Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Closing Date:
Closing Time:
Reference:
Subject:
preparation and submission of applications. Further, USAID reserves the right to reject any or all
applications received.
Sincerely,
//s//
Stephanie E. Fugate
USAID Contracting and Agreement Officer
Office of Acquisition & Assistance
M/OAA/SIDP/B, Special Initiatives and Development Partners
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and Acronyms5
Commonly Used Terms and Definitions...6
SECTION I. FUNDING DESCRIPTION.13
A.
B.
Program Description.........................................................................................................13
B.1 Background14
B.2
C.
C.1
C.2
C.3
C.4
Acceleration Support19
Authorizing Legislation...22
B.
C.
C.1
Award....22
C.2
C.3
C.4
Award Administration...23
C.5
C.6
Funding Information..23
C.7
Period of Performance...23
C.8
Award Budgets..23
B.
C.
D.
A.
Points of Contact27
B.
B.1
B.2
Indication of Non-Disclosure.28
B.3
B.4
B.5
B.6
Supporting Documentation..32
B.7
Eligibility Screening.35
B.
C.
Additional Requirements.39
B.
Substantial Involvement...39
C.
D.
Intellectual Property..39
E.
F.
G.
H.
Reporting Requirements...42
B.
Acquisition Award
Agribusiness
Agricultural Value
Chain
Agreement Officer
(AO)
Agreement
Officers
Representative
(AOR)
The USAID representative who performs functions that are designated by the
Agreement Officer, or is specifically designated by policy or regulation as part
of the administration of an Assistance Award (grant or cooperative agreement).
Source: ADS 300
All terms sourced as Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) can be found online at USAID Policy website:
http://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/agency-policy
2
All terms sourced as Automated Directives System (ADS) can be found online in the Glossary of ADS Terms located
at: http://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/agency-policy/glossary-ads-terms
Apparently
Successful
Applicant(s)
The Applicant(s) for USAID funding recommended for an award after technical
evaluation, but who has not yet been awarded a grant, cooperative agreement,
contract or other Assistance/Acquisition Award by the Agreement/Contract
Officer. Apparently successful applicant status confers no right and constitutes
no USAID commitment to an award, which still must be obligated by the
Agreement Officer.
Source: ADS 303; 22 CFR 226.91 3
Applicant
Assistance Award
Award
Awardee
Broad Agency
Announcement
(BAA)
Business Model
Clean Energy
All terms sourced as Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) can be found online at: http://www.usaid.gov/who-weare/agency-policy/external-reference-links/cfr
Clean Energy
Services
The range of products and services that are derived from/associated with the
clean energy sector, including manufacturing, importing, distribution, servicing
and financing.
Clean Energy
Service Provider /
Clean Energy
Enterprise
Clean Energy
Solution
Collaboration
Agreement/ Public
Private Alliance
Contract
Contractor
Contracting Officer
(CO)
A person with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts
and make related determinations and findings. The term includes certain
authorized representatives of the Contracting Officer acting within the limits of
their authority as delegated by the Contracting Officer. A single Contracting
Officer may be responsible for duties in any or all of these areas.
Source FAR 2.101
Contracting
Officers
Representative
(COR)
Cooperative
Agreement
The USAID representative who performs functions which are designated by the
Contracting Officer, or are specifically designated by policy or regulation as
part of contract administration.
Source: ADS 300
A legal instrument used where the principal purpose is the transfer of money,
property, services or anything of value to the recipient in order to accomplish a
public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by Federal statute and
where substantial involvement by USAID is anticipated.
Source: ADS 300
Documented mobilization/leveraging of non-USAID resources from the
recipient, and/or partner organization(s), private firms and institutions to
complement implementation of PAEGC activities at the country level. CostSharing may be demonstrated either through direct funding, beneficiary
contributions, in-kind assistance, or a combination thereof. Cost-Share
contributions may come from internal and/or external sources.
Cost-Share
Developing
Country/Advanced
Developing Country
As of the date of this BAA based on the Appropriations Act, USAID is prohibited from directly financing any assistance
or reparations for the governments of Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Syria. Please refer to Automated Directive System
(ADS) 310 entitled Source and Nationality Requirements for Procurement of Commodities and Services Financed by
USAID.
Energy Efficiency
A method, technology, and/or strategy for managing and restraining the growth
in energy consumption of appliances, buildings, as well as end-use applications
such as cooking or lighting.
FedBizOpps
The USG Federal website that posts all Federal procurement opportunities with
a value over $25,000. (www.fbo.gov)
Finalist
Food Security
Food security is a situation that exists when all people, at all times, have
physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that
meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
Founding Partner
Funding Window
Grant
Public and Private Sector entities that contribute financial and in-kind resources
to support PAEGC. At the time of this solicitation, the PAEGC Founding
Partners are: United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the
Government of Sweden, Duke Energy Corporation, the Government of
Germany, and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).
A legal instrument used where the principal purpose is the transfer of money,
property, services or anything of value to the recipient in order to accomplish a
public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by USG Federal statute and
where substantial involvement by USAID is not anticipated.
Source: ADS 300
Grants.gov
10
Innovation/
Innovative
Innovator
Innovator
Evaluation Board
Intervention
Market Driven
Offer
Online Application
Platform
The online application platform defines the website that all Applicants will use
to submit an application to the Powering Agriculture solicitation
(www.PoweringAg.org/apply)
Scaling
Semi-Finalist
11
Solicitation
Statement of Work
Term used by the US Government to refer to the assorted means by which offers
or proposals are sought for government requirements and programs. Broad
Agency Announcements (BAAs), Requests for Proposals (RFPs), Invitations for
Bids (IFBs), Tenders, Requests for Applications (RFAs), Annual Program
Statements (APSs), and Requests for Quotes (RFQs) are all examples of types
of US Government solicitations.
Source: ADS 221
Also referred to as a work statement. A document that defines service contract
requirements in clear, concise language identifying specific work to be
accomplished. It must be individually tailored to consider the period of
performance, deliverable items, if any, and the desired degree of performance.
In the case of task order contracts, the statement of work for the basic contract
need only define the scope of the overall contract. Individual task orders must
define specific task requirements.
Source: FAR 37.602-1
Target Area of
Operation
Technical
Evaluation
Committee (TEC)
The target area of operation defines the primary geographic location and/or
market for project implementation and impact.
A collection of a technical evaluators that preform an analysis of each
offerors proposal with respect to the standards and criteria established in the
source selection plan, and as set forth in the solicitation
Source: ADS 300; 48 CFR 715.303-70
12
In the context of this solicitation, the term clean energy refers to usable energy (i.e. electricity, illumination,
heating/refrigeration, mechanization) that is derived from renewable sources and supports a reduction in fossil fuel use,
increase in efficiency, and/or limitation of greenhouse gas emissions. Clean energy sources include solar, hydro, wind,
geothermal, sustainably harvested biomass, and biogas. The term clean energy solution refers to the combination of
appropriate technology and business model that addresses the clean energy demands of a select market. This is
synonymous with the term innovation
6
PAEGC is the third in a series of six Grand Challenges for Development that USAID initiated with international
partners. The previous two Grand Challenges respectively focus on maternal and newborn health and early-age literacy:
(i) Saving Lives at Birth; and (ii) All Children Reading. The final three Grand Challenges focus on citizen
engagement & government responsiveness, addressing Ebola, and the water-food value chain respectively: (iii) Making
All Voices Count, Fighting Ebola, and Securing Water for Food. Further information about these initiatives can be
found online at: www.savinglivesatbirth.net , www.allchildrenreading.org , http://www.makingallvoicescount.org/,
http://www.ebolagrandchallenge.net/ and http://www.securingwaterforfood.org/.
