You are on page 1of 139

Standard: Distribution Design Manual Vol 5

Overhead Bare Conductor Distribution


Standard Number: HPC-5DC-07-005-2012

Document Control
Author

Name:

Anthony Seneviratne

Digitally signed by
Anthony Seneviratne
Date: 2014.02.14
08:23:35 +08'00'

Position: Standards Engineer


Document Owner
(May also be the Process Owner)
Approved By *

Name:

Justin Murphy
2014.02.17
11:55:29
+08'00'

Justin Murphy

Position: Manager Asset Management


Services
Name:

Justin Murphy
2014.02.17
11:55:57
+08'00'

Justin Murphy

Position: Manager Asset Management


Services
Date Created/Last Updated

February 2014

Review Frequency **

3 yearly

Next Review Date **

February 2017

* Shall be the Process Owner and is the person assigned authority and responsibility for managing the whole
process, end-to-end, which may extend across more than one division and/or functions, in order to deliver agreed
business results.
** Frequency period is dependent upon circumstances maximum is 5 years from last issue, review, or revision
whichever is the latest. If left blank, the default shall be 1 year unless otherwise specified.

Revision Control
Revision

Date

Description

14/02/2013

Initial Document

STAKEHOLDERS
The following positions shall be consulted if an update or
review is required:

NOTIFICATION LIST
The following shall be notified if an update or review is
required

Manager Engineering Services

Engineering & Projects

Manager Assets Management Services

Operations

Page 2 of 139

Print Date: 18/12/2013

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD ............................................................................................................ 10
1

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 11

1.1

General .................................................................................................................. 11

1.2

Pre Line Design Considerations .......................................................................... 11

DESIGN PROCESS.................................................................................... 13

2.1

Determine Design Inputs ........................................................................................ 13

2.2

Selection of Route .................................................................................................. 16

2.3

Selection of Conductor Size and Type ................................................................... 16

2.4

Route Survey and Ground Line Profile................................................................... 16

2.5

Conductor Stringing Tension and Ruling Span ...................................................... 17

2.6

Selection of Poles and Pole Tops .......................................................................... 17

2.7

Selecting Pole Positions and Pole Top Construction ............................................. 18

2.8

Drawing Line Profile ............................................................................................... 19

2.9

Checking Clearances ............................................................................................. 19

2.9.1

Ground Clearance................................................................................................................. 19

2.9.2

Two Circuit Lines .................................................................................................................. 19

2.9.3

Uplift ...................................................................................................................................... 19

2.9.4

Horizontal Clearances .......................................................................................................... 20

2.10

Checking Structure Capacity .................................................................................. 20

2.11

Optimisation of Design ........................................................................................... 21

DESIGN PRINCIPLES................................................................................ 22

3.1

Basic Methodology ................................................................................................. 22

3.2

Security Levels ....................................................................................................... 22

3.3

Design and Service Life ......................................................................................... 22

3.3.1

Minimum Design Wind Return Periods and Security Requirements .................................... 23

3.3.2

Security Level and Failure Containment ............................................................................... 23

3.3.3

Service Life of a Structure .................................................................................................... 24

3.4

Design Principles ................................................................................................... 24

3.4.1

Loading on Structures ........................................................................................................... 25

3.4.2

Risk Management Principles ................................................................................................ 26

3.4.3

Prudent Avoidance Principle................................................................................................. 26

3.4.3.1

Electro Magnetic Field Exposures ....................................................................................................... 26

3.5

Design Basis .......................................................................................................... 27

3.5.1

Limit States ........................................................................................................................... 27

Page 3 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.5.2

Limit State Design ................................................................................................................. 27

3.5.2.1

Limit State Design Loads .................................................................................................................... 28

3.5.2.2

Limit State Design Strength................................................................................................................. 28

3.5.3

Design Wind Speed .............................................................................................................. 28

3.5.4

Wind Loads ........................................................................................................................... 28

3.5.5

Span Reduction Factor (SRF) .............................................................................................. 30

3.5.6

Temperature ......................................................................................................................... 31

3.6

Strength and Serviceability Limit States ................................................................. 31

3.6.1

Ultimate Strength Limit State ................................................................................................ 31

3.6.2

Serviceability Limit State ....................................................................................................... 31

3.6.3

Strength Reduction Factors .................................................................................................. 31

3.7

Load Combinations ................................................................................................ 32

3.7.1

General ................................................................................................................................. 32

3.7.1.1

Permanent Loads ................................................................................................................................ 33

3.7.2

Load Conditions and Load Factors ....................................................................................... 33

3.7.2.1

Maximum Wind and Maximum Weight ................................................................................................ 33

3.7.2.2

Maximum Wind and Uplift ................................................................................................................... 33

3.7.2.3

Everyday Condition (sustained load) ................................................................................................... 33

3.7.2.4

Serviceability (deflection/damage limit) ............................................................................................... 33

3.7.2.5

Failure Containment Load ................................................................................................................... 33

3.8

Assessing loads on Supports ................................................................................. 35

3.8.1

Intermediate Pole .................................................................................................................. 35

3.8.2

Angle Pole............................................................................................................................. 35

3.8.3

Termination Pole ................................................................................................................... 35

3.8.4

Load Referral ........................................................................................................................ 35

3.8.5

Bending Moment ................................................................................................................... 35

3.8.6

Pole Strength ........................................................................................................................ 36

3.8.7

List of Symbols...................................................................................................................... 36

3.8.8

Distribution Worked Example ............................................................................................... 36

3.8.8.1

Ultimate Strength Limit State Assessment (Maximum Wind Load) ..................................................... 39

3.8.8.2

Everyday Load Condition Assessment ................................................................................................ 41

3.8.8.3

Serviceability Condition Assessment................................................................................................... 41

3.8.8.4

Failure Containment Condition Assessment ....................................................................................... 42

SUPPORT DESIGN .................................................................................... 44

4.1

Guidelines .............................................................................................................. 44

4.2

Pole Selection ........................................................................................................ 44

4.3

Foundation Design ................................................................................................. 45

4.3.1

Distribution Pole Foundations ............................................................................................... 46

Page 4 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

4.4

Pole Position Guidelines ........................................................................................ 46

4.4.1

Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 46

4.4.2

Designed Pole Alignment ..................................................................................................... 46

4.4.3

General Considerations for Pole Positioning ........................................................................ 47

4.4.3.1

Maximising Number of Customer Services ......................................................................................... 47

4.4.3.2

Street Lighting ..................................................................................................................................... 47

4.4.3.3

Future Extensions ............................................................................................................................... 47

4.4.3.4

Advantages by Positioning .................................................................................................................. 48

4.4.3.5

Earthed Poles ...................................................................................................................................... 49

4.4.3.6

Minimising Deviation Angles ............................................................................................................... 50

4.4.3.7

Proximity to Underground Services ..................................................................................................... 51

4.4.3.8

Road Intersections .............................................................................................................................. 51

4.4.3.9

Driveway Crossovers .......................................................................................................................... 52

4.4.3.10

Easements .......................................................................................................................................... 53

4.4.3.11

Circuit Overhang ................................................................................................................................. 53

4.4.3.12

Stays ................................................................................................................................................... 53

4.4.3.13

Common Lot Boundary Projection ...................................................................................................... 54

STAYS ........................................................................................................ 55

5.1

General .................................................................................................................. 55

5.2

Stay Arrangements................................................................................................. 55

5.3

Stay Formulae ........................................................................................................ 55

5.3.1

Single Stay ............................................................................................................................ 55

5.3.2

Vertical Double Stay ............................................................................................................. 55

5.3.3

Horizontal Double Stay ......................................................................................................... 55

5.3.4

Outrigger Stay ....................................................................................................................... 56

5.3.5

Loads on Poles ..................................................................................................................... 56

5.3.6

Stay Anchorage .................................................................................................................... 56

5.4

List of Symbols ....................................................................................................... 56

5.5

Worked Example .................................................................................................... 57

INSULATORS ............................................................................................ 58

6.1

Insulator Design ..................................................................................................... 58

6.1.1

Design for Pollution ............................................................................................................... 58

6.1.2

Pins ....................................................................................................................................... 58

6.2

Insulator Strength Limits......................................................................................... 59

6.3

Insulator Strength Determination............................................................................ 59

6.3.1

Standard Insulators ............................................................................................................... 60

6.4

Insulator Strength Calculations .............................................................................. 60

6.4.1

Example 1 ............................................................................................................................. 60

Page 5 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

6.4.2

Example 2 ............................................................................................................................. 61

CROSS-ARMS ........................................................................................... 63

7.1

Allowable Stress Limits .......................................................................................... 63

7.1.1

Wood Cross-arms ................................................................................................................. 63

7.1.2

Steel Cross-arms .................................................................................................................. 63

7.1.3

Standard Cross-arms ............................................................................................................ 63

7.2

Cross-arm Formulae .............................................................................................. 63

7.2.1

Cross-arm Strength............................................................................................................... 63

7.2.1.1

Intermediate and Angle Cross-arm:..................................................................................................... 63

7.2.1.2

Termination Cross-arm........................................................................................................................ 63

7.2.2

Loads on Cross-arms ........................................................................................................... 64

7.2.2.1

Intermediate ........................................................................................................................................ 64

7.2.2.2

Angle ................................................................................................................................................... 64

7.2.2.3

Termination ......................................................................................................................................... 65

7.3

List of Symbols ....................................................................................................... 65

7.4

Cross-arm Strength Calculation Examples ............................................................ 66

7.4.1

Calculating Forces ................................................................................................................ 66

7.4.2

Example 2 ............................................................................................................................. 68

CONDUCTORS .......................................................................................... 69

8.1

Selection of Conductor ........................................................................................... 69

8.1.1

Electrical Requirements ........................................................................................................ 69

8.1.1.1

Solar Absorption Coefficient ................................................................................................................ 70

8.1.1.2

Wind Velocity ...................................................................................................................................... 70

8.1.1.3

Wind Incident Angle ............................................................................................................................ 70

8.1.1.4

Temperature ........................................................................................................................................ 70

8.1.1.5

Intensity of Solar Radiation ................................................................................................................. 70

8.1.1.6

Ground Reflection Factor .................................................................................................................... 70

8.1.2

Mechanical Requirements .................................................................................................... 70

8.1.3

Environmental Requirements ............................................................................................... 71

8.1.4

Economic Requirements ....................................................................................................... 72

8.1.5

Conductors Currently Installed in the Network ..................................................................... 73

8.1.6

Standard Conductors ............................................................................................................ 74

8.2

Conductor Sag and Tension................................................................................... 74

8.2.1

Sag and Tension Calculations .............................................................................................. 74

8.2.2

Tension Limits ....................................................................................................................... 74

8.2.3

Conductor Stress and Fatigue .............................................................................................. 75

8.2.4

Span Ratios .......................................................................................................................... 76

8.2.4.1

Wind span ........................................................................................................................................... 76

Page 6 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.2.4.2

Weight span ........................................................................................................................................ 77

8.3

Clearance Requirements........................................................................................ 77

8.3.1

Non Flashover Distances ...................................................................................................... 77

8.3.2

Clearance from Ground ........................................................................................................ 78

8.3.3

Clearance from Structures .................................................................................................... 79

8.3.4

Vertical Spacing of Conductors of Different Circuits ............................................................. 81

8.3.5

Conductors on Same Supports............................................................................................. 83

8.3.6

Other Clearance.................................................................................................................... 87

8.4

Formulae ................................................................................................................ 87

8.4.1

Ruling Span .......................................................................................................................... 87

8.4.2

Sag ........................................................................................................................................ 87

8.4.2.1

Supports at Same Level: ..................................................................................................................... 87

8.4.2.2

Supports at Different Levels: ............................................................................................................... 87

8.4.2.3

At any Point X: .................................................................................................................................... 87

8.4.3

Tension ................................................................................................................................. 88

8.4.3.1

Set Conditions: .................................................................................................................................... 88

8.4.3.2

Varying Conditions: ............................................................................................................................. 88

8.4.3.3

Checking for Uplift: .............................................................................................................................. 88

8.5

Conductor Ratings ................................................................................................. 90

8.5.1

Conductor Thermal Rating.................................................................................................... 90

8.5.2

Conductor Fault Rating ......................................................................................................... 90

8.5.2.1

Annealing ............................................................................................................................................ 91

8.5.2.2

Maximum Design Operating Temperatures ......................................................................................... 91

8.5.2.3

Design Issues ...................................................................................................................................... 92

8.5.3

Sag/Tension Calculations ..................................................................................................... 92

8.5.3.1

Short bays (Urban) .............................................................................................................................. 92

8.5.3.2

Long Spans(Rural) .............................................................................................................................. 92

8.6

List of Symbols ....................................................................................................... 95

VOLTAGE REGULATION .......................................................................... 97

9.1

Voltage Tolerance Limits ........................................................................................ 97

9.1.1

Statutory Voltage Tolerance Limits ....................................................................................... 97

9.1.2

Voltage Drop Criteria ............................................................................................................ 97

9.1.3

Effect of Different Load Cycles ............................................................................................. 98

9.1.4

Voltage Drop Limits for LV Networks .................................................................................... 98

9.1.5

MV Voltage Regulation ......................................................................................................... 99

9.1.5.1

Design Approach ................................................................................................................................. 99

9.1.5.2

Computer Modelling ............................................................................................................................ 99

9.1.5.3

Voltage Control Equipment ................................................................................................................. 99

9.1.5.4

Calculating MV Voltage Drop ............................................................................................................ 100

Page 7 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

9.1.5.5

Worked Example ............................................................................................................................... 101

9.2

Line Drop Compensators (LDC) ........................................................................... 102

10

LV NETWORK DESIGN ........................................................................... 105

10.1

Introduction .......................................................................................................... 105

10.1.1

General ............................................................................................................................... 105

10.1.2

Primary Aim ........................................................................................................................ 105

10.1.3

Challenge for Network Designers ....................................................................................... 105

10.1.4

Use of Computer Packages ................................................................................................ 105

10.1.5

Aspects of Electrical Design ............................................................................................... 106

10.2

Determination of Recommended Load Demand Values ...................................... 106

10.2.1

Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 106

10.2.2

Effect of Load Diversity on Maximum Demand .................................................................. 107

10.2.3

Determination of Design Load Demand Values ................................................................. 107

10.2.4

Application of After Diversity Maximum Demand (ADMD) ................................................. 108

10.2.5

Residential Load ADMDs .................................................................................................... 109

10.2.6

Non-Residential Load Demands ......................................................................................... 109

10.2.7

Residential Lot Classification .............................................................................................. 109

10.2.8

LV Conductor Selection Guidelines .................................................................................... 110

10.2.9

LV Conductor Data Table ................................................................................................... 110

10.2.10 Selection of LV Feeder Routes ........................................................................................... 110


10.2.10.1 Proximity to Loads ............................................................................................................................. 110
10.2.10.2 Utilisation/Loading ............................................................................................................................. 111
10.2.10.3 Typical Lengths ................................................................................................................................. 111
10.2.10.4 Interconnection with Other Feeders .................................................................................................. 111
10.2.10.5 Pole Positioning and Alignment ......................................................................................................... 111
10.2.10.6 Other Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 111

10.3

Voltage Drops and Line Currents in LV Feeders.................................................. 112

10.3.1

General ............................................................................................................................... 112

10.3.2

Effect of Load Unbalance ................................................................................................... 112

10.3.3

Voltage Drops/Line Currents in Meshed Networks............................................................. 112

11

FAULT LEVEL ......................................................................................... 114

11.1

Introduction .......................................................................................................... 114

11.2

Equipment Rating ................................................................................................. 114

11.3

Fault Calculation .................................................................................................. 115

11.4

Formulae .............................................................................................................. 115

11.4.1

Ohmic Impedance ............................................................................................................... 116

11.4.2

Per Cent Impedance ........................................................................................................... 116

Page 8 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

11.4.3

Per Unit Impedance ............................................................................................................ 116

11.4.4

Worked Example using Per Unit method ............................................................................ 116

11.4.5

Worked example using MVA method ................................................................................. 119

11.4.6

Zone Substation Fault Levels ............................................................................................. 120

12

INSULATION COORDINATION ............................................................... 121

12.1

Introduction .......................................................................................................... 121

12.2

Design for Power Frequency Overvoltages.......................................................... 122

12.3

Design for Impulse voltages ................................................................................. 122

12.3.1

Lightning ............................................................................................................................. 122

12.3.1.1

Direct Strikes ..................................................................................................................................... 122

12.3.1.2

Induced Strokes ................................................................................................................................ 126

12.3.2

Current ................................................................................................................................ 127

12.3.3

Surge Impedance................................................................................................................ 127

12.3.4

Lightning Protection using Surge Arresters ........................................................................ 127

12.3.5

Selection of Surge Arresters ............................................................................................... 127

12.3.6

Impulse Flashover of Adjacent Insulators ........................................................................... 130

13

STREET LIGHTING.................................................................................. 131

13.1

Policy .................................................................................................................... 131

13.2

Asset Hierarchy .................................................................................................... 131

13.3

Lighting Categories and Application ..................................................................... 131

13.4

Lighting Design Basis ........................................................................................... 133

13.4.1

Selection of Lamp Types .................................................................................................... 133

13.4.2

Luminaire Technical Requirements .................................................................................... 133

13.4.3

Design Considerations ........................................................................................................ 133

13.4.4

Minimum Lighting Performance Requirements .................................................................. 134

13.4.5

Lamp Poles ......................................................................................................................... 134

13.4.6

Electrical Protection of Street Lights ................................................................................... 136

APPENDIX A REVISION INFORMATION ....................................................................................................... 138


APPENDIX B RELATED INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 139

Page 9 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

FOREWORD
This volume is one in a series of five volumes, which together, form the Horizon Power
Distribution Design Manual. The DDM is intended to be a comprehensive reference manual
for distribution design work carried out by professional engineers and technical support staff.
The five volumes are:
Volume 1: Quality of Electricity Supply
Volume 2: Low Voltage Aerial Bundled Cable
Volume 3: Supply to Large Customer Installations
Volume 4: Underground Residential Distribution (URD)
Volume 5: Overhead Bare Conductor Distribution
The DDM will also serve to initiate "newcomers" to distribution work in Horizon Power without
them having to start from scratch. It serves to establish "standards" for design work to ensure
that we get the best value from our facilities - not only in terms of initial cost, but also in terms
of component availability, length of service life and cost-effective maintenance. In addition to
this, the DDM will also serve as a teaching aid for courses run by Horizon Power.
This volume describes the engineering process involved in designing and providing
electricity supplies using bare overhead conductor.
It describes the design process in detail, making use of standardised design information for
use with routine work.

Page 10 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

INTRODUCTION

1.1

General
This document describes the engineering process involved in designing
distribution overhead power lines. These lines typically originate from Zone
substations as Medium Voltage lines and are stepped down to Low Voltage
through distribution transformers. Low Voltage overhead power lines then
transmit power from transformers to customer installations. Some customers are
supplied directly from the Medium Voltage network.
Overhead Power lines account for a significant proportion of Horizon Power's
networks. These assets involve large amounts of capital expenditure, both by
Horizon Power and customers. Also, these lines need to be properly designed
and constructed and it is imperative that a high level of engineering input is put
into their designs, particularly because these lines may be built in cyclonic areas.
Effort expended here could avoid unnecessary expenses for Horizon Power and
customers and ensure that the customer's requirements and all of Horizon
Power's requirements are catered for.
Each overhead line requires different design considerations, configurations,
layouts, etc. As such, there may be many different ways to approach a design.
The information contained in this manual will assist the designer to develop a
structured design approach, and ensure that the optimum line configuration is
selected at all times.

1.2

Pre Line Design Considerations


There are certain basic requirements that have to be considered when designing
overhead distribution power lines. These requirements fall within the broader
National Standards and Guidelines (e.g. AS 7000). This manual has been put in
place to facilitate the development of innovative project designs that will aim at:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)

Reduced cost to customers;


Reduced Life Cycle ( Maintenance) costs;
Greater durability with due consideration to location in a cyclonic areas;
Safety of workers and the General Public;
Environmental Compatibility;
Electromagnetic Field Compatibility;
Favourable public acceptance ( aesthetics); and
Increased network safety and reliability

When the requirement for a line has been established, the following factors need
to be considered before the design can commence. They are:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)

Potential number of Customers and total load;


Estimation of potential load growth;
Availability/ and or requirement for interconnections;
Selection of Voltage for line operation;
Size and location of loads (Bulk supply, transformers)
Selection of Route
Length of line
Life Cycle costs

Page 11 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The capacity (load) to be carried by the power line during its lifetime together with
voltage drop and fault rating considerations will dictate the size and type of
conductor to be used. The line design process is discussed in Chapter 2.

Page 12 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

DESIGN PROCESS
Typical steps in an overhead distribution line design are shown below. The actual
steps and their sequence will depend upon the individual project and the context
in which the design is performed.
The process is iterative, with the designer making some initial assumptions, e.g.
as to pole height and size, which may later need to be adjusted as the design is
checked and gradually refined. The optimum arrangement that meets all
constraints is required as the final outcome. Horizon Power uses overhead line
simulation software to aid the design process.
The generalised design process is shown in Figure 2.1.

2.1

Determine Design Inputs


Prior to commencing design, it is important to collect and document all relevant
design inputs. This may include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)

planning reports, concept, specification or customer request for supply


initiating the project;
load details, disturbing loads etc;
special requirements of customers or stakeholders (e.g. supply reliability);
system planning requirements;
information about possible future stages or adjacent developments, road
widening or other;
applicable relevant standards and statutory requirements;
co-ordination with other utilities - 'Dial Before You Dig' results
co-ordination with road lighting design;
survey plans or base maps;
any site constraints identified and
environmental factors (as elaborated below)

The designer should take into consideration the environmental factors which
could influence the design of the supply arrangement, e.g. selection of and
location of equipment, etc.
For example, suppose an overhead MV line is to be constructed to supply a
customer remote from a zone substation, and the line route traverses an area of
high lightning activity. It would seem prudent for the designer to include an earthwire system to shield the conductors, in the line design, even though this is not
normal practice for distribution lines.
Similar considerations should apply for lines or installations close to the coast,
which are subjected to high salt-pollution levels. High pollution insulators may be
incorporated in the line design.
Consideration must be given to the location of the equipment or the environment
the equipment is to operate in. For example, a pole top transformer may not be
entirely suitable for use outside a cement plant or quarry, where the build up of
fly-ash or dust on insulators may lead to nuisance tripping or a disproportionately
high level of maintenance. Others include mines sites, with open air blasting, etc.

Page 13 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Consideration shall also be given to:

Cultural Heritage and Native Title;

Environmental approvals for clearing or removal of native vegetation; and

Siting of Substations with respect to Noise Control.

