Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Concrete Buildings
2009 IBC | ASCE/SEI 7-05 | ACI 318-08
S. K. Ghosh
Prabuddha Dasgupta
Cover photo: Beekman Tower, courtesy of Forest City Ratner and WSP Cantor Seinuk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE . xiii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..1-1
1.1
OVERVIEW.................1-1
1.2
1.4
REFERENCES 1-39
INTRODUCTION.............. 2-1
2.2
iii
2-18
2-19
2-21
2-22
Load Combinations..
Design of Beam C4-C5..
Design of Column C4..
Design of Shear Wall on Line 7
2-25
2-26
2-29
2-31
2-34
2-34
2-36
2-40
2-41
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2-58
2-59
2-60
2-63
2-66
REFERENCES.. 2-83
INTRODUCTION............... 3-1
3.2
3.3
Load Combinations..
Slab Design...
Design of Column B2..
Design of Shear Wall on Line 4
3-26
3-26
3-29
3-30
3.4
3-31
3-31
3-33
3-34
3-37
3-38
3-40
3-41
3-41
Load Combinations..
Slab Design...
Design of Column B2..
Design of Shear Wall on Line 4
3-42
3-44
3-48
3-48
3-52
3-53
3-54
3-55
3-55
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.8
REFERENCES... 3-61
INTRODUCTION.............. 4-1
4.2
4-2
4-2
4-4
4-4
4-14
4-14
4-16
4-16
vii
4.4
Load Combinations.
Design of Beam B3-C3..
Design of Column C3..
Design of Beam-Column Joint..
4-27
4-28
4-32
4-36
4-39
4-39
4-40
4-41
Load Combinations.....
Design of Beam B3-C3......
Design of Column C3.....
Design of Beam-Column Joint..
4-42
4-43
4-46
4-50
REFERENCES........
4-5
INTRODUCTION..... 5-1
5.2
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5-15
5-16
5-17
5-18
5-22
5-23
5-24
5-25
ix
5.6
5-32
5-33
5-34
5-36
REFERENCES........ 5-42
INTRODUCTION..... 6-1
6.2
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-3
6-4
6-10
6-10
6-11
6-12
6-12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6.4
6-16
6-16
6-18
6-18
6-19
REFERENCES...... 6-23
xi
PREFACE
xiii
The ground motion maps and parameters used in seismic design were completely
different. Also, since the inception of seismic design in this country, soils at the site
of the structure had not been given as much importance in seismic design, as it was
given in the 2000 IBC. This resulted in a significant impact on the cost of
construction in many parts of the country, particularly if such construction was to be
founded on softer soils. This created a need for a publication similar to the volume
first issued by PCA in 1992. The first edition of this publication by S.K. Ghosh and
David Fanella, issued in June 2003, was developed to fill that need. The purpose of
the first edition was to assist the engineer in the proper application of the seismic
and wind design provisions of the 2000 IBC. This code had adopted ACI 318-99 for
concrete design and construction, with some modifications.
The second edition by S.K. Ghosh, David Fanella, and Xumei Liang, issued in March
2005, updated this publication to the 2003 edition of the IBC. Chapter 1 was updated
to reflect the changes from the 2000 to the 2003 edition of the IBC. For concrete
design and construction, the 2003 IBC had adopted ACI 318-02 with some
modifications.
The changes from the 2000 to the 2003 edition of the IBC were incremental in
nature, as compared with the revolutionary changes that took place from the prior
model codes, now called the legacy codes, to the first (2000) edition of the IBC.
However, many of the changes were substantive. And, the magnitude of the changes
was such that it was not possible to leave any one of the examples untouched from
the first edition of the publication.
One change in the 2003 IBC that must be singled out was the extensive use of ASCE
7-02 in the seismic provisions. The 2003 IBC, in fact, allowed seismic design to be
carried out in accordance with Sections 9.1 through 9.6, 9.13, and 9.14 of ASCE
7-02, rather than by Sections 1613 through 1623 of the code. Even if this option was
not followed, much of the text of the seismic provisions of the code had been
dropped in favor of reference to ASCE 7-02. Dual references were therefore made to
the 2003 IBC and ASCE 7-02 section numbers throughout the text.