13
otherwise not receive support through traditional international development programs. Importantly,
the model supports solutions with the potential to achieve scale in low resource settings by, among
other things, leveraging investment and financing.
B.1 Background
Historically and globally, agricultural intensification has been largely accompanied with the
increased use of energy inputs - particularly petroleum based products for electricity generation and
liquid fuel - to produce, process, and distribute agricultural products. In getting food from the farm
to the table, there are a number of energy intensive activities within agricultural value chains
including, but not limited to: (i) Pumping water and irrigating crops, (ii) On-farm mechanization,
(iii) Value-added processing, (iv) Refrigerated storage and transformation processes, and (v)
Transporting agricultural goods from the farm/market to end-consumers.
Due to the close relationship [that] exists between rising energy prices and the costs of agricultural
production, 7,8 the price volatility of energy services can adversely affect food insecure populations
- particularly those located in emerging economies and developing countries. There is a growing
concern that if the inexpensive supply of fossil fuels becomes unavailable in the future, options for
increasing food productivity may become severely limited. 9 Figure 1 shows the co-movement
between food prices and energy prices over time. 10,11
Figure 1: Food and Energy Prices over Time
14
By 2050, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) projects that an increase in
70 percent of 2005-2007 food production levels will be needed to meet the demand of a growing
world population expected to reach 9.6 billion people. 12,13 If left unchecked, and if current trends
continue, this significant agricultural intensification will result in an even greater demand for fossil
fuels worldwide. Such a path could contribute to greater food insecurity, and prominent increase in
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the agricultural sector 14.
While there is a growing recognition of challenges associated with energy intensive agriculture
operations, efforts made to date to address interrelated concerns of water usage, food
production/processing, and energy consumption have been rather fragmented and mono-sectoral in
focus. This isolated, siloed approach has resulted in a lack of coordination, and inconsistencies
between laws and regulatory frameworks within both sectors, 15 which may delay global efforts to
sustainably support climate-resilient agricultural intensification. However, the adoption of a
nexus approach that concurrently focuses on both sectors could enable better collaboration and
coordination among the numerous countries/donors that dedicate resources to energy and
agriculture programs. 16,17,18 A combined clean energy/agriculture approach could help maximize
the impact of finite energy resources to: (i) Increase farmers and agribusiness use of clean energy
technologies, (ii) Improve on-farm/agriculture processing energy efficiency, (iii) Introduce new
income generating opportunities in developing countries, (iv) Reduce food insecurity in vulnerable
regions, and (iv) Mitigate adverse climate change effects that stem from the agriculture sector.
PAEGC seeks to address the aforementioned concerns by supporting innovation within the
energy/agriculture nexus in emerging markets and developing countries where many farmers and
agribusinesses lack access to reliable, affordable, and clean energy services. As such, these farmers
and agribusinesses are less able to adopt sustainable agricultural techniques to increasing crop
yields, engage in opportunities for value-added processing, and benefit from broad-based,
environmentally-sound economic growth.
B.2 Cross-cutting Critical Barriers
In the context of the energy/agriculture nexus, PAEGC has identified four broad categories of
barriers that hinder the adoption and use of clean energy technologies within the agriculture sectors
of developing countries.
Limited Demand: In many locations, farmers and agribusinesses are not aware of
clean energy technologies that may assist them in enhancing the productivity, profitability,
and/or efficiencies of their operations. Though awareness is a necessary condition for
demand, prospective adoptees must also note clear, verified benefits to switching from longstanding agriculture practices to new methods/technologies.
12
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2009). How to Feed the World by 2050. United
Nations.
13
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2013). World Population Prospects: The
2012 Revision (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Documentation/publications.htm)
14
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). Energy-Smart Food for People and Climate:
Issue Paper. United Nations.
15
United Nations World Water Assessment Programme. (2014). World Water Development Report 2014 Volume 1.
16
Scott, et.al. (2011). Policy and institutional dimensions of the waterenergy nexus. Energy Policy. (39). Pg. 6622
6630
17
Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and
Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm
18
United Nations. (2013). The Status of the Water-Food-Energy Nexus in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social
Commission for Asia and the Pacific
15
Inappropriate Technology Design/Cost: Often, technologies that are readily
used in modern agriculture operations do not match the performance characteristics and/or
price points required in emerging markets. Technologies need to be appropriate for local
operating conditions and also affordable for the target users.
Limited Access to Financing: The problems of risk and design are compounded
by lack of access to affordable credit to distributors of clean energy products and services
who then in turn cannot provide or direct customers to end user financing. Banks and other
financial institutions which may already skeptical about lending to farmers and
agribusinesses - are unfamiliar with clean energy products and services that frequently have
relatively high initial capital costs.
PAEGC is looking for innovative CESs that involve comprehensive approaches to overcoming one
or more of these aforementioned barriers that exist in the agriculture sectors emerging markets.
C. PAEGC Global Innovation Call
PAEGCs second Global Innovation Call is designed to source innovative technologies/business
models applicable to the clean energy/agriculture nexus. 19 Through this BAA, PAEGC is seeking
innovative approaches to effectively integrate new CESs within the agriculture sectors of
developing countries and emerging markets. PAEGC is agnostic in regards to the specific clean
energy technologies, target geographic locations, and target agriculture value chains proposed by
Applicants. However, all CESs proposed must demonstrate a prominent clean energy component,
prominent agriculture component, and a viable business model with an identified target market in a
developing country(ies).
Through this BAA, PAEGC anticipates disbursing up to $20 million USD in awards. Individual
awards are expected to range is from $500,000 to $2,000,000 USD. This range in award size is
reflective of an understanding that the financial and non-financial needs of prospective Applicants
will vary greatly according to the nature of their proposed activities, and the current state of
development of the solutions they are proposing to pursue. The actual value of individual awards
will be dependent on the need for financing, and the nature of the proposed activities. It is expected
that between 10 and 20 individual awards will be issued through this BAA.
C.1
Descriptions of the projects that PAEGC selected for funding through the first Global Innovation Call can be found at:
http://www.poweringag.org/2013-winners
16
channels resources through two separate Funding Windows tailored to support a portfolio of CES at
both: (i) the early stages of research and design; and (ii) at the later stage of product/business model
development to assist Clean Energy Solutions expand to commercial scale and/or replicate
successfully piloted solutions elsewhere.
This Funding Window is for new clean energy technologies and business models that show
promise of being viable in supporting the objective of PAEGC, but have yet to demonstrate
their proven applicability in a developing country context through extensive field tests.
