Professional Documents
Culture Documents
omniscient point of view. Which leaves us with a question (or three): why choose a first-person narrator at all? Why not
just a third-person and be done with it? And how "invisible" and "non-judgmental" is Nick, really?
The Great Gatsby Genre
Literary Fiction, Modernism, Satire
We admit it, "literary fiction" is a little bit of a cop-out: it's an umbrella term for a story or novel that focuses more on
character development and style than on page-turning plots. Less Twilight; more Freedom. This is the kind of lit that you
usually read in school: books that provoke discussion over what it all means. The Great Gatsby definitely fits. Fitzgerald
is much more interested in plumbing the depths of Gatsby's heart and in experimenting with symbolic language than he
is in working through the latest forensic evidence to figure out who hit Myrtle with his (or her) car. We're not talking CSI:
West Egg. And the way Nick's narration jumps around, shifting from dialogue to personal meditation to foreshadowing
and back again, tips us off thatThe Great Gatsby is also a Modernist work. It's fragmented and non-linear, because it's
trying to get at difficult truths that a more realistic book might not capture. (So, if The Great Gatsby floats your boat,
check out some of our learning guides on Fitzgerald's fellow modernists, like Ernest Hemingway or James Joyce.)
The Great Gatsby Writing Style
Hold on to your hats, Shmoopsters, because once you ride the Fitzgerald train, there's no stopping. You'll be hurtling
through this plot faster than you can say "T.J. Eckleburg." It seems to us that F. Scott Fitzgerald loves winding sentences
that begin with one idea, person, or location and end up somewhere else entirely. Because of this, he draws amazing
connections. In this example, watch how he begins with personality and ends with earthquakes:
If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some
heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register
earthquakes ten thousand miles away. (1.4)
How's that for some plate tectonics? Our speaker talks about the "unbroken series of successful gestures" that
characterizes personality, but we can't help but think of the series of successful words that live in this very sentence.
Unlike a personality, these words are broken up by three commas. We can't get enough of the commas and semi-colons
that live in The Great Gatsby; they are everywhere, and they make for some juicy, action-packed sentences. Sometimes,
we have to read sentences over and over again, just to make sure we actually did read the phrases "whole caravansary"
and "card house" in the same sentence (8.15).
These commas tell us that, while Fitzgerald may like beautifully ornate sentences, he also loves to enforce order. The
sentences may look like they're rambling, but there's always a map.
Whats Up With the Title?
For such a short title, The Great Gatsby raises a lot of questions. IsGatsby great? Or is Fitzgerald being ironic? And why
is he "the" great Gatsby? Let's break it down.
The way we see it, there are three ways to read the title. First, there's the surface level of Gatsby's persona. He's one of
the wealthiest people on Long Island, and definitely one of the wealthiest in West Egg. He's got a mansion loaded with
the nicest, most expensive stuff. And his parties... oh the parties. Any one of them would qualify as a legendary event in
itself, and he hosts at least one every weekend. He gives all of his guests first-class treatment, even though he doesn't
really know any of themdown to sending some rando girl a new dress after she tears hers at his party.
Gatsby is a local celebrity, and everyone has a theory about how he's gotten to be so wealthy. In short, everyone seems
to know his name and is endlessly interested in his life. So in that way, he's, well, "great." He seems to live a dream-like
existence; he even briefly wins back the girl of his dreams.
Isn't It Ironic
Then there's the ironic reading: Gatsby's dream-like life is a sham. He rises to the top of society in a dishonest way; he's
earned his fortune through illegal activities. The "old money" folks see right through his appearance. He's not "great" to
them he's a phony. And when his house of cards crumbles, all those friends of his turn out to simply be people who
take advantage of his generosity and riches.
Great Heart
But then there's a third way of looking at that adjective. Although Nick doesn't quite approve of Gatsby's means, he
knows that Gatsby's driven by a noble emotion: love. Also, Nick believes that Gatsby is truly a good person; the man is
generous, loyal, and sincere. In this way, Gatsby is great. He's a victim of Tom and Daisy's selfish, shallow addiction to
their wealth and lifestyle, and, in the end, Nick sides with him.
A Book by Any Other Name
The Great Gatsby wasn't Fitzgerald's first stab at a title. He came up with a whole list, including:
Gatsby
Gold-Hatted Gatsby
Trimalchio
So, did Fitzgerald make the right choice? How would our reading of the book change if he'd gone with one of these other
titles? And is Gatsby truly great?
The Great Gatsby Theme of Society and Class
America is a classless society. True or false? You'll have good support no matter which way you answer, but The Great
Gatsby has a pretty clear answer: no. There's no such thing as the American Dream or the up-from-the-bootstraps selfmade man. You are who you're born, and attempting to change classes just leads to tragedy. It's a pretty grim picture of
American societyand life, to those who lived through World War I, could feel pretty grim indeed.
The Great Gatsby Theme of Love
Only fools fall in love, and the biggest fool in The Great Gatsby is, well, Gatsby. Tom and Daisy may have some kind of
affection and loyalty for each other, but we're pretty sure it's not actually love. Jordan and Nick are happy enough to do
some summer lovin' together, but they're not exactly in it 4EVA. It's Gatsby who falls in love, but is he in love with Daisy,
or with a dream of Daisy, or with the idea of being in love? And does true love always come with destruction and
violence?