Sixties Slovak twentieth century culture are privileged position; in many ways,

which can be regarded as a pioneering and very fruitful and poetry. The number of
quality writers, authors and works that arose during this time, makes them subject
plethora examination of literary study, but given just as difficult to understand as a
whole. Two volumes of memoirs Andrey Boknkov Slovak poetry of the sixties of the
20th century (Comenius University in Bratislava, 2012), this segment Literary really
caught only with great empathy, which is a high rate of erudition, but also the
obligation of non -violent (not to say, organic - growing up directly from the basic
texts) systematization, the affected object, parallel and complementary, thus
offering live (in terms neustrnut in tough conditions) svojbytne comprehensive, yet
sufficiently open image poetry of this period. After the edict accurate and innovative
processing selection of poetry (and its reflection), Trnava and konkretist (two signs
choice consistent difference was published in 2006 titled Trnava group -.
Concretists), which includes deep wells editor, A. Boknkov their attention focused
the authors konkretist unconnected, unifying the various probes into poetics and
deepened their comments.
The first part carries the subtitle Memories studio portraits and reconstructions. The
first part is the center of attention received poetry Ondru J., J. Stach, M. Kovac, J.
Moko, J. Mihalkovi, L. Vadkerti Gavornkov and F. Andrak (mainly) in each
period. 1956 to r. 1973. The second part is devoted to higher notes formation, which
should not be primarily in the sixties, but poetry, which is characterized by the
position of consulting poetic working time (J. spruce, L. Novomesk, Rufus).
Definition of the reporting period based on the creation of periodization Trnava and
Concretists which the author said in the selection - 1956 is the year of entry in the
logbook J. Ondru in the literature and in the years 1972 to 1973 (in the monograph
only works with r. 1973) Boknkov deemed necessary, as published collection of
Paracelsus . Feldek and Stone and pitcher L. Vadkerti Gavornkov, as well as state
Mihalkovi J. will, intellect, heart. The room in which the author of this excellent
interpretation tuned moving memoir, however, is much broader. In order to identify
and explain what is happening in the poetry of the reporting period with respect to
the broader developmental movement in literature, the author not only creates an
inspiring model of the relationship between the formation studied authors and
writers, but also points to a positive discussion on Slovak and world poetry and
prose in the period before World War II (J. spruce, L. Novomesk, nadrealizmus, F.
vantner, FG Lorca et al.), and follows the individual characteristics of poetry
through the motif, shape, philosophical and other lines with high temporal and
spatial surveillance. It shows his vision of the nature of literary history, which in his
opinion there is nothing Stranger "as vtesnvanie processes in a linear sequence of
events, books and personality" (II, p. 116).