These Clean Energy Solutions, may be at the early stages of research and development
(R&D), and could benefit from PAEGC funding to refine/improve the design of the
technologies, establish proof of concept, pilot field tests, and adapt technologies/business
models for a new markets. All awards made through this Funding Window for early stage
development of Clean Energy Solutions will be up to $500,000 USD. All Applicants that
receive awards through this Funding Window are encouraged to demonstrate a Cost-Share
contribution of at least 15 percent (up to 75,000) of the total award value. 20
This Funding Window is intended to support clean energy technologies and business models
that have been successfully piloted in a developing country/emerging market on a small
scale, and are now ready for market expansion and scaling-up. Funding Window 2
Applicants are those that have already demonstrated a viable technology and business
model, and are generating revenue in an existing market. It is expected that these solutions
will have already demonstrated technical feasibility and market acceptance, and that
Applicants will be able to provide evidence supporting these accomplishments.
These Applicants may seek PAEGC funding for commercial activities, including but not
limited to: adaptation of the innovation for larger scale production, market adoption, and
distribution. Awards made through this Funding Window will be between $500,000 USD
and $2,000,000 USD. The actual value of individual awards will be dependent on the need
for financing, and the nature of the proposed activities. All Applicants that receive awards
through this Funding Window shall demonstrate a 35 percent Cost-Share contribution.
Through this BAA, Applicants will apply for either Window 1 or Window 2 funding. Those
applications for Window 1 funding will only be evaluated against other Window 1 applications.
Likewise, Window 2 applications will be evaluated only against other Window 2 applications
PAEGC does not have a pre-determined ratio regarding the number of projects/amount of
funds/types of technology applications that will be channeled through the two Windows. However,
Applicants shall note that PAEGC is interested in funding a diverse portfolio, comprising CES that
are in various stages of development across different types of technology applications and business
models.
PAEGC shall be regarded by prospective Applicants as just one source of funding for a potential
project. Applicants shall not expect to have their entire project financed by PAEGC, nor shall they
drop components of a viable project design just because they are not funded by PAEGC. It is likely
that PAEGC funding will finance only a portion of a larger project design, in which case Applicants
20
Further discussion about what constitutes internal and external contributions in the context of this solicitation is
provided in Section III.
17
shall look to other sources of financing/technical assistance to raise the total amount of capital
needed. These other sources of financing/technical assistance will be supported through the
Applicants Cost-Share contributions to the projects. PAEGC awards are intended to help de-risk
projects to help them achieve more commercially acceptable levels of risk and returns and to
technically pilot/fine tune new promising CESs. PAEGC funding is meant to finance early stages of
projects that are difficult to finance commercially, with the intention to assist those Awardees reach
a project development phase that is easier to access conventional sources financing.
C.2
Regardless of what Funding Window individual Applicants are interested, PAEGC expects the
following features to be reflected in all competitive applications for funding.
Applicants must be able to describe how their Clean Energy Solution will have an impact on
both increasing use of clean energy/increasing energy efficiency & on increasing agriculture
production and/or value. All Applicants must have a clear plan on how they intend to
monitor/measure the impact(s) of their CES.
Many renewable energy/energy efficiency technologies that exist worldwide are not
accessible/known to farmers/agribusinesses in developing countries. PAEGC is looking to
support CES that are truly market-driven; Applicants must describe the specific developing
country agricultural market they are targeting, and articulate how their solutions meet an
existing market demand on the ground. Applicants must also describe how small-scale
farmers and small to medium scale enterprises (SMEs)/operators along the agricultural value
chain benefit from the proposed measures.
Applicants must be able to describe how their Clean Energy Solution/innovation supports
low emissions economic growth and development amongst target end user groups. The
applications must describe in what manner the adoption of their proposed CES will
contribute to indicators that PAEGC uses to monitor the results of global climate change
mitigation/adaptation efforts GHG emission reduction, increased investment in climate
change mitigation/adaptation activities, clean energy generation, and/or energy efficiency.
Applicants must be able to show how their CES will contribute to reducing gender
disparities in access to, control over and benefit from clean energy resources, wealth,
opportunities and services: economic, social, political, and cultural. In this regard,
Applicants must familiarize themselves with USAIDs Gender Equality and Female
Empowerment Policy 21
Applicants must have a presence in the country(ies) in which they propose to work or at
21
USAIDs Gender Equality and Female Empowerment Policy can be found at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pdact200.pdf
18
least one local partner in the country(ies). Prior developing country experience with the
proposed clean energy solutions and/or agricultural segment chosen and/or
delivery/distribution/financing models is preferred, including in the chosen country(ies).
We also encourage applicants to develop market-driven partnerships that can help clean
energy solutions/innovations achieve economies of scale.
Applicants must communicate in what way that PAEGC grant funding will be integrated
into an established business plan. Regardless of the their proposed CES development stage,
Applicants must demonstrate why grant funding as opposed to other sources of financing
is the most effective means to fill an identified funding gap in their business model. Rather
than regarding grant funding as free money, it shall be regarded as resource that will assist
the Applicant in further developing its CES so that it is better positioned to attract other
sources of financing after the PAEGC grant funding has expired.
C.3
It is important for Applicants to note that there are certain types of activities that are not eligible for
funding through this PAEGC solicitation. These include:
Project ideas that are managed from or include activities to be implemented in ineligible
countries 22
Approaches that reinforce harmful gender norms;
Approaches that reinforce harmful environmental or social practices;
Activities focused on research and development for a product without a clearly defined
market demand or credible commercialization prospects;
One-off renewable energy installations or pilot projects to support proven technologies for
proven applications - unless they include an innovative component(s) that clearly outline
realistic potential for replication and/or ability to achieve commercial scale;
Projects that are based solely on fossil fuel-based generation technologies. Please note:
Hybrid technologies that couple fossil fuel-based power generation with clean energy
generation are acceptable;
Projects focused on increase in utilization of mechanized agriculture utilizing fossil fuelbased technologies
Projects that jeopardize the resiliency of agricultural practices or sustainable supply chains;
and
While it is understood that policy and trade reforms are often critical for technology
development/deployment and for increasing energy access, such issues are better addressed
through more conventional international development programs and/or bi-/multi-lateral
and/or para-statal negotiations. Thus, proposed remedial interventions of this nature will not
be eligible for funding.
C.4
Acceleration Support
After award, a third party/ies funded by the Founding Partners will offer limited acceleration
support in the form of online training and group skills development to all Finalists (those invited
for face-to-face interviews). More in-depth acceleration support from this third party/ies will be
offered to Awardees only. The level of support provided to awardees will be optional and will
depend on the needs and stage of the Awardee. This support may include advisory services,
22
19
technical services, and partnership facilitation. Supply side interventions may include: improving
the innovation, capacity building of the management team, improving distribution models, gaining
operational efficiency, and expanding access to capital to finance the growth strategy. Demandside interventions may include: improving market linkages, securing contracts, building
partnerships, enabling penetration of new markets, and support in attracting a growing customer
base. If Finalists/awardees are not interested in receiving accelerator support through PAEGC,
then they will not be required to participate.
