Professional Documents
Culture Documents
27 January 2010
ED
AN
EL
L
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
ED
Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.
Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the
copyright holder.
EL
L
Location
AN
Change No.
This UFC supersedes UFC 3-300-10N, dated May 2005; UFC 3-310-01, dated 25 May 2005; UFC 3310-02A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-310-05A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-310-07A, dated 19 June
2006; UFC 3-320-01A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-02A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-04A,
dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-05A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-330-01A, dated 1 March 2005.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
FOREWORD
ED
The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides
planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the
Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with
USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work
for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also
governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction
Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.)
Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the
SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.
EL
L
UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to
users as part of the Services responsibility for providing technical criteria for military
construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities
Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Center for Engineering
and the Environment (AFCEE) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense
agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements.
Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group.
Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service
proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request (CCR). The form is
also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.
UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following
source:
Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.
AN
Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current
electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.
______________________________________
JAMES C. DALTON, P.E.
Chief, Engineering and Construction
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
______________________________________
DENNIS FIRMAN
Director of the Air Force Center for Engineering
and the Environment
Department of the Air Force
______________________________________
JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.
Chief Engineer
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
______________________________________
MICHAEL McANDREW
Director, Facility Investment and
Management
Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Installations and Environment)
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
REVISION SUMMARY SHEET
Document: UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering
ED
AN
The new UFC updates the guidance contained in several existing structural
engineering documents and consolidates it into a single UFC. The updated UFC
is designed to be consistent with and to supplement the guidance contained in
the IBC 2006 as modified by UFC 1-200-01.
The superseded UFC documents included requirements that were not consistent
with industry standards.
EL
L
Description of Changes: This replacement for UFC 3-300-10N, UFC 3-310-01, UFC
3-310-02A, UFC 3-310-05A, UFC 3-310-07A, UFC 3-320-01A, UFC 3-320-02A, UFC 3320-04A, UFC 3-320-05A and UFC 3-330-01A provides requirements for the design
and renovation of new and existing structures. The new UFC adopts the structural
design provisions of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC 2006) for use in DoD
building design.
Impact: There are negligible cost impacts. However, the following benefits should be
realized:
Replacement of outdated and inconsistent criteria documents.
Creation of a single-source reference for modifications to a commercial structural
building code that provides guidance for the design of DoD facilities.
Ensuring that the locations identified and the loadings described are complete
and current with the most up-to-date available information.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...................................................................................... 1
1-2
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1
1-3
APPLICABILITY .................................................................................................. 1
1-4
ED
1-1
EL
L
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 2
2-1.1.1
AN
2-1.2.2
2-1.2.3
2.1.2.4
2.1.2.5
2-1.2.6
2-1.2.6.1
2-1.2.6.2
2-1.2.6.3
2-1.2.1
2-1.3.2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-1.4.1
2-1.4.2
2-1.4.3
2-1.5.2
2-1.5.3
2-1.5.4
ED
2-1.5.1
2-1.6.2
EL
L
2-2
2-2.1.2
2-2.1.2
2-3
2-3.1.2
2-3.1.3
AN
2-3.1.1
2-4
2-4.3.2
2-4.3.2.1
2-4.3.2.2
2-4.3.2.3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-5
2-5.1.2
2-5.1.3
2-5.1.4
2-5.1.5
ED
2-5.2.2
2-5.3.2
2-5.3.3
EL
L
2-5.3.1
CHAPTER 22 STEEL......................................................................................... 18
2-6.1.1
2-6.2.2
AN
2-6.2.1
2-6.4.1
2-6.4.2
2-6.4.3
2-6.4.4
2-6.4.5
2-6.4.6
iii
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
EL
L
ED
3-1
AN
iv
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLES
Title
Page
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
D-1
E-1
E-2
F-1
AN
EL
L
ED
Table
G-1
F-2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
FIGURES
Title
Page
2-1
H-1
H-2
AN
EL
L
ED
Figure
vi
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1-1
1-2
ED
This Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) provides requirements for structures designed and
constructed for the Department of Defense (DoD). These technical requirements are
based on the 2006 International Building Code (IBC 2006), as modified by UFC 1-20001. This information shall be used by structural engineers to develop design
calculations, specifications, plans, and design-build Requests for Proposal (RFPs).
BACKGROUND
EL
L
UFC 1-200-01 uses and supplements IBC 2006 as the building code for DoD. Chapter
2 of this UFC further modifies the IBC for structural-specific design requirements and is
organized by the chapter of IBC that each section modifies. The climatic and seismic
data included in this UFC is intended as a tool to assist in the consistent interpretation
of the data in the IBC at significant DoD installations within the United States, and as
the basis for applying the provisions of UFC 1-200-01 to significant DoD installations
outside of the United States. Chapter 3 provides additional guidance for the design of
structures other than buildings. The IBC 2006 section modifications are one of four
actions, according to the following legend:
[Addition] Add new section, including new section number, not shown in IBC
2006.
[Deletion] Delete referenced IBC 2006 section.
AN
1-3
APPLICABILITY
This UFC applies to all service elements and contractors involved in the planning,
design and construction of DoD facilities worldwide.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
1-4
OTHER CRITERIA
Military criteria other than those listed in this document may be applicable to specific
types of structure. Such structures shall meet the additional requirements of the
applicable military criteria.
1-4.1
1-4.2
ED
EL
L
1-4.3
Progressive Collapse
1-5
AN
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CHAPTER 2 MODIFICATIONS TO IBC
2-1
2-1.1
Section 1603
2-1.1.1
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
EL
L
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
ED
The engineer of record for a structure may delegate responsibility for the design of
systems or component parts of the structure to a qualified delegated engineer. Both the
engineer of record for the structure and the delegated engineer must comply with the
requirements of this UFC. The following are some examples of delegated systems.
AN
The structural engineer of record must review all submittals that have been signed and
sealed by the delegated engineer, to verify compliance with the design intent and the
specified design criteria and to ensure coordination with the contract documents and
other shop drawings. All submittals from the delegated engineer must be approved by
the engineer of record prior to the start of fabrication of the system or component part
and prior to any field construction that may be affected by the system or component
part.
2-1.2
Section 1604
2-1.2.1
The structural designer shall ensure that the maximum allowable frame drift is suitable
for the proposed structure considering all details of construction. See ASCE 7 Appendix
C Serviceability Considerations including commentary, and Section B-1.1 of UFC 3301-01 for additional guidance.
Wall systems and other building elements that are not part of the lateral force resisting
system in the direction under consideration shall be designed to be adequate to safely
support all applied loadings in combination with the forces resulting from the
displacements due to the design story drift; either from wind or seismic; or be isolated to
3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ensure that they are not susceptible to damage. Masonry and other brittle wall systems
are particularly susceptible to damage if not properly integrated into the design to
ensure that they can adequately resist the stresses resulting from the building
deformations or are effectively isolated to prevent damage.
Exception:
1) Reinforced concrete frame members not designed as part of the seismic
lateral force-resisting system shall comply with Section 21.9 of ACI 318.
2-1.2.2
ED
All structural vertical load bearing wall elements shall be considered to be part of the
lateral force-resisting system. All applicable provisions of UFC 3-310-04 Table B-2 shall
apply.
2-1.2.3
EL
L
Deflections of structural members shall not exceed the more restrictive of the limitations
of Sections 1604.3.2 through 1604.3.5 or those permitted by Table 1604.3, or Table 2-1
of UFC 3-301-01.
1604.3.6 Limits [Replacement]
AN
Deflection of structural members over span, l, shall not exceed that permitted by Table
1604.3 or Table 2-1 of UFC 3-301-01.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE 2-1
LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING EXTERIOR WALL
FINISHES a,b,c
Brick veneer
Stucco
Exterior Insulation Finish Systems
Cement board
Stone Masonry
ED
L/600
L/360
L/240
L/360
VERIFY WITH
STONE SUPPLIER
L/240
L/240
L/240
EL
L
2.1.2.4
AN
Replace Table 1604.5 of the IBC with Table 2-2 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC
to Table 1604.5 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table 2-2 of this UFC.)
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE 2-2
OCCUPANCY CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES
Occupancy
Category
Wind
Factor
IW
1.00
0.8
0.87
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.10
1.15
EL
L
II
Snow
Factor
IS
ED
Seismic
Factor
IE
Nature of Occupancy
AN
III
1.25
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Occupancy
Category
Wind
Factor
IW
ED
Snow
Factor
IS
1.20
1.15
Not
Required
1.50
1.70
1.50
AN
EL
L
IV
Seismic
Factor
IE
Nature of Occupancy
2-1.2.6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
1604.11 Fall Prevention and Protection [Addition]
ED
Fall prevention and protection shall be considered at a facility whenever there is a need
or requirement to perform maintenance work at high locations, deliver material to or
store equipment at heights as defined by OSHA 29 CFR 1926, subpart M, 29 CFR
1910, subpart D, American National Standards Institute ANSI A1264.1, and ANSI Z359
Fall Protection Code. At the planning and design phase of a project, fall hazards shall
be considered and eliminated whenever possible. When elimination or prevention of fall
hazards is not feasible, the design shall include certified and labeled anchorages
meeting the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.502, subpart M, and the American
National Standards Institute, ANSI Z359. Where fall protection is required in the vicinity
of weight-handling equipment, care must be taken to prevent potential conflicts between
the weight-handling equipment and the fall protection measures.
2-1.2.6.1 1604.11.1 Loads [Addition]
EL
L
Fall protection loads (including dynamic / impact) shall be considered as live loads when
applying the load combinations of Section 1605.
2-1.2.6.2 1604.11.2 Load Combinations [Addition]
Fall protection loads need not be combined with roof live loads or with more than threefourths of the snow load or one-half of the wind load.
2-1.2.6.3 1604.11.3 Impact [Addition]
Section 1607
LIVE LOADS
AN
2-1.3
For the purpose of design, fall protection loads (fall arrest forces) shall be increased 100
percent to allow for impact.
Table D-1 of this UFC includes IBC Table 1607.1 with additional Occupancy or Use
classifications for military facilities. The additional classifications that have been added
to IBC Table 1607.1 are shown in bold italics within Table D-1.
2-1.3.1
Live loads are those loads defined in Section 1602.1. Table D-1 of UFC 3-301-01
defines minimum uniformly distributed live loads and minimum concentrated live loads
for the design of structures.
2-1.3.2
Replace Table 1607.1 of the IBC with Table D-1 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC
to Table 1607.1 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table D-1 of this UFC.)
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-1.4
Section 1608
2-1.4.1
SNOW LOADS
Ground snow loads at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and
possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01, to facilitate consistent
interpretation of the information provided in Figure 1608.2 and Table 1608.2.
2-1.4.2
2-1.4.3
ED
Ground snow loads at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories
and possessions are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the
ground snow load is not provided, use the best available locality information. For
additional guidance contact the authorizing design agency.
1608.5 Snow Load Case Studies [Addition]
EL
L
Snow load case studies may be done to clarify and refine snow loadings at site-specific
locations with the approval of the authorizing design agency. The methodology used to
conduct snow load case studies at site-specific locations is presented in the Cold
Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) report Snow Loads for the
United States.
2-1.5
Section 1609
2-1.5.1
WIND LOADS
AN
WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION. For locations within the United States and its
territories and possessions, portions of hurricane-prone regions that are within 1 mile
(1.61 km) of the coastal mean high water line where the basic wind speed is 100 mph
(48 m/s) or greater; or portions of hurricane-prone regions where the basic wind speed
is 120 mph (53 m/s) or greater; or Hawaii.
For locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions, regions
where the basic wind speed is 120 mph (53 m/s) or greater.
2-1.5.2
Basic wind speeds at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and
possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate consistent
interpretation of the information provided in Figure 1609.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-1.5.3
Basic wind speeds at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories
and possessions are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the
basic wind speed is not provided, use the best available locality information. For
additional guidance contact the authorizing design agency.
Use a minimum wind speed of 85 mph (137 km/h) at all locations unless a lower
wind speed is approved by the authorizing design agency.
1609.3.3 Wind Speed Conversion [Addition]
ED
2-1.5.4
When required, the 3-second gust basic wind speeds of Figure 1609 shall be converted
to fastest-mile wind speeds, Vfm, using Table 1609.3.1 or Equation 16-34.
Vfm=(V3S-10.5)/1.05
where:
EL
L
(Equation 16-34)
Section 1613
2-1.6.1
EARTHQUAKE LOADS
AN
Seismic acceleration parameters at DoD installations within the United States and its
territories and possessions are identified in Table E-2 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate
consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figures 1613.5(1) through
1613.5(14).