Current statutory processes require a range of approvals to be obtained prior to


commencement of works. Due to the time taken to obtain these approvals, these
issues must be considered at the commencement of a project.
As per the Western Australian Distribution Connections Manual (WADCM
Section 6.12) environmental and heritage impacts must be investigated and
managed by the applicant for power supply and their agent. Issues may include
but are not limited to the following:
a)

Aboriginal heritage sites and objects of suspected aboriginal origin;

b)

Acid sulphate soils;

c)

Bio-security weeds, pests and disease spread (e.g. dieback disease);

d)

Declared rare flora and threatened ecological communities;

e)

Dust;

f)

Erosion;

g)

Land entry permits;

h)

Native title;

i)

Noise;

j)

Protected wetlands;

k)

Vegetation clearing permits; and

l)

Waste management including controlled waste.

The design should be 'traceable' back to a set of design inputs. Persons other
than the original designer should be able to review the design and see why it was
done a certain way.

Page 14 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Determine Design Inputs/Customer Requests/Network Project Requirements

Select Route

Select Conductor Type and Size

Conduct Route Survey and Draw Ground Line Profile

Select Conductor Stringing Tension and Determine Typical Span Length

Select Pole Positions, Heights/Strengths and Pole Top Construction

Draw Line Profile

Check Vertical Clearances/Uplift/Horizontal clearances / Check Clearance to


structures and other obstacles

Check Structure Capacity Matches Mechanical Loads

Nominate Fittings and Other Requirements

Design Satisfactory
NO

YES
Continue to Design Review/Approval Process

Figure 2.1 Flowchart for General Design Process

Page 15 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2.2

Selection of Route
Ideally, the line route should be as short and straight as possible in order to
minimise costs, minimise stays and have a tidy appearance. However, some
other factors that need to be taken into account are:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)

2.3

Land issues, ease of acquisition, rights over private lands etc.;


Ease of obtaining necessary approvals;
Stakeholder considerations and acceptance;
Vegetation clearing, environmental and visual impact, EMF impact;
Access for construction, maintenance and operations;
Ease of servicing all lots for Low Voltage Lines;
Compatibility with future development;
Waterways, parks and natural habitat; and
Terrain suitability and ground conditions (excavation, pole foundation etc.)

Selection of Conductor Size and Type


Selection of conductors is covered in section 8.1. Factors influencing selection
include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)

2.4

Load current and whether the line is 'backbone' or a spur;


Line voltage and voltage profile along the line;
Fault levels and line rating;
Environmental conditions ambient temperature, vegetation, wildlife,
pollution or salt spray;
Compatibility with existing adjacent electrical infrastructure;
Required span lengths and stringing tension; and
Future requirements with respect to distribution system planning.

Route Survey and Ground Line Profile


A line route survey is carried out to determine:
a)
b)
c)

Details of existing electricity infrastructure;


Terrain and site features, e.g. trees, access tracks, fences, gullies; and
Ground line rise and fall along the route.

Ground line profiling may not be necessary for minor projects in urban areas
where the ground is reasonably level or has a consistent slope throughout and
there are no on site obstructions.
The designer can check worst case ground clearances by deducting the sag in
the span from the height of the supports at either end by taking the following
measurements:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)

Conductor temperature
Conductor size/type
Ambient temperature
Conductor attachment point with respect to ground level
Strain points

Page 16 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

However, ground line profiling is essential where:


1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Poles have to be positioned along an undulating traverse;


There is a 'hump' or change in gradient in the ground at mid span;
Outside of urban areas where spans are comparatively long-say in excess
of 80 m;
The designer has doubts about the adequacy of required clearances; and
Where uplift on poles is suspected.

The equipment used to obtain measurements will depend on the complexity of


the project. For many distribution lines, a simple electronic distance measuring
device and inclinometer are adequate. Elsewhere, use of a high end GPS unit or
LiDAR may be warranted. The route is broken up into segments, typically
corresponding with 'knee points' or changes in gradient. Slope distance and
inclination measurements for each segment can be converted to chainage and
reduced level (RL) values to facilitate plotting as follows:
Software packages can be used to plot survey data. Apart from the ground line,
various features and stations must be shown, including existing poles, gullies,
fences, obstacles, roadways. A clearance line is then drawn offset from the
ground line, according to the minimum vertical clearances that apply (refer
chapter 8).

2.5

Conductor Stringing Tension and Ruling Span


Refer to Chapter 8 for guidance on selecting a suitable stringing tension and
Ruling Span.

2.6

Selection of Poles and Pole Tops


Typical pole sizes are presented in Table 4.7. When selecting poles, potential
future sub-circuits and streetlight mounting must be considered, if these are
identified / known during the design phase.
Apart from spanning and angular limitations, selecting a suitable pole top
configuration should take in to account:
1)
2)
3)
4)

Life cycle suitability;


Reliability;
Suitability for the environment (vegetation, wild life, salt and/or industrial
pollution levels); and
Ease of construction and maintenance.

Horizontal (flat) construction has the advantage of reduced pole height at the
expense of a wider line and corresponding broader easement width.
Flat configurations are preferred in areas frequented by birds. For higher risk
spans increasing conductor separation can reduce conductor flashover due to
bird impact. Attaching bird diverters on conductors is also effective as a visual
warning to birds.
Delta pin configuration provides for both horizontal and vertical separation and
helps reduce conductor clashing.

Page 17 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Overall, more compact pole top configurations are less visually obstructive. It is
best to keep to reasonably consistent configurations to maintain visual amenity
as well as maintain spanning capability and ease of conductor phasing.

2.7

Selecting Pole Positions and Pole Top Construction


Refer to section 4.4 for pole positioning guidelines.
Firstly, position poles along the route at any key or constrained locations.
Next determine the maximum span length that can be achieved over flat ground
given the attachment heights on poles, the sag at the nominated stringing tension
and the required ground clearance. Also check the spanning capability of the
pole top constructions to be used. Position poles along the route so that this
spacing is not exceeded. If there are gullies between poles, the spacing can be
increased and if there are 'humps' mid-span, span lengths can be reduced.
Strain Points, Pole Details and Pole Top Constructions have to be determined.
Strain point locations need to be determined:
1)
2)

3)
4)
5)
6)

To isolate electrically different circuits.


To keep very short spans or very long spans mechanically separate, such
that all spans in a strain section are of similar length (no span less than half
or more than double the ruling span length, and on tight-strung lines, the
longest span not more than double the shortest span). Failure to limit span
variance can cause excess sagging in longest span at higher design
temperature loadings.
To isolate critical spans, e.g. spans over a river, major highway or railway
line, to help facilitate repairs or maintenance.
On line deviation angles too great for intermediate constructions, e.g.
Cross-arms with pin insulators.
At locations where there are uplift forces on poles.
At intervals of approximately 10 spans or so.

The following points also must be considered:


1)
2)
3)
4)

Strain section length limitation will be favourable if a line is affected by


wires brought down in a storm. Also, the length of conductor on a drum
may be a consideration.
Span lengths within the strain section must be reasonably similar and poles
and pole top construction used must be reasonably consistent, as this
gives the line a tidy appearance.
When nominating suitable pole top constructions for intermediate poles,
adequate capacity must be available for the deviation angle at each site.
Pole strengths and foundation types/sinking depths must be nominated as
a first pass, as these may need to be amended later once tip loads are
determined. Stronger poles will be required at terminations and on large
deviation angles. Pole sinking depths can be determined in accordance
with Table 4.7.

Page 18 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2.8

Drawing Line Profile


Overhead line simulation software program can be used to draw the line profile.
Poles are shown to scale on the profile, with marks placed at the support points
for each circuit.
The conductors are shown by selected conductor type, stringing tension and
ruling span linking two support points for the circuit. Different conductor profiles
can be generated to depict the varying temperature conditions such as the
maximum design temperature, everyday temperature, cold or uplift conditions.

2.9

Checking Clearances

2.9.1

Ground Clearance
If the line profile screen shows that there is insufficient ground clearance (refer to
clause 8.3.2) the designer may need to:

2.9.2

Reduce span length;

Increase stringing tension;

Increase pole height; and

Adjust pole positions to try to fit in better with the terrain.

Two Circuit Lines


Where there are spans with an upper circuit and a lower circuit, the inter circuit
clearance should be checked. (Refer to section 8.3).

2.9.3

Uplift
Poles at the bottom of a hill or in a gully are prone to uplift. Under cold conditions,
the conductors heading up the slope will become tight and pull upward on
structures, causing damage.
Uplift is generally not a problem if it is on one side of the structure only and offset
on the opposite side by a downward force, as may occur with a line with
successive spans running down a steep slope. However, if on both sides of an
intermediate structure such as a suspension or pin construction, it needs to be
addressed. Possible solutions include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)

Changing the pole top construction to a termination type;


Moving the pole to a different location;
Reducing stringing tension;
Increasing pole height; and
Reducing heights of adjacent poles subject to having adequate ground
clearance.

Uplift is managed in different ways in line design software packages. It is


important to verify how to conduct this important check.

Page 19 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2.9.4

Horizontal Clearances
The designer should check that there are adequate horizontal clearances
between the line and any nearby structures (e.g. flag poles, buildings, bridge
columns, streetlight columns) or embankments. (Refer to clause 8.3.3) These
clearances should be checked for both - (a) the no wind condition and (b) the
blowout conditions.
Ways of addressing horizontal clearance problems include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)

2.10

Increasing conductor tension;


Reducing span length;
Relocating poles to a different alignment;
Ensuring that poles are placed in line with any objects, so that there is nil
blow out;
Using different pole top constructions, e.g. vertical construction;
Using insulated cables or underground cables rather than bare conductors
where feasible;
Relocating objects affected, where feasible, e.g. Streetlights; and
Increasing line height to skip over the object, where feasible.

Checking Structure Capacity


Tip load calculations must be undertaken for each of the poles, in the line. Forces
exerted by conductors are detailed in Chapter 3. Conductors attached
significantly below the tip have their applied force scaled down proportionately.
Forces are added as vectors, not scalar quantities unless in the same direction.
The applied tip load is then compared with the capacity of the pole.
Where the pole has more than adequate strength, the designer may investigate
whether it is feasible to drop down to a smaller size, e.g. from a 24 kN to an
16 kN pole. This may mean an adjustment to sinking depth as a consequence,
which will affect the profile marginally.
Where the pole has insufficient strength, the designer will usually consider
increasing pole size, or else fitting a stay, if space permits. Details of stay types,
sizing and positioning are given in Chapter 5. Where space for a stay is restricted
or a pole is unsuitable for staying, the designer may reduce stringing tensions, or
even use a short, slack span, then stay the next pole along as shown in
Figure 2.2. The decision to use a stay should be a last resort, especially in high
traffic, livestock movement or arable cropping land areas.

Figure 2.2 Short slack span

Page 20 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2.11

Optimisation of Design
The design process is iterative. The initial first-pass design is 'tweaked'
repeatedly until it complies with all technical (standards and regulations) and
stakeholder requirements and is optimal in terms of cost, reliability and
practicality for construction, maintenance and operations.

Page 21 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

DESIGN PRINCIPLES

3.1

Basic Methodology
The design methodology involves the development of a suite of appropriate
structures, insulation and constructions for use at the various voltage levels to
comply with AS 7000 - Overhead Line Design (Detailed Procedures). The
overhead line has to perform with suitable levels of reliability and security for the
weather related loads expected in the region it is installed for the entirety of its
intended life.

3.2

Security Levels
All overhead lines should be designed for a selected security level relevant to
the lines importance to the system (including consideration of system
redundancy), its location and exposure to climatic conditions, and with due
consideration for public safety and design working life.
AS 7000 (Chapter 6) provides a framework to evaluate and select standard
designs to suit a relevant security level appropriate to a particular line, line
construction class or line type.
The security levels are defined below:

3.3

Level 1

Applicable to overhead lines where collapse of the line may be


tolerable with respect to social and economic consequences.
(Normal distribution lines).

Level 2

Applicable to overhead lines where collapse of the line would


cause negligible danger to life and property and alternative
arrangements can be provided if loss of support services occurs.
(Higher security distribution lines and normal transmission lines).

Level 3

Applicable to overhead lines where collapse of the line, would


cause unacceptable danger to life or significant economic loss to
the community and sever vital post disaster services. (Higher
security transmission lines).

Design and Service Life


The design life, or target nominal service life expectancy of the line is
dependent on its exposure to a number of variable factors such as solar
radiation, temperature, precipitation, wind and seismic effects.
The service life of an overhead line is the period over which it will continue to
serve its intended purpose safely, without undue maintenance or repair
disproportionate to its cost of replacement and without exceeding any specified
serviceability criteria.
The structural supports must be able to withstand the ultimate design loadings
without failure, during this period. This may include providing allowance for a
reducing load factor over time due to progressive degradation such as soft rot in
timber poles and corrosion in steel poles.

Page 22 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.3.1

Minimum Design Wind Return Periods and Security Requirements


Maximum design wind return periods for an expected design working life and
security level are provided in Table 6.1 of AS 7000 and reproduced in Table
3.1 below.
Table 3.1 - Ultimate Limit State Wind Return Periods for Service Life
and Line Security Levels
Minimum design wind return period ( all wind regions)
Line security level
Service life

Level 1

Level 2

Level
3polycarp3

Temporary construction and construction


equipment, e.g. hurdles, scaffolding and
temporary line diversions with design life of
less than 6 months

10

20

< 5 years

10

20

40

25 years

25

50

100

50 years

50

100

200

100 years

100

200

400

When selecting the appropriate security level, consideration must be given


to the line length, number of circuits and proximity to other lines or
infrastructure, special exposed locations such as long span water or valley
crossings, or line locations where access makes it difficult to restore the line
in terms of time and cost. In such case, a higher security level must be
adopted for a particular structure.
Horizon Powers overhead distribution lines must be designed to Level 1
security, with lines over waterways, railway crossings and lines supplying
defined high security installations designed to Level 2 security.
3.3.2

Security Level and Failure Containment


The security level must prevent cascading failures in the event of a single
support failure due to an external cause such as major wind storm with
extensive wind borne debris or major flooding.
When a single pole fails and conductors are broken (due to say, vehicle
impact or storm debris overload), the adjacent poles deflect such that they
may provide sufficient release of load in the conductors to limit the extent of
damage, particularly when there is localised failure of the overhead line.
When a single pole fails due to ground line failure, the conductor system will
most probably restrain the pole from falling to ground. However, the
conductor tensions in adjacent spans will increase dramatically and pose a
maintenance work safety issue. Where more extensive overload occurs due
to major wind storms for example, the containment potential from a higher
security level provides the benefit of conserving poles whereas aerial
conductors most probably will be brought down.

Page 23 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

On distribution overhead pole lines, pole deflection (usually rotational and


lateral or longitudinal) combined with partial foundation deformation, will
occur when abnormal longitudinal loads are applied.
As per AS 7000, on poles subject to tension such as termination poles,
failure containment conditions must be considered during design.
3.3.3

Service Life of a Structure


The service life of a structure (e.g. pole) is the period in years over which it will
continue to serve its intended purpose safely, without undue maintenance or
repair disproportionate to its cost of replacement and without exceeding any
specified serviceability criteria. This recognises that cumulative deterioration of
the structure over time will occur, due to wear and tear or environmental effects.
Therefore, in order to maintain structural integrity within adequate design
margins, adequate maintenance and possible minor repairs will be required from
time to time to maintain the structure in a safe and useable condition over its
service life.
Structures and fittings located close to the sea typically within 1.0 km from the
sea will be subjected to more severe exposure and would normally require either
special protection or a shorter service life. Experience in these coastal regions
suggests that metallic fittings will be the weakest link over time and may need to
be replaced more than once during the service life of the structure.
Horizon Power is committed to using steel poles on new lines and when
replacing poles on existing lines. The above ground service life of steel poles is
expected to be 50 years, using hot dip galvanizing that provides a minimum
average zinc coating mass of 400 g/m2, in line with Table D2 of AS 7000. By
using 600 g/m2, of zinc galvanizing on steel, the above ground service life can be
extended to 75 years.
Added protection will be required for the portion of the steel pole embedded in
the ground and just above ground line to prevent degradation and loss of
strength due to corrosion.

3.4

Design Principles
The main technical aspects in the design of overhead lines are ensuring that:

the mechanical load forces do not exceed the strength of structures or


other components, and

there are adequate clearances between the conductors and the ground
or from other objects in the vicinity of the line, as well as between the
various phase conductors and circuits themselves so that clashing does
not occur.

The line must comply with these requirements over the full design range of
weather and other load conditions that could reasonably encountered when the
line is cold and taut, when at its maximum design temperature and consequently
when conductor sag is at a maximum, and under maximum wind conditions. The
load conditions to be considered for Horizon Power lines are set out in the
following sections, where applicable wind pressures, temperatures and load
factors are provided.

Page 24 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.4.1

Loading on Structures
The loads on a structure consist of three mutually perpendicular systems of load
acting vertical, normal to the direction of line, and parallel to the direction of the
line. These loads can be described as:

Vertical load

Transverse load

Longitudinal load

Vertical loads
Vertical loads include the weight of conductors, earth wires, cross arms and pole
mounted plant such as transformers.
Transverse loads
Transverse loads are caused by wind on conductor and structure and horizontal
tension from deviation angle in the line.
Longitudinal loads
Longitudinal loads are caused by difference in conductor tension on either side of
termination structures, adjacent spans being of different lengths and an abnormal
(broken wire) load on the structure.

Figure 3.1 - Forces on Poles

Page 25 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.4.2

Risk Management Principles


The layout design process should include the identification and assessment of
risks associated with the construction, maintenance and operation of the
proposed line leading to the evaluation and implementation of risk treatment
options which ensure that the residual risk is acceptable to Horizon Power.

3.4.3

Prudent Avoidance Principle


Where potential risks with unproven consequences are involved, a prudent
avoidance approach is recommended. This essentially means doing what can be
done without undue inconvenience and at modest expense to avert a possible
risk.

3.4.3.1

Electro Magnetic Field Exposures


Due to the need to provide supply to customers, the options available to
designers in locating distribution lines and substations are limited. Distribution
lines, by their very nature and function are normally located in road reserves to
provide supply to customers on both sides of the road. Where practicable to
reduce electromagnetic exposures: distribution lines should be:
a)
b)
c)

Located on the opposite side of the road from areas such as schools,
kindergartens, child-care centres and the like.
Sited away from the walls of multi storey buildings or areas where children
congregate.
Located on the side of the road bordered by open spaces where
applicable.

Prudent design options to reduce electromagnetic exposures from distribution


lines include but not limited to:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.

Use of aerial bundled cables for low voltage reticulation to provide more
effective field cancellation
Balancing of load across all phases to reduce neutral currents
Adopt a low reactance (RWB/BWR) phasing when current flow in both
circuits is in the same direction for new double circuit lines,
For lines with both medium and low voltage conductors, the phasing on
existing circuits should be determined when building under/over existing
facilities to minimise combined magnetic field strength.

Page 26 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.5

Design Basis
The Limit State design approach uses a reliability based (risk of failure) approach
to match component strengths (modified by a factor to reflect strength variability)
to the effect of loads calculated on the basis of an acceptably low probability of
occurrence.

Rn > effect of loads (Wn + xX)


Where:

3.5.1

the applied loads pertinent to each loading condition

=
are load factors which take into account variability of loads, importance
of structure, stringing, maintenance and safety considerations etc.

Wn

=
the strength reduction factor which takes into account variability of
material, workmanship etc.

Rn

wind load based on a selected return period wind

the nominal strength of the component

Limit States
To maintain structural integrity, the structure strength must always exceed the
applied mechanical load, otherwise the line passes beyond the limit of its intact
state to a damaged state or failed state. Beyond these limits, the line no longer
satisfies the design performance requirements. Limit state design principles will
be further discussed in clause 3.5.2 Limit State Design.

State of the system

Intact state

Strength limits

Damaged state or
deflected state

Damage Limit
(serviceability limit state)

3.5.2

Failed state

Failure Limit
(ultimate limit state)

Limit State Design


Limit state design approach takes into account statistical variations in loads and
material properties of structures such as poles to achieve a desired level of
reliability.
Limit state loads are compared with limit state strength (includes deflection limit
state). The limit state strength needs to be greater than the limit state loads for
each load combination. Also, the design deflection limits need to be greater than
the load effect on deflection.
Limit state principles apply to other components of an overhead power line
including conductors and insulators, and also to electrical clearances. All
electrical components have properties which vary with manufacturing and
weather conditions.

Page 27 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.5.2.1

Limit State Design Loads


Limit state loads include variable factors (load multipliers) which account for the
uncertainty in the magnitude of the load from various effects such as wind,
component weight etc.

3.5.2.2

Limit State Design Strength


Limit state design strength considers modification factors for durability,
processing effects, fatigue, load sharing, temperature effects, duration of load
creep etc, as appropriate, as well as the more general component strength
factor.

3.5.3

Design Wind Speed


A complete coverage of wind loading is given in Appendix B of AS 7000
Standards.
The design site wind speed is taken as Vz =

V50 Md Mz,cat Ms Mt

where
Mz,cat =

gust winds speed multiplier for terrain category (From Table 3.4 ) based
on AS/NZS 1170.2

Md

wind direction multiplier (taken as equal to 1, for wind in any direction)

Ms

shielding multiplier is taken as equal to 1 ignoring the effects of


shielding provided by buildings and other structures.

Mt

topographic multiplier for gust wind speed normally taken as 1.

V50

basic regional wind velocity for the region corresponding to the 50 year
return period. (39, 52 and 60 m/s for regions A, C and D respectively)
Please note that for V100 , the corresponding values are 41, 56 and 66
m/s. (Refer to Table 3.5 for wind regions)

Note: As per Appendix B3 of AS 7000, cyclonic wind amplification factors are not
applicable to Regions C & D.
The design pressure qz shall be calculated as follows:

qz

3.5.4

0.6Vz2 103 kPa

Wind Loads
Wind loads shall be applied to all elements of an overhead line.
The design wind pressure qz for different types of surfaces can be calculated
by multiplying with the drag force coefficient for that particular surface (Cd)
qz = 0.6 Vz2 x Cd x 10

-3

kPA (Refer to clause 3.5.3)

The drag force coefficient (Cd), for various equipment, is given in Table 3.2
below:

Page 28 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 3.2 Drag Coefficients for components


Equipment

Suggested Cd Factor

Round Poles Smooth

1.0

Round Poles Rough

1.3

Octagonal pole

1.4

Transformers

1.5

Regulators

1.2

Conductors (assumed SRF =1)

1.0

Crossarms (end/wide face)

1.2/1.6

Insulators (post/pin/strain)

1.2

Table 3.3 Terrain Height Multiplier


Terrain Height Multiplier (Mz,cat)
Height (m)

Category 1

Category 2

Category 3

Category 4

Region C, D

Region C, D

Region C, D

Region C, D

0.98

0.98

0.854

0.854

10

1.0

1.0

0.89

0.89

12

1.028

1.028

0.926

0.914

14

1.056

1.056

0.938

0.938

16

1.084

1.084

0.962

0.962

Terrain Multiplier for Region A is taken as 1 for structures up to 60 m height.


(Figure B.3 of AS 7000)

Page 29 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 3.4 Terrain Categories Definition


Terrain
Category
1

Description
Exposed open terrain

Open terrain, water surfaces, grassland with few well scattered


obstructions having heights generally from 1.5 m to 10.0 m.

Terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions 3 m to 5 m


high such as areas of suburban housing.

Terrain with numerous large, 10 m to 30 m high and closely


spaced obstructions such as large city centres and well
developed industrial complexes.

Table 3.5 Regions Definitions and Wind Pressures


Wind Pressure (Pa)
Region

3.5.5

Description

Esperance and any other area beyond


200 kms from the coast

Broome, Wyndham, Kununurra

Port Hedland, Karratha, Onslow,


Carnarvon

V50

V100

900

1000

1600

1900

2150

2600

Span Reduction Factor (SRF)


The span reduction factor takes into account the spatial characteristics of wind
gusts and inertia of conductors. When determining wind pressure on conductor,
for conductor tension calculations, SRF for the related tension section must be
used.

Page 30 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

For Region A, SRF = 1, for spans up to 200 m and for spans > 200, calculate
SRF using the formula:
SRF = 1.0 {(span length - 200)/1000} x 0.3125
For Regions C and D, calculate SRF using the formula:
SRF = 0.59 + 0.41 e (- span length/210)

3.5.6

Temperature
Ambient temperature for Region A is 40 C (summer) and 15 C (winter) and for
Regions C & D 45 C (summer) and 35 C (winter).
Maximum conductor temperature must not exceed 75 C, to ensure that electrical
clearances are maintained.

3.6

Strength and Serviceability Limit States

3.6.1

Ultimate Strength Limit State


Ultimate limit state is the maximum load carrying resistance of a structure or
structural element. It is associated with collapse or other forms of structural
failure due to excessive deformation, loss of stability, overturning, rupture or
buckling.

3.6.2

Serviceability Limit State


Serviceability limit state is the state beyond which specified service criteria for a
structure or a structural element is no longer met. In this state, a structure and all
its components mechanically function whilst maintaining prescribed electrical
clearances.

3.6.3

Strength Reduction Factors


The strength reduction factor () takes into account variability of material and
workmanship for structural components used in overhead lines as well as some
modification factors. Table 3.6 gives strength reduction factors applicable to
different components of an overhead line.
Table 3.6 Strength Reduction Factors (as per Table 6.2 of AS 7000)
Strength
Reduction Factor
()

Component of Overhead Line

Limit State

Steel Poles and Cross arms

Strength

0.9

Bolts, Nuts and Washers

Strength

0.9

Untreated wood poles and cross-arms

Strength

0.5

Page 31 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Component of Overhead Line

Limit State

Untreated wood poles and cross-arms

Serviceability

Fully treated wood poles and cross-arms

Strength

Fully treated wood poles and cross-arms

Serviceability

Fittings
and
fabricated/cast

pins,

forged

Strength
Reduction Factor
()
0.3
0.5 to 0.8
0.4

or Strength

0.95

Strength

0.9

Porcelain or glass cap and pin string Strength


insulator units

0.95

Porcelain or glass insulators ( other than Strength


cap and pin string insulator units)

0.8

Synthetic composite suspension or strain Strength


insulators

0.5

Fittings, cast

Synthetic composite line post insulators

Strength

Conductors

Serviceability

Stays

Strength

3.7

Load Combinations

3.7.1

General

0.9 (max design


cantilever load)
0.5 of CBL
0.8

In the design of an overhead line, a range of loading conditions shall be


considered that will provide due consideration for all possible service conditions
that the line and individual supports may be subjected to throughout its service
life. Load factors are used to reflect the uncertainty in the derivation of the
particular load. The value of each load component shall be calculated separately
for each loading condition.
These shall include the potential effects of differential wire tensions across the
structure due to the effects of unequal spans and wind pressures that may exist
at the structure.
Ultimate and serviceability limit state loads are to be considered in determining
structure deflections and strength ratings.
For loadings less than the serviceability limit, the deflections shall be limited to a
value that ensures that electrical clearances are not infringed.

Page 32 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.7.1.1

Permanent Loads
Self weight of structures, insulators, other fixed equipment and conductors
resulting from adjacent spans act as permanent loads.
Vertical loads on poles foundations, cross-arms, insulators and fittings is the
vertical force due to their own mass plus the mass of all ancillaries and
attachments. (Gs).
Vertical loads of conductors/cables and attachments such as marker balls,
spacers and dampers form the design weight span.(Gc)

3.7.2

Load Conditions and Load Factors


The following load conditions and factors shall be used to determine the loading
on structures:
Wn -

wind load based on a selected wind period

Ft - load on structure due to intact horizontal component of conductor tension in


the direction of the line for the appropriate wind load
Gc - Vertical load due to conductors
Gs - Vertical load due to cross-arms, insulators and fittings
3.7.2.1

Maximum Wind and Maximum Weight


Determined by the equation: Wn +1.25 Ft + 1.1 Gs + 1.25 Gc (Table 7.3 of
AS 7000)

3.7.2.2

Maximum Wind and Uplift


Determined by the equation: Wn +1.25 Ft + 0.9 Gs + 1.25 Gc (Table 7.3 of
AS 7000)

3.7.2.3

Everyday Condition (sustained load)


Determined by the equation: 1.1 Ft + 1.1 Gs + 1.25 Gc (Table 7.3 of AS 7000)

3.7.2.4

Serviceability (deflection/damage limit)


Determined by the equation: 1.0 Ft + 1.1 Gs + 1.1 Gc

3.7.2.5

(Table 7.3 of AS 7000)

Failure Containment Load


These loads are as a result of the failure of an adjacent structure. For the failure
containment condition, supports shall be designed for the equivalent longitudinal
loads resulting from conductors on the structure being broken with a minimum
coincident wind pressure of 0.25 times the ultimate design wind pressure (Wn).
The unbalance tension (Fb) resulting from these broken conductors is the
residual static load (RSL) in the aerial phase conductors after severance of a
conductor, or the collapse of a conductor support system. For aerial conductors
supported by suspension insulator strings, an RSL factor of 0.7 must be used,
otherwise 0.8 is used.
The unbroken conductors will be subject to the Intact Conductor Tensions (Ft).

Page 33 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Fb and Ft tensions for conductors are based on the temperature corresponding to


the everyday load condition with a minimum nominal wind pressure of 0.25 times
the ultimate design wind pressure.
Accordingly, total load on a structure is:
0.25Wn +1.25 Ft + 1.1 Gs + 1.25 Gc + 1.25 Fb

Page 34 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.8

Assessing loads on Supports


Before summing the loads, the height at which each load acts must be taken into
account.

3.8.1

Intermediate Pole

.
3.8.2

. 10 + . . . 10

. 0.5

. 10 + .

. 10

Angle Pole
15 ,
+wind on cross-arm +
wind on insulators
2

15, Pc sin
. . 0.5

10 . . . cos
. 10 + . . . 10

. 10 + .

. 10

,
,
3.8.3

Termination Pole

,
Note: See section on stays for crippling load formulae. If an object of significant
area (e.g. transformer, recloser, large insulator) is erected on any pole then the
wind load on that object must be included in the calculation.
3.8.4

Load Referral
Having calculated the loads, they are referred to the pole reference point and
then summed.

3.8.5

Bending Moment
If the pole diameter needs to be determined then the bending moment at groundline must first be calculated.
Bending moment at ground-line
= Load1xhact + Load2xhact + ...

Page 35 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.8.6

Pole Strength
The ultimate tip load capacity of a steel pole must be obtained from the
manufacturer of the steel pole. Poles used by Horizon Power on the distribution
network are provided in Table 4.7.

3.8.7

3.8.8

List of Symbols
A

Angle of horizontal deviation of the line (degrees)

Diameter of conductor (mm)

DG

Diameter at ground-line (mm)

DT

Diameter of Pole at top of pole (mm)

Ch

Height of cross-arm (mm)

Cw

Width of cross-arm (mm)

Ih

Height of insulator (mm)

Iw

Width of insulator (mm)

Height of pole above ground level (m)

hact

Height at which the load acts (m)

href

Height of the reference point of the pole (m)

Sum of adjacent half spans (m)

Pc

Wind load on conductor (Pa)

Px

Wind load on cross-arm (Pa)

Pi

Wind load on insulator (Pa)

Pp

Wind load on pole (Pa)

T(X,Y)

Tension in conductor at XC and Y kPa wind (N)

Distribution Worked Example


Determine the required pole loads and foundation size for a 11 kV/415 V line
in the Kununurra area. Consider a 12.5 m steel pole, with a 15 line
deviation and with a ruling span (RS) of 45 m. Neighbouring spans are 40 m
and 55 m on level ground. The LV ABC conductor is strung to a tension to
approximate the conductor sag in a span of 45 m at 15 C.
NOTE: Although the example is based on a steel distribution pole, the structural
design principles are similar for other materials or support types.

Page 36 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

DESIGN DATA
11 kV Conductor type:
19/3.75 AAC (Pluto) to AS 1531 strung at 5% of CBL at 15C.
Dia

Mass

Area

(mm)

(kg/m)

(mm2 )

(MPa)

(/deg C)

(kN)

18.8

0.576

209.8

65000

0.000023

31.9

Conductor
Pluto

Mod of E Exp Coef

1200

CBL

1200

200

400

11 kV Conductor positions:
Conductor 1:

1.2 m left, 10.2 m above ground

Conductor 2:

above top of pole, 10.6 m above ground

Conductor 3:

1.2 m right, 10.2 m above ground

LV Bracket - ABC

415 V Cable type:


4 95 mm2 LV Aerial Bundled Cable (ABC) to AS/NZS 3560
and strung at 7% of CBL at 15C.
Dia

Mass

Area

Conductor
4/95 ABC

Mod of E Exp Coef

8700

CBL

(mm)

(kg/m)

(mm )

(MPa)

(/deg C)

(kN)

38.4

1.35

380

56000

0.000023

53.2

415 V Cable position:


0.225 m left, 8.7 m above ground
Pole details:
Manufactured to Horizon Power Technical Specification for Fabricated Poles
on the Distribution Network (Initially assume a 16 kN/12.5 m steel tubular
Pole)
Top diameter 125 mm
Ground line diameter 395 mm
Height above ground 10.2 m (i.e. depth in ground 2.3 m)
Cross-arm size: 100 by 150 mm
11 kV insulators are ALP 11/275
The soil conditions are specified in three layers: 0-0.5 m of loose gravel with
sand, 0.5-1.0 m of firm cohesive soil and 1.0 m or more of very stiff cohesive
soil.

CALCULATIONS

Page 37 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

102

Wind Pressure
Kununurra is in Region C and the wind non-directional. Use a wind return
period (RP) of 50 years (Security Level = 1 as per Table 3.1)
Use terrain category = 2.5, as the line is partly in category 2 and partly
category 3 (from Table 3.4)
Use mean conductor height = 10 m,
Height multiplier Mz,cat = 0.945 (use linear interpolation from Table 3.3)
Mt = 1, Md = 1, Ms = 0.85 (clause 3.5.3 note that this clause has since been
changed to M s = 1 following review, although in this example M s = 0.85 has not been
changed )
Regional wind speed V50 = 52 m/s (clause 3.5.3)
Design site wind speed = 52 0.945 0.85 = 41.77 m/s (clause 3.5.3)
Design wind pressure = 1.05 kPa
SRF = 0.92 (clause 3.5.5)
Conductor Loads
Conductor loads under the following conditions can be determined using the
Overhead line simulation program.
11 kV Conductor load
conditions (RS = 45 m)

Temp

Sustained load condition

5C

0 kPa (no wind )

Ft =
1.78 kN

Short duration load condition

15C

1.05 kPa (maximum


wind)

Ft =
5.11 kN

Intact conductor tension under


average wind

15C

0.5 kPa

Ft =
2.94 kN

Failure containment loads (Fc)

15C

0.24 kPa (0.25 x 1.05)

Ft =
2.01 kN

Sustained load condition

5C

0 kPa (no wind )

Ft =
4.16 kN

Short duration load condition

15C

1.05 kPa (maximum


wind)

Ft = 10.48
kN

Intact conductor tension under


average wind

15C

0.5 kPa

Ft = 6.23
kN

Failure containment loads (Fc)

15C

0.24 kPa (0.25 x 1.05)

Ft =
4.47 kN

Wind

Load

415 V Cable load condition


(RS=45 m)

Page 38 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.8.8.1

Ultimate Strength Limit State Assessment (Maximum Wind Load)


Maximum wind load (from any direction) is given by
Rn > Wn + 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.25Ft

(clauses 3.5 and 3.7.2.1)

This requirement must be satisfied for the pole as well as for individual
components such as conductors, cross-arms and insulators. In this example,
only the pole and conductors will be considered.
Gs and Gc are vertical loads. Wn and Ft are transverse loads.
Capacity of 11 kV Conductor
The capacity of the 11 kV conductor must be determined.
Strength factor = 0.5 from Table 3.6, to satisfy serviceability condition
Rn

31.9 kN (CBL for conductor)

Rn

15.95 kN

Conductor short duration load of 1.25 x 5.11 = 6.4 kN, is the highest tension
that the conductor would be subject to, therefore for each 11 kV conductor,
capacity: 15.95 > 6.4, i.e. Rn > load is satisfied.
Capacity of 415 V Cable
The capacity of the 11 kV conductor must be determined.
Strength factor = 0.5 from Table 3.6, to satisfy serviceability condition
Rn

53.2 kN (CBL for 4 95 LV ABC conductor)

Rn

26.6 kN

Conductor short duration load of 1.25 x 10.48 = 13.1 kN, is the highest
tension that the conductor would be subject to, therefore for each 415 V
conductor, capacity: 26.6 > 13.1, i.e. Rn > load is satisfied.
Pole Capacity
Ultimate transverse wind load Wn will comprise wind loads on pole,
conductor/cable and hardware:
wind on pole = 1.3 x 1.05 = 1.4 kPa (Table 3.2)
pole wind load = 1.4 0.5 (0.125 + 0.395) 10.2 = 3.71 kN
acting 4.8 m above ground
wind on cross-arm = 1.4 x 1.05 = 1.47 kPa (Table 3.2)
cross-arm load = 0.1 0.15 1.47 = 0.022 kN acting at 10 m above
ground

Page 39 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

wind on insulators = 1.2 x 1.05 = 1.26 kPa (Table 3.2)


insulator load = 1.26 0.152 0.136 = 0.026 kN each, two acting at
10.2 m above ground and one acting at 10.6 m above ground
wind load on 11 kV conductors = 1.05 47.5 0.92 0.0188 =
0.86 kN each, two acting at 10.2 m above ground and one acting at
10.6 m above ground
wind load on 415 V ABC = 1.05 47.5 0.92 0.0384 = 1.76 kN acting
at 8.7 m above ground
Therefore, taking moments about ground line:
BM

=
(3.71 4.8) + (0.022 10 + (2 0.026 10.2)
+ (0.026 10.6) + (2 0.86 10.2) +(0.86 10.6) + (1.76 8.7)
=

60.8 kNm

Gs will comprise vertical loads due to weight of pole, weight of cross-arms,


insulators and other ancillary hardware. This load is small in relation to the
compressive strength of the pole and will be ignored for this example.
Gc will vary for non-level terrain and unequal adjacent pole attachment
heights, however for equal height poles on flat terrain the conductor vertical
loads are
For each 11 kV conductor: Gc

47.5 x 0.576 x 9.81/1000 = 0.27 kN

For 415 V cable:

47.5 x 1.35 x 9.81/1000 = 0.63 kN

Gc

Transverse
load
due
to
Ft
for
each
11 kV
2 T15C,1.05kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x 5.11 x 0.13 = 1.33 kN

conductor

Transverse load due to Ft for 415 V cable = 2 T15C,1.05kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x


10.48 x 0.13 = 2.72 kN
The total pole base moment can now be calculated as shown below:
The equivalent ultimate load at the top of pole:
BMtot = 60.8 + (1.25 0.225 0.63) +1.5 (2 1.33 10.2 +
1.76 10.6 + 3.58 8.7)
=

158.35 kNm

The equivalent ultimate pole tip load = 158.35/10.2 = 15.52 kN


Strength factor = 0.9 for steel poles. (Table 3.6)
Capacity of required pole 15.52/ 0.9 = 17.24 must be satisfied.
A minimum capacity 24 kN pole is required.

Page 40 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

3.8.8.2

Everyday Load Condition Assessment


Transverse loads with no wind caused by horizontal tension from line
deviation and vertical loads
Load (from any direction) is given by
Rn > 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.1Ft

(clause 3.7.2.3)

This requirement must be satisfied for the pole.


Gs and Gc are vertical loads. Ft is a transverse load.
Transverse load due to Ft for each 11 kV conductor = 2 T15C,0 kPa sin(15/2)
= 2 x 1.6 x 0.13 = 0.416 kN
Transverse load due to Ft for 415 V cable = 2 T15C,0kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x 3.72
x 0.13 = 0.967 kN
The total pole base moment can now be calculated as shown below:
The equivalent everyday load at the top of pole:
BMtot = (1.25 0.225 0.63) + 1.1 [(2 0.416 10.2) + (0.416 10.6)
+ 0.967 8.7)
=

23.6 kNm

The equivalent everyday pole tip load = 23.6/10.2 = 2.3 kNM


Strength factor = 0.9 for steel poles.
Capacity of required pole 2.3/ 0.9 = 2.6 must be satisfied.
A minimum capacity 2.6 kN pole is required.
The pole capacity excluding stay support must cater to this load condition.

3.8.8.3

Serviceability Condition Assessment


Load (from any direction) is given by:
Rn > Wn + 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.1Ft

(clause 3.7.2.4)

This requirement must be satisfied for the pole as well as for individual
components such as conductors, cross-arms and insulators. In this assessment,
only the pole is considered.
Gs and Gc are vertical loads. Ft is a transverse load.
Transverse load due to Ft for each 11 kV conductor = 2 T15C,0.5 kPa sin(15/2) = 2
x 2.94 x 0.13 = 0.77 kN
Transverse load due to Ft for 415 V cable = 2 T15C,0.5 kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x 6.23 x
0.13 = 1.62 kN
The wind load on the pole, cross arm, insulators and conductors can be
determined similar to under ultimate strength limit state assessment using a wind
pressure of 0.5 kPa.
This value = 28.50 kNm (approximately 0.5/0.95 times 54.16 kNm calculated for
ultimate strength limit state).

Page 41 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The total pole base moment can now be calculated as shown below:
The equivalent serviceability load at the top of pole:
=
28.50 + (1.25 0.225 0.63) + 1.1
BMtot
(0.77 10.6) + 1.62 8.7)
=

[(2 0.77 10.2) +

70.44 kNm

The equivalent serviceability pole tip load = 70.44 / 10.2 = 6.9 kNm
If the pole in example is an untreated wood pole, strength factor = 0.3
(Table 3.6)
Strength factor = 0.3 for untreated wood poles with respect to
serviceability.
Capacity of required pole 6.9/ 0.3 = 23.0 kN must be satisfied.
A minimum capacity 23.1 kN pole is required.
However, in the case of a steel pole, a minimum capacity 7.67 kN (6.9/0.9)
pole is required
3.8.8.4

Failure Containment Condition Assessment


Load (from any direction) is given by
Rn > 0.25 Wn + 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.25 Ft + 1.25 Fb
This requirement must be satisfied for the pole as well as for individual
components such as conductors, cross-arms and insulators. In this
assessment, only the pole is considered.
Gs and Gc are vertical loads.
Ft is a transverse load applied to conductors not broken.
Fb is a the residual static load (RSL) in broken conductors in the direction of
the line.
Assuming one side 11kV conductor is broken,
Horizontal load Fb due to broken 11 kV conductor
= T15C,0.24 kPa x Cos(15/2) = 1.6
Transverse load Fb due to broken 11 kV conductor
= T15C,0.24 kPa x 0.8 x Sin(15/2) in the = 0.2
Transverse load Ft due to each unbroken 11 kV conductors
= 2 x T15C,0.24 kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x 2.01 x 0.13 = 0.52
Transverse load due to Ft for 415 V cable
= 2 T15C,0.24 kPa sin(15/2) = 2 x 4.47 x 0.13 = 1.16 kN.
The wind load on the pole, cross arm, insulators and conductors can be
determined similar to under ultimate strength limit state assessment using a
wind pressure of 0.24 kPa.
This value = 13.68 kNm (approximately 0.24/0.95 times 54.16 kNm
calculated for ultimate strength limit state).

Page 42 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The total pole base moment can now be calculated as shown below:
Gs and Gc are assumed to be the same as they are small.
The equivalent failure containment load at the top of pole, in the direction
transverse to the line direction:
BMtot =

13.68 + (1.25 0.225 0.63) + 1.25 [(0.52 10.2) +


(0.52 10.6) + (1.16 8.7) (0.2 10.2) ]k

40.31 kNm

The equivalent failure containment load at the top of pole, in the horizontal
line direction:
BMtot =
=

13.68 + (1.25 1.6 10.2)


34.1 kNm

The transverse direction is therefore the critical direction.


The equivalent serviceability pole tip load = 40.31 / 10.2 = 3.95 kN
Strength factor = 0.9 for steel poles.
Capacity of required pole 3.95/ 0.9 = 4.4 kN must be satisfied.
A minimum capacity 4.4 kN pole is required.
The table below provides the limit state pole strength requirements:
Ultimate
Strength

Everyday load

Serviceability

Failure
Containment

24 kN
Transverse

2.6 kN
Transverse

7.7 kN
Transverse

4.4 kN
Transverse

A 24 kN / 12.5 m steel pole would suffice for all limit state conditions

A 16 kN steel pole would also be suitable to cater to the ultimate


strength requirement with a suitable stay installed in the transverse
direction to counter the tension loads (see example in clause 5.5.1.1).

Page 43 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

SUPPORT DESIGN

4.1

Guidelines
a)

The projected area of cylindrical surfaces shall be taken at right angles to


the wind direction, and no allowance should be made for the shielding of
one conductor by another, but the full area of members of both the
windward and leeward sides of the structure shall be taken as being
exposed to wind pressure.

b)

Intermediate (in line) poles must consider wind loads on the conductors,
pole and all attachments.

c)

Angle poles shall consider wind loads on the pole and all fittings plus
tension loads in the conductors. When designing for the maximum wind
load condition the tension used shall be the tension which is developed in
the conductors under maximum wind load conditions. Also, the pole shall
be designed to withstand sustained tension loads in the conductors under
everyday (still air) conditions.

d)

Terminal poles shall consider:

e)

4.2

I.

in the line direction - the maximum wind loads and sustained load in
the conductors; and

II.

in the transverse direction - the maximum wind loads on the


conductors, poles, stay wire and all attachments.
If the design load calculated for ultimate strength conditions exceeds the
available pole capacity, then a stay shall be installed to counter tension
loads.