Awardees will have the option to work with an Acceleration Facilitator to create a work-plan that
identifies relevant and specific services from the acceleration support program. These services
should directly complement the innovators ability to reach technical and financial milestones.
The Acceleration Facilitator will either be a USAID staff member with a background in marketdriven sustainable development from one of the Founding Partners, or a representative of an
outside incubator or accelerator.
While all acceleration support will be needs-based and tailored to the innovator, we anticipate that
the third party/ies will offer three broad sub-programs, described below. Services under each of
the sub- programs will, ideally, be provided by existing and proven accelerators, incubators,
industry experts, and recognized business development service providers. If there are specific
services that an innovator requires that are outside of these sub-programs, we will do our utmost
to provide them.
The three sub-programs are envisioned to include:
a. Biz-Tech Development Services: The Acceleration Facilitator may provide access to
prequalified firms and consultants who can provide the services identified in the
innovators acceleration work-plan. These services may include access to technology and
engineering, pricing, human resource management, marketing, IT, legal, procurement,
supply chain, manufacturing, and distribution experts and business model innovation
advisory services.
b. Investment Facilitation:
Investment-preparedness workshops. The Acceleration Facilitator may help prepare
innovators to successfully attract capital partners. Innovators may participate in
investment workshops with successful entrepreneurs, investors, other capital
providers, and lawyers to help them analyze their growth strategy and determine
capital requirements. In addition, the workshops will help innovators develop their
pitches and prepare for questions from potential investors.
20
Investors circles. The Acceleration Facilitator may help bring together investors and
select innovators for structured pitch presentations. Grant, debt and equity capital
providers will be invited, depending on the needs of the innovators. Additionally, s/he
may invite relevant corporations to catalyze product development, licensing
agreements, mergers, acquisitions, etc., as appropriate.
Deal management. The Acceleration Facilitator may integrate feedback from the
investors circles into the acceleration work plan and support the innovators to address
identified challenges and prepare for future rounds of investment pitches. The
Acceleration Facilitator may also track potential interest from the investors and
support the innovators to respond and follow-up during diligence and negotiation
process.
21
Sales and business development. The Acceleration Facilitator may provide access to
advisors and build capacity around sales and new business development.
Partnership development. The Acceleration Facilitator may work with awardees, and
prequalified firms and consultants to support the creation of partnerships with
manufacturers, distributors and other B2B partners, donors, civil society
organizations, local governments, etc. to facilitate uptake of the innovation and
thereby growth of the business
Representative (C/AOR) will serve as the primary technical contact between USAID and the
recipient of the Award.
C.4
Award Administration: Award administration will be determined at time of award based
on the mechanism chosen by the CO/AO.
C.5
Program Profit and Income: Applicants seeking information about program profit and
program income or other issues regarding USAIDs administration of assistance awards shall
consult 22 CFR 226 and for acquisition awards shall consult the FAR and AIDAR for applicable
regulations.
C.6
Funding Information: Funds may be provided in increments subject to availability of
funds, successful implementation and continued relevance to USAID. USAIDs obligation to make
awards is contingent upon the availability of sufficient appropriated and partner funds from which
payment can be made and the receipt of proposals that USAID determines are acceptable for Award
under this BAA.
C.7
Period of Performance: The period of performance for new Awards for proposals
submitted in response to this BAA is up to three years from date of Award. Any period of
performance must be justified in the proposal.
C.8
Award Budgets: The estimated ceiling for this BAA is $10-20 Million USD. Subject to
the availability of funds, the individual Award(s) will range from $500,000- $2,000,000. Further
information about factors that will determine the funding level of individual awards is provided in
Section III. It is anticipated that 10 20 proposals will be funded.
[END SECTION II]
23
As of the date of this BAA based on the Appropriations Act, USAID is prohibited from directly financing any
assistance or reparations for the governments of Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Syria. Please refer to Automated Directive
System (ADS) 310 entitled Source and Nationality Requirements for Procurement of Commodities and Services
Financed by USAID.
24
contributions could include the value of salaries for staff, goods, and/or services that the Applicant
will donate to the project, or self- investment in project activities. Examples of external
contributions include the value of time donated by technical or business experts and technology,
communications, or fixed capital assets as well as private equity/debt investments, an advance
purchase order, a share of royalties, rights in the technology, a percentage of profit, or any other
similar combination thereof. Resource-sharing from non-US publically-funded programs could also
qualify. However, resources from another US Federal Government program may not be
counted towards a Cost-Share contribution. In the Full Proposal stage of the evaluation process,
Applicants will be asked to describe the nature of their Cost-Share, and the manner in which that
contribution has been monetized and can be verified.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to refer to ADS Chapter 303 24 and 22 CFR 226.23 25 to review
the standards and criteria that must be met in order for resources to be considered by USAID as
Cost-Share contributions. USAID does not apply its source and nationality requirements or the
restricted goods provision established in the Standard Provision "USAID Eligibility Rules for
Commodities and Services" to Cost-Share contributions. Table 2 summarizes the Cost-Share
requirements for the two Funding Windows.
Table 2: PAEGC Funding Window Award Value and Cost-Share
Funding Window
Window 1 Clean Energy
Solution - Design
Window 2 Clean Energy
Solution ScaleUp/Commercial Growth
Award Value
Cost-Share
Up to $500,000
$500,000 $2,000,000
For the first stage of the selection process, PAEGC invites Applicants from any eligible country to
submit through the OAP basic information about their organization, and a 600-word Concept Note
that succinctly describes their CES, and why it is appropriate from PAEGC Funding. All applicants
are asked to respond to two questions that relate to: (i) Innovation; and (ii) Relevance to Clean
Energy/Agriculture Nexus. Funding Window 1 Applicants are asked to respond to an additional
24
Content related to Cost-Share contributions in ADS Chapter 303 can be found at:
http://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1868/303.pdf
25
Content related to Cost-Share contributions in 22 CFR 226.23 can be found at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR2011-title22-vol1/xml/CFR-2011-title22-vol1-part226.xml#seqnum226.23
25
third question that relates to: (iii.a) Market Potential. Funding Window 2 Applications are asked to
respond to an additional third question that relates to (iii.b) Potential to Scale. For each individual
question, the response is limited to 200 words. The responses to these three questions will
comprise the Concept Notes of the Applicants, and will be reviewed by the Stage 1 Technical
Evaluation Committee (TEC) 26 against a standard set of criteria, and given a score. The Stage 1
evaluation criteria and the weighting methodology that will be applied - are presented in Section
V of this BAA.
