Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intellectual
Series
Your
Public
Intellectual
Series
is
comprised
of
a
small
series
of
texts
you
develop
as
a
public
intellectual:
2) An
authors
bio
that
you
have
carefully
written
and
revised
specifically
to
develop
a
particular
kind
of
ETHOS
for
yourself
as
a
rhetorical
SCHOLAR,
one
who
specializes
in
whatever
your
big
question
has
been
this
term
for
your
semester
project,
writing
to
a
public-audience
of
CU
students.
3) Three
Pieces
of
Writing
youve
written/developed
as
a
Public
Intellectual,
specifically
as
a
rhetorical
scholar
who
specializes
in
whatever
your
big
question
has
been
this
term
for
your
semester
project,
writing
for
a
public
audience
of
students
at
CU
and
to
be
published
in
an
online
journal
for
that
audience
of
readers.
These
three
pieces,
together
with
your
authors
photo
and
bio,
are
all
for
your
BLOG-COLUMN
on
our
class
web-magazine/digital
journal,
shortly
to
be
published
online,
for
students
at
the
University
of
Colorado.
a. A
Dissuasion
Piece
for
your
blog-column,
in
which
you
attempt
to
get
your
audience
NOT
to
buy
the
argument
put
forth
by
another
writer
(specifically,
from
one
of
the
pieces
from
your
research
this
semester
that
youve
listed
in
your
Public
Audience
Sources
on
your
Annotated
Bibliography).
This
should
be
1200
to
1500
words
(about
4-5
pages).
credit),
and
it
must
use
MORE
THAN
JUST
WORDS
AND
LETTERS
(typography,
graphics,
photos,
animations,
sounds,
music,
performance,
graphic
design
and
layout,
etc.).
***ASSUME
IM
JUST
NOT
SEEING
IT
WITHOUT
YOUR
HELP.
Look
at
your
stuff
and
figure
out
what
my
counter-arguments
would
probably
bewhat
someone
would
say
if
he/she
were
looking
at
all
the
parts
of
your
public
intellectual
series
and
thinking,
Nope,
this
dude/dudettes
really
not
getting
exactly
how
you
get
oriented
in
different
rhetorical
situations
and
then
figure
out
how
to
write
really
persuasively
to
the
different
audiences
you
find
in
there,
BECAUSE
__________,
_________________,
and
__________________.
Prove
dem
counter-arguments
are
wrong
and
that
your
public
intellectual
series
really
does
PROVE
you
can
get
yourself
oriented
in
different
rhetorical
situations
and
then
figure
out
how
to
write
really
persuasively
to
the
different
audiences
you
find
there,
BECAUSE
________,
_________,
and
___________.)
5) A
ONE
page
reflective
essay
for
your
INSTRUCTOR
(me)
in
which
you
explain
and
SHOW
exactly
how
you
used
the
stuff
you
got
in
our
workshops
to
actually
REVISE
each
of
the
parts
of
your
Public
Intellectual
Series.
************************************************************************************
a. 1-Page
Reflection
on
How
You
USED
the
WORKSHOPS
to
REVISE
Your
Project
(for
you
instructor)
g. Then,
your
Multi-Modal
Piece
(your
advertisement
for
your
blog-
column)
4/16/13
WRTG:11503011stYrWritingrhetoric
Grading
Wewillassessandevaluateyourworkonthisprojectbylookingathowclearlyyouressay,includingthesupporting
materialsyouturninwithit,DEMONSTRATESyourdevelopedrhetoricalknowledge,abilitytoanalyzetextsinavarietyof
genres,torefineandreflectonyourownprocess,yourdevelopedinformationliteracyandabilitytoconstructaneffectiveand
ethicalargument,andyourabilitytounderstandandapplylanguageconventionsrhetorically.
IhaveINTEGRATEDthegradingitemsyouallcameupwithasaclassrightintotheexistingrubric.
So:
Developedrhetoricalknowledge,analyzingandmakinginformedchoicesaboutpurposes,audiences,andcontextasyou
readandcomposetexts,andusageofthetransfer,byapplyinggeneralrhetoricalknowledgeto
newrhetoricalsituations
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
Theabilitytobothwriteandanalyzetextsinavarietyofgenres,understandinghowcontent,style,structureandformat
varyacrossarangeofreadingandwritingsituations,andbyusingmultimodalcompositiontomakeanargument
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
Theabilitytorefineandreflectonyourwritingprocess,usingmultiplestrategiestogenerateideas,draft,revise,and
edityourwritingacrossavarietyofgenres
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
Developedinformationliteracy,makingcriticalchoicesasyouidentifyaspecificresearchneed,locateandevaluate
informationandsources,anddrawconnectionsamongyourownandothers'ideasinyourwriting
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
Theabilitytoconstructeffectiveandethicalarguments,usingappropriatereasonsandevidencetosupportyour
positionswhilerespondingtomultiplepointsofview,andusingethostohelpyoupersuadeaspecificaudience
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
Theabilitytounderstandandapplylanguageconventionsrhetorically,includinggrammar,spelling,punctuationand
formatinawaythatiscalledforinthespecificrhetoricalsituation.
ExcellentSatisfactoryNotQuiteThere,Yet
https://learn.colorado.edu/d2l/le/content/44013/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus
1/2
4/16/13
AllExcellentAtoA+(DependingonhowExcellentoftheseis)
AllSatisfactoriesB
MixofExcellentsandSatisfactoriesBtoA(Dependingonthemix)
MixofExcellents,Satisfactories,andNotQuiteThere,YetsCtoB(Dependingonthemix)
MixofSatisfactoriesandNotQuiteThere,YetsD+toC+(Dependingonthemix)
AllNotQuiteThere,YetsFtoD+(Dependingonhowfarfromthereeachoftheseis)
***************************************************************************************************************************
Ourmainthingbeinggraded:Whetherornotitisdemonstratedthatthewriter
isapublicintellectual:
Todothis,thefollowingstepsmustbemet...
AbletopersuadeanyaudienceonapublicissuebyusingEthos.
Formattedinawaythatiscalledforinthespecificrhetoricalsituation.
Usageofthetransferskill,byapplyinggeneralrhetoricalknowledgeto
newrhetoricalsituations.
Theabilitytowritetoaspecificinterestbasedpublicgroup.
Theabilitytousemultimodalcompositiontomakeanargument(through
creationanduseofaclassblogwhereweuploadourpieces)
Developargumentsthatareeffectiveforspecificaudiences
Thislistcreatedby
AJSamuel
TrevorStephens
KeatonRoss
JeremyBrown
Published
Addrestrictions...
New
AddActivities
MoreActions
Draganddropfilesheretocreateandupdatetopics
Noitemsfound.
https://learn.colorado.edu/d2l/le/content/44013/printsyllabus/PrintSyllabus
2/2