Pole Selection
A range of pole sizes is available for use. Each has a specific maximum load
rating as given in Table 4.7. The rating refers to the maximum load that can be
applied at a point 300 mm below the crown of the pole.
Once the total load of the conductor plus equipment (refer to load combinations
in section 3.7) is known then a suitable size pole can be chosen, with a load
rating equal to or in excess of the total load.
Care must be taken to include anticipated (future) additions or modifications that
maybe carried out to the pole structure, to ensure that the correct load rating is
selected.
When selecting a pole of the required size (rating) the following steps must be
taken:
1)

Determine:
a)

type of structure to be erected

b)

conductor type and size to be used

c)

the bay length

d)

all associated fittings to be mounted on the pole

e)

wind speed in region of installation

Page 44 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2)

Determine the loading exerted, by each item (i.e. MV and LV conductors,


pilot cables, luminaries, etc), in all directions including wind loading, and
add them together to obtain the load exerted by all fixings in vertical,
transverse and longitudinal directions.

3)

Estimate pole required for loading determined in step 2.

4)

Repeat steps 2) and 3) for ultimate strength (clause 3.7.2.1), everyday


(clause 3.7.2.3), serviceability (clause 3.7.2.4) and failure containment
(clause 3.7.2.5) conditions.

5)

Determine pole capacity required for each condition required in step 4).

6)

If the total load exceeds the strength of the chosen pole, re-estimate
required pole size and repeat from step 3.

Table 4.7 Distribution Pole Details

Length (m)

4.3

Ultimate Tip
Load (kN)

Pole
Diameter

Pole
Diameter

(mm) Top

(mm) Base

Nominal In
Ground
Depth (mm)

9.5

16

125

330

1.55

11.0

16

125

362

1.70

11.0

24

155

440

1.70

12.5

16

125

395

1.85

12.5

24

155

479

1.85

14.0

16

135

413

2.00

14.0

24

160

517

2.00

Foundation Design
The foundation is called upon to resist the following types of forces:

Uplift

Down thrust

Lateral load

Overturning moment

Foundations for supports may take the form of single foundations in the case of
pole type structures and stay anchors or separate footings for each leg of towers.
The loading on single footings is predominantly in the form of overturning
moment, which is usually resisted by lateral soil pressure, together with
additional shear and vertical forces resisted by upwards soil pressure.

Page 45 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Common types of single foundations are direct buried poles, bored caissons,
mono-bloc footings, pad or raft footings, bored pier foundations, and single pile or
pile group foundations.
When separate footings are provided for each leg the predominant loadings are
compression and uplift forces, however, shear forces should be considered.
Uplift and compression forces are usually resisted by combinations of dead
weight of the foundation bulk, earth surcharges, shear forces and bearing in the
soil. This also applies to guy foundations.
4.3.1

Distribution Pole Foundations


Distribution pole foundations are designed to match the tip load and height of the
pole.
Table 4.7 specifies the sinking or embedment depth of the pole in the ground.

4.4

Pole Position Guidelines

4.4.1

Introduction
These guidelines on pole positions are applicable for average sized, medium
density residential subdivisions (e.g. with average pole spans of 35 to 40
metres).
The guidelines are intended for the positioning of LV (240/415 V), MV (11, 22
and 33 kV) and street lighting poles.
Pole locations in traffic corridors are influenced by factors including traffic speed,
traffic volume, road deviation and traffic calming devices (roundabouts, chicanes,
etc.), embankments (cut or fill slopes) next to the road, frangibility of the pole,
road kerbing and parking.
Poles can be positioned closer to the road where there is a permanent barrier
between the poles and the road. Barriers can take the form of natural items such
as kerbs, trees, rocks and crash barriers such as walls, wire rope, etc.
Frangible poles can typically be positioned closer to the road because they
absorb the impact of the vehicle to a greater extent than non-frangible poles.

4.4.2

Designed Pole Alignment


Horizon Powers distribution poles must be located within the designated 2.4 to
3.0 metre alignment , as shown in Figure 4.2
The pole alignment is laid out in the Utility Providers Code of Practice for
Western Australia and Main Roads Western Australia document utility Services
in Road Reserves available from the website: www.mainroads.wa.gov.au.. Pole
positions must comply with the designated alignment at all times, unless
alternative offsets have been arranged with relevant local authority and service
providers.
Guidance to setbacks and barriers is also provided in:
a)
b)
c)

AS/NZS 1158.1.2
Austroads publications and guidelines for rural and urban road design
AS/NZS 3845

Page 46 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 4.2: - Designated Public Services Alignment

4.4.3

General Considerations for Pole Positioning

4.4.3.1

Maximising Number of Customer Services


Poles should be positioned in such a manner that would maximise the number of
customers serviced from one pole. Typically, around 4 to 6 customers should be
serviced from the same pole.
Note: Customers aerial services are not permitted. Services must not cross other
properties.

4.4.3.2

Street Lighting
Distribution poles should, whenever possible, be positioned to take into account
the street lighting design requirements so that an acceptable level of street
lighting can be achieved.
Location and spacing of street lighting poles and luminaries to achieve the
acceptable level of street lighting must be part of the overall design process.
Refer to Chapter 15 for street lighting requirements.

4.4.3.3

Future Extensions
Consideration should be given to the likelihood/possibility of future extensions to
the existing/proposed distribution network (e.g. requirements for tee-offs,
ground/aerial stays). Figure 4.3 shows an example of how the positioning of the
pole can facilitate the easy construction of the tee-off in future.

Page 47 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 4.3: - Considerations for Future Requirements


4.4.3.4

Advantages by Positioning
Consideration should be given to any advantages that could be achieved by
positioning poles on one side of a street as opposed to the other (e.g. elimination
of customer service poles, reducing likelihood of outages caused by trees in
mains. Figure 4.4 shows the advantage of positioning the poles on the right hand
side of the street to reduce the customer service poles.

Figure 4.4: - Advantage of Careful Pole Positioning

Page 48 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

4.4.3.5

Earthed Poles
Earthed poles such as MV conductive poles, Pole-Top-Switch or Transformer
poles must NOT be located in close proximity to telecommunication assets (e.g.
jointing pits, pillars, man-holes, telephone cabinets) and metallic pipelines
carrying water and gas, unless in accordance with Horizon Powers Standard on
Distribution Lines in the Vicinity of Conductive assets. A Dial Before You Dig
(DBYD) enquiry must therefore be submitted as part of the design process
With earth faults, high step and touch potentials can arise in the immediate
vicinity of earthed distribution structures as the fault current passes through the
earth electrode (particularly those with deeply driven earth electrodes). These
potentials may be of sufficient magnitude to endanger the life of persons or
damage communications equipment near the earthed structure, unless
precautions are taken.
The minimum allowable distances for earthed distribution structures to Telecoms
assets are as recommended in Table A 2 of AS 3835.2:2006 and summarised in
Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: - Minimum Distances to Telecom Assets
Voltage
66 kV
33 kV

Earthing Requirements
No aerial earth wire
With aerial earth wire
No aerial earth wire
With aerial earth wire

Minimum Allowable
Distance
40 m
15 m
15 m
5m

Earthed poles must also not be located close to driveways, frequented public
access ways, etc. A minimum separation of 2 m is recommended to minimise the
risk of damage to the earthing system installed that will lead to the reduction of its
effectiveness.
An example of this is shown in Figure 4.5

Page 49 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 4.5: - Positioning of Earthed Poles

4.4.3.6

Minimising Deviation Angles


Conductor deviation angles should be kept as low as possible to reduce or even
to eliminate the need to install ground or aerial stays.
If large deviation angles are unavoidable, slack spans should be used.
Figure 4.6 illustrates this.

Figure 4.6: - Minimising Conductor Deviation Angles

Page 50 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

4.4.3.7

Proximity to Underground Services


Poles should not be located in positions that prevent or inhibit access to
underground services (e.g. underground power cables, road-crossing conduits,
gas pipes, telephone cables, water pipes).
To a large extent, this can be achieved by keeping strictly to the designated
public services street alignments (as shown in Figure 4.2), referring to maps from
other utilities, in-situ checks, etc. Figure 4.7 illustrates this point.

Figure 4.7: - Proximity to Underground Services


4.4.3.8

Road Intersections
Pole positions at road intersections should be carefully selected to minimise the
reduced visibility to the road users entering or exiting the intersections. This can
easily be achieved by placing poles at the point where the property lot boundary
(not the actual edge of the road) and the pole offset line intersect. This is shown
in Figure 4.8.

Page 51 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 4.8 - Poles at Road Intersections

4.4.3.9

Driveway Crossovers
Poles (including stay poles) should not be located within 1 metre of an existing
driveway crossover .This is shown in Figure 4.9.

Figure 4.9: - Poles near Driveway Crossovers

Page 52 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

4.4.3.10

Easements
Poles (including stay poles) should not be located within the projection of
sewerage, drainage and gas pipe easements existing on a property. This is
shown in Figure 4.10.

Figure 4.10: - Poles within Easements

4.4.3.11

Circuit Overhang
Wherever possible, poles should be located in positions that will avoid circuit
overhang of lot boundaries. If unavoidable, circuit overhang should be kept to an
absolute minimum. This is shown in Figure 4.11.

Figure 4.11: - Minimising Circuit Overhang


4.4.3.12

Stays
Stay (other than aerial stays ) should not bridge existing or likely driveway
crossovers. This is shown in Figure 4.12.

Page 53 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 4.12: - Location of Stay Poles

4.4.3.13

Common Lot Boundary Projection


Poles (including stay poles) should normally be located at the projection of a
common lot boundary . However, lots with narrow road frontages (e.g. battleaxe lots, or those with 10 m or less frontages) should not have poles positioned
in front of them and within 5 m of the projection of their common boundaries.
In the case of battle-axe lots, only underground services are permitted and a
service pillar supplied from the nearest pole should be positioned on the common
lot boundary. This is shown in Figure 4.13.

Figure 4.13: - Location of Poles on Common Lot Boundaries

Page 54 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

STAYS

5.1

General

5.2

1)

Distribution overhead lines should be designed so that the load on stay


components including stay insulators, incorporate the strength reduction
factors in Table 3.6. The stay anchor assembly should have an ultimate
strength reduction factor of 0.4 times the working load of the stay.

2)

The designer should take into account the flexibility of the stays and ground
anchors and the effects of the likely deformation of the pole structure.

3)

A rigid stay is one which will hold the load without allowing the stayed pole
to move sufficiently enough for the pole to carry a significant portion of the
load. A ground stay is considered to be rigid when connected to a steel or
wood pole.

4)

Rigid stays shall be designed to take the full stay load without assistance
from the stayed pole.

5)

Forces in stays shall be calculated by balancing the bending moment at


the base of the pole. This assumes that any imbalance in horizontal loads
is countered by shear forces in the pole.

6)

Stays should be attached as near as possible to the point of application of


conductor loads.

Stay Arrangements
A stay angle to ground of 45 is recommended
However, where space is limited, the angle to ground may be increased to a
maximum of 60. This will increase tension in the stay wire and increase the
downward compressive forces on the pole and its foundation.
Where practicable, ground stays should not be used in frequented areas such as
public roadside footpaths, bicycle ways and livestock forcing areas near
stockyard access ways.
Horizon Power uses two standard stay wires (SC/GZ) 19/2.00 (70 kN CBL) and
19/2.75 (141 kN CBL) in stay assemblies.

5.3

Stay Formulae

5.3.1

Single Stay

5.3.2

Vertical Double Stay

5.3.3

Horizontal Double Stay

Page 55 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

5.3.4

Outrigger Stay
Outrigger stays are generally not recommended and shall not be used on
termination poles. For the design of the outrigger stays, refer to DM# 3739641.

5.3.5

Loads on Poles
Refer to section 3.8 for calculation of bending moment for loads on poles.
The minimum embedment depth for poles with stays should be at least 2 m.

5.3.6

Stay Anchorage
Ground anchors will move to develop the full passive pressure wedge. If the
amount of soil movement has not been specifically determined, a value of
200 mm should be assumed.
It is recommended that ground holding strengths are based on test results rather
than calculations. The standard stay design in the Distribution Construction
Manual includes anchors with holding strengths equal to or greater than the rest
of the stay assembly .
In difficult terrain, such as swampy or marshy ground conditions, special
provision needs to be made for anchoring. A swamp type anchor which provides
a large cross sectional area should be used. Alternatively, where this does not
provide sufficient ground area, stay rods with reinforced concrete block and bulk
concrete should be employed.

5.4

List of Symbols
RMstay

Bending moment support provided by stay

Hs

Height of stay above ground (m)

hs1,hs2

Height above ground of each stay in a vertical double stay (m)

Ts

Tension in stay (N)

AH

Horizontal angle between stay and line of force

AV

Angle between stay and horizontal

Page 56 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

5.5

Worked Example
In the example in clause 3.8.8.1, determine the size of ground stay required if the
ultimate strength requirement is 24 kN and only a 16 kN/12.5 m steel pole is
available.
The pole is self supporting for everyday, serviceability and failure containment
load conditions without stay. (Pole should not fail due to loss of stay under
everyday load)
If ground stay used and attached to the top of pole,
Load required to be supported by stay = 24 kN
Angle of stay = 45transverse and opposing conductor tension loads)
Tension in stay = 24 x 1.414 =34 kN
Component strength factor for distribution stay = 0.8 (Table 3.6)
Ultimate strength of stay = 34 / 0.8 = 42.5 kN select SC/GZ stay wire 19/2.0
(CBL = 70 kN)
Compressive load in pole due to stay = 24 kN
The compressive strength of 300 mm diameter wood poles is typically around
250 kN with higher strength for steel poles. Hence, the compressive load is
generally tolerable. For stayed poles with long length and small diameter, the
buckling failure mode of the pole should be considered.

Page 57 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

INSULATORS

6.1

Insulator Design
Insulators are required to meet electrical, mechanical and pollution withstand
requirements during their lifetime. Electrical stresses include power frequency,
switching and lightning over voltages and mechanical stresses include the
tensile, compressive or cantilever loadings from conductor tension and weight.
Air gap clearance refers to the minimum distance which should be maintained
between the live conductor and earthed metal parts of the support to avoid
flashover. The minimum air gap clearance (refer to table) has to be maintained
even under the conditions of system over-voltages with the insulator strings in
the deflected position due to the action of wind pressure. Two types of over
voltages which can occur on a distribution overhead line are:

6.1.1

power frequency over voltages; and


lightning induced over voltages.

Design for Pollution


For medium voltage lines, the pollution performance of the insulator usually
dictates the amount of insulation required for the particular voltage. When
determining the insulation requirements in a contaminated environment, the
following criteria need to be considered:
a)
b)
c)

Creepage (or leakage) distance


The ability of the material to endure the electrical activity without being
degraded; and
The shape of the insulator to assist in reducing the likelihood of
contamination collection and facilitate washing.

The basic concept is to increase the surface creepage distance so that it is long
enough to prevent a pollution flashover across the surface of the insulator.
Experience has shown that an insulator with an open aerodynamic profile
combined with adequate creepage length will give satisfactory service in most
locations in Western Australia. Details of a suitable profile are shown in
Figure 6.1. Currently polymeric insulators are predominantly used in new
installations due their superior performance in polluted environments. Details
about insulation co-ordination including design for power frequency and impulse
voltages are covered in Chapter 11.
In locations where rainfall is spread throughout the year and aerodynamic profile
insulators are not performing satisfactorily fog profile insulators may be
considered.
6.1.2

Pins
Although pin length may affect electrical characteristics of lines, pins
principally required to meet only mechanical requirements.

Page 58 of 139

are

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 6.1: - Aerodynamic Insulator Profile

6.2

Insulator Strength Limits


In the design of distribution overhead lines, the strength reduction factors in
Table 3.6 must be used to account for the variability of material and
workmanship.

6.3

Insulator Strength Determination


Pin and post insulator manufacturers generally state the maximum design
cantilever load (MDCL) for insulator strength rating. The cantilever load is the
horizontal load applied at the top of a pin or post insulator. Disc insulator strength
requirements are much higher as they need to withstand much higher conductor
tension loads. Insulator strength calculations are detailed in section 6.4.
Table 6.1 specifies the insulator loading conditions, based on Appendix CC of
AS 7000, which is a simplified method of estimating insulator loads.

Page 59 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 6.1 Insulator Loading Conditions


Limit State

Suspension

Post and Pin

Everyday

Weight span, no wind

Weight span, no wind

Serviceability

Resultant load at
serviceability wind

Resultant load at
serviceability wind +
longitudinal unbalance
load

Resultant load for


ultimate conductor wind
transverse load or failure
serviceability wind

Resultant load with


ultimate transverse
wind + longitudinal
unbalance load or
failure containment load

Ultimate

6.3.1

Tension

Ultimate

Standard Insulators
Horizon Power uses Strain and Stand-off Insulators:
Strain 70 kN Strength Rating (creepage -1372 mm and 838 mm options)
Stand-off 6 kN Strength Rating (creepage -1000 mm)

6.4

Insulator Strength Calculations

6.4.1

Example 1
Determine the strength requirement of a tension ceramic disc insulator used on a
33 kV overhead line with 7/4.75 AAC conductor strung at 20% CBL and 15C.
Assume that the span concerned is a termination span in Esperance.
Tension load (ultimate) is the limiting load condition.
Using the limit state strength condition from clause 3.7.3.1 and
900 kPA is the design wind speed for Esperance (Table 3.5)
Maximum conductor tension at 900 kPA = 8.61 kN (from Overhead line
simulation program)
Longitudinal (tension) limit state load = 8.61 x 1.25 = 10.77 kN
Component strength factor for ceramic insulator = 0.8 (Table 3.6)
Minimum required insulator ultimate strength = 10.77 / 0.8 = 13.46 kN
Minimum insulator rating is generally 70 kN, hence disc insulator is suitable.

Page 60 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

6.4.2

Example 2
Determine whether the strength of 11 kV insulators (ALP 11/275) in the example
in clause 3.9.3 is adequate to support the overhead line conductors, installed in
Esperance.
Using the ultimate limit state strength condition (clause 3.7.2.1)
Rn > Wn + 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.25Ft
Design wind speed for Esperance = 0.9 kPA (Table 3.5)
Wind span = 47.5 m
Line deviation angle = 15C
Insulator estimated projected area = 0.02 m2
Insulator drag coefficient = 1.2 (Table 1.6)
Maximum conductor tension at 0.9 kPA = 4.56 kN (from overhead line simulation
software)
Conductor weight = 0.576 x 47.5 x 9.8/1000 = 0.27 kN
Conductor weight multiplier = 1.25
Transverse load on insulator
= (1.0 x wind span x SRF x diameter x 0.9) + (1.0 x 0.9 x insulator projected area
x insulator drag coefficient) + [1.25 x 2 x 4.56 x sin (15/2)]
= (1.0 x 47.5 x 0.92 x 0.0188 x 0.9) + (1.0 x 0.9 x 0.02 x 1.2) + (1.25 x 2 x 4.56 x
0.13)
= 2.22 kN (This is shown in Figure 6.2)
Everyday Load condition check:
Everyday load on insulator
= 1.25 X (No wind tension @ 5 C) X sin (15/2)
= 1.25 x 1.76 x 0.13
= 0.286 kN
Component strength factor for ceramic insulator = 0.8 (Table 3.6)
Minimum required insulator ultimate strength = 2.22 / 0.8 = 2.8 kN
Insulator rating is 6 kN, hence the pin insulator is suitable

Page 61 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 6.2

Page 62 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

CROSS-ARMS

7.1

Allowable Stress Limits


Distribution overhead lines should be so designed that the cross-arm strength
limits in Table 3.5 are not exceeded.

7.1.1

Wood Cross-arms
The allowable stress for seasoned wood cross-arms for in service loads shall be
calculated using the value of Modulus of rupture for dry wood. However,
reference shall be made to AS 1720 for derating factors if the cross-arm has a
higher annual average moisture content than 15%.
For green or partially seasoned cross-arms the allowable stress shall be
calculated using the value of modulus of rupture for green wood in the former
case and an adjusted value in the latter case. Construction loads shall be directly
catered for. To calculate in service loads during the period in which the cross-arm
is seasoning the return periods specified in AS 1170 Wind Loading may be
taken into account and the wind pressure reduced accordingly.
Horizon Power uses the following wood cross-arms as standard:
1)
2)

7.1.2

2.1 x 0.1 x 0.1 m treated hard wood cross-arm


2.1 x 0.12 x 0.1 m treated hard wood cross-arm

Steel Cross-arms
Horizon Power uses the following cross-arms as standard:
1)
2)
3)

7.1.3

1.9 m unitised steel cross-arm


2.4 m steel cross-arm
3.3 m anti swan cross-arm

Standard Cross-arms
Wood cross-arms are used for low voltage only and steel cross-arms for medium
voltages.

7.2

Cross-arm Formulae

7.2.1

Cross-arm Strength

7.2.1.1

Intermediate and Angle Cross-arm:

10
7.2.1.2

Termination Cross-arm

Note: Holes only need to be accounted for if they are between the resisting point
and the point of application of the load.

Page 63 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

7.2.2

Loads on Cross-arms

7.2.2.1

Intermediate
1)

Sustained Load: (5 C no wind)

,
2)

Maximum Load: (two cases)

Case 1: 15C, 0.5 kPa wind

, .

Case 2: 15C, 0.15 kPa wind, pole top rescue (LV cross-arm only)

, .

7.2.2.2

Angle
1)

Sustained Load: (5C, no wind)

,
,
2)

Maximum Load: (two cases)

Case 1: 15C, 0.5 kPa wind

, .
, .

Case 2: 15C, 0.15 kPa wind, pole top rescue (LV cross-arm only)

Page 64 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

, .
, .

7.2.2.3

Termination
1)

Sustained Load: (5C, no wind)


,

2)

Maximum Load: 15C, 0.5 kPa wind


, .

Note: If the termination cross-arm has smaller dimensions than the intermediate
cross-arm then it should be checked for bending moment in the vertical plane.