Following evaluation of the Concept Notes, PAEGC will invite those Applicants that received the
highest scores (the Semi-Finalists) to submit a 10 page Full Proposal and associated supporting
documentation. Similar to the Concept Note stage, all Full Proposals will be evaluated against a
standard set of criteria, and given a score. At this stage in the selection process, Semi-Finalist
Applicants will also be asked to submit: (i) An illustrative budget, outlining their expected
expenditures throughout the performance of the award - as well as the internal/external sources of
their Cost-Share contributions; (ii) Letters of commitment from any partners in their consortia; (iii)
Resumes/CVs of their proposed key personnel; and (iv) Past Performance Reference sheets that
outline their experience to date managing projects with a relevant focus. The Stage 2 TEC will
review the Full Proposals against a standard set of evaluation criteria, and give each a score. The
Stage 2 evaluation criteria and the weighting methodology that will be applied - are presented in
Section V of this BAA.
PAEGC will invite those Applicants whose Full Proposals received the highest scores (the
Finalists) to present their CES to an Innovator Evaluation Board (IEB) - a panel of technical
experts, business specialists, sustainable development experts, and researchers experienced in clean
energy and agriculture technology. Prior to delivering their presentations, the IEB may contact the
Finalists to ask them to provide further clarification about certain aspects of their proposed
activities and implementation plans, The presentations to the IEB will either be conducted through
in-person or video teleconferences (VTC) interviews. Through this process, PAEGC will determine
which Applicants will receive funding through this BAA.
D. Application Submission and Review Schedule
At the release of this BAA, it is expected that the application submission and review schedule will
proceed as follows:
December 1, 2014:
Deadline for submitting questions regarding the BAA
February 12 , 2015: Deadline for Applicants to submit PAEGC Concept Notes
September 2015:
PAEGC Awards are issued to top Finalist Applicants
Dates presented above are subject to change. If there are any changes to this schedule, all
Applicants/potential Applicants will be informed through an amendment to this BAA published
on www.FedBizOps,gov, www.grants.gov, and the PAEGC website www.PoweringAg.Org.
[END SECTION III]
26
It is anticipated that the composition of the TEC and IEB will include members from USAID, SIDA, GIZ, OPIC, Duke
Energy, technical experts, business specialists, sustainable development experts, and researchers. Technical and business
specialists may include individuals under contract to the Powering Agriculture Support Task Order implemented by Tetra
Tech. All TEC and IEB members are required to sign non-disclosure agreements.
26
B.1
Upon first visiting the OAP, the Applicant will be asked to create an account. On this initial page,
the Applicant will be asked to provide a: (i) Full Name and Position Title; (ii) Username; (iii)
Password (selected by Applicant); and (iv) E-mail address. The Applicant will subsequently receive
an e-mail and asked to activate the account and login using the Username and Password they
provided. Once they have created an account, Applicants will be able to submit more than one
application on behalf of the organization(s) that they represent.
B.2
Indication of Non-Disclosure
Upon first logging in to the OAP, and prior to submitting any information about their organization
or proposed CES, the Applicant will be asked to agree to a statement of non-disclosure. Applicants
that include data/information in their applications that they do not want disclosed to the public for
any purpose or used by the USG except for this solicitations evaluation purpose, shall indicate so
through the OAP, and mark as instructed the box that references the following text:
This application includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the U.S. Government and shall
not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate
this application. If, however, a grant is awarded to this Applicant as a result of or in connection
with the submission of this data, the U.S. Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or
disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting grant. This restriction does not limit the U.S.
Governments right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source
without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets and, mark each sheet
of data it wished to restrict with the following legend: Use or disclosure of data contained on this
sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this application.
B.3
Applicants are asked to submit the following information about their organization and the CES for
which they are seeking PAEGC funding. This information will be submitted to the OAP through a
combination of drop-down menus and text input fields.
a.
Name and full address of Applicant - including country where Applicant is incorporated or
registered.
b.
c.
Point of Contact information (name, position title, phone number, fax number, e-mail
address) of individual preparing application.
d.
Names of other organizations/firms that are partnering organizations in the proposal. Where
joint partnerships include innovators from developing countries, we encourage the
partnership to designate the developing country partner as the primary Applicant.
e.
Size of organization in terms of employed staff (for partnerships and consortia, list the
combined total staff).
f.
g.
28
h.
Specific agricultural value chain(s) and point in value chain where the proposed Clean
Energy Solution will be integrated. These value chains may include, but are not limited to:
staple crops, horticulture dairy, meat, aquaculture, agro-forestry products, etc.
i.
Broad category of technology chosen for the proposed Clean Energy Solution which
could include one or more of the following: solar, wind, biomass, waste, hydro,
geothermal, tidal, and energy efficiency.
j.
Funding Window being applied (Window 1: Clean Energy Solution Design; Window 2:
Clean Energy Solution - Scale-Up/Commercial Growth).
B.4
The Concept Notes submitted by the Applicants will consist of responses that they provide to
standard questions that are presented in the OAP. Both Window 1 and Window 2 Applicants that
are asked to provide 200-word responses to two standard questions that relate to: (i) Innovation;
and (ii) Relevance to Clean Energy/Agriculture Nexus.
Applicants that are applying for Window 1 funding are asked to provide a 200-word response to a
third question that relates to: (iii.a) Market Potential. Applicants that are applying for Window 2
funding are asked to provide a 200-word response to a third question that relates to (iii.b) Potential
for Scale. All responses are to be entered into using text input fields that are embedded in the OAP.
For Window 1 Applicants, the response to the Innovation Question will be scored on a scale from
0 10, and the responses to the Relevance to Clean Energy/Agriculture Nexus Question and
Market Potential Question will be scored on a scale of 0- 5 each. The highest possible score
Window 1 Applicants can receive is 20.
For Window 2 Applicants, the response to the Potential for Scale Question will be scored on a
scale from 0 10, and the responses to the Innovation Question and the Relevance to Clean
Energy/Agriculture Nexus Question will be scored on a scale of 0- 5 each. The highest possible
score Window 2 Applicants can receive is 20.
All of the Window 1 Concept Notes will only be evaluated against other Window 1 Concept Notes.
All of the Window 2 Concept Notes will only be evaluated against other Window 2 Concept Notes.
The evaluation criteria that will be used to score the responses received are included in Section V.
Innovation Question: What is your proposed Clean Energy Solution and how it is
remarkably different from currently available technologies, applications of
technologies, business models, and/or practices? (200 words)
(10 points for Window 1 Applicants; 5 points for Window 2 Applicants)
Only Funding Window 1 Applicants are asked to provide a response to the following third
question:
29
Market Potential Question: What is your target market(s) for the proposed Clean
Energy Solution and how will PAEGC resources be used to support the distribution,
Potential for Scale Question: In what manner will you be able to leverage PAEGC
resources to bring your Clean Energy Solution to a significantly expanded scale?
(200 words) (10 points for Window 2 Applicants)
Every Concept Note received will be independently reviewed by at least three Evaluators. The
Evaluators will give a numerical score for each response. The average of the total scores given by
each Evaluator will account for the score of the Applicants Concept Note.
B.5
Those Applicants whose Concept Notes received the highest scores will be invited to submit a Full
Proposal and supporting documents through the OAP. The Full Proposal is meant to provide
evaluators with in-depth information about the Applicants CES and their implementation plan.
Every Applicant regardless of Funding Window being pursued will upload a 10-page Full
Proposal in PDF format that does not exceed ten MB in size.