The values in Table E-2 were determined utilizing the web-based United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters Calculator, Version
5.0.8, for the 2006 version of the International Building Code, utilizing latitude and
longitude data. This tool or other approved software may be used to determine seismic
design data where site-specific location information is available, with the approval of the
authorizing design agency.
The seismic acceleration parameters in Table E-2 were typically determined at the
approximate geographical centroid of the installation / city. For larger installations and
where the potential seismic accelerations vary considerably over relatively short
distances, it may not be appropriate to use the acceleration values at the installation
centroid. At select locations the maximum and minimum values of SS and S1 within the
installation are listed. Use the maximum values unless site-specific location (latitude /
longitude) information is available and lesser values can be justified by the use of
Figures 1613.5(1) through 1613.5(14) or by approved computerized tools for
determining seismic ground motion parameters. For additional guidance contact the
authorizing design agency.
10
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-1.6.2
ED
Seismic ground motion parameters SS and S1 at specific locations outside of the United
States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-2 and G-1 of UFC 3301-01. For locations not shown, the best available information shall be used with the
approval of the authorizing design agency. Appendix H includes available seismic
spectral acceleration maps at selected locations outside of the United States. These
maps may be used to interpolate the seismic ground motions at locations that are not
identified in Tables F-2 and G-1.
2-2
2-2.1
Section 1703
2-2.1.1
EL
L
APPROVALS
2-2.1.2
AN
2-2.1.2
2-3.1
Section 1805
2-3.1.1
2-3
Depths to the frost line at specific locations within the United States and its territories
and possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01. Frost line depths at
specific locations outside of the United States are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-30101. At locations where frost depths are not provided, use the best available locality
information. For additional guidance contact the authorizing design agency.
11
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-3.1.2
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Design foundations in accordance with
ACI 351.3R, ACI 350.4R and UFC 3-220-10N.
2-3.1.3
ED
For footings over three feet (914 mm) thick, the minimum ratio of reinforcement area to
gross concrete area in each direction shall be 0.0015, with not less than one-half nor
more than two-thirds of the total reinforcement required placed in any one face.
Minimum bar size shall be No. 4 (#13M) with a maximum spacing of 12 inches (305
mm).
2-4
CHAPTER 19 CONCRETE
2-4.1
Section 1901
2-4.1.1
EL
L
General
Section 1907
2-4.2.1
Details of Reinforcement
AN
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: In a marine environment where concrete
is subjected to salt-water wave action and spray, reinforcement protection shall be in
accordance with ACI 357R.
2-4.3
Section 1910
2-4.3.1
Replace the first line of the paragraph to read: The thickness of concrete floor slabs
supported directly on the ground shall not be less than 4 inches (102 mm).
2-4.3.2
Slabs-on-ground shall be designed in accordance with ACI 360R, except slabs-onground supporting aircraft loading shall be designed in accordance with UFC 3-260-02.
12
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-4.3.2.1 1910.2.1 Wall Loads on Slab-on
-Ground [Addition]
Slabs-on-ground shall have adequate thickness to support wall line load as indicated in
Tables 2-3 and 2-4. The thickened portion shall have a minimum width as shown in
Figure 2-1.
2-4.3.2.2 1910.2.2 Slab-on-Ground Over Permafrost [Addition]
ED
AN
EL
L
13
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
AN
EL
L
Thickness of
Thickened Floor
Slab, te (inches)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ED
TABLE 2-3
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD
NEAR CENTER OF SLAB OR NEAR KEYED OR DOWELED JOINTS
14
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
EL
L
Thickness of
Thickened Floor
Slab, te (inches)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ED
TABLE 2-4
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD
NEAR FREE EDGE
AN
Notes for Table 2-3 and Table 2-4: The allowable wall loads are based on a modulus of
subgrade reaction (k) of 100 pounds per cubic inch. The thickness of the thickened slab
will be computed by multiplying the above thickness by a constant factor. Constants for
other subgrade moduli are tabulated below.
25
50
100
200
300
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
Modulus of
Subgrade
Reaction (k)
Constant Factor
For other modulus of subgrade reaction values the constant values may be found from
the equation 5 100 / k .
a
For this application the flexural strength of concrete was assumed equal to
9 f ' c where fc is the specified compressive strength of concrete (lb/in2).
15
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ED
FIGURE 2-1
WIDTHS OF THICKENED SLABS AND SLAB EDGE CONDITIONS UNDER WALL
LOADS
EL
L
AN
16
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-5
CHAPTER 21 MASONRY
2-5.1
Section 2101
2-5.1.1
GENERAL
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced
unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are
not imparted to the element.
2-5.1.2
2-5.1.3
ED
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced
unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are
not imparted to the element.
2101.2.4 Empirical Design [Replacement]
2-5.1.4
EL
L
Section 2103
AN
2-5.2
Shear walls shall be running bond construction only; stack bond construction is not
permitted.
2-5.2.1
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be
continuous around wall corners and through wall intersections, unless the intersecting
walls are separated. Reinforcement that is spliced in accordance with the applicable
provisions of ACI 530 shall be considered continuous.
2-5.2.2
Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Corrugated metal brick ties shall not
be used.
17
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-5.3
Section 2104
2-5.3.1
CONSTRUCTION
Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Masonry walls below grade shall be
grouted solid.
2-5.3.2
2-5.3.3
ED
Spacing and placement of control joints shall be in accordance with NCMA TEK 10-2B
or 10-3.
2104.7 Vertical Brick Expansion Joints [Addition]
2-5.4
EL
L
Spacing, placement, and size of vertical brick expansion joints shall be in accordance
with BIA Technical Notes 18 and 18A.
Section 2109 EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF MASONRY [Deletion]
CHAPTER 22 STEEL
2-6.1
Section 2204
2-6.1.1
CONNECTIONS
AN
Section 2205
2-6.2.1
STRUCTURAL STEEL
Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Structural steel floor framing systems
shall be designed for vibration serviceability in accordance with AISC Design Guide 11.
18
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-6.2.2
ED
Section 2209
2-6.3.1
COLD-FORMED STEEL
EL
L
Design of steel deck diaphragms for in-plane loads shall be in accordance with the SDI
DDM03. Design of steel deck for out-of-plane loads shall be in accordance with SDI
Design Manual No. 31.
2-6.4
2-6.4.1
2-6.4.2
Diagonal bracing material shall be ASTM A653 steel without rerolling, which induces
strain hardening and reduces the elongation of the material which is not desirable for
performance under seismic loading.
2210.8 Wall Studs and Wall Stud Assemblies [Addition]
AN
Wall studs shall be designed on the basis of an all steel system in accordance with
chapter C and D4(a) of AISI 2001. Studs shall not be designed on the basis of
Sheathing Braced Design as described in Chapter D4(b) of AISI 2001.
Require that wall stud assemblies be constructed so that the studs are firmly placed in
the track prior to attachment, with no gaps between the wall stud and the attached track.
All wall studs in bending shall have stiffened or partially stiffened compression flanges.
Unstiffened compression flanges shall not be allowed. Require that all strap bracing be
anchored to solid blocking.
2-6.4.3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
2-6.4.4
Design of steel stud backup for brick veneer shall follow the recommendations from BIA
Technical Note 28B. In particular the recommendations for minimum stud gage,
minimum galvanization, minimum anchorage of studs to track, welding of studs, use of
deflection track, allowable stud deflection, wall sheathing and water-resistant barrier
shall be followed.
2210.11 Cold-Formed Steel Connections [Addition]
ED
2-6.4.5
AN
EL
L
Cold-formed steel members exposed to spray from salt, salt water, brackish water, or
seawater, shall be galvanized per ASTM A653 G90 and all fasteners shall be corrosionresistant.
20
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CHAPTER 3 OTHER STRUCTURES
3-1
3-3
ED
Design of railroad bridges shall be in accordance with the AREMA Manual for Railway
Engineering.
3-4
EL
L
Design of tanks for liquid storage shall be in accordance with NFPA 22, AWWA D100,
AWWA D103, AWWA D110 and AWWA D120 as applicable.
TANKS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE
Design of tanks for petroleum storage shall be in accordance with UFC 3-460-01.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONCRETE STRUCTURES
3-5
AN
3-7
Design of water treatment facilities shall be in accordance with the WEF Manual of
Practice 8.
3-8
21
3-9
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ANTENNA TOWERS
AN
EL
L
ED
22
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX A REFERENCES
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS:
1. Department of Defense
UFC 1-200-01, General Building
Requirements, 27 November 2007
ED
Department of Defense
Washington, DC
EL
L
AN
A-1
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
UFC 3-460-01, Petroleum Fuel
Facilities, 16 January 2004
UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum
Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings, 8
October 2003
ED
AN
EL
L
A-2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ED
EL
L
AN
A-3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Effective Lengths for Laterally Unbraced
Compression Flanges of Continuous
Beams Near Intermediate Supports, J.
H. Garrett, Jr., G. Haaijer, and K. H.
Klippstein, Proceedings, Sixth Specialty
Conference on Cold-Formed Steel
Structures (http://www.ccfssonline.org/)
ANSI Z359, Fall Protection Code, 2007
ED
AN
EL
L
A-4
9.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ASM Handbook Volume 13B Corrosion:
Materials, 2005
ED
EL
L
13. McGraw-Hill
P.O. Box 182604
Columbus, OH 43272
(877) 833-5524
http://www.mhprofessional.com/
AN
A-5
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Metal Building Systems Manual, 2006
ED
AN
EL
L
A-6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Design Manual No. 31, Design Manual
for Composite Decks, Form Decks and
Roof Decks, 2007
ANSI/TIA-222-G, Structural Standards
for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna
Supporting Structures, 2005
EL
L
ED
AN
A-7
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX B BEST PRACTICES
B-1
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
ED
The IBC and ASCE 7 provide guidance and discussion on establishing drift limits and
load combinations that must be considered in evaluating serviceability. The
establishment of acceptable drift limits requires significant engineering judgment.
Application of a requirement that is too stringent can significantly impact the cost of a
structure. Requirements that are too lax can lead to damage of rigidly connected
components.
EL
L
The Metal Building Systems Manual provides guidance for allowable drift due to wind
loads for pre-engineered metal buildings, and serviceability recommendations for metal
buildings can also be found in Chapter L of AISC 360 with additional guidance in AISC
Steel Design Guide 3.
When separate support columns are used for top-running cranes, they must be
supported so that differential movement between the crane columns and building
columns, due to differences in stiffness, does not overstress either column and result in
local column buckling.
Recommendations for the spacing of expansion joints can be found in NAS Technical
Report No. 65.
AN
B-2
Moment frame reactions from metal building gable bents have horizontal thrusts at
column bases which can be resisted by several methods. For large thrust forces (40 to
50 kips (118 kN to 222 kN)), tie rods are usually cost-effective. The tie rod can be
embedded in a thickened slab or as part of a tie beam between column foundations.
Where reinforcement is used as a tension tie, splices shall be made with a full
mechanical or full welded splice per chapter 12 of ACI 318. For smaller thrust forces,
hairpin rebar may be used to transfer the thrust force from the column anchor bolts into
the slab-on-ground reinforcement which acts as the tie between the columns. However,
each of these methods requires close attention to detailing of control joints in the slab,
isolation joints around a foundation pier and other possible interruptions in the
continuous slab reinforcement between columns. Also, future renovation that might
require trenching across the continuous slab reinforcement could result in the loss of the
tension tie. A third method is to design the foundation for an overturning moment due to
the thrust force at the base of the column. Each of these methods can provide the
B-1
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
necessary resistance to the thrust force, but need to be evaluated for each project
condition. For further discussion on the design of foundations for gable bent reactions,
refer to Metal Building Systems by Alexander Newman.
B-2.2 Footings on Expansive Soils
CONCRETE
EL
L
B-3
ED
AN
For slabs-on-ground it is recommended that the control joints align across the building
floor plate to avoid joints ending abruptly along the length or width of a panel. Joints
that end abruptly at an adjacent panel edge could cause a crack to propagate into the
adjacent panel. For locations where placement of joints at a panel edge are
unavoidable, refer to UFC 3-320-06A for additional reinforcement requirements to
minimize crack propagation.
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
MASONRY
ED
B-5
STEEL
EL
L
The base of the masonry veneer should be placed on a shelf angle or a foundation
ledge that is lower than the base of the steel stud wall by at least 4 inches (102 mm).
The width of this shelf angle or foundation ledge will include the width of the masonry
veneer and the cavity. This width should not be less than two-thirds of the veneer
thickness plus the minimum air space.
AN
Shelf angles should be hot-dip galvanized structural steel members. Angles should be
provided in segments approximately 10 feet (3 m) in length, with gaps between
segments. Shelf angles should be detailed to allow enough gaps for thermal expansion
and contraction of the steel in angle runs and at building corners. Corners of buildings
should have corner pieces with each leg no less than 4 feet (1.2 m) in length where
possible.