7.3

List of Symbols
a

Vertical dimension of cross-arm (mm)

Angle of horizontal deviation of line (degrees)

A1, A2

Angles of vertical deviation of adjacent supports (degrees)

Horizontal dimension of cross-arm (mm)

Diameter of hole for insulator pin (mm)

Diameter of conductor (mm)

Height of conductor above top face of cross-arm (mm)

Safe working fibre stress (MPa)

Diameter of bolt hole for the king bolt (mm)

Sum of adjacent half spans (m)

Pc

Wind load on conductor (Pa) being 500 Pa

PEc

Wind load on conductor (Pa) being 150 Pa


(emergency condition)

T(X,Y)

Tension in conductor at XC and Y kPa wind (N)

Gravitational force on conductor (N/m)

WI

Gravitational force on insulator assembly (N/m)

WMG

Gravitational force on man and gear (N/m)

Distance of conductor from centre of pole (mm)

Page 65 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

XPTR
(mm)

Distance of rope or pulley from centre of pole during pole top rescue

7.4

Cross-arm Strength Calculation Examples

7.4.1

Calculating Forces
For the cross-arm in Figure 7.2, using the same conductors and insulators as the
example in clause 6.4.2, analyse the forces on the cross-arm in order to
determine the cross-arm strength requirements.
Using the ultimate limit state strength condition (clause 3.7.2.1)
Rn > Wn + 1.1Gs + 1.25Gc + 1.25Ft

Figure 7.2 Analysis of Forces on Cross-arm

Page 66 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Conductor weight = 0.576 x 47.5 x 9.8/1000 = 0.27 kN


Factored weight of conductor
= 1.25 Gc = 1.25 x 0.27 = 0.338 kN
Factored weight of insulator
= 1.1 Gs = 1.1 x 20 x 9.8/1000 = 0.196 kN
Factored weight of cross-arm
= 1.1 Gs = 1.1 x 1.35 x 0.1 x 01 x 1000 x 9.8/1000 = 0.145 kN
The reaction forces on the cross-arm are shown as R1, R2 and R3 in Figure 7.2.
For static equilibrium to exist:
Horizontal forces = 0
Vertical forces = 0
Moments about king bolt = 0
Moments about king bolt
= +(2.2 x 3 x 0.35)+ (0.534 x [1.2+0.6]) + (0.145 x 0.675) - (0.145 x 0.675)
(0.534 x 1.2) (0.325 x R1 )
R1 = 8.1 kN ( equivalent to a 5.7 kN vertical downwards and horizontal forces)
(note that even if cross-arm and insulator weights are ignored there is only a
slight variation to R1 )
Horizontal forces = 0
(2.2 x 3) 5.7 + R3 = 0
R2 = 12.3 kN
Vertical forces = 0
(0.534 x 3) (0.145 x 2) 5.7 + R2 = 0
R3 = 7.6 Kn

Page 67 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

7.4.2

Example 2
Determine the axial forces, bending moments and shear forces within the crossarm so that a suitable cross-arm can be selected.
The axial forces, bending moments and shear forces are depicted in Figure 7.3

Figure 7.3 Forces on Cross-arm


It can be seen from Figure 7.3 that the maximum bending moment, maximum
axial force and maximum shear occur at the same location, just to the right of the
king bolt.

Page 68 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

CONDUCTORS

8.1

Selection of Conductor
Conductor costs amount to between 20 to 40% of the total cost of an overhead
line, hence their selection is very important. Bare conductors must be selected
considering wire size, shape and material and the following factors:

8.1.1

Electrical requirements: steady state and transient current ratings, corona


discharge, audible noise, radio and television interference, and energy
losses
Mechanical requirements: annealing, drag coefficient, operating
temperature, ease of construction (no bird caging or unravelling),
permanent elongation, fatigue endurance, conductor diameter, strength
and sag
Environmental: corrosion and lightning damage
Economic factors: Life cycle costs

Electrical Requirements
The most important parameter affecting the choice of conductor is its resistance,
as it influences voltage regulation, power loss and current rating. The diameter of
the conductor affects its inductance and thus its capacity.
The steady state thermal current rating of a conductor is the maximum current
inducing the maximum steady state temperature for a given ambient condition
and is based on the conductor heat balance equation: Pj + Ps = Pr + Pc
Where Pj = heating due to conductor resistance
Ps = solar heat gain
Pr = radiant cooling
Pc = natural and forced convective cooling
The steady state thermal current rating must be determined for coincident wind
velocity and incident angle, daily solar radiation, ambient temperature and
conductor surface condition.
The normal (steady state) and short time (emergency) rating of conductors for
summer day and night, winter day and night can be determined by using the
overhead line simulation program. (Refer to Tables 8.13 and 8.14 for standard
conductor ratings).
The emergency rating of a conductor is the maximum current inducing the
maximum steady state temperature for a given ambient condition and occurs
when a step change in current flow results in a short term conductor temperature
change and the
Conductor stored heat = heat gain heat loss
The conductor maximum operating temperature is limited by required minimum
electrical clearances. The time constant for short time ratings is less than 20
minutes.
Factors affecting conductor rating are described below:

Page 69 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.1.1.1

Solar Absorption Coefficient


Solar absorption coefficient refers to the measure of the incident solar radiation
the conductor surface can absorb, ranging from 0 (reflective surface) to 1
(perfectly absorbent surface). Generally 0.6 is appropriate for bright new
conductors and 0.9 for old blackened conductors. Considering service life, a
value of 0.85 may be used in design.

8.1.1.2

Wind Velocity
The rate at which heat dissipates from a conductor is directly proportional to the
wind velocity applied to the conductor. As a standard, a wind velocity of 1 m/s
shall be used to determine the current carrying capacity of a particular conductor.
Increase in wind velocity affects conductor rating significantly.

8.1.1.3

Wind Incident Angle


Wind incident angle affects the magnitude of wind loading on conductors. Wind
loading shall be assessed under worst case conditions by assuming a wind
incident angle perpendicular to the conductors.

8.1.1.4

Temperature
Ambient temperature for Region A is 40 C (summer) and 15 C (winter) and for
Regions C & D 45 C (summer) and 35 C (winter).
Maximum conductor temperature must not exceed 75 C, to ensure that electrical
clearances are maintained.

8.1.1.5

Intensity of Solar Radiation


Conductor rating is inversely proportional to solar radiation intensity. Solar
radiation intensity is typically set at 1000 W/m2.

8.1.1.6

Ground Reflection Factor


This is the ratio of reflected solar radiation to direct incident radiation. It is high for
bright reflective surfaces and is generally taken as 0.2, unless a higher value is
warranted in particular areas.

8.1.2

Mechanical Requirements
When subject to increasing loads, conductors and /or tension fittings may exhibit
at some level, permanent deformation particularly if the failure mode is ductile; or
for wind induced Aeolian vibration, conductors may exhibit wire and/or whole
conductor fracture. This level is called the damage limit and conductors and/or
tension fittings will be in the damaged state if the conductors and/or tension
fittings have exceeded the damage limit.
If the load is further increased, failure of the conductor and/or tension fittings
occurs at a level called the failure limit. The conductors and/or tension fittings will
be in a failed state if the conductors and/or tension fittings have exceeded the
failure limit. These failure limits are illustrated in Figure 8.1 below.

Page 70 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 8.1 Limit States for conductor design (from AS 7000 Figure 4.2)
For bare conductors, the linear model shall be applied by Horizon Power and
accordingly must not exceed 0.5 times conductor CBL for determination of
serviceability. Hence, this will govern the strength limit in distribution line design
(refer also to Table 3.6).
In order to prevent annealing affecting aluminium conductor strength, conductors
must not be operated at a temperature higher than 75C. (Clause 4.2.5 of
AS 7000)
Conductor needs to be erected to an appropriate tension. Higher tensions may
require stronger and more expensive fittings. They may also result in reduced life
of the conductor and its associated fittings due to vibration. Lower tensions result
in lower clearances or the need for taller poles or larger conductor spacing to
enable clearances to be maintained.
On longer spans the tension is normally set at the maximum allowable value in
order to maximise span length and hence realise the lowest cost.
In urban areas spans are limited by the need for service take off points. High
tensions are not required and therefore lower tensions are used in order to
minimise material costs and make construction easier. More information on
applicable conductor tensions is covered in clause 8.4.3.
8.1.3

Environmental Requirements
Table provides guidance on the selection of conductors for differing
environments based on Appendix Y of AS 7000, which should be modified when
required by local experience. For example, for salt spray pollution the relative
distances from the source depend upon the prevailing winds and the terrain.
Generally, a distance of 3-5 km from the sea and salt lakes shall be considered
to be polluted.
Special circumstances such as crop dusting, which has been known to create
adverse effects, should also be taken into account. Crop dusting causes pollution
by foreign particles, which reduces insulation levels that may lead to flashover.

Page 71 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.1 Conductor Selection for Differing Environments


Conductor
Type

Salt Spray Pollution

Industrial Pollution

Open Ocean

Bays, inlets
and salt lakes

Acidic

Alkaline

AAC

Good

Good

Good

Poor

AAAC/6201

Good

Good

Average

Poor

AAAC/1120

Good

Good

Good

Poor

ACSR/GZ

Poor

Poor

Average

Poor

ACSR/AZ

Average

Good

Average

Poor

ACSR/AC

Good

Good

Average

Poor

SC/GZ

Poor

Poor

Poor

Average

SC/AC

Good

Good

Good

Poor

When selecting a conductor for a hostile environment, the following factors should
be considered:
(a)
(b)
(c)

(d)

8.1.4

Full or partial greasing of the conductor significantly improves corrosion


resistance.
Ensure that all fittings are compatible so that electrolytic corrosion does not
occur.
Insulated/covered conductor systems may provide protection against
corrosion provided the conductors are completely sealed at the
insulation/covering and do not provide traps for corrosive solutions nor
allow ingress of moisture; and
The aluminium coating on SC/AC is very soft and should be treated
carefully if it is to provide adequate corrosion protection. The corrosion
resistance of SC/AC is very dependent on the thickness of the coating.

Economic Requirements
As energy is lost when current passes through a conductor, there is an optimum
conductor size to minimise the capital costs and energy loss costs associated
with load transfer.
The challenge is selecting conductors is to avoid over/under design of the
network. Over design is costly in terms of capital investment and is not looked at
favourably by the Economic Regulation Authority (ERA). Under design leads to
high losses, costly investigation and high replacement costs.

Page 72 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.1.5

Conductors Currently Installed in the Network


The principal conductor types currently in the Horizon Power network are:
AAC

all aluminium conductor

AAAC

all aluminium alloy conductor

FEAC

steel conductor aluminium clad

FEGZ

steel conductor galvanised

ACSR/GZ

aluminium conductor galvanised steel reinforced

ACSR/AZ

aluminium conductor aluminised steel reinforced

HDBC

hard drawn bare copper

Table 8.2 shows the ranking of the comparative electrical/mechanical


characteristics of the different conductors that are used for new lines.
Table 8.2- Ranking of Conductor electrical/mechanical characteristics
Conductor Type
AAC
AAAC
FEGZ

ACSR/AZ

Current carrying
capacity

Strength to weight ratio

Notes:
AAC

Has a lower strength to weight ratio and is normally used for


smaller bays in built up areas.

AAAC

Has a higher strength to weight ratio and can be used for


longer bays.

FEGZ

Has a high strength to weight ratio and is used for very long
bays. Due to the comparatively high resistance used only to
feed small loads at end of lines.

FEAC

Has similar characteristics to FEGZ and is used in lieu of FEGZ


in those locations where FEGZ would have an unacceptably
short life due to corrosion.

ACSR/AZ

Where very long bays are required.

ACSR/GZ

No longer used due to inferior pollution performance compared


to ACSR/AZ.

Page 73 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.1.6

Standard Conductors
Only AAC, AAAC, SC/GZ and SC/AC are now purchased as standard
conductors.
ACSR/AZ is also used for special applications. The particular conductor sizes
are;

7/4.75 AAC (1350 - Moon) for short* (urban) MV spans


19/3.25 AAC (1350 - Neptune)
7/4.75 AAAC(1120 - Iodine) for long* (rural) MV spans
19/3.25 AAAC 1120 - Krypton) for long* (rural) MV spans
6/1/3.00 ACSR
95 mm2 ABC ( Aerial Bundled Cable) for general LV use
150 mm2 ABC ( Aerial Bundled Cable) for special LV use
3/2.75 SC/GZ (G-1340)
7/1.60 SC/GZ (G-1820)
3/2.75 SC/AC (G-1340)

*Spans greater than 60 m are considered long spans. Armour rods are to be
used on all spans greater than 80 m.

8.2

Conductor Sag and Tension

8.2.1

Sag and Tension Calculations


The mathematical formula which relates sag to tension is:
S=

L2

(see also section 8.4)

8T
Where S = mid span sag
= conductor weight (N/m2)
L = horizontal span length (m)
T = conductor tension (N)
Factors that affect conductor tension are:
1)
2)
3)
4)
8.2.2

Temperature increase will result in decrease in tension and increase in


sag
Wind increase will result in increase in tension
Age sag may increase over time due to creep
Pole movement stay relaxation may reduce tension and increase sag

Tension Limits
Under the limit state load conditions specified in clause 3.7.2, the tension in a
conductor must not exceed 50% of its ultimate strength (in Table 3.6), under the
temperature and wind conditions specified in Table 8.3.

Page 74 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.3 - Temperature and Wind Conditions for Limit State Loads
Conductor load conditions

8.2.3

Temp

Wind

Sustained load condition

5C

0 kPa (no wind )

Short duration load condition

15C

maximum wind for Region

Intact conductor tension under


average wind

15C

0.5 kPa

Failure containment loads

15C

0.25 times maximum wind for


Region

Conductor Stress and Fatigue


Fatigue failure of overhead line conductors occur almost exclusively at points
where the conductor is secured to fittings. The cause of such failures is dynamic
stresses induced by vibration combined with high static stresses. It is therefore
necessary to limit both the static and dynamic stresses if the conductor is to have
acceptable fatigue endurance and thereby provide required life cycle
performance.
In order to prolong the life of conductors, design tensions are limited to below
50% of CBL. By using appropriate clamping of conductors to insulators static
stresses can be controlled and dampers are used to control dynamic (vibration)
stresses. Table 8.4 indicates recommended maximum horizontal tension as a
percentage of CBL considering both static and dynamic stresses. The following
must be considered in the application of Table 8.4.
(a)
(b)
(c)

(d)
(e)

(f)
(g)

The horizontal tensions are applied at 15C


The table is a guide only, and need not apply to situations where proven
line performance indicates a lower or higher tension as appropriate.
Smaller diameter conductors will vibrate at higher frequencies and reach
their fatigue in a shorter time, however, such conductors are easier to
damp effectively.
Increased span length requires increased vibration protection
Vibration dampers are a purpose built device to reduce conductor vibration
and armour rods are used to reduce damage to conductor caused by
vibration.
For new conductors that are pre stressed, the tension limits in table may be
applied to the after creep (final) tension.
For new conductors that are over tensioned, the tension limits in table may
be applied to the initial stringing tension, especially if the sagging is carried
out over the colder months.

Page 75 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.4 Conductor Everyday Load Horizontal Tension (based on Table Z1,
AS 7000)

Conductor
Type

Recommended incremental Increase in


horizontal tension (% CBL)

Base
Case
tension
(% of
CBL)

Static Stress
Consideratio
ns
Clamp
Category*

Dynamic Stress
Considerations
Damping/Terrain Category
No Dampers

Clamp
Category
A

3,4

Fully
damped all
categories

AAC

18

1.5

2.5

6.5

27

AAAC

15

1.5

2.5

6.5

24

ACSR

17

1.5

2.5

7.5

27

10

2.5

5.0

10

16

31

SC/GZ
SC/AC

Clamp
Category

Terrain
Category

8.2.4

Terrain
Category

Recommended
maximum
horizontal
tension (% of
CBL)

Type A

Short trunnion clamp, post or pin insulator with ties ( without armour rods)

Type B

Post or pin insulator ( clamped or tied) with armour rods or shaped trunnion
clamps with armour rods

Type C

Helically formed armour grip with elastomer insert or helically formed ties
with armour rods
As per Table 3.4

Span Ratios
Large differences in span lengths of adjacent spans can result in significant
tension differences across intermediate structures, which may not be able to be
equalised by the movement of the pole top and may cause ties or pins to fail. In
rural situations adjacent spans are generally limited to a ratio of 1:2. This is not
necessary in shorter urban spans.

8.2.4.1

Wind span
The wind span at a particular structure is the length of span that determines the
transverse load on the structure due to wind action and is defined as one half
the sum of the length of adjacent spans.

Page 76 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.2.4.2

Weight span
The weight span at a structure is the length of span between the catenary low
points on either side of the particular structure and determines the vertical load
due to the weight of conductor at the structure.

8.3

Clearance Requirements

8.3.1

Non Flashover Distances


At structures, the following minimum clearances specified in Table 8.5 must be
maintained from live parts. Clearance requirement is illustrated in Figure 8.2

Figure 8.2 Clearance to Structures Swing Angle

Page 77 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.5: Minimum Clearances to earthed structures


Rated Voltage (kV)

Clearance to earthed structure in mm


Moderate wind

High wind

11

160

100

22

280

130

33

380

180

Notes:
1) For structures with line post or pin insulators, the moderate wind distances
recommended can be used to establish structure clearances.
2) Clearance must be increased in locations where bridging of insulators by
birds or animals is experienced or probable.
3) Moderate wind condition relates to lightning impulse distance and high wind
condition relate to power frequency flashover distance.

8.3.2

Clearance from Ground


At a conductor temperature of 75 C the clearance of a conductor from ground
must comply with Table 8.6.
Table 8.6: - Conductor clearance from ground
Voltage
Not exceeding 1000 V
Exceeding 1000 V but
not exceeding 33 kV

Over
roads

Over other
than roads

5.5 m
6.7 m

5.5 m
5.5 m

Over location not


traversable by vehicles
3 m high
4.5 m
4.5 m

Notes:
1.
2.
3.
4.

If the maximum operating temperature, including overloads will be less


than 75 C for the life of the line then the lesser temperature may be used
down to a minimum of 50 C.
The distances specified are final conditions for conductors which have
aged. When conductors are first erected, an allowance must be made for
settling in and conductor creep. (refer to clause 8.2.3)
The distances specified are designed to protect damage to conductors,
impact loads on conductor supports and protecting vehicles from contact
with conductors.
When calculating ground clearance a construction tolerance of 300 mm
should be included for long bay lengths and 100 mm for short bay lengths.

Page 78 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

5.
6.
8.3.3

For the purpose of this clause, the term ground includes any unroofed
elevated area accessible to plant or vehicles and the term over means
across and along.
The above values are based on vehicles with a maximum height of 4.6 m.

Clearance from Structures


The clearance of a conductor from a structure, building, post or line support
other than a support in the line under consideration must not be less than
stipulated in Table 8.7.
Table 8.7 - Conductor Clearance from Structures Minimum Requirements

Type of Clearance

a) Vertically above any part of


any structure normally
accessible to persons
b) Vertically above any part of
any structure not normally
accessible to persons but on
which a person can stand
c) In any direction (other than
vertically above) from those
parts of any structure
normally accessible to
persons, or from any parts
not normally accessible to
persons but on which a
person can stand
d) In any direction from those
parts of any structure not
normally accessible to
persons

Voltage not
exceeding
1000 V

Voltage
exceeding
1000 V but
not
exceeding
33 kV

Insulated
Service
Cable

3.7 m

4.5 m

2.7 m

2.7 m

3.7 m

0.1 m

1.5 m

2.1 m

0.1 m

0.6 m

1.5 m

0.1 m *

Note: * This clearance may be reduced to allow for termination at the point of
attachment.

Page 79 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 8.3: - Illustration of the application of structure clearances in


Table 8-6

Figure 8.4 Easement Clearances

Page 80 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.3.4

Vertical Spacing of Conductors of Different Circuits


Where conductors of two different circuits:

are on different supports (unattached crossings); or


attached to the same structure; and
one circuit is above the other, the upper circuit at maximum conductor
temperature and the lower circuit at ambient temperature,

the vertical clearances between conductors of difference circuits must not be


less than the distances stipulated in Table 8.8 and Table 8.9 below. Illustrated in
Figure 8.5 and 8.6.
Table 8.8: - Conductor Vertical Minimum Spacing Requirements
(unattached crossings)

Upper Circuit

Not
exceeding
1000 V bare,
covered and
insulated
No
wind
wind

Lower Circuit
Above 1000 V Above 1000 V
and not
and not
exceeding
exceeding
33 kV
33 kV bare or
insulated
covered
No
No
wind
wind
wind
wind

Above 33 kV
and not
exceeding
66 kV bare
No
wind

wind

Not exceeding
1000 V bare, covered
and insulated

0.6 m

0.4 m

Above 1000 V and


not exceeding 33 kV
insulated

0.6 m

0.4 m

0.6 m

0.4 m

Above 1000 V and


not exceeding 33 kV
bare or covered

1.2 m

0.5 m

1.2 m

0.5 m

1.2 m

0.5 m

1.8 m

0.8 m

1.8 m

0.8 m

1.8 m

0.8 m

1.8 m

0.8 m

2.4 m

1.5 m

2.4 m

1.5 m

2.4 m

1.5 m

2.4 m

1.5 m

Above 33 kV and not


exceeding 66 kV bare
Above 66 kV and not
exceeding 132 kV
bare
Note:

The above clearances are based may need to be increased due to local factors,
if required. Moreover, the clearances may need to be increased to account for
safe approach distances required for construction, operation and maintenance
and for blowout on large spans. The wind condition corresponds to serviceability
load condition.

Page 81 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.9: - Conductor Vertical Minimum Spacing Requirements (attached


crossings)

Upper Circuit

Not exceeding
1000 V bare and
covered
Not exceeding
1000 V insulated
Above 1000 V and
not exceeding 33 kV
insulated
Above 1000 V and
not exceeding 33 kV
bare or covered
Above 33 kV and
not exceeding 66 kV
bare
Above 66 kV and
not exceeding
132 kV bare

Not
exceeding
1 kV bare
and
covered

Lower Circuit
Not
Above 1 kV
exceeding
and not
1 kV
exceeding
insulated
33 kV
insulated

Above 1 kV
and not
exceeding
33 kV bare
or covered

Above
33 kV and
not
exceeding
66 kV bare

0.3 m

0.3 m

0.3 m

0.2 m

0.6 m

0.6 m

0.2 m

0.9 m

1.2 m

1.2 m

0.9 m

0.9 m

1.8 m

1.8 m

1.5 m

1.5 m

1.5 m

2.4 m

2.4 m

2.4 m

2.4 m

2.4 m

Figure 8.5 Unattached crossings

Page 82 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 8.6 Attached crossing

8.3.5

Conductors on Same Supports


This section applies to conductors attached to the same support and sharing the
same span to prevent circuit to circuit or phase to phase flashover under
operating conditions.
Where aerial conductors , the voltage of which does not exceed 1 kV, are carried
on the same pole or support as those of a higher voltage the lower voltage
conductors must be placed below the higher voltage conductors.
Any two bare aerial conductors having a difference in voltage with respect to
each other must have vertical, horizontal or angular separation from each other
in accordance with the values required by (1) below, provided that the clearance
at the support or at any part in the span should not be less than the separation
nominated in (2) below (see Figure 8.8).
The separation given by (1) below is intended to cater for out-of-phase
movement of conductors under wind conditions with minimal turbulence. The
separation given by (2) below is a minimum under any circumstances.

Page 83 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 8.7 Conductor Separation


At mid span, as illustrated in Figure 8.7, conductor separation must be calculated
using:
1)

(X2 + (1.2 Y2)) (U 150) + 0.4 (D + i)

Where
X = is the projected horizontal distance in metres between the conductors at mid span;
(X= (X1+X2)/2 where X1 is the projected horizontal distance between the conductors at
one support and X2 is the projected horizontal distance between the conductors at the
other support in the same span.
Y = is the projected horizontal distance in metres between the conductors at mid span;
(Y= (Y1+Y2)/2 where Y1 is the projected horizontal distance between the conductors at
one support and Y2 is the projected horizontal distance between the conductors at the
other support in the same span.
U = is the r.m.s vector difference in potential (kV) between the two conductors when each
is operating at its nominal voltage. In determining the potential between conductors of
different circuits or between an earth wire and an aerial phase conductor, regard
should be paid to any phase differences in the nominal voltages.
k = is a constant, normally equal to 0.4.
D = is the greater of the two conductor sags in metres at the centre of an equivalent level
span and at an average conductor operating temperature with electrical load (50 C in
still air). This may be higher for high temperature conductors.
l = is the length in metres of any free swing suspension insulator associated with either
conductor. Zero for pin and post insulators.