The Full Proposals will be evaluated against the following criteria: (i) Innovation and Relevance;
(ii) Project Design/Technical Approach; (iii) Business/Financial Viability; and (iv) Operational
Capacity. All Applicants are required to use these criteria as section headings in their Full
Proposals. For both Window 1 and Window 2 Applicants, all evaluation criteria are weighted
equally. Each evaluation criteria is worth a total of 5 points and will be scored on a scale of 0- 5
each. The highest score a Full Proposal can receive is 20 points. It is up to the individual
Applicant to determine how many words/pages they would like to allocate in the Full Proposal to
each evaluation criteria/section heading. Applicants may include charts/images/schematics in their
Full Proposal, but they are to be included within the 10 page limit. Cover pages are not necessary.
Applicants need not include CVs/resumes of key personnel or budget information as part of the 10
pages these will be uploaded/entered separately as supporting documents. The evaluation criteria
that will be used to score the Full Proposals are described in Section V of this BAA. Full
Proposals that exceed 10 pages in length and/or do not use the stated evaluation criteria as
section headings will not be reviewed.
a.
Innovation and Relevance
The Applicant is asked to describe its Clean Energy Solution and the specific manner in which it
will advance the objective of PAEGC.
Under this heading of their Full Proposals, Applicants must clearly address the following:
Why the proposed CES is considered as innovative and/or transformative in the proposed
area of implementation?
How the CES is notably different and better than available technologies, business models,
and or practices?
What are the specific barrier(s) to clean energy technology adoption that the CES will
address?
In what manner will the CES will lead to a measurable increase in productivity, agricultural
yields, increase in income/livelihoods for farmers or other beneficiaries, sustainable
agriculture practices, and/or other benefits of agricultural value chain activities in
developing countries?
30
In what manner will the CES measurably contribute to USAID Global Climate Change
mitigation/adaptation efforts 27: GHG emissions reduction, increased investment in climate
change mitigation/adaptation, clean energy generation, and/or energy efficiency?
b.
Project Design/Technical Approach
The Applicant is asked to describe what concrete result(s) PAEGC funding will enable them to
achieve, and what are the associated steps that need to be taken over the three years of funding to
achieve these results.
Under this heading of their Full Proposals, Applicants must clearly address the following:
What is the stated definition of success of the proposed CES and what are the tangible
result(s) will be achieved after three years?
What are the various stages of implementation of the proposed CES, and what are
measurable results that will be achieved at the completion of each stage?
What are the performance measures, indicators, and evaluation methods that will be used to
monitor progress and capture results of the planned activities?
In what manner will benefits of the proposed CES be gender equitable within the target
area of implementation? 28
What are the pre-identified associated risks/barriers to implementation that may hinder the
planned implementation of activities, and how significant are these risks?
c.
Business/ Financial Viability
The Applicant is asked to define the specific market in developing country/countries that their
Clean Energy Solution is targeting, and describe the key aspects and approach of the sustainable
business model that PAEGC resources will support.
Under this heading of their Full Proposals, Applicants must clearly address the following:
Detailed demographic information about the proposed target market and agricultural value
chain segment, specifying the actual/potential size of market, and portion of market that the
Applicant plans to capture with its Clean Energy Solution.
Analysis of how demand for the proposed CES was determined within the target market,
and why the proposed technical approach is viable for local country conditions.
27
Please see USAIDs Global Climate Change and Development Strategy 2012-2016 for more information:
http://www.usaid.gov/climate/strategy
28
Applicants are encouraged to review/reference USAIDs Gender Equity Policy http://transition.usaid.gov/our_work/policy_planning_and_learning/documents/GenderEqualityPolicy.pdf
31
d.
Organizational Capacity
The Applicant is asked to explain how it and its partners (if any) are qualified to implement all
planned activities associated with their Clean Energy Solution.
Under this heading of their Full Proposals, Applicants must clearly address the following:
The relevant skills and experiences of the key personnel and partners and strategic role of
partners in the project design - that will be engaged in the implementation of the CES.
What is the envisioned project management structure, and what are the reasons for
choosing this structure?
B.6
Supporting Documentation
To complement the submission of their Full Proposals, Semi-Finalist Applicants are also asked to
provide supplemental information about their organization and their proposed activities through
forms embedded in the OAP and by uploading associated documents.
a.
Budget and Budget Narrative
Embedded in the OAP is a form which all Applicants must complete that provides PAEGC with
their estimate expenditures over three years of implementation within various cost categories.
Through the online form, Applicants will also provide a brief Budget Narrative explaining the basis
for estimating each cost category, including reference to sources used in substantiating the cost
estimate (e.g. organization's policy, payroll document, vendor quotes, etc.), and the level/nature of
their Cost-Share Contribution. Applicants should budget one team member to attend PAEGC
event(s) in the first year, and estimate a cost of $5000 for airfare, accommodation, registration and
meals. The Budget portion of the Full Proposals will be reviewed for cost realism and cost
effectiveness. A sample of the online Budget and Budget Narrative form is included in Appendix 2.
b.
Past Performance Reference
Through the OAP, Applicants are asked to upload a form that describes up to three (3) previous
work experiences they have conducted that is relevant to the activities they are proposing for
PAEGC funding. A sample of the online Past Performance Reference form is included in
Appendix 3.
If an Applicant is proposing to use partners or sub-awardees that will provide 20% or more of the
work under the proposal, it must provide the same information for partnering organizations.
USAID may contact references and use past performance data, along with other information, to
determine the Applicants past performance. USAID reserves the right to obtain this information
from any and all sources inside or outside the government, and to use the information in evaluating
an Applicants past performance.
A prior USAID-funded contract, grant, or cooperative/collaboration agreement is not a prerequisite
to apply. Lack of prior USAID experience will not impact the scoring of the Applicants proposal.
32
c.
Resumes of Key Personnel
Through the OAP, Applicants are asked to upload no more than three resumes as PDF files, which
are each limited to two pages in length and one page for the Letter of Commitment. Resumes must
be ordered chronologically, starting with most recent experience. Each resume for the proposed
Key Personnel positions must be accompanied by a signed Letter of Commitment from the
candidate indicating his/her: (i) Availability to serve in the stated position, in terms of days after
award; (ii) Intention to serve for a stated term of the service; and (iii) Agreement to the
compensation levels set forth in the cost application.
Resumes for Key Personnel shall include at least three references for each proposed individual,
including up-to-date telephone numbers and e-mail contact information.
d.
Letters of Agreement with Partnering Organizations
If the Applicant has established a consortium or another relationship among its partners, the
Applicant shall upload a copy of the agreement letter. The agreement shall include a full discussion
of the relationship between the Applicant and partner organization(s), including identifying the
Applicant responsible for Award administration and the Applicant responsible for accounting. Also
the agreement shall discuss how the Award effort will be allocated and the expressed agreement of
the principals thereto to be held jointly and severely liable for the acts or omissions of the other.