Limit deflection of horizontal legs of shelf angles under masonry loading to 1/16 inch
(1.6 mm) at the end of the horizontal leg. Rotation of the shelf angle support should be
included in the 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) deflection limit for the horizontal leg displacement
calculation.
B-3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
B-5.3 Cold-Formed Continuous Beams and Joists
Guidance on determining the effective length of the unbraced compression flange for
cold-formed continuous beams and joists can be found in AISI Effective Lengths for
Laterally Unbraced Compression Flanges of Continuous Beams Near Intermediate
Supports.
B-5.4 Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Wall Detailing
ED
Recommended details for masonry veneer/steel stud wall assemblies can be found in
BIA Technical Note 28B.
B-5.5 Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments
AN
EL
L
B-5.6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Steel Structures in Arctic and Antarctic Zones
For carbon steel, the transition from ductile to brittle behavior occurs within
temperatures to be expected in Arctic and Antarctic zones. Ductility is important for
structures in high seismic areas. Toughness, a characteristic also affected by cold
temperatures, is important for structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact
loadings. Design of structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact loads in cold
climates, should include consideration of the following measures to mitigate potential
fatigue and fracture problems:
AN
EL
L
ED
B-5
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX C ABBREVIATIONS
10/50 SS. Spectral acceleration of 5% damped short period (0.2 second) response
corresponding to an earthquake with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years
10/50 S1. Spectral acceleration of 5% damped long period (1.0 second) response
corresponding to an earthquake with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years
ED
CS Case Study
DOD . Department of Defense
%g Percent Gravity
Square Feet
EL
L
ft2 .
kN . Kilonewton
AN
kPa Kilopascal
lbs Pounds
lb/ft2
lb/in2
lb/ft .
m .. Meter
m2
Square Meter
Millimeter
C-1
mm2 .
Square Millimeter
MPa .
Megapascal
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
S1
ED
SS
AN
V Velocity
EL
L
m micrometer (micron)
C-2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX D
MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM
CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS
D-1 REFERENCES. All section references are to the International Building Code
(IBC) 2006. Table D-1 includes the IBC 2006 Table 1607.1 with additional Occupancy
or Use classification for military facilities that are shown in bold italics.
OCCUPANCY OR USE
ED
50
100
8.9
8.9
2,000
2,000
23.9
23.9
23.9
23.9
16.8
7.2
500
500
500
500
350
150
-------------
-------------
2.9
60
---
---
2.4
4.8
4.8
6.0
4.8
50
100
100
125
100
-----------
-----------
2.9
9.6
9.6
3.6
1.9
3.6
60
200
200
75
40
75
--------1.33
---
--------300
---
19.2
14.4
400
300
-----
-----
2.9
2.9
60
60
-----
-----
4.8
100
---
---
AN
EL
L
CONCENTRATED
(kN)
(lbs.)
D-1
15.
16.
17.
18.
UNIFORM
(kPa)
(psf)
Court rooms
Dance halls and ballrooms
Dining rooms and restaurants
Decks
80
100
100
Same as
Occupancy
h
Served
-----
--4.8
1.9
14.4
12.0
-------
-------
---
---
--1.33
--300
---
0.89
200
100
40
---
---
---
---
300
250
EL
L
3.8
4.8
4.8
Same as
Occupancy
h
Served
-----
ED
OCCUPANCY OR USE
9.6
200
12.0
4.8
1.9
See Section
1607.6 - IBC
9.6
---
250
100
40
See Section
1607.6 - IBC
200
---
Note a
See Section
1607.6 - IBC
-----
Note a
See Section
1607.6 - IBC
-----
3.6
4.8
75
100
-----
-----
See Section
1607.7 - IBC
See Section
1607.7 - IBC
See Section
1607.7 - IBC
See Section
1607.7 - IBC
3.8
2.9
1.9
80
60
40
4.45
4.45
4.45
1,000
1,000
1,000
--7.2
6.0
--150
125
-------
-------
3.6
75
---
---
2.9
b
7.2
3.8
60
b
150
80
4.45
4.45
4.45
1,000
1,000
1,000
6.0
12.0
3.6
125
250
75
8.9
13.34
---
2,000
3,000
---
AN
30. Hospitals
Corridors above first floor
Operating rooms, laboratories
Private rooms
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CONCENTRATED
(kN)
(lbs.)
D-2
UNIFORM
(kPa)
(psf)
100
125
-----
-----
7.2
4.8
150
100
-----
-----
4.8
2.4
3.8
1.9
4.8
100
8.9
2,000
50
80
8.9
8.9
2,000
2,000
40
100
---
---
EL
L
4.8
6.0
ED
OCCUPANCY OR USE
4.8
6.0
9.6
4.8
2.9
4.8
4.8
100
125
200
100
60
100
100
---
---
-----------
-----------
7.2
150
---
---
9.6
12.0
13.2
200
250
275
-------
-------
0.5
10
---
---
1.0
20
---
---
1.4
30
---
---
1.9
40
---
---
1.9
40
---
---
4.8
Note c
100
Note c
--Note c
--Note c
AN
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CONCENTRATED
(kN)
(lbs.)
D-3
UNIFORM
(kPa)
(psf)
---
---
1.33
300
0.23
Nonreduceable
5
Nonreduceable
---
---
1.0
1.0
20
20
-----
-----
---
---
EL
L
54. Roofs
All roof surfaces subject to
maintenance workers
Awnings and canopies
Fabric construction supported
by a light weight rigid
skeleton structure
All other construction
Ordinary flat, pitched, and curved
roofs
Primary roof members, exposed
to a work floor:
Single panel point of lower
chord of roof trusses or any
point along primary
structural members
supporting roofs:
Over manufacturing, storage
warehouses, and repair
garages
All other occupancies
Roofs used for special purposes
Roofs used for promenade
purposes
Roofs used for roof gardens or
assembly purposes
55. Schools
Classrooms
Corridors above first floor
First floor corridors
56. Scuttles, skylight ribs, and
accessible ceilings
57. Shops: Manufacturing and
Industrial
Aircraft utility
Assembly and repair
Bombsight (w/o shielding)
Carpenter
Electrical
Engine overhaul
58. Sidewalks, vehicular driveways
and yards, subject to trucking
59. Skating rinks
60. Stadiums and arenas
Bleachers
Fixed seats (fastened to floor)
61. Stairs and exits
One- and two-family dwellings
All other
ED
OCCUPANCY OR USE
8.9
2000
300
Note l
---
--Note l
2.9
--Note l
60
1.33
Note l
---
4.8
100
---
1.9
3.8
4.8
40
80
100
4.45
4.45
4.45
1,000
1,000
1,000
---
---
0.89
200
9.6
12.0
6.0
6.0
14.4
14.4
d
12.0
200
250
125
125
300
300
d
250
------------e
35.6
------------e
8,000
4.8
100
---
---
4.8
c
2.9
100
c
60
---
---
1.9
4.8
40
100
Note f
Note f
AN
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CONCENTRATED
(kN)
(lbs.)
D-4
---
OCCUPANCY OR USE
UNIFORM
(kPa)
(psf)
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
CONCENTRATED
(kN)
(lbs.)
64.
65.
66.
4.8
3.6
6.0
3.6
125
250
200
250
200
300
300
150
1000
500
300
---
100
75
125
75
4.45
4.45
4.45
---
1,000
1,000
1,000
---
7.2
150
8.9
2000
See Section
1607.7.3 - IBC
See Section
1607.7.3 - IBC
See Section
1607.7.3 IBC
See Section
1607.7.3 - IBC
60
85
100
---
---
---
---
---
ED
6.0
11.97
9.58
11.97
9.58
14.36
14.36
7.2
47.88
23.94
14.36
EL
L
63.
General
Light
Heavy
Aircraft
Building Materials
Drugs, paint, oil
Dry Provisions
Groceries, wine, Liquor
Light Tools
Pipe & metal
Paint and oil (one story)
Hardware
Stores
Retail
First floor
Upper floors
Wholesale, all floors
Tailor shop
Telephone exchange rooms
and central computer IT
server spaces
Vehicle barriers
AN
2.9
4.1
4.8
D-5
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Notes to Table D-1, MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND
MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS
For SI: 1 square inch = 645.16 mm2, 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kN/m2 = 0.0479
kPa, 1 pound = 0.004448 kN, 1 pound per cubic foot = 16 kg/m3.
ED
a. Floors in garages or portions of building used for the storage of motor vehicles shall
be designed for the uniformly distributed live loads shown or the following
concentrated loads: (1) for passenger cars accommodating not more than nine
passengers, 3,000 pounds (13.34 kN) acting on an area of 4.5 inches x 4.5 inches
(114 mm x 114 mm); (2) for mechanical parking structures without slab or deck
which are used for storing passenger vehicles only, 2,250 pounds (10.0 kN) per
wheel.
b. The loading applies to stack room floors that support non-mobile, double-faced
library book stacks, subject to the following limitations:
EL
L
1) The nominal book stack unit height shall not exceed 90 inches (2,290mm).
2) The nominal shelf depth shall not exceed 12 inches (305mm) for each face; and
3) Parallel rows of double-faced book stacks shall be separated by aisles not less
than 36 inches (915 mm) wide.
c. Design in accordance with the ICC Standard on Bleachers, Folding and Telescoping
Seating and Grandstands.
AN
g. Where snow loads occur that are in excess of the design conditions, the structure
shall be designed to support the loads due to the increased loads caused by drift
buildup or a greater snow design determined by the building official. (See IBC
Section 1608). For special-purpose roofs, see IBC Section 1607.11.2.2.
h. See IBC Section 1604.8.3 for decks attached to exterior walls.
i.
Attics without storage are those where the maximum clear height between the joist
and rafter is less than 42 inches (1067 mm), or where there are not two or more
adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of containing a rectangle
42 inches (1067 mm) high by 2 feet (610 mm) wide, or greater, located within the
D-6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
plane of the truss. For attics without storage, this live load need not be assumed to
act concurrently with any other live load requirements.
j.
For attics with limited storage and constructed with trusses, this live load need only
be applied to those portions of the bottom chord where there are two or more
adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of containing a rectangle
42 inches (1067 mm) high by 2 feet (610 mm) wide or greater, located within the
plane of the truss. The rectangle shall fit between the top of the bottom chord and
the bottom of any other truss member, provided that each of the following criteria is
met:
ED
EL
L
3) Bottom chords of trusses shall be designed for the greater of actual imposed
dead load or 10 psf (0.5 kPa), uniformly distributed over the entire span.
k. Attic spaces served by a fixed stair shall be signed to support the minimum live load
specified for habitable attics and sleeping rooms.
Roofs used for other special purposes shall be designed for appropriate loads as
approved by the contracting officer, or the contracting officers designated
representative.
AN
l.
D-7
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX E
SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA
UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS
E-1 Climatic Loading Data Table. Site-specific structural climatic loading data for
DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in
Table E-1.
ED
E-2 Earthquake Loading Data Table. Site-specific earthquake loading data for DoD
locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table E2.
