Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 Introduction
The goal of Optimizing Ventilation Performance in Commercial Buildings is to achieve and
document the delivery of adequate ventilation to the building occupants in such a way that
no more energy is required to accomplish this task then is absolutely necessary. The delivery of adequate ventilation to building occupants is important because it is a basic requirement for achieving good indoor air quality. As with any other building performance parameter, it cannot be assessed and managed unless the amount of actual ventilation is known
with some degree of certainty. Additional reasons for the understanding of ventilation
performance include the application of a Green Building philosophy, with the HVAC system
functioning as intended both initially and over the life of the building. The ability to assess
ventilation performance can also be considered a component of Commissioning for much the
same reason. This presentation will therefore include a discussion of how ventilation can be
evaluated.
There are several ways of obtaining information on ventilation performance with the measurement of CO2 concentrations. Options vary from just a few grab samples, up through
continuous monitoring with automatic data logging. In all cases, some information on
ventilation performance is provided. The question remains, however, as to the minimum
level of CO2 monitoring data necessary for the optimization of ventilation performance. The
criteria for assessing this include both the accuracy of the CO2 monitoring data and how
representative it is of building conditions. Accuracy is a function of the calibration of the
CO2 detector and whether or not it is unduly influenced by the direct exhaled breath of either
the building occupants or the investigator. Unfortunately it has been my experience that CO2
detectors have a definite tendency to drift. Therefore, if one is to have confidence in the CO2
monitoring data obtained, there must be periodic calibration checks of the detector response.
4.0 Representativeness of CO2 Monitoring Data
Since individual CO2 measurements reflect the dynamic interaction of the number and duration of the people present and the ability of the HVAC system to dilute and remove air
contaminants, one should have a continuous polling of CO2 concentrations through the day
to determine both the maximum and minimum differences between indoor and outdoor
values. The focus on the difference between indoor and outdoor CO2 concentrations comes
from information in ASTM D6245, Standard Guide for Using Indoor Carbon Dioxide Concentrations to Evaluate Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation. This resource not only points out
that it is this difference that can be used to calculate ventilation rates, it also states that when
using CO2 concentration for the purposes described in this guide, the outdoor CO2 concentration must be measured. This document also mentions a distance of 2 meters from any
occupant as sufficient to avoid the effects of the air exhaled by individual people.
In terms of being representative of the building, the more locations included the better. The
locations monitored should include both those spaces with the greatest potential for the
highest occupancies and those spaces served by the ends of the HVAC distribution system.
5.0 Shared-Sensor, Vacuum-Draw Approach to CO2 Monitoring
One approach to obtaining the information necessary for optimizing ventilation performance
is with a monitoring system that uses a vacuum-draw, shared-sensor technology. With this
approach, just one CO2 sensor is shared among up to 48 locations, with air from all locations
being analyzed by just this one individual sensor. The advantages of this approach over
distributed sensors are significant. This way any
differences observed between differing locations will definitely be real, as opposed to possibly just being due to different responses of different sensors. In addition, the vacuum-draw
approach makes it easier to maintain the single sensor in calibration as compared with maintaining the calibration on numerous distributed sensors. A additional advantage of the
vacuum-draw approach accrues from the greater flexibility of locating the end of the sampling tube approximately 2 meters from the nearest person as compared with distributed
sensors that might be impacted by people much closer than 2 meters.