Individual Letters of Agreement must be uploaded to the OAP as PDF files, and shall not be more
than one page in length
Note: Applicants are not required to partner with other organizations for the submission of
proposals. However, if Applicants do intend to partner with another organization, then they must
upload a Letter of Agreement.
e.
Data Universal Number (DUNS) and Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
All Finalist Applicants are asked this stage to obtain a Data Universal Number (DUNS) and be
registered with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR). This process can be slow; it is strongly
encouraged that organizations begin this process early. A DUNS number is a unique identifier that
verifies the existence of a business entity globally. DUNS numbers are assigned for each physical
location of a business. The CCR is the primary registrant database for the U.S. Federal
Government.
For more information about this process can be found here: Obtaining a DUNS
Number: http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. Registering with CCR: https://www.bpn.gov/ccr/
If a Finalist Applicant is not able to obtain a DUNS and register with CCR prior to submitting its
Full Proposal that is not a problem the Full Proposal will still be reviewed by USAID. However,
it is important to note that no award can be issued to an Apparent Awardee until these steps have
been taken.
B.7
Finalist Applicants those Full Proposals received the highest scores will be invited to present
their Clean Energy Solution to the Innovator Evaluation Board (IEB) through a face-to-face pitch
and due diligence session. These presentations will take place either in person or via video
teleconference (VTC). Key team members from each applicant/project may participate in the
presentation. The pitch sessions/presentations will be a 20 minutes long, followed by questions
from the IEB. Prior to delivering their presentations, the IEB may contact the Finalists to ask them
33
to provide further clarification about certain aspects of their proposed activities and implementation
plans.
The presentations shall include an overview of the most salient aspects about the Clean Energy
Solution and will give Applicants an opportunity to address weaknesses identified by reviewers.
The question and answer (Q&A) session following the presentations will enable the IEB to validate
responses regarding the key evaluation criteria of relevance, innovation, business and financial
viability (includes market potential), and technical approach/organizational capacity. This will
allow them to assess the quality of the management team and the project itself.
[END OF SECTION IV]
34
Innovation Question: What is your proposed Clean Energy Solution and how it is
remarkably different from currently available technologies, applications of technologies,
business models, and/or practices? (200 words)
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate the manner in which the Clean Energy Solutions
combined technology and business model are new and clearly different from exiting
products/approaches within the proposed area of implementation. (10 points for Window
1 Applicants; 5 points for Window 2 Applicants)
Market Potential Question: What is your target market(s) for the proposed Clean
Energy Solution and how will PAEGC resources be used to support the distribution,
maintenance, and commercialization of this proposed Clean Energy Solution? (200
words)
Evaluation Criteria: Articulate an identified target market, and demonstrate that the
Clean Energy Solution responds to a specific market demand and has the potential for
positive, sustainable impact on beneficiaries beyond the awards period of performance.
(5 points for Window 1 Applicants)
Only Funding Window 2 Applicants
Potential for Scale Question: In what manner will you be able to leverage
PAEGC resources to bring your Clean Energy Solution to a significantly expanded scale?
(200 word)
Evaluation Criteria: Clearly articulate how scaling-up the Clean Energy Solution will
satisfy and expand market demand, and the manner in which PAEGC funding will be
leveraged against other resources to facilitate this scaling. (10 points for Window 2
Applicants)
For each Concept Note Question, the USAID-led Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) will
review the responses given and give a numerical score for the response to each question. Funding
Window 1 Applicants will only be evaluated against other Funding Window 1 Applicants;
Funding Window 2 Applicants will only be evaluated against other Funding Window 2
Applicants.
Those Applicants whose Concept Notes receive the highest scores will advance to Stage 2 of the
selection process, and will be asked to submit a Full Proposal and supporting documentation.
Those Applicants whose Concept Notes did not receive competitive scores will be notified by
USAID that they did not advance to the next stage of evaluation. Given the large volume of
Concept Notes that PAEGC is expecting to receive, there will be no further feedback from USAID
regarding the strengths/weaknesses of individual applications that did not advance past Stage 1 of
the evaluation.
C. Stage 2. Full Proposal Review
Those Applicants that received the highest scores for their Concept Notes will be asked to submit
Full Proposals and supporting documentation. Each evaluation criteria is worth a total of 5 points
and will be scored on a scale of 0- 5 each. The highest score a Full Proposal can receive is 20
points. It is important to note that the evaluation criteria for the Business and Financial Viability
Full Proposal heading differ depending on whether Applicants are applying to Funding Window 1
or Funding Window 2. Full Proposals that are not formatted with each evaluation criteria
36
presented as separate section heading will not be reviewed. The Full Proposals will be
evaluated against the following criteria:
Innovation and Relevance
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate the manner in which the CES combined technology
and business mode: (i) Are innovative and clearly different from existing
products/approaches within the proposed area of implementation; (ii) Will address
barrier(s) to clean energy technology adoption in the agriculture sector; (iii) Will lead to a
measurable increase in productivity of agricultural value chain activities in
developing/advanced developing countries; and (iv) Will contribute to USAID Global
Climate Change mitigation/ adaptation efforts.
Project Design/Technical Approach
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate what are (i) The tangible result(s) that the proposed
Clean Energy Solution will have achieved after three years; (ii) The various stages of
implementation of the proposed CES; (iii) The indicators to be measured and the
evaluation methods that will be used to monitor progress, the gender equity of the
proposed CES; (iv) The associated social, economic, environmental, legal and regulatory
risk in the country(ies) that may hinder the planned implementation of activities, and (v)
The manner in which the benefits of the CES will be equitably realized from a gender
perspective within the proposed area of implementation.
Business/Financial Viability
Only Funding Window 1 Applicants:
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate what is: (i) The actual/potential size & demographic
characteristics of the target market; (ii) The estimated demand & willingness to pay for the
proposed CES within the target market; (iii) The source/nature/value of the required
internal and external Cost-Share contributions and how will they complement PAEGC
funding; (iv) The anticipated approach for maintaining and expanding operations after
PAEGC funding expires; and (v) The business model that provides total estimated cost
and partnerships if intended to get to success proof of concept, demonstration, and/or field
testing of the proposed CES.
Only Funding Window 2 Applicants
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate what is: (i) The actual/potential size & demographic
characteristics of the target market; (ii) The estimated demand & willingness to pay for the
proposed CES within the target market; (iii) The source/nature/value of the required
internal and external Cost-Share contributions and how will they complement PAEGC
funding; (iv) The anticipated approach for maintaining and expanding operations after
PAEGC funding expires; (v) The financial model that provides the estimated costs,
revenues, and profitability over the three years of implementation, and (vi) The business
strategy, marketing, and sales and distribution channels envisioned.
Organizational Capacity
Evaluation Criteria: Demonstrate what are (i) The relevant skills and experiences of the
key personnel and partners that will be engaged in the implementation of the Clean
37
Energy Solution; (ii) The specific examples of relevant previous activities related to
managing and conducting pilots, scaling, and validation activities; and (iii) Tour
experiences working in the proposed area of implementation and/or similar environments,
as well as the country(ies) of implementation.