EL
L
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
Base / City
Anniston Army
Depot
Birmingham
Fort McClellan
Fort Rucker
(psf)
(mph)
(inches)
5
5
5
0
90
90
90
107
6
6
6
0
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.00
145
145
145
172
152
152
152
0
5
0
97
130
4
0
0.24
0.00
156
209
102
0
10
60
60
50
60
50
60
60
60
86
56
136
0.48
2.87
2.87
2.40
2.87
2.40
2.87
2.87
2.87
0.00
1.44
2.40
7.66
145
145
145
161
145
177
145
161
169
185
209
196
161
229
30
50
160
90
90
90
100
90
110
90
100
105
115
130
122
100
90
0.00
145
State
Alabama
AN
Maxwell-Gunther
AFB / Montgomery
Mobile
Redstone Arsenal /
Huntsville
Clear AS
Eielson AFB
Elmendorf AFB
Fort Greely
Fort Richardson
Fort Wainwright
Galena AFB
Juneau
Ketchikan
Kodiak
Sitka
Valdez
Davis-Monthan
AFB / Tucson AFB
Alaska
Arizona
E-1
permafrost
129
Permafrost
129
permafrost
86
(kPa) (km/h)
(mm)
permafrost
3277
permafrost
3277
permafrost
2184
2184
1422
3454
0
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
Arkansas
(psf)
10
(mph)
90
(inches)
0
0
0
0
90
90
90
5
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
145
145
145
127
0
0
90
0.00
145
10
10
0
0
0
90
90
85
85
85
(kPa) (km/h)
0.48
145
14
9
18
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
(mm)
0
145
145
137
137
137
356
229
161
914
150
100
36
7.19
0.00
22
137
137
0.00 Special
457
85
85
Special
NSWC Corona
85
0.00
137
NRTF Dixon
102
0.00
22
0
22
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
137
137
Special
137
137
137
559
0
559
0
559
Edwards AFB
El Centro NAF
Fort Irwin
Fresno ANG
0
0
0
0
85
85
Special
85
85
85
NAS Lemoore
Los Angeles AFB /
El Segundo
85
0.00
137
85
0.00
137
Los Angeles
85
0.00
137
85
0.00
137
85
0.00
137
127
85
22
0.00
137
559
85
0.00
137
102
85
0.00
137
AN
California
Base / City
Fort Huachuca
Luke Air Force
Base
Phoenix
MCAS Yuma
Yuma Proving
Ground
EL
L
State
Arizona
ED
TABLE E-1
March ARB
McClellan AFB /
Sacramento
NWC Mohave
Range
Presidio of
Monterey
Point Mugu / Port
Hueneme
E-2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
(psf)
(mph)
(inches)
85
85
85
0
0
85
85
(kPa) (km/h)
0.00
AN
Colorado
Fort Carson
Cheyenne
Mountain AS /
NORAD
Peterson AFB /
Colorado Springs
Schriever AFB
Connecticut
Delaware
USAF Academy
NSB New London /
Groton
Dover AFB
137
0.00
137
0.00
137
0
0
0.00
0.00
137
137
0
0
85
0.00
137
15
85
54
0.72
137
1372
0
0
85
85
4
0
0.00
0.00
137
137
102
0
0
0
85
85
5
0
0.00
0.00
137
137
127
0
20
20
52
52
0.96
0.96
15
90
90
90
Special
15
90
Special
(mm)
ED
Base / City
San Diego Region
NAS North Island
NAB Coronada
MCRD
MCAS Miramar
Naval Medical Ctr
San Diego NS
Point Loma
Moffett Field Onizuka /
Sunnyvale
San Clemente
Island Naval
Reservation
EL
L
State
California
30
CS
38
145
145
145
0.72 Special
38
145
0.72 Special
38
30
90
90
90
Special
30
25
120
95
E-3
1.44
CS
1321
1321
965
965
965
38
145
145
145
1.44 Special
38
22
1.44
1.20
965
559
193
153
965
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
(psf)
(mph)
(inches)
25
90
26
110
125
0
0
0
133
150
135
1.20
145
(mm)
660
0.00
177
0.00
201
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
214
241
217
0
0
115
0.00
185
0
0
0
150
120
120
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
241
193
193
0
0
0
140
0.00
225
Orlando
NAS Panama City
0
0
108
130
0
0
0.00
0.00
174
209
0
0
Patrick AFB
NAS Pensacola
Tampa
Tyndall AFB
NAS Whiting Field /
Milton
MCLB Albany
Athens NCSC
Dobbins AFB /
Atlanta NAS
Fort Benning
Fort Gordon
Fort McPherson /
Fort Gillem
0
0
0
0
125
140
118
130
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
201
225
190
209
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
125
98
90
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.24
201
158
145
0
0
5
5
10
90
95
93
0.24
0.24
0.48
145
153
150
90
0.24
145
Eglin AFB
Homestead
Hurlburt Field
AN
NAS Jacksonville /
MCSF Blount Island /
Jacksonville
Georgia
(kPa) (km/h)
ED
Florida
Base / City
Washington
Region
Bolling AFB
Anacostia NS
Fort McNair
Marine Barracks
NRL Washington
NDW / Anacostia
Pentagon
Walter Reed
Avon Park AS
Cape Canaveral
AFS
EL
L
State
District of
Columbia
E-4
0
0
0
0
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
(psf)
(mph)
(inches)
(kPa) (km/h)
Fort Stewart
Hunter Army
Airfield / Savannah
110
0.00
177
120
0.00
193
0
0
5
120
98
92
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.24
193
158
148
0
0
0
105
105
105
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
105
0.00
169
0.00
169
169
0.00
169
0.00
169
0.48
0.48
145
145
Scott AFB
Springfield
Crane NWSC
Grissom ARB
Fort Benjamin
Harrison /
Indianapolis
Des Moines
105
10
10
90
90
20
90
64
0.96
145
1626
25
25
90
90
59
64
1.20
1.20
145
145
1499
1626
20
90
64
0.96
145
1626
20
20
20
20
90
90
90
90
38
145
145
145
145
965
36
49
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
914
1245
20
25
90
90
44
82
0.96
1.20
145
145
1118
2083
AN
Idaho
(mm)
EL
L
Hawaii
Base / City
ED
State
Georgia
E-5
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
Louisiana
Maine
(mph)
90
(inches)
54
(kPa) (km/h)
0.96
145
(mm)
1372
Fort Riley
McConnell AFB
Fort Campbell
Fort Knox
Louisville
Richmond
Barksdale AFB
Fort Polk / Leesville
NAS JRB New
Orleans / Belle
Chasse
NAS Brunswick
20
25
15
15
15
15
5
5
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
95
52
38
22
32
32
7
0
0.96
1.20
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.24
0.24
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
153
1321
965
559
813
813
0
178
0
0
50
130
100
0
86
0.00
2.40
209
161
0
2184
NRTF Cutler
PNSY Kittery
Winter Harbor
NSGA
Aberdeen Proving
Ground
50
50
98
100
86
64
2.40
2.40
158
161
2184
1626
50
98
86
2.40
158
2184
25
90
29
1.20
145
737
Adelphi
Andrews AFB
Carderock NSWC /
Bethesda
25
25
90
90
24
26
1.20
1.20
145
145
610
660
25
90
20
1.20
145
508
Bloods Island
Edgewood Arsenal
Fort Detrick /
Fredrick
20
25
102
90
29
0.96
1.20
164
145
737
30
90
29
1.44
145
737
Fort Meade
Indian Head NSWC
25
25
90
90
26
22
1.20
1.20
145
145
660
559
25
90
29
1.20
145
737
20
90
26
0.96
145
660
25
50
90
97
26
64
1.20
2.40
145
156
660
1626
50
100
54
2.40
161
1372
AN
Maryland
(psf)
20
ED
Kentucky
Base / City
Fort Leavenworth
EL
L
State
Kansas
E-6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
State
Base / City
Massachusetts
Natick
Otis AGB /
Falmouth
25
115
Westover ARB
Battle Creek
Detroit Arsenal /
Warren
Selfridge ANG
Base
Minneapolis St
Paul
Stennis / Bay St.
Louis
Columbus AFB
Gulfport
Jackson
Keesler AFB
NAS Meridian
Pascagoula NS
Vicksburg
Fort Leonard Wood
35
30
Montana
161
38
1.20
185
965
95
90
64
1.68
1.44
153
145
1626
25
90
61
1.20
145
1549
25
90
59
1.20
145
1499
50
90
125
2.40
145
3175
0
10
0
5
0
5
0
5
20
130
90
135
92
140
97
150
90
90
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.24
0.96
209
145
217
148
225
156
241
145
145
Kansas City
Overland
St. Louis
Whiteman AFB
Great Falls ANG
20
20
20
20
20
90
90
90
90
90
145
145
145
145
145
1245
38
46
107
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Malmstrom AFB
Offutt AFB
Lincoln
NAS Fallon
Indian Springs AFS
Nellis AFB
20
25
25
5
5
5
90
90
90
90
90
90
107
73
64
23
7
7
0.96
1.20
1.20
0.24
0.24
0.24
145
145
145
145
145
145
2718
1854
1626
584
178
178
Nellis AF Range
Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard
NWS Earle / Colts
Neck
90
0.24
145
178
50
100
64
2.40
161
1626
20
110
0.96
177
25
105
1.20
169
Nebraska
Nevada
New
Hampshire
New Jersey
(mm)
2.40
AN
Missouri
100
(kPa) (km/h)
ED
Mississippi
50
(inches)
EL
L
Minnesota
(mph)
Michigan
(psf)
E-7
7
0
5
0
5
0
36
49
29
178
0
127
0
127
0
914
965
1168
2718
737
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
(psf)
(mph)
(inches)
Fort Monmouth
Lakehurst
McGuire AFB
Picatinny Arsenal
Albuquerque
Cannon AFB
Holloman AFB
20
25
25
35
10
15
5
110
105
105
90
90
90
90
38
29
29
32
18
18
4
0.96
1.20
1.20
1.68
0.48
0.72
0.24
177
169
169
145
145
145
145
965
737
737
813
457
457
102
Kirtland AFB
White Sands
Buffalo
Fort Drum
Fort Hamilton /
Brooklyn
10
5
45
70
(a)
90
90
90
18
4
59
94
0.48
0.24
2.16
3.35
(a)
145
145
145
457
102
1499
2388
25
105
60
90
35
90
50
90
35
40
54
73
West Point
Watervliet Arsenal /
Albany
30
90
90
90
Special
40
New Mexico
(kPa) (km/h)
EL
L
New York
Base / City
North Dakota
Ohio
Pope AFB
Raleigh
Seymour Johnson
AFB
Grand Forks AFB
NRTF La Moure
Minot AFB
Cleveland
1.20
169
86
2.87
145
2184
59
1.68
145
1499
2.40
145
1372
1854
54
145
145
145
1.44 Special
90
82
1.92
145
2083
10
10
128
95
0
0
0.48
0.48
206
153
0
0
10
10
15
130
95
93
0
0
0.48
0.48
0.72
209
153
150
0
0
10
60
40
40
20
100
90
90
90
90
4
156
0.48
2.87
1.92
1.92
0.96
161
145
145
145
145
102
3962
AN
(mm)
ED
State
New Jersey
E-8
163
52
1.68
1.92
1372
4140
1321
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
Base / City
(psf)
DSC Whitehall /
20
Columbus
Wright-Patterson
20
AFB
Youngstown ARS /
20
Vienna
Oklahoma
10
Altus AFB
10
Fort Sill
McAlester Army
10
Ammunition Plant
Tinker AFB /
10
Oklahoma City
10
Tulsa
15
Vance AFB
Oregon
10
Portland
Pennsylvania ARS Coraopolis /
25
Pittsburg
25
Carlisle Barracks
Fort Indiantown
35
Gap / Annville
Letterkenny /
30
Chambersburg
25
Mechanicsburg
25
Philadelphia
New Cumberland /
Defense Depot
25
Susquehanna
Tobyhanna Army
50
Depot
Willow Grove ARS /
30
NAS
Rhode Island NS Newport
30
South Carolina MCAS Beaufort
5
Charleston
Region:
5
Charletion AFB
NWS Charleston
Columbia Region:
McEntire
10
Fort Jackson
Shaw AFB
(mph)
(inches)
(kPa) (km/h)
(mm)
90
46
0.96
145
1168
90
49
0.96
145
1245
14
14
0.96
0.48
0.48
145
145
145
356
356
16
0.48
145
406
17
23
22
14
0.48
0.48
0.72
0.48
145
145
145
137
432
584
559
356
90
90
38
36
1.20
1.20
145
145
965
914
90
49
1.68
145
1245
90
90
90
36
1.44
1.20
1.20
145
145
145
914
1.20
145
52
2.40
145
90
115
122
35
0
1.44
1.44
0.24
145
185
196
0
889
0
125
0
0.24
201
0.48
156
0.00
0.96
201
145
0
2184
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
85
AN
EL
L
State
Ohio
ED
TABLE E-1
0
20
30
90
90
97
125
90
E-9
762
0
0
86
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
(psf)
10
(mph)
90
(inches)
(kPa) (km/h)
0.48
145
10
90
0.48
145
10
10
90
90
22
0.48
0.48
145
145
559
90
0.24
145
178
0
5
5
130
90
90
0
7
7
0.00
0.24
0.24
209
145
145
0
178
178
115
0.00
185
EL
L
Texas
Base / City
Arnold AFB
NSWC LCC /
Memphis
NSA Mid-South /
Millington
Nashville
NAS JRB, Carswell
/ Fort Worth
90
0.24
145
5
5
0
0
0
90
90
130
115
90
6
5
0
0
0
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
145
145
209
185
145
152
127
0
0
0
90
0.24
145
203
90
0.24
145
90
11
0.24
145
279
10
40
15
90
90
90
54
73
59
0.48
1.92
0.72
145
145
145
1372
1854
1499
25
25
90
90
52
1.20
1.20
145
145
1321
10
25
25
15
115
90
90
97
0.48
1.20
1.20
0.72
185
145
145
156
127
AN
Dugway Proving
Ground
Hill AFB
Salt Lake City
Utah
Virginia
(mm)
ED
State
Tennessee
E-10
26
9
660
229
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
Base / City
(psf)
20
Fort Lee
10
Fort Monroe
25
Fort Myer
10
Fort Story
Henderson Hall /
25
Arlington
Langley AFB /
10
Hampton
10
NAB Little Creek
Norfolk Region:
Camp Elmore
10
Craney Island
Depot
Norfolk Naval Base
Norfolk Shipyard
Naval Hospital /
10
Portsmouth
(mph)
90
105
90
113
(inches)
14
9
26
9
90
26
105
110
107
(kPa) (km/h)
0.96
145
0.48
169
1.20
145
0.48
182
1.20
660
0.48
0.48
169
177
229
229
0.48
172
229
105
0.48
169
229
10
105
0.48
169
229
NAS Oceana /
Virginia Beach
MCB Quantico
10
25
113
90
9
22
0.48
1.20
182
145
229
559
1.20
145
NSA Northwest /
Chesapeake
AN
25
Radford AAP
Defense Supply Ctr
20
/ Richmond
20
Wallops Island
Yorktown Region:
Camp Perry
15
Cheatham Annex
Yorktown NWS
15 (b)
NS Everett
42
Fairchild AFB
Fort Lewis /
15 (b)
Tacoma
Indian Island SWC 15 (b)
Washington
145
(mm)
356
229
660
229
9
9
EL
L
State
Virginia
ED
TABLE E-1
90
90
115
18
0.96
0.96
145
185
457
95
0.72
153
229
85
85
64
0.72(b)
2.01
137
137
1626
85
0.72(b)
137
229
0.72(b)
0.72(b)
137
137
15 (b)
85
85
15 (b)
85
0.72(b)
137
229
15
85
0.72
137
229
E-11
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE E-1
Wyoming
American
Samoa
Mariana
Islands
85
CS
30
20
30
40
90
90
90
90
90
30
30
F. E. Warren AFB
Pago Pago / Tutuila
Island
Guam
0.72(b)
0.72(b)
137
(mm)
229
137
0.72
137
229
22
38
114
CS
1.44
0.96
1.44
1.92
145
145
145
145
145
559
965
2896
90
90
75
75
1.44
1.44
145
145
1905
1905
20
90
59
0.96
145
1499
125
0.00
201
170
0.00
274
Saipan / Tinian
150
0.00
241
All
145
0.00
233
AN
Puerto Rico
15
(kPa) (km/h)
ED
Wisconsin
Seattle
Allegheny Ballistics
Lab
Beckley
Huntington
Sugar Grove NRS
Fort McCoy
General Mitchell
AFRC / Milwaukee
Madison
(inches)
EL
L
West Virginia
Base / City
(psf) (mph)
Puget Sound
Region:
15 (b)
85
Bangor NSB
Bremerton NS
Puget Sound NSY
NAS Whidbey
15 (b)
85
Island / Oak Harbor
State
Washington
E-12
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
ED
CS Site specific case studies are required to establish ground snow loads.
