R. NO. 189793, APRIL 7, 2010"
POST A COMMENT
Comment as:
Publish
Google Account
Preview
Newer Post
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Home
Older Post
374,067
RECOMMENDED READS
bethere2day
blog-links-exchange
BLOG-PH.com
Maruism
NURSINGnle
Philippine
Databank
Scire Licet
The Digester
Uberdigests
ARCHIVE
Archive
Case
Digests
Scribbles of a Luna
Mind
I'M A SCHIZOPHRENIC! I'M HAPPY! I'M PROUD TO BE ONE!
HOME
Home
POSTS RSS
Political Law
DISCLAIMER
POPULAR POSTS
FOLLOWERS
Members (15)