The third edition by S.K. Ghosh and Qiang Shen, issued in December 2008, updated
this publication to the 2006 edition of the IBC. Chapter 1 was updated to reflect the
changes from the 2003 to the 2006 edition of the IBC. For concrete design and
construction, the 2006 IBC had adopted ACI 318-05 with some modifications.
Major changes had occurred in Chapter 16, Structural Loads, of the 2006 IBC. The
most significant of them was the removal of large portions of the text that were
related to the determination of snow, wind, and seismic loads This resulted in
substantial reduction in material actually contained in the 2006 IBC. Portions that
were still left in the IBC related to local geology, terrain, or other environmental
conditions that many building officials wish to specify when adopting the model code
by local ordinance. Seismic provisions left in the 2006 IBC were now in a single
section, Section 1613, as opposed to multiple sections from 1613 to 1623, as in the
2003 IBC. There were other substantive changes because the reference standard for
all design loads and seismic design provisions was now ASCE 7-05. The magnitude of
the changes, once again, was such that it was not possible to leave any one of the
examples untouched from the second edition of the publication.
This fourth edition updates this publication to the 2009 edition of the IBC. Chapter 1
has been updated to reflect the changes from the 2006 to the 2009 edition of the
xiv
PREFACE
IBC. For concrete design and construction, the 2009 IBC has adopted ACI 318-08
with a few modifications.
Because ASCE 7-05 remains the reference standard for design loads and seismic
design provisions, changes in Chapter 16 from the 2006 to the 2009 IBC are not
extensive. One of the more significant changes is that the 2009 IBC has added an
alternate all-heights method of wind design. Also, whereas the 2006 IBC contained
only two alternatives to the seismic design provisions of ASCE 7-05, the 2009 IBC
has added six more alternatives and one modification.
More importantly, ACI 318-08 contains a significant number of substantive changes
from ACI 318-05. Chapter 21 has been reorganized, meaning all Chapter 21 section
numbers have changed from ACI 318-05. As a result, modifications have had to be
made in all of the design examples.
In Chapter 1, an introduction to earthquake-resistant design is provided, along with
summaries of the seismic and wind design provisions of the 2009 IBC. Chapter 2 is
devoted to an office building utilizing a dual shear wall-frame interactive system in
one direction and a moment-resisting frame system in the orthogonal direction.
Designs for Seismic Design Categories (SDC) A, C, D, and E are illustrated in both
directions. Chapter 3 features a residential building, which utilizes a shear-wall frame
interactive system in SDC A and B and a building frame system for lateral resistance
in SDC C, D, and E. Chapter 4 presents the design of a school building with a
moment-resisting frame system in SDC B, C, and D. A residential building utilizing a
bearing wall system is treated in Chapter 5. Design is illustrated for SDC A, B, C, D,
and E. The final (sixth) chapter is devoted to design of a precast parking structure
utilizing building frame system in SDC B, C, and D. The Seismic Design Category
represents a combination of seismic risk at the site of the structure, occupancy
category of the structure, and soil characteristics at the site of the structure. While
design is always for the combination of gravity, wind, and seismic forces, wind forces
typically govern the design in the low seismic design categories (particularly A), and
earthquake forces typically govern in the high seismic design categories (particularly
D and above). Detailing requirements depend on the seismic design category,
regardless of whether wind or seismic forces govern the design. This publication is
intended to provide an appreciation as to how design and detailing change with
changes in the seismic design category. We have taken care to include detailed
results of structural analysis within the examples.
Although every attempt has been made to impart editorial consistency to the seven
chapters, some inconsistencies probably still remain. In view of the extensive
numerical calculations presented, some errors, almost certainly, are also to be found.
The authors would be grateful to any reader who would bring such errors, misprints
or inconsistencies to their attention. Other suggestions for improvement would also
be gratefully received.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The writer is grateful to Dr. Jaehong Kim, formerly of S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc., for
his valuable contributions to this update. Deepika Katta of S. K. Ghosh Associates
Inc. also deserves many thanks for her help.
Palatine, IL
S.K. Ghosh
xv