AN
EL
L
Special - Special wind regions where unusual geographic conditions require consideration for potential
unusual wind conditions. The wind speeds shown are minimum values. The potential for higher wind
speeds due to unusual geographic conditions should also be considered.
E-13
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2 EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA
UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS
TABLE E-2
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
28
11
Birmingham
30
10
11
Fort McClellan
28
11
Fort Rucker
Maxwell-Gunther AFB /
Montgomery
11
Mobile
Redstone Arsenal /
Huntsville
Clear AS
Eielson AFB
Elmendorf AFB
Fort Greely
Fort Richardson
Fort Wainwright
Galena AFB
Juneau
Ketchikan
Kodiak
Sitka
Valdez
Davis-Monthan AFB /
Tucson AFB
12
30
108
106
149
81
152
111
35
57
23
179
102
147
11
30
29
55
38
57
31
10
27
14
66
52
57
11
47
44
100
34
101
49
15
27
11
116
52
93
4
14
14
30
14
31
14
4
14
8
37
31
30
28
13
Fort Huachuca
26
12
17
11
18
68
47 Max
20 Min
6
26
23 Max
14 Min
11
37
29 Max
15 Min
3
14
11 Max
6 Min
57
18
14
44
15
11
Alameda
150
60
123
55
MCLB Barstow
133
48
61
22
Beale AFB
44
20
26
11
MCMWTC Bridgeport
110
39
63
21
16
AN
Arizona
Arkansas
California
ED
SS
(%g)
Alaska
Base / City
EL
L
State
Alabama
Phoenix
MCAS Yuma
E-14
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
S1
(%g)
51 Max
42 Min
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
SS
(%g)
139 Max
111 Min
61
25
136 Max
109 Min
45 Max
38 Min
80 Max
61 Min
27 Max
19 Min
169
60
127
47
129
115 Max
86 Min
190 Max
150 Min
197 Max
78 Min
42
59 Max
39 Min
66 Max
60 Min
95 Max
29 Min
85 Max
47 Min
160 Max
128 Min
144 Max
40 Min
39 Max
21 Min
54 Max
39 Min
55 Max
15 Min
49
22
27
12
Base / City
NSWC Corona
NRTF Dixon
Edwards AFB
El Centro NAF
Fort Irwin
EL
L
Fresno ANG
NAS Lemoore
Los Angeles AFB / El
Segundo
89
33
49
20
150
60
113
39
Los Angeles
188
68
119
42
150
60
127
50
48
197 Max
94 Min
22
95 Max
33 Min
28
106 Max
49 Min
13
36 Max
20 Min
151
63
105
37
219
91
128
54
146
157
163
137
155
140
154
56
63
65
51
60
54
61
66.4
62.8
67.5
64.8
63.4
60.8
72.5
24.8
22.8
25.4
24.1
24.3
22.2
26.1
150
60
125
57
83
26
31
12
62
22
26
10
164
61
110
37
March ARB
McClellan AFB /
Sacremento
AN
C
ED
State
California
E-15
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
Base / City
Seal Beach NWS
Concord Detachment
Sierra Army Depot /
Herlong
SS
(%g)
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
150
60
145
55
95
35
48
16
148
48
76
26
186
162 Max
88 Min
138 Max
105 Min
60
58 Max
30 Min
49 Max
36 Min
111
102 Max
39 Min
64 Max
53 Min
37
32 Max
14 Min
24 Max
19 Min
20
Denver
21
Fort Carson
Cheyenne Mountain AS /
NORAD
Peterson AFB / Colorado
Springs
21
21
20
Schriever AFB
19
Travis AFB
MCB Twentynine Palms
EL
L
Vandenberg AFB
Colorado
ED
State
California
22
21
Delaware
Dover AFB
Washington Region
Bolling AFB
Anacostia NS
Fort McNair
Marine Barracks
NRL Washington
NDW / Anacostia
Pentagon
Walter Reed
16
15
Avon Park AS
Eglin AFB
10
Homestead
Hurlburt Field
NAS Jacksonville / MCSF
Blount Island / Jacksonville
5
9
2
5
1
3
0
2
14
MacDill AFB
AN
District of
Columbia
USAF Academy
Connecticut
Florida
E-16
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
NAS Mayport
15
HQ Southcom / Miami
Orlando
10
Patrick AFB
NAS Pensacola
10
Tampa
Tyndall AFB
11
MCLB Albany
13
Athens NCSC
Dobbins AFB / Atlanta
NAS
26
12
25
11
Fort Benning
15
Fort Gordon
Fort McPherson / Fort
Gillem
33
11
14
22
10
Fort Stewart
Hunter Army Airfield /
Savannah
29
10
38
12
12
17
Moody AFB
13
Robins AFB
PMRF Barking Sands,
Kauai
19
19
63
18
8
30
2
8
61
18
29
150
60
AN
EL
L
Georgia
Base / City
SS
(%g)
ED
State
Florida
Hawaii
E-17
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
59
17
28
Boise ANG
42
30
12
10
17
16
5
5
26
15
Great Lakes
14
13
Scott AFB
66
Springfield
27
Base / City
Wahiawa Region:
Lualualei
Wahiawa Naval Res
Wheeler AFB
Schofield Barracks
ARD Bayview
Maine
Maryland
14
19
24
11
10
35
15
12
7
13
6
4
3
18
8
8
4
7
3
3
1
Fort Leavenworth
13
Fort Riley
19
14
74 Max
59 Min
5
22 Max
19 Min
5
24 Max
18 Min
2
6 Max
6 Min
Fort Knox
26
11
10
Louisville
25
10
10
Richmond
23
10
Barksdale AFB
16
12
11
NAS Brunswick
30
12
NRTF Cutler
27
PNSY Kittery
Winter Harbour NSGA
36
21
8
6
13
8
4
3
20
Adelphi
Andrews AFB
16
15
5
5
6
6
2
2
Fort Campbell
AN
Louisiana
Crane NWSC
Grissom ARB
Fort Benjamin Harrison /
Indianapolis
Des Moines
McConnell AFB
Kentucky
ED
Illinois
S1
(%g)
EL
L
Idaho
SS
(%g)
State
Hawaii
E-18
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
SS
(%g)
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
16
12
19
5
5
5
6
5
7
2
2
2
16
16
16
5
5
5
7
6
7
2
2
2
18
28
Hanscom AFB
28
Natick
Base / City
Carderock NSWC /
Bethesda
Bloods Island
Edgewood Arsenal
ED
State
Maryland
11
11
26
10
20
Westover ARB
23
Battle Creek
11
12
11
Minnesota
Minneapolis St Paul
Mississippi
12
Columbus AFB
28
11
Gulfport
12
Jackson
20
Keesler AFB
12
NAS Meridian
20
Pascagoula NS
11
Vicksburg
20
30
12
10
Kansas City
13
Overland
52
16
19
St. Louis
58
17
21
Whiteman AFB
14
23
13
Malmstrom AFB
20
12
EL
L
AN
Michigan
16
Massachusetts
14
Missouri
Montana
E-19
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
Nevada
Base / City
SS
(%g)
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
Offutt AFB
13
Lincoln
NAS Fallon
18
81
5
29
5
43
2
14
45
16
24
Nellis AFB
50
17
26
70Max
59 Min
26 Max
19 Min
37 Max
28 Min
13 Max
9 Min
36
13
11
10
11
Nellis AF Range
New Hampshire Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard
New Jersey
NWS Earle / Colts Neck
Fort Monmouth
30
Lakehurst
25
10
McGuire AFB
26
10
Picatinny Arsenal
32
12
Albuquerque
55
17
27
Cannon AFB
11
Holloman AFB
32
10
13
Kirtland AFB
56
17
27
White Sands
41
13
13
Buffalo
Fort Drum
Fort Hamilton / Brooklyn
28
30
35
6
8
7
9
12
12
2
4
3
22
28
7
6
9
9
3
2
26
11
28
18
7
6
11
8
3
3
West Point
31
12
23
10
16
Fort Bragg
Jacksonville Region
MCB Camp Lejeune
MCAS New River
29
10
21
Pope AFB
29
10
EL
L
26
AN
New York
New Mexico
30
North Carolina
ED
State
Nebraska
E-20
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
Ohio
Oklahoma
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
Raleigh
20
20
NRTF La Moure
Minot AFB
6
7
2
2
Cleveland
19
15
Wright-Patterson AFB
19
17
Altus AFB
Fort Sill
McAlester Army
Ammunition Plant
Tinker AFB / Oklahoma
City
20
38
Tulsa
Vance AFB
ED
North Dakota
Base / City
SS
(%g)
6
9
6
8
2
2
EL
L
State
North Carolina
21
32
10
16
23
7
6
6
7
2
2
93
32
43
17
Portland
Pennsylvania
12
17
5
5
5
7
2
2
21
16
18
5
5
6
7
2
2
Philadelphia
New Cumberland /
Defense Depot
Susquehanna
28
10
19
22
28
6
6
9
11
3
3
Rhode Island
NS Newport
21
South Carolina
MCAS Beaufort
Charleston Region:
Charletion AFB
NWS Charleston
71
19
19
192
219
49
55
34
36
8
8
AN
Oregon
E-21
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
Tennessee
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
56
56
67
16
15
18
22
20
22
6
6
6
62
17
18
Ellsworth AFB
Arnold AFB
15
30
4
11
5
12
2
5
141
150
33
8
12
Dyess AFB
Base / City
Columbia Region:
McEntire
Fort Jackson
Shaw AFB
38
43
13
28
32
12
7
7
5
2
5
2
4
1
2
31
10
14
Goodfellow AFB
NS Ingleside
NAS Kingsville
Laughlin AFB
Red River Army Depot /
Texarkana
San Antonio Region
Brooks AFB
Fort Sam Houston
Kelly AFB
Lackland AFB
Randolph AFB
8
8
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
17
12
11
11
11
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
Sheppard AFB
17
35
14
17
Hill AFB
114
48
50
17
153
73
60
27
61
35
20
12
Dahlgren
Dam Neck / Virginia Beach
Ocean front
16
11
Fort A. P. Hill
18
11
AN
Texas
S1
(%g)
Utah
Virginia
ED
South Dakota
SS
(%g)
EL
L
State
South Carolina
E-22
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
Fort Belvoir
15
Fort Eustis
13
Fort Lee
19
Fort Monroe
12
Fort Myer
15
Fort Story
11
15
12
11
Wallops Island
Yorktown Region:
Camp Perry
Cheatham Annex
Yorktown NWS
12
ED
Base / City
SS
(%g)
EL
L
State
Virginia
12
11
17
5
5
4
7
2
2
22
32
6
8
10
13
118(a)
39
42(b)
11
62
13
20
4
117
41
59
20
127(a)
46(b)
63
21
110(a)
38(b)
59
19
129(a)
45(b)
69
22
McChord AFB
Puget Sound Region:
Bangor NSB
Bremerton NS
Puget Sound NSY
119
41
61
20
158(a)
150(a)
153(a)
56(b)
53(b)
54(b)
76
72
73
23
23
23
AN
12
Washington
NS Everett
Fairchild AFB
E-23
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE E-2
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
133(a)
47(b)
59
20
Seattle
151
52
75
22
13
26
6
8
10
Huntington
Sugar Grove NRS
19
18
7
6
8
7
3
3
Fort McCoy
General Mitchell AFRC /
Milwaukee
11
Madison
11
F. E. Warren AFB
American Samoa Pago Pago / Tutuila Island
20
100
40
50
20
150
60
75
30
Saipan / Tinian
150
60
75
30
NRTF Aguada
119
38
Fort Buchanan
89
31
50
20
Ramey AFB
120
38
NS Roosevelt Roads
87
28
90
31
State
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Base / City
NAS Whidbey Island / Oak
Harbor
AN
Puerto Rico
EL
L
Wyoming
ED
SS
(%g)
(b) For Navy facilities at identified locations in Washington State use minimum S1 of 50 %g.