Non-weighted Evaluation Factors for Semi-Finalist Applications:
Cost. In the later stages of review, costs included in the proposed budget will be
reviewed to ensure they are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. Cost effectiveness
will be considered in relation to any proposed Cost-Share.
If requested, budget proposals will also be subject to cost realism analysis. The cost
realism analysis will verify the applicant's understanding of the requirements, assess
the degree to which the cost application reflects the approaches in the technical
application, and assess the degree to which the costs included in the application
accurately represent the programmatic requirements set forth in the application.
Applications that do not present realistic costs may risk not being considered for
award.
[END SECTION V]
38
at http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/303mab.doc.
Assistance Awards to public international organizations will be required to submit certifications in
accordance with Chapter 308 of USAIDs ADS (ADS-308), including the Standard Provisions set
forth in ADS-308.5.15.
These documents are available for further information at:
ADS-308: http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/308.pdf
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants:
http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/surveyeo.pdf
SF-424 Cost application/Cost Application
Documents: http://www.grants.gov/agencies/approved_standard_forms.jsp.
Contracts to U.S. and non- U.S. governmental organizations and private organizations will be
required to submit certifications in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations and the
Agency for International Regulations (AIDAR) Supplemental, Chapter 302 of USAIDs
Automated Directives System (ADS-302), and Standard Provisions for U.S. and Non-U.S.
Nongovernmental Organizations.
These documents are available for further information at:
FAR: http://www.acquisition.gov/far/
AIDAR: http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/aidar.pdf
ADS-302: http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/302.pdf
Standard Provisions for U.S. and Non-U.S. Nongovernmental
Organizations: http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/ads/300/303maa.pdf
& http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/303mab.doc.
D. Intellectual Property
Intellectual property provisions applicable to contract awards are subject to the provisions of the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the USAID FAR Supplement (AIDAR) (available at
http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/aidar.pdf). When the awardee is a college, university,
nonprofit organization or small business firm, FAR clause 52.227-11 and FAR clause 52.227-14
shall apply. When the awardee is a large business firm, FAR clause 52.227-14 will apply. USAID
may include FAR Clause 52.227-16 Additional Date Requirements in the resulting contract if
appropriate.
USAID will utilize the following regulations for intellectual property (IP) issues arising from (1)
patent development, including USAID-funded research, technology development, and technology
transfer for commercialization or other distribution, (2) the creation and funding of copyrighted
material and marks; and (3) the handling of information that are trade secrets:
17 U.S.C. 101, 105
17 U.S.C. 301 305
22 CFR Part 226
35 U.S.C. 100-212
37 CFR Part 401, "Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit and Small Business Firms
under Government Grants, Contracts, and Corporate Agreements" (implementing the
Bayh-Dole Act) AIDAR Subchapter E Part 727
FAR Part 27 Patents, Data, and Copyrights
FAR 52.227-11, Patent Rights Ownership by the Contractor (short form) (for U.S.
nonprofit firms or small businesses)
FAR 52.227-13, Patent Rights Ownership by the Government (for other than U.S.
40
Any ongoing activities found to be outside the scope of the approved Regulation 216
environmental documentation shall be halted until an amendment to the documentation is
submitted and written approval is received from USAID. In addition, the recipient must comply
with host country environmental regulations unless otherwise directed in writing by USAID. In
case of conflict between host country and USAID regulations, the latter shall govern
H.
Reporting Requirements
Specific reporting requirements will be stipulated at the time of Award negotiation. Applicants
should anticipate the following deliverables to demonstrate the projects progress and success:
A detailed monitoring and evaluation plan, with expected timelines to completion
Annual progress report detailing the technical and programmatic achievements
A clear proof-of-principle demonstration described in the original proposal and
documented as part of the final report, including detailed documentation of the technical
work accomplished and success and lessons learned from the project.
Dissemination of knowledge through publications in peer-reviewed literature, patent
applications, etc.
In addition, awardees will likely be responsible for the following activities and documentation
during the life of the program:
Conducting ongoing assessment of progress and a final evaluation, and submitting
periodic reports according to the requirements outlined in the Award;
Briefing Powering Agriculture Partners on project progress and outcomes;
Cooperating with Powering Agriculture Partners to facilitate rigorous program
evaluations; and
Maintaining communication with key Powering Agriculture staff.
[END SECTION VI]
42
43
Activities implemented in the following countries may be eligible to receive funding from at least one of the Founding
Partners. Country eligibility is subject to change without notice.
44
Algeria
American Samoa
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Chile
Gabon
Grenada
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Jamaica
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Lebanon
Libya
Lithuania
Macedonia, FYR
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Malaysia
Maldives
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Montenegro
Palau
Panama
Peru
Romania
Russian Federation
Serbia
Seychelles
South Africa
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and the
Grenadines
Suriname
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Uruguay
Venezuela, RB
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
$5,000
45
Direct Labor: Direct salaries, wages and annual increases for all personnel proposed under
the application must be in accordance with the Applicant's established personnel policies.
46
Fringe Benefits: If the Applicant has a fringe benefit rate that has been approved by a USG
agency, such rate should be used and evidence of its approval should be provided. If a
fringe benefit rate has not been so approved, the application should propose a rate and
explain how the rate was determined. If the latter is used, the narrative should include a
detailed breakdown comprised of all items of fringe benefits (e.g., unemployment
insurance, workers compensation, health and life insurance, retirement, FICA, etc.) and the
costs of each, expressed in dollars and as a percentage of salaries.
Travel and Transportation: The application should indicate the number of trips,
domestic, regional, and international, and the estimated costs. Applicants should budget
one team member to attend PAEGC event(s) in the first year, and estimate a cost of $5000
for airfare, accommodation, registration and meals. Specify the origin and destination for
proposed trips, duration of travel, and number of individuals traveling. Per diem should be
based on the Applicants normal travel policies.
Allowances: Allowances must be broken down by specific type and by person and must be
in accordance with the Applicant's established policies.
Other Direct Costs: This could include any miscellaneous costs such as office rent and
utilities, communications, transportations, supplies, public outreach, sub-awards, audits,
report preparation costs, passports, visas, medical exams and inoculations, insurance (other
than the Applicant's normal coverage), etc. The narrative, or supporting schedule, should
provide a complete breakdown and support for each item of other direct cost
Indirect Costs: The Applicant should support the proposed indirect cost rate with a letter
from a cognizant U.S. Government audit agency, a Negotiated Indirect Cost Agreement
(NICRA), or with sufficient information for USAID to determine the reasonableness of the
rates (For example, a breakdown of labor bases and overhead pools, and the method of
determining the rate).
2.
Title of Award:
3.
Award Number:
4.
5.
Value of Award:
6.
Period of Performance/Duration of Award (Start
Date Closing Date):
7.
Technical Focus/Objective of Award:
8.
Problems Encountered (if any) during Award
Implementation:
9.
Contact details for Awarding/Funding Entity:
9a. Contract/Grant/Agreement Officers Name:
9b. Technical Officers Name:
9c. Current Phone Number of Awarding/Funding Entity:
9d. Current E-Mail Address Awarding/Funding Entity:
47
48