Page 84 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

For the purposes of this clause an equivalent level span shall mean a
span:
a)

which has the same span length in the horizontal projection as the original span;

b)

in which conductor attachments at supports are in the same horizontal plane;

c)

in which the horizontal component of conductor tension is the same as in the


original span.

2)

At the supports or at any point in the span:


For voltages up to and including 11 kV - 0.38 m
For voltage (U kV) exceeding 11 kV

- 0.38 m + 0.01 (U -11) m

Notes:
1)

When conductors of different circuits are located vertically one above the
other, consideration should be given to the need to prevent clashing of
conductors of different circuits under the influence of load current in one or
both circuits.

2)

This clause is not intended to apply to insulated conductors (with or without


earthed screens) of any voltage.

3)

The spacing for covered conductors may be reduced provided the covering
is adequate to prevent electrical breakdown of the covering when the
conductors clash and a risk management strategy is in place to ensure that
conductors do not remain entangled for periods beyond what the covering
can withstand.

4)

Where spacers are used, separation may be less than those specified. It is
suggested that the spacer be taken to be a conductor support for the
purpose of calculating conductor spacing.

5)

The above empirical formula (1) is intended to minimise the risk of


conductor clashing, however, circumstances do arise where it is not
practicable to give guidance or predict outcomes. Some of these situations
involve:
a)

Extremely turbulent wind conditions k to be in the range 0.4 to 0.6

b)

The different amount of movement of conductors of different size and


type under the same wind conditions

c)

Conductor movement under fault conditions (particularly with


horizontal construction).

The following k factors are recommended for overhead power lines which
have phase to phase clearances of 1200 mm or less at mid span:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)

Extremely turbulent wind conditions k to be in the range 0.4 to 0.6


High to extreme bushfire prone areas - k to be in the range 0.4 to 0.6
Under high phase to phase fault conditions - k = 0.4 for fault currents
upto 4000 A, 05 for fault currents 4000 A to 6000 A and 0.6 for fault
currents above 6000 A
Conductors of different mass/diameter ratios and at different
attachment heights k = 0.4 to 0.6

Page 85 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

In all other situations a k factor of 0.4 is recommended.


6)

Mid span clearances may need to be increased in situations where the


conductors transition from horizontal to vertical or where the adjacent
conductors are of different characteristics (diameter, weight) which can
cause out of phase movement.

7)

The following situations may also need to be considered when considering


spacing of conductors but it is not practicable to provide guidance in this
document. Knowledge of local conditions would be required to make
design decisions.
a)

Aircraft warning devices.

b)

Large birds which may collide with conductors, causing them to come
together, or whose wingspan is such as to make contact between
bare conductors and conducting cross arms.

c)

Flocks of birds resting on conductors are known to lift-off


simultaneously, causing violent conductor movement.

d)

Terrain factors that may contribute to aerodynamic lift and/or random


motion

e)

Spray irrigators; and

f)

Safety approach
maintenance

clearances

for

construction,

operation

and

Figure 8.8 Minimum Conductor Separation Attached on Same


Structure

Page 86 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.3.6

Other Clearance
For clearances to the equipment of other authorities and waterways, refer to
Appendix A Clearance to other Authorities and Waterways.

8.4

Formulae

8.4.1

Ruling Span

8.4.2

Sag

8.4.2.1

Supports at Same Level:


(refer to Figure 8.9)

8.4.2.2

Supports at Different Levels:


(refer to Figure 8.9)

8.4.2.3

At any Point X:
(refer to Figure 8.9)

Page 87 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.4.3

Tension

8.4.3.1

Set Conditions:
(refer to Figure 8.9)

8.4.3.2

Varying Conditions:
(refer to Figure 8.9)

8.4.3.3

Checking for Uplift:


(refer to Figure 8.9)

Note: If this expression is negative, then uplift occurs at B.

Note: If uplift occurs an in-line strain pole has to be established at location


B.

Page 88 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 8.9: - Illustration of Variables in Sag and Tension Formulae

Page 89 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.5

Conductor Ratings
There are three primary requirements which must be considered when
determining conductor size:

Thermal rating
Voltage drop limitation
Fault capacity

These are covered individually in this section. For ease of reference, LV network
design is covered separately in Chapter 10.
8.5.1

Conductor Thermal Rating


Overhead lines must be operated at a temperature within its design rating as this
will maintain adequate clearances due to increased sag and prevent permanent
damage to the conductors.
As energy is lost when current passes through a conductor, there is an optimum
conductor size to minimise the capital costs and energy loss costs associated
with load transfer. The table below lists typical conductor types and sizes for
various current carrying capacities.
Table 8.10 - Selection Criteria for Overhead Conductors
Maximum Annual Anticipated Current
Up to 13 amps (0.5/0.75 MVA @ 22/33 kV)
13 to 45 amps (1.75/2.5 MVA @ 22/33 kV)
Over 45 amps

Conductor Type and Size


7/2.50 AAC and AAAC
7/4.75 AAC and AAAC
19/3.25 AAC and AAAC

Note: The above is applicable to both MV and LV networks.


The cost of replacing conductors is high and it is important to select the correct
conductor type and size to avoid the need to re-conductor lines in the future.
Checking with Energy Systems Planning concerning potential load growth may
influence the selection of a suitable conductor.
The conductor ratings (summer and winter) for the three climatic regions in
Horizon Powers operating regions are given in Tables 8.13 (for Region A) and
8.14 (for Regions C & D).
8.5.2

Conductor Fault Rating


The main factors to consider when determining the fault rating of a line are:
1)

the annealing of the conductor resulting from overheating due to the


magnitude and duration of the fault current, and

2)

reduction in electrical clearances (e.g. sagging of the conductor into other


conductors below it, ground clearance )

3)

movement of conductors due to electromagnetic forces leading to


conductor clashing, arcing, conductor damage, secondary faults etc.

Page 90 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.5.2.1

Annealing
Excessive heating of conductors during a short circuit can cause a reduction in
tensile strength and permanent elongation. The permanent reduction in electrical
clearance can reduce the reliability of the line. Failure of the conductor during the
fault or subsequently during adverse weather can cause an outage as well as
damage to the support structures. In the case of steel strands, any loss of
protective zinc coating can lead to corrosion.

8.5.2.2

Maximum Design Operating Temperatures


The design maximum operating temperature is a function of the acceptable level
of permanent loss of tensile strength (annealing) of the conductor. There is a
permanent loss of tensile strength when a conductor operates at an elevated
temperature. The loss of tensile strength results in increased sag. It is
appropriate to establish the maximum design temperature at which a conductor
can operate while maintaining acceptable levels of degradation of tensile
properties.
Recent research indicates that the annealing characteristics of a conductor
depend not only on temperature and time of exposure but also on the diameter of
the wires in the conductor.
The recommended maximum temperature limit for normal operation of AAC,
AAAC and ACSR is 100C as per AS 7000. This permits an approximate loss of
strength of 3% of the original tensile strength after 1000 hours operation at this
temperature.
For emergency ratings, (e.g. when one circuit has to carry more than normal
current for a short time) both the maximum temperature and the duration of the
emergency load should be taken into account in determining the annealing of the
aluminium wires. The annealing effect is cumulative. For example, if a conductor
is heated to 150C under emergency conditions for 24 hours a year for 30 years
it is much the same as heating the conductor continuously for 720 hours. For this
example, the loss of ultimate strength in AAC would be approximately 15%. For
ACSR the ultimate tensile strength loss would be halved due to load transfer
from aluminium to steel with increase in temperature. The steel provides most of
the strength of the conductor and is essentially unaffected by the temperature.
In distribution lines, there is no regular monitoring and load control and smaller
temperature rise margins (up to 75C maximum) is recommended.
Table 8.12 - Maximum Emergency Conductor Operating Temperatures
Conductor Type
AAC, AAAC
ACSR/GZ
ACSR/AZ, ACSR/AC
HDCU
SC/GZ, SC/AC

Cross-sectional
area (mm2)
100
100
300-500
60

Page 91 of 139

Maximum
Temperature
160C
160C
150C
200C
400C

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.5.2.3

Design Issues
a)

Sag under fault


Lower maximum temperatures than listed in the Table 12 may be
necessary in order to prevent a conductor under fault sagging into
equipment below it.
The minimum clearance under fault conditions should be the non flashover
distances specified in Table 8-5.

b)

Movement of conductors under fault


The movement of conductors due to the electromagnetic forces generated
by large short time currents is a complex matter for which a simple
satisfactory solution is not available.

c)

Structure design
By taking these criteria and the degree of reliability required into account a
suitable compromise on structure design, conductor configuration and
economics can be achieved.

8.5.3

Sag/Tension Calculations
There is a separate Sag tension module in the overhead line simulation
software program that can be used for calculations for a particular case.
For the bare overhead conductor system, the standard tensions used for
standard designs are as follows:

8.5.3.1

Short bays (Urban)


In built-up areas, where spans are generally shorter because of residential
service requirements, nominal tension of 10% of CBL for AAC conductor and 7%
of CBL for AAAC is recommended.

8.5.3.2

Long Spans(Rural)
AAC conductor with nominal tension 18% of CBL is recommended for spans in
the 60 m to 105 m range in outer urban areas.
AAAC conductor with nominal tension 18% of CBL is recommended for spans in
the 60 m to 135 m range in rural areas.
For very long spans up to 250 m in rural areas, SC/GZ or SC/AC conductor with
nominal tension 25% of CBL is recommended.

Page 92 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.13: - Overhead Conductor Ratings (Region A)


Conductor
6/1/2.50
6/1/3.00
6/1/3.75
6/4.75-7/1.6
7/2.50
7/3.00
7/3.75
7/4.5
7/4.75
19/3.25
7/2.5
7/3.0
7/4.75
19.3.25
7/2.5
7/3.0
7/4.75
19/3.25
7/0.064
7/0.08
7/0.104
19/0.064
7/0.136
19/0.083
19/0.101
7/1.6
3/2.75
3/2.75

ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
SC/GZ
SC/GZ
SC/AC

Diameter
(mm)

Summer
Rating
(amps)

7.50
9.00
11.30
14.30
7.50
9.00
11.30
13.50
14.25
16.30
7.50
9.00
13.50
16.30
7.50
9.00
13.50
16.30
4.89
6.00
7.92
8.15
10.35
10.55
13.00
4.88
5.93
5.93

158
196
254
334
172
215
281
348
371
428
171
217
366
422
166
207
356
415
134
171
241
245
332
334
430
42
45
70

Winter
Rating
(amps)
218
272
354
471
237
297
392
489
522
606
235
301
516
598
228
286
500
588
183
235
333
338
462
465
603
58
62
96

Ambient Temperature: 40 C (summer); 15 C (winter)


Wind Speed: 1.0 m/s
Max. Conductor Temperature: 75 C

Page 93 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 8.14: - Overhead Conductor Ratings (Region C & D)


Conductor
6/1/2.5
6/1/3.0
6/1/3.75
6/4.75-7/1.6
7/2.5
7/3.0
7/3.75
7/4.5
7/4.75
19/3.25
7/2.5
7/3.0
7/4.75
19.3.25
7/2.5
7/3.0
7/4.75
19/3.25
7/0.064
7/0.08
7/0.104
19/0.064
7/0.136
19/0.083
19/0.101
7/1.60
3/2.75
3/2.75

Diameter
(mm)

Summer
Rating
(amps)

7.50
9.00
11.30
14.30
7.50
9.00
11.30
13.50
14.30
16.30
7.50
9.00
14.30
16.30
7.50
9.00
14.30
16.30
4.89
6.00
7.92
8.15
10.35
10.55
13.00
4.88
5.93
5.93

145
179
230
303
161
201
263
326
332
382
159
198
340
395
151
188
323
376
123
157
220
223
302
304
390
38
41
62

ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
ACSR/AZ
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAC
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 1120
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
AAAC TYPE 6201
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
HDBC
SC/GZ
SC/GZ
SC/AC

Winter
Rating
(amps)
177
220
286
380
197
247
326
406
406
470
194
243
424
497
184
231
403
464
148
190
269
273
373
375
486
46
50
74

Ambient Temperature: 45 C (summer); 35 C (winter)


Wind Speed: 1.0 m/s
Max. Conductor Temperature: 75 C

Page 94 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

8.6

List of Symbols
a

distance from lowest point of conductor to lowest support (m)

cross sectional area of conductor (mm2)

angle of elevation or depression between supports (degree)

distance from lowest point of conductor to upper support (m)

sag of conductor below lowest support (m)

greater of the two conductor sags at the centre of an equivalent level span
and at a conductor operating temperature of 50C in still air (m)

Modulus of Elasticity (Pa)

difference of elevation of supports (m)

hA

difference of elevation between supports A and B (m)

hC

difference of elevation between supports C and B (m)

Coefficient of Linear expansion (per C)

span length (m)

LT

length of conductor (m)

LA

length of span between supports A and B (m)

LC

length of span between supports C and B (m)

length of any freely swinging suspension insulator associated with either


conductor (m)

difference of elevation of conductor at lowest point and at mis-span

sag at mid-span

SX

vertical distance below top support and any point 'X' (m)

tension in conductor (N)

TA

tension in conductor between supports A and B (N)

TC

tension in conductor between supports C and B (N)

t1

conductor temperature at initial conditions (C).

t2

conductor temperature at second set of conditions (C).

T1

tension at initial conditions (N)

T2

tension at new temperature and/or load per unit length (N)

r.m.s vector difference in potential between the two conductors when each
is ting at its nominal voltage (kV). In determining the potential between
conductors of different circuits, regard should be paid to any phase
difference in the nominal voltages

gravitational force on conductor (N/m)

WA

gravitational force per unit length on conductor between supports A and B


(N/m)

Page 95 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

WC

gravitational force per unit length on conductor between supports C and B


(N/m)

W1

load on conductor per unit length at initial conditions (N/m)

W2

load on conductor per unit length at standard set of conditions (N/m)

horizontal distance in span from top support to point 'x' (m)

Projected horizontal distance between the conductors at mid-span (m)

Projected vertical distance between the conductors at mid-span (m)

Page 96 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

VOLTAGE REGULATION

9.1

Voltage Tolerance Limits

9.1.1

Statutory Voltage Tolerance Limits


Horizon Power declares the voltage level at a customers point of supply as
within 6% of the nominal 240 V single phase and 6% of the nominal 415 V
three phase.
As such, the maximum and minimum phase-to-neutral voltage levels at any
point of supply on the LV network shall be within 225 V and 254 V for single
phase supplies and within 390 V and 440 V for three phase supplies (under
normal network conditions).
In accordance with AS 61000.3.100 2011, Horizon Power expects to adopt the
new voltage standard 230 V +6%, -10% for single phase and 400 V +6%, -10%
for three phase supplies sometime in the future.
When planning and designing a residential distribution network, the designer has
to ensure that the voltages at any point of supply on the network will be within the
statutory voltage tolerance limits, under normal network conditions.

9.1.2

Voltage Drop Criteria


Impedance in each of the following components of the distribution system leads
to voltage drop:
1)

Medium Voltage Feeder;

2)

Distribution Transformer;

3)

Low Voltage Network;

4)

Customer Service Leads/Cables.

After a distribution system has been constructed, there are only two locations
where voltage levels can be adjusted:
1)

at the zone substation (bus-bar voltage set-point and the use of Line Drop
Compensators), and

2)

at the distribution transformers (off load tap changers).

It is therefore important that the non-adjustable parts of the system be designed


adequately to fully utilise the voltage control equipment at these locations to keep
the customers voltages within the statutory voltage tolerance limits.
Table 9.1: - Voltage Drop Limits with respect to nominal voltage
Non-Adjustable System
Components
Medium Voltage Feeder
Distribution Transformer
Low Voltage Network
Customer Service Cable

Page 97 of 139

Maximum Voltage Drop Limits


5.0%
4.0%
5.0%
2.0%

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Thus to compensate for voltage drops caused by components in Table 9.1, the
Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), Line Drop Compensator (LDC) and
distribution transformer taps are set accordingly.
With a 2% voltage drop assumed for customer service cables, coincident
voltage drops, when taken together with zone substation LDC Buck/Boost and
distribution transformer tap options are considered a reasonable balance to
achieve a customers voltage at the meter panel between 6% of the nominal
240 V.
Maintenance and Emergency Voltage Limits are shown in Table 9.2.
9.1.3

Effect of Different Load Cycles


The majority of customers in a typical area will have similar, normal load
patterns. Some, however, will have load patterns which vary and in extreme
cases could be completely opposite to the normal pattern.
These are usually single customer loads. Such loads of relatively small
magnitude with respect to the total feeder load (or of relatively large magnitude
with respect to the total distribution transformer load) can be catered for by
adjusting the tap settings on the transformer supplying the load.
Instances could also arise where a particular MV feeder load profile becomes
dominant and masks the normal load profile of the remaining feeders on the
zone substation. Such a feeder could influence the response of the LDC, to the
detriment of the remaining feeders and their individual loads. This problem falls
into network load modelling and is not dealt with in this manual.

9.1.4

Voltage Drop Limits for LV Networks


One of the voltage drop criteria is that the maximum allowable voltage drop limit
for the LV network is 5.0%. This translates to a phase-to-neutral voltage drop of
12 V between the transformer LV terminals and the Point of Supply of any load
on the network. This limit, however, applies for normal or steady state conditions.
In general, the network designer shall ensure that the design of the network
conforms to the voltage drop limits shown in Table 9.2.
Table 9.2 - Maximum Voltage limits for LV Networks
Condition
Normal or Steady State
Maintenance
Emergency

Voltage Limits (Phase to Neutral)


%
Volts
Max (V)
Min (V)
5.0
12
252
228
7.0
17
257
223
9.0
22
262
218

When designing the network, maintenance or emergency conditions must also


be considered. Interconnection with adjacent networks is necessary to maintain
the supply.

Page 98 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

9.1.5

MV Voltage Regulation

9.1.5.1

Design Approach
The design approach is generally as follows:

9.1.5.2

(a)

Determine loads for maximum, lightly loaded and maintenance conditions.

(b)

For least cost option, check that voltage remains within limits for the
various loads.

(c)

If voltage goes outside limits try various options.

(d)

Compare options to determine optimum solution.

Computer Modelling
In many instances the line electrical data is entered into a suitable computer
program for analysis such as Horizon Powers Power Factory (Digsilent)
program. This calculates the voltage variations for each option. The designer still
needs to compare the options.

9.1.5.3

Voltage Control Equipment


Some voltage control is built into the standard system equipment as follows:
(a)

Distribution Transformers:
Out of service manual tap changes of 2.5% and 5%.

(b)

Zone Substation Transformers:


Typically 10%, 13% or +10 - 20%.

In urban areas it has been standard practice to utilise the above two measures
only and choose appropriate conductor sizes and distribution transformer
location/quantity to provide satisfactory voltage regulation. These are covered in
the Chapter 10 on LV Network Design.
Where longer lines are used it can become uneconomic to increase the
conductor size. Additional forms of MV voltage control may become the lowest
cost option.
The three options usually considered are as follows:
a)

Capacitors -typically used for lines of moderate length


(effective when permanently in service)

b)

Reactors - typically used for very long lightly loaded lines


(effective when permanently in service)

c)

Regulator - can be used to raise or lower voltage


(output voltage varies to suit load conditions)

Page 99 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

9.1.5.4

Calculating MV Voltage Drop


Two methods may be used to calculate the voltage drop :
a)
b)

Short line method which is much simpler than the long line method
because it ignores capacitance.
Long line method which takes the capacitance of the line into account.

For MV lines 33 kV or below and less than about 80 km in length, the effect of
capacitance is negligible and the short line method for calculating voltage drop is
generally applied as in the example below.
When determining the relationship between voltages and currents on a threephase system, it is convenient to treat them on an equivalent single phase basis
for simplicity. The voltages are given from line to neutral, the current for one
phase, the impedances for one conductor and the equations written for one
phase.
The three phase system is reduced to an equivalent single phase circuit as
shown below.

Figure 9.1: - Equivalent Single Phase Circuit of MV Line


The effect of a lagging or leading power factor is shown vectorially in Figure 9.2.

Figure 9.2: - Effect of Lagging and Leading Power Factor

Page 100 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The symbols used are as follows:


R

Resistance in ohms per km (for single conductor);

Reactance in ohms per km (for single conductor);

Vs

Sending end voltage (phase to neutral);

Vr

Receiving end voltage (phase to neutral);

Current in amps per phase;

Phase angle difference between voltage and current vectors


(Power factor = cos )

It is normal operating practice to endeavour to keep the sending end voltage


constant and to allow the receiving end voltage to vary according to the load
demand.
The receiving end voltage is given approximately by:

The regulation (across the MV line) is given approximately by:


%
%

9.1.5.5

Worked Example
A three phase 22 kV line, 80 km long is required to deliver a load of 630 kVA with
a 0.8 p.f. (lagging). The conductor to be used is 7/4.75 AAAC. Determine the
regulation of the line
Ip = P (3 Vs cos ); i.e.
Ip = 630,000 (3 22,000 0.8) = 20.7 A
Resistance per conductor:
RA = 0.3210 /km 80 km = 25.68 ohm (from conductor manufacturer tables)
Reactance per conductor:
XL = XA + XD
XA = 0.2898 /km (from conductor manufacturer tables)
For a 22 kV country line, the spacing factor (XD) = 0.0857 ohm/km.
Hence, XL = (0.2898 + 0.0857) /km 80 km = 30.04 ohm.
Receiving end phase voltage:
Vr = Vs - (Ip RA cos + Ip XL sin ), i.e.
Vr = 22 3 - (20.7 25.68 0.8 + 20.7 30.04 0.6) 1000
i.e. Vr = 11.9 kV (phase to neutral); or
i.e. Vr = 3 11.9 = 20.61 kV (phase to phase)

Page 101 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Hence, the regulation is:


Regulation = (Vs - Vr) Vnominal 100%, i.e.
Regulation = (22.0 - 20.90) 22.0 100% = 6.3%

9.2

Line Drop Compensators (LDC)


The Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs) installed in all zone substations and
most voltage regulating transformers are equipped with Line Drop Compensators
(LDCs).
LDCs serve to provide a voltage boost at the zone substation busbars in
proportion to the load current. For a given MV feeder (modelled as shown in)
Figure 9.3, the voltage drop across the feeders is proportional to the load
current.
If the voltage at the receiving (load) end of the feeder, Vr, is to be maintained at a
fixed value, then the voltage at the sending (zone substation) end, Vs must be
raised or lowered in proportion to the feeder voltage drop.
The voltage drop across the variable resistor and reactor in the LDC essentially
mimics the voltage drop in the MV feeder and provides the correct signal to the
AVR so that the transformer tap setting can be raised or lowered accordingly.
By suitable adjustment of the LDCs variable resistor and reactor (which will
depend on the outgoing MV feeders characteristics), it is possible to obtain
constant voltage at some distant point on the feeder, irrespective of the size of
the load current or power factor.
Figure 9.3 shows the basic principle behind the LDC

Page 102 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 9.3: - Principle of Operation of LDC

Page 103 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The voltage drops across the LDCs resistor and reactor are added to the voltage
on the output side of the voltage regulating transformer with the correct phasing.
The voltage regulating relay balances at one voltage only (the setpoint voltage).
The LDC is configured and adjusted so that an increase of load current causes a
lowering of the voltage across the voltage regulating relay (VRR). The voltage
regulating relay in turn then impulses the tap changer to raise the transformers
output voltage until VRR is again equal to the setpoint voltage.
In order to adjust the LDC, the ratio of the main CT and VT as well as the specific
feeder impedance must be known. In practice, the settings of the LDC are
usually compromise values since most voltage regulating transformers are
connected to several outgoing feeders, each with different load characteristics,
conductor types, line constructions and line lengths.
The instruction manual pertaining to the particular LDC concerned should be
referred to for more detailed information on the operation and adjustment of the
LDC.