E-24
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX F
SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA
OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS
F-1
Climatic Loading Data Table. Site-specific structural climatic loading data for
potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is
provided in Table F-1.
ED
F-2
Earthquake Loading Data Table. Site-specific earthquake loading data for
potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is
provided in Table F-2.
EL
L
TABLE F-1
0
0
0
0
0
(mph)
Note
(a)
90
85
90
78
85
91
114
92
91
NAF Atsugi
21
100
1.00
161
152
MCAS Iwakuni
12
120
10
0.57
193
254
0
58
210
101
0
30
0.00
2.78
338
163
0
762
180
0.00
290
21
12
15
100
100
100
6
6
6
1.00
0.57
0.71
161
161
161
152
152
152
Base / City
Africa
Djibouti
Djibouti
Egypt
Alexandria
Morocco
Asia
(psf)
0
0
0
Continent
/ Region Country
Casablanca
Afghanistan Kabul
NSA Bahrain
AN
Bahrain
India
Bombay
Calcutta
Madras
New Delhi
Iraq
Japan
(inches)
0
0
0
(kPa)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(km/h)
Note
(a)
145
137
145
125
137
146
183
148
146
(mm)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baghdad
Basra
Iwo Jima
Misawa AFB
Okinawa
(All
installations)
Sagamihara
Sasebo
Tokyo
F-1
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
Continent
/ Region Country
Asia
Japan
Base / City
COMFLTACT
Yokosuka
Yokota AFB,
Honshu
Camp Zama
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
(inches)
12
100
0.57
161
152
21
100
1.00
161
161
21
100
1.00
161
152
0.00
0.00
169
0.00
169
Kuwait
Kuwait City
Oman
105
- Nazwa
105
EL
L
Batinah Coast
- Ash Shinash
0.00
169
0
0
105
105
0
0
0.00
0.00
169
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
115
115
115
115
115
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
185
185
185
185
185
0
0
0
0
0
- Sumail
0
0
115
115
0
0
0.00
0.00
185
185
0
0
- Rikshah
115
0.00
185
- Shaww
115
0.00
185
Kuria Muria
Island
Masirah Island
0
0
120
120
0
0
0.00
0.00
193
193
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
120
88
0
6
0
0
0
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
193
142
0
152
0
0
0
Central,
Southern, and
Coastal Areas
Sur to Sarfait
- Barik
- Dawqa
- Hayma
AN
- Salalah
- Shalim
High Jabal
Locations
- Miskin
105
- Suhar
Qatar
(mm)
- Sib
Pakistan
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
ED
TABLE F-1
Mussandam
Island
Peshawar
Doha
Hafr al Batin
87
80
F-2
140
129
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE F-1
Continent
/ Region Country
Base / City
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
(psf)
(inches)
(mm)
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
80
80
80
80
80
80
105
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.96
129
129
129
129
129
129
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
1219
20
110
24
0.96
177
610
Mushayt
Jeddah
Jubail
Qadimah
Riyadh
Tabuk
EL
L
Camp Hialeah,
Pusan
Camp
Humphreys /
Pyongtaek
Chinhae
Kimpo AFB
Kunsan /
Kunsan City
Osan AFB /
Songtan
Pohang
20
20
20
95
105
105
45
24
48
0.96
0.96
0.96
153
169
169
1143
610
1219
20
100
30
0.96
161
762
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
95
110
105
115
105
105
120
45
24
48
40
48
45
0
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.00
153
177
169
185
169
169
193
1143
610
1219
1016
1219
1143
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
95
120
130
110
80
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
153
153
193
209
177
129
153
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85
85
0
0
0.00
0.00
137
137
0
0
20
99
24
0.96
159
610
Seoul
Taegu
AN
Uijongbu
Yongsan
Vietnam
Da Nang
Ho Chi Minh
City
Nha Trang
Taiwan
Thailand
Tainan
Taipei
Tsoying
Bangkok
Chiang Mai
Sattahip
Udonthani
Turkey
Ankara
ED
Asia
(mph)
Note
(a)
F-3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE F-1
Continent
/ Region Country
Asia
Turkey
Base / City
Incirlik AB /
Adana
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
(inches)
70
0.00
113
127
15
95
12
0.72
153
305
95
0.00
153
(mm)
Karamursel
Central
America
Canal Zone
Europe
Belgium
Brussels
Kester
Kleine Brogel
Shape Chievres
Tulza AFB
EL
L
Bosnia Herzegovina
England
RAF Alconbury,
ED
Izmir AS
Molesworth /
Huntingdon
Birmingham
15
89
12
0.72
143
305
15
100
15
0.72
161
381
15
100
15
0.72
161
381
15
95
12
0.72
153
305
15
10
104
94
12
12
0.72
0.48
167
151
305
305
15
10
15
15
99
104
99
99
12
12
12
12
0.72
0.48
0.72
0.72
159
167
159
159
305
305
305
305
RAF Croughton
/ Brackley
RAF Fairford
AN
RAF
Lakenheath /
Lakeheath
Village
USNA UK /
London
RAF Menwith
Hill / Harrogate
RAF Mildenhall
Plymouth
RAF Upwood /
Ramsey
JMF St.
Mawgan /
Cornwall
Sculthorpe AB
Southport
South Shields
Spurn Head
Germany
Ansbach
Bamberg
F-4
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE F-1
Continent
/ Region Country
Base / City
Europe
Baumholder
Germany
Bremen
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
(inches)
25
85
30
25
25
25
90
55
55
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
1.20
137
(mm)
762
Garmisch AST
Geilenkirchen
Grafenwoehr
Hanau
Heidelberg
0
25
30
1.20
1.20
1.20
EL
L
Hohenfels
ED
Buechel Air
Base / Cochem
Darmstadt
145
89
89
0
635
762
Illesheim
Kaiserslautern
Kalkar
Mannheim
Munich
40
98
36
1.92
158
914
25
85
30
1.20
137
762
25
45
55
90
30
36
1.20
2.16
89
145
762
914
25
5
90
92
35
0
1.20
0.24
145
148
889
0
5
30
86
115
0
24
0.24
1.44
138
185
0
610
30
35
146
80
36
18
1.44
1.68
235
129
914
457
110
0.24
177
152
Ramstein AB
Rhein-Main Air
Base
Schweinfurt
AN
Spangdahlem
Air Base
Stuttgart
Vilseck
Greece
Iceland
Wiesbaden /
Mainz /
Dexheim
Wuerzburg /
Kitzingen /
Giebelstadt
Athens
Larissa
Italy
Aviano AB
Brindisi / San
Vito
F-5
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE F-1
Europe
Italy
Base / City
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
Camp Darby
Livorno
Gaeta - NSA
20
80
0.96
129
20
20
20
20
35
80
80
90
90
80
5
5
5
5
25
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
1.68
129
129
145
145
129
127
127
127
127
635
Ghedi
NSA La
Maddalena
NSA Naples
Niscemi
NAS Sigonella
Vicenza
Netherlands Volkel Air Base
Portugal
Scotland
Stavanger
Azores / Lajes
Field
Southlant /
Oeiras
Aberdeen
Edinburgh
AN
Edzell
Glasgow
Prestwick
Stornoway
Thurso
Spain
(mm)
15
70
20
0.72
113
508
15
133
12
0.72
214
305
120
0.00
193
15
15
15
15
15
15
90
99
85
99
100
120
12
12
12
12
12
12
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
145
159
137
159
161
193
305
305
305
305
305
305
15
105
12
0.72
169
305
10
83
0.48
134
152
5
5
90
117
5
6
0.24
0.24
145
188
127
152
10
117
0.48
188
152
47
115
36
2.25
185
914
66
107
permafrost
3.16
172 permafrost
Londonderry
Northern
Ireland
Norway
EL
L
AF North
Brunssum
Schinnen
(inches)
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
ED
Continent
/ Region Country
Madrid / JHQ
SW
Moron AB
NS Rota
San Pablo
HRF Valencia
Zaragoza
North
America
Canada
Argentia NAS,
Newfoundland
Churchill,
Manitoba
F-6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
Continent
/ Region Country
North
America
Canada
Base / City
Cold Lake,
Alberta
Edmonton,
Alberta
E. Harmon AFB,
Newfoundland
Fort William,
Ontario
Frobisher, NWT
Goose Airport,
Newfoundland
Ottawa, Ontario
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
(inches)
(mm)
41
81
72
1.96
130
1829
27
84
60
1.29
135
1524
86
113
60
4.12
182
1524
73
50
81
107
100
60
89
90
60
48
4.79
2.87
143
145
1524
1219
EL
L
130
1524
172 permafrost
36
36
3.45
1.92
183
145
914
914
45
82
60
2.16
132
1524
Simiutak AB
30
25
139
166
60
60
1.44
1.20
224
267
1524
1524
Sondrestrom
AB
Thule AB
20
25
120
135
permafrost
permafrost
0.96
1.20
193 permafrost
217 permafrost
67
0.00
108
148
0.00
238
148
0.00
238
161
0.00
259
148
0.00
238
105
0.00
169
59
0.00
95
105
0.00
169
130
209
80
129
AN
C
Pacific
Ocean
3.50
2.40
114
90
Atlantic
Ascension
Ocean
Island
Caribbean The Bahamas Eleuthera Island
Sea
Grand Bahama
Island
Grand Turk
Island
Great Exuma
Island
Cuba
NS
Guantanamo
Bay
Trinidad
Port of Spain
Indian
Ocean
60
permafrost
72
40
Greenland
St. Johns,
Newfoundland
Toronto, Ontario
Winnipeg,
Manitoba
Narsarssuak AB
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
ED
TABLE F-1
Island
British Indian NSF Diego
Ocean
Garcia
Territory
Australia
H.E. Holt / N.W.
Cape
Woomera
F-7
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
Ground Wind
Frost
Ground Wind
Frost
Snow Speed Penetration Snow Speed Penetration
TABLE F-1
Pacific
Ocean
Caroline
Islands
Johnston
Atoll
Marcus
Island
Marshall
Islands
Base / City
(psf)
(mph)
Note
(a)
Koror, Paulau
Islands
Ponape
0
0
95
110
0
0
0.00
0.00
153
177
0
0
95
0.00
137
150
0
0
105
110
0
0
0
0
0
95
90
90
90
150
Kwajalein
Wake Island
Clark AFB
Sangley Point
Subic Bay
Samoa
Apia / Upolu
(mm)
0.00
241
0
0
0.00
0.00
169
177
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
153
145
145
145
241
0
0
0
0
0
EL
L
Midway
Island
Philipine Is.
