Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Paper
* Dr. A.K.Pandey
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123456789012345678901212
* Assicate
Prof. Comm.Dept.
Sant Gadge
Maharaj
Mahavidyalaya, Walgaom.
* Govt..
D. B. Girls
P.G. Auto. College
,Raipur
(Chhattisgarh)
59
International Research Journal , September 2010 ISSN- 0975-3486 RNI: RAJBIL 2009/30097 VOL I * ISSUE 12
60
fjlpZ
,ukfyfll
boSY ;q,ku
International Research Journal , September 2010 ISSN- 0975-3486 RNI: RAJBIL 2009/30097 VOL I * ISSUE 12
politics have today accepted it and are maturing into system and in their elected representatives. 5. Coalition
skilled and virtuoso performers at the game.
governments are definitely far less effective, not durable,
Problems of coalition governments
and non-dependable as compared to the governments
1. Coalition government is actually less democratic as formed by any one party with a definite ideology and
the balance of power is inevitably held by the small principles. 6. In coalition governments, MLAs and
parties who can barter their support for concessions MPs from all the parties are given portfolios / ministries
from the main groups within the coalition. This means and appointed as Ministers. These ministers are
that a party with little popular support is able to impose appointed on the recommendations of the parent party,
its policies upon the majority by a process of political without taking the qualification, character and criminal
blackmail. Possible examples of this might include the / clean record of the MLAs and MPs. 7. Many times
role of religious parties in Israel, the Greens in Germany it is found that the numbers of ministers are so very
and France, and the demand of constitutional reforms large that the leaders run out of portfolios to be given
by the Lib Dems in the UK as their price of coalition to the incumbents. That means there is no office existing
support in a future hung parliament. Democracy may be and some MLAs and MPs become ministers. We have
further undermined if the process of coalition-making even seen ministers without portfolios or minister with
is subject to the whim of a monarch or president, able some meaningless portfolios. Such ministers are asked
to decide who to ask to attempt to form a government, to run their office without portfolios from their
whether to call new elections, etc. 2. Coalition residences, with hardly any officials working under
government is less transparent. Because a party has no them. 8. This is a blatant misuse and waste of the
real chance of forming a government alone, the revenues collected out of the hard-earned money of the
manifestos they present to the public become irrelevant people of India. 9. I think coalition govt. cannot able
and often wildly unrealistic. Real decisions about to proper development of country because the
political programmes are made after the election, in a government hasnt power to take decision himself.
process of secretive back-room negotiation from which If you turn the pages of Indian History after
the public is excluded. 3. Coalitions provide bad Independence, we can clearly see that most of the time
government because they are unable to take a long- coalition government failed to give the good governance
term view. Sometimes an ideological compass is to the people of India. We can take the example as
follows: 1.Janta Dal government at centre in 1989 2.
necessaryANALYSIS
for governments to navigate
in difficult
RESEARCH
AND
EVALUATION
political and economic waters, and coalitions lack such Previous state government in Karnataka (Congress
a unifying philosophy. In addition planning for the Janta Dal alliance) 3. BJP lead alliance headed by A.B.
long-term often requires decisions to be made that are Bajpayee had not smooth run 4. Last government
unpopular in the short-term. Coalitions often fail such alliance in U.P. before Mayavati government
Conclusion: - I conclude that since India is
tests because temporary unpopularity may encourage
one of the parties involved to defect, in search of a a diverse country with different ethnic, linguistic, and
populist advantage. It might be agreed that sometimes religious communities, it also has diverse ideologies.
exceptional circumstances, such as war, require a Due to this, the benefit that a coalition has is that it leads
coalition government (although the USA did not have to more consensus based politics and reflects the
one in either World War). This does not mean that such popular opinion of the electorate. In order to have stable
governments are better in normal conditions. Major coalitions, it is necessary that political parties moderate
constitutional decisions are better dealt with through their ideologies and programmes. They should be more
referendum 4. Coalition governments are very unstable, open to take others point of view as well. They must
often collapsing and reforming at frequent intervals accommodate each others interests and concerns. In
Italy, for example, averages more than one government India, parties do not always agree on the correct path
per year since 1945.In India all non-Congress coalitions for government policy. Different parties have different
except last bajpayees ministry didnt completed its full interests and beliefs and it is difficult to sustain a
term and the first Bajpayee ministry lasted for only consensus on issues when disagreement arises.
thirteen days. This greatly restricts the ability of However, this is not to say that we have never had
governments to deal with major reforms and means that successful coalitions. Governments in W. Bengal,
politicians seldom stay in any particular ministerial post Kerala, N.D.A. last ministry as well as present U.P.A.
for long enough to get to grips with its demands. At the Government led by Congress at centre have been
same time, this squabbling between political parties successful coalition.
erodes the confidence of the public in their political
Context
61