Page 104 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

10

LV NETWORK DESIGN

10.1

Introduction

10.1.1

General
The LV (240/415 V) distribution system is really the business end of Horizon
Powers operations. It is the point in Horizon Powers electricity system where the
majority of customers receive their supply.

10.1.2

Primary Aim
The primary aim when designing a LV residential distribution network is to
ensure that it will adequately service the estimated customer loads both now and
in the future. This must be done for the minimum economic cost, while ensuring
the network satisfies both reliability and quality of supply standards that are
governed by the Electricity Industry (Network Quality and Reliability of Supply)
Code 2005.

10.1.3

Challenge for Network Designers


The LV network is the most extensive component in the distribution system and
accounts for a large proportion of Horizon Powers capital expenditure. It is also
responsible for a large proportion of system losses and customer complaints. Yet
it does not always receive the engineering/technical attention it deserves.
The challenge of any residential network designer is to avoid over/under design
of the network. Over design is costly in terms of capital investment and is not
looked at favourably by the Economic Regulation Authority (ERA). Under design
leads to high losses, costly investigation and rectification of Quality of Supply
related complaints.
Extra effort expended in optimising the design of LV networks results not only in
the efficient utilisation of capital costs but also impacts on the MV network,
affecting the number and location of distribution transformers.

10.1.4

Use of Computer Packages


Typically, the design studies and calculations are carried out using specially
written computer programmes, for the more complex cases or where accurate
results are required. Alternatively, manual calculations can sometimes be used,
especially for simpler cases or where only estimates are required.
LV DESIGN is a PC based computer program, written specifically for studying LV
networks. It is particularly suited for residential estate design, with distributed
loads along the LV feeder. The program automatically accounts for load
unbalance and diversity.
However, it can also be used to calculate the voltage drops and line currents
caused by large commercial loads. LV DESIGN can be used to investigate the
impact of new large loads within residential estates, e.g. shopping centres,
pumps, etc.

Page 105 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

GIS (Geospatial Information System) is one of Horizon Power's prime computer


systems. Various distribution plant items are recorded in the system for most
parts of the state, e.g. transformers, MV and LV conductors, poles, and many
others. Customer property boundaries are also recorded in the GIS database.
GIS can be used by the designer to obtain information quickly about the existing
supply system around a new proposed installation, from which, various supply
alternatives can be considered.
GIS can also be used to down-load information on the supply system onto Power
Factory (Digsilent) for later analysis.
The electrical and other principles used in the computer packages are briefly
outlined in clause 9.1.5.
10.1.5

Aspects of Electrical Design


The electrical design of LV distribution feeders generally involves the following
aspects:
1)

Adherence to voltage tolerance limits;

2)

Estimation of load demands;

3)

Selection of distribution transformer;

4)

Planning of LV network layouts;

5)

Calculation of Voltage Drops and Line Currents;

6)

Selection of LV conductor sizes to satisfy the voltage drop and line current
requirements; and

7)

Selection of LV fuse/protection device (if applicable).

These aspects are explained in the following sections.

10.2

Determination of Recommended Load Demand Values

10.2.1

Introduction
The current or power flowing from the electricity supply system to an installation
at a particular time is known as the electrical demand . Variations of demand
occur frequently in domestic installations as individual loads are switched on and
off. In a given period, say 24 hours, there will be one value of demand that is
higher that all others - this is the maximum demand for that period.
Maximum demand is the all important parameter in system design because this
value directly determines component sizes (e.g. conductors, transformers),
voltage drops, line currents and ultimately the cost of servicing the loads.
The fluctuating nature of electrical loads, particularly that of residential peaks,
makes the measurement of instantaneous demand difficult, and sometimes,
undesirable. System components are rated in terms of their thermal (overload)
capacity and thus their average demand over a period of, say, 15 minutes is far
more meaningful than the moment by moment fluctuations which actually occur.
For this reason the demand on electrical equipment is often obtained by the use
of special instruments (e.g. load data-loggers) which can provide an average
reading for a certain period. The information provided by this type of meter is
often employed in system design.

Page 106 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Subject to predefined conditions, maximum demands can be measured, adjusted


and projected to become the basis of design for new systems. While easily
understood in principle, maximum demand can be expressed in various terms
and measured in various ways. Unless these aspects are fully understood and
appreciated, confusion and inaccurate design may result.
The simplest and most common unit of maximum demand is active conductor
current, but it is not uncommon to see kVA quoted instead of amps. Other
examples include the use of kW (which requires the prevailing power factor to be
known), After Diversity Maximum Demand values (ADMD , in kVA), kVA/hectare
type figures.
10.2.2

Effect of Load Diversity on Maximum Demand


The peak load of any installation is characterised by the demand fluctuations
from the switching in and out of appliances within the installation. It is improbable
that every appliance will impose its maximum demand at the same instant. As
such, the maximum demand of the installation is generally less than the sum of
the individual maximum demands of all the appliances within that installation.
Similarly, the maximum demand of a LV feeder is characterised by the demand
fluctuations from the varying load demands of all the loads on the feeder. The
maximum demand of the feeder will generally be less than the sum of the
individual maximum demands due to the diversity between the loads.
It is conceptually possible that if the average maximum demand of a typical
load in a group is known, then the maximum demand for the whole group can be
obtained by simply multiplying the average maximum demand of this typical load
by the number of loads and also by an appropriate multiplication factor chosen
for that particular number of loads.
This multiplication factor is commonly referred to as the diversity factor . Used
in conjunction with the number of loads, the diversity factor scales the average
demand of a typical load within a group, to the maximum demand for that
group of loads.

10.2.3

Determination of Design Load Demand Values


The maximum demand on a residential substation, when divided by the number
of loads supplied, provides a value which is in essence the average contribution
per customer to that maximum demand, or simply the average demand for a
typical customer. The larger the number of customers involved, the nearer to its
ultimate value will be this average demand.
For practical purposes, groups of 60 or more loads are considered to produce a
figure sufficiently close to the ultimate for it to be considered as the After
Diversity Maximum Demand or ADMD.
Because the load ADMD is the all important basis of residential distribution
design, this matter must receive full and careful consideration, concerning its
value at the initial loading of the system, the provision for future growth and the
repercussions of having to alter the system as a result of a poor choice of design
ADMDs.

Page 107 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Among the factors influencing the choice of the ultimate design ADMD values
are:
1)

Limited capital resources;

2)

Apprehension concerning the future;

3)

Penetration of natural gas in traditionally all-electric areas;

4)

Climatic, socio-economic and/or geographic influences;

5)

Load growth, changing standard of living;

6)

Trend towards more efficient appliances/equipment; and

7)

Tariff structure.

Whatever the ultimate design ADMD figures are, the designer must endeavour to
ensure that the system is not under/over designed for the reasons given in
clause 10.1.3.
Optimum design requires optimum choice of ADMD. In most cases, a designer
has to make a value-judgement as to what value of ADMD is most appropriate
for the particular distribution system, after having considered all relevant issues.
For most instances, the load demand can be estimated based simply on the
designers previous experience with similar developments. However, careful
thought must still be given to this crucial design parameter for each residential
development, rather than simply using highly conservative standard values.
It is not uncommon for a designer to find himself/herself in the position of having
to be a mixture of an engineer, an economist and even a prophet at the same
time!
10.2.4

Application of After Diversity Maximum Demand (ADMD)


The after diversity maximum demand (ADMD) electrical loading values must be
used when carrying out overhead and underground distribution network design
for various customer classes within Horizon Powers area.
The ADMD values have taken into account seasonal climatic, location and
community factors to ensure that adequate capacity is installed for the normal life
of Horizon Powers electrical network assets while ensuring statutory
requirements and customer expectations are met in a cost effective manner.
The values of ADMD to be used at a customer level have been based on
assessments of load growth patterns experienced in Horizon Powers regional
areas, together Western Australian statutory requirements.
ADMD is the basic electrical load, on a per customer basis, used in the design of
Horizon Powers electrical distribution network. It represents the maximum
demand, measured at a distribution substation, where there are more than 60
customers in total connected to that substation.

Page 108 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

10.2.5

Residential Load ADMDs


ADMD values for residential loads are provided in Horizon Power document
HPC-3DC-07-0001-2012 (Information Electrical Design for Distribution
Networks: After Diversity Maximum Demand). While the ADMD values are
applicable only to standard sized lots, there may be cases where the actual
ADMDs could be even higher than these values (e.g. for larger lots, beach front
houses, riverside lots, canal developments, etc.). Similarly, it may be necessary
to reduce the recommended ADMD values. Changes to recommended ADMD
values must, at all times, be made in consultation with the technical staff in the
relevant Regional Area office prior to the design being carried out.
Since these ADMD values have a sense of averageness about them, they must
be scaled up to obtain the maximum demand for a group of loads before the LV
feeder can be designed. The scaling of the ADMD values is automatically taken
into account in Horizon Powers Voltage Drop and Line Current formulae.

10.2.6

Non-Residential Load Demands


As mentioned earlier, maximum demand values are expressed in a variety of
ways, e.g. amps, kVA, kVA/hectare, kW etc. The following load demand values
for non-residential loads are a mixture of average demand type figures
(kVA/hectare figures) as well as maximum demand type figures (kVA, kW, hp
etc. figures).
Typical design load demand values for non-residential loads are as follows:
1)

High Schools: 220 kVA;

2)

Primary Schools: 82 kVA;

3)

Neighbourhood Shopping Centres: obtain the load kVA based on an


average load density of 200 kVA/hectare. (Alternatively, enquire from
consultant or measure maximum demand);

4)

Large Shops/Business Centres: enquire from consultant;

5)

Pumps and other large 3-phase fixed equipment: obtain full load kVA from
equipment name-plate or specifications;

6)

Small Shop Groups: 200 kVA/hectare;

7)

Light Industrial Lots: 100 kVA/hectare.

More information is available in Horizon Power document HPC-5DC-07-0032012 (Distribution Design Manual Volume 3 Supply to Large Customer
Installations).
10.2.7

Residential Lot Classification


Some lots have an Rn classification (e.g. R25, R30). This classification relates
to the density of houses on the lot. The n index refers to the Number of
Units/hectare, so that an R25 lot classification refers to 25 units per hectare.
Since 1 hectare = 10 000 m2, each unit on a R25 lot would occupy approximately
(10 000 25) m2 = 400 m2.
The number of units in a given Rn lot of area, A (m2), can then be calculated as
follows:

Page 109 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

No. of Units = A (m2) n 10 000


For example, if an R25 lot has an area of, say, 4898 m2, the number of units in
the lot would be 4898 25 10 000 = 12 units.
10.2.8

LV Conductor Selection Guidelines


The size of the LV conductor is chosen to ensure that all of the following criteria
are satisfied:

10.2.9

1)

Voltage drops during peak network load times being within maximum
allowable limits (and during minimum load times being within minimum
allowable limits);

2)

Conductor current carrying capacity being adequate so that load currents


will be within the capacity, not only during steady state conditions, but
during maintenance/emergency conditions when the LV network is
interconnected with others;

3)

Other conductor current ratings (e.g. summer, winter) not being exceeded,
wherever applicable;

4)

Conductor impedance satisfying the LV fuse/protection requirements (so


that at times of fault at the end of the feeder, the fault current will be large
enough to be seen by the LV fuse and hence, cleared in time to prevent
damage to the conductor).

LV Conductor Data Table


Horizon Powers preference is to underground the network as far as possible.
However, due to financial considerations and higher capital costs overheads
networks will continue to be built. New LV ABC only installations must be
constructed using a combination of 95 mm and 150 mm LV ABC.
However, LV ABC will also be used to upgrade existing bare overhead systems.
Therefore, it is essential that the designer has a table of conductors covering not
only LV ABC but other commonly used LV conductors to assist with the design
(e.g. when calculating voltage drops, checking current rating violations or
checking LV fuse/protection requirements).

10.2.10

Selection of LV Feeder Routes


When selecting LV feeder routes, the designer should take the following into
account:

10.2.10.1 Proximity to Loads


The feeder route should be chosen such that it will start to be loaded as close
to the transformer as possible. This is facilitated by locating the transformer as
close to heavy load centres as possible or as close to the centre of gravity of a
group of loads.
Feeder routes where the feeder only picks up loads after a considerable
distance away from the transformer should be avoided (as this causes larger
voltage drops than necessary in the initial part of the feeder).

Page 110 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

10.2.10.2 Utilisation/Loading
Pole Top Transformers in the overhead system are usually located on in-line
poles, rather than on corner poles to avoid complications during installation,
maintenance and operation (switching etc.). At the same time, present policy
disallows the running of more than one feeder (or circuit) in parallel (e.g. having
two LV circuits on the same bay), unless one or both are ABC.
To overcome this limitation, the designer should ensure that the LV feeder is
sufficiently branched, i.e. provided with as many tee-offs as necessary to
service the number of loads.
In general, the LV feeder routes must be chosen such that the transformer will
service the required number of loads determined on the basis of design load
demand values (refer to clause 10.2.3 and HPC-3DC-07-0001-2012 Electrical
Design for Distribution Networks: After Diversity Maximum Demand).
10.2.10.3 Typical Lengths
The length of a LV feeder affects the:
1)

voltage drop on the feeder; and

2)

fault current at the end of the feeder.

Very long LV feeders should generally be avoided since this would only result in
higher voltage drops than necessary, cause improper operation and lead to
possible conductor burnouts.
10.2.10.4 Interconnection with Other Feeders
If a transformer becomes unserviceable, its LV network has to be supplied by
adjacent transformers until repairs can be effected or a replacement put into
service. As such, the LV network should be provided with sufficient numbers of
interconnecting points (e.g. via the use of removable solid links, fuse switches)
to allow lateral interconnections between LV networks of adjacent transformers.
When selecting LV routes, the designer should select routes which can assist in
the provision and location of these interconnecting points, if possible.
The interconnection criteria generally used by Horizon Power is to ensure that
the backbone feeder of any transformer can be interconnected with other LV
feeders from adjacent transformers, at least twice.
If the number of interconnections cannot be provided due to certain constraints,
the designer should consider using a smaller transformer size instead.
10.2.10.5 Pole Positioning and Alignment
When selecting the LV feeder route, the designer must also give consideration to
the positioning of poles adjacent to property boundaries and within the
designated pole alignment. Refer to section 4.4 - Pole Position Guidelines.

10.2.10.6 Other Considerations


Sometimes, in order to mitigate the excessive voltage drops caused by large
motor starting currents, it may be necessary to connect up large motors (e.g.

Page 111 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

large reticulation and sewerage pumps) via a dedicated LV feeder on a separate


pole line.
A similar requirement may be called for to mitigate any interferences caused by
potentially disturbing electrical loads to other customers on the same LV feeder,
e.g. light industrial customers with arc-welders, thyristor controlled motor speed
drives, large motors.
On the other hand, from the nature of the load itself, or due to special requests
from the customer for a more secure supply arrangement, certain loads may
need to be serviced via dedicated LV feeders or from sole-use transformers
(e.g. small hospitals, retirement villages, bulk cold food storages).

10.3

Voltage Drops and Line Currents in LV Feeders

10.3.1

General
A three phase, four wire distribution system servicing a large proportion of single
phase residential loads together with three phase commercial/industrial loads is
subject to rapidly fluctuating currents. These currents produce corresponding
rapidly fluctuating voltages on the system.

10.3.2

Effect of Load Unbalance


It is inevitable that an imbalance between the line currents on the three phases of
a feeder will occur if the feeder services a large number of single-phase loads
(e.g. residential loads).
This imbalance in the line currents leads to a current which flows in the neutral
conductor, which adds to the voltage drop caused by the current flowing in the
phase conductor.
The voltage drop calculation (in LV DESIGN software) takes into account this
added voltage drop caused by the load unbalance , as necessary.

10.3.3

Voltage Drops/Line Currents in Meshed Networks


A Null Point is a point on the meshed portion of the network, through which no
line current flows - the voltage drop from the transformer to either side of the null
point is also the same.
In practice, the location of the null point in the meshed portion of the network can
change as the loads on the meshed portion vary during the day. However, during
times of peak load, the location of the null point would be approximately at the
same position.
The location of the null point in the meshed portion of the network signifies that
the voltage drop from the transformer to either side of the null point is within the
maximum allowable limit. Hence, once the location of the null point is known, the
network can be assumed to be opened at this point and the conductor sizes are
appropriate to ensure that the voltage drop to the null point (and hence to all
other points on the meshed portion of the network) remains within the maximum
allowable limits.
Note: Horizon Powers Distribution Design Manual - Volume 2 (HPC-5DC-070002-2013): Low Voltage Aerial Bundled Cables details the precautions
the designer should note when designing with LV ABC to replace existing
meshed bare overhead networks.

Page 112 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Page 113 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

11

FAULT LEVEL

11.1

Introduction
Fault levels have an effect in three areas of design
1)

protection

2)

equipment rating and conductor burn down

3)

quality of supply

This section details the calculation of fault levels but for their application to
protection design, refer to Chapter 14.

11.2

Equipment Rating
Distribution network fault levels are specified in Horizon Powers Technical Rules
and are provided in Table 11.1.
Table 11.1 Distribution Fault levels
Voltage level

Fault level

Fault level

33 kV

13.1 kA

750 MVA

22 kV

13.1 kA

500 MVA

11 kV

18.1 kA

350 MVA

6.6 kV

18.1 kA

200 MVA

The low voltage network fault level is 31.5 kA where supplied from one
transformer and 63.0 kA where supplied from two transformers in parallel.
Equipment selected must have an equal or higher rating to those values provided
in Table 11.1 . When selecting equipment , care must be taken that the
manufacturers information refers to the same conditions. Fault levels specified in
Table 11.1 are steady state symmetrical values.
Equipment purchased in bulk as standard equipment to be installed on the
network is typically designed to meet the highest possible fault level or a wide
range of fault levels. In some instances, to reduce cost, an item of equipment
may be selected with a fault rating closer to the maximum fault level. However,
the designer must then consider the risks associated with:
a)
b)
c)

a non standard item being used in the wrong location;


future staff assuming all equipment in an area has a certain standard fault
rating; and
probable need for premature replacement due to inadequate fault rating.

Page 114 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

11.3

Fault Calculation
Unless otherwise noted all fault currents are "steady state" symmetrical values.
When calculating maximum fault levels, fault resistance should not normally be
included.
When calculating minimum fault levels, a suitable fault resistance should be
included.
The following indicates the four main kinds of faults which occur in a power
system.

Three phase fault


Phase to phase fault
Single phase to earth fault
Phase to phase to earth fault

Other fault conditions which may require consideration are short circuits within
distribution transformers, conductor open circuits, cross country faults (i.e.
simultaneous faults at different points on the system) and system instability.
The magnitude and distribution of fault currents are influenced by the following
factors :
a)
b)
c)
d)

Source impedance at the zone substation bus bars.


The arrangement and impedance of the lines, transformers and reactors.
The neutral earthing arrangements and the value of any neutral earthing
impedance.
The type of fault and location on the system.

In fault calculations the following simplifying assumptions are often made:


a)
b)

11.4

The driving voltage remains constant during the fault. (Usually taken as
being 100% of nominal system voltage).
The effects of load current on the system prior to the fault are ignored as it
is small in comparison with the fault currents.

Formulae
Formulae are given below for calculation of the fault level on a per unit basis.
The fault level is converted to a current (kA) which is the standard method for
specifying equipment fault rating.
Several items of plant which make up the power system will not necessarily all be
operating at the same voltage level, it is therefore necessary to express their
impedance values in a form which they can be quickly combined directly in the
network reduction calculations without reference to the system voltage. The three
methods of expressing plant impedances so that they can be directly combined
are in:
a)
b)
c)

ohms to a common voltage base;


per cent to a common MVA base; or
per unit value to a common MVA base

The definition of these quantities is provided in the following sub clauses:

Page 115 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

11.4.1

Ohmic Impedance
If Zp is the impedance in ohm per phase of an item of plant operating at a
nominal voltage Vp, its impedance ZB converted to a common voltage base VB is:

11.4.2

Per Cent Impedance


This is defined as the percentage of the phase to neutral voltage which is
dropped across the item of plant concerned when a specified value of current is
passed through the item of plant. The specified current being that corresponding
to a stated MVA base, i.e. the percentage impedance:
%

Where
- phase to phase voltage in volts
- phase to neutral impedance in ohms
- current in amps corresponding to the
Plant impedance values are usually given in per cent on their own MVA rating
and conversion of these values to a common MVA base is achieved by the
formula:
%
It is usual when doing fault calculations to use per cent impedance on 100 MVA
base. It is therefore necessary to convert all the plant impedances to a 100 MVA
base when preparing the equivalent network diagram.
11.4.3

Per Unit Impedance


This is the same as per cent impedance but expressed as a fraction of the phase
to neutral volts instead of a percentage.

11.4.4

Worked Example using Per Unit method


The diagram below shows a 22 kV overhead line feeder, fed from a Zone
Substation, with a length of 3.5 km.