(inches)
(km/h)
Note
(kPa)
(a)
ED
Continent
/ Region Country
AN
Note (a) Use a minimum wind speed of 85 mph (137 km/h) for all locations
F-8
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2 EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE
UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS
TABLE F-2
Country
Base / City
Africa
Djibouti
Djibouti
Egypt
Alexandria
Morocco
Casablanca
Afghanistan
Kabul
Bahrain
NSA Bahrain
India
Bombay
Asia
SS
(%g)
82
23
25
128
31
26
50
14
71
124
98
187
S1
(%g)
33
9
10
51
12
10
20
6
28
56
39
75
10/50 SS
(%g)
41
11
13
64
15
13
25
7
35
62
49
10/50 S1
(%g)
16
5
5
26
6
5
10
3
14
29
20
94
38
47
19
89
124
36
56
45
18
165
75
83
38
187
91
187
75
36
75
45
94
18
37
187
200
187
54
75
80
75
22
100
40
27
11
91
36
46
18
- Nazwa
88
35
44
18
166
129
149
66
52
60
83
65
75
33
26
30
ED
Continent /
Region
Calcutta
Madras
New Delhi
Baghdad
EL
L
Iraq
Basra
Japan
NAF Atsugi
MCAS Iwakuni
Iwo Jima
Misawa AFB
Okinawa
(All installations)
Sagamihara
Sasebo
AN
Tokyo
COMFLTACT
Yokosuka
Yokota AFB, Honshu
Kuwait
Oman
Camp Zama
Kuwait City
Batinah Coast
- Ash Shinash
- Sib
- Suhar
Central, Southern,
and Coastal Areas
Sur to Sarfait
F-9
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2
Continent /
Region
Country
Base / City
Asia
Oman
- Barik
SS
(%g)
- Dawqa
- Hayma
- Salalah
- Shalim
S1
(%g)
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
3
0
8
0
1
0
3
0
2
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
107
43
54
21
98
99
39
40
49
50
20
20
19
- Miskin
- Sumail
- Rikshah
- Shaww
Kuria Muria Island
EL
L
Masirah Island
ED
Mussandam Island
Pakistan
Peshawar
Qatar
Doha
Saudi Arabia
Dhahran
105
6
10
42
6
53
3
21
3
6
49
35
24
6 (a)
2
20
14
10
6 (a)
3
24
18
12
3 (a)
1
10
7
5
3 (a)
28
15
30
11
6
12
14
7
15
6
3
6
19
17
15
17
19
14
17
29
17
17
18
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
11
7
7
7
9
8
8
8
9
7
8
14
8
9
9
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
6
3
3
4
Hafr al Batin
Khamis Mushayt
Jeddah
Jubail
Qadimah
AN
Riyadh
Tabuk
South Korea
Camp Casey
Camp Humphreys /
Pyongtaek
Chinhae
Kimpo AFB
Kunsan / Kunsan City
Osan AFB / Songtan
Pohang
Seoul
Taegu
Uijongbu
Yongsan / Seoul
Vietnam
Da Nang
F-10
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2
Country
Base / City
Asia
Vietnam
Taiwan
Nha Trang
Tainan
SS
(%g)
14
13
239
325
251
28
27
21
24
S1
(%g)
6
5
96
130
100
11
11
9
10
10/50 SS
(%g)
7
6
120
162
125
14
14
11
12
10/50 S1
(%g)
3
3
48
65
50
6
5
4
5
99
40
49
20
105
242
139
42
97
56
52
121
70
21
48
28
Kester
93
32
36
37
13
14
46
16
18
19
6
7
Kleine Brogel
31
13
16
Shape - Chievres
54
22
27
11
Taipei
Tsoying
Thailand
Bangkok
Chiang Mai
Sattahip
Udonthani
Ankara
Turkey
Incirlik AB / Adana
Central
America
Europe
Canal Zone
Belgium
Brussels
Tulza AFB
Bosnia Herzegovina
England
EL
L
Izmir AS
Karamursel
92
37
46
18
RAF Alconbury,
Molesworth /
Huntingdon
Birmingham
18
22
7
9
9
11
4
4
RAF Croughton /
Brackley
RAF Fairford
28
16
11
6
14
8
6
3
RAF Lakenheath /
Lakeheath Village
USNA UK / London
15
13
6
3
8
6
3
1
21
11
15
20
6
8
8
10
3
4
16
20
16
23
4
6
9
10
8
12
2
3
5
AN
C
ED
Continent /
Region
F-11
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2
Continent /
Region
Country
Base / City
Europe
England
South Shields
SS
(%g)
11
S1
(%g)
5
10/50 SS
(%g)
6
10/50 S1
(%g)
2
10
8
10
4
12
10
13
5
5
4
5
2
Spurn Head
Ansbach
24
21
25
10
Bamberg
Baumholder
Bremen
Buechel Air Base /
Cochem
Darmstadt
Garmisch AST
Geilenkirchen
Grafenwoehr
33
40
46
55
24
38
38
26
13
16
18
22
10
15
15
10
16
20
23
27
12
19
19
13
7
8
9
11
5
8
8
5
23
25
22
9
10
9
11
13
11
5
5
4
40
26
24
39
21
16
10
10
16
8
20
13
12
20
10
8
5
5
8
4
24
44
22
10
18
9
12
22
11
5
9
4
38
15
19
21
81
140
9
32
26
11
40
70
4
16
13
120
34
60
17
100
40
50
20
49
115
37
19
46
15
24
57
18
10
23
7
EL
L
Hanau
ED
Germany
Heidelberg
Hohenfels
Illesheim
Kaiserslautern
Kalkar
Mannheim
Munich
Ramstein AB
AN
Schweinfurt
Spangdahlem Air
Base
Stuttgart
Vilseck
Greece
Iceland
Wiesbaden / Mainz /
Dexheim
Wuerzburg / Kitzingen
/ Giebelstadt
Athens
Larissa
NAS Soudi Bay /
Mouzouras
Keflavik - NSA
Thorshofn
Italy
Aviano AB
Brindisi / San Vito
F-12
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2
Country
Base / City
Europe
Italy
Netherlands
Scotland
Aberdeen
Edinburgh
Edzell
Glasgow
Prestwick
Stornoway
Thurso
Madrid / JHQ SW
AN
Spain
S1
(%g)
25
21
29
9
27
31
31
37
12
22
6
10/50 SS
(%g)
31
25
36
12
34
60
60
46
15
28
3
10/50 S1
(%g)
12
11
14
5
14
16
16
19
6
11
3
165
61
9
17
11
21
12
10
9
75
25
4
7
4
9
5
4
3
83
31
5
8
5
11
6
5
4
38
12
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
13
61
72
5
24
28
6
31
36
3
12
14
66
15
27
6
33
8
13
3
21
1
5
8
8
0
2
3
10
0
3
4
4
0
1
2
16
EL
L
Northern
Ireland
Norway
Portugal
SS
(%g)
62
50
71
23
67
120
120
93
29
55
6
ED
Continent /
Region
Moron AB
NS Rota
San Pablo
HRF Valencia
Zaragoza
Argentia NAS,
Newfoundland
Churchill, Manitoba
Cold Lake, Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
E. Harmon AFB,
Newfoundland
Fort William, Ontario
Frobisher, NWT
F-13
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE F-2
Country
Base / City
SS
(%g)
Goose Airport,
Newfoundland
Ottawa, Ontario
St. Johns,
Newfoundland
Toronto, Ontario
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Greenland
Narsarssuak AB
Simiutak AB
Sondrestrom AB
Thule AB
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
16
91
6
36
8
46
3
18
19
36
31
31
31
22
37
8
15
14
14
14
9
15
10
18
16
16
16
11
18
4
7
7
7
7
4
7
2
2
58
19
126
1
1
23
8
50
1
1
29
10
63
0
0
12
4
25
171
68
86
34
70
28
35
14
47
19
23
47
19
23
70
103
136
95
28
41
54
38
35
51
68
47
14
21
27
19
119
137
48
55
60
68
24
27
159
195
177
158
64
78
71
63
79
97
88
79
32
39
35
32
EL
L
S1
(%g)
ED
Continent /
Region
NS Guantanamo Bay
Cuba
Trinidad
Port of Spain
Island
Indian Ocean British Indian NSF Diego Garcia
Ocean
Territoty
Pacific Ocean Australia
H.E. Holt / N.W. Cape
AN
Woomera
Caroline
Islands
Johnston Atoll
Marcus Island
Marshall
Islands
Kwajalein
Wake Island
Midway Island
Philipine Is.
Clark AFB
Sangley Point
Subic Bay
Samoa
Apia / Upolu
F-14
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX G
EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA AT ADDITIONAL SELECTED LOCATIONS
OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS
G-1 Earthquake Loading Data Table. Earthquake loading data for additional
selected cities outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in
Table G-1.
ED
Continent /
Region
Country
Africa
Algeria
Base / City
S1
(%g)
38.4
24.0
2.2
4.4
1.0
17.7
26.5
6.3
10.4
10/50 SS
(%g)
48.0
30.0
2.8
5.4
1.3
22.1
33.1
7.9
13.0
10/50 S1
(%g)
19.2
12.0
1.1
2.2
0.5
8.8
13.2
3.2
5.2
26.0
10.4
13.0
5.2
5.6
2.2
2.8
1.1
74.0
29.6
37.0
14.8
37.4
3.7
67.2
65.1
14.9
1.5
26.9
26.1
18.7
1.8
33.6
32.6
7.5
0.7
13.4
13.0
15.8
43.0
55.3
26.0
6.3
17.2
22.1
10.4
7.9
21.5
27.6
13.0
3.2
8.6
11.1
5.2
AN
EL
L
Alger
Oran
Angola
Luanda
Benin
Cotonou
Botswana
Gaborone
Burkino Vaso Kampala
Burundi
Bujumbura
Cameroon
Douala
Yaounde
Central
Bangui
African
Republic
Chad
Ndjamena
SS
(%g)
96.1
60.0
5.6
10.9
2.6
44.1
66.1
15.8
26.0
Brazzaville
Congo,
Democratic
Republic of
the
Bukavu
Congo
Cote d'Ivoire
Egypt
Equatorial
Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Kinshasa
Lubumbashi
Abidjan
Cairo
Port Said
Malabo
Asmara
Addis Ababa
Libreville
Banjul
G-1
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Base / City
Ghana
Accra
Guinea
Conakry
Guinea-Bissau Bissau
Kenya
Nairobi
Lesotho
Maseru
Liberia
Monrovia
Libya
Tripoli
Madagascar Tananarive
Malawi
Blantyre
Lilongwe
Zomba
Mali
Bamako
Mauritania
Nouakchott
Morocco
Kenitra
Rabat
Tangier
Mozambique Maputo
Niger
Niamey
Nigera
Ibadan
Kaduna
Lagos
Rwanda
Kigali
Senegal
Dakar
Sierra Leone Freetown
Somalia
Mogadishu
South Africa Cape Town
Durban
Johannesburg
Natal
Swaziland
Pretoria
Tanzania
Dar es Salaam
Mbabane
Togo
Zanzibar
Tunisia
Lome
Uganda
Tunis
Zambia
Ougadougou
Zimbabwe
Harare
Lusaka
Afghanistan Bagram
Gardeyz
Herat
Jalalabad
Kandahar
Lashkar Gah
SS
(%g)
35.6
36.1
0.9
30.7
6.3
21.4
57.1
18.4
46.3
26.3
48.3
S1
(%g)
14.3
14.5
0.4
12.3
2.5
8.5
22.9
7.3
18.5
10.5
19.3
10/50 SS
(%g)
17.8
18.1
0.5
15.3
3.1
10.7
28.6
9.2
23.1
13.2
24.2
10/50 S1
(%g)
7.1
7.2
0.2
6.1
1.3
4.3
11.4
3.7
9.3
5.3
9.7
7.7
27.0
25.5
44.3
10.2
0.2
3.1
10.8
10.2
17.7
4.1
0.1
3.8
13.5
12.7
22.2
5.1
0.1
1.5
5.4
5.1
8.9
2.0
0.0
5.6
0.3
27.8
7.7
34.9
2.2
0.1
11.1
3.1
14.0
2.8
0.1
13.9
3.8
17.4
1.1
0.1
5.6
1.5
7.0
26.0
28.7
3.1
6.4
3.1
17.1
17.9
11.5
37.5
91.0
10.4
11.5
1.2
2.6
1.2
6.8
7.2
4.6
15.0
36.4
13.0
14.3
1.5
3.2
1.5
8.5
9.0
5.7
18.8
45.5
5.2
5.7
0.6
1.3
0.6
3.4
3.6
2.3
7.5
18.2
5.6
21.9
140.0
70.0
60.0
130.0
30.0
17.0
2.2
8.8
70.0
28.0
20.0
32.0
16.0
10.0
2.8
11.0
1.1
4.4
AN
EL
L
Africa
Country
ED
Continent /
Region
Asia
G-2
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Base / City
Asia
Afghanistan
Mazar-e Sharif
Pol-e Charkhi
Qalat
Manama
Dhaka
Bandar Seri Begawan
Mandalay
Rangoon
Beijing (Peking)
Chengdu
Chongqing
Guangzhou (Canton)
Harbin
Nanjing
Qingdao (Tsingtao)
Shanghai
Shengyang
Tianjin (Tientsan)
Wuhan
Hong Kong
Bandung
Jakarta
Medan
Surabaya
Isfahan
Shiraz
Tabriz
Tehran
Kirkuk
Haifa
Jerusalem
Tel Aviv
Fukuoka
Itazuke AFB
Kobe
Osaka
Sapporo
Yokohama
Amman
Ali Al Salem
Vientiane
Beirut
Kuala Lumpur
Kathmandu
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Brunei
Burma
Burma
China
AN
Iran
Hong Kong
Indonesia
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Nepal
SS
(%g)
80.0
100.0
60.0
26.9
69.5
37.2
201.0
76.8
55.9
44.2
8.4
13.5
12.4
23.4
31.6
17.3
88.7
72.2
7.3
12.8
164.3
138.1
111.5
96.4
90.8
173.2
181.2
205.0
165.0
136.9
106.9
95.2
67.4
73.6
189.8
178.1
100.4
187
70.2
24.2
53.9
149.7
55.8
245.5
S1
(%g)
30.0
40.0
30.0
10.8
27.8
14.9
80.4
30.7
22.4
17.7
3.4
5.4
4.9
9.4
12.6
6.9
35.5
28.9
2.9
5.1
65.7
55.2
44.6
38.6
36.3
69.3
72.5
82.0
75.0
54.7
42.8
38.1
27.0
29.4
75.9
71.2
40.2
75
28.1
9.7
21.6
59.9
22.3
98.2
10/50 SS
(%g)
10/50 S1
(%g)
13.5
34.8
18.6
100.5
38.4
28.0
22.1
4.2
6.8
6.2
11.7
15.8
8.7
44.3
36.1
3.7
6.4
82.1
69.0
55.7
48.2
45.4
86.6
90.6
102.5
5.4
13.9
7.4
40.2
15.4
11.2
8.8
1.7
2.7
2.5
4.7
6.3
3.5
17.7
14.4
1.5
2.6
32.9
27.6
22.3
19.3
18.2
34.6
36.2
41.0
68.4
53.4
47.6
33.7
36.8
94.9
89.0
50.2
27.4
21.4
19.0
13.5
14.7
38.0
35.6
20.1
35.1
12.1
27.0
74.9
27.9
122.8
14.0
4.8
10.8
29.9
11.2
49.1
ED
Country
EL
L
Continent /
Region
G-3
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Base / City
Oman
Pakistan
Muscat
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
All
Colombo
Kimhae
Kwangju
Aleppo
Damascus
Changhua
Kao-hsiung
Songkhla
Udorn
Istanbul
Abu Dhabi
Singapore
Sir Lanka
South Korea
South Korea
Syria
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
United Arab
Emirates
Dubai
Aden City
Sanaa
Belmopan
Yemen
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Albania
Austria
San Jose
San Salvador
Guatemala
Tegucigalpa
Tirana
Salzburg
Vienna
Antwerp
Sofia
Nicosia
Prague
AN
Europe
Belize
Central
America
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech
Republic
Denmark
England
Finland
France
France
Germany
SS
(%g)
123.6
128.9
73.3
117.1
37.5
2.6
18.3
12.9
64.3
79.1
274.4
250.6
29.6
24.1
145.8
S1
(%g)
49.5
51.6
29.3
46.8
15.0
1.0
7.3
5.2
25.7
31.6
109.8
100.3
11.8
9.6
58.3
10/50 SS
(%g)
61.8
64.5
36.6
58.5
18.8
1.3
9.2
6.5
32.2
39.5
137.2
125.3
14.8
12.0
72.9
10/50 S1
(%g)
24.7
25.8
14.7
23.4
7.5
0.5
3.7
2.6
12.9
15.8
54.9
50.1
5.9
4.8
29.2
107.0
168.4
36.6
34.3
42.8
67.4
14.7
13.7
53.5
84.2
18.3
17.2
21.4
33.7
7.3
6.9
53.7
280.4
170.8
168.3
99.9
111.6
41.5
49.3
19.7
116.3
118.0
21.5
112.2
68.3
67.3
40.0
44.6
16.6
19.7
7.9
46.5
47.2
26.8
140.2
85.4
84.2
50.0
55.8
20.7
24.7
9.9
58.1
59.0
10.7
56.1
34.2
33.7
20.0
22.3
8.3
9.9
3.9
23.3
23.6
12.8
11.6
23.0
5.1
16.4
36.2
28.6
44.4
41.3
42.7
34.2
5.1
4.7
9.2
2.0
6.6
14.5
11.4
17.8
16.5
17.1
13.7
6.4
5.8
11.5
2.6
8.2
18.1
14.3
22.2
20.7
21.3
17.1
2.6
2.3
4.6
1.0
3.3
7.2
5.7
8.9
8.3
8.5
6.8
ED
Asia
Country
EL
L
Continent /
Region
Copenhagen
Liverpool
Helsinki
Bordeaux
Istres AFB
Lyon
Marseille
Nice
Strasbourg
Babenhausen
G-4
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Base / City
Germany
Berlin
Bonn
Dusseldorf
Frankfurt am Main
Giebelstadt
Hamburg
Kitzingen
Landstuhl
Vaihingen an der Enz
Kavalla
Nea Makri
Rhodes
Thessaloniki
Budapest
Taszar AB
Reykjavik
Florence
Genoa
Milan
Palermo
Rome
Siculiana
Trieste
Turin
Luxembourg
Valletta
Amsterdam
Belfast
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
AN
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Northern
Ireland
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of
Ireland
Romania
Russia
Scotland
SS
(%g)
5.1
42.2
30.6
37.7
21.9
9.2
21.2
23.7
38.7
108.2
86.7
137.0
142.1
46.3
S1
(%g)
2.0
16.9
12.3
15.1
8.8
3.7
8.5
9.5
15.5
43.3
34.7
54.8
56.8
18.5
10/50 SS
(%g)
2.6
21.1
15.3
18.8
11.0
4.6
10.6
11.9
19.4
54.1
43.4
68.5
71.0
23.1
Oslo
Krakow
Poznan
Waraszawa
Warsow
Lisbon
Oporto
Dublin
Bucharest
Kiev
Moscow
St. Petersburg
(Leningrad)
Hamilton
G-5
10/50 S1
(%g)
1.0
8.4
6.1
7.5
4.4
1.8
4.2
4.7
7.7
21.6
17.3
27.4
28.4
9.3
ED
Europe
Country
EL
L
Continent /
Region
91.8
96.4
66.1
41.3
66.9
89.8
44.8
72.3
53.7
21.4
28.6
13.0
36.7
38.6
26.4
16.5
26.8
35.9
17.9
28.9
21.5
8.6
11.5
5.2
45.9
48.2
33.0
20.7
33.5
44.9
22.4
36.2
26.8
10.7
14.3
6.5
18.4
19.3
13.2
8.3
13.4
18.0
9.0
14.5
10.7
4.3
5.7
2.6
8.7
14.8
19.1
5.6
11.7
10.2
67.7
64.5
3.5
5.9
7.6
2.2
4.7
4.1
27.1
25.8
4.3
7.4
9.5
2.8
5.9
5.1
33.9
32.2
1.7
3.0
3.8
1.1
2.3
2.0
13.5
12.9
9.4
104.9
6.6
6.6
3.8
42.0
2.7
2.7
4.7
52.5
3.3
3.3
1.9
21.0
1.3
1.3
6.6
18.3
2.7
7.3
3.3
9.2
1.3
3.7
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Continent /
Region
Country
Base / City
Europe
Scotland
Renfrew
Serbia and
Montenegro
Serbia and
Montenegro
Slovakia
Spain
Belgrade
Bratislava
Barcelona
Bilbao
Sevilleja de la Jara
Goteborg
Stockholm
Bern
Geneva
Zurich
Calgary
Halifax
Montreal
Vancouver
Ciudad Juarez
Guadalajara
Hermosillo
Matamoros
Mazatlan
Merida
Mexico City
Monterrey
Nuevo Laredo
Tijuana
Buenos Aires
La Paz
Belem
Belo Horizonte
Brasilia
Manaus
Porto Alegre
Recife
Rio de Janeiro
Salvador
Sao Paulo
Santiago
Valparaiso
Bogata
Guayaquil
Quito
AN
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Ecuador
10/50 S1
(%g)
4.3
97.2
38.9
48.6
19.4
103.9
56.2
60.0
32.1
12.8
14.4
7.7
44.0
46.3
38.9
19.8
25.0
102.9
90.4
18.2
146.9
46.3
2.0
97.4
3.6
56.9
21.5
14.8
92.7
6.6
111.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.5
4.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
202.5
289.3
166.4
136.9
204.6
41.6
22.5
24.0
12.9
5.1
5.7
3.1
17.6
18.5
15.6
7.9
10.0
41.2
36.2
7.3
58.8
18.5
0.8
39.0
1.4
22.8
8.6
5.9
37.1
2.7
44.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
81.0
115.7
66.6
54.8
81.8
52.0
28.1
30.0
16.1
6.4
7.2
3.8
22.0
23.1
19.5
9.9
12.5
51.4
45.2
9.1
73.4
23.1
1.0
48.7
1.8
28.5
10.8
7.4
46.4
3.3
55.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
2.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
101.2
144.7
83.2
68.5
102.3
20.8
11.2
12.0
6.4
2.6
2.9
1.5
8.8
9.3
7.8
4.0
5.0
20.6
18.1
3.6
29.4
9.3
0.4
19.5
0.7
11.4
4.3
3.0
18.5
1.3
22.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
40.5
57.9
33.3
27.4
40.9
Zagrebac
Mexico
10/50 SS
(%g)
10.8
ED
Switzerland
S1
(%g)
8.6
EL
L
Sweden
SS
(%g)
21.6
G-6
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Continent /
Region
Country
Base / City
S1
(%g)
6.1
142.1
75.3
1.4
52.4
41.8
2.9
15.0
10.2
43.1
10/50 SS
(%g)
7.7
177.6
94.1
1.8
65.5
52.2
3.6
18.7
12.8
53.8
10/50 S1
(%g)
3.1
71.0
37.7
0.7
26.2
20.9
1.4
7.5
5.1
21.5
173.6
107.3
131.0
80.0
144.9
97.4
162.4
69.5
42.9
52.4
32.0
58.0
39.0
65.0
86.8
53.6
65.5
40.0
72.4
48.7
81.2
34.7
21.5
26.2
16.0
29.0
19.5
32.5
149.6
89.8
59.8
35.9
74.8
44.9
29.9
18.0
53.1
80.5
108.1
21.2
24.2
32.6
26.5
40.2
60.1
10.6
12.4
17.8
107.5
32.5
59.7
17.8
111.8
0.0
93.1
30.6
46.4
46.9
45.1
43.9
44.7
0.0
28.8
12.2
18.6
18.8
18.0
17.6
55.9
0.0
49.1
15.3
23.2
23.4
22.5
21.9
22.4
0.0
15.4
6.1
9.3
9.4
9.0
8.8
78.6
57.1
31.4
22.8
39.3
28.5
15.7
11.4
121.4
83.8
228.2
48.6
33.5
91.3
60.7
41.9
114.1
24.3
16.8
45.6
AN
EL
L
ED
SS
(%g)
15.3
355.2
188.3
3.6
131.0
104.4
7.1
37.4
25.5
107.7
Trinidad &
Tobago
Trinidad
Vieques
Pacific Ocean Australia
Caroline
Islands
Fiji
Marshall
Islands
New Zealand
New Zealand
Scarborough
Trinidad NS
Isabel Segunda
Brisbane
Canberra
Melbourne
Perth
Sydney
Yap
Suva
Majuro
Auckland
Wellington
G-7
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
TABLE G-1
Continent /
Region
Country
Port Moresby
Baguio
Cebu
Manila
Capitol Hill
SS
(%g)
78.1
S1
(%g)
31.3
10/50 SS
(%g)
39.1
10/50 S1
(%g)
15.6
164.0
114.0
193.2
99.8
99.4
65.6
45.6
77.3
39.9
39.8
82.0
57.0
96.6
49.9
49.7
32.8
22.8
38.6
20.0
19.9
AN
EL
L
ED
Saipan
Tinian
Base / City
G-8
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
APPENDIX H
AN
EL
L
ED
FIGURE H-1
AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION FOR 1.0
SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS
H-1
AN
EL
L
ED
UFC 3-301-01
27 January 2010
FIGURE H-2
AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION FOR 0.2
SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS
H-2