Figure 11.1: - 22 kV Overhead Line Feeder

Page 116 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

The first part of this example will calculate the three phase fault level at the 22 kV
terminals of the distribution transformer. The second part will calculate the phase
to earth fault level on the low voltage network at a distance from the transformer.
For the purpose of this calculation the impedances are expressed in percentage
values on 100 MVA base.
The Zone Substation Source Fault Level, is required and
The maximum value is used, say, 240 MVA for this example.
From the table of conductor parameters for Standard Distribution Overhead Lines
in Appendix C, the values of RA and XA for 6/1/3.00 ACSR conductor and the
spacing factor XD are:
RA = 0.8930 ohm/km;
XA = 0.3208 ohm/km; and
XD = 0.0857 ohm/km.
Calculation:
Assume system base MVAB = 100 MVA
Base voltage (phase to phase), VB = 22 kV
Base impedance:
22

100

4.84

Source impedance:
100

240

0.417

Line impedance:

3.5

0.8930

3.1255

0.3208

0.0857

1.4228

Total impedance (line + source):


3.1255
0.646

1.4228

4.84

0.417

0.711

0.646

0.711

0.960
Fault level at the 22 kV terminals of the distribution transformer:
100

0.96

104

Short circuit current at the MV terminals of the distribution transformer:


104

10

22

10

Page 117 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

2730

2.7

For the second part of the example, the single phase to earth fault is taken to be
at 320 m from the transformer. A simplified method is used for LV side
calculations using whole impedance values instead of resistive and reactive
components.
From the table of conductor parameters for Standard Distribution Overhead Lines
in Appendix C, the values of RA and XA for 7/4.50 AAC conductors are:
RA = 0.315 ohm/km;
XA = 0.260 ohm/km
ZA = ( R2A + X2A) ohm/km
ZA = 0.41 ohm/km
Base impedance:
0.415

100

0.00172

Transformer impedance:
0.044

100

0.315

0.044

100

0.315

13.96

(Transformer impedance is assumed to be fully reactive)

Line impedance:
ZA
0.32

0.41

0.128
0.128

0.00172 pu

76.2
The above constitutes the positive, negative and zero sequence line impedance
values up to the point of the fault.
Fault Impedance:
3

0.32

ZA

00172pu

= 229
The LV side impedances are much larger than the MV side impedances and
transformer impedance are therefore neglected in the calculations.
Total impedance to fault: (
= Positive sequence impedance + Negative sequence impedance + Zero
sequence impedance + Fault Impedance

Page 118 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

= (3 X 74.42) + 229 pu
= 457
Fault MVA:
3
3 100

457

0.67M

Fault Current:
0.67
11.4.5

3 415

913 A

Worked example using MVA method


The MVA method is a variation to the per unit and ohmic methods.
The example in clause 11.4.4 is reworked in this case. The first step is to convert
the typical single line diagram to an equivalent MVA single line diagram and then
reduce the MVA single line diagram into a single MVA value at the point of fault.
The equivalent MVA single diagram is provided in Figure 11.2.
22 kV utility source:
= 240 MVA
22 kV Line:
= (222 3.43) MVA

([3.1252 + 1.4232] = 3.43)

= 141 MVA
Fault Level on 22 kV Line:
= 89 MVA

(Figure 8.2)

Fault Current:
= (89 (3 x 22) A
= 2.4 kA
Transformer:
= 0.315 0.044
= 7.2 MVA
LV Line:
= (0.4152 0.13) MVA

(0.41 x 0.32 = 1.3)

= 1.3 MVA
Fault Impedance:
= (0.4152 0.4) MVA

(3 x 0.32 x 0.41 = 0.4)

= 0.4 MVA
Fault Level at Fault location
= 3 x 0.2 MVA
= 0.6 MVA

Page 119 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Fault Current:
= (0.6 (3 x 0.415) A
= 836 A
From the above calculations it can be seen that the fault currents at both 22 kV
and Low Voltage are slightly lower when using the MVA method than when using
the Per Unit method. However, the MVA method is much easier to use
particularly when there are many network components.
11.4.6

Zone Substation Fault Levels


The up-to-date zone substation fault level values should be obtained from Energy
Systems Planning (a branch of Commercial & Business Development Division).

Figure 11.2

Page 120 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

12

INSULATION COORDINATION

12.1

Introduction
Insulation coordination refers to the electrical design of a system to ensure the
satisfactory performance of the system with respect to over voltages.
Coordination involves determination of possible over voltages followed by the
selection of suitably rated equipment and the design of protection schemes to
limit the impact over voltages on the system. The latter two steps are an iterative
process, however it is normal to select equipment with standard insulation
withstand levels. Protection is then selected which is a balance of economics and
satisfactory performance (i.e. acceptable equipment failure rates and system
outage rates).
The ability of insulation to withstand overvoltage depends on the rate of rise and
duration of the overvoltage. Consequently two voltage withstand levels are
specified for equipment:
power frequency overvoltage; and
impulse overvoltage
Impulse over voltage is usually the critical factor for distribution line design. It is
referred to as the Basic Insulation Level (BIL). The values of BIL for standard
overhead distribution equipment are listed in Table 12.1.
Table 12.1: - BIL for Distribution Equipment
BIL (kV) Peak
40
60
95
150
200(170)(150)*

System Voltage (kV) RMS


LV
6.6 kV
11 kV
22 kV
33 kV

*For some equipment only the values in brackets are available.

Power frequency flashovers can occur under wet or high humidity conditions. An
overhead line must be designed to avoid such flashovers. Even if the insulation is
able to withstand an initial withstand without damage, due to recloses there is a
likelihood of a subsequent flashovers when the wet or polluted conditions exist.
Where wood is used in distribution structures it provides an increase in BIL. Due
to the variable nature of wood and given that its electrical withstand strength
varies with moisture content only indicative values can be stated. The flashover
voltage of a distribution pole is between 1500 2500 kV. For a 1 m length of
cross-arm with a pin insulator it is approximately 300 kV.

Page 121 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

12.2

Design for Power Frequency Overvoltages


This is achieved primarily by designing to deal with pollution, based on AS 4436.
The basic concept is to increase the surface creepage distance so that it is long
enough to prevent a pollution flashover across the insulator surface. Due to the
highly polluted environments that Horizon Powers overhead assets are located
in, insulators are selected that are suitable for very heavily contaminated
environments. Accordingly, insulators with a minimum nominal specific creepage
distance of 31 mm/kV is recommended. Such insulators are suitable for salt
densities greater than 3.0 g/m.

12.3

Design for Impulse voltages

12.3.1

Lightning
Lightning can cause over voltages in two ways:
Direct strikes
Induced strokes

12.3.1.1

Direct Strikes
Direct strikes inject very high currents which coupled with the surge impedance
of the line produce over voltages in the mega volt range.
Since lightning tends to strike the highest object, earthed wires installed above
the line can provide protection. (Natural protection is provided where surrounding
vegetation or buildings are higher than the line).
The degree of protection depends on the shielding angle of the overhead earth
wire, as shown in Figure 12.1.

Figure 12.1: - Lightning Shielding Angle

Page 122 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

An angle of 30 degrees has been found to give good protection. On very flat
ground this angle could be increased up to 40 degrees.
The average probability of a direct strike to a line can be calculated as follows:
4
For example, 100 km of 9 m high line in an area of ground flash density of 12
flashes/km2/year would have an expected strike rate of
0.2

100

10

0.72 per year or one every 1.4 years

A map of the Average Annual Number of Thunder Days is shown in Figure 11.2.
The relationship between thunder days and ground flash density (Ng) is
approximately.
0.0025

flashes per km2/annum

Where, T equals thunder days per annum

Page 123 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 12.2: - Average Annual Number of Thunder Days

Page 124 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 12.3 Average Annual lightning ground flash density

Page 125 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

12.3.1.2

Induced Strokes
Lightning striking the ground in the proximity of an overhead line can induce over
voltages in the line.
The number of induced surges of a significant magnitude occurring on a given
section of line can be estimated as follows:
0.3
Where:
number of induced voltage surges
line height (m)
ground flash density (flashes/km2/year)

S line length (km)


For example, 100 km of 9 m high line in an area of ground flash density of
12 flashes/km2/year would have an expected strike rate of:
0.3

0.2

100

= 54 induced voltage surges/year


The number of surges exceeding a certain voltage magnitude can be determined
by multiplying NiS by the fraction indicated in Figure 12.4.

Figure 12: - Cumulative Distribution of Induced Surge Voltages

Page 126 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

12.3.2

Current
Each of the above circumstances induces surges of different magnitude and
wave shape. Lightning stroke current usually varies from 3 A to 200 kA, however
the average stroke current is 30 kA. The typical lightning flash is usually made up
of 3 or 4 strokes, with intervals of 15 to 150 ms between strokes.

12.3.3

Surge Impedance
The surge impedance of a 3 phase distribution line is approximately 200 ohms.
An average lightning surge of 30 kA would then produce an overvoltage of
6,000 kV.
This is high enough to flashover the full length of a wood pole.

12.3.4

Lightning Protection using Surge Arresters


Surge arresters are installed to protect equipment being damaged by lightning.
A surge arrester will conduct a surge to ground but will not allow a power
frequency flow current to pass.
An arresters residual voltage value is the voltage across the arrester whilst it is
conducting the surge to ground. The residual voltage needs to be significantly
less than the equipment BIL in order to provide satisfactory protection. A margin
of protection as defined below should be established.
%
100
100
Where:

12.3.5

BIL

- basic insulation level of equipment to be protected (kV)

Vtot

- total voltage drop across equipment being protected

Selection of Surge Arresters


The steps to be followed are:
1)
2)
3)

Select the Rated Voltage for the arrester based on the continuous
operating voltage
Determine the lightning discharge current. At voltages below 36 kV, 5 kA or
10 kA ratings are specified, however, for Horizon Powers areas 10 kA is
more appropriate.
Select the creepage distance (refer to clause 6.1.1)

Surge arrester earth leads must be as short and straight as possible in all surge
arrester applications. The primary reason is inductive surge impedance. The
selection of an appropriate surge arrester for a given application can be negated
by poor installation practices. The length and configuration of the line and earth
leads connecting the arrester to the apparatus being protected is critical in the
determination of the arrester protective levels and margins.

Page 127 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Surge arresters are designed to protect equipment from impulse over voltages
that could cause flashover or damage to the insulation that is in parallel with the
arrester. For distribution class arresters the primary impulse overvoltage is
lightning and switching surges are neglected.
When an overvoltage surge is impressed across the arrester terminals, the
arrester begins to conduct the resulting discharge current to ground. The flow of
discharge current through the arrester causes a discharge voltage to appear
across the terminals of the arrester. If the arrester line and ground leads are also
installed in parallel with the insulation being protected, the combined lead
inductive voltage drop is additive to the arrester discharge voltage.
The inductive voltage drop in the line and ground leads is a function of the lead
inductance, current rate of rise and time according to the formula: V = L di/dt .
For a straight lead wire, the inductance (L) can be assumed to be 1.3 H/meter.
If the lead wires are coiled the inductance will be significantly greater.
Arrester manufacturers catalogs, drawings, and data will usually provide
protective characteristics of their arresters, including maximum discharge
voltages for several discharge currents and voltage times to crest from steep
wave through switching surge. Those arrester discharge voltages plus lead
inductive voltage (if appropriate) are usually plotted and compared to the
corresponding insulation characteristics to determine the protective margins on
insulation coordination curves similar to Figure 12.5. Figure 12.5 also illustrates
the typical volt-time characteristic of most insulation. That is, the shorter the time
the greater the insulation or dielectric strength.

Figure 12.5 Volt Time Characteristic for Insulation

Page 128 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Published arrester IR discharge voltages are normally based on a standard 8/20


impulse current wave (8 s to crest and 20 s to half crest on the tail) however,
the highest voltages to which the insulation is subjected are rapidly rising steep
wave impulses due to lightning. It is now known that rapidly rising impulse
currents are far more common than previously thought. Consistent with this rate
of rise, a lead wire voltage drop of 26 kV/m is often used in calculating the
protective levels for installations exposed to rapidly rising fast front surges.
The example below illustrates the effect of arrester line and ground leads
connected to a surge arrester and connected in parallel with insulation.
Example
The 22 kV transformer in Figure 12.6 needs to be protected from surge damage.
The BIL for 22 kV is 150 kV (Table 12.1). The required margin of protection is
50%;
Vtotal

= BIL {(MOP) 100 + 1}


= 150 {50 100 + 1}
= 100 kV

The residual voltage for a suitable arrester with continuous operating voltage
22 kV and rated voltage for a standard 8/20 s wave is 77 kV (from a
manufacturers catalogue)
Assuming line and ground lead impedance of 1.3 H/ft, the resulting inductive
voltage developed across the leads = 1.3 x 10 x (10 x 103 A / 0.5 x 10 sec) =
26 kV/m. (Assuming a 10 kA discharge current cresting at 0.5 s which is more
conservative than a standard 8/20 s wave) Thus, for every meter length of line
and ground lead, 26 kV must be added to the arrester residual voltage when
calculating the overvoltage protective margins provided by the arrester and its
connections.
If the arrester is not directly connected on to the transformer tank, the ground
lead distance d2 comes into play.
Therefore:
Vtotal

= 100 kV = 26 (d1 + d2) + 77

Hence, solving for (d1 + d2):


(d1 + d2)

= (100 - 77) 26
= 0.9 m

The maximum lead distance of (d1 + d2) is 0.9 m in order to provide a margin of
protection of 50%.
In this example, if the lead distance is 2.8 m, the MOP is zero, and for higher
lead distances the MOP is negative.

Page 129 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Figure 12.6 Transformer Protected with a Lighting Arrester


12.3.6

Impulse Flashover of Adjacent Insulators


In the above example, if the full length of down lead to ground is 10 m and the
transformer ground resistance is 30 ohms, the voltage rise of the phase
conductor due to the lightning strike is approximately 637 kV. (i.e. 260 kV across
the down lead; 77 kV across the arrestor; and 300 kV across the earth
resistance).
This lightning impulse level will cause adjacent insulators to flashover as it is
much greater than their BIL, resulting in a fault with power frequency follow
through current. However, there is a high probability that the line can be
successfully auto reclosed after the fault is cleared.

Page 130 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

13

STREET LIGHTING

13.1

Policy
Street Lighting is an essential service for the community with importance focused
upon safety, security and amenity aspects. As such, Street lighting needs to be
provided and maintained to a reasonable standard and with appropriate levels of
public accountability.
Effective Street Light operation is best managed through a combination of bulk
Street Light replacement, regular night patrols, and response to reports of street
light failure from the public in accordance with the published Horizon Power
Customer Charter.

13.2

Asset Hierarchy
The Street Lighting asset family includes:

13.3

Support structures including steel, wood and concrete poles, outreaches,


and foundation etc

Street Light Control Boxes and its associated accessories and spares

Luminaries: including High Pressure Sodium (HPS), Mercury Vapour


(MV), Metal Halide (MH), Compact Florescent (CFL), Light Emitting Diodes
(LED), accessories and spares.

Lighting Categories and Application


The lighting categories are broadly divided as follows:

Category V lighting: Lighting which is applicable to roads on which the


visual requirements of motorists are dominant, e.g. traffic routes.
Subcategories range from V1 to V5 (see Table 13.1)

Category P lighting: Lighting which is applicable to roads on which the


visual requirements of pedestrians are dominant, e.g. local roads and to
local area traffic management devices (LATMS) installed on such roads.
Also lighting which is applicable to outdoor public areas, other than roads,
where the visual requirements of pedestrians are dominant, e.g. outdoor
shopping precincts. Subcategories range from P1 to P12. Majority of
Horizon Powers street lighting assets fit in category P4. (see Table 13.1)

Table 13.1 indicates the lighting category, typical spacing, pole heights and lamp
types used in Horizon Power.

Page 131 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 13.1 - Lighting Categories for Roadway/Public Spacing and


Associated Parameters.

Lighting
Category

Type of
Public
Spacing /
Roadways

P4

40 - 65

15 - 20

6.5

CF, LED

V3

65 - 100

30 - 40

10.5 or 12.5

HPS, MH,
MH/LED,
LED

SubArterial/Princi
pal

V4

65 - 100

30 - 40

10.5 or 12.5

HPS, MH,
MH/LED,
LED

Cycleway/Footpath

P3

(40 - 65)* or
(65 - 100)**

Any***

All

CF, LED

Cul-de-sacs

P4

40 - 65

15 - 20

6.5

CF, LED

Commercial
and Industrial
precinct

V3

65 - 80

30 - 40

10.5 or 12.5

HPS, MH,
MH/LED,
LED

Open Car
Park

P11

20-40

Any***

6.5 or 10.5

CF, LED

Mall

P7

20-40

Any***

6.5 or 10.5

CF, LED

Civic square
or Retail
precinct

P7

20-40

30 - 40

6.5 or 10.5

CF, LED

Transport
Interchange

P7

20-40

N/A

6.5 or 10.5

CF, LED

Residential or
Local road

Typical
Possible
Road Width Pole Height
(m)
(m)

Arterial

Lamp Type

Notes:
* For Footpath with Residential or Local road
** For Footpath with Arterial roads
*** Could be any width

Page 132 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

13.4

Lighting Design Basis


Lighting design and luminaires must be in accordance with AS 1158.

13.4.1

Selection of Lamp Types


The following factors should influence the selection of luminaires;
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Energy efficiency ( Lumens/ Watt)


Very long life (e.g., 70% light output after 50,000 hours)
Very low/ no maintenance ( no lamp replacement)
Low life cycle cost
Reduction in Greenhouse gas emissions

Horizon Power currently install a combination of Metal Halide, High Pressure


Sodium, Compact Fluorescent and LED lamps depending on the application.
The old incandescent lamps are replaced with the above lamps wherever a pole
is replaced or other work makes it appropriate to do so.
The Main Roads Department uses low pressure sodium lights to light
crosswalks on highways and major roads. Horizon Power do not use these lights
for general highway lighting to allow drivers and pedestrians to readily recognise
crosswalks by the distinctive light colour.
13.4.2

Luminaire Technical Requirements


1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

13.4.3

Minimum life of 20 years.


Comply with AS/NZS 1158.6 and AS/NZS 60598.
Must be individually Photo Electric (PE) Cell controlled.
Luminaire internal control gear including chokes and Photo Electric (PE)
Cells must comply with AS 3771.
Interference suppression must be fitted (in accordance with AS/NZS 4051).
Minimum IP 55 rating in accordance with AS 60529.
High level resistance to vandalism Minimum IK08 in accordance with
AS/NZS 1158.
Luminaires and their control gear internal wiring must be Double Insulted.

Design Considerations
Selection of an efficient luminaire is one thing, however, an efficient design has
then to be produced
The following factors should be considered in the design:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Energy efficiency (Watts/ Linear metre)


Very low/no maintenance (Long lumen life, low dirt depreciation, low PE
replacement)
How much of over design for lumen depreciation
Low life cycle cost
Reduction in Greenhouse gas emissions

Page 133 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

13.4.4

Minimum Lighting Performance Requirements


Design methods, requirements and application guidance for each of the lighting
categories above are given in the AS/NZS 1158 suite of standards. The
minimum design requirements are extracted from AS/NZS for P and V categories
and presented Table 13.2 and 13.3 below. All design for new lighting schemes
shall comply with as a minimum or exceed these requirements.

13.4.5

Lamp Poles
Lamp poles currently used by Horizon Power are limited to concrete, steel or
suitable mono or blended materials, expected to have a minimum life span of 40
years. Only circular or eight side polygonal poles are used. Some of the critical
characteristics of the poles are:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Must be suitable to withstand Region D wind conditions


Pole tip deflection at ultimate loads must be less than 4%
High vandalism rating of IK 08 in accordance with AS 1158
Minimum height above ground of 6.5 m, 10.5 m or 12.5 m
Should be installed in the 2.7 m alignment or 0.5 m alignments

When installing or replacing luminaires, on existing overhead power lines the


existing poles may need to be utilised. When luminaires have been on every
second pole and there is an even number of poles, lights will be required on two
adjacent poles.
Individual councils may request extra lights or the use of higher wattage lights.
When poles carrying mains on the standard alignment are a long way from the
carriageway edge, it is necessary to install additional poles adjacent to the road
for the lights.
On standard width Road Verges the street lighting pole should be erected in the
Pole and Tree allocation area, i.e. 2.7 m from the Property Line. If this position
does not allow enough distance between the kerb edge and the street lighting
pole to install a foot path, advice should be sought from the local Shire.

Page 134 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 13.2 - Minimum Technical Lighting Performance Requirements for


Category P (Table 2.6 of AS/NZS 1158.3.1)

Table 13.3 - Minimum Technical Lighting Performance Requirements for


Category V (Table 2.2 of AS/NZS 1158.1.1)

Page 135 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 13.4 Minimum Lighting Performance Requirement Lamp Life


Initial light
output
(lumens)

End of Life
value
(lumens)

Approx. Ave.
Operating
hours

Mercury Vapour (80 W)

3850

2310

16000

Mercury Vapour (125 W)

6300

3780

16000

High Pressure Sodium (150 W)

14000

10500

15500

High Pressure Sodium (250 W)

26000

18200

25000

Metal Halide (70 W)

7700

4620

20000

Compact Florescent (42 W)

3200

1920

20000

LED (56 W)

5000

4600

50000

LED (112 W)

10000

9300

50000

Lamp Type

13.4.6

Electrical Protection of Street Lights


1)

Always select the smallest possible fuse size *.

2)

Existing switchwire circuits must be removed. However until this is done, a


maximum fuse size of 32 amp is permitted.

3)

Existing circuits using 16 amp or 32 amp fuses, shall not be converted to


higher rated fuses.

4)

Existing 63 amp (or larger) fuses, shall be reduced to 32 amp or 16 amp if


this can be achieved at a reasonable cost.

* HRC fuses cannot be relied upon to operate rapidly enough to prevent risk of
injury/death should a conductor fall to ground. Normally the resistance to ground
of a fallen wire is too high to allow the fuse to detect and clear the fault. However
the smallest possible fuse size should always be used in order to maximise the
probability of the fuse operating if a fault does occurs.
Table 13.5 shows the maximum number of lamps or watts that should be placed
on a switchwire protected with the fuse sizes shown.

Page 136 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

Table 13.5 -Table Allowable Number of Lamps/Watts Per Street light Fuse
Fuse Rating
16 amp

32 amp

63 amp

80 watt lamps

30

60

120

50 watt lamps

50

100

200

125 watt lamps

20

40

80

150 watt lamps

17

34

68

250 watt lamps

10

20

40

2,400

4,800

9,600

Watts

Page 137 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

APPENDIX A REVISION INFORMATION


(Informative) Horizon Power has endeavoured to provide standards of the
highest quality and would appreciate notification if any errors are found or even
queries raised.
Each Standard makes use of its own comment sheet which is maintained
throughout the life of the standard, which lists all comments made by
stakeholders regarding the standard.
A comment sheet found in DM: 3693210, can be used to record any errors or
queries found in or pertaining to this standard, which can then be addressed
whenever the standard gets reviewed.

Date
01/02/2014

Rev No.
1

Notes
First Issue

Page 138 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

APPENDIX B RELATED INFORMATION


This appendix lists other documents that are related to this document
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

Standard Distribution Design for Power Lines and Cables in the vicinity of
Conductive Structures HPC-9DC-07-0001-2013
Standard Distribution Design for Railway Crossings HPC-9DC-07-0002-2013
Standard Distribution Design for Water Crossings HPC-9DC-07-0003-2013
Standard Distribution Line Earthing HPC-9DC-08-0001-2012
Standard Distribution Electrical Protection HPC-9DC-19-0001- 2013
Information Essential Distribution Overhead Line Design HPC-3DC-08-0002-2013

Page 139 of 139

Print Date 14/02/2014

Horizon Power Corporation Document Number: HPC-5DC-07-0005-2012


Uncontrolled document when printed. Printed copy expires one week from print date. Refer to Document No. for current version.

You might also like